1
|
Debray R, Dickson CC, Webb SE, Archie EA, Tung J. Shared environments complicate the use of strain-resolved metagenomics to infer microbiome transmission. MICROBIOME 2025; 13:59. [PMID: 40022204 PMCID: PMC11869744 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-025-02051-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2025] [Indexed: 03/03/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In humans and other social animals, social partners have more similar microbiomes than expected by chance, suggesting that social contact transfers microorganisms. Yet, social microbiome transmission can be difficult to identify based on compositional data alone. To overcome this challenge, recent studies have used information about microbial strain sharing (i.e., the shared presence of highly similar microbial sequences) to infer transmission. However, the degree to which strain sharing is influenced by shared traits and environments among social partners, rather than transmission per se, is not well understood. RESULTS Here, we first use a fecal microbiota transplant dataset to show that strain sharing can recapitulate true transmission networks under ideal settings when donor-recipient pairs are unambiguous and recipients are sampled shortly after transmission. In contrast, in gut metagenomes from a wild baboon population, we find that demographic and environmental factors can override signals of strain sharing among social partners. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that strain-level analyses provide useful information about microbiome similarity, but other facets of study design, especially longitudinal sampling and careful consideration of host characteristics, are essential for inferring the underlying mechanisms of strain sharing and resolving true social transmission network. Video Abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena Debray
- Department of Primate Behavior and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
| | - Carly C Dickson
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Shasta E Webb
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Archie
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Jenny Tung
- Department of Primate Behavior and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Population Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Woodman JP, Gokcekus S, Beck KB, Green JP, Nussey DH, Firth JA. The ecology of ageing in wild societies: linking age structure and social behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2024; 379:20220464. [PMID: 39463244 PMCID: PMC11513650 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The age of individuals has consequences not only for their fitness and behaviour but also for the functioning of the groups they form. Because social behaviour often changes with age, population age structure is expected to shape the social organization, the social environments individuals experience and the operation of social processes within populations. Although research has explored changes in individual social behaviour with age, particularly in controlled settings, there is limited understanding of how age structure governs sociality in wild populations. Here, we synthesize previous research into age-related effects on social processes in natural populations, and discuss the links between age structure, sociality and ecology, specifically focusing on how population age structure might influence social structure and functioning. We highlight the potential for using empirical data from natural populations in combination with social network approaches to uncover pathways linking individual social ageing, population age structure and societal functioning. We discuss the broader implications of these insights for understanding the social impacts of anthropogenic effects on animal population demography and for building a deeper understanding of societal ageing in general.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Understanding age and society using natural populations'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe P. Woodman
- Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OxfordOX1 3SZ, UK
| | - Samin Gokcekus
- Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OxfordOX1 3SZ, UK
| | - Kristina B. Beck
- Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OxfordOX1 3SZ, UK
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jonathan P. Green
- Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OxfordOX1 3SZ, UK
| | - Dan H. Nussey
- Institute of Ecology & Evolution, The University of Edinburgh, EdinburghEH9 3JT, UK
| | - Josh A. Firth
- Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OxfordOX1 3SZ, UK
- School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Debray R, Dickson CC, Webb SE, Archie EA, Tung J. Shared environments complicate the use of strain-resolved metagenomics to infer microbiome transmission. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.07.18.604082. [PMID: 39071345 PMCID: PMC11275843 DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.18.604082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
In humans and other social animals, social partners have more similar microbiomes than expected by chance, suggesting that social contact transfers microorganisms. Yet, social microbiome transmission can be difficult to identify based on compositional data alone. To overcome this challenge, recent studies have used information about microbial strain sharing (i.e., the shared presence of highly similar microbial sequences) to infer transmission. However, the degree to which strain sharing is influenced by shared traits and environments among social partners, rather than transmission per se, is not well understood. Here, we first use a fecal microbiota transplant dataset to show that strain sharing can recapitulate true transmission networks under ideal settings when donor-recipient pairs are unambiguous and recipients are sampled shortly after transmission. In contrast, in gut metagenomes from a wild baboon population, we find that demographic and environmental factors can override signals of strain sharing among social partners. We conclude that strain-level analyses provide useful information about microbiome similarity, but other facets of study design, especially longitudinal sampling and careful consideration of host characteristics, are essential for inferring the underlying mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena Debray
- Department of Primate Behavior and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
| | - Carly C Dickson
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
