C-Reactive Protein Concentration in Steady-State Bronchiectasis: Prognostic Value of Future Severe Exacerbations. Data From the Spanish Registry of Bronchiectasis (RIBRON)

The Association Between Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index at Admission and Readmission in Patients with Bronchiectasis

Purpose

Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), calculated by (neutrophils count × platelet count)/lymphocytes count, is a novel index of the local immune response and systemic inflammation response. The SII has been shown to play an important role in the prognosis of many diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, cancer and COPD. However, its role in the prognosis of bronchiectasis remains unclear and requires further investigation. This study aimed to investigate the association between SII and readmissions in patients with acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all bronchiectasis patients admitted to the respiratory ward in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from January 2020 to January 2022. Patients were classified into four groups according to the quartiles of log2(SII) at admission. The primary endpoint was readmission at 1-year follow up. Univariate and multivariate cox regression models were applied to investigate the relationship between SII and readmissions at 1-year follow up in patients with bronchiectasis.

Results

A total of 521 patients were included in our study. The median (IQR) SII at admission were 506.10 (564.84). Patients with higher SII tended to be older, male, past and current smokers, have lower BMI, and more dyspnea symptoms. They also had higher inflammatory markers and received a greater spectrum of antibiotics and more intravenous glucocorticoids. Higher SII at admission were independently associated with readmission in patients with acute exacerbations for bronchiectasis following confounder adjustment (OR =1.007; 95% CI, 1.003-1.011; p <0.001).

Conclusion

Patients with elevated SII levels were typically older males, often smokers, with lower BMI and increased dyspnea. They received more antibiotics and intravenous glucocorticoids. Higher SII at admission are associated with readmission in patients with acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis. SII has potential clinical value as a predictive biomarker for clinical outcomes in bronchiectasis, offering a valuable tool for management strategies.

Reliability of blood eosinophil count in steady-state bronchiectasis

RATIONALE

The baseline value of eosinophils in peripheral blood (BEC) has been associated with different degrees of severity, prognosis and response to treatment in patients with bronchiectasis. It is not known, however, if this basal value remains constant over time.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess whether the BEC remains stable in the long term in patients with bronchiectasis.

METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS

Patients from the RIBRON registry of bronchiectasis diagnosed by computed tomography with at least 2 BEC measurements one year apart were included in the study. Patients with asthma and those taking anti-eosinophilic drugs were excluded. Reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A patient with a BEC of at least 300 cells/uL or less than 100 cells/uL was considered eosinophilic or eosinopenic, respectively. Group changes over time were also calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirteen patients were finally included, with a mean age of 66.5 (13.2) years (65.8 % women). A total of 2701 BEC measurements were performed, with a median number of measurements per patient of 4 (IQR: 2-5) separated by a median of 12.1 (IQR: 10.5-14.3) months between two consecutive measurements. The ICC was good (>0.75) when calculated between two consecutive measurements (approximately one year apart) but had dropped significantly by the time of the next annual measurements. Similarly, the change from an eosinophilic or eosinopenic patient to a non-eosinophilic or non-eosinopenic patient, respectively, was less than 30 % during the first year with respect to the baseline value but was close to 50 % in later measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the significant changes observed in the baseline value of the BEC over time, its monitoring is necessary in patients with bronchiectasis in order to more reliably assess its usefulness.

Endotypes in bronchiectasis: moving towards precision medicine. A narrative review

