1
|
Sáenz de Santa María R, Bogas G, Labella M, Ariza A, Salas M, Doña I, Torres MJ. Approach for delabeling beta-lactam allergy in children. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2023; 4:1298335. [PMID: 38033918 PMCID: PMC10684789 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1298335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
A considerable number of pediatric patients treated with beta-lactam (BL) antibiotics develop delayed onset of skin rashes during the course of treatment. Although the most frequent cause of these symptoms is infectious, many cases are labeled as allergic reactions to these drugs. BL allergy labels could have a negative impact, as they imply avoidance of this group of drugs and the use of second-line antibiotics, leading to a potential increase in adverse effects and the utilization of less effective therapies. This constitutes a major public health concern and economic burden, as the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics can result in multidrug-resistant organisms and prolonged hospital stays. Therefore, it is crucial to delabel patients during childhood to avoid false labeling in adult life. Although the label of BL allergy is among the most frequent causes of allergy referral, its management remains controversial, and new diagnostic perspectives are changing the paradigm of managing BL allergies in children. Traditionally, drug provocation testing (DPT) was exclusively performed in patients who had previously obtained negative results from skin tests (STs). However, the sensitivity of STs is low, and the role of in vitro testing in the pediatric population is not well defined. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety of direct DPT without prior ST or serum tests for pediatric patients who report a low-risk reaction to BLs, which is cost-effective. However, there is still a debate on the optimal allergic workup to be performed in children with a benign immediate reaction and the management of children with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions. In this review, we will discuss the impact of the label of BL allergy and the role of the different tools currently available to efficiently address BL allergy delabeling in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Sáenz de Santa María
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - G. Bogas
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - M. Labella
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - A. Ariza
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - M. Salas
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - I. Doña
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - M. J. Torres
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology-BIONAND, Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, Málaga, Spain
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Facultad de Medicina, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holmes MD, Vo N, Rafeq R, Byrne D, King M. Administration of β-lactam antibiotics to patients with reported penicillin allergy in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 2023; 68:119-123. [PMID: 36972634 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND β-lactam antibiotics are amongst the most commonly prescribed medications in the Emergency Department (ED) due to their role in empiric sepsis therapy; however, inferior therapeutic options are often utilized due to a reported allergy; penicillin (PCN) being most frequent. In the United States, 10% of the population endorses an allergic reaction to PCN while <1% experience IgE-mediated reactions. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and outcome of patients in the ED whose PCN allergies were challenged with β-lactam antibiotics. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients in the ED at an academic medical center aged ≥18, and who received a β-lactam despite a reported PCN allergy between January 2015 and December 2019. Patients who did not receive a β-lactam or did not report a PCN allergy prior to administration were excluded. The primary outcome was the frequency of IgE-mediated reactions in response to β-lactam administration. A secondary outcome assessed the frequency of continuation of β-lactams upon admission from the ED. RESULTS 819 patients were included (66% female) with prior reported PCN reactions: hives (22.5%), rash (15.4%), swelling (6.2%), anaphylaxis (3.5%), other (12.1%), or undocumented on medical electronic record (40.3%). No patients experienced an IgE-mediated reaction to the β-lactam administered in the ED. Previously reported allergies had no effect on the continuation of β-lactams when admitted or discharged (OR: 1, 95% CI: 0.7-1.44). Patients who had a history of an IgE-mediated penicillin allergy were frequently continued (77%) on a β-lactam after leaving the ED via admission or discharge. CONCLUSION β-lactam administration in patients with previously reported PCN allergies did not result in any IgE-mediated reactions nor in an increase in adverse reactions. Our data contributes to the body of evidence that supports the administration of β-lactams to patients with documented PCN allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Holmes