| | - Shasta E Webb
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Archie
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
| | - Jenny Tung
- Department of Primate Behavior and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Population Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wild S, Alarcón-Nieto G, Aplin LM. The ontogeny of social networks in wild great tits ( Parus major). Behav Ecol 2024; 35:arae011. [PMID: 38495730 PMCID: PMC10941318 DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arae011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Sociality impacts many biological processes and can be tightly linked to an individual's fitness. To maximize the advantages of group living, many social animals prefer to associate with individuals that provide the most benefits, such as kin, familiar individuals, or those of similar phenotypes. Such social strategies are not necessarily stable over time but can vary with changing selection pressures. In particular, young individuals transitioning to independence should continuously adjust their social behavior in light of developmental changes. However, social strategies exhibited during adolescence in animals are understudied, and the factors underlying social network formation during ontogeny remain elusive. Here, we tracked associations of wild great tits (Parus major) during the transition to independence and across their first year of life. Both spatial and social factors predicted dyadic associations. During the transition to independence in spring, fledglings initially preferred to associate with siblings and peers over non-parent adults. We found no evidence for preferred associations among juveniles of similar age or fledge weight during that time but weak evidence for some potential inheritance of the parental social network. By autumn, after juveniles had reached full independence, they exhibited social strategies similar to those of adults by establishing stable social ties based on familiarity that persisted through winter into the next spring. Overall, this research demonstrates dynamic changes in social networks during ontogeny in a species with a fast life history and limited parental care, which likely reflect changes in selective pressures. It further highlights the importance of long-term social bonds based on familiarity in this species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Wild
- Cognitive and Cultural Ecology Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Am Obstberg 1, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany
- Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78464 Konstanz, Germany
- Department of Environmental Science & Policy, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA-95616, USA
| | - Gustavo Alarcón-Nieto
- Cognitive and Cultural Ecology Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Am Obstberg 1, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany
- Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Am Obstberg 1, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany
- International Max Planck Research School for Quantitative Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution, Am Obstberg 1, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany
- Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78464 Konstanz, Germany
| | - Lucy M Aplin
- Cognitive and Cultural Ecology Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Am Obstberg 1, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, 46 Sullivan’s Creek Road, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Franks VR, Thorogood R, Brekke P. Parental breeding decisions and genetic quality predict social structure of independent offspring. Mol Ecol 2023; 32:4898-4910. [PMID: 37395642 DOI: 10.1111/mec.17066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Across the animal kingdom, newly independent juveniles form social associations that influence later fitness, mate choice and gene flow, but little is known about the ontogeny of social environments, particularly in wild populations. Here we test whether associations among young animals form randomly or are influenced by environmental or genetic conditions established by parents. Parents' decisions determine natal birth sites, which could affect who independent young initially encounter; secondly, mate choice determines genetic condition (e.g. inbreeding) of young and the parental care they receive, which can affect sociability. However, genetic and environmental factors are confounded unless related offspring experience different natal environments. Therefore, we used a long-term genetic pedigree, breeding records and social network data from three cohorts of a songbird with high extra-pair paternity (hihi, Notiomystis cincta) to disentangle (1) how nest location and relatedness contribute to association structure once juveniles disperse away from birth sites, and (2) if juvenile and/or parental inbreeding predicts individual sociability. We detected positive spatial autocorrelation: hihi that fledged closer by were more likely to associate even after dispersing, irrespective of genetic relatedness. Juvenile inbreeding did not predict sociability, but those raised by more inbred fathers formed more, stronger, associations, which did not depend on whether that male was the genetic parent or not. These results suggest that the natal environment created by parents, rather than focal genetic condition, establishes the foundation for social associations. Overall, we highlight how social inheritance may play an important role in population dynamics and evolutionary potential in wild animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria R Franks
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Chester, Chester, UK
| | - Rose Thorogood
- Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Patricia Brekke
