Pediatricians underestimate parent receptiveness to early peanut introduction

Psychosocial Impact of Food Allergy on Children and Adults and Practical Interventions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

IgE- and non-IgE-mediated food allergies are increasing in prevalence in children and adults worldwide. A food allergy diagnosis can be associated with a sense of overwhelm and stress and commonly has a negative impact on quality of life.

RECENT FINDINGS

While there is an increased recognition of the psychosocial effects of food allergy, the current research reflects the experience of mostly White, well-educated wealthier populations. Some studies have now explored the psychosocial impact among other populations; however, further study is needed. It is important that physicians and allied health professionals screen for the potentially negative psychosocial effects of food allergy and provide education to promote safety and self-efficacy at each visit; however, time may be a limiting factor. Numerous validated questionnaires are now available to help assess the psychosocial impact of food allergies. Allergy-friendly foods are typically more expensive, and thus, it is imperative that physicians screen for food insecurity as well. Educational resources should be offered regarding living well with food allergies at each visit. For patients and families experiencing anxiety or food allergy burden that is difficult to manage, referral to a mental health provider should be considered. Resources regarding programs to help accessing safe foods should also be available. Further research is needed among diverse populations focusing on interventions to best support patients and families with food allergy.

Early Peanut Introduction in Infants: Improving Guideline Adherence With EMR Standardization

OBJECTIVES

Peanut allergy in children is a population health problem. Evidence suggests early peanut introduction (EPI) for infants can reduce the development of peanut allergy. Primary care settings have not widely adopted guidelines recommending EPI. Peanut allergy prevention depends on primary care providers incorporating EPI guidelines into well-child check (WCC) encounters. We aimed to improve guideline adherence in a primary care setting by implementing a bundle of clinical decision support (CDS) tools.

METHODS

Using quality improvement methodology, the team developed a standardized work protocol and CDS tools within an electronic medical record (EMR) at 4, 6, and 9-month WCC encounters. The team executed changes and modifications through plan-do-study-act cycles and analyzed results with statistical process control charts.

RESULTS

We collected data from 445 WCC encounters from baseline through sustainability. EMR documentation of EPI guidance at 4, 6, and 9-month WCCs shifted from 13.9% to 83.5% over 12 months. Provider adoption of smart lists and templates increased from 2% to 73%, the distribution of home peanut introduction handouts increased from 5.2% to 54.1%, and caregiver-reported peanut ingestion increased from 0% to 34.6%. Diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination rates remained at 100% for 6-month visits, and patient in-room time remained at 65 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality improvement methodology improved documentation of EPI guidance and increased reported peanut ingestion at routine WCC encounters without impacting other measures. Broader use of bundled CDS tools and EMR standardization could further improve guideline adherence and increase early peanut introduction to prevent peanut allergy in infants.

Food allergen introduction patterns in the first year of life: A US nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Prevention guidelines have changed over the past decade and now recommend the earlier introduction of peanut and egg without delaying the introduction of other food allergens. This paper explored caregiver practices regarding the introduction of food allergens during infancy.

METHODS

A survey was administered (2021) to a US population-based sample of 3062 caregivers (children 7 months - 3.5 years). Demographics and feeding practices were collected. Weighted frequencies and proportions were calculated using the svyr package in R 4.1. Survey-weighted chi-square statistics and covariate-adjusted, survey-weighted logistic regression models were used for statistical inference.

RESULTS

Cow's milk, wheat, and soy were the top three allergens introduced. Peanut and egg were introduced by 17.2% and 15.5% of caregivers before 7 months and 58.8% and 66.4% before 1 year, respectively. The age of peanut and egg introduction differed significantly by race/ethnicity (p < .001) and caregiver age (p < .001). Peanut and egg introduction before 7 months was significantly associated with the increased introduction of other allergenic foods before 1 year (p = <.001; peanut and p = < .001; egg). Caregivers who introduced peanut and egg before 7 months infant age fed an additional mean of 5.4 and 4.5 food allergens, respectively, before 1 year. Few caregivers (0.9%) reported feeding an "early food allergen introduction product" ≥ 3 times, which was significantly associated with parental food allergy (OR = 2.2) and previously seen an allergist (OR = 6.7).

CONCLUSION

More than half of the caregivers are not introducing peanut by age of one year and one-third are not introducing egg, though an observed shift toward earlier peanut and egg introduction was seen in the past 5 years. Peanut and egg introduction seem to co-occur and are associated with increased intake of other food allergens.

International Peanut Allergy Prevention, 6 Years After the Learning Early About Peanut Study

Six years ago, the Learning Early About Peanut (LEAP) trial findings helped fundamentally shift the paradigm of peanut allergy prevention. Although the results of LEAP are well accepted, policy-makers, caregivers, and clinicians struggle with how best to implement and apply the study's key findings in clinical practice. Differences in guidelines highlight issues related to peanut allergy prevention implementation, including caregiver acceptability, cost, fidelity, feasibility, appropriateness, and adoption. The goals of this rostrum are to review how the LEAP study has informed international peanut allergy prevention policy, as well as to review the strengths and ongoing controversies in peanut allergy prevention implementation.

