Problem-Solving After Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescence: Associations With Functional Outcomes

Therapeutic Effect of Aerobic Exercise for Adolescents After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Sport-Related Concussion: A Meta-Analysis from Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials from January 1980 to April 2018 for adolescents with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) to explore the value of aerobic exercise in sport-related concussion (SRC) and mTBI treatment.

METHODS

A meta-analysis for the postconcussion symptom scale (PCSS) score and time to recovery was performed with STATA software.

RESULTS

We found that aerobic exercise versus usual treatment significantly decreased the PCSS score (weighted mean difference = 6.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.29, 12.72; P = 0.040), as well as the time to recovery (weighted mean difference = -3.87; 95% confidence interval: -6.50, -1.23; P = 0.004). However, aerobic exercise showed no significant improvement in immediate postconcussion assessment and cognitive testing (P = 0.471/0.129/0.648/0.800, respectively, in verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor speed, and reaction time).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with usual treatment, aerobic exercise promoted mTBI adolescents' recovery, assessed by PCSS and time to recovery. However, aerobic exercise may not help with neurocognitive function recovery.

A Survivor's Journey: Preliminary efficacy of an online problem-solving therapy for survivors of pediatric brain tumor

BACKGROUND

Although pediatric brain tumor survivors are at high risk for a variety of psychosocial and neurocognitive late effects, there are few evidence-based interventions to address their needs. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of an online problem-solving intervention on improving the quality of life and executive dysfunction among adolescent and young adult brain tumor survivors.

PROCEDURE

A Survivor's Journey was adapted from a similar intervention for survivors of traumatic brain injuries, and involved self-guided web modules providing training in problem-solving as a tool for coping with everyday challenges, as well as weekly teleconferences with a trained therapist. Survivors (n = 19) between the ages of 13 and 25, and their caregivers, completed standardized measures of their emotional and behavioral functioning, executive functioning, and quality of life before and after the 12- to 16-week intervention.

RESULTS

Participation in the intervention led to significant improvements in self-reported overall (M_pre  = 62.03, SD_pre  = 17.67, M_post  = 71.97, SD_post  = 16.75; d = 0.58, P = 0.01) and physical quality of life (M_pre  = 63.13, SD_pre  = 21.88, M_post  = 75.00, SD_post  = 21.33; d = 0.55, P < 0.01) as well as parent-reported emotional quality of life (M_pre  = 65.00, SD_pre  = 28.72, M_post  = 76.15, SD_post  = 23.47; d = 0.43, P = 0.03). Greater improvement was noted in those who were diagnosed before the age of seven and those with average or above average estimated IQs. Current age did not moderate outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Online problem-solving therapy may be efficacious in improving pediatric brain tumor survivors' quality of life; however, further research with a comparison group is needed. Online interventions such as Survivor's Journey may decrease barriers to evidence-based psychosocial care for brain tumor survivors.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of teen online problem-solving for adolescents who have survived an acquired brain injury in the UK: protocol for a randomised, controlled feasibility study (TOPS-UK)

INTRODUCTION

Paediatric acquired brain injury is a leading cause of mortality in children in the UK. Improved treatment during the acute phase has led to increased survival rates, although with life-long morbidity in terms of social and emotional functioning. This is the protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial with an embedded qualitative study and feasibility economic evaluation. If feasible, a later definitive trial will test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an online intervention to enhance problem solving ability versus treatment as usual.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Twenty-five adolescents and their families identified by primary or secondary care clinicians at participating UK National Health Service Trusts will be recruited and individually randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive the online intervention or treatment as usual. Participants will be followed up by online questionnaires 17 weeks after randomisation to capture acceptability of the study and intervention and resource use data. Qualitative interviews will capture participants' and clinicians' experiences of the study.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been granted ethical approval by the South West-Exeter Research Ethics Committee (ref 17/SW/0083). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and will inform the design of a larger trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN10906069.

