1
|
Dongelmans E, Erler N, Adam R, Nadalin S, Karam V, Yilmaz S, Kelly C, Pirenne J, Acarli K, Allison M, Hakeem A, Dhakshinamoorthy V, Fedaruk D, Rummo O, Kilic M, Nordin A, Fischer L, Parente A, Mirza D, Bennet W, Tokat Y, Faitot F, Antonelli BB, Berlakovich G, Patch D, Berrevoet F, Ribnikar M, Gerster T, Savier E, Gruttadauria S, Ericzon BG, Valdivieso A, Cuervas-Mons V, Perez Saborido B, Croner RS, De Carlis L, Magini G, Rossi R, Popescu I, Razvan L, Schneeberger S, Blokzijl H, Llado L, Gomez Bravo MA, Duvoux C, Mezjlík V, Oniscu GC, Pearson K, Dayangac M, Lucidi V, Detry O, Rotellar F, den Hoed C, Polak WG, Darwish Murad S. Recent outcomes of liver transplantation for Budd-Chiari syndrome: A study of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) and affiliated centers. Hepatology 2024:01515467-990000000-00750. [PMID: 38358658 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Management of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) has improved over the last decades. The main aim was to evaluate the contemporary post-liver transplantant (post-LT) outcomes in Europe. APPROACH AND RESULTS Data from all patients who underwent transplantation from 1976 to 2020 was obtained from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). Patients < 16 years with secondary BCS or HCC were excluded. Patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) before and after 2000 were compared. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified predictors of PS and GS after 2000. Supplemental data was requested from all ELTR-affiliated centers and received from 44. In all, 808 patients underwent transplantation between 2000 and 2020. One-, 5- and 10-year PS was 84%, 77%, and 68%, and GS was 79%, 70%, and 62%, respectively. Both significantly improved compared to outcomes before 2000 ( p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 50 months and retransplantation rate was 12%. Recipient age (aHR:1.04,95%CI:1.02-1.06) and MELD score (aHR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.06), especially above 30, were associated with worse PS, while male sex had better outcomes (aHR:0.63,95%CI:0.41-0.96). Donor age was associated with worse PS (aHR:1.01,95%CI:1.00-1.03) and GS (aHR:1.02,95%CI:1.01-1.03). In 353 patients (44%) with supplemental data, 33% had myeloproliferative neoplasm, 20% underwent TIPS pre-LT, and 85% used anticoagulation post-LT. Post-LT anticoagulation was associated with improved PS (aHR:0.29,95%CI:0.16-0.54) and GS (aHR:0.48,95%CI:0.29-0.81). Hepatic artery thrombosis and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occurred in 9% and 7%, while recurrent BCS was rare (3%). CONCLUSIONS LT for BCS results in excellent patient- and graft-survival. Older recipient or donor age and higher MELD are associated with poorer outcomes, while long-term anticoagulation improves both patient and graft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edo Dongelmans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rene Adam
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation Unit, Hospital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Universitätsklinik Tübingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Vincent Karam
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation Unit, Hospital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Sezai Yilmaz
- Department of Surgery, Liver Transplant Institute, Turgut Özal Medical Center, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Claire Kelly
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jacques Pirenne
- Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koray Acarli
- Department of Liver and Biliary Tract Surgery, Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Michael Allison
- Liver Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge, UK
| | - Abdul Hakeem
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Dzmitry Fedaruk
- Department of Transplantation, Minsk Scientific and Practical Center for Surgery, Transplantology and Hepatology, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Oleg Rummo
- Department of Transplantation, Minsk Scientific and Practical Center for Surgery, Transplantology and Hepatology, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Murat Kilic
- Department of Surgery, Kent Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Arno Nordin
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery Unit, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Darius Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - William Bennet
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Yaman Tokat
- Department of General Surgery, International Liver Center and Acibadem Health Care Hospitals, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Francois Faitot
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, C.H.R.U. de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Barbara B Antonelli
- General and Liver Transplant Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriela Berlakovich
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - David Patch
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Frederik Berrevoet
- Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marija Ribnikar
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Lubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Theophile Gerster
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, C.H.U. de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Eric Savier
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pitie Salpetriere university hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Palermo, Italy
- Department of Surgery and Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Bo-Göran Ericzon
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Andrés Valdivieso
- Department of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Cruces University hospital, Bilbao, Spain
| | | | - Baltasar Perez Saborido
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario "Rio Hortega", Valladolid, Spain
| | - Roland S Croner
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Magini
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Genève, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Roberta Rossi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Irinel Popescu
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laze Razvan
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Hans Blokzijl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Laura Llado
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Christophe Duvoux
- Department of Medical Liver Transplant Unit and Liver, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - Vladimír Mezjlík
- Department of Transplantation, Center of cardiovascular surgery and transplantations, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Gabriel C Oniscu
- Edinburgh Transplant Center, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburg, UK
| | - Kelsey Pearson
- Edinburgh Transplant Center, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburg, UK
| | - Murat Dayangac
- Center for Organ Transplantation, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Valerio Lucidi
- Department of abdominal surgery, Unit of Hepato-biliary surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Detry
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Caroline den Hoed
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wojciech G Polak
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sarwa Darwish Murad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herrmann J, Ording-Müller LS, Franchi-Abella S, Verhagen MV, McGuirk SP, Dammann E, Bokkers RPH, Clapuyt PRM, Deganello A, Tandoi F, de Goyet JDV, Hebelka H, de Lange C, Lozach C, Marra P, Mirza D, Kalicinski P, Patsch JM, Perucca G, Tsiflikas I, Renz DM, Schweiger B, Spada M, Toso S, Viremouneix L, Woodley H, Fischer L, Petit P, Brinkert F. European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (1) pre-transplant evaluation. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:260-268. [PMID: 37985493 PMCID: PMC10830904 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05797-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment in end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element for successful organ-transplantation to assist surgical planning. So far, only limited data regarding the best radiological approach to prepare children for liver transplantation is available. OBJECTIVES In an attempt to harmonize imaging surrounding pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology (ESPR) Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phase. This paper reports the responses on preoperative imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS An online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey. From 2018 to 2020, the participating centers collectively conducted 1,524 transplantations, with a median of 20 transplantations per center per annum (range, 8-60). RESULTS Most sites (64%) consider ultrasound their preferred modality to define anatomy and to plan surgery in children before liver transplantation, and additional cross-sectional imaging is only used to answer specific questions (computed tomography [CT], 90.9%; magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], 54.5%). One-third of centers (31.8%) rely primarily on CT for pre-transplant evaluation. Imaging protocols differed substantially regarding applied CT scan ranges, number of contrast phases (range 1-4 phases), and applied MRI techniques. CONCLUSION Diagnostic imaging is generally used in the work-up of children before liver transplantation. Substantial differences were noted regarding choice of modalities and protocols. We have identified starting points for future optimization and harmonization of the imaging approach to multicenter studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen Herrmann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | | | - Martijn V Verhagen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Simon P McGuirk
- Department of Radiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elena Dammann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Reinoud P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Francesco Tandoi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Hanna Hebelka
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Charlotte de Lange
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecile Lozach
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Marra
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Di Bergamo: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Piotr Kalicinski
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Organ Transplantation, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Janina M Patsch
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giulia Perucca
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Ilias Tsiflikas
- Department of Radiology, University Clinic of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diane M Renz
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hannover Medical School Hospital, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernd Schweiger
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marco Spada
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Liver and Kidney Transplantation, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Rome, Italy
| | - Seema Toso
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Loïc Viremouneix
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Helen Woodley
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Visceral Transplant Surgery, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philippe Petit
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital de La Timone: Hopital de La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Florian Brinkert
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Herrmann J, Petit P, Franchi-Abella S, Verhagen MV, McGuirk SP, Dammann E, Bokkers RPH, Clapuyt PRM, Deganello A, Tandoi F, de Ville de Goyet J, Hebelka H, de Lange C, Lozach C, Marra P, Mirza D, Kaliciński P, Patsch JM, Perucca G, Tsiflikas I, Renz DM, Schweiger B, Spada M, Toso S, Viremouneix L, Woodley H, Fischer L, Ording-Müller LS, Brinkert F. European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (2) intraoperative imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:269-275. [PMID: 38216682 PMCID: PMC10830587 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05840-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of intraoperative and postoperative complications. So far, only limited data regarding the best radiological approach to monitor children during liver transplantation is available. OBJECTIVE To harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra- and postoperative phase. This paper reports the responses related to intraoperative imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey. RESULTS Intraoperative ultrasound (US) is used by all sites to assess the quality of the vascular anastomosis in order to ensure optimal perfusion of the liver transplant. Vessel depiction is commonly achieved using color Doppler (95.3%). Additional US-based techniques are employed by fewer centers (power angio mode, 28.6%; B-flow, 19%; contrast-enhanced US, 14.3%). Most centers prefer a collaborative approach, with surgeons responsible for probe handling, while radiologists operate the US machine (47.6%). Less commonly, the intraoperative US is performed by the surgeon alone (28.6%) or by the radiologist alone (23.8%). Timing of US, imaging frequency, and documentation practices vary among centers. CONCLUSION Intraoperative US is consistently utilized across all sites during pediatric liver transplantation. However, considerable variations were observed in terms of the US setup, technique preferences, timing of controls, and documentation practices. These differences provide valuable insights for future optimization and harmonization studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen Herrmann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Philippe Petit
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital de La Timone: Hopital de La Timone, Marseille, France
| | | | - Martijn V Verhagen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Simon P McGuirk
- Department of Radiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elena Dammann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Reinoud P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Francesco Tandoi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Hanna Hebelka
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Charlotte de Lange
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital: Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset Drottning Silvias Barn- Och Ungdomssjukhus, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecile Lozach
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Marra
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Di Bergamo: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, University of Milano-Bicocca, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Piotr Kaliciński
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Organ Transplantation, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Janina M Patsch
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giulia Perucca
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Ilias Tsiflikas
- Department of Radiology, University Clinic of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diane M Renz
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hannover Medical School: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernd Schweiger
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marco Spada
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Liver and Kidney Transplantation, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Rome, Italy
| | - Seema Toso
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals: Hopitaux Universitaires Geneve, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Loïc Viremouneix
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Helen Woodley
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Visceral Transplant Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lil-Sofie Ording-Müller
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital: Oslo Universitetssykehus Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Florian Brinkert
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herrmann J, Ording-Müller LS, Franchi-Abella S, Verhagen MV, McGuirk SP, Dammann E, Bokkers RPH, Clapuyt PRM, Deganello A, Tandoi F, de Ville de Goyet J, Hebelka H, de Lange C, Lozach C, Marra P, Mirza D, Kalicinski P, Patsch JM, Perucca G, Tsiflikas I, Renz DM, Schweiger B, Spada M, Toso S, Viremouneix L, Woodley H, Fischer L, Petit P, Brinkert F. Correction to: European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (1) pre‑transplant evaluation. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:373-374. [PMID: 38194105 PMCID: PMC10830710 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05843-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen Herrmann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | | | - Martijn V Verhagen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Simon P McGuirk
- Department of Radiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elena Dammann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Reinoud P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Francesco Tandoi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Hanna Hebelka
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Charlotte de Lange
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecile Lozach
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Marra
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Di Bergamo: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Piotr Kalicinski
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Organ Transplantation, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Janina M Patsch
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giulia Perucca
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Ilias Tsiflikas
- Department of Radiology, University Clinic of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diane M Renz
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hannover Medical School Hospital, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernd Schweiger
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marco Spada
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Liver and Kidney Transplantation, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Rome, Italy
| | - Seema Toso
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Loïc Viremouneix
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Helen Woodley
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Visceral Transplant Surgery, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philippe Petit
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital de La TimoneHopital de La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Florian Brinkert