Early Peanut Introduction and Testing: A Framework for General Pediatrician Beliefs and Practices

Background: Peanut introduction guidelines have undergone significant reversal since 2001 from recommending delayed introduction to rescinding the recommendations in 2008 to actively recommending early introduction of peanut between 4 and 11 months of age in high-risk infants in 2015. This qualitative study aims to explore pediatrician beliefs, practices, facilitators, and barriers regarding peanut introduction and testing. Methods: General pediatricians from academic, private, large group, and underserved practices in Northern California underwent individual semi-structured interviews in 2017. We asked about experiences surrounding infant peanut introduction, strategies for staying up-to-date with current recommendations, and barriers and facilitators to the new peanut introduction and testing recommendations. The data were coded, and using grounded theory methodology, a conceptual framework was developed around early peanut introduction and testing in infants. Results: Eighteen general pediatricians participated. We identified barriers that may contribute to pediatrician reluctance to recommending early peanut introduction or testing including lack of awareness, lack of agreement, lack of resources, and lack of outcome expectancy. A framework was created that suggests that pediatricians need to be knowledgeable about new recommendations, agree with the recommendations, have resources to carry out the counseling and testing, and have buy-in from the parents in order for successful uptake of peanut introduction guidelines. Conclusion: Recommending early peanut introduction or testing causes significant apprehension in some pediatricians, and there are many barriers to following recent early peanut introduction recommendations. A potential limitation of the study is that it was conducted right after the addendum guidelines were changed, leaving the possibility that attitudes and practices may have evolved since 2017. It is still likely that a multifaceted approach that addresses primary care provider guideline awareness, limited primary care resources for education and testing, and includes support and collaboration from subspecialty practices is more likely to lead to improved early peanut introduction uptake.

Food Allergy Prevention: More Than Peanut

Given an apparent increase in food allergies worldwide, the focus on prevention strategies has intensified. Following the Learning Early About Peanut study, there is now a widespread acceptance that peanut should be introduced promptly into the diet of high-risk infants. However, most food allergies are caused by triggers other than peanut and additional prevention strategies are being evaluated. The appreciation of the role of an impaired skin barrier in the process of food sensitization and subsequent allergy has led to a spectrum of dermatologically orientated studies. Other prevention strategies address the role of the microbiome, dietary components, and other modifiable risk factors. With regard to early introduction of foods other than peanut, studies are heterogeneous in design and governmental and professional society response to the early introduction trials has varied, ranging from new guidelines confining advice specifically to peanut, to ones recommending prompt introduction of a broad spectrum of allergenic foods. Much remains to be determined with regard to the acceptability and uptake of the new guidelines and their impact on infant feeding behavior and food allergy outcomes. This review discusses the panoply of prevention approaches, their promise, and limitations.

Evaluation of the introduction of allergen-containing foods: Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study 2016

BACKGROUND

Guidelines on the early introduction of allergen-containing foods are evolving; however, little national data exist defining current allergen-feeding practices.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the consumption rates of foods containing egg and peanut among infants and toddlers before the guideline changes in 2017.

METHODS

The Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study 2016 was conducted nationally among 3235 caregivers with a child under 4 years of age. The 24-hour dietary recalls were reviewed for peanut or egg ingredients. Participants were categorized as "consuming peanut or egg-containing foods" or "not consuming peanut or egg-containing foods." Data on physician-diagnosed food allergies and avoidance were collected.

RESULTS

The consumption rates of peanut- and egg-containing foods were low. For the age group of 4 to 5.9 months, 0.3% reported peanut consumption and 2.4% reported egg consumption. For the age group of 6 to 8.9 months, 0.9% reported eating peanut-containing foods and 13.0% egg, and for the age group of 9 to 11.9 months, 5.5% were consuming peanut-containing foods and 33.2% egg-containing foods. Peanut or egg ingredients were identified in the diet of children whose caregivers reported avoidance.

CONCLUSION

Before the publication of the 2017 Addendum Guidelines for the Prevention of Peanut Allergy, there were low rates of reported peanut consumption across the study population with less than 1% of any age group before 9 months of age and less than 6% in any age group before 12 months of age consuming peanut on the 24-hour recall day. In addition, reported egg consumption was low and increased with age. These results serve as an important baseline comparison for future studies evaluating the implementation and impact of early peanut and egg introduction.

A study to assess current approaches of allergists in European countries diagnosing and managing children and adolescents with peanut allergy

RATIONALE

Food allergy is documented to result in considerable morbidity, negative impact on quality of life, and substantial medical care costs. Although anecdotal data suggest widely varying practices in the diagnosis and management of food allergies, the diversity and relative frequency of these practices have not been documented.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed evaluating allergists' management approaches of individuals with peanut allergy (PA) in Germany (DE), France (FR), and the United Kingdom (UK).

