1
|
Webb PM, Jordan SJ. Global epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:389-400. [PMID: 38548868 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00881-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Globally, ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer in women, accounting for an estimated 3.7% of cases and 4.7% of cancer deaths in 2020. Until the early 2000s, age-standardized incidence was highest in northern Europe and North America, but this trend has changed; incidence is now declining in these regions and increasing in parts of eastern Europe and Asia. Ovarian cancer is a very heterogeneous disease and, even among the most common type, namely epithelial ovarian cancer, five major clinically and genetically distinct histotypes exist. Most high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas are now recognized to originate in the fimbrial ends of the fallopian tube. This knowledge has led to more cancers being coded as fallopian tube in origin, which probably explains some of the apparent declines in ovarian cancer incidence, particularly in high-income countries; however, it also suggests that opportunistic salpingectomy offers an important opportunity for prevention. The five histotypes share several reproductive and hormonal risk factors, although differences also exist. In this Review, we summarize the epidemiology of this complex disease, comparing the different histotypes, and consider the potential for prevention. We also discuss how changes in the prevalence of risk and protective factors might have contributed to the observed changes in incidence and what this might mean for incidence in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope M Webb
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Susan J Jordan
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee NK, Tiro JA, Odunsi K. Disparities in Gynecologic Cancers. Cancer J 2023; 29:343-353. [PMID: 37963369 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Gynecologic cancer disparities have different trends by cancer type and by sociodemographic/economic factors. We highlight disparities in the United States arising due to poor delivery of cancer care across the continuum from primary prevention, detection, and diagnosis through treatment and identify opportunities to eliminate/reduce disparities to achieve cancer health equity. Our review documents the persistent racial and ethnic disparities in cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancer outcomes, with Black patients experiencing the worst outcomes, and notes literature investigating social determinants of health, particularly access to care. Although timely delivery of screening and diagnostic evaluation is of paramount importance for cervical cancer, efforts for ovarian and uterine cancer need to focus on timely recognition of symptoms, diagnostic evaluation, and delivery of guideline-concordant cancer treatment, including tumor biomarker and somatic/germline genetic testing.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bizzarri N, Pavone M, Loverro M, Querleu D, Fagotti A, Scambia G. Ovarian preservation in gynecologic oncology: current indications and techniques. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:401-411. [PMID: 37498120 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Early menopause represents a relevant clinical issue for women. Nevertheless, this issue should be balanced with the risks of ovarian metastasis, ovarian recurrence, and the risk of recurrence in hormone-sensitive gynecological cancers. The purpose of this review was to provide an overview on current indications and techniques of ovarian preservation in patients with gynecological cancers. RECENT FINDINGS The potential discussion about ovarian conservation could be proposed to patients with FIGO-stage IA grade 1-2 endometrioid endometrial cancer aged 40 years or less, FIGO-stage IB1-IB2 node-negative cervical cancer with squamous cell carcinoma and HPV-associated adenocarcinoma, FIGO-stage IA-IC grade 1-2 serous, endometrioid, mucinous expansile pattern ovarian cancer, any stage germ cell ovarian tumors, and FIGO-stage IA sex cord-stromal tumors. Technique to perform ovarian transposition in cervix cancer is also reported. SUMMARY Ovarian conservation is a surgical approach that involves preserving one or both ovaries during the treatment of gynecologic cancers. This approach has gained popularity in recent years, as it offers several benefits to the patient, including the preservation of hormonal function and fertility. The decision to perform ovarian conservation depends on several factors, such as the stage and type of cancer, the patient's age, fertility desire, and should be carefully discussed with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
| | - Matteo Pavone
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
| | - Matteo Loverro
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
| | - Denis Querleu
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
| | - Anna Fagotti
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ali AT, Al-ani O, Al-ani F. Epidemiology and risk factors for ovarian cancer. PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY = MENOPAUSE REVIEW 2023; 22:93-104. [PMID: 37674925 PMCID: PMC10477765 DOI: 10.5114/pm.2023.128661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a complex disease, mostly observed in postmenopausal women, and is associated with poor survival rates. It is the sixth most common cancer and the fifth most common cause of death due to cancer among women in developed countries. Thus, despite representing less than one third of all gynaecologic cancers, deaths due to ovarian cancer account for more than two thirds of deaths due to gynaecologic cancers. Its prevalence is higher in Western Europe and Northern America than Asia and Africa. In sub-Saharan Africa, there is a considerably lower prevalence of ovarian cancer than other parts of Africa. Ovarian cancer is multifaceted, involving many