Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of warming local anesthetics on injection pain

Clinical Evaluation of the Temperature Dependence of Subcutaneous Injection Experience in Healthy Volunteers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical effect of the warming step for subcutaneous (SC) injection on injection site pain (ISP).

METHODS

A single center, randomized, partially blinded, crossover study in 44 healthy participants was conducted. Participants self-injected with autoinjectors (1 mL) with either high pain (citrate/sodium chloride (NaCl)) or low pain (mannitol) formulations at refrigerated temperature or warmed to room temperature (RT) according to the instructions for use (IFU). The ISP was recorded using visual analog scale (VAS) and injection site reactions (ISRs) were captured using severity scores.

RESULTS

The average VAS scores were clinically different between high pain and low pain formulation but not affected by the warming step. While the average VAS was not affected by injectate temperature, some individual participants reported bidirectional VAS responses to injectate temperature. A post injection questionnaire showed that most participants were not bothered by the cold sensation of the injected solution. The clinical results are consistent with modeling that indicates rapid temperature equilibration of subcutaneously injected solutions.

CONCLUSION

Formulation composition was the dominating factor contributing to ISP as compared to solution temperature due to transient thermal equilibrium of the injected solution in SC tissue. While injection temperature may be a lever for improving the injection experience for some patients, the warming step is unlikely to reduce ISP for most patients. Although this study was conducted with 1 mL injection of two representative formulations, this finding of lack of correlation between ISP and solution temperature is likely extrapolatable to most small volume (e.g., ≤ 2 mL) injections of subcutaneous formulations.

Anticipation, perception, and recollection of acute pain from local anesthesia injection prior to Mohs surgery

Subcutaneous local anesthetic injection is universally used in dermatologic surgery to achieve anesthesia. While multiple factors have been identified as influential in chronic pain, little is known about factors that contribute to acute pain. The purpose of this article is to elucidate trends and factors that contribute to the perception of acute pain. Patients scheduled to undergo Mohs surgery at our institution were surveyed regarding their anticipated, perceived, and recalled pain from local anesthetic injection prior to ("Before"), during ("During"), immediately after ("After"), and on the evening ("Evening") of their procedure. Demographic data, relevant past medical history (PMH) and medication use, tobacco use, and prior history of Mohs surgery were collected from subsequent chart review. On average, pain intensities were significantly different between all four time points except between After and Evening. Patients with relevant PMH, patients who were having Mohs surgery on the head and neck, patients with no history of prior Mohs surgery, and never-smokers anticipated their pain to be greater than it actually was. Subsets of patients who anticipated their local anesthetic injection to be more painful than it actually was may benefit from increased anticipatory guidance and preoperative education.

Efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy on pain perception reduction associated with dental anesthetic infiltration injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dental anesthetic injections, a common source of patient discomfort, often deter individuals from seeking dental care. Recently, there has been a growing focus on photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) and its potential role in pain reduction. This systematic review explored the efficacy of PBMT in alleviating pain associated with dental anesthetic infiltration injections. A systematic literature search of different databases was performed up to December, 2023 using specific search strategy to find eligible studies that assessed the impact of PBMT on pain during local anesthesia injections. Data extraction was done based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. A total of 13 studies, involving 972 patients were included. The studies employed various PBMT parameters, including wavelengths, and energy densities. Meta-analyses revealed a significant reduction in pain with PBMT compared to controls (MD = -0.90, 95% CI: -1.36 to -0.44, and p = 0.0001), with notable heterogeneity (I2 = 91.79%). Stratified analyses by age demonstrated consistent pain reduction in both adults (MD = -0.59, 95% CI: -1.11 to -0.08, and p < 0.0001) and children (MD = -0.59, 95% CI: -1.11 to -0.08, and p = 0.025). In conclusion, it seems that PBMT using infrared diode lasers can effectively reduce injection pain in both pediatric and adult populations. Further research should focus on optimizing PBMT parameters for enhanced pain management during dental procedures.

[Evaluation of local anesthesia with buffered Xylocaine in pleural procedures: The DOULAPLUX study]

INTRODUCTION

Pleural procedures are painful interventions. While there exist recommendations aimed at preventing pain induced by local anesthesia, they have never been evaluated with regard to the thoracic wall. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of buffered lidocaine local anesthesia in pleural procedures.

METHODS

Descriptive, monocentric, prospective study, including all initial pleural procedures performed in our unit. Pain was assessed 20minutes after the procedure using the VAS (Visual Analog Scale) or the NRS (Numerical Rating Scale).

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-one patients were included. The procedures included thoracocentesis (58%), pleural or pulmonary biopsy (28%), or drainage (14%). Average pain intensity was 0.6 on a scale of 10. Over two thirds (68%) of patients had a VAS or NRS score of 0, and 91%≤2. Infectious pleuritis, pneumothorax, and drainage were associated with more pain. The pain levels were acceptable (average VAS/NRS scores of 1.3, 1.8, 1.7 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Buffered lidocaine local anesthesia provides excellent pain control for pleural procedures, regardless of their nature. Recommendations regarding local anesthesia apply to the thoracic wall, and their dissemination is essential to reduction of the pain induced by pleural procedures.

Safe and Effective Augmentation Mastopexy with Tumescent Local Anesthesia: A Decade of Experience

Background: Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) is widely used in esthetic surgery due to its ability to reduce complications, eliminate the need for general anesthesia, provide effective pain control, and shorten hospitalization times. Methods: This study evaluates the use of TLA in 80 patients who underwent augmentation mastopexy between 2010 and 2022. A tumescent solution containing 500 mg lidocaine, 672 mg sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mg epinephrine in 1000 mL of saline was infiltrated, with an average of 300 mL per breast. The surgical technique involved creating a subpectoral pocket for textured round implants (250-400 cc), followed by careful hemostasis. Results: No patients required conversion to general anesthesia, and there were no signs of toxicity or major complications. Minor complications included wound dehiscence (6.2%), hematoma (2.5%), and capsular contracture (2.5%). Pain management satisfaction at 3 months post-surgery was rated as "outstanding" by 12.5% of patients, "excellent" by 67.5%, and "good" by 20%. The longest follow-up was 6 years, with no implant ruptures except one (1.2%). Conclusions: While the study did not include a control group or statistical analysis, the findings suggest that TLA is a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia for augmentation mastopexy, providing excellent pain control and a low rate of complications.

Strategies to minimize procedure-related pain and anxiety: lessons from pediatric dermatology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent studies have suggested that prolonged or repeated episodes of general anesthesia early in childhood may adversely affect neurodevelopment. This, combined with rising healthcare costs and decreasing access, has sparked interest in performing pediatric procedures in the office setting when possible. It is essential to address the physical and psychological discomfort that often accompany this experience, particularly in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Healthcare providers performing procedures on children can draw from a spectrum of established techniques, new technology, and novel use of medications to decrease peri-procedural pain and anxiety. These techniques include distraction, optimization of local anesthesia, and mild to moderate sedation.

