A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Persons With Non-specific Low Back Pain With and Without Radiculopathy: Identification of Best Evidence for Rehabilitation to Develop the WHO's Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation

An exploration of patients' perceptions and coping strategies for LBP

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines for managing LBP exist but their recommendations are often not used by health professionals in primary care. A key challenge to address this issue is understanding how people understand LBP, how they feel about it, and cope with it - particularly with regard to why they visit their doctors and their treatment expectations. This is important to understand, particularly since physician barriers to following LBP treatment guidelines have centered on patient issues (such as patient demand for imaging).

METHODS

This was a qualitative, exploratory study using semi-structured interviews to explore patient perceptions of LBP and their coping strategies, paying particular attention to why patients with LBP in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) seek care from family physicians and their treatment expectations, especially with regard to imaging. Eligible patients included adults aged 18 + years or older, living in both rural and urban settings in NL, Canada, who had visited their family physician about low back pain within the year prior to the interview. Researchers experienced in applying the Common-sense Model of Self-regulation (CSM), used the model to inform the development of our question guide and as a framework for the data analysis.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We found that new onset, severity, or persistent pain prompted patients to visit their family doctor, primarily to seek advice and/or a diagnosis, or for a referral to imaging or other providers. While patients believed that imaging was essential to understanding the underlying cause of their symptoms or informing their treatment, they were divided about its effectiveness - some felt it was beneficial to their treatment while others reported that it had no effect. We found that patients were unified in their largely negative views regarding prognosis and all experienced a range of negative emotions surrounding their LBP such as fear, stress, frustration, and guilt. We also found wide variation in understanding of cause and use of coping strategies. Patients posited several causes for the pain including injury, overexertion, comorbid conditions, and issues related to posture and sitting, and were split on their thoughts regarding prevention - about half thought it could be prevented, half did not. We found that patients coped with their LBP using a variety of strategies but were often disappointed in the results. Most reported no benefit to visiting their family doctors for their LBP. Some were pleased with their experiences with allied HCPs, noting small, but steady, improvements using recommended exercises but others were generally dissatisfied.

CONCLUSION

Our exploration of patient views and expectations for low back pain care indicates a mismatch between the care they are looking for and the care they receive. It also suggested a general lack of knowledge about the cause of LBP, the value and usefulness of imaging for its diagnosis and treatment, and poor physician-patient communication.

Accessible Patient Education Materials for Low Back Pain Rarely Meet People's Information Needs: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Patient education is a cornerstone of care for individuals with non-specific low back pain (LBP). However, little is known about whether accessible patient education materials (PEMs) meet people's information needs.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review following the JBI methodology and reported results according to PRISMA-ScR. We systematically reviewed three databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL. The search strategy was iteratively developed and peer-reviewed using the PRESS checklist. Eligible studies had to provide full access to the PEM designed for people with LBP. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently and in duplicate. Five reviewers conducted a consensus-based analysis by independently matching PEM content to eight categories of information needs derived from previous research.

RESULTS

Of 9617 citations identified, 23 studies met inclusion criteria, yielding 41 unique PEMs. We excluded many citations (67.3%) because the PEM used in the study was missing. Most PEMs were in English (95%) and took the form of posters, booklets, or leaflets. Only eight PEMs (19.5%) reported readability assessment. Stakeholder involvement was reported in eight studies. Among PEMs with stakeholder input, characteristics from the PROGRESS + framework were rarely disclosed. Only one PEM addressed all eight identified information needs. The most frequently covered information needs were treatment options (65.9%) and imaging (61.0%), while information on prognosis and flare management was scarce (17.1%).

CONCLUSION

Accessible PEMs for non-specific LBP rarely meet the full spectrum of patient information needs. Improving stakeholder involvement and readability assessment is essential to enhance the usefulness and equity of educational resources.

A cross-sectional study on pain neurophysiology knowledge among Spanish primary healthcare professionals

Healthcare professionals' (HCPs) knowledge and beliefs about pain are known to influence the treatment outcomes. The objective of this descriptive cross-sectional study was to evaluate the knowledge of the neurophysiology of pain among HCPs working with pain patients in primary care. Physiotherapists, nurses, physicians, nursing assistants, social workers and dentists of primary care were surveyed using the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ)(range 0-19) between September-December of 2022. Data on demographics, job-related information, own chronic musculoskeletal pain experience and specific training in the management/treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain were collected and analyzed. Out of 1265 HCPs contacted, 510 (40.3%) participated and completed the survey. They were mostly women (78%), with a mean age of 49.5 ± 11.9 years. The NPQ score was 12.8 ± 2. Physiotherapists scored highest (14.4 ± 2). HCPs with chronic musculoskeletal pain scored less than those without, 12.5 ± 2 vs. 13 ± 1.8 (p < 0.01). The most reported areas of pain were the lumbar spine (25.3%) and neck (24.5%). No differences were found between sexes, age or healthcare profession. Primary HCPs demonstrated low to moderate levels of knowledge in pain neurophysiology, with room for improvement, particularly among those experiencing chronic musculoskeletal pain themselves. These findings suggest a need for enhanced pain management training, both within university curricula and through ongoing professional development programs for HCPs.

Predictors of return to work after multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with chronic low back pain

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic low back pain face functional, psychological, social and professional difficulties. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs (MRP) can be an effective treatment to help these patients to improve their condition and return to work.

OBJECTIVE

To determine baseline predictors for return to work after an MRP for patients with chronic low back pain struggling to maintain their job.

METHODS

A monocentric cohort study was conducted. Patients who had followed a MRP between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. The program consisted of physical activities and different workshops inspired by behavioural therapy, at full time during one month. Pain, lifestyle, history of the disease, function, psychosocial characteristics were evaluated at baseline. Return to work at different possible time point after the MRP was collected. A bivariate and a multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate which factors were associated with return to work.