factors, complex biological processes and unpredictable consequences. Unlike other female cancers that have early warning symptoms, ovarian cancer's symptoms are non-specific. As a result, ovarian cancers are normally undetected until advanced stages (III or IV). The major risk factors for ovarian cancer include older age, genetics, family history, hormone replacement therapy, nulliparity, and dietary fat. Controversial factors include obesity, infertility, talc powder, radiation exposure, fertility medications and in vitro fertilization. The current review discusses the aetiology, epidemiology and risk factors for ovarian cancer. Nevertheless, identification of the main risk factors for ovarian cancer may increase the awareness among women of the general population. This should help to decrease the incidence rate of ovarian cancer and increase the five-year survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aus Tariq Ali
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Osamah Al-ani
- Faculty of Medicine, Odessa National Medical University, Odessa, Ukraine
| | - Faisal Al-ani
- Faculty of Medicine, Odessa National Medical University, Odessa, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nash R, Johnson CE, Harris HR, Peres LC, Joslin CE, Bethea TN, Bandera EV, Ochs-Balcom HM, Myers ER, Guertin KA, Camacho F, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Moorman PG, Setiawan VW, Rosenberg L, Schildkraut JM, Wu AH. Race Differences in the Associations between Menstrual Cycle Characteristics and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1610-1620. [PMID: 35654411 PMCID: PMC9711941 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Menstrual cycle characteristics-including age at menarche and cycle length- have been associated with ovarian cancer risk in White women. However, the associations between menstrual cycle characteristics and ovarian cancer risk among Black women have been sparsely studied. METHODS Using the Ovarian Cancer in Women of African Ancestry (OCWAA) Consortium that includes 1,024 Black and 2,910 White women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and 2,325 Black and 7,549 White matched controls, we investigated associations between menstrual cycle characteristics (age at menarche, age at menstrual regularity, cycle length, and ever missing three periods) and EOC risk by race and menopausal status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Black women were more likely to be <11 years at menarche than White women (controls: 9.9% vs. 6.0%). Compared with ≥15 years at menarche, <11 years was associated with increased EOC risk for White (OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.99-1.57) but not Black women (OR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.80-1.55). Among White women only, the association was greater for premenopausal (OR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.31-3.68) than postmenopausal women (OR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.38). Irregular cycle length was inversely associated with risk for White (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99) but not Black women (OR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.68-1.66). CONCLUSIONS Earlier age at menarche and cycle irregularity are associated with increased EOC risk for White but not Black women. IMPACT Associations between menstrual cycle characteristics and EOC risk were not uniform by race.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Nash
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta GA
| | - Courtney E Johnson
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta GA
| | - Holly R. Harris
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Lauren C. Peres
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Charlotte E Joslin
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Medicine and Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Chicago, IL
| | - Traci N. Bethea
- Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Campus, Washington, DC
| | - Elisa V. Bandera
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Heather M. Ochs-Balcom
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
| | - Evan R. Myers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Kristin A Guertin
- Department of Population Health and Prevention Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Fabian Camacho
- Department of Population Health and Prevention Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Patricia G. Moorman
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Veronica Wendy Setiawan
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Lynn Rosenberg
- Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta GA
| | - Anna H. Wu
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guo JZ, Xiao Q, Gao S, Li XQ, Wu QJ, Gong TT. Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies on Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:681396. [PMID: 34458137 PMCID: PMC8385140 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.681396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the deadliest gynecological cancers worldwide. Previous observational epidemiological studies have revealed associations between modifiable environmental risk factors and OC risk. However, these studies are prone to confounding, measurement error, and reverse causation, undermining robust causal inference. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis has been established as a reliable method to investigate the causal relationship between risk factors and diseases using genetic variants to proxy modifiable exposures. Over recent years, MR analysis in OC research has received extensive attention, providing valuable insights into the etiology of OC as well as holding promise for identifying potential therapeutic interventions. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the key principles and assumptions of MR analysis. Published MR studies focusing on the causality between different risk factors and OC risk are summarized, along with comprehensive analysis of the method and its future applications. The results of MR studies on OC showed that higher BMI and height, earlier age at menarche, endometriosis, schizophrenia, and higher circulating β-carotene and circulating zinc levels are associated with an increased risk of OC. In contrast, polycystic ovary syndrome; vitiligo; higher circulating vitamin D, magnesium, and testosterone levels; and HMG-CoA reductase inhibition are associated with a reduced risk of OC. MR analysis presents a2 valuable approach to understanding the causality between different risk factors and OC after full consideration of its inherent assumptions and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Zeng Guo
