A retrospective review of veterans' adherence to allergen immunotherapy over 10 years

Causes of Non-Adherence to Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: A Foundation towards a Patient-Personalized Approach

BACKGROUND

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying therapy for allergic conditions, resulting in a long-lasting tolerance beyond the duration of the treatment. Due to the strong relationship between the effectiveness, its optimal duration (at least three years) and the observation of the correct administration protocol, appropriate adherence to the plan of treatment represents a critical factor for the therapeutical success of AIT.

METHODS

Analysis of studies about the rate of adherence in subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy, which are the main routes of administration of AIT.

RESULTS

There are different causes leading to a premature interruption of the therapy or to it being incorrectly carried out; the most reported include erroneous expectations of the effectiveness and the adverse effects, economic issues, inconvenience and unrelated clinical conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

An attentive analysis of the main causes of dropouts may be useful to improve the management of these patients and to develop new strategies for a personalized approach. These strategies should be dynamic, involving attentive communication between the physician and the patient about all the possible criticalities, especially in the initial phase of the therapy, and facilitating, as much as possible, access to healthcare providers over the course of the maintenance phase, including by exploiting technological tools.

Geographical and socioeconomic differences in compliance with and access to allergen immunotherapy in Denmark: A nationwide registry-based study - 1998-2016

BACKGROUND

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a cost-effective treatment option in moderate-severe allergic rhino-conjunctivitis. Inequality in access to AIT and variation in compliance related to socioeconomic status or geographical location have not been described previously.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate access to grass pollen AIT at various educational attainment levels in the five regions of Denmark. Furthermore, grass pollen AIT treatment compliance was evaluated with respect to age, educational attainment and geographical area.

METHODS

The unique civil registration number of every citizen in Denmark was combined with the nationwide Danish National Health Service Prescription Database and Statistics Denmark Database to extract age, gender, residence and educational attainment of every citizen who collected prescribed AIT medication from 1998 to 2016. Then, compliance and use of AIT were calculated with respect to age, geographical location and educational attainment.

RESULTS

The use of subcutaneous AIT (SCIT) was significantly higher in the Capital Region; this difference was less predominant for sublingual AIT (SLIT). People who were educated only to primary school or vocational training levels were less frequent users of AIT. Compliance was especially low in the Capital Region and among people educated only to primary school level. In the age groups, compliance was similar, apart from SLIT users aged 0-9, for whom compliance was higher.

CONCLUSION

This nationwide study finds that SLIT has the potential to reduce inequality in access to AIT. A focus intervention is needed to facilitate access to and compliance with AIT in groups with lower socioeconomic status.

Compliance in subcutaneous and sublingual allergen immunotherapy: A nationwide study

INTRODUCTION

Allergic rhino-conjunctivitis is a highly prevalent condition. In moderate to severe cases, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a cost-effective therapeutic option. Previous data have reported a large difference in treatment compliance of subcutaneously (SCIT) and sublingually (SLIT) administered AIT.

METHODS

By use of the unique civil registration number assigned to all Danish citizens and the Danish National Health Service Prescription Database, compliance rates of all patients prescribed with grass pollen AIT from January 1998 until December 2016 were analysed annually during the three-year treatment period.

RESULTS

The male/female ratio was close to 1:1 in SCIT, while SLIT was more frequently used by men. A large proportion of users was children or adolescents (32% and 45%, SCIT and SLIT, respectively). Compliance of both subcutaneous and sublingual treatment gradually fell each year; compliance in year 3 was 57% and 53% for subcutaneous and sublingual treatment, respectively. Compliance of grass pollen sublingual treatment was also analysed each year after registration on the Danish market. Compliance significantly increased following the introduction and stabilised on a relatively high level.

CONCLUSION

Based on previous studies, we hypothesised that AIT compliance would be low, especially in SLIT. However, in Denmark, compliance in SCIT and SLIT was almost similar, and the majority of patients completed the three-year treatment period with a compliance in the last quintile.

Factors Associated with Adherence to Allergen Specific Subcutaneous Immunotherapy

PURPOSE

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is known to be the only therapeutic modality to alter the natural course of allergic diseases. However, at least 3 years of treatment is recommended for achieving long-term disease modifying effect. This study aimed to investigate factors associated with immunotherapy non-adherence in real practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis, asthma, or atopic dermatitis, and received AIT to common allergens such as house dust mite and/or pollens from January 2007 to August 2014. In this study, non-adherence was defined as not completing 3 years of AIT.

RESULTS

Among 1162 patients enrolled, 228 (19.6%) failed to complete 3 years of AIT. In multivariate analysis, age less than 20 years [odds ratio (OR) 3.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70-5.69] and 20 to 40 years (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.17-3.43), cluster build-up (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.05-3.02) and ultra-rush build-up schedules (OR 5.46, 95% CI 2.40-12.43), and absence of visit to other departments in the same hospital (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.05-3.32) were independently associated with immunotherapy non-adherence. Disease duration of 5-10 years was negatively associated with non-adherence compared to shorter disease duration of less than 5 years (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.94). Although male sex and commercial product of AIT, Tyrosine S®, compared to Novo-Helisen® were non-adherent factors in univariate analysis, no statistical significances were identified in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Various factors are associated with immunotherapy adherence affecting the utility of immunotherapy. Clinicians should be aware of factors associated with adherence to maximize the utility of allergen-specific subcutaneous immunotherapy.