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dammann E, Ording-Müller LS, Franchi-Abella S, Verhagen MV, McGuirk SP, Bokkers RPH, Clapuyt PRM, Deganello A, Tandoi F, de Ville de Goyet J, Hebelka H, de Lange C, Lozach C, Marra P, Mirza D, Kaliciński P, Patsch JM, Perucca G, Tsiflikas I, Renz DM, Schweiger B, Spada M, Toso S, Viremouneix L, Woodley H, Fischer L, Brinkert F, Petit P, Herrmann J. European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (3) postoperative imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:276-284. [PMID: 38285190 PMCID: PMC10830633 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05842-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of postoperative complications. So far, limited data is available regarding the best radiologic approach to monitor children after liver transplantation. OBJECTIVE To harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases. This paper reports the responses related to postoperative imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey. RESULTS All sites commence ultrasound (US) monitoring within 24 h after liver transplantation. Monitoring frequency varies across sites, ranging from every 8 h to 72 h in early, and from daily to sporadic use in late postoperative phases. Predefined US protocols are used by 73% of sites. This commonly includes gray scale, color Doppler, and quantitative flow assessment. Alternative flow imaging techniques, contrast-enhanced US, and elastography are applied at 31.8%, 18.2%, and 63.6% of sites, respectively. Computed tomography is performed at 86.4% of sites when clarification is needed. Magnetic resonance imaging is used for selected cases at 36.4% of sites, mainly for assessment of biliary abnormalities or when blood tests are abnormal. CONCLUSION Diagnostic imaging is extensively used for postoperative surveillance of children after liver transplantation. While US is generally prioritized, substantial differences were noted in US protocol, timing, and monitoring frequency. The study highlights potential areas for future optimization and standardization of imaging, essential for conducting multicenter studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Dammann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lil-Sofie Ording-Müller
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital: Oslo universitetssykehus Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Martijn V Verhagen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Simon P McGuirk
- Department of Radiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Reinoud P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Francesco Tandoi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Hanna Hebelka
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Charlotte de Lange
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecile Lozach
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Marra
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Piotr Kaliciński
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Organ Transplantation, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Janina M Patsch
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giulia Perucca
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Ilias Tsiflikas
- Department of Radiology, University Clinic of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diane M Renz
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hannover Medical School: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernd Schweiger
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marco Spada
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Liver and Kidney Transplantation, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Seema Toso
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals: Hopitaux Universitaires Geneve, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Loïc Viremouneix
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Helen Woodley
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Visceral Transplant Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Brinkert
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg- Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philippe Petit
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Marseille, France
| | - Jochen Herrmann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ahuja M, Joshi K, Coldham C, Muiesan P, Dasari B, Abradelo M, Marudanayagam R, Mirza D, Isaac J, Bartlett D, Chatzizacharias NA, Sutcliffe RP, Roberts KJ. Hepatic vein reconstruction during hepatectomy: A feasible and underused technique. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024:S1499-3872(24)00002-X. [PMID: 38278672 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Ahuja
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kunal Joshi
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chris Coldham
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paulo Muiesan
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bobby Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Manuel Abradelo
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Bartlett
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nikolaos A Chatzizacharias
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Åberg F, Sallinen V, Tuominen S, Adam R, Karam V, Mirza D, Heneghan MA, Line PD, Bennet W, Ericzon BG, Grat M, Lodge P, Rasmussen A, Schmelzle M, Thorburn D, Fondevila C, Helanterä I, Nordin A. Cyclosporine vs. tacrolimus after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis - a propensity score-matched intention-to-treat analysis. J Hepatol 2024; 80:99-108. [PMID: 37722533 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There is controversy regarding the optimal calcineurin inhibitor type after liver transplant(ation) (LT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We compared tacrolimus with cyclosporine in a propensity score-matched intention-to-treat analysis based on registries representing nearly all LTs in Europe and the US. METHODS From the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), we included adult patients with PSC undergoing a primary LT between 2000-2020. Patients initially treated with cyclosporine were propensity score-matched 1:3 with those initially treated with tacrolimus. The primary outcomes were patient and graft survival rates. RESULTS The propensity score-matched sample comprised 399 cyclosporine-treated and 1,197 tacrolimus-treated patients with PSC. During a median follow-up of 7.4 years (IQR 2.3-12.8, 12,579.2 person-years), there were 480 deaths and 231 re-LTs. The initial tacrolimus treatment was superior to cyclosporine in terms of patient and graft survival, with 10-year patient survival estimates of 72.8% for tacrolimus and 65.2% for cyclosporine (p <0.001) and 10-year graft survival estimates of 62.4% and 53.8% (p <0.001), respectively. These findings were consistent in the subgroups according to age, sex, registry (ELTR vs. SRTR), time period of LT, MELD score, and diabetes status. The acute rejection rates were similar between groups. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, tacrolimus (hazard ratio 0.72, p <0.001) and mycophenolate use (hazard ratio 0.82, p = 0.03) were associated with a reduced risk of graft loss or death, whereas steroid use was not significant. CONCLUSIONS Tacrolimus is associated with better patient and graft survival rates than cyclosporine and should be the standard calcineurin inhibitor used after LT for patients with PSC. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS The optimal calcineurin inhibitor to use after liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis has yet to be firmly established. Since randomized trials with long follow-up are unlikely to be performed, multicontinental long-term registry data are essential in informing clinical practices. Our study supports the practice of using tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine in the initial immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. The retrospective registry-based design is a limitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Åberg
- Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Transplantation and Liver Surgery Unit, Finland.
| | - Ville Sallinen
- Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Transplantation and Liver Surgery Unit, Finland
| | | | - René Adam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université, Paris-Sud, Inserm U 935, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincent Karam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université, Paris-Sud, Inserm U 935, Villejuif, France
| | - Darius Mirza
- The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Medical Center, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Pål-Dag Line
- Rikshospitalet, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - William Bennet
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Transplant Institute, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Bo-Göran Ericzon
- Karolinska Institutet, CLINTEC, Division of Transplantation Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michal Grat
- Medical University of Warsaw, Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Peter Lodge
- St James & Seacroft University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Allan Rasmussen
- University Hospital Copenhagen, Department for Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Hannover Medical School, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | - Ilkka Helanterä
- Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Transplantation and Liver Surgery Unit, Finland
| | - Arno Nordin
- Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Transplantation and Liver Surgery Unit, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rehman S, Patel I, Bartlett D, Mirza D. Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy in the 2020s: Recent Institutional Experience and a Narrative Review of Current Evidence. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6578. [PMID: 37892716 PMCID: PMC10607154 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Distal pancreatectomy is a standard treatment for tumours of the pancreatic body and tail. Minimally invasive techniques for all types of pancreatic tumours (benign and malignant) are being established, while concerns regarding oncological safety, cost effectiveness and learning curves are being explored with prospective studies. This paper presents our unit's data in the context of the above concerns and provides a relevant narrative review of the current literature. (2) Methods: Data were collected retrospectively between 2014 and 2021 for all adult patients who underwent elective distal pancreatectomy in our tertiary care referral HPB Unit. Data on demographics, underlying pathology, perioperative variables and post-operative complications were collected and reported using descriptive statistics. On review of the Miami guidelines, four important but less validated areas regarding distal pancreatectomy are presented in light of the current evidence; these are recent randomised controlled trials, oncological safety, cost effectiveness and learning curves in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). (3) Results: 207 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy in total from 2014-2021, with 114 and 93 patients undergoing open and minimally invasive techniques, respectively. 44 patients were operated on for PDAC in the open vs. 17 in the minimally invasive group. The operative time was 212 min for the open and 248 min for the minimally invasive group. The incidence of pancreatic fistula was higher in the minimally invasive group vs. the open group (16% vs. 4%). (4) Conclusions: Our unit's data conform with the published literature, including three randomised control trials. These published studies will not only pave the way for establishing minimally invasive techniques for suitable patients, but also define their limitations and indications. Future studies will inform us about the oncological safety, cost effectiveness, overall survival and learning curves regarding patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Rehman
- Liver Transplant and HPB Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Ishaan Patel
- Liver Transplant and HPB Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - David Bartlett
- Liver Transplant and HPB Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Hon Professor of HPB and Transplant Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Patel I, Rehman S, McKay S, Bartlett D, Mirza D. Use of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5536. [PMID: 37685603 PMCID: PMC10488819 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) afflict a significant proportion of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), ranging from 25% to 30% of patients throughout the course of the disease. In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in the application of near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging as an intraoperative imaging technique for liver surgery. The utilisation of NIRF-guided liver surgery, facilitated by the administration of fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG), has gained traction in numerous medical institutions worldwide. This innovative approach aims to enhance lesion differentiation and provide valuable guidance for surgical margins. The use of ICG, particularly in minimally invasive surgery, has the potential to improve lesion detection rates, increase the likelihood of achieving R0 resection, and enable anatomically guided resections. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of ICG, such as its low specificity. Consequently, there has been a growing demand for the development of tumour-specific fluorescent probes and the advancement of camera systems, which are expected to address these concerns and further refine the accuracy and reliability of intraoperative fluorescence imaging in liver surgery. While NIRF imaging has been extensively studied in patients with CRLM, it is worth noting that a significant proportion of published research has predominantly focused on the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we present a comprehensive literature review of the existing literature pertaining to intraoperative fluorescence imaging in minimally invasive surgery for CRLM. Moreover, our analysis places specific emphasis on the techniques employed in liver resection using ICG, with a focus on tumour detection in minimal invasive surgery (MIS). Additionally, we delve into recent developments in this field and offer insights into future perspectives for further advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishaan Patel
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Third Floor Nuffield House, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Saad Rehman
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Third Floor Nuffield House, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Siobhan McKay
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Third Floor Nuffield House, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - David Bartlett
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Third Floor Nuffield House, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Hon Professor of HPB and Transplant Surgery, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pandrowala S, Patkar S, Goel M, Mirza D, Mathur SK. Surgical resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma and those beyond BCLC: systematic review with proposed management algorithm. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:144. [PMID: 37041364 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02881-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for the sixth most common cancer and ranks third in mortality worldwide with inhomogeneity in terms of resection for advanced-stage disease. METHODS A systematic review of published literature using the PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar databases from 1995 to 2020 was conducted to identify studies that reported outcomes of resection for solitary HCC > 10 cm, BCLC B/C, and multinodular HCC. Our aim was to assess overall survival for resection, identify poor prognostic factors, and to compare it to trans-arterial chemotherapy (TACE) where data was available. RESULTS Eighty-nine articles were included after a complete database search in the systematic review as per our predefined criteria. Analysis revealed a 5-year overall survival of 33.5% for resection of HCC > 10 cm, 41.7% for BCLC B, 23.3% for BCLC C, and 36.6% for multinodular HCC. Peri-operative mortality ranged from 0 to 6.9%. Studies comparing resection versus TACE for BCLC B/C had a survival of 40% versus 17%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our systematic review justifies hepatic resection wherever feasible for hepatocellular carcinomas > 10 cm, BCLC B, BCLC C, and multinodular tumors. In addition, we identified and proposed an algorithm with five poor prognostic criteria in this group of patients who may benefit from adjuvant TACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saneya Pandrowala
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - Darius Mirza
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham and Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S K Mathur
- Zen Digestive Disease Center, Zen Hospital, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Reddy MS, Mathur SK, Sudhindran S, Gupta S, Rela M, Soin AS, Mirza D, Asthana S, Chinthakindi M, Jacob M, Kumaran V, Modi P, Mohanka R, Narasimhan G, Pal S, Pamecha V, Rastogi A, Saigal S, Wadhawan M. National Liver Allocation Policy-Consensus Document by the Liver Transplantation Society of India for a Nationally Uniform System of Allocation of Deceased Donor Liver Grafts. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2023; 13:303-318. [PMID: 36950486 PMCID: PMC10025588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is increasing in India and now constitutes nearly one-third of all liver transplantation procedures performed in the country. There is currently no uniform national system of allocation of deceased donor livers. Methods A national task force consisting of 19 clinicians involved in liver transplantation from across the country was constituted under the aegis of the Liver Transplantation Society of India to develop a consensus document addressing the above issues using a modified Delphi process of consensus development. Results The National Liver Allocation Policy consensus document includes 46 statements covering all aspects of DDLT, including minimum listing criteria, listing for acute liver failure, DDLT wait-list management, system of prioritisation based on clinical urgency for adults and children, guidelines for allocation of paediatric organs and allocation priorities for liver grafts recovered from public sector hospitals. Conclusion This document is the first step in the setting up of a nationally consistent policy of deceased donor liver allocation.
