Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of the combination of etravirine plus raltegravir as novel dual antiretroviral maintenance regimen in HIV-infected patients

Extractive determination study of Etravirine by using Tpooo as an Analytical reagent in Pure and Pharmaceutical dosage forms

This study developed a sensitive and straightforward extractive spectroscopic method to estimate Etravirine (ETR) using TPooo as an analytical reagent in pure and pharmaceutical dosage forms. This method was achieved based on the extractable chloroform complex formed with Tropeoline ooo (TPooo) in an acidic media. Following Beer’s law, the extractable complex showed the absorbance maximum at 485nm at the concentration ranges between 12.5-75 µg/ml with the molar absorptivity 2.195 x 103 L/mole /cm and the Sandell’s sensitivity 0.1549 µg cm-2. The result of Etravirine estimation for the present method has been validated statistically by recovery studies, and the developed method was simple, sensitive, accurate, and precise. It was validated following International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines and also successfully applied for the estimation of Etravirine in tablet dosage forms.

Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Join Forces with Integrase Inhibitors to Combat HIV

In the treatment of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), the diarylpyrimidine (DAPY) analogs etravirine (ETR) and rilpivirine (RPV) have been widely effective against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) variants that are resistant to other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). With non-inferior or improved efficacy, better safety profiles, and lower doses or pill burdens than other NNRTIs in the clinic, combination therapies including either of these two drugs have led to higher adherence than other NNRTI-containing treatments. In a separate development, HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) have shown efficacy in treating AIDS, including raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), cabotegravir (CAB), bictegravir (BIC), and dolutegravir (DTG). Of these, DTG and BIC perform better against a wide range of resistance mutations than other INSTIs. Nevertheless, drug-resistant combinations of mutations have begun to emerge against all DAPYs and INSTIs, attributable in part to non-adherence. New dual therapies that may promote better adherence combine ETR or RPV with an INSTI and have been safer and non-inferior to more traditional triple-drug treatments. Long-acting dual- and triple-therapies combining ETR or RPV with INSTIs are under study and may further improve adherence. Here, highly resistant emergent mutations and efficacy data on these novel treatments are reviewed. Overall, ETR or RPV, in combination with INSTIs, may be treatments of choice as long-term maintenance therapies that optimize efficacy, adherence, and safety.

Impact of the mutational load on the virological response to a first-line rilpivirine-based regimen

OBJECTIVES

To determine how the load of rilpivirine-resistant variants (mutational load) influences the virological response (VR) of HIV-1-infected patients to a rilpivirine-based first-line regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred and eighty-nine patients infected with HIV-1 whose reverse transcriptase gene had been successfully resistance genotyped using next-generation sequencing were given a first-line regimen containing rilpivirine. Variables associated with the VR at 12 months were identified using a logistic model. The results were used to build a multivariate model for each mutational load threshold and the R2 variations were analysed to identify the mutational load threshold that best predicted the VR.

RESULTS

The mutational load at baseline was the only variable linked to the VR at 12 months (P  < 0.01). The VR at 12 months decreased from 96.9% to 83.4% when the mutational load was >1700 copies/mL and to 50% when the mutational load was > 9000 copies/mL. The threshold of 9000 copies/mL was associated with the VR at 12 months with an OR of 36.7 (95% CI 4.7-285.1). The threshold of 1700 copies/mL was associated with the VR at 12 months with an OR of 7.2 (95% CI 1.4-36.8).

CONCLUSIONS

There is quantifiable evidence that determining a mutational load threshold can be used to identify those patients on a first-line regimen containing rilpivirine who are at risk of virological failure. The clinical management of HIV-infected patients can be improved by evaluating the frequency of mutant variants at a threshold of < 20% together with the plasma HIV-1 viral load at the time of resistance genotyping.

Maintenance of Viral Suppression after Optimization Therapy from Etravirine Plus Raltegravir to Rilpivirine Plus Dolutegravir in HIV-1-Infected Patients

Non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor plus integrase strand transfer inhibitor–based dual therapies are an attractive simplification, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing strategy for experienced human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Thus, we performed a 24-week real-life observational study to assess efficacy and safety of switching from raltegravir plus etravirine to dolutegravir plus rilpivirine in 7 previously heavily treated patients. This simplification strategy reduced pill burden and preserved viral suppression in treatment-experienced patients with no major mutations to rilpivirine at historical genotyping.

Two-drug regimens for treatment of naïve HIV-1 infection and as maintenance therapy

As people live longer with HIV infection, there has been a resurgence of interest in challenging the use of three-drug therapy, including two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus a third drug, as initial treatment of HIV infection or for maintenance therapy in virologically suppressed individuals. Although initial studies showed poor efficacy and/or substantial toxicity, more recent regimens have held greater promise. The SWORD-1 and -2 studies were pivotal trials of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine as maintenance therapy in virologically suppressed patients with no history of drug resistance, leading to the US Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the regimen as a small, single tablet. More recently, the GEMINI-1 and -2 studies demonstrated that dolutegravir plus lamivudine is as safe and effective as the same regimen when combined with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naïve individuals. Together, these and other studies of novel two-drug regimens offer the potential for improved tolerability and simplicity, as well as a reduction in cost. We will review historical and recent trials of two-drug therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection.