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qian Xiao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Song Gao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiu-Qin Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qi-Jun Wu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ting-Ting Gong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eoh KJ, Park EY, Chang YJ, Ha HI, Hong J, Huang D, Nam EJ, Lim MC. The preventive effect of breastfeeding against ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:142-147. [PMID: 34304906 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A recent study showed that even a few months of breastfeeding is associated with a significant decrease in the risk of ovarian cancer in the general population. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the significance of the length of the breastfeeding period on ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched up to June 1, 2021. We included case-control and cohort studies that contained information on breastfeeding and the risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Odds ratios (OR) were meta-analytically pooled using a fixed-effects model.dd RESULTS: Five studies, including one cohort study and four case-control studies, were included in this meta-analysis. Of the 14,601 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, the overall pooled OR of ever having performed breastfeeding in patients who had ovarian cancer was 0.767 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.688-0.856) and 0.817 (95% CI, 0.650-1.028) for patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation, respectively. Breastfeeding for >1 year acted as a protective factor in both BRCA1 [OR: 0.787 (95% CI, 0.682-0.907)] and BRCA2 [OR: 0.567 (95% CI, 0.400-0.802)] mutation carriers. No significant heterogeneity was present (I2 = 0%), and the funnel plot was also properly distributed, showing no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS Breastfeeding is a preventive, modifiable factor for ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Ever having performed breastfeeding was significantly preventive for ovarian cancer in the BRCA1 mutation carriers, however a period of 1 year or more of breastfeeding is required for a reduced ovarian cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Jin Eoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Young Park
- Biostatistics Collaboration Team, Research Core Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Department of Statistics and Data Science, College of Commerce and Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Jung Chang
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Division of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeong In Ha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National school of medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Juhye Hong
- Division of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Dan Huang
- Division of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Ji Nam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Division of Tumor Immunology and Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alvi Q, Baloch GM, Chinna K, Dabbagh A. Lifestyle and reproductive health: the aetiology of ovarian cancer in Pakistan. F1000Res 2020; 9:901. [PMID: 32802322 PMCID: PMC7417955 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.24866.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a fatal gynaecological cancer and eighth most common cancer in women globally. Lifestyle, reproductive and sociodemographic factors are among the influential parameters that may significantly affect the risk of ovarian cancer and its mortality rate. However, the epidemiological investigations have shown that the risk of ovarian cancers associated with these factors is different in varied geographical distributions. Lifestyle and reproductive factors have not been investigated thoroughly across a wide cultural diversity. The objective of this study is to investigate the association of these factors with ovarian cancer in Pakistan. This investigation will focus on the lifestyle effects of fat intake, intake of tea, habitual exercise, use of talc, personal hygiene, habit of holding urine for long time, obesity on ovarian cancer among Pakistani women. Reproductive variables will include age at menarche, natural menopausal age, parity, nulliparity (miscarriages, abortion, stillbirths), infertility, fertility treatment, tubal ligation, oral contraceptive use, and family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Sociodemographic variables will include effect of age, income, education, and geographical location. A case-control study will be conducted in the major cancer hospitals of Pakistan and the patients will also be interviewed. The controls will be recruited outside the hospital. For controls the same age limit and residency requirements will be applied. The information gained from this research will be an important contribution to develop programs for health promotion, with a focus on ovarian cancer prevention and women's health. The findings could be used for health policies and planning to prevent ovarian cancer. The research will pave the way for a public policy and interventions to reduce the burden of ovarian cancer in Pakistan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qurratulann Alvi