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, 401 Broadway, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
| | - Nina Vo
- Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, University of the Sciences, 600 South 43rd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Rachel Rafeq
- Cooper University Health Care, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
| | - Dana Byrne
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, 401 Broadway, Camden, NJ 08103, USA; Cooper University Health Care, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ 08103, USA
| | - Madeline King
- Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, University of the Sciences, 600 South 43rd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Cooper University Health Care, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ 08103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Srisuwatchari W, Phinyo P, Chiriac AM, Saokaew S, Kulalert P. The Safety of the Direct Drug Provocation Test in Beta-Lactam Hypersensitivity in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:506-518. [PMID: 36528293 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct drug provocation test (DPT) without prior skin testing (ST) has been investigated in children suspected of being at risk for beta-lactam (BL) hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has investigated the efficacy and safety of direct DPT for BL-HSR in children. OBJECTIVE To investigate the prevalence of BL-HSR by direct DPT and the safety of direct DPT in children. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL from their inception to July 23, 2022, for studies that performed direct DPT in children with suspected BL-HSR, or for studies that performed DPT in all cases with ST results, but they ignored the ST results. The true prevalence was defined as the proportion of children who experienced an HSR during direct DPT. Safety was determined according to the proportion of children who developed a dangerous reaction following DPT. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies with 8,334 direct challenges were included. Fifteen studies included patients who presented with either immediate or nonimmediate HSR, and the majority of the index reactions were nonsevere. Amoxicillin/amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was the most commonly used during the DPT. The pooled prevalence of confirmed BL-HSR was 5.23% (95% CI 4.17-6.39; I2 = 72%). Immediate and nonimmediate HSR were reported in 0.8% (95% CI 0.43-1.25; I2 = 55.1%) and 3.69% (95% CI 2.66-4.87; I2 = 79.77%), respectively. Severe reactions were found in 3 cases with the frequency of 0.036% (95% CI 0.012-0.112; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of BL-HSR by direct DPT was 5.23%, and the frequency of severe reactions from direct DPT was very low (0.036%). Our findings support direct DPT as a safe and effective delabeling tool in children with suspected nonsevere BL-HSR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Witchaya Srisuwatchari
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Phichayut Phinyo
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research (MSTR), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Anca Mirela Chiriac
- Division of Allergy, Department of Pulmonology, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; IDESP, UMR UA11, University of Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Surasak Saokaew
- UNIt of Excellence on Clinical Outcomes Research and IntegratioN (UNICORN), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand
| | - Prapasri Kulalert
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beta-lactam allergy and drug challenge test in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Res 2023; 93:22-30. [PMID: 35449396 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-022-02076-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most cases of beta-lactam allergy in children are likely to be mislabeled. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of true positives, as determined by drug challenge tests, and the rate of false negatives in children with suspected allergies and confirm the safety of the drug challenge test. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to established procedures. Study participants were children with suspected beta-lactam allergy who underwent a drug challenge. PubMed MEDLINE, Dialog EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception until March 5, 2021. RESULTS The pooled prevalence of (a) positive results in the first challenge was 0.049 (95% CI, 0.041-0.057; I2 = 71%) from 78 studies; (b) serious adverse events was 0.00 (95% CI, 0.00-0.00; I2 = 0.0%) from 62 studies; and (c) positive results in the second challenge after the first negative result was 0.028 (95% CI, 0.016-0.043; I2 = 38%) from 18 studies. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of children with suspected beta-lactam allergy with true-positive results and false-negative results from the drug challenge test was very low. Serious adverse events resulting from drug challenge tests were also very rare. IMPACT Most children with suspected beta-lactam allergy were likely to be mislabeled. Serious adverse events caused by the drug challenge test were rare. Few false-negative results were obtained from the drug challenge test.