Dolutegravir and rilpivirine for the maintenance treatment of virologically suppressed HIV-1 infection

INTRODUCTION

Triple combinations of antiretroviral therapy (ART) drugs are the standard treatment for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, but the challenges include long-term side effects, high costs, and adherence. The recent advent of potent and well-tolerated ART has renewed the interest for newer ART strategies. A dual regimen with the combination of dolutegravir (DTG) and rilpivirine (RPV), two well-tolerated, metabolic-friendly, and potent drugs could offer additional benefits. Areas covered: A review of recent randomized trials and observational cohorts concerning the use of a dual therapy with DTG plus RPV as a switching strategy in patients with viral suppression. Expert commentary: Currently, data of more of 900 patients switched to this dual regimen are available. This combination shows a high rate of virological suppression, above 90% at 48 weeks, few discontinuations due to adverse events, improvement in bone and kidney parameters for patients discontinuing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lack of loss of the inflammatory control achieved with triple therapy, and a neutral effect on lipid parameters. Thus, for the first time, a dual regimen without protease inhibitors is effective, avoiding metabolic side effects and drug interactions. Longer follow-up is needed, but this dual regimen appears as a promising strategy for aging HIV-infected patients.

Dual Raltegravir-Etravirine Combination as Maintenance Regimen in Virologically Suppressed HIV-1-Infected Patients

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)- and protease inhibitor (PI)-sparing antiretroviral regimens may be useful in selected human immune deficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with resistance or intolerance to these drug classes. This was an observational prospective study of patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy containing two NRTIs plus one ritonavir-boosted PI who switched to a dual regimen containing raltegravir plus etravirine. Patients were required not to have prior virological failure to raltegravir and to have efficacy of etravirine shown through the genotypic resistance assay in case of prior non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) virological failure. As a whole, 38 patients were enrolled. The mean duration of current regimen was 4.3 years, and the reason for simplification was toxicity in 29 patients and resistance to NRTIs in 9 patients. After switching, the percentage of patients with HIV RNA <20 copies/ml at week 48 was 81.6% in the intent-to-treat-exposed analysis. The switch led to a significant reduction in the mean serum triglyceride levels (-81.2 mg/dl), in the mean total cholesterol levels (-44.3 mg/dl), and in the prevalence of tubular proteinuria (-30.2%), with a significant increase in the mean phosphoremia (+0.52 mg/dl) and in both mean lumbar and femoral neck bone mineral density (+6.5% and +4.7%, respectively). Two patients (5.2%) had virological failure due to suboptimal adherence, and five subjects (13.1%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. In our study, simplification to the dual-therapy raltegravir plus etravirine was associated with a good efficacy and tolerability, in addition to a favorable effect on kidney, bone, and serum lipids.

Development and validation of a liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method for the multiplexed quantification of etravirine, maraviroc, raltegravir, and rilpivirine in human plasma and tissue

BACKGROUND

Analytical methodologies for antiretroviral (ARV) quantification are important in determining both systemic and localized drug concentrations. The CCR5-antagonist maraviroc (MVC), the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) etravirine (ETV) and rilpivirine (RPV), as well as the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) raltegravir (RAL), have all been evaluated using both oral and non-oral dosing regimens, demonstrating a need for dynamic and sensitive bioanalytical tools for drug quantification in plasma and tissue.

METHODS

K₂EDTA plasma or blank luminal tissue lysate were spiked with ETV, MVC, RAL, and RPV. Following the addition of isotopically-labeled internal standards and sample extraction via protein precipitation or solid phase extraction, respectively, samples were subjected to liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) analysis. Chromatographic separation was performed using a Waters BEH C8, 50×2.1mm, 1.7μm particle size column, and detected on an API 5000 mass analyzer operated in selective reaction monitoring mode. The method was validated according to FDA Bioanalytical Method Validation guidelines.

RESULTS

Analytical methods were optimized for the multiplexed monitoring of ETV, MVC, RAL, and RPV in plasma and homogenized tissue lysate. The lower limits of quantification (LLOQs) for ETV, RAL, and RPV were 1ng/mL and the LLOQ for MVC was 0.1ng/mL in plasma; the LLOQs for all ARVs in homogenized tissue lysate was 0.05ng/sample. Standard curves were generated via weighted quadratic (plasma) or linear (tissue) regression of calibrators. Intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy studies demonstrated %CVs≤15.93% and %DEVs ≤±13.52%, respectively. Stability and matrix effects studies, as well as external proficiency testing assessment, were also performed. All results were acceptable and in accordance with the guidelines recommended by the FDA, Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation document.

