Psoriasis secundaria al tratamiento con infliximab y adalimumab en la enfermedad de Crohn

Paradoxical Psoriasiform Eruptions in Children Receiving Tumor Necrosis Factor α Inhibitors

Importance

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) inhibitor-induced psoriasiform eruption is well recognized in adults, but few reports document this paradoxical effect in children.

Objective

To characterize the clinical features and the clinical time course of TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasiform eruptions in children.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A multicenter retrospective case series of children younger than 18 years seen between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016, who developed a new-onset psoriasiform eruption while taking a TNF inhibitor for a nondermatologic disorder. Participating sites were members of the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance. Data were entered into a Research Electronic Data Capture database at the Mayo Clinic (ie, the coordinating center).

Results

Psoriasiform eruptions were identified in 103 TNF inhibitor-treated patients (median age, 13.8 years [IQR, 11.7-16.4 years]; 52 female patients [50%]; 57 White patients [55%]), with 67 patients (65%) treated with infliximab, 35 (34%) with adalimumab, and 1 (1%) with certolizumab pegol. Most patients had no personal history (101 [98%]) or family history of psoriasis (60 patients [58%]). Inflammatory bowel disease was the most common indication for treatment with TNF inhibitor (94 patients [91%]). The primary extracutaneous disease was under control in 95 patients (92%) who developed the eruption. Most patients (n = 85 [83%]) developed psoriasiform eruptions at multiple anatomic sites, with scalp involvement being most common (65 patients [63%]). Skin disease developed at a median of 14.5 months (IQR, 9-24 months) after TNF inhibitor initiation. To treat the psoriasiform eruption, topical steroidal and nonsteroidal medication was prescribed for all patients. Systemic therapy was added for 30 patients (29%): methotrexate for 24 patients (23%), oral corticosteroids for 8 patients (8%), and azathioprine for 1 patient (1%). For 26 patients (25%), suboptimal effectiveness with topical medications alone prompted discontinuation of the initial TNF inhibitor and a change to a second-line TNF inhibitor with cutaneous improvement in 23 patients (88%) by a median of 3 months (IQR, 2-4 months). Eight patients (31%) who started a second-line TNF inhibitor developed a subsequent TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasiform eruption at a median of 6 months (IQR, 4-8 months). Persistent skin disease in 18 patients (17%) prompted discontinuation of all TNF inhibitors; 11 patients changed to a non-TNF inhibitor systemic therapy, and 7 discontinued all systemic therapy.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this case series, paradoxical TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasiform eruptions were seen in children treated with TNF inhibitors for any indication, and there appears to be a class effect among the varying TNF inhibitors. The majority of these children were able to continue TNF inhibitor therapy with adequate skin-directed and other adjuvant therapies.

Psoriasis Associated With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Children With Inflammatory Diseases

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence rate (IR) of psoriasis in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and chronic noninfectious osteomyelitis (CNO) with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) exposure as compared to children without TNFi exposure and to the general pediatric population.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of children with IBD, JIA, or CNO from 2008 to 2018. TNFi exposure was defined as a prescription for adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab, or golimumab, and the primary outcome was incident psoriasis. IRs and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of psoriasis with TNFi exposure and other risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the 4,111 children who met inclusion criteria, 1,614 (39%) had TNFi exposure and 2,497 (61%) did not, with 4,705 and 6,604 person-years of follow-up, respectively. There were 58 cases (IR 12.3 per 1,000 person-years) and 25 cases (IR 3.8 per 1,000 person-years) of psoriasis in children with and without TNFi exposure, respectively. The SIR was 18 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 15-22) overall, 30 (95% CI 23-39) for children with TNFi exposure, and 9.3 (95% CI 6.3-14) for children without TNFi exposure. The hazard ratio of psoriasis comparing TNFi exposure to no TNFi exposure was 3.84 (95% CI 2.28-6.47; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Children with IBD, JIA, and CNO had an increased rate of psoriasis compared to the general pediatric population, with the highest rate in those with TNFi exposure.

