Hepatic immune-mediatedadverseeffects of immune checkpoint inhibitors: analysis of real-life experience

Steroid-refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) hepatitis and ICI rechallenge: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become a cornerstone in cancer treatment. However, this has also resulted in the emergence of immune-related adverse events, notably ICI hepatitis, posing a significant clinical challenge. While steroids are the primary treatment, there are increasing cases of steroid-refractory ICI hepatitis. Our objective is to investigate the management of ICI hepatitis and its response to steroid treatment.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched in July 2023 based on keywords including ICIs (anti-Programmed cell death protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1, anti-CTLA-4, and anti-LAG3) and hepatitis.

RESULTS

A total of 4358 studies were screened, and 44 studies were included in this systematic review. One thousand eight hundred fifty-six patients with ICI hepatitis were included (grade 1-2: 31.7%, grade 3-4: 56.0%, and unknown: 12.3%) with 1184 patients who received corticosteroid treatment. The duration of treatment and dosage varied considerably across the studies. Mycophenolate mofetil was the predominant agent used in 68 out of 82 cases (82.9%), followed by infliximab and azathioprine. A summary estimate of the proportion of steroid-refractory hepatitis in a random effects model was 16% (95% CI: 11%-23%). An estimated 40% (95% CI: 30%-51%) of patients of all patients with ICI hepatitis were rechallenged with an ICI, and of those rechallenged, there was an estimated 22% (95% CI: 15%-30%) recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroids are the primary treatment for ICI hepatitis, with mycophenolate mofetil used as a secondary option for steroids-refractory cases. Current practices mostly rely on expert consensus, highlighting the need for further research to validate and optimize these treatments, particularly for steroid-resistant cases.

Hepatobiliary complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Over the last decade, both their primary focus in trials and clinical application have exponentially risen, with repeated demonstrations of their efficacy in improving survival in various cancer types. The adverse effects of these drugs on various organ systems were recognised in early phase studies. Given their relatively new emergence on the market, there has been increasing interest into short- and long-term effects and management of ICIs in real-world settings. ICI-related hepatobiliary toxicities are often challenging to diagnose and difficult to distinguish from other causes of deranged liver biochemical tests. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date and detailed exploration of the hepatobiliary complications of ICIs, including pathogenesis and approaches to diagnosis and management.

Significance of the autoantibody assay in predicting the development of immune-related adverse events in patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) combination therapy is the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). The management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is an important issue associated with achieving a good therapeutic response in patients receiving AB therapy. However, few studies have reported irAE development in patients receiving AB therapy. This study focused on the association between irAE development and autoantibodies at baseline in patients receiving AB therapy.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients receiving AB therapy were enrolled. For autoantibodies, the following antibodies were tested before the start of AB therapy: antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-thyroglobulin antibodies, thyroid peroxidase antibodies, anti-thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibodies, and acetylcholine receptor antibodies. A patient was considered to have pre-existing antibodies if any of the listed antibodies were present at baseline.

RESULTS

Ten patients (16%) developed irAEs during the observation period. The irAEs included liver injury, hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency, and rhabdomyolysis. Patients with irAE (n = 10) were more likely to be positive for any autoantibody (hazard ratio [HR] 3.7, p = 0.047) and RF at baseline (HR 5.4, p = 0.035) and to achieve complete response (HR 5.8, p = 0.027) than those without. The presence of autoantibodies at baseline was an independent factor associated with irAE development.

CONCLUSION

In the real world, 16% of patients receiving AB therapy for u-HCC developed irAEs. Patients with autoantibodies at baseline are at high risk of developing irAEs and require cautious follow-up.

Key Determinants of Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions to Oncology Drugs

To overcome the epidemiological severity of cancer, developing effective treatments is urgently required. In response, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been revealed as a promising resolution for treatment-resistant cancers across the world. Yet, they have both advantages and disadvantages, bringing therapeutic benefits while simultaneously inducing toxicity, and in particular, immune-mediated adverse drug reactions (imADRs), to the human body. These imADRs can be pathogenic and sometimes lethal, hampering health prediction and monitoring following the provision of ICI treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to collectively identify the determinant factors that contribute to these imADRs induced by ICIs. This article evaluated treatment-, tumor-, and patient-related determinants, and indicated a research gap for future investigations on the pathogenic mechanism of imADRs and translational conversion of determinants into clinical biomarkers to aid pharmacovigilance and cancer therapies.

Hepatotoxicity Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Study Leveraging Data from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a promising option for the treatment of patients with various cancers. Emerging case reports have raised awareness on hepatotoxicity, a potentially fatal adverse event (AE) that may be associated with the use of ICIs. This study assessed the potential association between ICIs and hepatotoxicity through the mining of data from the US Food and Drug Administration's AE Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

A total of 9,217,181 AEs reported in the period from quarter 1 of 2004 to quarter 3 of 2021 were assessed. Information components (ICs) and reporting odds ratios (RORs) were used to evaluate the association between the use of ICIs and hepatotoxicity.

FINDINGS

A total of 52,463 AE reports listed ICIs, used alone or in combination, as a suspected drug. Of these, 1481 cases were related to both ICIs and hepatotoxicity. The use of ICIs was significantly associated with hepatotoxicity compared to all other drugs, making it a safety signal (IC = 1.43 [95% CI, 1.36-1.51]; ROR = 2.78 [95% CI, 2.64-2.93]). With monotherapy, all ICIs, except tremelimumab, were associated with liver damage. The most commonly prescribed combination therapy was nivolumab + ipilimumab (321 cases) with a significant signal detected. Notably, ICI use was significantly associated with hepatic failure (IC = 1.24 [95% CI, 1.06-1.42]; ROR = 2.40 [95% CI, 2.13-2.72]). The risk for ICI-associated hepatotoxicity (including hepatic failure) was greater with ICI combination therapy than with ICI monotherapy. All subgroups by sex and age also showed significant associations between ICI use and hepatotoxicity.

IMPLICATIONS

A significant association was detected between ICI use and hepatotoxicity. The risk for hepatotoxicity (including hepatic failure) was greater with ICI combination therapy compared with ICI monotherapy. (Clin Ther. 2023;45:XXX-XXX) © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Incidence rate and treatment strategy of immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated hepatotoxicity: A systematic review

Background

A hepatic adverse event (HAE) is defined as a liver injury that occurs following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration in oncology Patients. Immune-mediated hepatotoxicity (IMH) is a type of HAE directly caused by ICI and is associated with immune system hyperactivation. HAE incidence varies across different clinical studies. This study aimed to explore the risk factors of HAE and establish a personalized IMH treatment strategy.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ICIs and case reports related to IMH were collected and summarized separately. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.0), whereas correlation analysis and linear regression were performed using SPSS (version 24.0) to evaluate any correlations between the two variables.

Results

Overall, 36 RCTs containing 18,515 patients and 39 case reports met our inclusion criteria. The ICI administration increased the HAE risk (risk ratio [RR] ​= ​1.40) as well as severe HAE (RR ​= ​2.55). The overall HAE incidence and severe incidence were about 15.3% and 4.3%, respectively. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors have a higher incidence of HAE than programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Finally, we found a positive correlation between the onset time of IMH and the recovery time of liver injury.

Conclusions

ICI administration increased the incidence risk of HAE, especially in patients treated with CTLA-4 inhibitors. Regarding IMH treatment, the glucocorticoid dosage must be individually reduced according to the severity and onset time of HAE.