1
|
Labib PLZ, Russell TB, Denson JL, Puckett MA, Ausania F, Pando E, Roberts KJ, Kausar A, Mavroeidis VK, Bhogal RH, Marangoni G, Thomasset SC, Frampton AE, Spalding DR, Lykoudis P, Maglione M, Alhaboob N, Srinivasan P, Bari H, Smith A, Dominguez-Rosado I, Croagh D, Thakkar RG, Gomez D, Silva MA, Lapolla P, Mingoli A, Davidson BR, Porcu A, Shah NS, Hamady ZZ, Al-Sarireh BA, Serrablo A, Aroori S. Patterns, timing and predictors of recurrence following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international multicentre retrospective cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2025; 27:445-460. [PMID: 39870557 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 11/28/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) develop recurrence. No previous studies have investigated predictors of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC. Our study aimed to determine timing, pattern and predictors of any-site and local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC. METHODS Patients who underwent PD for PDAC between June 2012 and May 2015 (29 centres, eight countries) were included. The primary outcome was recurrence pattern (none, local-only, distant-only or mixed local/distant). Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, investigations, operation details, complications, histology, adjuvant therapies, recurrence and survival. Univariable tests and regression analysis investigated factors associated with any-site and local-only recurrence. RESULTS Of 866 patients, 573 (66 %) developed recurrence: 170 (20 %) developed local-only recurrence, 164 (19 %) developed mixed local/distant recurrence, and 239 (28 %) developed distant-only recurrence. Local-only or lung-only recurrence had a more favourable prognosis than other recurrence patterns. Predictors of any-site recurrence were preoperative biliary stenting, venous resection and poorly-differentiated, node-positive tumours. Predictors of local-only recurrence were preoperative radiological lymphadenopathy, well-differentiated tumours, fewer than 15 resected lymph nodes and intraoperative blood transfusion. DISCUSSION Ensuring radical resection and avoiding intraoperative blood transfusion may reduce the risk of local-only recurrence following PD for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter L Z Labib
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas B Russell
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Jemimah L Denson
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Mark A Puckett
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Keith J Roberts
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ambareen Kausar
- East Lancashire Hospital NHS Trust, Blackburn, United Kingdom
| | - Vasileios K Mavroeidis
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ricky H Bhogal
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gabriele Marangoni
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | | | - Adam E Frampton
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Pavlos Lykoudis
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Parthi Srinivasan
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hassaan Bari
- Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Andrew Smith
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Rohan G Thakkar
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Dhanny Gomez
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Michael A Silva
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrea Mingoli
- Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Porcu
- Cliniche San Pietro, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Nehal S Shah
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Zaed Z Hamady
- University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Somaiah Aroori
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Feasibility and outcome of spleen and vessel preserving total pancreatectomy (SVPTP) in pancreatic malignancies - a retrospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:3457-3465. [PMID: 36169725 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02690-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Total pancreatectomy (TP) is most commonly performed to avoid postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in patients with high-risk pancreas or to achieve tumor-free resection margins. As part of TP, a simultaneous splenectomy is usually performed primarily for the reason of oncologic radicality. However, the benefit of a simultaneous splenectomy remains unclear. Likewise, the technical feasibility as well as the safety of spleen and vessel preserving total pancreatectomy in pancreatic malignancies has hardly been evaluated. Thus, the aims of the study were to evaluate the feasibility as well as the results of spleen and vessel preserving total pancreatectomy (SVPTP). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patient characteristics, technical feasibility, perioperative data, morbidity, and mortality as well as histopathological results after SVPTP, mainly for pancreatic malignancies, from patient cohorts of two European high-volume-centers for pancreatic surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Mortality was set as the primary outcome and morbidity (complications according to Clavien-Dindo) as the secondary outcome. RESULTS A SVPTP was performed in 92 patients, predominantly with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (78.3%). In all cases, the splenic vessels could be preserved. In 59 patients, the decision to total pancreatectomy was made intraoperatively. Among these, the most common reason for total pancreatectomy was risk of POPF (78%). The 30-day mortality was 2.2%. Major complications (≥ IIIb according to Clavien-Dindo) occurred in 18.5% within 30 postoperative days. There were no complications directly related to the spleen and vascular preservation procedure. A tumor-negative resection margin was achieved in 71.8%. CONCLUSION We could demonstrate the technical feasibility and safety of SVPTP even in patients mainly with pancreatic malignancies. In addition to potential immunologic and oncologic advantages, we believe a major benefit of this procedure is preservation of gastric venous outflow. We consider SVPTP to be indicated in patients at high risk for POPF, in patients with multilocular IPMN, and in cases for extended intrapancreatic cancers.