Bronchiectasis is a highly complex entity that can be very challenging to investigate and manage. Patients are diverse in their aetiology, symptoms, risk of complications and outcomes. "Endotypes"- subtypes of disease with distinct biological mechanisms, has been proposed as a means of better managing bronchiectasis. This review discusses the emerging field of endotyping in bronchiectasis. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials (RCT), observational studies, systematic reviews and meta-analysis published from inception until October 2022, using the terms: "bronchiectasis", "endotypes", "biomarkers", "microbiome" and "inflammation". Exclusion criteria included commentaries and non-English language articles as well as case reports. Duplicate articles between databases were initially identified and appropriately excluded. Studies identified suggest that it is possible to classify bronchiectasis patients into multiple endotypes deriving from their co-morbidities or underlying causes to complex infective or inflammatory endotypes. Specific biomarkers closely related to a particular endotype might be used to determine response to treatment and prognosis. The most clearly defined examples of endotypes in bronchiectasis are the underlying causes such as immunodeficiency or allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis where the underlying causes are clearly related to a specific treatment. The heterogeneity of bronchiectasis extends, however, far beyond aetiology and it is now possible to identify subtypes of disease based on inflammatory mechanisms such airway neutrophil extracellular traps and eosinophilia. In future biomarkers of host response and infection, including the microbiome may be useful to guide treatments and to increase the success of randomized trials. Advances in the understanding the inflammatory pathways, microbiome, and genetics in bronchiectasis are key to move towards a personalized medicine in bronchiectasis.

Bronchiectasis-COPD Overlap Syndrome: Role of Peripheral Eosinophil Count and Inhaled Corticosteroid Treatment

Both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis are highly prevalent diseases. In both cases, inhaled corticosteroids (ICs) are associated with a decrease in exacerbations in patients with a high peripheral blood eosinophil count (BEC), but it is still not known what occurs in bronchiectasis-COPD overlap syndrome (BCOS). The present study aimed to assess the effect of ICs on various outcomes in patients with BCOS, according to BEC values. We undertook a post-hoc analysis of a cohort of 201 GOLD II-IV COPD patients with a long-term follow-up (median 74 [IQR: 40-106] months). All participants underwent computerized tomography and 115 (57.2%) had confirmed BCOS. A standardized clinical protocol was followed and two sputum samples were collected at each medical visit (every 3-6 months), whenever possible. During follow-up, there were 68 deaths (59.1%), and the mean rate of exacerbations and hospitalizations per year was 1.42 (1.2) and 0.57 (0.83), respectively. A total of 44.3% of the patients presented at least one pneumonic episode per year. The mean value of eosinophils was 402 (112) eosinophils/µL, with 27 (23.5%), 63 (54.8%), and 25 patients (21.7%) presenting, respectively, less than 100, 101-300, and more than 300 eosinophils/µL. A total of 84 patients (73.1%) took ICs. The higher the BEC, the higher the annual rate of exacerbations and hospitalizations. Patients with less than 100 eosinophils/µL presented more infectious events (incident exacerbations, pneumonic episodes, and chronic bronchial infection via pathogenic bacteria). Only those patients with eosinophilia (>300 eosinophils/µL) treated with ICs decreased the number (1.77 (1.2) vs. 1.08 (0.6), p < 0.001) and the severity (0.67 (0.8) vs. 0.35 (0.5), p = 0.011) of exacerbations, without any changes in the other infectious outcomes or mortality. In conclusion, ICs treatment in patients with BCOS with increased BEC decreased the number and severity of incident exacerbations without any negative influence on other infectious outcomes (incidence of pneumonia or chronic bronchial infection).

C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians

The current literature provides a body of evidence on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and its potential role in inflammation. However, most pieces of evidence are sparse and controversial. This critical state-of-the-art monography provides all the crucial data on the potential biochemical properties of the protein, along with further evidence on its potential pathobiology, both for its pentameric and monomeric forms, including information for its ligands as well as the possible function of autoantibodies against the protein. Furthermore, the current evidence on its potential utility as a biomarker of various diseases is presented, of all cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatobiliary, gastrointestinal, pancreatic, renal, gynecological, andrological, dental, oral, otorhinolaryngological, ophthalmological, dermatological, musculoskeletal, neurological, mental, splenic, thyroid conditions, as well as infections, autoimmune-supposed conditions and neoplasms, including other possible factors that have been linked with elevated concentrations of that protein. Moreover, data on molecular diagnostics on CRP are discussed, and possible etiologies of false test results are highlighted. Additionally, this review evaluates all current pieces of evidence on CRP and systemic inflammation, and highlights future goals. Finally, a novel diagnostic algorithm to carefully assess the CRP level for a precise diagnosis of a medical condition is illustrated.