SUMMARY

We recommend using a combination of techniques to minimize pain and anxiety to improve safety, decrease healthcare costs, improve patient experience, and prevent childhood trauma and persistent negative perception of the healthcare system.

Clinically Important Pharmacologic Considerations for Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Hand Surgery

SUMMARY

Understanding the clinically important pharmacokinetics (what the body does to the drug) and pharmacodynamics (what the drug does to the body) of medications used in surgery will help surgeons use them more safely and effectively. The goal of this article is to provide an overview of these considerations for the 2 medications used in wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet upper extremity surgery (ie, lidocaine and epinephrine) to establish a better understanding of lidocaine and epinephrine in tumescent local anesthesia, as well as adverse reactions and how to manage them.

Comparison of Pain With Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular Hip Injections With and Without Prior Subcutaneous Local Anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To compare pain levels of intra-articular hip steroid injections performed with and without prior subcutaneous local anesthesia (LA) injection.

DESIGN

Randomized prospective study.

SETTING

University-based musculoskeletal clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-one adult patients undergoing a first-time ultrasound-guided unilateral intra-articular hip steroid injection.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: intra-articular hip injection with prior subcutaneous LA with 2 mL of lidocaine 1% (With LA) or hip injection without prior subcutaneous LA (Without LA). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (0-100) were collected before and after each injection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog scale pain score for the intra-articular hip injection.

RESULTS

Of the 41 total subjects, 18 were randomized to the Without LA group and 23 to the With LA group. There was no significant difference in baseline (preprocedure) VAS scores between the Without LA (mean ± SD = 39.2 ± 27.2) and With LA (41.2 ± 24.0) groups (P = 0.864). The mean ± SD VAS score for the subcutaneous LA injection in the With LA group was 20.4 ± 16.1. There was no significant difference in VAS scores for the intra-articular hip injection between the Without LA (48.5 ± 27.7) and With LA (39.5 ± 25.7) groups (P = 0.232).

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous injection of lidocaine before an intra-articular hip injection did not significantly decrease pain from the intra-articular hip injection. Providers may perform intra-articular hip injections with a 22-gauge 3.5-inch spinal needle without the need for an extra subcutaneous LA injection.

Optimizing pediatric periprocedural pain management part II-Adjunct therapies to support the use of infiltrative anesthetics

Pediatric procedure-related pain management is often incompletely understood, inadequately addressed, and critical in influencing a child's lifelong relationship with the larger healthcare community. We present a comprehensive review of infiltrative anesthetics, including a comparison of their mechanisms of action and relative safety and efficacy data to help guide clinical selection. We also describe the multimodal utilization of adjunct therapies-in series and in parallel-to support the optimization of pediatric periprocedural pain management, enhance the patient experience, and provide alternatives to sedation medication and general anesthesia.

Refraining from closed reduction of displaced distal radius fractures in the emergency department-in short: the RECORDED trial

BACKGROUND

With roughly 45,000 adult patients each year, distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in the emergency department. Approximately 60% of all these fractures are displaced and require surgery. The current guidelines advise to perform closed reduction of these fractures awaiting surgery, as it may lead to post-reduction pain relief and release tension of the surrounding neurovascular structures. Recent studies have shown that successful reduction does not warrant conservative treatment, while patients find it painful or even traumatizing. The aim of this study is to determine whether closed reduction can be safely abandoned in these patients.

METHODS

In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, we will randomize between closed reduction followed by plaster casting and only plaster casting. Patients aged 18 to 75 years, presenting at the emergency department with a displaced distal radial fracture and requiring surgery according to the attending surgeon, are eligible for inclusion. Primary outcome is pain assessed with daily VAS scores from the visit to the emergency department until surgery. Secondary outcomes are function assessed by PRWHE, length of stay at the emergency department, length of surgery, return to work, patient satisfaction, and complications. A total of 134 patients will be included in this study with follow-up of 1 year.

DISCUSSION

If our study shows that patients who did not receive closed reduction experience no significant drawbacks, we might be able to reorganize the initial care for distal radial fractures in the emergency department. If surgery is warranted, the patient can be sent home with a plaster cast to await the call for admission, decreasing the time spend in the emergency room drastically.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered on January 27, 2023.

A comparative evaluation of the efficiency of warm local anesthetic solution delivered on precooled injection sites with the conventional local anesthetic technique in 7-9-year-old children: A randomized split-mouth cross-over trial

BACKGROUND

Both precooling the site and injecting a warm anesthetic solution have proven to be efficient in reducing pain individually. However, there is insufficient data on evaluating the efficiency of precooling the site of injection along with the simultaneous administration of a warm local anesthetic solution on the same site in a single patient.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy, pain perception, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effects of a warm local anesthetic solution injected on precooled injection sites using 2% lignocaine with the conventional local anesthetic technique during inferior alveolar nerve block in 7-9-year-old children.

METHODS

A split-mouth, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 70 children who received 2% lignocaine with either technique A or B during the first or second appointment of the treatment procedure. The pain perception, anesthetic efficacy, pulse rate, oxygen saturation levels, and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Pain during injection and treatment after administration of the warm local anesthesia (LA) technique was less as compared to the conventional block technique. Anesthetic success was observed with a faster onset of action (212.57 ± 32.51 s) and shorter duration of LA (165.16 ± 33.09 min) in the warm local technique as compared to the conventional technique. No significant differences were found with regard to heart rate and oxygen saturation levels between the two techniques. Administrating warm LA solutions at precooled injection sites revealed fewer adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Injecting warm LA solution on precooled injection sites causes less discomfort and anxiety in children, which makes it more suitable for the child as well as the pediatric dentist.

Comparative Analysis of Local Anesthetic Techniques for Pain Management in Pediatric Dental Procedures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective

The present study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of different local anesthetic techniques for pain management in pediatric dental procedures. Goal is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of various local anesthetic methods to identify the most effective approach in reducing pain and discomfort during dental treatments in children.

Methods

A prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted with 60 pediatric patients (aged 3 to 10 years) undergoing dental procedures in a single dental clinic. The participants were randomly assigned into three groups: Group A received conventional infiltration anesthesia (lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000), Group B received topical anesthesia followed by the same infiltration anesthesia, and Group C received intraosseous anesthesia using articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000. The patients' demographic data, treatment details, and pre-procedure anxiety levels were recorded.