RESULTS

Here, we report the survey results from a total of 109 allergists from DE, FR and the UK. They reported to confirm PA at initial diagnosis using skin prick test (≥60%), while allergists from DE and FR reported using allergen-specific IgE testing more (>86%) compared to the UK (<50%). At initial diagnosis, oral food challenge was used less in DE (13%) and FR (14%) and very rarely in the UK (3%) to confirm diagnosis. Recognition of acute reactions, use of adrenaline auto-injectors and allergen avoidance were reported to be discussed with the patient/caregiver at the initial office visit by most allergists (>75%). Half of the responders reported assessing the patient's quality of life. 63% allergists reported retesting for PA resolution at a later date, with 45% allergists indicated to recommend ingestion of a normal serving of peanut regularly upon resolution. Lack of effective PA treatment was reported to be a 'very significant' barrier for optimal PA treatment, with allergists being less than 'moderately familiar' with data from clinical trials testing new treatments options for PA. Lastly, allergists stated that the severity of patient's PA ranked as the most important factor in their decision to recommend oral immunotherapy for PA treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provides essential insights into the practice of allergists and highlights some areas that would inform strategies for education and improving PA healthcare.

Practical Challenges and Considerations for Early Introduction of Potential Food Allergens for Prevention of Food Allergy

Recent randomized controlled trials aimed at the prevention of food allergy have led to sweeping changes in food allergy prevention guidelines. Emphasis is now on the introduction of potential food allergens, particularly peanut and egg, rather than avoidance. Although guidelines recommend against delaying the introduction of other potential allergens, there remains little or no evidence of the benefit of their early introduction. Parents and physicians alike report a need for greater guidance and resources on early potential allergen introduction in the complementary feeding period. A thorough understanding of early introduction literature, current prevention guidelines, and infant nutrition will empower physicians to address patient needs and concerns both when advice is established as effective and where uncertainty remains. We discuss the state of the science, compare recommendations between guidelines, and provide practical options to introduce allergenic foods, alongside other complementary foods, within the first year of life. We include a review of the available literature, including review and suggestions of potential doses of food allergens, and the first published comparison of commercially available products and homemade early introduction foods to help clinicians support their patients. We address the nutritional, dietary, and practical considerations of introducing food allergens in the first year of life while adhering to infant feeding guidelines. Finally, given the limitations of existing guidelines, we review the need for shared decision-making between physicians and parents regarding early allergen introduction.

Pros and cons of pre-emptive screening programmes before peanut introduction in infancy

Peanut allergy is an important public health concern and causes substantial psychosocial comorbidity. Although fatal anaphylaxis is rare (occurring at 0·03-0·3 per million person-years in the general population), peanuts are one of the most frequent causes of food allergy mortality. The Learning Early About Peanut study transformed prevention of peanut allergy by showing that early introduction of peanut into the diet of children at high risk (ie, those with an egg allergy or severe eczema) reduced the relative risk of peanut allergy at age 5 years by 81%. Following publication of this study, the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health, convened an expert panel, which recommended that, for infants with severe eczema or egg allergy, health professionals should strongly consider evaluation with peanut-specific serological IgE or skin prick test (or both) and, if necessary, an oral food challenge before peanut introduction. In the USA, depending on test results, peanut-containing foods are recommended to be introduced from age 4-6 months in infants with severe eczema or egg allergy. Early introduction to peanuts is also advocated for children with either mild to moderate or no eczema, and in children who are not allergic to egg, but without screening before peanut introduction. However, the NIAID addendum guidelines contrast with other international approaches that do not advocate for allergy screening at a population level before introducing peanuts into infants' diets. In this Review, we evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of a pre-emptive screening approach before the early introduction of peanuts in infants at high risk of peanut allergy.

Implementation of the Addendum Guidelines for Peanut Allergy Prevention by US allergists, a survey conducted by the NIAID, in collaboration with the AAAAI

BACKGROUND

In 2017, the Addendum Guidelines for the Prevention of Peanut Allergy were published with recommendations on early introduction of peanut-containing foods based on infants' clinical history.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to conduct a nationwide US survey to assess Guidelines implementation among allergists and immunologists who manage infants for food allergy.

METHODS

Survey invitations were delivered to 3281 nonretired, US members of the American Academy of Asthma, Allergy & Immunology, board certified in allergy and immunology. The survey assessed awareness and implementation of the Guidelines and barriers to implementation. Descriptive statistics were generated.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine percent (946 of 3281) of surveyed allergists/immunologists responded, and 87.1% (825 of 946) of responders met eligibility criteria. Among eligible responders, 97.1% were aware of the Guidelines. Of these, 64.5% reported full implementation of the Guidelines as published, 34.4% reported partial implementation, and 1.1% reported using none of the Guidelines. Barriers to Guidelines use included parental (47.6%) and self (21.8%) concerns about allergic reactions, lack of referrals (33.6%), parents uninterested in early feeding (28.2%), and lack of clinic time (20.9%). The 2 most common deviations from the Guidelines were considering additional factors not specified in the Guidelines such as family history (50.2%) and conducting skin prick testing in non-high-risk children (43.9%). Of respondents using the Guidelines, 45.7% indicated they needed more education or training.

CONCLUSIONS

Essentially all allergists/immunologists who responded to the survey reported full or partial Guidelines implementation. Parental concerns and lack of referrals are major identifiable barriers. Improved Guidelines messaging to parents and referring physicians is warranted.