Etiology of Bronchiectasis in the World: Data from the Published National and International Registries

Bronchiectasis is the third leading chronic inflammatory disease of the airway caused by dozens of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary diseases. Infection by pathogenic microorganisms is very common. We aimed to analyze, for the first time in the literature, the etiology of bronchiectasis throughout the world via data published in national and international registries. A bibliographic search was carried out in PubMed and Web of Science. Seven studies were included, with a total of 27,258 patients from 33 countries of four continents. The most frequent cause of bronchiectasis was post-infectious: 30.5% (range: 19.1-40.4%), followed by idiopathic: 28.7% (18.5-38.1%). Post-tuberculous bronchiectasis accounted for 14.1% (1.8-35.5%), while etiologies associated with COPD and asthma comprised 7% (3.4-10.9%) and 5.2% (2.5-7.8%). In conclusion, there was a high degree of heterogeneity in the relative percentages of the main causes of bronchiectasis in the world, although post-infectious and idiophatic bronchiectasis continue to be the most frequent causes.

The U-Shaped Relationship Between Eosinophil Count and Bronchiectasis Severity: The Effect of Inhaled Corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Although a proven relationship exists between the blood eosinophil count (BEC) and the severity of both asthma and COPD, its relationship with bronchiectasis has not been well established. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between BEC and the number and severity of exacerbations, and patients' responses to inhaled corticosteroid (IC) treatment in bronchiectasis RESEARCH QUESTION: Does an association exist among BEC, the number of exacerbations and severity of bronchiectasis, and IC treatment?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a multicenter (43 centers) prospective observational study derived from the Spanish Bronchiectasis Registry. Patients with proven bronchiectasis and a known BEC were included, whereas those with asthma or antieosinophilic treatments were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups according to the BEC at the time of inclusion in the study in a steady-state situation: (1) eosinopenic bronchiectasis (< 50 eosinophils/μL), (2) low number of eosinophils (51-100/μL), (3) normal number of eosinophils (101-300/μL), and (4) eosinophilic bronchiectasis (> 300 eosinophils/μL).

RESULTS

Nine hundred twenty-eight patients finally were included: 123 patients (13.3%) with < 50 eosinophils/μL (eosinopenic group), 164 patients (17.7%) with 50-100 eosinophils/μL, 488 patients (52.6%) with 101-300 eosinophils/μL, and 153 patients (16.5%) with > 300 eosinophils/μL (eosinophilic group). BEC showed a significant U-shaped relationship with severity, exacerbations, lung function, microbiologic profile, and IC treatment (these being higher in the eosinopenic group compared with the eosinophilic group). IC treatment significantly decreased the number and severity of exacerbations only in the group of bronchiectasis patients with > 300 eosinophils/μL.

INTERPRETATION

A significant U-shaped relationship was found between BEC and severity and exacerbations in bronchiectasis that was more pronounced in the eosinopenic group. IC treatment decreased the number and severity of exacerbations only in the eosinophilic group.

Efficacy and Safety of Dry Powder Antibiotics: A Narrative Review

The use of inhaled antibiotics was initially almost exclusively confined to patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, it has been extended in recent decades to patients with non-CF bronchiectasis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who present with chronic bronchial infection by potentially pathogenic microorganisms. Inhaled antibiotics reach high concentrations in the area of infection, which enhances their effect and enables their long-term administration to defeat the most resistant infections, while minimizing possible adverse effects. New formulations of inhaled dry powder antibiotics have been developed, providing, among other advantages, faster preparation and administration of the drug, as well as avoiding the requirement to clean nebulization equipment. In this review, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the different types of devices that allow the inhalation of antibiotics, especially dry powder inhalers. We describe their general characteristics, the different inhalers on the market and the proper way to use them. We analyze the factors that influence the way in which the dry powder drug reaches the lower airways, as well as aspects of microbiological effectiveness and risks of resistance development. We review the scientific evidence on the use of colistin and tobramycin with this type of device, both in patients with CF and with non-CF bronchiectasis. Finally, we discuss the literature on the development of new dry powder antibiotics.

