Does plasma IGF-BP3 measurement contribute to the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children?

A Bayesian Approach to Diagnose Growth Hormone Deficiency in Children: Insulin-Like Growth Factor Type 1 Is Valuable for Screening and IGF-Binding Protein Type 3 for Confirmation

BACKGROUND

The utility of insulin-like growth factor type 1 (IGF-1) is well established in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD), whereas IGF-binding protein type 3 (IGFBP-3) has a more controversial role. Most studies evaluated the value of these peptides by assessing their sensitivity and specificity but not considering the low prevalence of GHD among short children (<2%).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of basal IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 values in the GHD diagnosis process with a Bayesian approach, based on pre- and post-test probability.

METHODS

We determined ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 obtained from patients with GHD (n = 48) and GH-sufficient children (n = 175). The data were also analyzed by classifying the children into early childhood and late childhood (girls and boys younger and older than 8 and 9 years, respectively).

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve of IGF-1-SDS (standard deviation score) was greater than that of IGFBP-3-SDS (AUC 0.886 and 0.786, respectively, p = 0.001). In early childhood, the AUC of IGFBP-3-SDS was significantly improved (0.866) and similar to IGF-1-SDS (0.898). IGF-1-SDS, in comparison to IGFBP-3-SDS, had a greater sensitivity (92 vs. 45.8%, respectively), lower specificity (69 vs. 93.8%, respectively), and lower positive predictive value (5.7 vs. 13.1%, respectively), with similar negative predictive values.

CONCLUSION

IGF-1-SDS is a useful screening tool in the diagnosis of GHD. Although IGFBP-3-SDS lacks sensitivity, its high specificity supports the role to confirm GHD in short children, especially in early childhood. This strategy could simplify and reduce the necessity of a second laborious and expensive GH stimulation test to confirm the diagnosis of GHD.

A Proposal for the Interpretation of Serum IGF-I Concentration as Part of Laboratory Screening in Children with Growth Failure

The serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentration is commonly used as a screening tool for growth hormone deficiency (GHD), but there is no consensus on the cut-off limit of IGF-I standard deviation score (SDS) to perform GH stimulation tests for confirmation or exclusion of GHD. We argue that the cut-off limit is dependent on the clinical pre-test likelihood of GHD and propose a diagnostic strategy in which the cut-off limit varies between zero to -2 SDS.

Towards a Rational and Efficient Diagnostic Approach in Children Referred for Growth Failure to the General Paediatrician

Based on a recent Dutch national guideline, we propose a structured stepwise diagnostic approach for children with growth failure (short stature and/or growth faltering), aiming at high sensitivity for pathologic causes at acceptable specificity. The first step is a detailed clinical assessment, aiming at obtaining relevant clinical clues from the medical history (including family history), physical examination (emphasising head circumference, body proportions and dysmorphic features) and assessment of the growth curve. The second step consists of screening: a radiograph of the hand and wrist (for bone age and assessment of anatomical abnormalities suggestive for a skeletal dysplasia) and laboratory tests aiming at detecting disorders that can present as isolated short stature (anaemia, growth hormone deficiency, hypothyroidism, coeliac disease, renal failure, metabolic bone diseases, renal tubular acidosis, inflammatory bowel disease, Turner syndrome [TS]). We advise molecular array analysis rather than conventional karyotyping for short girls because this detects not only TS but also copy number variants and uniparental isodisomy, increasing diagnostic yield at a lower cost. Third, in case of diagnostic clues for primary growth disorders, further specific testing for candidate genes or a hypothesis-free approach is indicated; suspicion of a secondary growth disorder warrants adequate further targeted testing.

Baseline IGFBP - 3 as the Key Element to Predict Growth Response to Growth Hormone and IGF - 1 Therapy in Subjects with Non - GH Deficient Short Stature and IGF - 1 Deficiency

BACKGROUND

Short stature in children represents a heterogeneous group with different etiologies. Primary Insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF - 1) deficiency in short stature can present with normal or elevated growth hormone (GH) production. Currently there is no model that can reliably predict response to recombinant (r)GH therapy and/or rIGF - 1 therapy in children with non - GH deficient short stature.

HYPOTHESIS

Baseline Insulin like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP - 3) along with ∆ IGF - 1 in the first 3 months of GH therapy level can be a marker of growth response to the rGH and/or rIGF - 1 therapy in children with non - growth hormone deficiency short stature.

OBJECTIVES

To study the relationship between baseline IGFBP - 3 and IGF - 1 levels and the response to rGH and rIGF - 1 therapy in children with short stature, normal GH secretion and low IGF - 1 SDS.

METHODS

43 children, age 9.07 ± 2.75 years with height -2.72 ± 0.7 SD and baseline IGF - 1 of -2.76 ± 0.58 SD, who passed the growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulation test were included in a retrospective chart review. They were treated with rGH therapy with a mean dose of 0.46 ± 0.1 mg/kg/week. Growth velocity (GV), IGF - 1 and IGFBP - 3 levels were done at 3 and 6 months of therapy. Subjects with poor response to rGH after 6 months of therapy were switched to rIGF - 1 therapy at 0.24 mg/kg/day for the next 6 months. Subjects were divided according to their growth rate into responders to rGH (N = 23); non - responders to rGH, responders to rIGF - 1 (N = 14) and non - responders to rGH and rIGF-1 (N = 6).

RESULTS

There was no correlation between GV and peak GH level at GHRH test. Growth velocity positively correlated with ΔIGF - 1 SD among subjects treated with rGH therapy. Height SD positively correlated with IGFBP - 3 SD. Baseline IGFBP - 3 also inversely correlated with GH peak during GHRH test.

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects with short stature and low IGF - 1 level, baseline IGFBP - 3 levels can predict the growth response to rGH and/or rIGF - 1 therapy.

Diagnostic value of serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in growth hormone deficiency: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) are conventionally considered available for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD), but the results about their diagnostic values are inconsistent among some recent epidemiological studies. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic values of serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 for GHD by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies on serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 used in GHD diagnosis were systematically searched from databases PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI (up to December 2013). Characteristics of the studies and data were independently collected according to the inclusion criteria by two authors. The quality of included studies was assessed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS). Both sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in GHD diagnosis were estimated on statistical software Meta-DiSc and Stata. A total of 12 studies were included for the final analysis. IGF-1 had SEN of 0.66, SPE of 0.69, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 2.48, negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0.51, area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) of 0.78, and Q* value of 0.72. Serum IGFBP-3 had SEN of 0.50, SPE of 0.79, PLR of 2.69, NLR of 0.64, area under SROC of 0.80, and Q* value of 0.73.

CONCLUSION

Serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 are useful for the diagnosis of GHD and can be utilized as auxiliary diagnosis indexes for provocative test.