RESULTS

Overall, 251 patients were included. Professional status, duration off work, intensity of low back pain, self-perceived disability, fear-avoidance beliefs at work were associated with return to work after the MRP on bivariate analysis. Having worked in the past 6months and the absence of high fear-avoidance beliefs at work at baseline were associated with return to work on multivariate analysis.

DISCUSSION

This study suggests that patients with chronic low back pain and professional difficulties need to be included quickly in a MRP, with specific attention to beliefs about pain.

The effects of exercise therapy on lumbar muscle structure in low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Changes in muscle structure are observed in people with low back pain (LBP). Although exercise therapy is arguably one of the most commonly used methods to treat LBP, evidence regarding its effects on muscle structure is still lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To answer the following questions: (1) What are the effects of exercise therapy on lumbar muscle structure in people with LBP and (2) which type of exercise intervention has the greatest effects?

METHODS

Six electronic databases were systematically searched. The RoB 2 tool and the ROBINS-I tool were used to blindly assess the Risk of bias (RoB), and the RevMan 5 tool was used for the meta-analysis. Due to heterogeneity, the various exercise interventions were classified into 4 groups. Interventions that could not be classified into 1 of these 4 groups were not included in the meta-analyses and were qualitatively analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 984 records were retrieved, of which 34 articles were included. The meta-analyses showed that when considering the overall effect size per muscle structural outcome in chronic LBP (cLBP), exercise therapy showed significant positive effects on Lumbar Multifidus (LM) muscle thickness (MT) and LM cross-sectional area (CSA), but not on Lumbar Erector Spinae (LES) CSA and Quadratus Lumborum CSA. Considering the different intervention groups, significant positive effects were observed for: (1) "Motor control + stabilization" with small effect on LM MT, (2) "Stabilization" with medium effect on LM MT, and large effect on LM CSA, and (3) "Motor control + Stabilization + Lumbar strengthening" with large effect on LM MT and LES CSA. There were no significant effects observed for "Lumbar strengthening".

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, exercise therapy has a positive effect on lumbar muscle structural properties in a cLBP population, with a combination of Motor control + Stabilization + Lumbar strengthening giving the best results.

DATABASE REGISTRATION

This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021232583).

State-of-the-Art Personalized Therapy Approaches for Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: Understanding the Mechanisms and Drivers

Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a debilitating condition that affects millions of people worldwide, significantly impacting quality of life and imposing a substantial socioeconomic burden. Traditional treatment approaches often rely on a one-size-fits-all strategy, failing to account for individual variations in pathophysiological mechanisms, drivers, and the principles of personalized medicine. Furthermore, an overemphasis on biomechanical findings from imaging may lead to ineffective interventions and unnecessary surgical procedures, obscuring other important factors that contribute to pain perception. While highlighting the limitations of universal treatment approaches, in this review we present a practical clinical approach aimed at elucidating the main pathophysiological mechanisms and various factors underlying the development and maintenance of CNSLBP in order to create a personalized treatment program. In conclusion, this review underscores the need for personalized therapeutic strategies that take into account the unique characteristics of each patient, recognizing the complex interaction of biological, psychological, social, and other factors that contribute to the development of individual pain. By combining a comprehensive understanding of the complexities of this condition, we aim to improve clinical outcomes and provide information on the development of effective personalized treatment algorithms, particularly in the field of neurological practice.

Understanding responsiveness to an exercise intervention for people with persistent low back pain and lateral abdominal muscle impairments. A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Exercise consistently demonstrates a small effect size for patients with persistent low back pain (PLBP). Determining patient characteristics that influence intervention responsiveness may improve treatment allocation and effect sizes. An exercise intervention for patients with PLBP and maladaptive changes in lateral abdominal muscle (LAM) contraction was recently trialed.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors predicting responsiveness to an exercise intervention for patients with PLBP and why.

METHODS

This was a secondary mixed methods analysis of results from a feasibility randomized controlled trial with 50 participants. The 12-week program included individualized motor control and graded activity exercise. Regressions were performed to understand potential associations between characteristics (demographic, condition-specific signs and symptoms, compliance with exercise, and beliefs about exercise) and outcomes (pain, function, disability, and LAM contraction). Interview transcripts were analyzed for characteristics unique to participants that responded most and least to the intervention. Data was integrated for complementarity.

RESULTS

At baseline, females, participants with lower BMIs, decreased chronicity, fewer areas of pain, who had less previous interactions with healthcare professionals, and who were more positive about the potential for exercise to improve their pain had greater responsiveness (Adjusted R2 ranged from 0.17 to 0.66). During and after the program, increased physical activity levels was a positive predictor.

CONCLUSION

Responsiveness to the intervention may have been mediated by several baseline factors which may have affected participants' engagement with the intervention and continuation with exercise post intervention. Such characteristics may assist clinicians identifying whether this may be an appropriate intervention for patients with PLBP.

Effects of a Postural Hammock in People with Chronic Neck Pain and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and Objectives: Musculoskeletal disorders (MD) affect over 1.7 billion people worldwide, with neck and low back pain being prevalent and debilitating conditions. Current treatments include various interventions, but novel approaches are needed to improve functionality and reduce disability. To evaluate the effects of a postural hammock on pain and functionality in people with chronic neck and low back pain. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with participants experiencing chronic neck and/or low back pain. They were assigned to either an experimental group using a postural hammock or a control group lying on a mat. Participants underwent five sessions of 10 min each over five consecutive days. Results: Forty-three subjects completed the study. While both groups showed improvements, the experimental group exhibited significant increases in hamstring flexibility and pain tolerance, measured through the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and pressure pain thresholds (PPT). Postural hammock use demonstrated potential benefits in pain management and flexibility compared to conventional methods. Conclusions: Using a postural hammock may offer benefits for individuals with chronic back pain. Future research should explore combining hammock therapy with other interventions to enhance outcomes and improve the quality of life for patients with back pain.