Collapse
Key Words
- ACLF, acute on chronic liver failure
- ALF, acute liver failure
- CLD, chronic liver disease
- CSS, Clinical Severity Score
- CSS-P, Clinical Severity Score for Paediatric Recipients
- DD, deceased donation
- DDLG, deceased donor liver grafts
- DDLT, deceased donor liver transplantation
- Delphi process
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- LDLT, living donor liver transplantation
- LT, liver transplantation
- MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease
- N-LAP, National Liver Allocation Policy
- NABL, National Accreditation Board for Testing & Calibration Laboratories
- PELD, Paediatric Model for End-Stage Liver Disease
- PuSH, Public Sector Hospital
- WL, waiting list
- acute liver failure
- paediatric
- public sector hospital
- variant syndrome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Mohamed Rela
- Dr Rela Institute & Medical Center, Chennai, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Pranjal Modi
- Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Ravi Mohanka
- Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital & Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Sujoy Pal
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | - Manav Wadhawan
- BL Kapoor-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ashwat E, Kaltenmeier C, Liu H, Reddy D, Thompson A, Dharmayan S, Ayloo S, Nadalin S, Ciccarelli O, Xu Q, Adam R, Karam V, Zieniewicz K, Mirza D, Heneghan M, Romagnoli R, Paul A, Cherqui D, Pratschke J, Boudjema K, Schemmer P, Rodriguez FSJ, Lodge P, de Simone P, Bachellier P, Fronek J, Fondevila C, Molinari M. Validation of the Liver Transplant Risk Score in Europe. Br J Surg 2023; 110:302-305. [PMID: 36018309 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The Liver Transplant Risk Score (LTRS) is a simple clinical instrument developed to predict post liver transplant outcomes based on patient characteristics measured at the time of listing. The LTRS was developed using data of adult patients transplanted in the United States. In this study, we validated the performance of the LTRS in a cohort of patients transplanted in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eishan Ashwat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christof Kaltenmeier
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dheera Reddy
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ann Thompson
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Stalin Dharmayan
- Department of Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Subhashini Ayloo
- Department of Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tubingen University, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Qingyong Xu
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rene Adam
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincent Karam
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Renato Romagnoli
- Centro di Trapianti di Fegato, AOU Citta' Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Andreas Paul
- Department of Surgery, CUK GHS Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Surgery, CHU Rennes, Hôpital de Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | - Peter Schemmer
- Department of Surgery, Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Lodge
- Department of Surgery, St James's University Hospital and Seacroft University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Jiri Fronek
- Transplantcenter, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- Hospital Universitario La Paz (Department of General & Digestive Surgery), Instituto de Investigación La Paz (IdiPAZ), Centro de Investigaciones Biomedicas de la Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Michele Molinari
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Joshi K, Abradelo M, Bartlett DC, Chatzizacharias N, Dasari BV, Isaac J, Marudanayagam R, Mirza D, Roberts K, Sutcliffe RP. Potential clinical utility of intraoperative fluid amylase measurement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023; 27:189-194. [PMID: 36788121 PMCID: PMC10201058 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.22-083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a source of major morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and treatment of POPF is mandatory to improve patient outcomes and clinical risk scores may be ombined with postoperative drain fluid amylase (DFA) values to stratify patients. The aim of this pilot study was to etermine if intraoperative fluid amylase (IFA) values correlate with DFA1 and POPF. Methods In patients undergoing PD from February to November 2020, intraoperative samples of intra-abdominal fluid adjacent to the pancreatic anastomosis were taken and sent for fluid amylase measurement prior to abdominal closure. Data regarding patient demographics, postoperative DFA values, complications, and mortality were prospectively collected. Results Data were obtained for 52 patients with a median alternative Fistula Risk Score (aFRS) of 9.9. Postoperative complications occurred in 20 (38.5%) patients (five Clavien grade ≥ 3). There were eight POPFs and two patients died (pneumonia/sepsis). There was a significant correlation between IFA and DFA1 (R2 = 0.713; p < 0.001) and DFA3 (p < 0.001), and the median IFA was higher in patients with POPF than patients without (1,232.5 vs. 122; p = 0.0003). IFA > 260 U/L predicted POPF with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 88.0%, 75.0%, 39.0%, and 97.0%, respectively. The incidence of POPF was 43.0% in high-risk (high aFRS/IFA) and 0% in lowrisk patients (low aFRS/IFA). Conclusions IFA correlated with POPF and may be a useful adjunct to clinical risk scores to stratify patients during PD. Larger, prospective studies are needed to determine whether IFA has clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunal Joshi
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Manuel Abradelo
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - John Isaac
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Darius Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pande R, Chughtai S, Ahuja M, Brown R, Dasari B, Marudanayagam R, Mirza D, Roberts K, Sutcliffe R, Isaac J, Chatzizacharias N. HPB P14 Para-aortic lymph node involvement should not be a contraindication to resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac404.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Para-aortic lymph node (PALN) involvement is staged as metastatic disease but the literature is conflicting with no consensus on management. Aim: To investigate the prognostic significance of PALN metastases on the oncological outcomes after resection for PDAC.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study of prospectively maintained data of pancreatectomies for PDAC between 2011–2020. Statistical comparison between PALN+ and PALN- subgroups, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.
Results
81 cases had PALN sampling, 17 (21%) were positive. OS and DFS were comparable between PALN+ and PALN- patients (OS: 13.2 vs 18.8 months, p=0.161; DFS: 13 vs 16.4, p=0.179). No difference in OS or DFS was identified between PALN+ and PALN- patients when they received chemotherapy (neoadjuvant or adjuvant). On the contrary, when patients did not receive chemotherapy, PALN disease had substantially shorter OS (5.5 vs 14.2 months; p=0.015) and DFS (4.4 vs 9.8 months; p<0.001). PALN involvement was not identified as an independent predictor for OS after multivariable analysis, while it was for DFS doubling the risk of recurrence.
Conclusions
PALN involvement does not affect OS when patients complete the multimodal treatment pathway and should not be considered as a contraindication to resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupaly Pande
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Shafiq Chughtai
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Manish Ahuja
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Brown
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Bobby Dasari
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | | | - Darius Mirza
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Powell-BRett S, Giovinazzo F, Nutu O, Parente A, Kadam P, Sutcliffe R, Marudanayagam R, Bartlett D, Dasari B, Mirza D, Raza S, Roberts K, Chatzizacharias N. HPB P04 The DISSECT trial, ‘The effect of periaDventitIal SMA diSsECTion on margin status during pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer’ Results of safety and feasibility pilot study. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac404.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Survival following pancreatic cancer resection remains poor despite advances in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. The incidence of positive margin status (R1) is high and an R1 resection is associated with poorer survival. The most commonly positive margin is the SMA, accounting for between 47–77% of R1 resections. Periadventitial dissection of the SMA includes the lymphoneural tissue around the adventitia in addition to the ‘mesopancreas’ in the resection specimen and is used to varying extent across different centres. Theoretically this technique should reduce R1 resection rate, however, there is a lack of prospective evidence in the published literature.
Methods
The DISSECT trial is a single centre, randomised control trial. All patients with a resectable as per NCCN staging criteria head of pancreas tumour are randomised to either ‘periadventitial SMA dissection’ or ‘no periadventitial SMA dissection’ (1:1 block randomisation, sealed envelope system). A standardised technique for length and circumference of dissection is used and intra-operative photography with blinded assessment of dissection status ensures quality control. This safety and feasibility stage assesses recruitment, technique and complications and will be followed by a study powered to detect the primary outcome of reduction in positive SMA margin status. Primary outcomes to be assessed in the fully powered study will be the SMA margin status as detailed by the AJCC 8th edition. Secondary outcomes are status of other margins, length of stay, complications, overall and disease-free survival, complications, and adjuvant treatment details. These are assessed prospectively by an investigator blinded to the study arm.
Results
For the feasibility stage, the following criteria were set to proceed: recruitment of 20 patients in 6 months, at least 80% of recruited patients to undergo correct arm of randomisation, and an increase in complication rate of no more than 10%. Within the first 6 months, 32 patients were successfully recruited and randomised. 6 were excluded post-randomisation but before SMA approach (N=2 cancelled and not re-booked, N=2 abandoned after opening, N=2 converted to total pancreatectomy). N=3 were eligible but not recruited, (2 refused after approach and 1 was missed due to research team capacity). N=25 (96.2%) underwent their allocated study arm (confirmed by blinded photo assessment). For potentially procedure related complications (SMA bleed, post-operative haemorrhage, chyle leak, collection, and anastomotic leak) there was an overall rate of 38.5%, with no significant difference between the 2 arms (42.9% in No SMA dissection arm and 33.3% in the SMA dissection arm). There were no incidences of SMA branch bleed in the SMA dissection arm and a single post-operative haemorrhage in the SMA dissection arm that was due to a mesenteric venous bleed.
Conclusions
The DISSECT trial is a randomised controlled trial that aims to evaluate the use of a standardised technique of periadventitial SMA dissection to reduce the rate of R1 resection in early stages of pancreatic cancer. The feasibility and safety pilot is complete and demonstrates successful recruitment and randomisation, excellent adherence to randomisation arm and no operative concerns from the surgical team. The study will now proceed to full recruitment with complications and blinded photo reviews for quality control assessed contemporaneously. Primary and secondary outcomes will be recorded prospectively by a member of the research team blinded to randomisation arm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Powell-BRett
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Francesco Giovinazzo
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Oanisa Nutu
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Alessandro Parente
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Prashant Kadam
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - David Bartlett
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Bobby Dasari
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Syed Raza
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ahuja M, Pande R, Raza SS, Bartlett DC, Dasari B, Marudanayagam R, Mirza D, Roberts KJ, Issac J, Sutcliffe RP, Chatzizacharias NA. HPB P49 Vein wall invasion is a more reliable predictor of oncological outcomes than vein related surgical margins after pancreaticoduodenectomy for early stages of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac404.144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with vein resection is the only potentially curative option for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with venous involvement. The aim of our study was to assess the oncological prognostic significance of the different variables of venous involvement in patients undergoing PD for resectable and borderline resectable with venous only involvement (BR-V) PDAC.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained PD database from 2011–2020 was performed. Standard descriptive statistical analysis; statistical comparisons with the use of the appropriate test; survival analysis with the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence (LR); risk analysis for separate surgicalmargins with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model were used.
Results
One hundred and five of 372 patients (28%) required vein resection and vein wall involvement was identified in 37% of those. More vein resections were performed in female patients and as expected for BR-V disease.
OS, DFS and LR were significantly longer after R0 resection, irrespective of the need for a venous resection. Following analysis of separate surgical margins, the vein groove and the vein transection margins (the latter only applicable in patients that had a venous resection) were not identified as predictors of oncological outcomes. On the contrary, vein wall invasion was an independent predictor of OS (HR:1.947, CI: 1.228–3.089, p=0.005), DFS (HR: 2.169, CI: 1.306–3.602, p=0.003) and LR (HR: 2.365, CI: 1.089–5.133, p=0.030) after PD with venous resection.
Conclusions
Vein wall tumour invasion may be a more reliable predictor of oncological outcomes compared to traditionally reported parameters. Future studies should focus on possible pre-operative investigations that could identify these cases and management pathways that could yield survival benefit, such as the use of neoadjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Ahuja
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Rupaly Pande
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Bobby Dasari
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | | | - Darius Mirza
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | | | - John Issac
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pande R, Hodson J, Chatzizacharias N, Sutcliffe R, Bartlett D, Marudanayagam R, Mirza D, Isaac J, Roberts K. HPB P59 Is the lymph node ratio a relevant prognostic score neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer? Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac404.154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Lymph node ratio (LNR) is a strong prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer (PDAC). In recent years, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) has increased, where it is associated with a higher rate of N0 resections, compared with a surgery first approach. The prognostic accuracy of the LNR after NAT has not been assessed.
Methods
Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 2008–2020 of all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC. Basic demographics, pathological and clinical outcomes were analysed using standard statistical tests. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.
Results
Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 2008–2020 of all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC. Basic demographics, pathological and clinical outcomes were analysed using standard statistical tests. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.
Conclusions
NAT reduces the predictive accuracy of the LNR in resected pancreatic cancer; alternative prognostic models will require development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupaly Pande
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - James Hodson
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | | | - Robert Sutcliffe
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - David Bartlett
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | | | - Darius Mirza
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
- University of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hall L, Osei-Bordom D, Hodson J, Joshi K, Austen L, Bartlett D, Isaac J, Mirza D, Marudanayagam R, Roberts K, Dasari B, Chatzizacharias N, Sutcliffe R. HPB P16 Impact of Frailty on Short-term Outcomes after Laparoscopic and Open Hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac404.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Although laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is associated with improved short-term outcomes compared to open hepatectomy (OH), it is unknown whether frail patients also benefit from LH. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes after LH and OH.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent LH and OH between January 2011 and December 2018 were identified from a prospective database. Frailty was assessed using the modified Frailty Index (mFI), with patients scoring mFI ≥ 1 deemed to be frail.