Brain interrupted: Early life traumatic brain injury and addiction vulnerability

Recent reports provide evidence for increased risk of substance use disorders (SUD) among patients with a history of early-life traumatic brain injury (TBI). Preclinical research utilizing animal models of TBI have identified injury-induced inflammation, blood-brain barrier permeability, and changes to synapses and neuronal networks within regions of the brain associated with the perception of reward. Importantly, these reward pathway networks are underdeveloped during childhood and adolescence, and early-life TBI pathology may interrupt ongoing maturation. As such, maladaptive changes induced by juvenile brain injury may underlie increased susceptibility to SUD. In this review, we describe the available clinical and preclinical evidence that identifies SUD as a persistent psychiatric consequence of pediatric neurotrauma by discussing (1) the incidence of early-life TBI, (2) how preclinical studies model TBI and SUD, (3) TBI-induced neuropathology and neuroinflammation in the corticostriatal regions of the brain, and (4) the link between childhood or adolescent TBI and addiction in adulthood. In summary, preclinical research utilizes an innovative combination of models of early-life TBI and SUD to recapitulate clinical features and to determine how TBI promotes a risk for the development of SUD. However, causal processes that link TBI and SUD remain unclear. Additional research to identify and therapeutically target underlying mechanisms of aberrant reward pathway development will provide a launching point for TBI and SUD treatment strategies.

Electrical stimulation for limb spasticity in children with traumatic brain injury: Study protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Previous clinical studies have reported that electrical stimulation (ES) can be utilized to treat children with limbs spasticity (LS) after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Currently, no systematic review has addressed the effect of ES in children with LS following TBI. Thus, this systematic review will assess the effect and safety of ES for the children with LS after TBI.

METHODS

We will conduct the present systematic review of randomized controlled trials that will be retrieved from searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, WOS, Scopus, OpenGrey, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database from the inception to the date of the literature searched. In addition, the clinical register websites, and reference lists of relevant studies will also be searched. Two independent reviewers will evaluate the eligibility criteria for all papers, extract the data and determine the methodology quality by using Cochrane risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review will pool the latest available data, and are expected to provide the summary of present evidence of ES for children with LS following TBI.

TIMELINE

This systematic review will start on January 10, 2019 and expected to complete by June 1, 2019.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No research ethic approval is needed in this study, because the data of this systematic review will not base on the individual data level. The results will be disseminated to publish at peer-reviewed journals or will present at relevant conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019120037.

Examination of Injury, Host, and Social-Environmental Moderators of Online Family Problem Solving Treatment Efficacy for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Using an Individual Participant Data Meta-Analytic Approach

A series of five randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) conducted between 2002 and 2015 support the potential efficacy of online family problem-solving treatment (OFPST) in improving both child and parent/family outcomes after pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, small sample sizes and heterogeneity across individual studies have precluded examination of potentially important moderators. We jointly analyzed individual participant data (IPD) from these five RCTs, involving 359 children and adolescents between the ages of 5 and 18 years, to confirm the role of previously identified moderators (child's age and pre-treatment symptom levels, parental education) and to examine other potential moderators (race, sex, IQ), using IPD meta-analysis. This reanalysis revealed statistically strong evidence that parental education, child age at baseline, IQ, sex, and parental depression level pre-treatment moderated the effect of OFPST on various outcomes. In particular, children of parents with a less than high school education exhibited fewer internalizing problems and better social competence. Children injured at an older age exhibited fewer externalizing behaviors and less executive dysfunction following OFPST. Child IQ moderated the effect of OFPST on social competence, with significantly better competence for children with lower IQ who received OFPST. Lower levels of parental depression followed OFPST among subgroups with lower IQ, boys, and higher parental depression scores at baseline. Our findings indicate that the optimal application of OFPST is likely to involve older children, those with lower IQ scores, or those from families with lower socioeconomic status (SES).

Moral reasoning and decision-making in adolescents who sustain traumatic brain injury

Objective: Emerging evidence suggests that moral processes are disrupted by traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this study was to explore moral reasoning (MR) and decision-making in adolescents with TBI, and to examine potential associations with global manifestations of social competence.Design: This retrospective, cross-sectional research design compared MR and decision-making in adolescents with mild TBI (n = 20), moderate-severe TBI (n = 23) and typically developing controls (n = 93).Methods: Participants completed a visual task of socio-moral reasoning (SoMoral) and the Index of Empathy for Children and Adolescents. Their parents completed questionnaires documenting their child's behavior (Child Behavior Checklist) and adaptive functioning (Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition).Main results: Adolescents with both mild and moderate-severe TBI displayed more immature MR than typically developing peers. Participants with TBI also provided fewer socially adapted decisions. Closer inspection revealed that this difference was apparent only in the mild TBI group. No significant group differences were observed for empathy, behavior or adaptive skills.Conclusions: Sustaining TBI appears to affect adolescents' ability to provide mature moral justifications when faced with moral dilemmas representative of everyday social conflicts. These difficulties do not appear to be associated with behavior problems, reduced empathy, or adaptive functioning.