Reliability of Shear Wave Elastography for Measuring the Elastic Properties of the Quadratus Lumborum Muscle

Background/Objectives: The quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle is a key structure involved in patients with low back pain (LBP). Since the discriminative capability of morphological descriptors is uncertain and considering the high prevalence of myofascial trigger points and the poor reliability of manual palpation in this condition, developing a reliable procedure for assessing the QL's tenderness is needed for facilitating the diagnosis and monitoring changes over time. We aimed to analyze the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of SWE for calculating the QL tenderness in patients with LBP. Methods: Using a convex transducer, longitudinal shear wave elastography (SWE) images of the QL muscle were acquired bilaterally twice in 52 volunteers with moderate LBP and disability by one experienced examiner and one novel examiner to measure shear wave speed and Young's modulus as stiffness metrics. Results: Intra-examiner reliability estimates demonstrated high consistency independently of the examiner's experience (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) > 0.930) for both metrics. However, experienced examiners showed smaller minimal detectable changes. Additionally, inter-examiner reliability was lower, with ICCs ranging from 0.57 to 0.68, and significant differences in mean values between examiners (p < 0.01) were found. Conclusions: This procedure exhibited excellent intra-examiner reliability for assessing QL muscle stiffness in patients suffering LBP, indicating high repeatability of measurements when performed by the same examiner. In addition, experienced examiners demonstrated greater sensitivity in detecting real changes not attributed to measurement errors. However, inter-examiner reliability was moderate, highlighting the need for consistent examiner use to avoid measurement variability and averaging multiple measurements to enhance the accuracy.

Gaps in Evidence-Based Recommendations for Low Back Pain: Analysis of the Accuracy of the Care Pathway in Primary Care

BACKGROUND

Primary health care is the gateway to low back pain (LBP) management. Effective management of LBP can reduce disability and socioeconomic burden. Standardised, accurate, and evidence-based information for assertive decision-making in care pathways for LBP has the potential to improve health service efficiency.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and analyse the accuracy of the information on the care pathway for the management of LBP in primary care provided by the Ministry of Health from Brazil.

METHODS

Descriptive study of the accuracy of information on the care pathway for LBP in primary care based on an official protocol of the Ministry of Health from Brazil. Information on non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment, as well as health education, was extracted from the treatment protocol. The information was then compared with recent international guidelines for accuracy analysis. Each management recommendation was analysed by two independent researchers and classified as accurate, partially accurate, inaccurate or not mentioned according to the clarity and precision of the information.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that 43% of the management recommendations were accurate, 30% were partially accurate, and 26% of the recommendations presented in the investigated guidelines were not mentioned in the Ministry of Health's care pathway. Pharmacological recommendations showed 50% accuracy, non-pharmacological recommendations 60%, and health education recommendations 14%. Additionally, the care pathway appears to be outdated in recommending educational guidance that is not aligned with current clinical guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that, although there some aspects of the information provided by the Brazilian official management protocol align with international clinical guidelines, there are substantial gaps, especially in the areas of health education and non-pharmacological interventions. This study may contribute to making more accurate information available on LBP, bringing primary care professionals in Brazil closer to evidence-based recommendations.

Global, regional, and national burdens of low back pain in women of childbearing age from 1990 to 2021: an analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2021

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is very common in women of child bearing age (WCBA) and is a major burden on individuals and society, but studies about it have not been reported.

METHODS

Trend analyses were based on data from the Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2021. We investigated global trends in the number of prevalence cases, prevalence and the years lived with disability (YLDs), and the YLDs rate for LBP in the WCBA. We used joint point regression analyses to report average annual changes and identify the most variable years in the global trend. Simultaneously, we further analyzed these trends by stratifying them by the region, nation, and age.

RESULTS

Globally, the number of the prevalence and the YLDs for LBP increased substantially from 1990 to 2021(the prevalence: 39.65%) (the YLDs: 39.53%), whereas the prevalence and the YLDs rate of WCBA LBP decreased (the prevalence: AAPC: -0.1355 [95% CI -0.1419 to -0.1288) (the YLDs: AAPC: -0.1365 [95% CI -0.1427 to -0.1302]). Regionally, the prevalence and the YLDs rate of LBP among WCBA in the medium socio-demographic index region showed an increasing trend(the prevalence: AAPC: 0.1291 [95% CI: 0.118 to 0.1396]) (the YLDs: AAPC: 0.1371 [95% CI: 0.1251 to 0.1499]). Nationally, Thailand and Vietnam were the countries with the largest increases in YLD rates(Thailand: AAPC: 0.7742 [95% CI: 0.7589 to 0.7904]) (Vietnam: AAPC: 0.7364 [95% CI: 0.7263 to 0.7468]). In age patterns, the highest prevalence and YLDs rates of LBP were found among women in the 45-49 age group(the prevalence: 14,412.77 per 100,000 in 2021 [95% UI: 10,482.27 to 19,077.3]) (the YLDs: 1,639.56 per 100,000 population (95% UI: 1,035.24 to 2,494.9]).

CONCLUSION

Despite declines in the prevalence and YLDs of WCBA LBP, the burden remains high. Age- and region-specific prevention and healthcare strategies should be optimized to meet the needs of WCBA and reduce the burden of disease.

Exploring booster session attendance, prescription, and outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Introduction

Booster sessions are a potential method for maintaining self-management behaviors and treatment effects in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). However, few studies have examined booster prescription or outcomes in people with LBP.