Results
Of 1826 patients, 34.7% (N=634) were frail and 18.6% (N=340) were elderly (≥ 75 years). Frail patients had significantly higher 90-day mortality (6.6% vs. 2.9%, p<0.001) and postoperative complications (36.3% vs. 26.1%, p<0.001) than those who were not frail, effects that were independent of patient age on multivariate analysis. For those undergoing minor resections, the benefits of LH vs. OH were similar for frail and non-frail patients. Length of hospital stay was 53% longer in OH (vs. LH) in frail patients, compared to 58% longer in the subgroup of non-frail patients.
Conclusions
Frailty is independently associated with inferior postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy. However, the benefits of laparoscopic (compared to open) hepatectomy are similar for frail and non-frail patients. Frailty should not be a contraindication to laparoscopic minor hepatectomy in carefully selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lewis Hall
- University of Birmingham, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Osei-Bordom
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - James Hodson
- Department of Medical Statistics, Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Kunal Joshi
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Luke Austen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - David Bartlett
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Bobby Dasari
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kelgeri C, Couper M, Gupte GL, Brant A, Patel M, Johansen L, Valamparampil J, Ong E, Hartog H, Perera MTPR, Mirza D, van Mourik I, Sharif K, Hartley J. Clinical Spectrum of Children with Acute Hepatitis of Unknown Cause. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:611-619. [PMID: 35830627 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2206704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since January 2022, there has been an increase in reports of cases of acute hepatitis of unknown cause in children. Although cases have been reported across multiple continents, most have been reported in the United Kingdom. Investigations are ongoing to identify the causative agent or agents. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study involving children referred to a single pediatric liver-transplantation center in the United Kingdom between January 1 and April 11, 2022. These children were 10 years of age or younger and had hepatitis that met the case definition of the U.K. Health Security Agency for confirmed acute hepatitis that was not hepatitis A through E and did not have a metabolic, inherited or genetic, congenital, or mechanical cause, in the context of a serum aminotransferase level greater than 500 IU per liter. We reviewed medical records and documented demographic characteristics, clinical features, and results of liver biochemical, serologic, and molecular tests for hepatotropic and other viruses, as well as radiologic and clinical outcomes. The outcomes were classified as an improving condition, liver transplantation, or death. RESULTS A total of 44 children had hepatitis that met the confirmed case definition, and most were previously healthy. The median age was 4 years (range, 1 to 7). Common presenting features were jaundice (in 93% of the children), vomiting (in 54%), and diarrhea (in 32%). Among the 30 patients who underwent molecular testing for human adenovirus, 27 (90%) were positive. Fulminant liver failure developed in 6 patients (14%), all of whom received a liver transplant. None of the patients died. All the children, including the 6 who received liver transplants, were discharged home. CONCLUSIONS In this series involving 44 young children with acute hepatitis of uncertain cause, human adenovirus was isolated in most of the children, but its role in the pathogenesis of this illness has not been established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chayarani Kelgeri
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Couper
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Girish L Gupte
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Brant
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mitul Patel
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Johansen
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Valamparampil
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Evelyn Ong
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Hermien Hartog
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - M T P R Perera
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Indra van Mourik
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Khalid Sharif
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Hartley
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (C.K., M.C., G.L.G., A.B., L.J., J.V., E.O., H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M., I.V.M., K.S., J.H., M.P.), the Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham (D.M.), and the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (H.H., M.T.P.R.P., D.M.) - all in Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Singh H, Kelgeri C, Passingham C, Johansen L, van Mourik I, Ong E, Perera MP, Mirza D, Sharif K, Hartley J, Gupte GL. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: A 20-year retrospective review of a tertiary paediatric liver centre. Acta Paediatr 2022; 111:1435-1440. [PMID: 35390187 DOI: 10.1111/apa.16352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is an acute deterioration of pre-existing chronic liver disease related to a precipitating event. We characterised paediatric ACLF at Birmingham Children's Hospital (BCH) utilising European Association of Liver Disease CLIF criteria, including prevalence, triggers and outcomes. METHODS All BCH patients from 2000 to 2020 with CLD who underwent initial liver transplant or died on the transplant waiting list or whilst too unwell to be listed were reviewed. RESULTS From 2000 to 2020, 24 (4%) children with ACLF were identified. Death occurred in 18 (75%). Transplant occurred in 9 (36%), 3 of which died. ACLF triggers were sepsis organism negative 11 (46%), sepsis organism positive 8 (33%) and GI bleed 5 (17%). Bilirubin at the time of transplant/death in those with ACLF who lived compared with those who died was 529 umol/L (381) versus 665 (210) (p=0.38), creatinine 138 umol/L (147) versus 67 (46) (p=0.41), PT 33 sec (14) versus (32 (15) (p = 0.72), Grade 3, 4 hepatic encephalopathy 1 (17%) versus 10 (56%) (p = 0.17), vasopressor use 1 (17%) versus 17 (94%) (p = 0.001) and ventilation 3 (50%) versus 17 (94%) (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION Acute-on-chronic liver failure whilst infrequent has high rates of mortality. The use of vasopressors and ventilation is more frequent in those who die from ACLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harveen Singh
- Liver Unit Birmingham Children’s Hospital Birmingham UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Evelyn Ong
- Liver Unit Birmingham Children’s Hospital Birmingham UK
| | - M.Thamara P.R. Perera
- Liver Unit Birmingham Children’s Hospital Birmingham UK
- Women's Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Liver Unit Birmingham UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Liver Unit Birmingham Children’s Hospital Birmingham UK
- Women's Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Liver Unit Birmingham UK
| | - Khalid Sharif
- Liver Unit Birmingham Children’s Hospital Birmingham UK
| | - Jane Hartley
- Liver Unit Birmingham Children’s Hospital Birmingham UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pande R, Halle-Smith JM, Thorne T, Hiddema L, Hodson J, Roberts KJ, Arshad A, Connor S, Conlon KCP, Dickson EJ, Giovinazzo F, Harrison E, de Liguori Carino N, Hore T, Knight SR, Loveday B, Magill L, Mirza D, Pandanaboyana S, Perry RJ, Pinkney T, Siriwardena AK, Satoi S, Skipworth J, Stättner S, Sutcliffe RP, Tingstedt B. Can trainees safely perform pancreatoenteric anastomosis? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and risk-adjusted analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Surgery 2022; 172:319-328. [PMID: 35221107 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complexity of pancreaticoduodenectomy and fear of morbidity, particularly postoperative pancreatic fistula, can be a barrier to surgical trainees gaining operative experience. This meta-analysis sought to compare the postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatoenteric anastomosis by trainees or established surgeons. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, with differences in postoperative pancreatic fistula rates after pancreatoenteric anastomosis between trainee-led versus consultant/attending surgeons pooled using meta-analysis. Variation in rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula was further explored using risk-adjusted outcomes using published risk scores and cumulative sum control chart analysis in a retrospective cohort. RESULTS Across 14 cohorts included in the meta-analysis, trainees tended toward a lower but nonsignificant rate of all postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio: 0.77, P = .45) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio: 0.69, P = .37). However, there was evidence of case selection, with trainees being less likely to operate on patients with a pancreatic duct width <3 mm (odds ratio: 0.45, P = .05). Similarly, analysis of a retrospective cohort (N = 756 cases) found patients operated by trainees to have significantly lower predicted all postoperative pancreatic fistula (median: 20 vs 26%, P < .001) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (7 vs 9%, P = .020) rates than consultant/attending surgeons, based on preoperative risk scores. After adjusting for this on multivariable analysis, the risks of all postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio: 1.18, P = .604) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio: 0.85, P = .693) remained similar after pancreatoenteric anastomosis by trainees or consultant/attending surgeons. CONCLUSION Pancreatoenteric anastomosis, when performed by trainees, is associated with acceptable outcomes. There is evidence of case selection among patients undergoing surgery by trainees; hence, risk adjustment provides a critical tool for the objective evaluation of performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rupaly Pande
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
| | - James M Halle-Smith
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Thomas Thorne
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lydia Hiddema
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - James Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Ali Arshad
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Southampton, New Zealand
| | - Saxon Connor
- Department of General Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand
| | - Kevin C P Conlon
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Ireland
| | - Euan J Dickson
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Scotland, UK
| | - Francesco Giovinazzo
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy. https://www.twitter.com/FranGiovinazzo
| | - Ewen Harrison
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK. https://www.twitter.com/ewenharrison
| | - Nicola de Liguori Carino
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Manchester University NHS FT, UK. https://www.twitter.com/deLiguoriCarino
| | - Todd Hore
- Department of General Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand
| | - Stephen R Knight
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Benjamin Loveday
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia. https://www.twitter.com/BenPTLoveday
| | - Laura Magill
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. https://www.twitter.com/DrDariusMirza
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. https://www.twitter.com/Sanjay_HPB
| | - Rita J Perry
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Thomas Pinkney
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium, University of Birmingham, UK. https://www.twitter.com/pinkney_t
| | | | - Sohei Satoi
- Division of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan; Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - James Skipworth
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Salzkammergut Klinikum OÖG, Sweden. https://www.twitter.com/SStattner
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. https://www.twitter.com/liveRPancSurg
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Lund University, Sweden. https://www.twitter.com/conlonhpb
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Singh H, Kelgeri C, Passingham C, Johansen L, van Mourik I, Ong E, Perera MTPR, Mirza D, Sharif K, Hartley J, Gupte G. Response to Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: why children are not small adults. Acta Paediatr 2022; 111:1825-1826. [PMID: 35771191 DOI: 10.1111/apa.16471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Harveen Singh
- Clinical Liver Fellow, Liver Unit, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chayarani Kelgeri
- Paediatric Hepatologist, Liver Unit, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Charlotte Passingham
- Research Co-ordinator, Liver Unit, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lauren Johansen
- Paediatric Hepatologist, Liver Unit, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Indra van Mourik
- Paediatric Hepatologist, Liver Unit, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Evelyn Ong
- Paediatric Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgeon, Liver Unit, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Thamara P R Perera
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgeon, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Liver Unit, Women's Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgeon, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Liver Unit, Women's Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Khalid Sharif
- Paediatric Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgeon, Liver Unit, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jane Hartley
- Paediatric Hepatologist, Liver Unit, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Girish Gupte
- Paediatric Hepatologist, Liver Unit, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bridgewater J, Fletcher P, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Prasad R, Mirza D, Anthony A, Corrie P, Falk S, Finch-Jones M, Wasan H, Ross P, Wall L, Wadsley J, Evans TR, Stocken D, Stubbs C, Praseedom R, Ma YT, Davidson B, Neoptolemos J, Iveson T, Cunningham D, Garden OJ, Valle JW, Primrose J. Long-Term Outcomes and Exploratory Analyses of the Randomized Phase III BILCAP Study. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2048-2057. [PMID: 35316080 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The BILCAP study described a modest benefit for capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for curatively resected biliary tract cancer (BTC), and capecitabine has become the standard of care. We present the long-term data and novel exploratory subgroup analyses. METHODS This randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase III study recruited patients age 18 years or older with histologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma or muscle-invasive gallbladder cancer after resection with curative intent and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of < 2. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral capecitabine (1,250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle, for eight cycles) or observation. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). This study is registered with EudraCT 2005-003318-13. RESULTS Between March 15, 2006, and December 4, 2014, 447 patients were enrolled; 223 patients with BTC resected with curative intent were randomly assigned to the capecitabine group and 224 to the observation group. At the data cutoff of January 21, 2021, the median follow-up for all patients was 106 months (95% CI, 98 to 108). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the median OS was 49.6 months (95% CI, 35.1 to 59.1) in the capecitabine group compared with 36.1 months (95% CI, 29.7 to 44.2) in the observation group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.06). In a protocol-specified sensitivity analysis, adjusting for minimization factors, nodal status, grade, and sex, the OS hazard ratio was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.94). We further describe the prognostic impact of R status, grade, nodal status, and sex. CONCLUSION This long-term analysis supports the previous analysis, suggesting that capecitabine can improve OS in patients with resected BTC when used as adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery and should be considered as the standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel H Palmer
- Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - Raj Prasad
- Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- Birmingham Woman's and Children's NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Anthony
- Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Pippa Corrie
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Falk
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Meg Finch-Jones
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Harpreet Wasan
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Ross
- Guys and St Thomas's NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Wall
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Deborah Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Clive Stubbs
- Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Raaj Praseedom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yuk Ting Ma
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Tim Iveson
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Juan W Valle
- University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - John Primrose
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gómez-Gavara C, Lim C, Adam R, Zieniewicz K, Karam V, Mirza D, Heneghan M, Pirenne J, Cherqui D, Oniscu G, Watson C, Schneeberger S, Boudjema K, Fondevila C, Pratschke J, Salloum C, Esposito F, Esono D, Lahat E, Feray C, Azoulay D. The impact of advanced patient age in liver transplantation: a European Liver Transplant Registry propensity-score matching study. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:974-985. [PMID: 34872865 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The futility of liver transplantation in elderly recipients remains under debate in the HCV eradication era. METHODS The aim was to assess the effect of older age on outcome after liver transplantation. We used the ELTR to study the relationship between recipient age and post-transplant outcome. Young and elderly recipients were compared using a PSM method. RESULTS A total of 10,172 cases were analysed. Recipient age >65 years was identified as an independent risk factor associated with reduced patient survival (HR:1.42 95%CI:1.23-1.65,p < 0.001). After PSM, 2124 patients were matched, and the same association was found between elderly recipients and patient survival and graft survival (p < 0.001). As hepatocellular carcinoma and alcoholic cirrhosis were independent prognostic factors for patient and graft survival a propensity score-matching was performed for each. Patient and graft survival were significantly worse (p < 0.05) in the alcoholic cirrhosis elderly group. However, patient and graft survival in the hepatocellular carcinoma cohort were similar (p > 0.05) between groups. CONCLUSION Liver transplantation is an acceptable and safe curative option for elderly transplant candidates, with worse long-term outcomes compare to young candidates. The underlying liver disease for liver transplantation has a significant impact on the selection of elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Concepción Gómez-Gavara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vall D´Hebrón Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - René Adam
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Krzysztof Zieniewicz
- Department of General and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha, Poland
| | - Vincent Karam
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Darius Mirza
- HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | | | - Jacques Pirenne
- Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Transplantation Research Group, KU, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Gabriel Oniscu
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Watson
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke´s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, 2 Rue Henri le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General & Digestive Surgery, Institut Clínic de Malalties Digestives I Metabòliques, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Mitte/Campus Virchow, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chady Salloum
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Francesco Esposito
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Grand Hôpital de L'Est Francilien, Meaux, France
| | - Daniel Esono
- Department of Information and Communications Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eylon Lahat
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Cyrille Feray
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Azoulay
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Israel; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pande R, Chughtai S, Ahuja M, Brown R, Bartlett DC, Dasari BV, Marudanayagam R, Mirza D, Roberts K, Isaac J, Sutcliffe RP, Chatzizacharias NA. Para-aortic lymph node involvement should not be a contraindication to resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:429-441. [PMID: 35734625 PMCID: PMC9160687 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i5.429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) are found in the aortocaval groove and they are staged as metastatic disease if involved by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The data in the literature is conflicting with some studies having associated PALN involvement with poor prognosis, while others not sharing the same results. PALN resection is not included in the standard lymphadenectomy during pancreatic resections as per the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery and there is no consensus on the management of these cases.