Cost of subcutaneous immunotherapy in a large insured population in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects up to 40% of the United States population, with approximately $11 billion annual medical costs. Allergy immunotherapy is the best option for long-term symptomatic relief, but treatment compliance can be low. The objective was to describe subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT)-related costs for patients overall and those with inconsistent treatment.

METHODS

This study observed commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D health plan enrollees. Included subjects had claims with AR diagnostic codes during 1 January 2011-31 December 2015 and ≥1 SCIT claim during 1 January 2013-31 December 2015 (index date = first SCIT claim date). A control sample was chosen randomly at a 1:3 ratio of SCIT to controls. Inconsistent use was defined as a ≥90 day gap after ≥1 SCIT. Patient characteristics were compared between SCIT patients and controls. Costs were calculated for all SCIT patients and the inconsistent subgroup.

RESULTS

Compared with controls (n = 394,479), SCIT (n = 131,493) patients were younger (39.3 vs. 41.4 years), more likely female (56.4% vs. 50.7%) and more likely in a commercial plan (91.6% vs. 83.6%); all p < .001. Among SCIT patients, 15.1% had inconsistent use. Among all SCIT patients, the 3 year total plan-paid SCIT-related costs were $205,741,125 (18% was for inconsistent subgroup) and patient-paid costs were $47,560,450 (15% for inconsistent). Per-member-per-month costs were $0.48 plan-paid and $0.11 patient-paid, with $0.09 plan-paid and $0.02 patient-paid for inconsistent use.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed 15% of patients may have costly inconsistent SCIT treatment. Greater understanding is needed regarding the reasons for inconsistent use of subcutaneous allergy immunotherapy.

Compliance with allergen immunotherapy and factors affecting compliance among patients with respiratory allergies

BACKGROUND

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is safe and effective for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. However, patient non-compliance is a major barrier to achieving optimal outcomes Objective: To determine the level of compliance among patients using AIT and to identify factors associated with non-compliance Methods: A retrospective analysis using questionnaires was conducted to study compliance among 236 patients with allergic rhinitis with or without asthma who began AIT in 2009 or 2010 Results: The compliance rates at 3 y were 58.7% among patients on subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and 11.6% among those on sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). The mean durations of treatment with SCIT and SLIT were 31 (+/-18.3) and 15.9 (+/-14.7) months, respectively. The most common causes of non-compliance among patients on SCIT were the frequency of injections (82.2%), the duration of treatment (70.9%), and commuting to the Allergy Center (67.7%). Reasons for non-compliance among patients on SLIT were related to inconvenience (43.4%), improvement without treatment (30.2%) and perception of poor efficacy (25.0%) Conclusion: Compliance with AIT is low, but at 3 years, it was higher among patients on SCIT than among patients on SLIT. Reasons for non-compliance include difficulty adjusting to treatment protocols and a perception that the efficacy is low. Patient education regarding the treatment course and the slow effect, as well as the need for close follow up to effectively prevent and treat adverse reactions, are important factors for improving compliance and treatment outcomes.

Adherence and systemic reaction rates to allergy immunotherapy among veterans

Background:

Although allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is effective and safe, nonadherence is common. Limited data exist regarding adherence to AIT, factors that affect adherence, and systemic reactions associated with AIT among veteran populations.

Objective:

To evaluate adherence to AIT and the prevalence of reactions secondary to AIT among patients at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed of veterans who received AIT at a single Veterans Affairs facility. Age, race, sex, the total number of shots, travel distance, a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and the number of severe adverse reactions were compared between the veterans who were adherent and veterans who were nonadherent.

Results:

The overall adherence rate was 60.9%. Factors associated with adherence were a chart diagnosis of PTSD (29.3% [adherent group] versus 13.6% [nonadherent group]; p = 0.03) and home residence being a further distance from the facility (21.9 miles / 35.2 kilometers [adherent group] versus 18.0 miles / 28.9 kilometers [nonadherent group]; p = 0.03). Patients who were adherent received an average of more total injections compared with patients who were nonadherent. Age, sex, race, and history of systemic reactions during AIT displayed no statistically significant differences between the groups. There were a total of 20 systemic reactions, and the systemic reaction rate was 0.2% per AIT encounter and 0.1% per injection.

Conclusion:

AIT adherence and systemic reaction rates among veterans at our facility was comparable with similar studies. Adherence was associated with a chart diagnosis of PTSD and home residence that was further away from the clinic.

Non-adherence to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy: inadequate health insurance coverage is the leading cause

BACKGROUND

To sustain the long-lasting beneficial effects of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy, the recommended duration of treatment is 3 to 5 years. Nevertheless, many patients discontinue allergy injections prematurely and therefore might not appreciate the full therapeutic benefit.

OBJECTIVE

To examine factors leading to premature discontinuation of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (cessation before completion of the recommended duration).