Collapse
|
5
|
Alvarez-Cuesta E, Madrigal-Burgaleta R, Broyles AD, Cuesta-Herranz J, Guzman-Melendez MA, Maciag MC, Phillips EJ, Trubiano JA, Wong JT, Ansotegui I. Standards for practical intravenous rapid drug desensitization & delabeling: A WAO committee statement. World Allergy Organ J 2022; 15:100640. [PMID: 35694005 PMCID: PMC9163606 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to intravenous drugs can be severe and might leave patients and doctors in a difficult position where an essential treatment or intervention has to be suspended. Even if virtually any intravenous medication can potentially trigger a life-threatening DHR, chemotherapeutics, biologics, and antibiotics are amongst the intravenous drugs most frequently involved in these reactions. Admittedly, suspending such treatments may negatively impact the survival outcomes or the quality of life of affected patients. Delabeling pathways and rapid drug desensitization (RDD) can help reactive patients stay on first-choice therapies instead of turning to less efficacious, less cost-effective, or more toxic alternatives. However, these are high-complexity and high-risk techniques, which usually need expert teams and allergy-specific techniques (skin testing, in vitro testing, drug provocation testing) to ensure safety, an accurate diagnosis, and personalized management. Unfortunately, there are significant inequalities within and among countries in access to allergy departments with the necessary expertise and resources to offer these techniques and tackle these DHRs optimally. The main objective of this consensus document is to create a great benefit for patients worldwide by aiding allergists to expand the scope of their practice and support them with evidence, data, and experience from leading groups from around the globe. This statement of the Drug Hypersensitivity Committee of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) aims to be a comprehensive practical guide on the technical aspects of implementing acute-onset intravenous hypersensitivity delabeling and RDD for a wide range of drugs. Thus, the manuscript does not only focus on clinical pathways. Instead, it also provides guidance on topics usually left unaddressed, namely, internal validation, continuous quality improvement, creating a healthy multidisciplinary environment, and redesigning care (including a specific supplemental section on a real-life example of how to design a dedicated space that can combine basic and complex diagnostic and therapeutic techniques in allergy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ricardo Madrigal-Burgaleta
- Allergy & Severe Asthma Service, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Drug Desensitisation Centre, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain
- Corresponding author. Allergy & Severe Asthma Service, Respiratory Department, 4th Floor, King George V Building, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Ana D. Broyles
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Javier Cuesta-Herranz
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, FIIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM, Madrid, Spain
- RETIC ARADyAL, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain
| | | | - Michelle C. Maciag
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth J. Phillips
- Department of Medicine & Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jason A. Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Johnson T. Wong
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Steering Committee AuthorsAliF. RunaMBBS, PhD, FRCPaxAngel-PereiraDenisseMDlBanerjiAleenaMDayBerges-GimenoMaria PilarMD, PhDmBernal-RubioLorenaMDmBrockowKnutMDnCardona VillaRicardoMDoCastellsMariana C.MD, PhDpCaubetJean-ChristophMDqChangYoon-SeokMD, PhDrEnsinaLuis FelipeMD, MSc, PhDsChikhladzeMananaPhDtChiriacAnca MirelaMD, PhDuChungWeng-HungMD, PhDvEbisawaMotohiroMD, PhDwFernandesBryanMBBS, MRCPaxGarveyLene HeiseMD, PhDxawGomezMaximilianoMD, PhDyGomez VeraJavierMDzGonzalez DiazSandraMD, PhDaaHongDavid I.MDpIvancevichJuan CarlosMDabKangHye-RyunMD, PhDacKhanDavid A.MDadKuruvillaMerinMDaeLarco SousaJose IgnacioMDafLatour-StaffeldPatriciaMDagLiuAnne Y.MDahMacyEricMDaiMallingHans JorgenMDajMasperoJorgeMDakMaySara M.MDalMayorgaCristobalinaPhDamParkMiguel A.MDanPeterJonathanMBChB, PhDaoPicardMatthieuMD, FRCPCapRodriguez-BouzaTitoMD, PhDaq2RomanoAntoninoMDarSanchez-BorgesMarioMDazbaTannoLuciana KaseMD, PhDuTorresMaria JoseMD, PhDamUreña-TaveraAliciaMDasValluzziRocco L.MDatVolcheckGerald W.MDauYamaguchiMasaoMD, PhDavHospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, SpainAllergy Division, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, GermanyUniversidad de Antioquia, Medellín, ColombiaDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USAPediatric Allergy Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, SwitzerlandDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaDivision of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Sao Paulo, BrazilMedical Faculty at Akaki Tsereteli State University, KuTaisi, Tskaltubo, GeorgiaDivision of Allergy, Department of Pulmonology, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Linko