AIM To investigate the prognostic significance of PALN metastases on the oncological outcomes after resection for PDAC.
METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of data retrieved from a prospectively maintained database on consecutive patients undergoing pancreatectomies for PDAC where PALN was sampled between 2011 and 2020. Statistical comparison of the data between PALN+ and PALN- subgroups, survival analysis with the Kaplan-Meier method and risk analysis with univariable and multivariable time to event Cox regression analysis were performed, specifically assessing oncological outcomes such as median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).
RESULTS 81 cases had PALN sampling and 17 (21%) were positive. Pathological N stage was significantly different between PALN+ and PALN- patients (P = 0.005), while no difference was observed in any of the other characteristics. Preoperative imaging diagnosed PALN positivity in one case. OS and DFS were comparable between PALN+ and PALN- patients with lymph node positive disease (OS: 13.2 mo vs 18.8 mo, P = 0.161; DFS: 13 mo vs 16.4 mo, P = 0.179). No difference in OS or DFS was identified between PALN positive and negative patients when they received chemotherapy either in the neoadjuvant or in the adjuvant setting (OS: 23.4 mo vs 20.6 mo, P = 0.192; DFS: 23.9 mo vs 20.5 mo, P = 0.718). On the contrary, when patients did not receive chemotherapy, PALN disease had substantially shorter OS (5.5 mo vs 14.2 mo; P = 0.015) and DFS (4.4 mo vs 9.8 mo; P < 0.001). PALN involvement was not identified as an independent predictor for OS after multivariable analysis, while it was for DFS doubling the risk of recurrence.
CONCLUSION PALN involvement does not affect OS when patients complete the indicated treatment pathway for PDAC, surgery and chemotherapy, and should not be considered as a contraindication to resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupaly Pande
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Shafiq Chughtai
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Manish Ahuja
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Brown
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - David C Bartlett
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby V Dasari
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolaos A Chatzizacharias
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nutu A, Wilson M, Ross E, Joshi K, Sutcliffe R, Roberts K, Marudanayagam R, Muiesan P, Chatzizacharias N, Mirza D, Isaac J, Dasari BVM. Influence of middle hepatic vein resection during right or left hepatectomy on post hepatectomy outcomes. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2022; 26:257-262. [PMID: 35599354 PMCID: PMC9428431 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.21-159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Middle hepatic vein (MHV) is usually preserved as a part of the right or left hepatectomy in order preserve the venous outflow of remnant liver. The aim of this study was to evaluate if resection of MHV could influence post-resection outcomes of standard right or left hepatectomy. Methods Patients who underwent standard right or left hepatectomy between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. Anatomical remnant liver volumes were measured retrospectively using the Hermes workstation (Hermes Medical Solutions AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Uni- and multi-variate analyses were performed to assess the difference in outcomes of those with preservation of MHV and those without preservation. Results A total of 144 patients were included. Right hepatectomy was performed for 114 (79.2%) and left hepatectomy was performed for 30 (20.8%) patients. MHV was resected for 13 (9.0%) in addition to the standard right or left hepatectomy. Median remnant liver volume was significantly higher in the MHV resected group (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in serum level of bilirubin, international normalized ratio, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine on postoperative day 1, 3, 5, or 10, ≥ grade IIIa complications (p = 0.44), or 90-day mortality (p = 0.41). On multivariable analysis, resection of the MHV did not influence the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure (p = 0.52). Conclusions Resection of the MHV at standard right or left hepatectomy did not have a negative impact on postoperative outcomes of patients with adequate remnant liver volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisa Nutu
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Michael Wilson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Erin Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kunal Joshi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith Roberts
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bobby V. M. Dasari
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Alarabiyat M, Raza SS, Isaac J, Mirza D, Marudanayagam R, Roberts K, Abradelo M, Bartlett DC, Dasari BV, Sutcliffe RP, Chatzizacharias NA. Incidental gallbladder cancer diagnosis confers survival advantage irrespective of tumour stage and characteristics. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:1996-2007. [PMID: 35664962 PMCID: PMC9150056 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i18.1996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) represents 50%-60% of gallbladder cancer cases. Data are conflicting on the role of IGBC diagnosis in oncological outcomes. Some studies suggest that IGBC diagnosis does not affect outcomes, while others that overall survival (OS) is longer in these cases compared to non-incidental diagnosis (NIGBC). Furthermore, some studies reported early tumour stages and histopathologic characteristics as possible confounders, while others not.
AIM To investigate the role of IGBC diagnosis on patients’ overall survival, especially after surgical treatment with curative intent.
METHODS Retrospective analysis of all patient referrals with gallbladder cancer between 2008 and 2020 in a tertiary hepatobiliary centre. Statistical comparison of patient and tumour characteristics between IGBC and NIGBC subgroups was performed. Survival analysis for the whole cohort, surgical and non-surgical subgroups was done with the Kaplan-Meier method and the use of log rank test. Risk analysis was performed with univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS The cohort included 261 patients with gallbladder cancer. 65% of cases had NIGBC and 35% had IGBC. A total of 90 patients received surgical treatment (66% of IGBC cases and 19% of NIGBC cases). NIGBC patients had more advanced T stage and required more extensive resections than IGBC ones. OS was longer in patients with IGBC in the whole cohort (29 vs 4 mo, P < 0.001), as well as in the non-surgical (14 vs 2 mo, P < 0.001) and surgical subgroups (29 vs 16.5 mo, P = 0.001). Disease free survival (DFS) after surgery was longer in patients with IGBC (21.5 mo vs 8.5 mo, P = 0.007). N stage and resection margin status were identified as independent predictors of OS and DFS. NIGBC diagnosis was identified as an independent predictor of OS.
CONCLUSION IGBC diagnosis may confer a survival advantage independently of the pathological stage and tumour characteristics. Prospective studies are required to further investigate this, including detailed pathological analysis and molecular gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moath Alarabiyat
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Syed Soulat Raza
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Manuel Abradelo
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - David C Bartlett
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby V Dasari
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolaos A Chatzizacharias
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Singh H, Selvarajan L, Ong SY, Ali S, Sharif K, Mirza D, Gupte G. Late Bleeding Episodes Following Intestinal Transplantation: It Is Not Always Rejection or Infection. JPGN Rep 2022; 3:e174. [PMID: 37168923 PMCID: PMC10158307 DOI: 10.1097/pg9.0000000000000174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Ectopic varices have been reported in 5% of children presenting with variceal bleeding and are defined as portosystemic venous collaterals occurring anywhere in the abdomen except in the cardioesophageal region. The liver-intestinal transplant or isolated liver-intestinal transplant patient presenting several years post-transplant with ectopic variceal bleeding as a consequence of portal hypertension is a seldom reported complication. Etiologies such as rejection or infection are a more common source of bleeding, and only after excluding these can differentials such as portal hypertension secondary to a blocked portacaval shunt or native liver disease be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harveen Singh
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lakshmi Selvarajan
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sik-Yong Ong
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sajeed Ali
- University of Cambridge School of Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Khalid Sharif
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Girish Gupte
- From the Liver Unit, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Seth AK, Mohanka R, Navin S, Gokhale AGK, Sharma A, Kumar A, Ramachandran B, Balakrishnan KR, Mirza D, Mehta D, Zirpe KG, Dhital K, Sahay M, Simha S, Sundaram R, Pandit R, Mani RK, Gursahani R, Gupta S, Kute VB, Shroff S. Organ Donation after Circulatory Determination of Death in India: A Joint Position Paper. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022; 26:421-438. [PMID: 35656056 PMCID: PMC9067489 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Avnish K Seth
- Manipal Organ Sharing and Transplant (MOST), Manipal Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ravi Mohanka
- Department of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Reliance Foundation Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Ravi Mohanka, Department of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Reliance Foundation Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, Phone: +91 7506668666, e-mail:
| | | | | | - Ashish Sharma
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Anil Kumar
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India
| | - Bala Ramachandran
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Darius Mirza
- University of Birmingham, United Kingdom and Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Kapil G Zirpe
- Department of Neuro Trauma Unit, Grant Medical Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kumud Dhital
- Department of Heart and Lung Transplantation, SS Sparsh Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Manisha Sahay
- Osmania Medical College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Srinagesh Simha
- Department of Palliative Care, Karunashraya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | | | | | - Raj K Mani
- Department of Critical Care and Pulmonology, Yashoda Super Specialty Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Roop Gursahani
- Department of Neurology, PD Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Subash Gupta
- Max Centre for Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Vivek B Kute
- Department of Nephrology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center, Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Sunil Shroff
- Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pande R, Halle-Smith JM, Phelan L, Thorne T, Panikkar M, Hodson J, Roberts KJ, Arshad A, Connor S, Conlon KC, Dickson EJ, Giovinazzo F, Harrison E, de Liguori Carino N, Hore T, Knight SR, Loveday B, Magill L, Mirza D, Pandanaboyana S, Perry RJ, Pinkney T, Siriwardena AK, Satoi S, Skipworth J, Stättner S, Sutcliffe RP, Tingstedt B. External validation of postoperative pancreatic fistula prediction scores in pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:287-298. [PMID: 34810093 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple risk scores claim to predict the probability of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy. It is unclear which scores have undergone external validation and are the most accurate. The aim of this study was to identify risk scores for POPF, and assess the clinical validity of these scores. METHODS Areas under receiving operator characteristic curve (AUROCs) were extracted from studies that performed external validation of POPF risk scores. These were pooled for each risk score, using intercept-only random-effects meta-regression models. RESULTS Systematic review identified 34 risk scores, of which six had been subjected to external validation, and so included in the meta-analysis, (Tokyo (N=2 validation studies), Birmingham (N=5), FRS (N=19), a-FRS (N=12), m-FRS (N=3) and ua-FRS (N=3) scores). Overall predictive accuracies were similar for all six scores, with pooled AUROCs of 0.61, 0.70, 0.71, 0.70, 0.70 and 0.72, respectively. Considerably heterogeneity was observed, with I2 statistics ranging from 52.1-88.6%. CONCLUSION Most risk scores lack external validation; where this was performed, risk scores were found to have limited predictive accuracy. . Consensus is needed for which score to use in clinical practice. Due to the limited predictive accuracy, future studies to derive a more accurate risk score are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rupaly Pande
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
| | - James M Halle-Smith
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Liam Phelan
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Thomas Thorne
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Panikkar
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - James Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Ali Arshad
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Southampton, Tremona Rd, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Saxon Connor
- Department of General Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand
| | - Kevin Cp Conlon
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, The University of Dublin, Trinity College, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Euan J Dickson
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Scotland, UK
| | - Francesco Giovinazzo
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Ewen Harrison
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Nicola de Liguori Carino
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Manchester University NHS FT, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Todd Hore
- Department of General Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand
| | - Stephen R Knight
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Benjamin Loveday
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Laura Magill
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium (BiSTC), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TW, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Rita J Perry
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium (BiSTC), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TW, UK
| | - Thomas Pinkney
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium (BiSTC), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TW, UK
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Manchester University NHS FT, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Sohei Satoi
- Division of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan; Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical,Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - James Skipworth
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Salzkammergut Klinikum OÖG, Sweden
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Lund University, Box 117, 221 00, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