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalisvaart M, Broadhurst D, Marcon F, Pande R, Schlegel A, Sutcliffe R, Marudanayagam R, Mirza D, Chatzizacharias N, Abradelo M, Muiesan P, Isaac J, Ma YT, McConville C, Roberts K. Recurrence patterns of pancreatic cancer after pancreatoduodenectomy: systematic review and a single-centre retrospective study. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:1240-1249. [PMID: 32046922 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positive margins in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer, specifically the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) margin, are associated with worse outcomes. Local therapies targeting these margins could impact on recurrence. This study analysed recurrence-patterns to identify whether strategies to control local disease could have a meaningful impact. METHODS (I) Systematic review to define recurrence patterns and resection margin status. (II) Additional retrospective study of PD performed at our centre. RESULTS In the systematic review, 23/617 evaluated studies were included (n = 3815). Local recurrence was observed in 7-69%. SMA margin (6 studies) was positive in 15-35%. In the retrospective study (n = 204), local recurrence was more frequently observed with a positive SMA margin (66 vs.45%; p = 0.005). Furthermore, in a multivariate cox-proportional hazard model, only a positive SMA margin was associated with disease recurrence (HR 1.615; 95%CI 1.127-2.315; p = 0.009). Interestingly, median overall survival was 20 months and similar for patients who developed local only, metastases only or simultaneous recurrence (p = 0.124). CONCLUSION Local recurrence of pancreatic cancer is common and associated with similar mortality rates as those who present with simultaneous or metastatic recurrence. Involvement of the SMA margin is an independent predictor for disease progression and should be the target of future adjuvant local therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Kalisvaart
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Damian Broadhurst
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Francesca Marcon
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rupaly Pande
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Manuel Abradelo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Yuk T Ma
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christopher McConville
- School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith Roberts
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu H, Xing H, Liang L, Huang B, Li C, Lau WY, Zhou YH, Gu WM, Wang H, Chen TH, Zhang YM, Zeng YY, Pawlik TM, Wang MD, Wu MC, Shen F, Yang T. Real-world role of performance status in surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2019; 45:2360-2368. [PMID: 31543386 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) categorizes a patient with performance status (PS)-1 as advanced stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and surgical resection is not recommended. In real-world clinical practice, PS-1 is often not a contraindication to surgery for HCC. The aim of current study was to define the impact of PS on the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for HCC. METHODS 1,531 consecutive patients who underwent a curative-intent resection of HCC between 2005 and 2015 were identified using a multi-institutional database. After categorizing patients into PS-0 (n = 836) versus PS-1 (n = 695), perioperative mortality and morbidity, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. RESULTS Overall perioperative mortality and major morbidity among patients with PS-0 (n = 836) and PS-1 (n = 695) were similar (1.4% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.525 and 9.7% vs. 10.2%, P = 0.732, respectively). In contrast, median OS and RFS was worse among patients who had PS-1 versus PS-0 (34.0 vs. 107.6 months, and 20.5 vs. 60.6 months, both P < 0.001, respectively). On multivariable Cox-regression analyses, PS-1 was independently associated with worse OS (HR: 1.301, 95% CI: 1.111-1.523, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 1.184, 95% CI: 1.034-1.358, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Patients with PS-1 versus PS-0 had comparable perioperative outcomes. However, patients with PS-1 had worse long-term outcomes as PS-1 was independently associated with worse OS and RFS. Routine exclusion of HCC patients with PS-1 from surgical resection as recommended by the BCLC guidelines is not warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Xing
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin Huang
- Department of Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ya-Hao Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Pu'er People's Hospital, Yunnan, China
| | - Wei-Min Gu
- The First Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Hong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Liuyang People's Hospital, Hunan, China
| | - Ting-Hao Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Ziyang First People's Hospital, Sichuan, China
| | - Yao-Ming Zhang
- 2(nd) Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Meizhou People's Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Meizhou, China
| | - Yong-Yi Zeng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Ming-Da Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Meng-Chao Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Tian Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dal Molin M, Blackford AL, Siddiqui A, Brant A, Cho C, Rezaee N, Yu J, He J, Weiss M, Hruban RH, Wolfgang C, Goggins M. Duodenal Involvement is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients with Surgically Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:2379-2386. [PMID: 28439733 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5864-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) includes information about size and local extension of the primary tumor (T stage). The value of incorporating any local tumor extension into pancreatic staging systems has been questioned because it often is difficult to evaluate tumor extension to the peri-pancreatic soft tissues and because most carcinomas of the head of the pancreas infiltrate the intra-pancreatic common bile duct. This study sought to evaluate the prognostic implications of having PDAC with local tumor extension. METHODS