and Keelung, TaiwanClinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, JapanAllergy Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Copenhagen, DenmarkSchool of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Salta, ArgentinaInstitute of Security and Social Services of State Workers, López Mateos Regional Hospital, Mexico City, MexicoRegional Center of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital “Dr. José Eleuterio González”, Gonzalitos y Madero s/n Colonia Mitras Centro, Monterrey, MexicoServicio de Alergia e Immunologia, Clinica Santa Isabel, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaInstitute of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USADivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USAAllergy Department, Clinica San Felipe, Lima, PeruCentro Avanzado de Alergia y Asma de Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Dominican RepublicStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USASouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USADanish Allergy Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkAllergy and Respiratory Research Unit, Fundación CIDEA, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep & Allergy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USAAllergy Unit and Research Group, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, UMA-IBIMA-BIONAND, ARADyAL, Málaga, SpainDivision of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USADivision of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, CanadaCentro de Patología Alérgica, Hospital Quirón Palmaplanas, Palma, SpainOasi Research Institute – IRCCS, Troina, ItalyClinica Union Medica del Norte, Santiago, Dominican RepublicMultifactorial and Systemic Diseases Research Area, Predictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, ItalyDivision of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USADivision of Respiratory Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Anesaki, Ichihara, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkAllergy & Severe Asthma Service, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UKDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USAAllergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, VenezuelaAllergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Clínica El Avila, Caracas, Venezuela
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liccioli G, Giovannini M, Caubet JC, Barni S, Sarti L, Parronchi P, Capone M, Tomei L, Mori F. Simplifying the drug provocation test in non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions to amoxicillin in children: The experience of a tertiary care allergy unit. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33:e13809. [PMID: 35754120 PMCID: PMC9328376 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mild non-immediate reactions (NIR) to beta-lactams (βLs) are the most common manifestation of adverse drug reactions in children, and the drug provocation test (DPT) remains the gold standard for diagnosis. However, there are still controversies about the protocol that should be used, especially regarding the administration of doses and the DPT length. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate a pediatric population with a history of mild NIR to amoxicillin (AMX) or to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMX/CL) who underwent a diagnostic workup including a DPT with the culprit drug, to understand if a graded DPT or, instead, a single full dose could be the most appropriate way of administration in clinical practice. METHODS The data of children were retrospectively analyzed for a 5-year period, with demographic and clinical characteristics collected. We reported the allergy workup and the results of the DPT performed with the administration of incremental doses and a prolonged DPT at home for a total of 5 days. RESULTS Three hundred fifty-four patients were included. Overall, 23/354 (6.5%) DPTs were positive: 11/23 patients showed a reaction after 2-8 h after the last dose on the 1st or 2nd day (1 reacted 30 min after the last dose), 1/23 reacted with urticaria 30 min after the first dose, 11/23 reacted at home on the 5th day of the DPT. CONCLUSION This paper indirectly suggests that a single therapeutic dose administered on the 1st day of a DPT could be safe in the diagnostic workup of mild NIR to AMX/CL. Moreover, this could be less time-consuming as patients would spend less time in the hospital, also considering the public health restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Liccioli
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Jean-Christoph Caubet
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Simona Barni
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Sarti
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Paola Parronchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Manuela Capone
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Leonardo Tomei
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Mori
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
|
8
|