- School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Kualalampur, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia
| | - Gul Muhammad Baloch
- School Of Medicine,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Kualalampur, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia
| | - Karuthan Chinna
- School Of Medicine,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Kualalampur, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia
| | - Ali Dabbagh
- School Of Medicine,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Kualalampur, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Babic A, Sasamoto N, Rosner BA, Tworoger SS, Jordan SJ, Risch HA, Harris HR, Rossing MA, Doherty JA, Fortner RT, Chang-Claude J, Goodman MT, Thompson PJ, Moysich KB, Ness RB, Kjaer SK, Jensen A, Schildkraut JM, Titus LJ, Cramer DW, Bandera EV, Qin B, Sieh W, McGuire V, Sutphen R, Pearce CL, Wu AH, Pike M, Webb PM, Modugno F, Terry KL. Association Between Breastfeeding and Ovarian Cancer Risk. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:e200421. [PMID: 32239218 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Importance Breastfeeding has been associated with a reduced risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in multiple studies, but others showed no association. Whether risk reduction extends beyond that provided by pregnancy alone or differs by histotype is unclear. Furthermore, the observed associations between duration and timing of breastfeeding with ovarian cancer risk have been inconsistent. Objective To determine the association between breastfeeding (ie, ever/never, duration, timing) and ovarian cancer risk overall and by histotype. Design, Setting, and Participants A pooled analysis of parous women with ovarian cancer and controls from 13 case-control studies participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium was performed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of the overall association were calculated using multivariable logistic regression and polytomous logistic regression for histotype-specific associations. All data were collected from individual sites from November 1989 to December 2009, and analysis took place from September 2017 to July 2019. Exposures Data on breastfeeding history, including duration per child breastfed, age at first and last breastfeeding, and years since last breastfeeding were collected by questionnaire or interview and was harmonized across studies. Main Outcomes and Measures Diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Results A total of 9973 women with ovarian cancer (mean [SD] age, 57.4 [11.1] years) and 13 843 controls (mean [SD] age, 56.4 [11.7] years) were included. Breastfeeding was associated with a 24% lower risk of invasive ovarian cancer (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.71-0.80). Independent of parity, ever having breastfed was associated with reduction in risk of all invasive ovarian cancers, particularly high-grade serous and endometrioid cancers. For a single breastfeeding episode, mean breastfeeding duration of 1 to 3 months was associated with 18% lower risk (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.88), and breastfeeding for 12 or more months was associated with a 34% lower risk (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75). More recent breastfeeding was associated with a reduction in risk (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47-0.66 for <10 years) that persisted for decades (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.90 for ≥30 years; P for trend = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Breastfeeding is associated with a significant decrease in risk of ovarian cancer overall and for the high-grade serous subtype, the most lethal type of ovarian cancer. The findings suggest that breastfeeding is a potentially modifiable factor that may lower risk of ovarian cancer independent of pregnancy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Babic
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Naoko Sasamoto
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bernard A Rosner
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Susan J Jordan
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,The University of Queensland School of Public Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Department of Population Health Science, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Community and Population Health Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Pamela J Thompson
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Roberta B Ness
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Rigshospitalet, Department of Gynaecology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Allan Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Linda J Titus
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Daniel W Cramer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Bo Qin
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Rebecca Sutphen
- Epidemiology Center, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Malcolm Pike
