Euthanasia and assisted suicide: An in-depth review of relevant historical aspects

The Moral Dilemma of Euthanasia Through the Eyes of the Medical Society in Bulgaria

INTRODUCTION

With the development of human society, the question of the value and inviolability of human life begins to occupy a central place in the various social strata and social structures. With the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights after the Second World War, the basic postulates protecting the right to inviolability of human life were laid. The question focused on euthanasia has been discussed in several European countries, such as Germany, Ireland, France, and Italy, leading to considerable interest in the medical community in Bulgaria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was performed using approved sample cards, analyzing the general knowledge of the medical community in the Republic of Bulgaria about euthanasia and assisted suicide over a period of four months, between January 2023 and May 2023. In this process, 623 people were surveyed, and the questionnaire included several targeted questions through electronically generated samples on the Microsoft Forms platform. The target group had doctors with and without a specialty in various fields of hospital and pre-hospital care, dentists, and students from the fields of medicine and dentistry.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results show that the majority of medical professionals clearly state their positive opinion on the adoption of a law to legalize euthanasia in the Republic of Bulgaria, clearly taking into account the fact that the right to life has always been and always will be the most absolute and fundamental human right. Contrary to the above, it is implied that it is inevitably linked to a quality and fulfilling life without suffering. Identically, they also answered that a person should have the right to know exactly when to end his own life. The medical society in Bulgaria clearly shows its positive opinion regarding the idea that the different forms of euthanasia (active euthanasia and assisted suicide) should be defined as morally and legally permissible. Our research confirms the Bulgarian medical community's opinion that the subject of the problems of euthanasia and its legal regulation are already ripe for public discussion, similar to many other European countries.

CONCLUSION

The actual issue of euthanasia as a conclusion raises several questions related to the process of acceptance of standard algorithms for action in such cases where the same action is legalized by law. It also includes the process of acceptance of strict regulations by the countries for the so-called negative phenomenon "death tourism" and several other administrative actions related to the mandatory registration of every case of euthanasia, the implementation of mandatory consultations with a psychiatrist and psychologist for patients seeking euthanasia as the only possible option, and providing possible alternatives regarding their illness. This is the unchangeable cornerstone for standardizing the legalization process and acceptance of "good death" in Bulgaria. In its essence, euthanasia creates both a social and an ethical conflict in our modern society, appearing at the same time as a kind of "stress test" for the health system.

The impact of openness to experience personality trait on attitudes of medical students toward euthanasia: the moderating role of spiritual intelligence

Euthanasia is the most important ethical challenges in the entire field of medicine. Various factors may influence the medical students' attitudes toward euthanasia, including personal beliefs, values, and personality traits. This research aimed at examining spiritual intelligence as a moderator of the relationship between openness to experience and attitude toward euthanasia. In this cross-sectional study, a total of 219 medical students (85 men and 134 women) in Zahedan, Iran, in 2022, were selected by convenience sampling method and evaluated using the socio-demographic information form (including age, gender, and medical education level), Spiritual Intelligence Self-Report Inventory, 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory, and Euthanasia Attitude Scale, followed by using SPSS v25 for data analysis. The study results showed that openness to experience positively and spiritual intelligence negatively associated with attitude toward euthanasia. Also, the regression analysis revealed that spiritual intelligence had a moderating role in the relationship between openness to experience and attitude toward euthanasia. It seems that paying attention to personality differences and spiritual intelligence training among medical students can play an important role in changing their attitudes toward euthanasia.

Might the bioethical principle of individual decisional autonomy have a politically liberalizing effect on soft authoritarian communities?

According to the bioethical principle of individual decisional autonomy, the patient has a right of informed consent to any medical or experimental procedure. The principle is politically liberal by advocating significant individual freedom as guaranteed by law and secured by civil liberties. When practiced in illiberal communities, might it have a political liberalizing effect? I respond first by analyzing cross-national norms of individual decisional autonomy to identify tensions with illiberal community; second, by examining examining Singapore in a single case study to show that liberal bioethics does not promote political liberalization; and third, by showing that the possibility of practicing liberal bioethics in research, clinically as well as in education, does not require a democratic order, and that liberal bioethics is unlikely to encourage the liberalization of illiberal political communities. Hence, it may never contribute to the development of globally effective cross-national norms for the legal regulation of bioethical research and clinical practice. Fourth, to bolster this analysis, I anticipate several possible objections to various of its aspects.

Public perception of guilt and deserved punishment in medical cannabis diversion

INTRODUCTION

Illegal drug diversion is a well-documented social problem that has received little research attention, despite the growing use of medical cannabis (MC) worldwide. This study examines public attitudes towards the punishment of MC diversion in Israel.

METHOD

We used a quantitative method. Participants were 399 Israelis who were given five scenarios of MC diversion to persons with and without a licence, with and without payment, and for personal profit.

RESULTS

Respondents' attitudes differed with respect to the guilt and deserved punishment of the traffickers as a function of whether the recipient did or did not have a licence and did or did not pay for the MC. Transfers to individuals without a licence and for payment were judged more harshly than those to individuals without payment, whether or not they had a licence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The discussion addresses the findings with reference to Kohlberg's moral development theory. The findings of the study attest to the importance of public attitudes in shaping legal policy in Israel.

Practical Issues of Medical Experts in Assessing Persons With Mental Illness Asking for Assisted Dying in Switzerland

With about 65,000 deaths per year in Switzerland, about 1,000 assisted suicides of Swiss citizens are carried out with the help of assisted dying organizations per year. Assisted suicide, which is carried out without selfish motives on the side of the helping person, only remains unpunished if there is a free will decision by the person willing to die who has the capacity of judgement and to act independently. While this is usually accepted as an option for somatically terminally ill patients in society at large, this procedure is controversial for psychiatrically ill patients. In Switzerland the topic of assisted dying is highly debated between medical professionals. In 2018, the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMS) put revised guidelines into force, which are in discrepancy to the current rules of the Swiss Medical Association (FMH). This article gives an overview of the past and current development of the Code of Professional Conduct and medical-ethical guidelines as well as current Swiss criminal and medical law on this topic. Practical implications for the assessment of assessing persons with mental illness in this circumstances are discussed. It is to be concluded, that persons with a mental illness seem to face extra obstacles in relation with somatically ill persons as the assessment of the prerequisites comprises additional requirements. Among other issues there is an urgent need for the elaboration of contents to be assessed and standards of procedures. The procedures and guidelines to be elaborated should be scientifically accompanied in order to gain a more reliable basis for decision-making. Multidisciplinary assessments would help to avoid biases and blind spots of a mono-disciplinary assessments. In addition, even in the case of mentally ill people, their right to self-determined suicide should not be restricted by excessive hurdles in the assessment process. Lastly, reliable funding should be secured, as it is otherwise to be expected that the complex assessment of prerequisites through multi-professional-teams or just one assessor cannot be sustained. The exercise of fundamental rights must be possible for all persons to the same extent, regardless of their financial resources.