Can I eat that too? 18-month-olds generalize social information about edibility to similar looking plants

The modular mind and psychiatry: toward clinical integration with a focus on self-disorders

One of the foundational tenets of evolutionary psychology, the modular view of the mind, offers promising applications for clinical psychiatry. This perspective conceptualizes the mind as a collection of specialized information-processing modules, shaped by natural selection to address adaptive challenges faced by our ancestors. In this paper, we propose several points of integration between the modularity framework and clinical psychiatric practice. First, we argue that the descriptive psychopathology of self-disorders provides evidence supporting the modular view, demonstrating how a dysfunctional minimal self may expose the mind's modular architecture to conscious awareness. Next, we will explore how the modular perspective can illuminate the nature of intrapsychic conflicts. Finally, we will discuss how evidence from neuropsychiatric syndromes supports the modular view of the mind and, in turn, how this perspective can provide a basis for classifying mental disorders.

Survival in a world of complex dangers

How did our nomadic ancestors continually adapt to the seemingly limitless and unpredictable number of dangers in the natural world? We argue that human defensive behaviors are dynamically constructed to facilitate survival in capricious and itinerant environments. We first hypothesize that internal and external states result in state constructions that combine to form a meta-representation. When a threat is detected, it triggers the action construction. Action constructions are formed through two contiguous survival strategies: generalization strategies, which are used when encountering new threats and ecologies. Generalization strategies are associated with cognitive representations that have high dimensionality and which furnish flexible psychological constructs, including relations between threats, and imagination, and which converge through the construction of defensive states. We posit that generalization strategies drive 'explorative' behaviors including information seeking, where the goal is to increase knowledge that can be used to mitigate current and future threats. Conversely, specialization strategies entail lower dimensional representations, which underpin specialized, sometimes reflexive, or habitual survival behaviors that are 'exploitative'. Together, these strategies capture a central adaptive feature of human survival systems: self-preservation in response to a myriad of threats.

Visual segmentation of complex naturalistic structures in an infant eye-tracking search task

An infant’s everyday visual environment is composed of a complex array of entities, some of which are well integrated into their surroundings. Although infants are already sensitive to some categories in their first year of life, it is not clear which visual information supports their detection of meaningful elements within naturalistic scenes. Here we investigated the impact of image characteristics on 8-month-olds’ search performance using a gaze contingent eye-tracking search task. Infants had to detect a target patch on a background image. The stimuli consisted of images taken from three categories: vegetation, non-living natural elements (e.g., stones), and manmade artifacts, for which we also assessed target background differences in lower- and higher-level visual properties. Our results showed that larger target-background differences in the statistical properties scaling invariance and entropy, and also stimulus backgrounds including low pictorial depth, predicted better detection performance. Furthermore, category membership only affected search performance if supported by luminance contrast. Data from an adult comparison group also indicated that infants’ search performance relied more on lower-order visual properties than adults. Taken together, these results suggest that infants use a combination of property- and category-related information to parse complex visual stimuli.

Does social modeling increase infants' willingness to accept unfamiliar foods?

Despite a rich knowledge base about infants' social learning and studies observing social referencing in other species in food contexts, we know surprisingly little about social learning about food among human infants. This gap in the literature is particularly surprising considering that feeding unfamiliar foods to infants is a very common experience as infants begin to eat solid foods. The present study examines whether parental social modeling influences infants' willingness to accept unfamiliar foods. In two Zoom sessions, parents will be asked to feed unfamiliar foods to their 6- to 24-month-old infants (different unfamiliar foods in each session). In both sessions, infants' food acceptance and rejection will be measured. In the first session, parents will be asked to do what they would typically do; spontaneous social modeling will be recorded. In the second session, parents will be instructed to model eating the unfamiliar food. We will examine associations between infants' willingness to eat unfamiliar foods, parent social modeling, and extant parent and infant characteristics.

Learning blossoms: Caregiver-infant interactions in an outdoor garden setting

Plants provide unique opportunities for learning by engaging all human senses. Recent laboratory studies have shown that infants use a combination of behavioural avoidance and social learning strategies to safely learn about plant properties from adults. Here we investigate how infants and their caregivers interact with plants in an outdoor garden as a first step towards examining the operation of these social learning processes in naturalistic settings. We focus on two specific aspects of spontaneous infant-caregiver interactions with plants: olfactory and touch behaviours. Additionally, we look at whether infants' and caregivers' prior knowledge of the plants in our study influences infants' behaviour. Our results showed a multifaceted connection between infants' and caregivers' previous experience with the plants and their olfactory and touch behaviours. First, infants tended to touch and smell the plants after their caregivers did, and this appeared to be independent of whether infants had seen the plant before. Second, infants systematically engaged in some of the same types of olfactory and touch behaviours their caregiver displayed towards plants. Finally, infants whose caregivers were given more information about the plants in the study showed fewer touch behaviours, but no difference in olfactory behaviours. These findings bolster the previous laboratory studies of plant learning early in life, highlighting the importance of olfactory behaviours, and underscoring the benefits of using ecological observations to explore unique aspects of human development.

The multidimensional nature of food neophobia

People vary in their willingness to try new foods. This variation, which is most frequently measured using the Food Neophobia Scale (FNS; Pliner & Hobden, 1992), has been interpreted as unidimensional. In four studies (N's = 210, 306, 160, and 161), we 1) demonstrate that food neophobia varies across meat and plant dimensions, 2) explore the validity of a measure of meat and plant neophobia, and 3) test whether these food neophobia dimensions predict decisions to eat a novel food item (i.e., a snack bar that contains insects). Mixed-effects model across the four studies indicated that the two dimensions differentially relate to a number of variables, including disgust sensitivity, animal empathy, and masculinity. Women scored higher on meat neophobia than men, but the sexes did not differ on plant neophobia. Only meat neophobia uniquely predicted eating a novel insect-based snack bar. Overall, these results extend knowledge regarding orientations toward novel foods.