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Loader A, Rose P. Age-Related Change in the Association Choices of Two Species of Juvenile Flamingos. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:2623. [PMID: 37627414 PMCID: PMC10451657 DOI: 10.3390/ani13162623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Flamingos are colonial species commonly kept in zoos, well known for their bright plumage and elaborate courtship displays. This project aimed to determine the differences in flock position and association preferences of juvenile Greater Flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) and Caribbean Flamingos (P. ruber) housed in the same zoological collection. Little research has been conducted on the association preferences of juvenile flamingos, especially in captive flocks, and therefore this study collected data using photographs taken throughout 2014 and 2015 to further understand association patterns. Data were collected on the age category of each juvenile flamingo observed, the age of their nearest neighbour and their position within the flock, and the location within an enclosure zone at different times of the day. The results showed that Greater Flamingo juveniles mainly associated with individuals of their own age and were most likely positioned at the periphery of their flock significantly more of the time until approximately 24 months of age. Sub-adult Greater Flamingos spent significantly more time associating with adult flamingos at the centre of the flock. In contrast, data collected on Caribbean Flamingos indicated that juveniles did not segregate themselves from the adults as distinctively. Birds aged 13-24 months were observed significantly more at the centre of the flock and had more associations with adult flamingos, in a similar manner to that observed in Greater Flamingos. Due to population management needs, juvenile Caribbean Flamingos were removed from the flock at the start of 2015 and this may have influenced the association and location preferences of the remaining young flamingos. In conclusion, these results indicated that captive juvenile flamingos were often seen away from adult birds and that sub-adult flamingos returned to the heart of their natal flock to associate significantly more with other adult individuals, potentially preparing for mate selection and breeding. Captive enclosure should therefore be spacious enough to enable young flamingos to remove themselves from adult birds so that behavioural development can be unaffected by artificially high rates of aggression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbie Loader
- University Centre Sparsholt, Sparsholt College Hampshire, Sparsholt, Winchester SO21 2NF, UK;
- Cotswold Wildlife Park, Bradwell Grove, Burford OX18 4JP, UK
| | - Paul Rose
- Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Psychology, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK
- WWT Slimbridge Wetland Centre, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kohn GM, Nugent MR, Dail X. Juvenile Gouldian finches (
Erythrura gouldiae
) form sibling subgroups during social integration. Dev Psychobiol 2022; 64:e22262. [DOI: 10.1002/dev.22262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory M. Kohn
- Department of Psychology University of North Florida Jacksonville Florida USA
- Department of Wildlife Wellness Jacksonville Zoo and Gardens Jacksonville Florida USA
| | - M. Ryan Nugent
- Department of Wildlife Wellness Jacksonville Zoo and Gardens Jacksonville Florida USA
| | - Xzavier Dail
- Department of Wildlife Wellness Jacksonville Zoo and Gardens Jacksonville Florida USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pero EM, Chitwood MC, Hildreth AM, Berkman LK, Keller BJ, Sumners JA, Hansen LP, Isabelle JL, Eggert LS, Titus CL, Millspaugh JJ. Acclimation of elk mating system following restoration to the Missouri Ozarks, U.S.A. Restor Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M. Pero
- Wildlife Biology Program University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive Missoula MT 59812 USA
| | - M. Colter Chitwood
- Natural Resource Ecology & Management Oklahoma State University, 008C Agriculture Hall Stillwater OK 74078 USA
| | - Aaron M. Hildreth
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd. Columbia MO 65201 USA
| | - Leah K. Berkman
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd. Columbia MO 65201 USA
| | - Barbara J. Keller
- Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 500 Lafayette Rd. St. Paul MN 55155 USA
| | - Jason A. Sumners
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 2901 W Truman Blvd Jefferson City MO 65102 USA
| | - Lonnie P. Hansen
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd. Columbia MO 65201 USA
| | - Jason L. Isabelle
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd. Columbia MO 65201 USA
| | - Lori S. Eggert
- Biological Sciences University of Missouri Columbia MO 65211 USA
| | - Chelsea L. Titus
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd. Columbia MO 65201 USA
| | - Joshua J. Millspaugh
- Wildlife Biology Program University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive Missoula MT 59812 USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Franks VR, Ewen JG, McCready M, Thorogood R. Foraging behaviour alters with social environment in a juvenile songbird. Proc Biol Sci 2020; 287:20201878. [PMID: 33234077 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Early independence from parents is a critical period where social information acquired vertically may become outdated, or conflict with new information. However, across natural populations, it is unclear if newly independent young persist in using information from parents, or if group-level effects of conformity override previous behaviours. Here, we test if wild juvenile hihi (Notiomystis cincta, a New Zealand passerine) retain a foraging behaviour from parents, or if they change in response to the behaviour of peers. We provided feeding stations to parents during chick-rearing to seed alternative access routes, and then tracked their offspring's behaviour. Once independent, juveniles formed mixed-treatment social groups, where they did not retain preferences from their time with parents. Instead, juvenile groups converged over time to use one access route- per group, and juveniles that moved between groups switched to copy the locally favoured option. Juvenile hihi did not copy specific individuals, even if they were more familiar with the preceding bird. Our study shows that early social experiences with parents affect initial foraging decisions, but social environments encountered later on can update transmission of arbitrary behaviours. This suggests that conformity may be widespread in animal groups, with potential cultural, ecological and evolutionary consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria R Franks
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.,Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK
| | - John G Ewen
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK
| | - Mhairi McCready
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.,Hihi Conservation Charitable Trust, Rotorua, New Zealand
| | - Rose Thorogood
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.,Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.,Research program in Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland
| |
Collapse
|