CONCLUSIONS

LC-MS/MS assays that are sensitive, specific, and dynamic have been developed and validated for the multiplexed quantification of ETV, MVC, RAL, and RPV in plasma and homogenized tissue lysate. The described methods meet sufficient throughput criteria to support large research trials.

Dutrebis (lamivudine and raltegravir) for use in combination with other antiretroviral products for the treatment of HIV-1 infection

Raltegravir and lamivudine have been part of highly active therapy regimens throughout the past years of antiretroviral therapy. A fixed-dose, single-tablet regimen comprising a non-poloxamer formulation of the integrase inhibitor raltegravir and the transcriptase inhibitor lamivudine (raltegravir/lamivudine; Dutrebis(®)) has been recently licensed for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. In several Phase I pharmacokinetic studies, one Dutrebis (150 mg lamivudine/300 mg raltegravir) fixed-dose combination tablet showed a higher bioavailability but comparable lamivudine and 400 mg raltegravir poloxamer exposures. Thus, the co-administration of raltegravir together with lamivudine created a potent, effective, well-tolerated antiretroviral combination, which could be more convenient for the patient. However, the disadvantage of twice a day administration, and the existence of other fixed-dose combinations limit its widespread clinical use. This article reviews pharmacokinetics data and appraises their potential use in current and future HIV therapy.

Maraviroc, as a Switch Option, in HIV-1-infected Individuals With Stable, Well-controlled HIV Replication and R5-tropic Virus on Their First Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Plus Ritonavir-boosted Protease Inhibitor Regimen: Week 48 Results of the Randomized, Multicenter MARCH Study

BACKGROUND

Alternative combination antiretroviral therapies in virologically suppressed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients experiencing side effects and/or at ongoing risk of important comorbidities from current therapy are needed. Maraviroc (MVC), a chemokine receptor 5 antagonist, is a potential alternative component of therapy in those with R5-tropic virus.

METHODS

The Maraviroc Switch Study is a randomized, multicenter, 96-week, open-label switch study in HIV type 1-infected adults with R5-tropic virus, virologically suppressed on a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) plus double nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (2 N(t)RTI) backbone. Participants were randomized 1:2:2 to current combination antiretroviral therapy (control), or replacing the protease inhibitor (MVC + 2 N(t)RTI arm) or the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone (MVC + PI/r arm) with twice-daily MVC. The primary endpoint was the difference (switch minus control) in proportion with plasma viral load (VL) <200 copies/mL at 48 weeks. The switch arms were judged noninferior if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in the primary endpoint was < -12% in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population.

RESULTS

The ITT population comprised 395 participants (control, n = 82; MVC + 2 N(t)RTI, n = 156; MVC + PI/r, n = 157). Baseline characteristics were well matched. At week 48, noninferior rates of virological suppression were observed in those switching away from a PI/r (93.6% [95% CI, -9.0% to 2.2%] and 91.7% [95% CI, -9.6% to 3.8%] with VL <200 and <50 copies/mL, respectively) compared to the control arm (97.6% and 95.1% with VL <200 and <50 copies/mL, respectively). In contrast, MVC + PI/r did not meet noninferiority bounds and was significantly inferior (84.1% [95% CI, -19.8% to -5.8%] and 77.7% [95% CI, -24.9% to -8.4%] with VL <200 and <50 copies/mL, respectively) to the control arm in the ITT analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support MVC as a switch option for ritonavir-boosted PIs when partnered with a 2-N(t)RTI backbone, but not as part of N(t)RTI-sparing regimens comprising MVC with PI/r.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01384682.

Raltegravir plus two nucleoside analogues as combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients who require cancer chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

There are few data on the best combination antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection who need cancer chemotherapy because of drug-drug interactions and increased risk of toxic effects.

METHODS

We evaluated the safety, efficacy and interactions of a raltegravir (RAL)-based regimen in 30 HIV-infected patients who received antineoplastic agents.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients had a non-AIDS-defining malignancy (7 with Hodgkin disease) and 13 had an HIV-related cancer (9 non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 2 Kaposi sarcoma and 2 anal cancer). Overall, they received 49 cycles of chemotherapy with 19 different antineoplastic drugs, including antimetabolites in 4 patients (5-FU, gemcitabine), alkylating agents in 10 cases (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide), vinca alkaloids in 17 patients (vincristine, vinblastine), anti-tumour antibiotics in 18 cases (doxorubicin), cisplatin or carboplatin in 6, and monoclonal antibodies in 13 patients (rituximab, trastuzumab, cetuximab). Six patients modified the doses of antineoplastic agents due to toxicity not related to raltegravir. During a median follow-up of 67.8 patient-years (median 170 days in concomitant therapy) there was only 1 case of virological failure and no patient discontinued RAL. Geometric mean trough levels of RAL were 143 ng/ml (79-455). There were no opportunistic infections, median CD4(+) T-cell count increased by 49 cells/ml and four (13%) patients died during the study (not related to AIDS progression).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that a RAL-based regimen is safe and effective in patients requiring chemotherapy, irrespective of type and of duration of chemotherapy.