Results

The study demonstrated that all three local anesthetic techniques effectively managed pain during pediatric dental procedures. However, Group C, which received intraosseous anesthesia, showed significantly lower pain scores (mean ± standard deviation) compared to Group A and Group B: 1.5 ± 0.6, 2.3 ± 0.8, and 2.1 ± 0.7, respectively (P < 0.05). Additionally, Group C exhibited a shorter onset of anesthesia compared to Group A and Group B, with mean onset times of 1.8 ± 0.4, 3.2 ± 0.6, and 2.9 ± 0.5 minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). No significant differences in adverse events or post-procedure complications among the groups.

Conclusion

Intraosseous anesthesia (articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000) was found most effective local anesthetic technique for pain management during pediatric dental procedures.

Local Anesthesia Onset and Pain Perception in Hemophilic and Thalassemic Conditions

The study aims to evaluate and compare the onset of local anesthesia (LA) and pain perception during endodontic treatment in hemophilic and thalassemic patients. Methods: The study included 90 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molars. Three groups (n = 30 in each group) were included. Group 1: hemophilic patients; group 2: thalassemic patients; and group 3: individuals without any systemic diseases. Onset of LA and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores was recorded immediately after the administration of local anesthesia, during the pulp exposure procedure, and during canal instrumentation, and were compared between the three groups. Frequency distribution, ANOVA, and linear regression analysis (p < 0.05) were applied. Results: The mean onset time was 46 ± 34 s in the hemophilic group, 42 ± 23 s in the thalassemic group, and 38 ± 12 s in controls, but the differences were statistically insignificant. After LA administration (LA-VAS), all three groups experienced a statistically significant reduction in pain (p = 0.048). On pulp exposure (PE-VAS) (p = 0.82) and during canal instrumentation (CI-VAS) (p = 0.55), there was no statistically significant difference in pain perception between the groups. The coefficients indicate a positive correlation between the VAS and onset time, indicating a positive reduction in the VAS following the administration of LA. Conclusions: Hemophilic patients exhibited a clinically longer average onset time for LA. However, the difference among the three groups with regard to the overall pain perception after LA administration, during and after pulp exposure, and during canal instrumentation was statistically insignificant.

The Use of Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Management after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Study

(1) Background: The present study aims to evaluate the reduction of postoperative pain in breast surgery using a series of local analgesics, which were infiltrated into the wound; (2) Methods: Envelopes containing allocation were prepared prior to the study. The patients involved were randomly assigned to the groups of local anesthesia infiltration (Group A) or normal pain management with intravenous analgesics (Group B). The random allocation sequence was generated using computer-generated random numbers. The normally distributed continuous data were expressed as the means (SD) and were assessed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA), independent-sample t-test, or paired t-test; (3) Results: The development of the postoperative pain stages was recorded using the VAS score. Therefore, for Group A, the following results were obtained: the VAS at 6 h postoperatively showed an average value of 0.63 and a maximum value of 3. The results for Group B were the following: the VAS score at 6 h postoperatively showed an average value of 4.92, a maximum of 8, and a minimum of 2; (4) Conclusions: We can confirm that there are favorable statistical indicators regarding the postoperative pain management process during the first 24-38 h after a surgical intervention for breast cancer using local infiltration of anesthetics.

Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks-American Pain Society-American Academy of Pain Medicine Pain Taxonomy Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Needle Pain

Needle procedures are among the most common causes of pain and distress for individuals seeking health care. While needle pain is especially problematic for children needle pain and associated fear also has significant impact on adults and can lead to avoidance of appropriate medical care. Currently there is not a standard definition of needle pain. A taxonomy, or classification system, for acute needle pain would aid research efforts and enhance clinical care. To meet this need, the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks public-private partnership with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the American Pain Society, and the American Academy of Pain Medicine formed the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks-American Pain Society-American Academy of Pain Medicine Pain Taxonomy initiative. One of the goals of this initiative was to develop taxonomies for acute pain disorders, including needle pain. To accomplish this, a working group of experts in needle pain was convened. Based on available literature and expert opinion, the working group used a 5-dimenional structure (diagnostic criteria, common features, modulating factors, impact and/or functional consequences, and putative mechanisms) to develop an acute pain taxonomy that is specific needle pain. As part of this, a set of 4 diagnostic criteria, with 2 modifiers to account for the influence of needle associated fear, are proposed to define the types of acute needle pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a taxonomy for acute needle pain. This taxonomy could help to standardize definitions of acute pain in clinical studies of patients undergoing needle procedures.

Effects of fixation of clavicle fracture using wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique on intra-operative bleeding volume, surgical duration, and post-operatively visual analog scale (VAS); A case series study

Clavicle fractures are common fractures with a rate of 2-5 percent among fractures. Mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle are more common than the other sites of the clavicle. Traditionally, surgical fixation of clavicle fractures has been performed under General Anesthesia (GA). The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of WALANT on intraoperative bleeding, pain control during and after surgery, postoperative complications and patients' function. In the current study, 30 patients with clavicle fractures were surgically fixed using the WALANT technique. The obtained results showed that it could be an effective technique for pain control during the operation and also early postoperative period. Moreover, the WALANT technique could be considered safe in patients who are at risk for GA because of medical comorbidities, cervical spine injuries, or other factors that make intubation difficult.

2022 AAFP/ISFM Cat Friendly Veterinary Interaction Guidelines: Approach and Handling Techniques

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE

The '2022 AAFP/ISFM Cat Friendly Veterinary Interaction Guidelines: Approach and Handling Techniques' (hereafter the 'Cat Friendly Veterinary Interaction Guidelines') support veterinary professionals with feline interactions and handling to reduce the impact of fear and other protective (negative) emotions, in so doing enhancing feline welfare and In implementing these Guidelines, team satisfaction and cat caregiver confidence in the veterinary team will increase as the result of efficient examinations, better experience, more reliable diagnostic testing and improved feline wellbeing. Veterinary professionals will learn the importance of understanding and appropriately responding to the current emotional state of the cat and tailoring each visit to the individual.

CLINICAL CHALLENGES

Cats have evolved with emotions and behaviors that are necessary for their survival as both a predator and prey species. A clinical setting and the required examinations and procedures to meet their physical health needs can result in behavioral responses to protective emotions. Cat friendly interactions require understanding, interpreting and appropriately responding to cats' emotional states and giving them a perceived sense of control while performing the required assessment.

EVIDENCE BASE

These Guidelines have been created by a Task Force of experts convened by the American Association of Feline Practitioners and the International Society of Feline Medicine, based on an extensive literature review and, where evidence is lacking, the authors' experience.

ENDORSEMENTS

These Guidelines have been endorsed by a number of groups and organizations, as detailed on page 1127 and at catvets.com/interactions and icatcare.org/cat-friendly-guidelines.