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Hillman Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Iversen L, Fielding S, Lidegaard Ø, Mørch LS, Skovlund CW, Hannaford PC. Association between contemporary hormonal contraception and ovarian cancer in women of reproductive age in Denmark: prospective, nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2018; 362:k3609. [PMID: 30257920 PMCID: PMC6283376 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k3609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the association between contemporary combined hormonal contraceptives (including progestogen types in combined preparations and all progestogen-only products) and overall and specific types of ovarian cancer. DESIGN Prospective, nationwide cohort study. SETTING Denmark, 1995-2014. PARTICIPANTS All women aged 15-49 years during 1995-2014 were eligible. Women were excluded if they immigrated after 1995, had cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer), had venous thrombosis, or were treated for infertility before entry (final study population included 1 879 227 women). Women were categorised as never users (no record of being dispensed hormonal contraception), current or recent users (≤1 year after stopping use), or former users (>1 year after stopping use) of different hormonal contraceptives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Poisson regression was used to calculate relative risk of ovarian cancer among users of any contemporary combined hormonal contraceptives and by progestogen type in combined preparations and all progestogen-only products, including non-oral preparations. Separate analyses examined women followed up to their first contraception type switch and those with full contraceptive histories. Duration, time since last use, and tumour histology were examined and the population prevented fraction were calculated. RESULTS During 21.4 million person years, 1249 incident ovarian cancers occurred. Among ever users of hormonal contraception, 478 ovarian cancers were recorded over 13 344 531 person years. Never users had 771 ovarian cancers during 8 150 250 person years. Compared with never users, reduced risks of ovarian cancer occurred with current or recent use and former use of any hormonal contraception (relative risk 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.68) and 0.77 (0.66 to 0.91), respectively). Relative risks among current or recent users decreased with increasing duration (from 0.82 (0.59 to 1.12) with ≤1 year use to 0.26 (0.16 to 0.43) with >10 years' use; P<0.001 for trend). Similar results were achieved among women followed up to their first switch in contraceptive type. Little evidence of major differences in risk estimates by tumour type or progestogen content of combined oral contraceptives was seen. Use of progestogen-only products were not associated with ovarian cancer risk. Among ever users of hormonal contraception, the reduction in the age standardised absolute rate of ovarian cancer was 3.2 per 100 000 person years. Based on the relative risk for the never use versus ever use categories of hormonal contraception (0.66), the population prevented fraction was estimated to be 21%-that is, use of hormonal contraception prevented 21% of ovarian cancers in the study population. CONCLUSIONS Use of contemporary combined hormonal contraceptives is associated with a reduction in ovarian cancer risk in women of reproductive age-an effect related to duration of use, which diminishes after stopping use. These data suggest no protective effect from progestogen-only products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Iversen
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Shona Fielding
- Medical Statistics Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Øjvind Lidegaard
- Rigshospitalet, Juliane Marie Centre, Department of Gynaecology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lina S Mørch
- Rigshospitalet, Juliane Marie Centre, Department of Gynaecology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Charlotte W Skovlund
- Rigshospitalet, Juliane Marie Centre, Department of Gynaecology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Philip C Hannaford
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Okumura T, Muronosono E, Tsubuku M, Terao Y, Takeda S, Maruyama M. Anaplastic carcinoma in ovarian seromucinous cystic tumor of borderline malignancy. J Ovarian Res 2018; 11:77. [PMID: 30176911 PMCID: PMC6120074 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-018-0449-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The mortality rate of ovarian cancer is the highest among all gynecological malignancies in Japan. Ovarian tumors are classified as benign, borderline malignant, or malignant. Anticipating the histological subtype with imaging only is often difficult because of several histological subtypes of epithelial ovarian tumors (such as serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell, and Brenner tumors). In addition, the majority of mucinous tumors in the ovary are metastatic. Furthermore, mucinous tumors belong to one of the two different subclasses (i.e., intestinal and seromucinous types). Ovarian seromucinous cystic tumors of borderline malignancy are infrequent and only rarely coexist with other malignant tumors. Case presentation We have reported a 53-year-old Japanese woman with anaplastic carcinoma in an ovarian seromucinous cystic tumor of borderline malignancy. Her MRI and CT analysis revealed an ovarian tumor with a mural nodule, ascites, and peritoneal dissemination. Enhanced MRI revealed that the mural nodule was enhanced. Enhanced CT analysis revealed that the lymph nodes were not swollen. Intriguingly, the mural nodule crossed the cyst wall into the cavity and onto the surface. Her laboratory data revealed high serum CA 125 level. Cumulatively, these results suggested ovarian malignancy. The patient underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and resection of the disseminated lesions. Lymph node biopsy was omitted because of the suggestion of enhanced CT image findings and palpation during surgery. Her postoperative specimen examination determined FIGO at least stage IIIB, and accordingly, adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed. After 3 years of the operation, the patient is presently alive without clinical tumor recurrences. Conclusion Imaging studies with pathognomonic findings contributed to ovarian cancer diagnosis in this case. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in English literature to report detailed classification of mucinous borderline malignancy, seromucinous cystic, and anaplastic carcinoma in an ovarian seromucinous cystic tumor of borderline malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maruyama Memorial General Hospital, 2-10-5 Motomachi, Iwatukiku, Saitamashi, Saitama, 339-8521, Japan. .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Etuo Muronosono