Objective

(1) Compare booster prescription for two exercise-based treatments for low back pain (LBP) in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) where the number of boosters prescribed was based on self-management program independence, (2) Determine if there are variables that predict who will require >1 booster, (3) Explore the effects of boosters on pain and function in people who required >1 booster.

Design

Secondary analysis of a RCT in which participants were randomized to motor skill training (MST), MST+Boosters (MST+B), strength and flexibility exercise (SFE), or SFE+B.

Setting

Academic research setting.

Participants

76 participants with chronic LBP assigned to receive boosters.

Interventions

This secondary analysis focuses only on the MST+B and SFE+B groups. Both groups received 6 visits of MST or SFE and six months later received up to 3 boosters. The number of boosters was based on self-management program independence at the first booster. Those who required >1 booster were not able to independently perform their program at the first booster.

Main Outcome Measures

Booster attendance and prescription, pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), function (modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire).

Results

There was not a significant difference between MST+B and SFE+B in returning for the initial booster, χ 2 (1)=1.76, p=0.185. SFE+B were more likely to require >1 booster than MST+B; β =2.39, p <0.001. No participant-specific factors we examined were statistically related to needing >1 booster.

Conclusion

MST+B participants were less likely to require additional boosters. No additional participant-specific factors we examined were associated with needing additional boosters. Qualitatively, attending additional booster sessions did not appear to change pain or function in the current sample.

Nonpharmacological Spine Pain Management in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review Using AGREE II and AGREE-REX Tools

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the content and critically appraise the quality and applicability of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for nonpharmacological, nonsurgical management of spine pain. DESIGN: Systematic review of CPGs. LITERATURE SEARCH: Six databases and seven guideline clearinghouses. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Included de novo CPGs for nonpharmacological, nonsurgical management of spine pain designed for any primary health care providers, published in English, Arabic, French, or traditional Chinese within the past 12 years. DATA SYNTHESIS: Five reviewers independently appraised the guidelines using AGREE II and AGREE-REX. Interrater agreements were calculated for each domain and the total score of these tools using the intraclass correlation coefficient (2, 1) with absolute agreement. RESULTS: We included 30 CPGs, primarily (90%) developed in Western countries, which contained 404 recommendations. High-quality CPGs consistently recommended exercise therapy and multimodal care, encompassing a combination of exercises, mobilization/manipulation, education, alternative medicine, and cognitive-behavioral treatments. Generally, CPGs did not recommend assistive (eg, corsets and orthosis) devices or electro/thermotherapies (eg, therapeutic ultrasound and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation). Approximately half of the CPGs demonstrated good methodological quality according to AGREE II, whereas the rest were of poor quality. On the AGREE-REX assessment, one third of the recommendations were of excellent quality. CONCLUSION: Although recent guidelines frequently recommended exercise therapy and multimodal care for the management of spine pain, their recommendations often overlooked demographics and comorbidities. Despite methodological improvements, most CPGs lacked simple clinical applicability and considerations of knowledge users' values. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-14. Epub 4 November 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12729.

Migu Capsules in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Low Back Pain in Postmenopausal Women: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

This trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of Migu capsules in treating osteoporotic low back pain.

Patients and Methods

In this single-center trial, we randomly assigned patients with osteoporotic low back pain that had lasted for 3 months in a 1:1 ratio to receive Migu capsules alongside Caltrate D in treatment group or to receive Caltrate D only in control group, both for 48 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the intensity of low back pain on a visual analog scale at 24 weeks after enrollment. Secondary outcome measures included the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), bone turnover markers, and bone mineral density.

Results

A total of 100 patients were enrolled, with 50 in each group. At baseline, the mean score for low back pain intensity was 6.2 in the treatment group and 6.1 in the control group. The primary outcome of the low back pain intensity score at 24 weeks was 2.9 in the treatment group and 4.7 in the control group (adjusted mean difference, -1.8; 95% confidence interval, -2.3 to -1.4; P<0.001). Secondary outcomes including the score on RMDQ and pain at 48 weeks were in the same direction as the primary outcome. Compared to the control group, the treatment group only showed a difference in bone density after continuous intervention for 48 weeks (P<0.05). Three patients experienced a mild adverse event associated with the intake of Migu capsules.

Conclusion

Migu capsules can alleviate bone pain and reduce functional disabilities caused by osteoporotic lower back pain.

Retrospective cohort study of fluctuations in emergency department visits for nonspecific back and neck pain during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

We examined fluctuations in emergency department (ED) visits for nonspecific back and neck pain during the COVID-19 pandemic and explored potential contributing factors.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who presented to the ED with nonspecific back and neck pain between January 2019 and December 2021. Demographic data, visit frequencies, and clinical outcomes were analyzed to assess the impact of the pandemic on visit patterns.

RESULTS

A total of 1245 ED visits were recorded. Visits decreased by 30% during the peak of the pandemic, with a gradual return to baseline by mid-2021. No significant changes in patient demographics or clinical outcomes were noted during the pandemic. However, a proportional increase in neck pain visits was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed decline in visits may be linked to pandemic-related concerns, such as fear of exposure in the hospital and reduced activities. The increased neck pain visits highlights the potential influence of pandemic-related stress and lifestyle changes. Visit patterns rebounded as the pandemic eased, indicating a temporary decrease unrelated to condition severity. The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily affected ED visits for nonspecific back and neck pain. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of the pandemic on health care utilization.