Evaluation of pulpal anesthesia and injection pain using IANB with pre-heated, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine in teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis-a randomized clinical study

Background

The efficacy of 2% lignocaine is reduced in a hot tooth. Local aesthetic agents can be preheated and buffered to increase their effectiveness. The present investigation was carried out due to limited information concerning adult patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.

Methods

A total of 252 individuals were included in the clinical trial in accordance with the selection criteria only after clinical study was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2020/09/027796). Scores on the visual analog scale (VAS) and electric pulp test (EPT) on a 1-10 scale were recorded prior to the commencement of therapy. In this double-blinded study, patients were randomly divided by a co-investigator using computer randomisation (www.randomizer.org) into three groups, group A: inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) with 2% lignocaine preheated at 42 °C (injected at 37 °C) (N = 84), group B: IANB of 2% lignocaine buffered with 0.18 ml of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (N = 80) and group C: 2% lignocaine (N = 88). Excluding the dropouts of individuals (n = 11), wherein the anaesthesia failed, a total of 241 people were finally assessed 15 minutes after profound anaesthesia, endodontic access, and intraoperative pain were quantified using VAS. Pain on injection for all three groups was recorded immediately after IANB with VAS. The analysis was performed using one way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test and Paired T-Test using SPSS version 21.

Results

Preheated, Buffered, and conventional 2% lignocaine showed statistically significant reduction in intraoperative pain (P < 0.001) compared to pre-operative but on inter-group comparison preheated and buffered showed highly significant pain reduction compared with conventional 2% lignocaine (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Warm and buffered local anaesthetic (LA) were effective in reducing intraoperative discomfort than conventional LA. Preheated local anesthetics caused the least pain, followed by buffered local anesthetics, while conventional local anesthetics caused the most pain.

Local anaesthetics in dermatological surgery: a review of adjuncts and pain reduction techniques

A variety of adjuncts for local anaesthesia (LA) exists for dermatological surgery, along with many options to reduce the pain of LA. This review aims to summarize the evidence relating to such adjuncts and methods to reduce the pain of LA. Adjuncts to LA can be an important consideration to optimize anaesthetic effect. Current evidence suggests that buffering and warming of LA fluid, along with cooling, pinching and administering vibrations to the skin are effective at reducing pain during administration. In this review, no significant difference in pain reduction was found between cooling and administering vibrations to the skin. Studies demonstrate that, overall, LA injection into distal sites is safe. However, the evidence specific to dermatological surgery is limited with regard to ways to reduce pain during LA injection and in determining the safety of LA for distal sites with confidence. Further high-quality research in the form of multicentre randomized controlled trials is required.

Local Anesthesia in Interventional Radiology

Interventional radiology is an evolving field that treats a variety of diseases. Local anesthetics is an important component of pain management during interventional radiologic procedures. It is highly effective and generally safe for routine procedures. However, local anesthetics can be associated with painful initial injection, allergic reactions, and rare but potentially devastating systemic toxicities. Recent evidence has shown that buffered solution and warm local anesthetics may reduce injection discomfort and improve clinical efficacy. Sensible safety practices and prompt recognition/treatment of the systemic toxicity are of paramount importance to provide safe local anesthesia. Interventional radiologists should be familiar with the basic pharmacology, common local anesthetics, optimizing strategies, complications, and management to provide safe and effective local anesthesia for patients.

Digital nerve blocks: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study objective

Digital nerve blocks (DNBs) provide local anesthesia for minor procedures of the digits. Several DNB techniques have been described, but it is unclear which technique provides adequate anesthesia with the least pain. DNB techniques can be grouped into a dorsal approach, which requires 2 injections, versus 3 different types of volar approaches, which require a single injection. We performed a meta-analysis to compare DNB techniques with respect to time to anesthesia (TTA), duration of anesthesia (DOA), and pain of injection. We also reviewed data on degree and distribution of anesthesia and discuss the techniques preferred by study participants and clinicians performing injections.

Data Sources

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases with terms "digital block," "digital nerve block," "local anesthetic," "local anesthesia," "lidocaine," and/or "bupivacaine."

Study Selection

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were prioritized, though high-quality prospective cohort studies were also eligible. All included studies evaluated DNB techniques or anesthetics. There were 23 papers (21 RCTs, 2 prospective descriptive studies) included.

Data Extraction

DNBs studied included dorsal ring block, traditional dorsal block, transthecal block, modified transthecal block, and volar subcutaneous digital blocks. Outcomes measured included TTA, DOA, pain of injection scores, and degree of anesthesia.

Results

Overall, mean TTA was 4.5 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5, 5.6), mean DOA was 187 minutes (95% CI 104.3, 269.7), and mean pain score was 2.1 out of 10 (95% CI 1.3, 2.8) without significant differences between studies or techniques.

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in the outcomes of TTA, DOA, and pain of injection between different DNB techniques. Single-injection volar approaches may be preferred by participants and clinicians over dorsal approaches that require 2 injections, particularly with respect to pain. However, 2-injection dorsal approaches may have better coverage of the proximal dorsal surface based on degree and distribution of anesthesia.

Comparison of pain and extent of anesthesia in digital blocks for isolated finger lacerations: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES:

Digital injuries are among the most common presentations to the emergency department. In order to sufficiently examine and manage these injuries, adequate, prompt, and predictable anesthesia is essential. In this trial, we aim to primarily compare the degree of pain and anesthesia onset time between the two-injection dorsal block technique (TD) and the single-injection volar subcutaneous block (SV) technique. Further, we describe the temporal and anatomical effects of both techniques for an accurate delineation of the anesthetized regions.

METHODS:

This is a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial involving patients presenting with isolated wounds to the fingers requiring primary repair under local anesthesia. Patients were randomized to either the SV or TD blocks. The primary outcome was procedure-related pain (Numerical Rating Scale). Further, we assessed the extent of anesthesia along with the anesthesia onset time.

RESULTS:

A total of 100 patients were included in the final analysis, 50 on each arm of the study. The median pain score during injection was significantly higher in patients who received TD block than patients who received SV block (median [interquartile range] = 4 [2.25, 5.00] vs. 3.00 [2.00, 4.00], respectively, P = 0.006). However, anesthesia onset time was not statistically different among the groups (P = 0.39). The extent of anesthesia was more predictable in the dorsal block compared to the volar block.

CONCLUSION:

The single-injection volar subcutaneous blocks are less painful with a similar anesthesia onset time. Injuries presenting in the proximal dorsal region may benefit from the two-injection dorsal blocks, given the anatomical differences and timely anesthesia of the region.