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maruyama Memorial General Hospital, 2-10-5 Motomachi, Iwatukiku, Saitamashi, Saitama, 339-8521, Japan
| | - Masahiko Tsubuku
- Department of Radiology, Maruyama Memorial General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Terao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoru Takeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanori Maruyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maruyama Memorial General Hospital, 2-10-5 Motomachi, Iwatukiku, Saitamashi, Saitama, 339-8521, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
You W, Symonds I, Henneberg M. Low fertility may be a significant determinant of ovarian cancer worldwide: an ecological analysis of cross- sectional data from 182 countries. J Ovarian Res 2018; 11:68. [PMID: 30115095 PMCID: PMC6097201 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-018-0441-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ageing, socioeconomic level, obesity, fertility, relaxed natural selection and urbanization have been postulated as the risk factors of ovarian cancer (OC56). We sought to identify which factor plays the most significant role in predicting OC56 incidence rate worldwide. METHODS Bivariate correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationships between country-specific estimates of ageing (measured by life expectancy), GDP PPP (Purchasing power parity), obesity prevalence, fertility (indexed by the crude birth rate), opportunity for natural selection (Ibs) and urbanization. Partial correlation was used to compare contribution of different variables. Fisher A-to-Z was used to compare the correlation coefficients. Multiple linear regression (Enter and Stepwise) was conducted to identify significant determinants of OC56 incidence. ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni analysis was performed to compare differences between the means of OC56 incidence rate and residuals of OC56 standardised on fertility and GDP respectively between the six WHO regions. RESULTS Bivariate analyses revealed that OC56 was significantly and strongly correlated to ageing, GDP, obesity, low fertility, Ibs and urbanization. However, partial correlation analysis identified that fertility and ageing were the only variables that had a significant correlation to OC56 incidence when the other five variables were kept statistically constant. Fisher A-to-Z revealed that OC56 had a significantly stronger correlation to low fertility than to ageing. Stepwise linear regression analysis only identified fertility as the significant predictor of OC56. ANOVA showed that, between the six WHO regions, multiple mean differences of OC56 incidence were significant, but all disappeared when the contributing effect of fertility on OC56 incidence rate was removed. CONCLUSIONS Low fertility may be the most significant determining predictor of OC56 incidence worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenpeng You
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Ian Symonds
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Maciej Henneberg
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA Australia
- Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zürich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Doherty JA, Jensen A, Kelemen LE, Pearce CL, Poole E, Schildkraut JM, Terry KL, Tworoger SS, Webb PM, Wentzensen N. Current Gaps in Ovarian Cancer Epidemiology: The Need for New Population-Based Research. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109:3847624. [PMID: 29117355 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
With recent ovarian cancer screening studies showing no clinically significant mortality benefit, preventing this disease, identifying high-risk populations, and extending survival remain priorities. However, several challenges are impeding progress in ovarian cancer research. With most studies capturing exposure information from 10 or more years ago, evaluation of how changing patterns of exposures, such as new oral contraceptive formulations and increased intrauterine device use, might influence ovarian cancer risk and survival is difficult. Risk factors for ovarian cancer should be evaluated in the context of tumor histotypes, which have unique molecular features and cells of origin; this is a task that requires large collaborative studies to achieve meaningful sample sizes. Importantly, identification of novel modifiable risk factors, in addition to those currently known to reduce risk (eg, childbearing, tubal ligation, oral contraceptive use), is needed; this is not feasibly implemented at a population level. In this Commentary, we describe important gaps in knowledge and propose new approaches to advance epidemiologic research to improve ovarian cancer prevention and survival, including updated classification of tumors, collection of data on changing and novel exposures, longer follow-up on existing studies, evaluation of diverse populations, development of better risk prediction models, and collaborating prospectively with consortia to develop protocols for new studies that will allow seamless integration for future pooled analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Allan Jensen
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Elizabeth Poole
