Intérêt des lavages abdominaux pour la prévention de l’ensemencement néoplasique péritonéal

Water lavage as an adjunct to cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC)

BACKGROUND

Water lavage (WL) during gastrointestinal cancer surgery has osmotically mediated lytic effects on tumor cells. We investigated the safety and efficacy of WL with CRS-HIPEC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review, 1/2003-7/2014, of a single institution experience with CRS-HIPEC comparing patients who had WL (WL+) to those who did not (WL-).

RESULTS

Of 157 CRS-HIPECs, 16 (10.2%) were WL+. WL+ had more PCI scores >20 compared to WL- (56.3% vs 19.4%, respectively, p = 0.003); however, the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) was similar. There were no differences in hospital length of stay or post-operative complications. The average POD 1 sodium (Na) level was statistically lower in the WL+ group (133.6 ± 2.5 vs 135.5 ± 3.2 mEq/L, p = 0.023); however, the average Na at discharge for each group was 140 mEq/L. There were no differences in 3-year OS (3WL+:0.63 vs WL-:0.68, p = 0.97) or RFS (WL+:0.32 vs WL-:0.39, p = 0.47). A subset analysis for patients with PCI >20 showed no difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

WL offers a low cost, safe and theoretically efficacious method of tumor cell lysis for peritoneal malignancy.

[Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour: a review]

Transurethral resection of bladder tumour is a common procedure (10,711 new cases of bladder tumour diagnosed in France in 2000), associated with a certain morbidity. Intra- or extraperitoneal perforation of the bladder wall is a possible complication. The diagnosis is generally established intraoperatively and cystography can be performed in the operating room to demonstrate the diameter of the perforation. Most cases of extraperitoneal perforation can be treated conservatively by simple bladder drainage. Intraperitoneal perforations may require surgical repair Laparoscopy is currently tending to replace open surgery for this repair. One of the risks of perforation is also tumour seeding outside of the bladder However metastases related to perforation appear to be rare and occur rapidly requiring close surveillance.

Cœlioscopie et cancer en gynécologie : le point en 2005

All the surgical procedures, which may be required to treat a gynecologic cancer, can be performed endoscopically. However prospective randomized studies required to confirm the oncologic efficacy of the technique are still lacking in gynecology, whereas such studies are available in digestive surgery. Animal studies suggested that the risk of tumor dissemination in non traumatized peritoneum is higher after a pneumoperitoneum than after a laparotomy. Experimental studies also emphasized two points: the surgeon and the surgical technique are essential, all the parameters of the pneumoperitoneum may influence the postoperative dissemination. Changing these parameters we may, in the future, be able to create a peritoneal environment adapted to oncologic patients in order to prevent or to decrease the risks of peritoneal dissemination and/or of postoperative tumor growth. Until the results of prospective randomized studies become available, the preoperative selection of the patients and the surgical technique should be very strict. In patients with endometrial cancer, the laparoscopic approach should be reserved to clinical stage I disease, if the vaginal extraction is anticipated to be easy accounting for the volume of the uterus and the local conditions. In cervical cancer, the laparoscopic approach should be reserved to patients with favorable prognostic factors: stage IB of less than 2 cm in diameter. Laparoscopy is the gold standard for the surgical diagnosis of adnexal masses. But the puncture should be avoided whenever possible. The surgical treatment of invasive ovarian cancer should be performed by laparotomy whatever the stage. In contrast restaging of an early ovarian cancer initially managed as a benign mass, is a good indication of the laparoscopic approach. The laparoscopic management of low malignant potential tumors should include a complete staging of the peritoneum. Knowledge of the principles of endoscopy and of oncologic surgery is required. Teaching and diffusion of endoscopic oncological techniques are among the major challenges of gynecologic surgery within the next few years.

DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF BLADDER PERFORATION DURING TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF SUPERFICIAL BLADDER TUMORS PREDISPOSE TO EXTRAVESICAL TUMOR RECURRENCE?

PURPOSE

We evaluated the impact of a bladder perforation during transurethral resection of superficial bladder tumor on extravesical tumor recurrence and patient prognosis. We also defined potential risk factors for extravesical recurrence prospectively giving emphasis to the management of the perforation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 3,410 patients were reviewed. Parameters recorded included patient age and sex, tumor stage, grade, number, size and location at the time of perforation, the type of bladder perforation (extraperitoneal vs intraperitoneal) and the way the perforation was managed (open surgical repair vs conservative treatment). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for extravesical recurrence. Cox regression analysis was used to compare cancer specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 34 cases of bladder perforation were recorded, 4 patients were treated with open surgery and 30 treated conservatively. The 4 patients who underwent open surgery presented with extravesical recurrence after a mean followup of 7.5 months. The remaining 30 patients had no evidence of extravesical recurrence after a mean followup of 60 months (p <0.001). Of the patients with extravesical relapse 3 died of disease. The surgical management of bladder perforation was the best predictor of extravesical recurrence (p <0.001, r = 1.13), followed by an intraperitoneal localization of the perforation (p =0.0003, r = 0.67) and tumor size (p =0.01, r = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical repair of a bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumor increases the risk of extravesical tumor cell recurrence and negatively affects patient prognosis.