New insight into the importance of formulation variables on parenteral growth hormone preparations: potential effect on the injection-site pain

Reducing injection-site pain (ISP) in patients with chronic conditions such as growth hormone deficiency is a valuable strategy to improve patient compliance and therapeutic efficiency. Thus understanding different aspects of pain induction following subcutaneous injection of biotherapeutics and identifying the responsible factors are vital. Here we have discussed the effects of formulation's viscosity, concentration, osmolality, buffering agents, pH, and temperature as well as injection volume, dosing frequency, and different excipients on ISP following subcutaneous injection of commercially available recombinant human growth hormone products. Our literature review found limited available data on the effects of different components of parenteral rhGH products on ISP. This may be due to high cost associated with conducting various clinical trials to assess each excipient in the formulation or to determine the complex interactions of different components and its impact on ISP. Recently, conducting molecular dynamics simulation studies before formulation design has been recommended as an alternative and less-expensive approach. On the other hand, the observed inconsistencies in the available data is mainly due to different pain measurement approaches used in each study. Moreover, it is difficult to translate data obtained from animal studies to human subjects. Despite all these limitations, our investigation showed that components of parenteral rhGH products can significantly contribute to ISP. We suggest further investigation is required for development of long acting, buffer-free, preservative-free formulations. Besides, various excipients are currently being investigated for reducing ISP which can be used as alternatives for common buffers, surfactants or preservatives in designing future rhGH formulations.

Updates on Wound Infiltration Use for Postoperative Pain Management: A Narrative Review

Local anesthetic wound infiltration (WI) provides anesthesia for minor surgical procedures and improves postoperative analgesia as part of multimodal analgesia after general or regional anesthesia. Although pre-incisional block is preferable, in practice WI is usually done at the end of surgery. WI performed as a continuous modality reduces analgesics, prolongs the duration of analgesia, and enhances the patient’s mobilization in some cases. WI benefits are documented in open abdominal surgeries (Caesarean section, colorectal surgery, abdominal hysterectomy, herniorrhaphy), laparoscopic cholecystectomy, oncological breast surgeries, laminectomy, hallux valgus surgery, and radical prostatectomy. Surgical site infiltration requires knowledge of anatomy and the pain origin for a procedure, systematic extensive infiltration of local anesthetic in various tissue planes under direct visualization before wound closure or subcutaneously along the incision. Because the incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity is 11% after subcutaneous WI, appropriate local anesthetic dosing is crucial. The risk of wound infection is related to the infection incidence after each particular surgery. For WI to fully meet patient and physician expectations, mastery of the technique, patient education, appropriate local anesthetic dosing and management of the surgical wound with “aseptic, non-touch” technique are needed.

EULAR recommendations for intra-articular therapies

OBJECTIVES

To establish evidence-based recommendations to guide health professionals using intra-articular therapies (IAT) in adult patients with peripheral arthropathies.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary international task force established the objectives, users and scope and the need for background information, including systematic literature reviews) and two surveys addressed to healthcare providers and patients throughout Europe. The evidence was discussed in a face-to-face meeting, recommendations were formulated and subsequently voted for anonymously in a three-round Delphi process to obtain the final agreement. The level of evidence was assigned to each recommendation with the Oxford levels of evidence.

RESULTS

Recommendations focus on practical aspects to guide health professionals before, during and after IAT in adult patients with peripheral arthropathies. Five overarching principles and 11 recommendations were established, addressing issues related to patient information, procedure and setting, accuracy, routine and special aseptic care, safety issues and precautions to be addressed in special populations, efficacy and safety of repeated joint injections, use of local anaesthetics and aftercare.

CONCLUSION

We have developed the first evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations to guide health professionals using IAT. We hope that these recommendations will be included in different educational programmes, used by patient associations and put into practice via scientific societies to help improve uniformity and quality of care when performing IAT in peripheral adult joints.

Effect of precooling injection site and cold anesthetic administration on injection pain, onset, and anesthetic efficacy in maxillary molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This randomized controlled clinical trial assessed the analgesic and anesthetic effects of precooling the injection site and administration of refrigerated 2% lignocaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine (LE) in maxillary molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients diagnosed with SIP (preoperative pain score ≥ 85 mm) in maxillary first molars were randomly allocated to two groups. In group I (control), topical gel was applied for a minute followed by conventional LE infiltration, whereas in group II (experimental), topical ice application for 15 s and refrigerated (4-6 °C) LE administration was done prior to endodontic treatment. The primary outcome measure was anesthetic efficacy that was defined as none to weak pain (≤ 36 mm) as measured on Heft Parker visual analog scale (HP-VAS) following access cavity preparation. Pain on injection and onset constituted the secondary outcome measures. The pain on injection was measured using HP-VAS, whereas the onset of anesthesia was assessed using an electric pulp tester (EPT) which was applied on the experimental tooth every minute until no response was elicited. Mann-Whitney U test was performed to analyze the data (p < 0.01).

RESULTS

Experimental group reported a success rate of 86.6% when compared to control group (26.6%) and a statistically significant reduction on injection pain (20.0 mm vs 54.5 mm) (p < 0.01). The onset of anesthesia for experimental group was 2.4 min which was also significantly lower than control group (4.5 min) (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Cryotherapy can serve as an effective alternative to conventional anesthesia for achieving success, reduced pain, and faster onset during endodontic treatment of maxillary molars with SIP.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Precooling the injection site and cold LE administration can result in effective pulpal anesthesia during endodontic management of maxillary molars in SIP patients.

How to Minimize the Pain of Local Anesthetic Injection for Wide Awake Surgery

After reading this article, the participant should be able to (1) almost painlessly inject tumescent local anesthesia to anesthetize small or large parts of the body, (2) improve surgical safety by eliminating the need for unnecessary sedation in patients with multiple medical comorbidities, and (3) convert many limb and face operations to wide awake surgery. We recommend the following 13 tips to minimize the pain of local anesthesia injection: (1) buffer local anesthetic with sodium bicarbonate; (2) use smaller 27- or 30-gauge needles; (3) immobilize the syringe with two hands and have your thumb ready on the plunger before inserting the needle; (4) use more than one type of sensory noise when inserting needles into the skin; (5) try to insert the needle at 90 degrees; (6) do not inject in the dermis, but in the fat just below it; (7) inject at least 2 ml slowly just under the dermis before moving the needle at all and inject all local anesthetic slowly when you start to advance the needle; (8) never advance sharp needle tips anywhere that is not yet numb; (9) always inject from proximal to distal relative to nerves; (10) use blunt-tipped cannulas when tumescing large areas; (11) only reinsert needles into skin that is already numb when injecting large areas; (12) always ask patients to tell you every time they feel pain during the whole injection process so that you can score yourself and improve with each injection; (13) always inject too much volume instead of not enough volume to eliminate surgery pain and the need for "top ups."