de Ville de Goyet J, Baumann U, Karam V, Adam R, Nadalin S, Heaton N, Reding R, Branchereau S, Mirza D, Klempnauer JL, Fischer L, Kalicinski P, Colledan M, Lopez Santamaria M, de Kleine RH, Chardot C, Yilmaz S, Kilic M, Boillot O, di Francesco F, Polak WG, Verkade HJ. European Liver Transplant Registry: Donor and transplant surgery aspects of 16,641 liver transplantations in children. Hepatology 2022; 75:634-645. [PMID: 34724224 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) has collected data on liver transplant procedures performed in Europe since 1968. APPROACH AND RESULTS Over a 50-year period (1968-2017), clinical and laboratory data were collected from 133 transplant centers and analyzed retrospectively (16,641 liver transplants in 14,515 children). Data were analyzed according to three successive periods (A, before 2000; B, 2000-2009; and C, since 2010), studying donor and graft characteristics and graft outcome. The use of living donors steadily increased from A to C (A, n = 296 [7%]; B, n = 1131 [23%]; and C, n = 1985 [39%]; p = 0.0001). Overall, the 5-year graft survival rate has improved from 65% in group A to 75% in group B (p < 0.0001) and to 79% in group C (B versus C, p < 0.0001). Graft half-life was 31 years, overall; it was 41 years for children who survived the first year after transplant. The late annual graft loss rate in teenagers is higher than that in children aged <12 years and similar to that of young adults. No evidence for accelerated graft loss after age 18 years was found. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric liver transplantation has reached a high efficacy as a cure or treatment for severe liver disease in infants and children. Grafts that survived the first year had a half-life similar to standard human half-life. Transplantation before or after puberty may be the pivot-point for lower long-term outcome in children. Further studies are necessary to revisit some old concepts regarding transplant benefit (survival time) for small children, the role of recipient pathophysiology versus graft aging, and risk at transition to adult age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean de Ville de Goyet
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Pediatric Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ulrich Baumann
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Paediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association, Padua, Italy
| | - Vincent Karam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm U 935, Villejuif, France
| | - René Adam
- European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association, Padua, Italy.,European Liver Transplant Registry, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm U 935, Villejuif, France
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Raymond Reding
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sophie Branchereau
- Service de Chirurgie Viscérale Pédiatrique Bicêtre University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Paris-Sud, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Darius Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jürgen L Klempnauer
- Klinik für Viszeral und Transplantations-chirurgie, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Visceral Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Piotr Kalicinski
- Department of Pediatric and Transplant Surgery, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michele Colledan
- Università degli studi di Milano Bicocca, ASST Giovanni XXIII, Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Ruben H de Kleine
- Department of Surgery, Section of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Christophe Chardot
- Service de Chirurgie Pediatrique, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | - Sezai Yilmaz
- Liver Transplantation Institute, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Murat Kilic
- Liver Transplant Program, Izmir Kent Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Olivier Boillot
- Pediatric Liver Transplant Surgery, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Fabrizio di Francesco
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Pediatric Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Palermo, Italy
| | - Wojciech G Polak
- European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association, Padua, Italy.,Erasmus MC, Transplant Institute, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henkjan J Verkade
- European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association, Padua, Italy.,Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | -
- European Liver Transplant Registry, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm U 935, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Heinemann M, Liwinski T, Adam R, Berenguer M, Mirza D, Malek-Hosseini SA, Heneghan MA, Lodge P, Pratschke J, Boudjema K, Paul A, Zieniewicz K, Fronek J, Mehrabi A, Acarli K, Tokat Y, Coker A, Yilmaz S, Karam V, Duvoux C, Lohse AW, Schramm C. Long-term outcome after living donor liver transplantation compared to donation after brain death in autoimmune liver diseases: Experience from the European Liver Transplant Registry. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:626-633. [PMID: 34605157 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Knowledge of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) is scarce. This study analyzed survival in LDLT recipients registered in the European Liver Transplant Registry with autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and the non-autoimmune disorder alcohol-related cirrhosis. In total, 29 902 individuals enrolled between 1998 and 2017 were analyzed, including 1003 with LDLT. Survival from >90 days after LDLT for AILDs in adults was 85.5%, 74.2%, and 58.0% after 5, 10, and 15 years. Adjusted for recipient age, sex, and liver transplantation era, adult PSC patients receiving LDLT showed increased mortality compared to donation after brain death (DBD) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36-2.80, p < .001). Pediatric PSC patients showed also increased mortality >90 days after LDLT compared to DBD (HR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.04-8.70, p = .043). Multivariate analysis identified several risk factors for death in adult PSC patients receiving LDLT including a male donor (HR = 2.49, p = .025). Adult PSC patients with LDLT versus DBD conferred increased mortality from disease recurrence (subdistribution hazard ratio [subHR] = 5.36, p = .001) and biliary complications (subHR = 4.40, p = .006) in multivariate analysis. While long-term outcome following LDLT for AILD is generally favorable, PSC patients with LDLT compared to DBD might be at increased risk of death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Heinemann
- I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timur Liwinski
- I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,European Reference Network for Hepatological Diseases, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rene Adam
- Hepato-Biliary Center, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, University of Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Seyed Ali Malek-Hosseini
- Avicenna Center for Medicine and Organ Transplant, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Michael A Heneghan
- King's Liver Transplant Unit, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Lodge
- The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Andreas Paul
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Krzysztof Zieniewicz
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jiri Fronek
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Koray Acarli
- Organ Transplantation Center, Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yaman Tokat
- Liver Transplantation Center, Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Coker
- Department of General Surgery, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Sezai Yilmaz
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Vincent Karam
- Hepato-Biliary Center, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, University of Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Christophe Duvoux
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Henri-Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - Ansgar W Lohse
- I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,European Reference Network for Hepatological Diseases, Hamburg, Germany.,Martin Zeitz Center for Rare Diseases, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Schramm
- I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,European Reference Network for Hepatological Diseases, Hamburg, Germany.,Martin Zeitz Center for Rare Diseases, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Masson S, Taylor R, Whitney J, Adair A, Attia M, Gibbs P, Grammatikopoulos T, Isaac J, Marshall A, Mirza D, Prachalias A, Watson S, Manas D, Forsythe J, Thorburn D. A coordinated national UK liver transplant program response, prioritising waitlist recipients with the highest need, provided excellent outcomes during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14563. [PMID: 34913525 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Healthcare provision has been severely affected by COVID-19, with specific challenges in organ transplantation. Here, we describe the coordinated response to, and outcomes during the first wave, across all UK liver transplant (LT) centres. Several policy changes affecting the liver transplant processes were agreed upon. These included donor age restrictions and changes to offering. A 'high-urgency' (HU) category was established, prioritising only those with UKELD >60, HCC reaching transplant criteria, and others likely to die within 90 days. Outcomes were compared with the same period in 2018 & 2019. The retrieval rate for deceased donor livers (71% vs 54%; p<0.0001) and conversion from offer to completed transplant (63% vs 48%; p<0.0001) was significantly higher. Paediatric LT activity was maintained; there was a significant reduction in adult (42%) and total (36%) LT. Almost all adult LT were super-urgent (n = 15) or HU (n = 133). We successfully prioritised those with highest illness severity with no reduction in 90-day patient (p = 0.89) or graft survival (p = 0.98). There was a small (5% compared with 3%; p = 0.0015) increase in deaths or removals from the waitlist, mainly amongst HU cohort. We successfully prioritised LT recipients in highest need, maintaining excellent outcomes, and waitlist mortality was only marginally increased. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Masson
- Liver Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NE7 7DN, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Julie Whitney
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Stoke Gifford, Bristol, UK
| | - Anya Adair
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Magdy Attia
- Leeds Transplant Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Gibbs
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Universities Hospital Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tassos Grammatikopoulos
- Paediatric Liver, Gastrointestinal & Nutrition Centre and Mowat Labs, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Aileen Marshall
- Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Liver Unit, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Sarah Watson
- Highly Specialised Services, NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK
| | - Derek Manas
- Liver Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NE7 7DN, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,NHS Blood and Transplant, Stoke Gifford, Bristol, UK
| | - John Forsythe
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Stoke Gifford, Bristol, UK
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Stoke Gifford, Bristol, UK.,Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Raza SS, Nutu A, Powell-Brett S, Boteon AC, Hodson J, Chatzizacharias N, Dasari B, Isaac J, Abradelo M, Marudanayagam R, Mirza D, Roberts K, Sutcliffe R. O-P06 Early postoperative differentiation between biochemical leak and clinically-relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a predictive risk score. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab429.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several risk scores are available which predict pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), but do not differentiate between biochemical leak (BL) and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). The aim of this study was to identify factors that differentiate between BL and CR-POPF in the early postoperative period.
Methods
Consecutive patients diagnosed with BL and CR-POPF after PD were identified from a prospectively maintained database (2009-2019). Data were collected for demographics, intraoperative and laboratory parameters on the first five postoperative days (PODs), including drain fluid amylase (DFA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin. Independent predictors of CR-POPF were identified using a multivariable binary logistic regression model, which was subsequently converted to a risk score
Results
187 patients consisted of 99 BL and 88 CR-POPF. In those with CR-POPF, the leak became clinically relevant a median of 9 days after surgery; these patients had a significantly higher length of hospital stay than those with BL (median: 24 vs. 10 days, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, male gender (p = 0.002), higher DFA (p < 0.001) or CRP (p < 0.001) on POD3, lower albumin (p = 0.028) on POD3 were all found to be independent predictors of CR-POPF. A risk score based on these factors returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.78.
Conclusions
In patients with a confirmed pancreatic fistula it may be possible to differentiate between BL and CR-POPF using early postoperative variables, particularly DFA, serum albumin and CRP. Early identification of CR-POPF may allow earlier intervention to improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anisa Nutu
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - James Hodson
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Bobby Dasari
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Darius Mirza
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Raza SS, Nutu A, Powell-Brett S, Boteon AC, Hodson J, Abradelo M, Dasari B, Isaac J, Chatzizacharias N, Marudanayagam R, Mirza D, Roberts K, Sutcliffe R. P-P34 Impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol on Short-Term Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab430.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In an effort to improve postoperative recovery and reduce complications, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been introduced across a range of surgical disciplines. The demographics of patients being considered for PD have evolved over recent decades, with older patients undergoing increasingly more complex procedures. The feasibility and benefits of an ERAS protocol for elderly patients undergoing PD is debated, a recent study suggesting that age over 70 years is an independent risk factor for protocol failure . Existing studies on ERAS after PD in elderly patients are limited by small sample sizes and failure to include a pre-ERAS control.
Methods
830 consecutive patients who underwent PD between January 2009 and March 2019 were divided according to age: elderly (≥75 years) vs. non-elderly patients (<75 years). Within each age group, cohort characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients treated pre- and post-ERAS (ERAS was systematically introduced in December 2012). Univariable and multivariable analysis were then performed, to assess whether ERAS was independently associated with length of hospital stay (LOS).
