Randomized controlled trial of overall functional exercise process in perioperative of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) has become the standard surgery for the patients of lumbar disc herniation with the advantages of less trauma and rapid recovery. But still some patients have poor prognosis after PTED. A major risk factor associated with the poor prognosis may be the unfit function exercise.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the effect of overall functional exercise process for PTED.

METHODS

In January 2019 to June 2020, a single center randomized controlled trial was proceeded. The patients scheduled for PTED were randomly divided into the experimental group, which received overall functional exercise and the control group, which received routine process. The overall process included advance, whole-course exercise and integrating of traditional Chinese medical methods. The general information, visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) score at each follow-up point perioperative period were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the general information, the preoperative VAS and ODI. On the 3rd day after operation, the VAS of low back pain and leg pain in the experimental group were lower than the control group. One month after operation, the VAS of low back pain in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group. One to 3 months after operation, the ODI scores of the experimental group were better than that of the control group. There was no significant difference in modified MacNab index between the experimental group and the control group.

CONCLUSION

Function exercise is important for the prognosis of minimally invasive lumbar surgery. The overall function exercise process perioperative is helpful to relieve the short-term pain of the patients and significantly improve the prognosis.

Thunder-fire moxibustion for lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common degenerative disease that severely impacts the quality of life of patients. Thunder-fire moxibustion is an ancient Chinese medicine-based external therapeutic procedure that has been employed for pain relief until this day. The focus of our study was to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of thunder-fire moxibustion in the treatment of LDH.

METHODS

The literature databases searched included the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Springer, PubMed, Wanfang digital periodicals database, China national knowledge infrastructure, VIP, and Chinese biomedical literature database, and the search period was from database creation to March 2022. These include randomized controlled trials of Thunder-Fire moxibustion alone or in combination with other therapies for LDH. Two evaluators independently extracted data. We accessed the quality of inclusive studies through a Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager (Version 5.5). Data was analyzed using fixed-effects or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity test results.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 17 studies involving 1344 patients with LDH. The analysis results were as follows: compared with other therapies, the efficacy of thunder-fire moxibustion was statistically significant; the total effective rate (RR = 1.20; 95%CI [1.15, 1.26]; P < .00001), the Japanese orthopaedic association score (MD = 4.42; 95%CI [4.10, 4.73]; P < .00001), the pain score (SMD = -2.66; 95% CI [-3.39, -1.94]; P < .00001). Only 2 reported no adverse events in the included literature, and the remaining had no relevant records. The quality of the evidence in the 17 papers we examined was low or very low.

CONCLUSION

Thunder-Fire moxibustion is effective in relieving discomfort in patients with LDH. It has significant clinical efficacy, but there is still a need for prospective, multicentre, large-sample randomized controlled trials to enhance the clinical evidence due to the quality of included studies and methodological limitations.