Inhaled Corticosteroids and Bronchiectasis: Friend or Foe?

The three most common chronic inflammatory airway diseases are asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and bronchiectasis [...].

Pathophysiology of Chronic Bronchial Infection in Bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis is a complex and heterogeneous disease. Its pathophysiology is poorly understood, but chronic bronchial infection plays an important role in its natural history, and is associated with poor quality of life, more exacerbations and increased mortality. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus are the most common bacteria related to chronic bronchial infection. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria, fungi and respiratory viruses are also present during clinical stability, and may increase the risk of acute exacerbation. Chronic inflammation is present in bronchiectasis, especially neutrophilic inflammation. However, macrophages and eosinophils also play a key role in the disease. Finally, airway epithelium has innate mechanisms such as mucociliary clearance and antibacterial molecules like mucins and antimicrobial peptides that protect the airways from pathogens. This review addresses how the persistence of microorganisms in the airways and the imbalance of the immune system contribute to the development of chronic bronchial infection in bronchiectasis.

Peripheral Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Bronchiectasis: A Marker of Disease Severity

Most patients with bronchiectasis have a predominantly neutrophilic inflammatory profile, although other cells such as lymphocytes (as controllers of bronchial inflammation) and eosinophils also play a significant pathophysiological role. Easy-to-interpret blood biomarkers with a discriminative capacity for severity or prognosis are needed. The objective of this study was to assess whether the peripheral neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with different outcomes of severity in bronchiectasis. A total of 1369 patients with bronchiectasis from the Spanish Registry of Bronchiectasis were included. To compare groups, the sample was divided into increasing quartiles of NLR ratio. Correlations between quantitative variables were established using Pearson's P test. A simple linear regression (with the value of exacerbations as a quantitative variable) was used to determine the independent relationship between the number and severity of exacerbations and the NLR ratio. The area under the curve (AUC)-ROC was used to determine the predictive capacity of the NLR for severe bronchiectasis, according to the different multidimensional scores. Mean age: 69 (15) years (66.3% of women). The mean NLR was 2.92 (2.03). A higher NLR was associated with more severe bronchiectasis (with an especially significant discriminative power for severe forms) according to the commonly used scores (FACED, E-FACED and BSI), as well as with poorer quality of life (SGRQ), more comorbidities (Charlson index), infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and greater application of treatment. Furthermore, the NLR correlated better with severity scores than other parameters of systemic inflammation. Finally, it was an independent predictor of the incident number and severity of exacerbations. In conclusion, the NLR is an inexpensive and easy-to-measure marker of systemic inflammation for determining severity and predicting exacerbations (especially the most severe) in patients with bronchiectasis.

Practical tips in bronchiectasis for Primary Care

Bronchiectasis is the third most common chronic inflammatory airway disease, after chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma with a prevalence clearly underestimated probably because of its clinical similitudes with other chronic airway diseases. Bronchiectasis can be caused by a dozen of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary diseases and a variable number and severity of exacerbations can appear throughout its natural history, usually with an infectious profile. The dilation of the airway and the inflammation/infection is their radiological and pathophysiological hallmarks. Primary Care should play an important play in many aspects of the bronchiectasis assessment. In this article, we will try to offer a series of important concepts and practical tips on some key aspects of the diagnosis and management of bronchiectasis in Primary Care: clinical suspicion, diagnostic methods, severity assessment, overlap with asthma and COPD and microbiological and therapeutic aspects.