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor-induced psoriasis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The development of psoriasis while on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) is a paradoxical effect of agents that treat psoriasis. There is a paucity of data available on this entity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of TNFi-induced psoriasis in patients with JIA at two pediatric centers, and psoriasis response to therapeutic modifications.

METHODS

We performed retrospective chart review on patients with JIA treated with TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab) who developed psoriasis. TNFi-induced psoriasis was defined as an incident diagnosis of psoriasis after starting a TNFi. Patients with personal histories of psoriasis prior to TNFi therapy were excluded. Following diagnosis, responses to medication changes were defined based on physician assessments.

RESULTS

Nine of 166 (5.4%) patients on TNFi for JIA were diagnosed with TNFi-induced psoriasis. All cases were female. One had a family history of psoriasis. The median age was 10 (range 2-16) years. Five (55%) patients experienced scalp psoriasis, including four (44%) with alopecia. Two (22%) patients achieved significant improvement after switching to different classes of biologic agents, while three (33%) patients had significant improvement following discontinuation of biologic therapy. One of five patients who switched to a different TNFi had complete resolution, while four had worsening symptoms or partial improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate the prevalence of TNFi-induced psoriasis in JIA at two centers. Though larger studies are needed, our data suggest discontinuation of TNFi or biologic class switching should be considered as treatment strategies in select patients.

Risks associated with use of TNF inhibitors in children with rheumatic diseases

Introduction: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of many inflammatory diseases. Several drugs blocking TNF-α are employed in clinical practice in pediatrics. Given their action on the immune system, TNF-α inhibitors have raised concerns on their safety profile since their introduction. A broad spectrum of side effects related to TNF inhibition has been reported: immunogenicity, infectious diseases, malignancies, and others. Areas covered: In order to assess the risk related to the use of anti-TNF-α agents in children with rheumatic diseases we analyzed data obtained from retrospective and prospective safety studies, case reports and case series, and controlled trials. Expert commentary: Anti-TNF-α agents have shown a remarkably good safety profile in the pediatric population so far. However, there are lots of questions to be answered and maintaining active surveillance on these drugs is necessary in order to not overlook any possible unexpected adverse effects.

Onset of psoriasis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with anti-TNF agents

Anti-TNF agents are widely used in the treatment of some inflammatory diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis. Their use has led to a significant advance in the treatment of these diseases. Paradoxically, the onset of psoriatic lesions has been observed in patients on anti-TNF treatment. The cause of this side effect has not yet been clearly identified. In recent years, an increasing number of cases of psoriasis related to anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients have been reported. Although withdrawal of anti-TNF was usually implemented in the first reports, in more recent series the maintenance of the drug with topical therapy, with the exception of the most severe or extensive forms of skin lesions, appears to be the treatment of choice. This article summarizes the relevant literature, discusses the etiopathology, epidemiology, location and phenotypes of psoriatic lesions and the management of this side effect.

Psoriasis and psoriasiform lesions induced by TNFα antagonists: the experience of a tertiary care hospital from northern Spain

The aim of this study was to investigate the cumulated incidence and clinical characteristics of the psoriasiform lesions seen in a wide cohort of rheumatic patients exposed to anti-TNFα drugs in a tertiary care hospital from northern Spain. The study population included 450 patients exposed to anti-TNFα agents from 2001 to 2007 and treated in a university hospital in northern Spain. Two hundred patients were exposed to infliximab (44%), 129 (29%) to etanercept, and 121 (27%) to adalimumab. The cumulated incidence (CI) of this skin reaction was calculated for each of the three agents studied. Psoriasis and psoriasiform lesions were documented in 7 patients diagnosed with different rheumatic inflammatory conditions (1.56%). Cases of this adverse effect were identified with all three anti-TNFα agents available at that time, but less frequently with infliximab (CI: 0.5%) compared with etanercept (CI: 2.3%) or adalimumab (CI: 2.5%). The most common lesion was palmoplantar pustulosis (71.3% of the cases), and the latency period to the development of the lesions ranged from 4 to 38 months (mean 9 months). In four of the 7 patients, treatment was suspended, while in the remaining three patients treatment was continued. The CI of this skin reaction in our setting is similar to that published by others. Infliximab was found to be less frequently associated with this adverse event. In our experience, it is not always necessary to stop anti-TNFα therapy for the skin lesions to improve.