Diagnosis of non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin in children by skin test and drug provocation tests: A retrospective case-series study. Allergol Int 2022; 71:131-136. [PMID: 34384710 DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2021.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin rash often occurs upon oral administration of amoxicillin in children, due to non-immediate hypersensitivity. However, information on delayed hypersensitivity to amoxicillin is scarce. Moreover, the appropriate diagnostic method and actual diagnostic rate of delayed hypersensitivity to amoxicillin among Japanese children are unclear. We conducted intradermal tests (IDTs) and drug provocation tests (DPTs) and retrospectively investigated the proportion of children with a definitive diagnosis of non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin. We then evaluated the characteristics of patients with a positive allergic workup. METHODS We enrolled children referred for suspected findings of mild or moderate non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin between August 2018 and March 2020. If the IDT in the delayed phase was negative, DPT with amoxicillin (60-90 mg/kg/day) was performed for 7 days. Non-immediate hypersensitivity to amoxicillin was defined when IDT or DPT was positive. We evaluated the potential of the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) to reveal hypersensitivity to amoxicillin. RESULTS This study enrolled 27 children. Fourteen children (52%) had hypersensitivity to amoxicillin, of whom 12 had positive IDTs and two had positive DPTs. No differences in age, sex, history of allergic disease, days from oral use to symptom onset, type of rash at symptom onset, generalized rash, and DLST results were observed between the hypersensitivity and non-hypersensitivity groups. CONCLUSIONS Examination should be performed for children with mild or moderate reactions because positive cases have no significant features and half of the suspected cases are negative.
Collapse
|
9
|
Prieto A, Muñoz C, Bogas G, Fernández‐Santamaría R, Palomares F, Mayorga C, Salas M, Doña I, Torres MJ. Single-dose prolonged drug provocation test, without previous skin testing, is safe for diagnosing children with mild non-immediate reactions to beta-lactams. Allergy 2021; 76:2544-2554. [PMID: 33650109 DOI: 10.1111/all.14800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mild non-immediate reactions (NIRs) to beta-lactams (BLs) are the most frequent manifestation of drug allergy in children. The diagnostic approach is complex as the utility of skin tests (STs) and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTTs) is controversial. Drug provocation test (DPT) is the gold standard, although no standardized protocols exist. We aimed to investigate the utility of DPT in a unique dose without previous STs, and LTTs in the diagnosis of NIRs to BLs in children. METHODS We prospectively evaluated children 0-14 years old referred to the Regional University Hospital of Málaga during 2017-2020 reporting NIRs to BLs. We performed a DPT with a unique dose followed by regular treatment at home. If positive, STs and LTTs were done after the reaction had disappeared. RESULTS We included 194 children, having 24 (12.4%) a positive DPT. The main culprit was AX (70.1%) followed by AX-clavulanic acid (CLV) (26.8%) and the main symptoms maculopapular exanthema (MPE) (49.5%) and delayed-urticaria (48.5%). A decrease (p = 0.013) in the interval of days between drug administration and onset of symptoms was observed in positive DPT compared with the original reaction (3.5 vs 6 days), with no differences in the overall percentage of MPE and delayed-appearing urticaria (p = 0.551). No severe reactions occurred during DPT. Moreover, STs were positive in 13.33% and LTTs in 52.9%. CONCLUSIONS Single-dose DPT without previous STs is a safe and useful way to assess NIRs to BLs in children. LTT has shown to be useful, confirming a T-cell mechanism involved in these reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Prieto
- Paediatrics Unit Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga Málaga Spain
| | - Candelaria Muñoz
- Paediatrics Unit Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga Málaga Spain
| | - Gádor Bogas
- Allergy Research Group Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
- Allergy UnitHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
| | | | - Francisca Palomares
- Allergy Research Group Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
| | - Cristobalina Mayorga
- Allergy Research Group Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
| | - Maria Salas
- Allergy Research Group Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
- Allergy UnitHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
| | - Inmaculada Doña
- Allergy Research Group Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
- Allergy UnitHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
| | - María José Torres
- Allergy Research Group Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
- Allergy UnitHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
- Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology‐BIONAND Málaga Spain
- Medicine Department Universidad de Málaga Málaga Spain
| |
Collapse
|