Diagnostic difficulties in cases of papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential, urothelial proliferation of uncertain malignant potential, urothelial dysplasia and urothelial papilloma: A review of current literature

Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential with osseous metaplasia in a 19-year-old chronic smoker: A case report with review of literature

Urothelial tumors characteristically occur in elderly persons, more commonly in males with typical complaints of hematuria. Although few studies attempted to describe clinic-pathological features of urothelial malignancies in young patients, due to heterogeneity in the inclusion of age groups under "young patients" no reliable conclusions can be derived. Herein, we are describing an interesting case of papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential with osseous metaplasia in a 19-year-old chronic smoker young patient presented with chief complaints of abdominal pain with a review of the literature.

Precursors of urinary bladder cancer: molecular alterations and biomarkers

Clinical surveillance and follow-up of patients diagnosed with or at risk for urinary bladder cancers represent long-term, invasive, and costly processes for which supplemental biomarker information could help provide objective, personalized risk assessment. In particular, there are several precursors and possible precursors to urinary bladder cancer for which clinical behavior is heterogenous and interobserver variability in histopathologic diagnosis make it difficult to standardize management. This review seeks to highlight these precursor lesions from a diagnostic perspective (including flat urothelial lesions, papillary urothelial lesions, squamous lesions, and glandular lesions) and qualify known multiomic biomarkers that may help explain their behavior, predict patient risk, and acknowledge the nuance inherent to the question of whether these lesions are "benign" or "preneoplastic."

Multiparametric Classification of Non-Muscle Invasive Papillary Urothelial Neoplasms: Combining Morphological, Phenotypical, and Molecular Features for Improved Risk Stratification

Diagnosis and grading of non-invasive papillary urothelial tumors according to the current WHO classification poses some challenges for pathologists. The diagnostic reproducibility of separating low-grade and high-grade lesions is low, which impacts their clinical management. Whereas papillary urothelial neoplasms with low malignant potential (PUN-LMP) and low-grade papillary non-invasive carcinoma (LG-PUC) are comparable and show frequent local recurrence but rarely metastasize, high-grade papillary non-invasive carcinoma (HG-PUC) has a poor prognosis. The main objective of this work is to develop a multiparametric classification to unambiguously distinguish low-grade and high-grade tumors, considering immunohistochemical stains for p53, FGFR3, CK20, MIB-1, p16, p21 and p-HH3, and pathogenic mutations in TP53, FGFR3, TP53, ERCC2, PIK3CA, PTEN and STAG2. We reviewed and analyzed the clinical and histological data of 45 patients with a consensus diagnosis of PUN-LMP (n = 8), non-invasive LG-PUC (n = 23), and HG-PUC (n = 14). The proliferation index and mitotic count assessed with MIB-1 and P-HH3 staining, respectively correlated with grading and clinical behavior. Targeted sequencing confirmed frequent FGFR3 mutations in non-invasive papillary tumors and identified mutations in TP53 as high-risk. Cluster analysis of the different immunohistochemical and molecular parameters allowed a clear separation in two different clusters: cluster 1 corresponding to PUN-LMP and LG-PUC (low MIB-1 and mitotic count/FGFR3 and STAG2 mutations) and cluster 2, HG-PUC (high MIB-1 and mitosis count/CK20 +++ expression, FGFR3 WT and TP53 mutation). Further analysis is required to validate and analyze the reproducibility of these clusters and their biological and clinical implication.

Urothelial Papilloma of the Urinary Bladder: A Case Report and Literature Review of a Rare Entity

Urothelial papilloma is a rare benign neoplasm composed of a delicate fibrovascular core covered by normal urothelium. In this report, we present a case of an incidentally detected endovesical papillary growth in ultrasound scan (USS) during a routine check-up, suggestive of bladder tumor which was also suggested by CT urography. The tumor was initially managed with transurethral resection and immediate intravesical instillation of mitomycine C 40 mg. The histopathologic assessment of the specimen concluded that the growth was “urothelial papilloma with no atypia or malignancy.” Although papilloma is unequivocally benign, it can recur; recurrences can be multiple and can occur years after the initial diagnosis occasionally with progression to carcinoma, hence long-term surveillance is essential. Our case was followed up for a year with no signs of recurrence or progression and long-term surveillance will be done annually.