Frequency, phenotype, outcome, and therapeutic impact of skin reactions following initiation of adalimumab therapy: experience from a consecutive cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients

BACKGROUND

The monoclonal anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody adalimumab has recently been approved for Crohn's disease (CD) and evaluated for ulcerative colitis (UC). Cutaneous lesions associated with its administration have not been prospectively studied in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

We evaluated the first 50 consecutive patients (female n = 30, median age 32½ years, interquartile range [IQR 27-46]) with CD (n = 46) and UC (n = 4) who received adalimumab (82% induction with 160/80 and 94% maintenance with 40 mg subcutaneously biweekly) at our center and were followed up for a median of 17 months [IQR 12-21]. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate skin reaction free survival (SRFS) and Fisher's exact test to examine contingency between demographic variables and outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-two percent of all patients developed a dermatological reaction (eczema [n = 9], acne-like dermatitis [n = 9], psoriasis-like lesions [n = 6], localized erythema and swelling at injection site [n = 1], dermatitis sicca [n = 1], rosacea [n = 1], prurigo simplex [n = 1], tinea [n = 1], localized herpes simplex [n = 1], and candida [n = 1] infections) that resolved in 12% at follow-up. SRFS was 12 months [IQR 30-5]. Adalimumab was discontinued in 22% of all patients. Longer disease duration, a lower dose induction schedule, as well as concomitant use of steroids or immunosuppressants were more often associated with an unfavorable skin outcome. Skin outcomes differed significantly between patients who saw a dermatologist (P = 0.022) and/or had a dermatological intervention (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

A broad spectrum of adverse cutaneous reactions occurs more frequently and later in adalimumab therapy for IBD compared with other indications. Consultation with a dermatologist is highly recommended.

Psoriatic skin lesions induced by tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy: clinical features and possible immunopathogenesis

OBJECTIVE

The induction or exacerbation of psoriasis in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists is a well-established phenomenon. The goals of this comprehensive literature analysis were to update currently available data regarding this adverse event, to identify any clinical patterns in the cohort of reported patients, and to review the possible immunopathogenesis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed utilizing PubMed and Medline databases (1996 to August 2009) searching the index terms "tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor," "TNF," "infliximab," "etanercept," "adalimumab," combined with the terms "psoriasis," "pustular," "skin," "rash," "palmoplantar," and "paradoxical." All relevant articles were reviewed. Patients who did not appear to meet accepted classification criteria for their treated disease, who had a more probable explanation or other likely diagnosis for their skin findings or known possible triggering factor for the skin eruption, including infection, were excluded from this analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred seven cases met inclusion criteria for review. Of these, 43% were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, 26% with seronegative spondyloarthropathy, and 20% with inflammatory bowel disease. Mean patient age was 45 years and 65% were female. Fifty-nine percent were being treated with infliximab, 22% with adalimumab, and 19% with etanercept. Lesion morphology included pustular psoriasis in 56%, plaque psoriasis in 50%, and guttate lesions in 12%; 15% experienced lesions of more than 1 type. No statistically significant predisposing factors for the development of new-onset psoriasis were found. Sixty-six percent of patients were able to continue TNF antagonist therapy with psoriasis treatments. The pathogenesis appears to involve disruption of the cytokine milieu with production of unopposed interferon-α production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells in genetically predisposed individuals. Genetic polymorphisms may play a role in this paradoxical reaction to TNF blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

TNF antagonist induced psoriasis is a well-described adverse event without any known predisposing risk factors. Most patients can be managed conservatively without drug withdrawal. Registry data reporting is necessary to define the true incidence and prevalence of this condition. Genomic studies of affected patients may assist with identification of predisposed patients and elucidation of the molecular trigger of this perplexing response.