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Srivastava SK, Ahmad A, Miree O, Patel GK, Singh S, Rocconi RP, Singh AP. Racial health disparities in ovarian cancer: not just black and white. J Ovarian Res 2017; 10:58. [PMID: 28931403 PMCID: PMC5607508 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-017-0355-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, which disproportionately affects African American (AA) women. Lack of awareness and socioeconomic factors are considered important players in OC racial health disparity, while at the same time, some recent studies have brought focus on the genetic basis of disparity as well. Differential polymorphisms, mutations and expressions of genes have been reported in OC patients of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. Combined, it appears that neither genetic nor the socioeconomic factors alone might explain the observed racially disparate health outcomes among OC patients. Rather, a more logical explanation would be the one that takes into consideration the combination and/or the interplay of these factors, perhaps even including some environmental ones. Hence, in this article, we attempt to review the available information on OC racial health disparity, and provide an overview of socioeconomic, environmental and genetic factors, as well as the epigenetic changes that can act as a liaison between the three. A better understanding of these underlying causes will help further research on effective cancer management among diverse patient population and ultimately narrow health disparity gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeev K Srivastava
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604-1405, USA. .,Division of Cell Biology and Genetics, Tatva Biosciences, Coastal Innovation Hub, 600 Clinic Drive, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
| | - Aamir Ahmad
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604-1405, USA
| | - Orlandric Miree
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604-1405, USA
| | - Girijesh Kumar Patel
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604-1405, USA
| | - Seema Singh
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604-1405, USA.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA
| | - Rodney P Rocconi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA
| | - Ajay P Singh
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604-1405, USA. .,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shen F, Chen S, Gao Y, Dai X, Chen Q. The prevalence of malignant and borderline ovarian cancer in pre- and post-menopausal Chinese women. Oncotarget 2017; 8:80589-80594. [PMID: 29113327 PMCID: PMC5655222 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of ovarian cancer depends on the ethnicity and geographical area. Menopausal status is a well-known risk factor for ovarian cancer and most cases occur after menopause in Caucasians. However, it is less clear how the status of menopause or age at diagnosis is associated with ovarian cancer including its subtypes in Chinese women. Data on 1,283 women with primary malignant or borderline ovarian cancer including age at diagnosis, age at menopause and histology from the largest women's hospital in China was analysed. The median age at diagnosis was 53, 44 and 23 years for epithelial ovarian cancer or sex-cord tumors or germ cell tumors respectively. 58% of epithelial ovarian cancers were diagnosed after menopause, while 58% and 95% of sex-cord tumors and germ cell tumors were diagnosed before menopause. Around 60% of serous, endometrioid and clear-cell carcinoma of epithelial ovarian cancer were diagnosed after menopause, while 23% of mucinous carcinoma was diagnosed after menopause. The median age at diagnosis was 35 years for borderline ovarian cancer and 80% of patients were diagnosed before menopause. Our data demonstrates that the median age at diagnosis of ovarian cancer is younger in our study population than Caucasians reported in the literature regardless of malignant or borderline ovarian cancers, and regardless of subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. The prevalence of ovarian cancer is proportionately higher in our study population before menopause than Caucasians. Our results suggest clinicians to be more aware of the symptoms of ovarian cancer in premenopausal Chinese women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Shen
- The Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fudan University, China
| | - Shouzhen Chen
- The Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fudan University, China
| | - Yifei Gao
- The Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fudan University, China
| | - Xujing Dai
- The Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fudan University, China
| | - Qi Chen
- The Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fudan University, China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Reid BM, Permuth JB, Sellers TA. Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review. Cancer Biol Med 2017. [PMID: 28443200 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0084]+[] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the seventh most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in the world and the tenth most common in China. Epithelial OC is the most predominant pathologic subtype, with five major histotypes that differ in origination, pathogenesis, molecular alterations, risk factors, and prognosis. Genetic susceptibility is manifested by rare inherited mutations with high to moderate penetrance. Genome-wide association studies have additionally identified 29 common susceptibility alleles for OC, including 14 subtype-specific alleles. Several reproductive and hormonal factors may lower risk, including parity, oral contraceptive use, and lactation, while others such as older age at menopause and hormone replacement therapy confer increased risks. These associations differ by histotype, especially for mucinous OC, likely reflecting differences in etiology. Endometrioid and clear cell OC share a similar, unique pattern of associations with increased risks among women with endometriosis and decreased risks associated with tubal ligation. OC risks associated with other gynecological conditions and procedures, such as hysterectomy, pelvic inflammatory disease, and polycystic ovarian syndrome, are less clear. Other possible risk factors include environmental and lifestyle factors such as asbestos and talc powder exposures, and cigarette smoking. The epidemiology provides clues on etiology, primary prevention, early detection, and possibly even therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett M Reid