Tablet Computer as a Distraction Tool During Facial Laceration Repair: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

Child life interventions reduce the anxiety of medical procedures but are not always available in emergency departments. In this study, we determined the effect of parent-directed tablet computer use without child life direction on patient anxiety and on parent and suturing clinician experience during pediatric facial laceration repair.

METHODS

In a children's hospital emergency department, we enrolled children 2 to 12 years of age undergoing unsedated facial laceration repairs and randomized them to parent-directed tablet computer distraction or standard supportive care. We measured anxiety using the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (OSBD-R) for 5 procedure phases from videotaped laceration repairs. We compared OSBD-R scores for 5 phases and weighted averages between the tablet and standard care groups. Parents and suturing clinicians completed surveys about their experiences after the procedures.

RESULTS

From April 2014 to July 2015, 77 patients (39 tablet, 38 standard) underwent repairs. Age, use of restraint, procedure duration, and number of sutures were similar between the 2 groups. The groups did not differ in procedure phase or weighted-average OSBD-R scores. Parents in the tablet group reported less personal anxiety compared with parents in the standard group (P = 0.01). In a post hoc subgroup analysis, subjects in the unrestrained tablet group had lower OSBD-R scores during the anesthetic injection phase than did subjects in the unrestrained standard group (P = 0.04). If restrained, subjects in the tablet group had higher OSBD-R scores during the anesthetic injection phase than did subjects in the standard group (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Unrestrained children may benefit from parent-directed tablet computer distraction. Parents who operate the device are less anxious during their children's procedures.

Hair Transplant Practice Guidelines

The field of hair transplant (HT) has grown exponentially in the past decade, especially after the introduction of follicular unit excision (FUE). There is much variation in criteria for case selection, the technique, pre- and post-procedure protocols, by different surgeons. Techniques continue to evolve and evidence in the form of controlled data is not available for all techniques and protocols being used; there is also a debate as to who can do what, what should be the training for staff, role of technicians. This has led to a situation wherein medico legal issues have cropped up as to what is minimum acceptable. An attempt is made to summarize standard protocols with the available evidence. It is emphasized that the objective of these guidelines is to recommend minimum standards for practice of hair transplantation. The principles outlined in these guidelines are of a general nature only, minimal in their level and are not meant to cover all situations. It should be understood that these recommendations are by no means binding and universal, represent minimum standards only and as in all surgical techniques, variations in techniques are possible. It is also further clarified that these are based on current literature, and as science evolves, these guidelines could also change in future. Where published evidence is not available, consensus expert opinion is presented. The task force emphasizes that each patient has to be treated on his/her own merit and that these guidelines do not limit the physician from making an appropriate choice or the necessary innovation for a given patient. The task force recognizes that the treating surgeon is best suited to decide what is needed for a given patient in a given situation. Innovations in medicine need flexibility in approach and these guidelines do not limit the surgeon from undertaking innovative research.

Managing pain associated with dermatologic procedures

Dermatologists are faced with an aging population, accompanied by an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, especially nonmelanoma skin cancer. With this increase in cutaneous malignancy comes an increase in the number of dermatologic procedures being performed. A common concern of dermatologists and dermatology patients is the attenuation and management of pain associated with dermatologic procedures. Fortunately, there are several techniques that may be used in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods to manage patient anxiety, minimize injection pain, and safely and effectively treat postoperative pain.

[Forms of anesthesia in ophthalmology]

The range of anesthesiological procedures in ophthalmology has not changed significantly over the last decades, with local anesthesia clearly coming to the fore. The development of minimally invasive surgical techniques requires significantly less analgesia and economic constraints to shorten operating times. The increasing proportion of outpatient ophthalmic surgery requires a short analgesia of the surgical area with as few complications as possible. Nevertheless, the selection of the procedures, which are described here in detail, must be made individually for each patient. General anesthesia continues to have its place, especially in cases of reduced compliance and difficult surgical conditions. The close cooperation between anesthetists and ophthalmic surgeons, e.g. for analgosedation in the outpatient area, can create a very pleasant surgical experience for the patient. An important goal should always be sufficient anxiolysis, analgesia and, in special operations, sufficient akinesia.

Local Anesthesia Prior to Ultrasound-Guided Hip Joint Injections: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Bacteriostatic Saline versus Buffered Lidocaine

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US)-guided hip joint injections are commonly performed for patients with suspected or known intra-articular hip pain. Lidocaine is a well-established local anesthetic used prior to hip joint injections, but it is often associated with discomfort during infiltration. Bacteriostatic saline is an alternative local anesthetic that has been shown to be less painful during infiltration for superficial injections.

OBJECTIVE

To compare infiltrative pain and anesthetic efficacy of bacteriostatic saline (0.9% benzyl alcohol) with a standard local anesthetic (buffered 1% lidocaine) used for local anesthesia prior to US-guided intra-articular hip corticosteroid injections.

DESIGN

Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary care medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty eight patients age 18-80 (mean 54.8) years referred for US-guided intra-articular hip corticosteroid injections.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to receive a US-guided hip joint corticosteroid injection using either bacteriostatic saline or buffered 1% lidocaine for preinjection local anesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain (0-100) during local anesthetic infiltration as well as during the intra-articular injection. Adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between bacteriostatic saline and buffered lidocaine with respect to pain during local anesthetic infiltration or during the subsequent intra-articular injection. Pain VAS during local anesthetic infiltration was 13.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8, 18.5) in the bacteriostatic saline group and 14.0 (95% CI 9.4, 18.5) in the buffered 1% lidocaine group (P = .82). Furthermore, pain VAS during the intra-articular injection was 20.7 (95% CI 14.1, 27.3) in the bacteriostatic saline group and 15.7 (95% CI 10.9, 20.3) in the buffered 1% lidocaine group (P = .57). No adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacteriostatic saline is a safe and comparably effective alternative to buffered 1% lidocaine for local anesthesia before US-guided hip joint injections and may be considered for subcutaneous/periarticular anesthesia during similar musculoskeletal procedures.

Effect of warming local anesthesia solutions before intraoral administration in dentistry: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of warmed and unwarmed local anesthesia solutions in reduction of pain during intraoral injection administration.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid SP, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from publication years 1990 to 2020 with relevant MeSH terms. Studies were screened by titles and abstracts, followed by full-texts evaluation of the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of four studies were included in the systematic review. Outcomes evaluated were subjective and objective pain during administration of the warmed local anesthesia solution in comparison with the unwarmed local anesthesia solution. Among the four studies that evaluated the self-reported pain score, three studies showed significantly lower pain scores associated with warmed local anesthesia. Only two studies evaluated the observed pain score, and both of them reported a significantly lower pain reaction with the warmed local anesthesia solution.

