21st Century Challenges to the Provision of Health Care to Adults With Spina Bifida: A Rehabilitation Approach

Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations Among Adults With Pediatric-Onset Disabilities

OBJECTIVE

To examine the risk of any and specific potentially preventable hospitalizations (PPHs) for adults with cerebral palsy (CP) or spina bifida (SB). We hypothesize that PPH risk is greater among adults with CP/SB compared with the general population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017, national private administrative claims data (OptumInsight) in the United States, we identified adults with CP/SB (n=10,617). Adults without CP/SB were included as controls (n=1,443,716). To ensure a similar proportion in basic demographics, we propensity-matched our controls with cases in age and sex (n=10,617). Generalized estimating equation models were applied to examine the risk of CP/SB on PPHs. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, health indicators, US Census Division data, and socioeconomic variables. Adjusted odds ratios were compared within a 4-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Adults with CP/SB had higher risk for any PPH (odds ratio [OR], 4.10; 95% CI, 2.31 to 7.31), and PPHs due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma (OR, 1.85; CI, 1.23 to 2.76), pneumonia (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 2.06 to 4.39), and urinary tract infection (OR, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.91 to 10.75). Cases and controls who had an annual wellness visit had lower PPH risk (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.67); similarly, adults with CP/SB who had an annual wellness visit compared with adults with CP/SB who did not had lower odds of PPH (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.94).

CONCLUSION

Adults with pediatric-onset disabilities are at a greater risk for PPHs. Providing better access to preventive care and health-promoting services, especially for respiratory and urinary outcomes, may reduce PPH risk among this patient population.

Transition of Care of the Spina Bifida Patient from Childhood to Adulthood

Spina bifida is a complex disease process, the care of which involves multiple physicians and other healthcare providers in several disciplines. As our treatment of this disorder has improved over time, thus has survival of these patients into adulthood. Consideration in the care of young adults and adults with spina bifida poses significant challenges that parallel many other disease processes of childhood where medical advances have improved survival. We attempt to discuss the complex disorder that is spina bifida and some of the challenges associated with transition of care of these patients into adulthood.

Philosophy of care delivery for spina bifida

The multidisciplinary model (MCM) is described as one that utilizes skills and experience from practitioners belonging to various disciplines, each treating patients from a specific clinical perspective.1 The Spina Bifida Association (SBA) supports and recommends that clinical care for people with Spina Bifida (SB) be provided in specialty clinics of which the MCM is an example; that care be coordinated; and that there be a plan for transitional care.2 This paper explores the challenges the MCM faces with a transitioning and aging population in a care system that calls for a positive patient experience, engaged health care professionals, desired outcomes, with consideration of cost.

Preface to the special issue for the guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida

"Guidelines for the Care of People with Spina Bifida" provide the best, most up-to-date recommendations for care across the lifespan, from newborn to adult. This special issue of the Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine is a collection of key sections of the 2018 Guidelines. The sections of the Guidelines published herein have been expanded from their original format to include more background information about key topics and why they are important in the care of people with SB. It is the hope of SBA that these and future Guidelines will promote and standardize best practice regardless of the characteristics of individuals with SB or where their care was received. It is through providing better care that we will ultimately achieve a better future for all those living with SB.

Differences in Length of Stay and Costs Between Comparable Hospitalizations of Patients With Spina Bifida With or Without Pressure Injuries

OBJECTIVE

To estimate differences in the length of stay and costs for comparable hospitalizations of patients with spina bifida (SB) with and without pressure injuries.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study.

SETTING

Nationwide Inpatient Sample from years 2010-2014.

PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalizations of patients with SB (N=7776). Hospitalizations among patients with SB and pressure injuries (n=3888) were matched to hospitalizations among patients with SB but without pressure injuries (n=3888).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences in length of stay and total costs between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

After successful matching, multivariate modeling of costs and length of stay on matched sample showed that hospitalizations with pressure injuries had an increased 1.2 inpatient days and excess average costs of $1182 in 2014 dollars.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimated average cost of hospitalization increased by 10%, and the estimated average length of stay increased by 24% in the presence of pressure injuries among hospitalized patients with SB, compared with their peers without these injuries. These results highlight the substantial morbidity associated with pressure injuries, which are potentially preventable before or during hospitalizations among persons with SB.