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa 33612, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer B Permuth
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa 33612, FL, USA
| | - Thomas A Sellers
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa 33612, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the seventh most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in the world and the tenth most common in China. Epithelial OC is the most predominant pathologic subtype, with five major histotypes that differ in origination, pathogenesis, molecular alterations, risk factors, and prognosis. Genetic susceptibility is manifested by rare inherited mutations with high to moderate penetrance. Genome-wide association studies have additionally identified 29 common susceptibility alleles for OC, including 14 subtype-specific alleles. Several reproductive and hormonal factors may lower risk, including parity, oral contraceptive use, and lactation, while others such as older age at menopause and hormone replacement therapy confer increased risks. These associations differ by histotype, especially for mucinous OC, likely reflecting differences in etiology. Endometrioid and clear cell OC share a similar, unique pattern of associations with increased risks among women with endometriosis and decreased risks associated with tubal ligation. OC risks associated with other gynecological conditions and procedures, such as hysterectomy, pelvic inflammatory disease, and polycystic ovarian syndrome, are less clear. Other possible risk factors include environmental and lifestyle factors such as asbestos and talc powder exposures, and cigarette smoking. The epidemiology provides clues on etiology, primary prevention, early detection, and possibly even therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett M Reid
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa 33612, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer B Permuth
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa 33612, FL, USA
| | - Thomas A Sellers
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa 33612, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the seventh most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in the world and the tenth most common in China. Epithelial OC is the most predominant pathologic subtype, with five major histotypes that differ in origination, pathogenesis, molecular alterations, risk factors, and prognosis. Genetic susceptibility is manifested by rare inherited mutations with high to moderate penetrance. Genome-wide association studies have additionally identified 29 common susceptibility alleles for OC, including 14 subtype-specific alleles. Several reproductive and hormonal factors may lower risk, including parity, oral contraceptive use, and lactation, while others such as older age at menopause and hormone replacement therapy confer increased risks. These associations differ by histotype, especially for mucinous OC, likely reflecting differences in etiology. Endometrioid and clear cell OC share a similar, unique pattern of associations with increased risks among women with endometriosis and decreased risks associated with tubal ligation. OC risks associated with other gynecological conditions and procedures, such as hysterectomy, pelvic inflammatory disease, and polycystic ovarian syndrome, are less clear. Other possible risk factors include environmental and lifestyle factors such as asbestos and talc powder exposures, and cigarette smoking. The epidemiology provides clues on etiology, primary prevention, early detection, and possibly even therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett M Reid
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa 33612, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer B Permuth
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa 33612, FL, USA
| | - Thomas A Sellers
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa 33612, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
A prospective study of reproductive factors and exogenous hormone use in relation to ovarian cancer risk among Black women. Cancer Causes Control 2016; 28:385-391. [PMID: 28025764 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-016-0840-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Extensive data in White women have linked oral contraceptive use, tubal ligation, and parity to reduced risk of ovarian cancer; results on postmenopausal female hormone use are mixed. Few studies, all of which are case-control studies, have been undertaken among Black women. The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess associations of reproductive factors and exogenous hormones with ovarian cancer among Black women. METHODS During follow-up from 1995 to 2013 in the Black Women's Health Study, a prospective cohort study, 115 incident cases of ovarian cancer were identified. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relation of the factors of interest to risk of ovarian cancer, with control for covariates. RESULT Oral contraceptive use was inversely associated with ovarian cancer risk: The HR for ≥10 years of use relative to <1 year was 0.50 (95% CI 0.30-0.98). For postmenopausal female hormone use, the HRs for ever use of estrogen with progestin and of estrogen alone were 1.37 (0.73-2.55) and 1.66 (0.90-3.07), respectively. The HRs for parity and tubal ligation were below 1.0, but were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Overall, the findings indicate that the relation of reproductive factors and exogenous hormone use to risk of ovarian cancer is similar among Black and White women. The results on estrogen-only supplements and estrogen with progestin supplements add to evidence from Whites, indicating that use of hormone supplements may be associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|