Prognostic Factors in Patients Undergoing Physiotherapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Level I Systematic Review

Background: Low back pain is common. For patients with mechanic or non-specific chronic LBP (cLBP), the current guidelines suggest conservative, nonpharmacologic treatment as a first-line treatment. Among the available strategies, physiotherapy represents a common option offered to patients presenting with cLBP. The present systematic review investigates the prognostic factors of patients with mechanic or non-specific cLBP undergoing physiotherapy. Methods: In September 2024, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. All the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated the efficacy of a physiotherapy programme in patients with LBP were accessed. All studies evaluating non-specific or mechanical LBP were included. Data concerning the following PROMs were collected: the pain scale, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). A multiple linear model regression analysis was conducted using the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient. Results: Data from 2773 patients were retrieved. The mean length of symptoms before the treatment was 61.2 months. Conclusions: Age and BMI might exert a limited influence on the outcomes of the physiotherapeutic management of cLBP. Pain and disability at baseline might represent important predictors of health-related quality of life at the six-month follow-up. Further studies on a larger population with a longer follow-up are required to validate these results.

Effects of reducing sedentary behaviour on back pain, paraspinal muscle insulin sensitivity and muscle fat fraction and their associations: a secondary analysis of a 6-month randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Sedentary behaviour (SB) is a plausible intervention target for back pain mitigation. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of a 6-month SB reduction intervention on back pain and related disability outcomes, and paraspinal muscle (ie, erector spinae and transversospinales separately) insulin sensitivity (glucose uptake, GU) and muscle fat fraction (FF).

METHODS

Sixty-four adults with overweight or obesity and metabolic syndrome were randomised into intervention (n=33) and control (n=31) groups. The intervention group aimed to reduce SB by 1 hour/day (measured with accelerometers) and the control group continued as usual. Back pain intensity and pain-related disability were assessed using 10 cm Visual Analogue Scales and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire. Paraspinal muscle GU was measured using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography during hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp. FF was measured using MRI.

RESULTS

Pain-related disability increased during the intervention in both groups. Back pain intensity increased significantly more in the control group than in the intervention group in which back pain intensity remained unchanged (group×time p=0.030). No statistically significant between-group changes in pain-related disability, ODI or paraspinal GU and FF were observed. In the whole study group, the change in daily steps was associated positively with the change in paraspinal muscle GU.

CONCLUSION

An intervention focusing on SB reduction may be feasible for preventing back pain worsening regardless of paraspinal muscle GU or FF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03101228.

The Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Infiltrations Combined with Early Rehabilitation in the Management of Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background and Aims: Low back pain is a prevalent condition affecting 60-85% of individuals during their lifetime. Despite various proposed mechanisms, the etiology of low back pain remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining ultrasound-guided infiltrations with early rehabilitation in reducing pain and improving functional limitations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, reviewing data from January to April 2024 involving 40 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Each patient received two cycles of ultrasound-guided lidocaine and corticosteroid infiltrations at the level of the posterior lower iliac spine, followed by 10 rehabilitation sessions. Patients were assessed at baseline (T0), after the first treatment cycle (T1), and after the second cycle (T2) using the Oswestry Disability Index, Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, Roland Disability Questionnaire, and Numeric Rating Scale. Results: Significant improvements were observed across all assessment scales. The ODI scores decreased from 33.5 at baseline to 3.5 after treatment (p < 0.001). Similar reductions were noted in the QBPDS (from 61.5 to 10.3), RDQ (from 18 to 3.4), and NRS (from 7.4 to 1.3). The combination of ultrasound-guided infiltrations and early rehabilitation resulted in a significant reduction in pain and disability, with the most notable improvements occurring after the second treatment cycle. Conclusions: The integration of ultrasound-guided infiltrations with early rehabilitation is highly effective in managing chronic nonspecific low back pain, significantly reducing both pain and functional limitations.

Physical activity as mediator between back pain and disability

The objective was to explore the mediating role of leisure-time physical activity on the correlation between back pain and disability. A mediation analysis was conducted among the cross-sectional sample of 1330 patients in outpatient clinic. The average age was 47.6 years and 64% were women. For the entire sample, the mediating effect of physical activity remained below 10% of the total effect. The mediating effect was significantly greater among women comparing to men - up to 19.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.4-27.6%] versus 2.3% (95% CI 0.0-6.1%). The effect did not significantly differ based on age, BMI, or educational or professional status. Some insignificant trends, however, could be seen - the effect was possibly stronger among patients with higher educational level and those with higher BMI. The results suggested that while physical activity seems to be a weak mediator, its mediating role might vary across different groups of patients with back pain. This variation should be taken into account when planning rehabilitation measures for people with back pain.

Changes in spinal motor behaviour are associated with reduction in disability in chronic low back pain: A longitudinal cohort study with 1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The need to improve spinal motor behaviour in chronic low back pain (CLBP) rehabilitation remains unclear. The objective of this study was to test if changes in spinal motor behaviour were associated with changes in disability after an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program (IRP) in patients with CLBP.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients with CLBP participating in an IRP were included. Spinal motor behaviour was assessed with biomechanical (lumbar angular amplitude and velocity, erector spinae muscle activity and duration of the task), cognitive-emotional (task-specific fear [PRF]) and pain-related (movement-evoked pain [MEP]) measures during a lifting task before and after the IRP. Disability was measured before and after the IRP, and at 3-month and 1-year follow-ups.