Results
Of the entire cohort, 577 of 830 patients (69.5%) were managed according to an ERAS protocol, and 170 patients (20.5%) were aged ≥ 75 years old. Patients treated post-ERAS were significantly more comorbid than those pre-ERAS, with a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4.6 vs. 4.1 (p < 0.001) and 6.0 vs. 5.7 (p = 0.039) for the non-elderly and elderly subgroups, respectively. There were significantly fewer medical complications in non-elderly patients treated post-ERAS compared to pre-ERAS (12.4% vs. 22.4%; p = 0.002), but not in elderly patients (23.6% vs. 14.0%; p = 0.203). On multivariable analysis, ERAS was independently associated with reduced LOS in both elderly (14.8% reduction, 95% CI: 0.7-27.0%, p = 0.041) and non-elderly patients (15.6% reduction, 95%CI: 9.2-21.6%, p < 0.001), with the effect size being similar in each group.
Conclusions
ERAS protocol can be safely applied to patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy irrespective of age. ERAS is associated with a significant reduction in postoperative LOS in elderly and non-elderly patients, despite higher comorbidity in the post-ERAS period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anisa Nutu
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - James Hodson
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Bobby Dasari
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Darius Mirza
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Raza SS, Nutu A, Powell-Brett S, Chatzizacharias N, Dasari B, Isaac J, Abradelo M, Marudanayagam R, Mirza D, Roberts K, Sutcliffe R. P-P35 Textbook outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in high risk patients: results from a high volume UK centre. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab430.257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Textbook Outcome (TO) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a quality metric that may be used to compare outcomes between centres, but the effect of casemix on TO is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if TO after PD is affected by casemix.
Methods
TO was evaluated in a prospectively maintained database of 830 consecutive patients who underwent PD between 2009-2019 in a high volume centre. TO was defined as an absence of POPF, bile leak, haemorrhage, Clavien III+ complications, readmission and hospital mortality. Frequency of TO was compared between high and low risk cases. High risk was defined as any of the following: age ≥ 75 years, significant comorbidity (Charlson index ≥5), vascular resection or additional procedures. Multivariable analysis using binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with TO.
Results
Overall, 599/830 patients (72%) had TO after PD. There has been no change during the study period (2009-2013 v 2014-2018: 70% v 75%; p = 0.148). There was no difference in TO in elderly patients (p = 0.774), severe comorbidity (p = 0.483), vascular resection (p = 0.187) or additional procedures (p = 0.189). On multivariable analysis, cardiac disease (OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.28-0.81; p = 0.006), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (OR 1.55 95%CI 1.02-2.35; p = 0.039) and hard gland (OR 3.12, 95%CI 2.06-4.736; p < 0.001) were independently associated with TO.
Conclusions
Acceptable Textbook Outcomes can be achieved in high risk patients and those undergoing complex surgery, when performed in high volume specialist centres with appropriate patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anisa Nutu
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Bobby Dasari
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Darius Mirza
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Halle-Smith J, Hall L, Mirza D, Roberts K. P-BN46 Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture after Hepaticojejunostomy for Bile Duct Injury – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab430.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
After major bile duct injury (BDI), hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) is usually required. This can lead to good long-term patency but anastomotic stricture unfortunately remains common cause of long-term morbidity after major BDI. Although risk factors for adverse outcomes of BDI repair are reasonably well understood, there is a need to assimilate high level evidence to establish risk factors specifically for development of anastomotic stricture after HJ for BDI.
Methods
This was a systematic review of studies reporting rate of anastomotic stricture after HJ for BDI was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Where possible, meta-analyses were then performed to establish risk factors for anastomotic stricture after HJ for BDI.
Results
The meta-analyses performed included five factors with a total of 2,155 patients from 17 studies. An increased rate of anastomotic stricture after HJ for BDI was shown amongst patients with concomitant vascular injury (OR 4.96; 95%CI 1.92-12.86; p = 0.001), post-repair bile leak (OR: 8.03; 95%CI 2.04-31.71; p = 0.003) and repair by non-specialist surgeon (OR 11.29; 95%CI 5.21-24.47; p < 0.0001). Level of injury according to Strasberg Grade did not significantly affect the rate of anastomotic stricture (OR: 0.97; 95%CI 0.45-2.10; p = 0.93). Due to heterogeneity of reporting it was not possible to perform meta-analysis for impact of timing of repair on anastomotic stricture rate.
Conclusions
Repair by a non-specialist surgeon was the only modifiable risk factor revealed by this meta-analysis and systematic review, which demonstrates the importance of broad awareness of these data. That said, knowledge of these risk factors permits evidence-based risk stratification of follow-up as well as better informed consent and understanding of prognosis for patients who have experienced major BDI and require HJ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Halle-Smith
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lewis Hall
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Halle-Smith J, Hodson J, Coldham C, Dasari B, Chatzizacharias N, Marudanayagam R, Sutcliffe R, Isaac J, Mirza D, Roberts K. P-P49 Predicting Future Pathological and Operative Complexity in Pancreatoduodenectomy: 30 Years of Experience. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab430.271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patient selection for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is largely based upon local experience and established practice. This study sought to observe changes in complexity and patient cohort over time with the aim of predicting future cohort characteristic of patients undergoing PD.
Methods
All PDs at our institution between 1988 and 2020 were reviewed (n = 1,878) to observe changing trends in patient demographic, pathological diagnosis, operative factors and postoperative outcomes. Coefficients from regression models were reported as gradients per decade, to quantify the rate of change over time. The resulting models were then plotted to illustrate the trend across the study period, as well as forecasts for subsequent years.
Results
The annual volume (7 to 128) and proportion of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (28 to 53%) increased at a linear rate. The proportion of associated vein resection (3 to 25%) and technical difficulty (type 2-4; 5 to 28%) increased in a nonlinear way, increasing more rapidly in later times. The average age (48 to 67) increased in a log linear trend. Length of stay reduced by 9.3%, whilst mortality reduced with an odds ratio of 0.69, per decade. Furthermore, When performance at our institution was compared to recently established benchmarks, it was shown that our institution regularly performed within these standards with few exceptions. By 2030 our predictions indicate that the average age will increase to 69, PDAC will comprise 62% of pathology, 40% will have an associated venous resection and 43% will be graded 2-4 in technical difficulty. Length of stay will have reduced to 9.6 days and mortality to 2%.
Conclusions
Despite increasing complexity of surgery and patient age, length of stay and mortality after PD are reducing. Understanding changes over time permits an estimation of a future surgical cohort where complexity will increase. It is important that surgeons continue to push boundaries. Patient selection, based upon prior experience may inhibit progression and development of services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Halle-Smith
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - James Hodson
- Medical Statistics, Institute of Translational Medicine, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Coldham
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby Dasari
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keith Roberts
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Greenhall GHB, Ushiro‐Lumb I, Pavord S, Currie I, Perera MTPR, Hartog H, Hill QA, Mohamed I, Khurram MA, Motallebzadeh R, Jones G, Marshall A, Pollok J, Torpey N, Pettigrew GJ, Mehra S, Sharma H, Calder F, Kessaris N, Nath J, Roy D, Oniscu GC, Clancy M, Santhanakrishnan K, Mascaro J, Lim S, Berman M, Madden S, Mumford L, Mirza D, Watson C, McGowan O, Thorburn D, Ravanan R, Hunt BJ, Callaghan CJ, Roberts DJ, Forsythe J. Organ transplantation from deceased donors with vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:4095-4097. [PMID: 34214257 PMCID: PMC8441635 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc Clancy
- Queen Elizabeth University HospitalGlasgowUK
| | | | | | - Sern Lim
- Queen Elizabeth HospitalBirminghamUK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Janwadkar A, Nagral A, Marar S, Sonavane A, Raut V, Vasanth S, Mirza D. Positional outflow obstruction as a cause of early refractory ascites post-pediatric living donor liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e13969. [PMID: 33502075 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Refractory ascites post-liver transplantation can be a challenging problem. Causes of refractory ascites include venous outflow anastomotic stenosis, vessel kinking by the regenerating liver, pre-existing graft disease, and positional outflow obstruction. We present a case report of a child presenting with high drain output and refractory ascites post-LDLT secondary to a positional kinking. Repeating the Doppler studies with patients both supine and sitting may be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aabha Nagral
- Apollo Hospital, Navi Mumbai, India.,Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Shaji Marar
- Apollo Hospital, Navi Mumbai, India.,Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Nutu OA, Sneiders D, Mirza D, Isaac J, Perera MTPR, Hartog H. Safety of intra-operative blood salvage during liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, a propensity score-matched survival analysis. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2887-2894. [PMID: 34724271 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Intra-operative blood salvage (IBS) reduces the use of allogeneic blood transfusion. However, safety of IBS during liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is questioned due to fear for dissemination of circulating malignant cells. This study aims to assess safety of IBS. HCC patients who underwent LT from January 2006 through December 2019 were included. Patients in whom IBS was used were propensity score matched (1:1) to control patients. Disease-free survival and time to HCC recurrence were assessed with Cox regression models and competing risk models. IBS was used in 192/378 HCC LT recipients, and 127 patients were propensity score matched. Cumulative disease-free survival at 12 and 60 months was 85% and 63% for the IBS group versus 90% and 68% for the no-IBS group. Use of IBS was not associated with impaired disease-free survival (HR 1.07, 95%CI: 0.65-1.76, P = 0.800) nor with increased HCC recurrence (Cause-specific cox model: HR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.36-1.73, P = 0.549, Fine and Gray model: HR: 0.79, 95%CI 0.40-1.57, P = 0.50). In conclusion, IBS during LT did not increase the risk for HCC recurrence. IBS is a safe procedure in HCC LT recipients to reduce the need for allogenic blood transfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dimitri Sneiders
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Darius Mirza
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Isaac
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Hermien Hartog
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Belli LS, Duvoux C, Cortesi PA, Facchetti R, Iacob S, Perricone G, Radenne S, Conti S, Patrono D, Berlakovich G, Hann A, Pasulo L, Castells L, Faitot F, Detry O, Invernizzi F, Magini G, De Simone P, Kounis I, Morelli MC, Díaz Fontenla F, Ericzon BG, Loinaz C, Johnston C, Gheorghe L, Lesurtel M, Romagnoli R, Kollmann D, Perera MTP, Fagiuoli S, Mirza D, Coilly A, Toso C, Zieniewicz K, Elkrief L, Karam V, Adam R, den Hoed C, Merli M, Puoti M, De Carlis L, Oniscu GC, Piano S, Angeli P, Fondevila C, Polak WG. COVID-19 in liver transplant candidates: pretransplant and post-transplant outcomes - an ELITA/ELTR multicentre cohort study. Gut 2021; 70:1914-1924. [PMID: 34281984 PMCID: PMC8300535 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Explore the impact of COVID-19 on patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT) and on their post-LT course. DESIGN Data from consecutive adult LT candidates with COVID-19 were collected across Europe in a dedicated registry and were analysed. RESULTS From 21 February to 20 November 2020, 136 adult cases with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from 33 centres in 11 European countries were collected, with 113 having COVID-19. Thirty-seven (37/113, 32.7%) patients died after a median of 18 (10-30) days, with respiratory failure being the major cause (33/37, 89.2%). The 60-day mortality risk did not significantly change between first (35.3%, 95% CI 23.9% to 50.0%) and second (26.0%, 95% CI 16.2% to 40.2%) waves. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed Laboratory Model for End-stage Liver Disease (Lab-MELD) score of ≥15 (Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score 15-19, HR 5.46, 95% CI 1.81 to 16.50; MELD score≥20, HR 5.24, 95% CI 1.77 to 15.55) and dyspnoea on presentation (HR 3.89, 95% CI 2.02 to 7.51) being the two negative independent factors for mortality. Twenty-six patients underwent an LT after a median time of 78.5 (IQR 44-102) days, and 25 (96%) were alive after a median follow-up of 118 days (IQR 31-170). CONCLUSIONS Increased mortality in LT candidates with COVID-19 (32.7%), reaching 45% in those with decompensated cirrhosis (DC) and Lab-MELD score of ≥15, was observed, with no significant difference between first and second waves of the pandemic. Respiratory failure was the major cause of death. The dismal prognosis of patients with DC supports the adoption of strict preventative measures and the urgent testing of vaccination efficacy in this population. Prior SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infection did not affect early post-transplant survival (96%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saverio Belli
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Angelo Cortesi
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), Universita degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca Scuola di Medicina e Chirurgia, Monza, Italy
| | - Rita Facchetti
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), Universita degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca Scuola di Medicina e Chirurgia, Monza, Italy
| | - Speranta Iacob
- Digestive Diseases and Liver Transplantation Center, Institutul Clinic Fundeni, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Giovanni Perricone
- Epatologia e Gastroenterologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Sylvie Radenne
- Service Hépatologie et Gastro-Entérologie, Hospital Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France
| | - Sara Conti
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
| | - Damiano Patrono
- Liver Transplantation Unit, Ospedale Molinette, Torino, Italy
| | - Gabriela Berlakovich
- Division of Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Angus Hann
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Luisa Pasulo
- Gastroenterology and Transplant Hepatology, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Lluis Castells
- Liver Transplant Unit, HPB Surgery and Transplants, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francois Faitot
- Service de Chirurgie Hepatobiliare and Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - Olivier Detry
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Liege, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Federica Invernizzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Magini