CONCLUSION

Within the limits of this systematic review, warming the local anesthesia solution to body temperature (37℃) before administration seemed to reduce the discomfort during intraoral local anaesthesia administration, and more high-quality studies should be carried out to validate the same.

Local anesthesia in piglets undergoing castration-A comparative study to investigate the analgesic effects of four local anesthetics on the basis of acute physiological responses and limb movements

Surgical castration of male piglets without analgesia is a painful procedure. This prospective, randomized and double-blinded study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effects of four different local anesthetics for piglet castration during the first week of life. In total, 54 piglets aged 3 to 7 days were distributed into 6 treatment groups: handling (H); castration without pain relief (sodium chloride, NaCl); and castration with a local anesthetic: 4% procaine (P), 2% lidocaine (L), 0.5% bupivacaine (B) or 20 mg/ml mepivacaine (M). By excluding stress and fear as disruptive factors via a minimum anesthesia model, all piglets received individual minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) isoflurane anesthesia. Twenty minutes before castration, all treatment groups except group H received one injection per testis. Then, 0.5 ml of a local anesthetic or NaCl was injected intratesticularly (i.t.), and 0.5 ml was administered subscrotally. Acute physiological responses to noxious stimuli at injection and castration were evaluated by measuring blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine and chromogranin A (CgA); limb movements were quantified. The results confirm that castration without analgesia is highly painful. Surgical castration without pain relief revealed significant changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and HR. Local anesthetic administration significantly reduced changes in BP and HR associated with castration. Piglets receiving a preoperative local anesthetic exhibited the fewest limb movements during castration, while the NaCl group exhibited the most. Injection itself was not associated with significant changes in MAP or HR. However, many piglets exhibited limb movements during injection, indicating that the injection itself causes nociceptive pain. No significant differences were found between groups regarding parameters of plasma cortisol, catecholamines and CgA. In conclusion, all four local anesthetics administered are highly effective at reducing signs of nociception during castration under light isoflurane anesthesia. However, injection of a local anesthetic seems to be painful.

Tourniquet Use for Short Hand Surgery Procedures Done Under Local Anesthesia Without Epinephrine

PURPOSE

Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is an increasingly popular surgical technique. However, owing to surgeon preference, patient factors, or hospital guidelines, it may not be feasible to inject patients with solutions containing epinephrine the recommended 25 minutes prior to incision. The purpose of this study was to assess pain and patient experience after short hand surgeries done under local anesthesia using a tourniquet rather than epinephrine for hemostasis.

METHODS

Ninety-six consecutive patients undergoing short hand procedures using only local anesthesia and a tourniquet (LA-T) were assessed before and after surgery. A high arm pneumatic tourniquet was used in 73 patients and a forearm pneumatic tourniquet was used in 23. All patients received a local, unbuffered plain lidocaine injection. No patients received sedation. Pain related to local anesthesia, pneumatic tourniquet, and the procedure was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Patient experience was assessed using a study-specific questionnaire based on previous WALANT studies. Tourniquet times were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean pain related to anesthetic injection was rated 3.9 out of 10. Mean tourniquet related pain was 2.9 out of 10 for high arm pneumatic tourniquets and 2.3 out of 10 for forearm pneumatic tourniquets. Patients rated their experience with LA-T favorably and 95 of 96 patients (99%) reported that they would choose LA-T again for an equivalent procedure. Mean tourniquet time was 9.6 minutes and only 1 patient had a tourniquet inflated for more than 20 minutes. Tourniquet times less than 10 minutes were associated with less pain than tourniquet times greater than 10 minutes (P < .05); however, both groups reported the tourniquet to be on average less painful than the local anesthetic injection.

CONCLUSION

Short wide-awake procedures using a tourniquet are feasible and well accepted. Local anesthetic injection was reported to be more painful than pneumatic tourniquet use. Tourniquets for short wide-awake procedures can be used in settings in which preprocedure epinephrine injections are logistically difficult or based on surgeon preference.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Evaluation of effect of warm local anesthetics on pain perception during dental injections in children: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

The present study evaluates the efficacy of warm local anesthetic (37 °C) administration and injections of local anesthetics at room temperature (21 °C) in reducing pain during injections in children undergoing dental procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Enrolled for this split-mouth randomized clinical study were 100 children aged 5-8 years. Within the random crossover design selected for the study, each patient was randomly assigned to receive either a body or room temperature local anesthesia in the first session and the other local anesthesia on the second session. During the injection, the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale was used as a subjective measure of discomfort, and heart rate as an objective measure. The Face, Legs, Arms, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale was used to record the child's pain, based on the perception of the dental assistant. The data were analyzed using a Wilcoxon sign rank test and a paired t test.

RESULTS

Based on the score of the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, the FLACC scale, and heart rate, the sensation of pain during dental injection in both girls and boys is statistically significantly lower at body temperature than at room temperature (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

It was determined that the application of local anesthetic at body temperature reduces dental injection pain significantly when compared with local anesthetics administered at room temperature.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The successful management of dental injection pain is an important issue during dental procedures in children. Accordingly, warming the local anesthesia prior to use in children can be recommended to clinicians.

Pain perception and efficacy of local analgesia using 2% lignocaine, buffered lignocaine, and 4% articaine in pediatric dental procedures

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the pain perception and anesthetic efficacy of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, buffered lignocaine, and 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for the inferior alveolar nerve block.

Methods

This was a double-blind crossover study involving 48 children aged 5–10 years, who received three inferior alveolar nerve block injections in three appointments scheduled one week apart from the next. Pain on injection was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces pain scale and the sound eye motor scale (SEM). Efficacy of anesthesia was assessed by subjective (tingling or numbness of the lip, tongue, and corner of mouth) and objective signs (pain on probing).

Results

Pain perception on injection assessed with Wong-Baker scale was significantly different between buffered lignocaine and lignocaine (P < 0.001) and between buffered lignocaine and articaine (P = 0.041). The onset of anesthesia was lowest for buffered lignocaine, with a statistically significant difference between buffered lignocaine and lignocaine (P < 0.001). Moreover, the efficacy of local analgesia assessed using objective signs was significantly different between buffered lignocaine and lignocaine (P < 0.001) and between lignocaine and articaine.

Conclusion

Buffered lignocaine was the least painful and the most efficacious anesthetic agent during the inferior alveolar nerve block injection in 5–10-year-old patients.

Local anesthesia and anxiolytic techniques for oculoplastic surgery

This study discusses local anesthetic agents, administration techniques, ancillary considerations, and safety precautions for oculoplastic surgery including eyelid, lacrimal, orbital, and temporal artery biopsy procedures. Methods for reducing patient apprehension and discomfort including systemic premedication, topical pre-anesthetic, visual, auditory and tactile distraction techniques, regional blocks, small gauge needles, warmed lidocaine, and buffered lidocaine are discussed.

Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Background: Maintaining primary teeth in the oral cavity is of prime importance, and grossly carious teeth may require pulp therapy for the same. Pain on injection and incomplete anesthesia causes failure of the procedure and result in fear and anxiety. Various methods have evolved to overcome this; such as distraction, topical anesthesia, etc. A few techniques regaining popularity in dentistry in recent times is the warming or buffering of the solution prior to administration. This study thus aimed to compare and evaluate the anesthetic efficacy and the patient’s pain reaction to pre-warmed, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in mandibular primary molars undergoing pulp therapy.

Methods: The study is a randomized, split-mouth trial. Sixty children between six -12 years, requiring pulp therapy bilaterally on mandibular primary molars, were administered conventional, buffered or pre-warmed 2% lignocaine on two separate appointments. Various parameters were assessed using objective and subjective scales.

Results: Pre-warmed and buffered anesthetics had lesser pain on injection (p<0.001, p<0.001) and pulp therapy (p=0.001, p=0.014), faster onset of action (p=0.004, p=0.001), lower SEM Sound (p=0.035, p=0.028), Eye (p< 0.001, p=0.013) and Motor (p=0.008, p=0.021) scores and shorter duration of action (p< 0.001, p=0.015). No significant difference was found between the two modified solutions. Thus pre-warmed and buffered anesthetic solutions fared better than the conventional solution for all parameters but had no advantage over each other.

Conclusion: Buffering or pre-warming the anesthetic solution reduces pain on administration and during procedures in children.

Trial registration number: CTRI/2017/02/007922

Effect of warming anesthetic on pain perception during dental injection: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of warming anesthesia on the control of the pain produced during the administration of dental anesthesia injection and to analyze the role of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid-1 nociceptor channels in this effect.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A double-blind, split-mouth randomized clinical trial was designed. Seventy-two volunteer students (22.1±2.45 years old; 51 men) from the School of Dentistry at the Universidad Austral de Chile (Valdivia, Chile) participated. They were each administered 0.9 mL of lidocaine HCl 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000 (Alphacaine®) using two injections in the buccal vestibule at the level of the upper lateral incisor teeth. Anesthesia was administered in a hemiarch at 42°C (107.6°F) and after 1 week, anesthesia was administered by randomized sequence on the contralateral side at room temperature (21°C-69.8°F) at a standardized speed. The intensity of pain perceived during the injection was compared using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS; Wilcoxon test p<0.05).

RESULTS

The use of anesthesia at room temperature produced an average VAS for pain of 35.3±16.71 mm and anesthesia at 42°C produced VAS for pain of 15±14.67 mm (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The use of anesthesia at 42°C significantly reduced the pain during the injection of anesthesia compared to its use at room temperature during maxillary injections. The physiological mechanism of the temperature on pain reduction could be due to a synergic action on the permeabilization of the Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid-1 channels, allowing the passage of anesthetic inside the nociceptors.

Prospective Assessment of Pain and Comfort in Chronic Pain Patients Undergoing Interventional Pain Management Procedures

Objective

Interventional pain management procedures have an important role in the management of chronic pain. The present study seeks to identify the proportion of patients who experience severe pain during pain procedures either with or without sedation. There is then an attempt to identify any association of high pain levels with factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, preprocedure pain level, procedure type, tobacco use, and baseline pharmaceuticals taken for both pain and/or mood disorder management.

Methods

This is a prospective survey study evaluating patients' discomfort during interventional pain procedures in an outpatient academic facility. Patient discomfort was assessed by the PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) and modified for nonsedation cases.

Results

There were 155 patients in the survey, with 20 of these receiving nonspinal injections. Of the remaining 135 patients who underwent spinal injections, only 10 received conscious sedation. On average, 14.2% experienced severe pain during spinal injections, whereas 20% experienced severe pain with nonspinal injections. Though few patients received conscious sedation, most of these (60%) experienced high levels of pain. There was no correlation between level of procedural pain with age, gender, ethnicity, preprocedure pain level, procedure type, tobacco use, or medication type used.

Conclusions

The majority of patients who undergo nonsedated interventional pain management procedures do not experience severe pain. There is a small but appreciable group of subjects who seem to experience severe pain that cannot be correlated to any particular clinical characteristic in a standard patient evaluation. Even with standard conscious sedation, there is no clear best method to ensure patient comfort for this high-pain level group.

Use of Wide-awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet in Hand and Wrist Surgery

WALANT (wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet) appears to be a safe and effective anesthesia technique for many hand and wrist surgeries. Patient satisfaction is high because of the avoidance of preoperative testing and hospital admission. Postoperative recovery is rapid, and procedures can be done in outpatient settings, resulting in substantial savings in time and money.

Finer Needles Reduce Pain Associated With Injection of Local Anesthetic Using a Minimal Insertion Injection Technique

BACKGROUND

The injection of local anesthetic into the skin is often the only memorable event described by the patient after dermatologic procedures.

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared the pain felt during injection of local anesthetic using a minimal needle insertion technique with a 30- or 33-gauge needle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred eighteen patients with tumors on the head and neck were injected with lidocaine using a previously described technique with either a 30- or 33-gauge needle. After injection, patients were surveyed using the visual assessment scale for pain.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven percent of patients felt no pain with injection on the face using a 33-gauge needle compared with 64% with a 30 gauge, whereas 94% of patients felt no pain on the scalp with a 33-gauge needle compared with 54% with a 30 gauge. Visual analog scale scores were also significantly decreased on the face and scalp using the smaller needle. There was no difference in pain between the 2 needles with injection on the neck.

CONCLUSION

This study further validates the use of this technique for the injection of lidocaine and the preference of a 33 gauge over a 30-gauge needle for the initial injection on the face and scalp.

Is it safe to use local anesthesia with adrenaline in hand surgery? WALANT technique

In the past it was taught that local anesthetic should not be used with adrenaline for procedures in the extremities. This dogma is transmitted from generation to generation. Its truth has not been questioned, nor the source of the doubt. In many situations the benefit of use was not understood, because it was often thought that it was not necessary to prolong the anesthetic effect, since the procedures were mostly of short duration. After the disclosure of studies of Canadian surgeons, came to understand that the benefits went beyond the time of anesthesia. The WALANT technique allows a surgical field without bleeding, possibility of information exchange with the patient during the procedure, reduction of waste material, reduction of costs, and improvement of safety. Thus, after passing through the initial phase of the doubts in the use of this technique, the authors verified its benefits and the patients’ satisfaction in being able to immediately return home after the procedures.