RESULTS

After adjusting for confounders, changes in disability were significantly associated with MEP changes (β adj. = 0.49, p < 0.001) and PRF changes (β adj. = 0.36, p = 0.008), but not with changes in any of the biomechanical measures. MEP at the end of IRP was also associated with disability at 3 months (β adj. = 0.37, p = 0.001) and 1 year (β adj. = 0.42, p = 0.01). Biomechanical measures at the end of the IRP were not associated with disability, except for the duration of the task that was significantly associated with reduction of disability at 3 months (β non-adj = 0.5, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain-related and cognitive-emotional measures of spinal motor behaviour were associated with reduction in disability following an IRP. Future research is needed to further investigate causal relationships between spinal motor behaviour and disability.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study supports a multidimensional understanding and analysis of spinal motor behaviour, integrating the cognitive-emotional, pain-related and biomechanical domains. It also supports the consideration of spinal motor behaviour as a potentially important treatment target in chronic low back pain management. Moreover, it suggests that reducing movement-evoked pain and task-specific fear may have more influence on disability than changing lumbar amplitude, lumbar angular velocity or erector muscle activity, which may have important implications for rehabilitation.

Epistemological Flexibility in Person-Centered Care: The Cynefin Framework for (Re)Integrating Indigenous Body Representations in Manual Therapy

BACKGROUND

Chiropractic, osteopathy, and physiotherapy (COP) professionals regulated outside the United States traditionally incorporate hands-on procedures aligned with their historical principles to guide patient care. However, some authors in COP research advocate a pan-professional, evidence-informed, patient-centered approach to musculoskeletal care, emphasizing hands-off management of patients through education and exercise therapy. The extent to which non-Western sociocultural beliefs about body representations in health and disease, including Indigenous beliefs, could influence the patient-practitioner dyad and affect the interpretation of pillars of evidence-informed practice, such as patient-centered care and patient expectations, remains unknown.

METHODS

our perspective paper combines the best available evidence with expert insights and unique viewpoints to address gaps in the scientific literature and inform an interdisciplinary readership.

RESULTS

A COP pan-professional approach tends to marginalize approaches, such as prevention-oriented clinical scenarios traditionally advocated by osteopathic practitioners for patients with non-Western sociocultural health assumptions. The Cynefin framework was introduced as a decision-making tool to aid clinicians in managing complex clinical scenarios and promoting evidence-informed, patient-centered, and culturally sensitive care.

CONCLUSION

Epistemological flexibility is historically rooted in osteopathic care, due to his Indigenous roots. It is imperative to reintroduce conceptual and operative clinical frameworks that better address contemporary health needs, promote inclusion and equality in healthcare, and enhance the quality of manual therapy services beyond COP's Western-centered perspective.

Effects of Multimodal Physical Therapy on Pain, Disability, H-reflex, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Due to Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Preliminary Trial

Background Lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a condition caused by mechanical compression of nerve roots. Various physical therapy interventions have been proposed for the conservative management of LSR due to LDH. However, the study of physical therapy interventions in a multimodal form is lacking. Additionally, the effect of physical therapy on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters of the compressed nerve root has not been studied. This study aimed to investigate the effects of multimodal physical therapy (MPT) on pain, disability, soleus H-reflex, and DTI parameters of the compressed nerve root in patients with chronic unilateral LSR due to LDH. Methods A prospective preliminary pre-post clinical trial with a convenience sample was conducted. A total of 14 patients with chronic unilateral LSR due to paracentral L4-L5 or L5-S1 LDH were recruited for the study. Participants received a total of 18 sessions of a six-week MPT program that consisted of electrophysical agents, manual therapy interventions, and core stability exercises. Electrophysical agents involved interferential current and hot pack. Manual therapy interventions included myofascial release, side posture positional distraction, passive spinal rotation mobilization, and high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation. Visual analog scale (VAS), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), soleus H-reflex amplitude, side-to-side amplitude (H/H) ratio, fractional anisotropy (FA), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the compressed nerve root were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Results There were significant improvements in VAS, RMDQ, H/H ratio, FA, and ADC of the compressed nerve root. Furthermore, significant improvement was found in the affected side compared with the contralateral side in H-reflex amplitude. Conclusions The observations of this preliminary trial suggest that MPT is a successful intervention in patients with chronic unilateral LSR due to LDH. Regarding DTI parameters of the compressed nerve root, FA increased and ADC decreased. Future studies with a control group, large sample sizes, and longer follow-up periods are needed.

Therapeutic Effect of Movement Control Exercises Combined With Traditional Physiotherapeutic Rehabilitation in A Patient Suffering With Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Case Report

Low back pain (LBP) is a common complaint among individuals engaged in physically demanding occupations, such as construction workers, luggage lifters, manual laborers, and drivers. One of the main problems facing modern healthcare is treating these people. The identification of distinct patient subgroups with non-specific LBP and the development of specialized, more effective therapies are of crucial significance to enhancing evaluation and treatment regimens. This case report describes the evaluation and management of non-specific LBP in a male construction worker who complained of severe low back discomfort. Enhancing the muscular endurance, strength, and flexibility of the back muscles and soft tissues is the main goal of exercise therapy, which is the key to the management of nonspecific LBP. This patient receives a four-week treatment regimen that includes movement control exercises and several advanced therapeutic modalities. The direction of movement control ensures the way patients sit when their back muscles contract. Back muscle activation rates are greater in the active extension group and lower in the flexion group. A comprehensive rehabilitation program that was effective for our patient, who was experiencing lower back discomfort. We assessed the efficacy of our outcome measures using a variety of outcomes, including the modified Oswestry disability index, visual analog scale, range of motion, Quebec back pain disability scale, and pressure biofeedback unit for muscle strength. In addition to a standard physiotherapy course, providing modern physiotherapeutic treatments was found to be more beneficial for enhancing the patient's overall health and quality of life.

Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Practical Overview of Current Possibilities

Lumbar back pain is one of the main causes of disability around the world. Most patients will complain of back pain at least once in their lifetime. The degenerative spine is considered the main cause and is extremely common in the elderly population. Consequently, treatment-related costs are a major burden to the healthcare system in developed and undeveloped countries. After the failure of conservative treatments or to avoid daily chronic drug intake, invasive treatments should be suggested. In a world where many patients reject surgery and prefer minimally invasive procedures, interventional radiology is pivotal in pain management and could represent a bridge between medical therapy and surgical treatment. We herein report the different image-guided procedures that can be used to manage degenerative spine-related low back pain. Particularly, we will focus on indications, different techniques, and treatment outcomes reported in the literature. This literature review focuses on the different minimally invasive percutaneous treatments currently available, underlining the central role of radiologists having the capability to use high-end imaging technology for diagnosis and subsequent treatment, allowing a global approach, reducing unnecessary surgeries and prolonged pain-reliever drug intake with their consequent related complications, improving patients' quality of life, and reducing the economic burden.

Comprehensive Physiotherapy Rehabilitation in a 25-Year-Old Female With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Case Report

A prevalent musculoskeletal disorder known as nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) is characterized by lumbar discomfort or pain that lacks a distinct, identifiable etiology. It is the main root of disability in all corners of the globe, affecting individuals across diverse age groups and occupations. NSLBP is often categorized as a multifactorial condition, encompassing a range of potential contributing factors such as poor posture, sedentary lifestyle, muscle imbalances, and psychosocial elements. According to current standards, there is a good prognosis for acute nonspecific back pain, although this prognosis is mostly reliant on return to function. Various treatment strategies are available, totally reliant upon the underlying cause of the discomfort. This case report presents the combination of traditional therapy and William's flexion exercises in a 25-year-old female nursing student who presented with complaints of low back pain (LBP) for the last three months. This study investigates the effect of William's flexion exercises in nonspecific low back pain to manage pain and range of motion (ROM), and improve the overall quality of life, which was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), modified Schober's test, pressure biofeedback unit, and modified Oswestry disability questionnaire. The patient received an enhanced physiotherapy program that increased the flexibility and range of motion in the lumbar extensor, hip flexor, and hamstring muscles. The outcome measure shows notable gains after the therapeutic interventions.

Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, function, and descending inhibition in people with non-specific chronic low-back pain: a study protocol for a randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is a significant public health problem, is very prevalent, and is often characterized by the persistence of symptoms. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) may benefit people with chronic LBP because it can activate descending inhibitory pathways and inhibit central excitability. However, previous studies that have investigated the effects of TENS on pain in people with LBP have failed to use proper intensities of current, and the timing of the assessment of pain was not performed during the peak of the analgesic response or functional activities. Therefore, the present study aims to assess the effects of TENS on measures of pain, function, and descending inhibition using the maximal tolerable intensity of TENS in participants with LBP.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study will be a randomized crossover trial. The participants for this study will be recruited from various places, including the University of Hartford, physical therapy clinics, and local businesses in the Hartford area, as well as online websites geared towards clinical trial recruitment. A total of 34 participants will receive all three treatments: active TENS, placebo TENS, and no treatment control. The treatment order will be randomized using a website-based randomization tool. For active TENS, a modulating frequency of 2-125 Hz will be applied with a variable pulse duration and maximal tolerable intensity for 30 min. The TENS will be left on for post-treatment testing to assess the effects during its maximally effective period for a total of 50 to 60 min. Furthermore, the intensity may be turned down if muscle twitching is present to ensure blinding of the evaluator. For placebo TENS, the unit will deliver current for 45 s, ramping to 0 in the last 15 s. The primary outcome will be pain intensity at rest and with movement, determined using the numerical pain rating scale. The secondary outcomes will be pressure pain threshold, heat pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, conditioned pain modulation, sit-to-stand test, and repeated trunk flexion. The assessments will be performed immediately before and after treatment. Statistical analysis of the data obtained will consider a significance level of p < 0.05.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide evidence concerning the effects and mechanisms of TENS treatment in participants with chronic non-specific low back pain. The outcomes, including pain, function, and descending inhibition, will help us gain a greater understanding of how TENS can be used for these participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05812885. Registered on 24th May 2023.

Effects of Manual Therapy Plus Pain Neuroscience Education with Integrated Motivational Interviewing in Individuals with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study

Background and Objectives: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) persists beyond 12 weeks. Manual therapy recommended for CNLBP demonstrates short-term efficacy. Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) teaches patients to modify pain perception through explanations, metaphors, and examples, targeting brain re-education. Motivational Interviewing (MI) enhances motivation for behavioral change, steering patients away from ambivalence and uncertainty. These approaches collectively address the multifaceted nature of CNLBP for effective management. The aim of this study was to investigate a manual therapy intervention combined with PNE with MI on pain, pressure pain threshold (PPT), disability, kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, and low back functional ability in individuals experiencing CNLBP. Materials and Methods: Sixty adults with CNLBP were randomly divided into three equal groups (each n = 20). The first group received manual therapy and PNE with integrated MI (combined therapy group), the second group underwent only manual therapy (manual therapy group), and the third group followed a general exercise program at home (control group). Pain in the last 24 h was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), functional ability with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), PPT in the lumbar region through pressure algometry, kinesiophobia with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), catastrophizing with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and performance using the Back Performance Scale (BPS) at baseline, in the fourth week, and six months post-intervention. Results: Statistically significant differences between the intervention groups and the control group were found in both the fourth-week measurement and the six-month follow-up, as evident in the NPRS and RMDQ scores, as well as in the total values of tested PPTs (p < 0.05). Differences were also observed between the two intervention groups, with a statistically greater improvement in the combined therapy group at both time points (fourth week and six-month follow-up) (p < 0.05). Regarding the TSK and PCS scores in the fourth week, statistically significant differences were observed between the two intervention groups compared to the control group, as well as between the two intervention groups (p < 0.05). However, in the six-month follow-up, statistically significant differences were found only between the combined therapy group and the other two groups, with the combined therapy group showing significant improvements (p < 0.05). In relation to BPS, both intervention groups exhibited statistically significant differences compared to the control group in the fourth week, without any significant differences between the two intervention groups. However, in the six-month follow-up, significant differences were noted between the combined therapy group and the other two groups (p < 0.05), with combined therapy demonstrating greater improvement. Conclusions: The addition of PNE with integrated MI enhanced the positive effects of a manual therapy intervention in all outcome measures. The combination of manual therapy plus PNE with integrated MI appeared to provide greater improvements compared to the isolated application of manual therapy, and these improvements also lasted longer. These short- and long-term positive effects are likely attributed to the combination of PNE with integrated MI, which contributed to increasing the effectiveness of the treatment. Further studies are required to investigate the optimum dosage of manual therapy and PNE with integrated MI in individuals with CNLBP.