METHODS

Patients who discontinued immunotherapy before the completion of the prescribed duration and received their final injection from January 2008 through September 2013 were contacted to identify the reason for stopping the allergy injections. Phase of treatment (escalation or maintenance) was used to measure the duration of treatment at the time of cessation and patients were grouped accordingly.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 555 patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma who terminated immunotherapy prematurely. Two hundred thirteen (38%) were men and 342 (62%) were women. The following reasons were cited by patients for non-adherence to immunotherapy: requirement of copayment for allergy injections and/or payment for allergen extract by their health insurer (40%); inconvenience of travel (15%); change of residence (8%); concurrent health problems (5%); patient-perceived ineffectiveness (4%); patient-perceived lack of need to continue immunotherapy (2%); adverse effects from injection (local reaction 1%; systemic allergic reaction 0.5%); and trial of alternative medicine (0.1%). The remaining 24.4% did not provide a reason for discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Of the various factors, inadequate reimbursement for allergen extract and allergy injections by health insurers is the most common reason cited for non-adherence to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy.

Current developments for improving efficacy of allergy vaccines

Allergic diseases are prevalent worldwide. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a current treatment for allergy, leading to modification of the natural course of disease. Mechanisms of efficacy include Treg through release of IL-10 and TGF-β and specific IgG4 blocking antibodies. Subcutaneous and sublingual routes are popular, but uptake is limited by inconvenience and safety concerns. Inclusion criteria limit application to a small proportion of allergic patients. New forms of immunotherapy are being investigated for more efficacious, convenient and safer options with promising advances in recent years. The rationale of reducing vaccine allergenicity to increase safety while improving immunogenicity led to investigation of T-cell epitope-based peptides and recombinant allergen derivatives. Additionally, different routes of administration and adjuvants and adjunct therapies are being explored. This review discusses the current status of AIT and recent advances to improve clinical efficacy, safety and long-term immune tolerance.

Prospective adherence to specific immunotherapy in Europe (PASTE) survey protocol

BACKGROUND

Adherence to allergen immunotherapy is important for its effectiveness. There is currently limited data available on allergen immunotherapy adherence outside of clinical trials i.e. in real-life clinical practice. As part of a European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Immunotherapy Interest group initiative, we endeavoured to design a survey in order to prospectively evaluate adherence to subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy across different European countries.

METHOD/DESIGN

The inclusion criteria for this prospective, multi-country survey were set as: adults, starting clinically indicated allergen immunotherapy for respiratory allergic disorders or Hymenoptera venom allergy. An online survey was designed in order to enrol participants and assess adherence to immunotherapy. Eight countries (Czech Republic, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain) were selected to reflect different parts of Europe and differences in allergens and routes of immunotherapy administration. Each country has an allocated National co-ordinator that has identified local Allergy departments willing to enrol participants in this survey. Each participant will be followed up for a total of three years. In order to assess adherence, a 4-monthly follow-up form detailing any missed doses and reasons will be completed online. In case of a participant discontinuing treatment, reasons for this will be recorded.

DISCUSSION

The use of online survey software has enabled us to make this survey a reality and reach clinicians in different countries. Forty-five centres have enrolled a total of over 1,350 participants. It is hoped that this prospective real life survey will enable us to gain a better understanding of reasons that affect adherence to subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy and assist in developing ways to improve this.

Nanoparticle based-immunotherapy against allergy

Allergic diseases are one of the most prevalent diseases, reaching epidemic proportions in developed countries. An allergic reaction occurs after contact with an environmental protein, such as inhalants allergens (pollen, animal dander, house dust mites), or food proteins. This response is known as part of the type 2 immunity that is counterbalanced by Type 1 immunity and Tregs. Widely used allergen-specific immunotherapy (IT) is a long term treatment to induce such switch from Th2 to Th1 response. However, conventional IT requires multiple allergen injections over a long period of time and is not free of risk of producing allergic reactions. As a consequence, new safer and faster immunotherapeutic methods are required. This review deals with allergen IT using nanoparticles as allergen delivery system that will allow a different way of administration, reduce dose and diminish allergen exposure to IgE bound to mast cells or basophils.

Selection of patients for sublingual versus subcutaneous immunotherapy

Allergen immunotherapy is the sole treatment for IgE-mediated allergic diseases directed at the underlying mechanism. The two widely accepted administration routes are sublingual (SLIT) and subcutaneous (SCIT). We reviewed how patients should best be selected for immunotherapy and how the optimal administration route can be defined. Before deciding SCIT or SLIT, appropriate selection of patients for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is mandatory. To be eligible for AIT, subjects must have a clear medical history of allergic disease, with exacerbation of symptoms on exposure to one or more allergens and a corresponding positive skin or in vitro test. Then the route of administration should be based on: published evidence of clinical and immunologic efficacy (which varies per allergic disease and per allergen); mono- or multi-allergen immunotherapy, for SLIT multi-allergen immunotherapy was not effective; safety: adverse events with SLIT are more frequent, but less severe; and, costs and patient preferences, closely related to adherence issues. All these are discussed in the article.