Educational Case: Urothelial Carcinoma: An Overview of Pathologic Diagnosis

The following fictional case is intended as a learning tool within the Pathology Competencies for Medical Education (PCME), a set of national standards for teaching pathology. These are divided into three basic competencies: Disease Mechanisms and Processes, Organ System Pathology, and Diagnostic Medicine and Therapeutic Pathology. For additional information, and a full list of learning objectives for all three competencies, seehttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2374289517715040.¹

Reappraisal of the papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP)

Although the papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP) diagnostic category was retained in the updated 2016 World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of tumours of the urinary system, there still exists a great deal of controversy regarding the biological behaviour of these tumours. We review PUNLMP tumours and histological grading with an emphasis on the histomorphological, genetic and clinical similarities between PUNLMP and low-grade non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma. A literature search using PubMed was performed. All relevant literature concerning PUNLMP and the grading of urothelial tumours was reviewed. PUNLMPs cannot be reliably distinguished from low-grade non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas based on the histomorphological criteria outlined in the WHO 2004/2016 classification system. PUNLMPs and low-grade non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas are not only morphologically similar, but also share similar molecular genetic alterations and a similar risk of recurrence and progression. In addition, there are no consensus recommendations for a different method of treatment and follow-up for these two tumour types. Attempting to distinguish PUNLMP from low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma adds an unnecessary level of complexity to the grading and classification of urothelial tumours. We feel that PUNLMP terminology should be abandoned and that all such tumours should be classified as low-grade carcinomas until more objective determinants of clinical outcome can be established.

Primary papilloma of the proximal ureter in a 13-year old boy: A rare case

•

Primary papilloma of the ureteral proximal end is extremely rare.

•

Benign tumors of the ureter are much less frequent than malignant ones.

•

The main clinical signs of benign ureteral tumor are hematuria, pain and hydronephrosis.

•

The exact diagnosis can be established with histologic study.

•

The best noninvasive treatment of benign ureteral mass lesion is a segmental resection of ureter.

Introduction

Approximately 1 percent of the tumors observed in the upper urinary tract are primary tumors of the ureter. The exact diagnosis is done by a histologic study. Most cases need surgery, which is done by complete resection of the tumoral segment of the ureter.

Presentation of case

This study presents a 13-year-old boy who referred to Ali Asghar pediatric hospital with complaints of right flank pain and hematuria for four months. The ultrasonography revealed moderate-grade hydronephrosis. The retrograde urography confirmed a 1.5 cm lesion with filling defects in the proximal segment of the right ureter. The abdominal CT-scan confirmed a 1.5 cm filling defect lesion with a smooth margin in the right proximal ureter adjacent to the ureteropelvic orifice. On cystoscopy, a sessile mass developed in the proximal portion of right ureter and providing pronounced dilation of the ureter and ipsilateral hydronephrosis. Histopathology examination revealed a benign neoplasm composed of a delicate fibrovascular core covered by normal-appearing urothelium. The patient underwent a successful proximal segment resection of the ureter by surgery.

Discussion

Benign tumors of the ureter are much less frequent than malignant ones. Mostly, they involve the lower third of the ureter. Pain, hematuria, and hydronephrosis are the most clinical signs. The final diagnosis can be established with the histologic examination. The choice treatment in is segmental ureterectomy.

Conclusion

Primary ureteral papilloma is extremely rare in the child. The histopathology study is essential for ruling out malignancy. The recurrence and progression of ureteral papilloma are controversial.

Intrarenal urothelial cancers confused as infiltrative renal masses: Report of 22 cases and literature review

Distinguishing infiltrative renal masses (IRMs) from intrarenal urothelial cancers (IUCs) is critically important, but may be challenging for any radiologist or urologist. The present study aimed to summarize the clinical, imaging and pathological characteristics of IRM, which were postoperatively confirmed as IUC. The analysis was performed using the records of 22 patients who were preoperatively diagnosed with IRM but the results of percutaneous biopsies or postoperative pathological analyses led to diagnoses of urothelial cancers (UCs) from January 2011 to December 2017. The demographic data, computed tomography (CT) imaging features and pathological characteristics were evaluated. The present study also reviewed the literature concerning the IRM and IUC. The mean age of patients was 62 years and 86.4% of them were >55 years. The sex and tumor side distributions were equal. Hematuria and/or flank pain were observed in 86.4% of patients. All patients exhibited endophytic solid renal masses with unclear tumor boundaries on CT images. The kidneys of 81.8% of patients maintained their normal shape while mild alternations were observed in 18.2% of cases. A total of 81.8% of patients maintained the reniform shape and 18.2% exhibited mild contour change. Of all patients, all tumors exhibited less or equal attenuation on unenhanced CT images and they were mildlyimproved on enhanced CT. A total of 6 cases were confirmed by biopsy, when patients underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy instead of radical nephrectomy. The remaining 16 patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy but the postoperative pathological diagnoses revealed the presence of UCs. All postoperatively confirmed cancers were stages T3 and T4 (62.5 and 37.5%, respectively). UCs should be suspected in middle aged or elderly middle-elderly patients presenting renal masses with endophytic solid unclear tumor boundary on unenhanced and slightly enhanced CT images, accompanied with hematuria and/or flank pain. Preoperative biopsy is preferred for complicated cases.