Frequency and indication of non-musculoskeletal examinations: a cross-sectional survey of Quebec chiropractors

BACKGROUND

Approximately 1% of low back pain is estimated to be caused by serious systemic diseases, including cancer, infection, or abdominal aortic dissection. This study aimed to determine the frequency of execution of non-MSK physical examination procedures among Quebec chiropractors and to identify the clinical context that prompts them to use these physical examination procedures.

METHODS

Cross-sectional survey containing 44 questions administered to a random sample of Quebec chiropractors using a succession of online, postal and phone questionnaires. The 4-part survey questionnaire contained six demographic questions, 28 single-choice questions to determine the frequency of execution of non-MSK physical examination procedures, seven short clinical vignettes for which the respondents had to select the non-MSK examinations that would be required, and two questions inquiring about the proportion of new patients for which participants' felt non-MSK examinations were necessary and whether appropriate assessments were performed. The questionnaire was pilot tested, and feedback received integrated prior to administration. We conducted descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and an ANOVA.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 182 chiropractors (response rate: 36.4%). The most commonly non-musculoskeletal examination performed daily were blood pressure (12.1%) and cranial nerves (4.9%). The most common tests never performed were oxygen saturation (68.7%), cardiac auscultation (69.2%), tibio-brachial index (71.4%), breast (86.8%), rectal (96.7%), testicular (95.6%), and vaginal (99.9%) exams. Female chiropractors and Quebec University in Trois-Rivières graduates reported that a significantly higher proportion of their new patients required a non-musculoskeletal physical examination compared to male participants (37.2% vs 28.3%) or Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College graduates (33.9% vs 19.9%). Reason for not performing a physical examination included the belief that another healthcare professional was better positioned to perform and/or interpret the related tests (76.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Vital signs and cranial nerve examinations were the most frequency performed non-musculoskeletal examinations reported by chiropractors. Apart from the genitourinary exam almost never performed, most participants chose non-musculoskeletal examinations deemed appropriate for the patient's presentation.

Healthcare provider perspectives on integrating a comprehensive spine care model in an academic health system: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Healthcare systems (HCS) are challenged in adopting and sustaining comprehensive approaches to spine care that require coordination and collaboration among multiple service units. The integration of clinicians who provide first line, evidence-based, non-pharmacological therapies further complicates adoption of these care pathways. This cross-sectional study explored clinician perceptions about the integration of guideline-concordant care and optimal spine care workforce requirements within an academic HCS.

METHODS

Spine care clinicians from Duke University Health System (DUHS) completed a 26-item online survey via Qualtrics on barriers and facilitators to delivering guideline concordant care for low back pain patients. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 27 clinicians (57% response) responded to one or more items on the questionnaire, with 23 completing the majority of questions. Respondents reported that guidelines were implementable within DUHS, but no spine care guideline was used consistently across provider types. Guideline access and integration with electronic records were barriers to use. Respondents (81%) agreed most patients would benefit from non-pharmacological therapies such as physical therapy or chiropractic before receiving specialty referrals. Providers perceived spine patients expected diagnostic imaging (81%) and medication (70%) over non-pharmacological therapies. Providers agreed that receiving imaging (63%) and opioids (59%) benchmarks could be helpful but might not change their ordering practice, even if nudged by best practice advisories. Participants felt that an optimal spine care workforce would require more chiropractors and primary care providers and fewer neurosurgeons and orthopedists. In qualitative responses, respondents emphasized the following barriers to guideline-concordant care implementation: patient expectations, provider confidence with referral pathways, timely access, and the appropriate role of spine surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Spine care clinicians had positive support for current tenets of guideline-concordant spine care for low back pain patients. However, significant barriers to implementation were identified, including mixed opinions about integration of non-pharmacological therapies, referral pathways, and best practices for imaging and opioid use.

Effects of a Therapeutic Exercise Protocol for Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Back Pain in Primary Health Care: A Single-Group Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Back pain is highly prevalent; in Spain, it produces a very high economic cost and the scientific evidence supporting treatments shows low to moderate evidence for exercise. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a therapeutic group exercise protocol in reducing pain intensity and disability in patients with back pain in primary health care setting.

METHODS

A total sample of 149 patients who suffered from chronic non-specific back pain was selected. Patients received a therapeutic exercise protocol, including auto-mobilization exercises for the neck and lumbar regions, as well as core stabilization exercises. Pain intensity and disability were evaluated before and after the therapeutic exercise protocol.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were shown in pain intensity and disability for patients with non-specific neck and low-back pain, with an effect size from moderate to large.

CONCLUSIONS

A therapeutic exercise protocol may provide beneficial effects upon disability and pain intensity in patients with chronic non-specific back pain, including neck and low-back pain conditions In addition, It could be considered for inclusion as a back-pain-approach program in primary healthcare.