A single-institution, prospectively collected database of 1128 patients who underwent surgical resection for PDAC was queried to examine the prognostic significance of extra-pancreatic tumor involvement ("no involvement," "duodenal involvement," and "extensive involvement"; e.g., gastric, colon or major vein involvement). RESULTS The median overall survival for the patients without extra-pancreatic involvement was 26 months versus 19 months for the patients with duodenal involvement and 16 months for the patients with extensive involvement (p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, duodenal and extensive involvement independently predicted increased risk of death compared with no involvement (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.57 and 1.78; 95% CI 1.25-2.55, respectively). A multivariable model combining duodenal and extensive extra-pancreatic involvement, tumor grade, lymph node ratio, and other prognostic features had the highest c-index (0.67). CONCLUSIONS Inclusion of duodenal involvement in the staging of PDAC adds independent prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Dal Molin
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Abdulrehman Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aaron Brant
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christy Cho
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Neda Rezaee
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew Weiss
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Canyilmaz E, Serdar L, Uslu GH, Soydemir G, Bahat Z, Yoney A. Evaluation of prognostic factors and survival results in pancreatic carcinomas in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 14:6573-8. [PMID: 24377570 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.11.6573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate patient characteristics, treatment modalities and prognostic factors in Turkish patients with pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 1997 and December 2012, 64 patients who presented to the Department of Radiation Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Medicine with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were evaluated. The E/K ratio of the cases was 2.4/1 and the median age was 59.6 (32-80) years, respectively. Some 11 cases (18%) were stage 1, 21 (34.4%) were stage 2, 10 (16.4%) were stage 3, and 19 (31.1%) were metastatic. RESULTS The mean follow-up time was 15.7 months (0.7-117.5) and loco-regional recurrence was noted in 11 (40.7%) who underwent surgery while metastases were observed in 41 patients (66.1%). The median overall survival (OS) was 11.2 months and the 1, 3 and 5-year OS rates were 41.7%, 9.9% and 7.9% respectively. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 5.2 month and the1, 2 and 5 year DFS were 22.6%, 7.6% and 3.8% respectively. On univariate analysis, prognostic factors affecting OS included status of the operation (p<0.001), tumor stage (p=0.008), ECOG performance status (p=0.005) and CEA level (p=0.017).On multivariate analysis, prognostic factors affecting survival included status of the operation (p=0.033) and age (p= 0.023). CONCLUSIONS In the current study, age and operation status were independent prognostic factors for overall survival with pancreatic patients. Thus, the patients early diagnosis and treatment ars essential. However, prospective studies with more patients are needed for confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emine Canyilmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey E-mail :
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhong Y, Naito Y, Cope L, Naranjo-Suarez S, Saunders T, Hong SM, Goggins MG, Herman JM, Wolfgang CL, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA. Functional p38 MAPK identified by biomarker profiling of pancreatic cancer restrains growth through JNK inhibition and correlates with improved survival. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20:6200-11. [PMID: 24963048 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-2823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Numerous biomarkers for pancreatic cancer have been reported. We determined the extent to which such biomarkers are expressed throughout metastatic progression, including those that effectively predict biologic behavior. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Biomarker profiling was performed for 35 oncoproteins in matched primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer tissues from 36 rapid autopsy patients. Proteins of significance were validated by immunolabeling in an independent sample set, and functional studies were performed in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS Most biomarkers were similarly expressed or lost in expression in most samples analyzed, and the matched primary and metastases from a specific patient were most similar to each other than to other patients. However, a subset of proteins showed extensive interpatient heterogeneity, one of which was p38 MAPK. Strong positive pp38 MAPK immunolabeling was significantly correlated with improved postresection survival by multivariate analysis (median overall survival 27.9 months, P = 0.041). In pancreatic cancer cells, inhibition of functional p38 by SB202190 increased cell proliferation in vitro in both low-serum and low-oxygen conditions. High functional p38 activity in vitro corresponded to lower levels of pJNK protein expression, and p38 inhibition resulted in increased pJNK and pMKK7 by Western blot analysis. Moreover, JNK inhibition by SP600125 or MKK7 siRNA knockdown antagonized the effects of p38 inhibition by SB202190. In vivo, SP600125 significantly decreased growth rates of xenografts with high p38 activity compared with those without p38 expression. CONCLUSIONS Functional p38 MAPK activity contributes to overall survival through JNK signaling, thus providing a rationale for JNK inhibition in pancreatic cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhong
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yoshiki Naito
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Leslie Cope
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Salvador Naranjo-Suarez
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tyler Saunders
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Michael G Goggins
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|