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Paolo De Simone
- Trapiantologia Epatica Universitaria, Ospedale Cisanello, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ilias Kounis
- Centre Hépatobiliaire, Hospital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Maria Cristina Morelli
- Department of Organ Failures and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fernando Díaz Fontenla
- Liver Transplantation Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bo-Göran Ericzon
- Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carmelo Loinaz
- HBP and Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Chris Johnston
- Liver Transplantation Unit, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Liliana Gheorghe
- Digestive Diseases and Liver Transplantation Center, Clinical Institute Fundeni, Bucuresti, Romania
| | - Mickael Lesurtel
- Department of Surgery and Transplanattion, Hospital Croix-Rousse, Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France
| | | | - Dagmar Kollmann
- Division of Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Stefano Fagiuoli
- Department of Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Audrey Coilly
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France
- UMR-S1193, INSERM, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France
| | - Christian Toso
- Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Krzysztof Zieniewicz
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Laure Elkrief
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Hopital Trousseau, Chambray-les-Tours, France
| | - Vincent Karam
- Centre Hépatobiliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Rene Adam
- Centre Hépatobiliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Marco Merli
- Infectious Diseases, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Massimo Puoti
- Infectious Diseases, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Chirurgia Generale e dei Trapianti, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Gabriel C Oniscu
- Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Salvatore Piano
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Angeli
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Wojciech G Polak
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sadiq MSK, Mirza D, Khan S. CASE REPORT: ORAL MANIFESTATIONS OF YOUNG PATIENT SUFFERING FROM BOTH THALASSEMIA MAJOR AND HEPATITIS B. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.03.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
44
|
Sadiq MSK, Mirza D, Khan S. CASE REPORT: REPORTING THE ORO-DENTAL FINDINGS OF ELLIS-VAN CREVELD SYNDROME – A RARE GENETIC DISORDER. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.03.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
45
|
Tavabie OD, Srivastava A, Dillon A, Mirza D, Masson S, Smith PJ. Twitter debate: controversies in liver transplantation. Frontline Gastroenterol 2021; 13:262-265. [PMID: 35493621 PMCID: PMC8996095 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver D Tavabie
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ankur Srivastava
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
| | - Audrey Dillon
- Liver Unit, St James’ University Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Steven Masson
- Liver Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Philip J Smith
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Stonelake S, Ali S, Pinkey B, Ong E, Anbarasan R, McGuirk S, Perera T, Mirza D, Muiesan P, Sharif K. Fifteen-Year Single-Center Experience of Biliary Complications in Liver Trauma Patients: Changes in the Management of Posttraumatic Bile Leak. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2021; 31:245-251. [PMID: 32422676 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Management of posttraumatic bile leak has evolved over time in our unit, from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) stenting to intraperitoneal drainage (IPD) alone as first-line treatment for intraperitoneal bile leak. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective review of liver trauma patients from 2002 to 2017. Demographics, time and mode of diagnosis of bile leak, management, and outcome were analyzed of the box plot. RESULTS In 118 patients, there were 28 traumatic bile leaks. Eighteen were free intraperitoneal and 10 were localized bilomas. The median time of diagnosis was 6 days following injury. The modes of diagnosis were preemptive hepatobiliary scintigraphy (18), computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (7), and laparotomy (3). Free intraperitoneal biliary leak management included 11 IPD alone, 3 IPD plus ERCP, 2 IPD plus transcystic biliary stent (TBS), 1 operative cholangiogram, and 1 no intervention. Median time of IPD duration was 7 days (4-95) in IPD alone versus 14 days (6-40) in IPD + ERCP/TBS (p = 0.3). Median inpatient length of stay was 13 days (8-44) in IPD alone versus 12 days (8-22) in IPD + ERCP/TBS (p = 0.4). CONCLUSION Placement of IPD alone, as first-line treatment, is safe and effective in the management of intraperitoneal bile leaks, avoiding the costs and potential complications of ERCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Stonelake
- Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Paediatric Surgery, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sana Ali
- Radiology Department, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Pinkey
- Radiology Department, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Evelyn Ong
- Birmingham Children's Hospital, The Liver Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ravindar Anbarasan
- Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Paediatric Surgery, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Simon McGuirk
- Radiology Department, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Thamera Perera
- Birmingham Children's Hospital, The Liver Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- Birmingham Children's Hospital, The Liver Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Birmingham Children's Hospital, The Liver Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Khalid Sharif
- Birmingham Children's Hospital, The Liver Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sonavane A, Raut V, Marar S, Sawant A, Shah K, Raj A, Thorat A, Chaksota H, Bagde A, Verma R, Dharmapalan D, Vasanth S, Nagral A, Mirza D, Yewale V. Preoperative successful thrombectomy and thrombolysis of acute extensive splanchnic venous system and TIPSS thrombosis in a child with Budd-Chiari syndrome-Creating a window to enable living donor liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e13857. [PMID: 33232561 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Preoperative extensive PV thrombosis can pose a technical challenge during liver transplantation surgery. Several strategies adopted to mitigate this problem include creation of a superior mesenteric vein-PV jump graft, use of a polytetrafluoroethylene graft, renoportal anastomosis, or cavoportal hemitransposition. Extensive and diffuse thrombosis of the splanchnic venous system may even necessitate multivisceral transplantation. We describe the case of a pediatric patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome and decompensated cirrhosis, who developed extensive thrombosis of the porto-spleno-mesenteric venous system prior to liver transplantation. We used a combination technique of thrombus aspiration by a novel trans-TIPPS approach followed by thrombolysis. Complete preoperative resolution of the extensive thrombosis was achieved. This allowed the creation of a brief window to enable planned LDLT. In prudently selected patients, performing an early mechanical and chemical thrombolysis of an extensive acute splanchnic venous thrombosis can thus help expedite a planned LDLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amey Sonavane
- Department of Hepatology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Vikram Raut
- Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Shaji Marar
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Ambreen Sawant
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Ketul Shah
- Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Amruth Raj
- Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Ashok Thorat
- Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Harshit Chaksota
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Abhijit Bagde
- Department of Paediatrics, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Rahul Verma
- Department of Paediatrics, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | | | - Suresh Vasanth
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Aabha Nagral
- Department of Hepatology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Vijay Yewale
- Department of Paediatrics, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India.,Head, Institute of Child Health, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Raut V, Sonavane A, Shah K, Raj C A, Thorat A, Sawant A, Chaksota H, Mandot A, Vasanth S, Nagral A, Mirza D. Successful liver transplantation immediately after recovery from COVID-19 in a highly endemic area. Transpl Int 2021; 34:376-377. [PMID: 33253449 PMCID: PMC7753267 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram Raut
- Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Amey Sonavane
- Department of Hepatology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Ketul Shah
- Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Amruth Raj C
- Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Ashok Thorat
- Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Ambreen Sawant
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Harshit Chaksota
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Ameet Mandot
- Department of Hepatology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Suresh Vasanth
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Aabha Nagral
- Department of Hepatology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ruth N, Sharif K, Legarda M, Smith M, Lewis P, Lloyd C, Mirza D, Kelly D. What is the long-term outlook for young people following liver transplant? A single-centre retrospective analysis of physical and psychosocial outcomes. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13782. [PMID: 32678500 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
LT is a successful treatment for end-stage liver disease. The long-term outcome of patients transplanted in childhood has not previously been widely reported. This project assessed the long-term impact of transplantation in patients surviving >15 years. Retrospective data on growth, end-organ damage and psychosocial development were collected in young people transplanted from 1985 to 2000 in a single centre. Clinical notes were reviewed, and patients interviewed at clinic follow-up. 224 patients were transplanted between 1985 and 2000. 143 recipients (63.8%) survived >15 years with a median survival of 19.52 years. The majority were well, and only 10% had abnormal graft function (biochemical/synthetic), the main cause of which was chronic hepatitis (6%). Renal dysfunction and the necessity for renal transplant were identified in 32.8%, of whom 16.7% of patients had a cGFR <70 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 6% of patients had either undergone or awaiting renal transplant. This cohort was healthier than the average age-matched UK population in terms of body mass index (9% obese), smoking and alcohol consumption. 92% of patients had completed or were in education (93/123 had completed education and 20/123 remained in school). 63.7% of patients had been transitioned into adult services, and 46.3% of these patients were employed. 67.5% were in a relationship, one patient was divorced, and 10.6% of patients had one or more children. 11 patients had symptoms that corresponded to a DSM IV diagnosis of depression. Four patients had anorexia nervosa. Developmental delay was identified in 9 out of 99 patients. The development of malignancy, including PTLD, occurred in 10/143 (7%) patients at a median time post-transplant of 2.76 years (range 0.76-9.06 years). Epstein-Barr infection was implicated in 75% of these malignancies. We conclude the long-term outcome of LT in childhood is good with 63.8% surviving into adulthood and over 60% transferring into adult services. Graft dysfunction and end organ damage are minimal. Our cohort is healthier than the general population, and the majority have completed education, sought employment and formed relationships with peers, contributing well to society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Ruth
- The Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's & Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Khalid Sharif
- The Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's & Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Maria Legarda
- The Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's & Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Gastroenterologica, Hepatologica y Nutricion pediatricas, Hospital Universitano Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Monica Smith
- The Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's & Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Philipa Lewis
- The Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's & Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Carla Lloyd
- The Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's & Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- The Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's & Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Deirdre Kelly
- The Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's & Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Parente A, Osei-Bordom DC, Ronca V, Perera MTPR, Mirza D. Organ Restoration With Normothermic Machine Perfusion and Immune Reaction. Front Immunol 2020; 11:565616. [PMID: 33193335 PMCID: PMC7641637 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.565616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation is the only recognized effective treatment for end-stage liver disease. However, organ shortages have become the main challenge for patients and physicians within the transplant community. Waiting list mortality remains an issue with around 10% of patients dying whilst waiting for an available organ. The post-transplantation period is also associated with an adverse complication rate for these specific cohorts of high-risk patients, particularly regarding patient and graft survival. Ischaemia reperfusion injury (IRI) has been highlighted as the mechanism of injury that increases parenchymal damage, which eventually lead to significant graft dysfunction and other poor outcome indicators. The consequences of IRI in clinical practice such as reperfusion syndrome, primary non-function of graft, allograft dysfunction, ischaemic biliary damage and early biliary complications can be life-threatening. IRI dictates the development of a significant inflammatory response that drives the pathway to eventual cell death. The main mechanisms of IRI are mitochondrial damage due to low oxygen tension within the hepatic micro-environment and severe adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion during the ischaemic period. After the restoration of normal blood flow, this damage is further enhanced by reoxygenation as the mitochondria respond to reperfusion by releasing reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn activate Kupffer cells within the hepatic micro-environment, leading to a pro-inflammatory response and eventual parenchymal cell apoptosis and associated tissue degradation. Machine perfusion (MP) is one emergent strategy considered to be one of the most important advances in organ preservation, restoration and transplantation. Indeed, MP has the potential to rescue frequently discarded organs and has been shown to limit the extent of IRI, leading to suppression of the deleterious pro-inflammatory response. This immunomodulation reduces the prevalence of allograft rejection, the use of immunosuppression therapy and minimizes post-transplant complications. This review aims to update the current knowledge of MP with a focus on normothermic machine liver perfusion (NMLP) and its potential role in immune response pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Parente
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel-Clement Osei-Bordom
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Vincenzo Ronca
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Division of Gastroenterology and Centre for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - M Thamara P R Perera
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|