Inhaled Corticosteroids in Adults with Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: From Bench to Bedside. A Narrative Review

Due to their potent anti-inflammatory capacity (particularly in predominantly eosinophilic inflammation) and immunosuppressive properties, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are widely used in asthmatic patients and also in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who suffer multiple exacerbations or have peripheral eosinophilia. However, there is little evidence for their use in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (hereafter, bronchiectasis). According to data extracted from large databases of bronchiectasis in adults, ICSs are used in more than 50% of patients without any scientific evidence to justify their efficacy and contrary to the recommendations of international guidelines on bronchiectasis that generally advise against their use. Indeed, bronchiectasis is a disease with predominantly neutrophilic inflammation and a high likelihood of chronic bacterial bronchial infection. Furthermore, it is known that due to their immunosuppressive properties, ICSs can induce an increase in bacterial infections. This manuscript aims to review the basic properties of ICSs, how they impact bronchiectasis in adults, the current position of international guidelines on this treatment, and the current indications and future challenges related to ICS use in bronchiectasis.

Impact of Chronic Bronchial Infection by Staphylococcus aureus on Bronchiectasis

The objective of the study was to analyze the factors associated with chronic bronchial infection (CBI) due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and assess the clinical impact on severity, exacerbations, hospitalizations, and loss of lung function compared to patients with no isolation of PPMs in a large longitudinal series of patients from the Spanish bronchiectasis registry (RIBRON). Material and methods: A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study was conducted with patients included in the RIBRON registry between January 2015 and October 2020. The inclusion criteria were an age of 18 years or older and an initial diagnosis of bronchiectasis. Patients recorded in the registry had a situation of clinical stability in the absence of an exacerbation in the four weeks before their inclusion. All patients were encouraged to provide a sputum sample at each visit for microbiological culture. Annual pulmonary function tests were performed according to the national spirometry guidelines. Results: A total of 426 patients were ultimately included in the study: 77 patients (18%) with CBI due to SA and 349 (82%) who did not present any isolation of PPMs in sputum. The mean age was 66.9 years (16.2), and patients 297 (69.7%) were female, with an average BMI of 25.1 (4.7) kg/m2 and an average Charlson index of 1.74 (1.33). The mean baseline value of FEV1 2 L was 0.76, with a mean FEV1% of 78.8% (23.1). One hundred and seventy-two patients (40.4%) had airflow obstruction with FEV1/FVC < 0.7. The mean predictive FACED score was 1.62 (1.41), with a mean value of 2.62 (2.07) for the EFACED score and 7.3 (4.5) for the BSI score. Patients with CBI caused by SA were younger (p < 0.0001), and they had a lower BMI (p = 0.024) and more exacerbations in the previous year (p = 0.019), as well as in the first, second, and third years of follow-up (p = 0.020, p = 0.001, and p = 0.018, respectively). As regards lung function, patients with CBI due to SA had lower levels of FEV1% at the time of inclusion in the registry (p = 0.021), and they presented more frequently with bronchial obstruction (p = 0.042). A lower age (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94−0.99; p < 0.001), lower FEV1 value% (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97−0.99; p = 0.035), higher number of affected lobes (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.2−1.95; p < 0.001), and the presence of two or more exacerbations in the previous year (OR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.15−4.69; p = 0.018) were observed as independent factors associated with CBI due to SA. The reduction in FEv1% in all patients included in the study was −0.31%/year (95% CI: −0.7; −0.07) (p = 0.110). When the reduction in FEv1% is analyzed in the group of patients with CBI due to SA and the group without pathogens, we observed that the reduction in FEV1% was −1.19% (95% CI: −2.09, −0.69) (p < 0.001) in the first group and −0.02% (95% CI: −0.07, −0.01) (p = 0.918) in the second group. According to a linear regression model (mixed effects) applied to determine which factors were associated with a more pronounced reduction in FEv1% in the overall group (including those with CBI due to SA and those with no PPM isolation), age (p = 0.0019), use of inhaled corticosteroids (p = 0.004), presence of CBI due to SA (p = 0.007), female gender (p < 0.001), and the initial value of FEV1 (p < 0.001) were significantly related. Conclusions: Patients with non-CF bronchiectasis with CBI due to SA were younger, with lower FEV1% values, more significant extension of bronchiectasis, and a higher number of exacerbations of mild to moderate symptoms than those with no PPM isolation in respiratory secretions. The reduction in FEV1% was −1.19% (95% CI: −2.09, −0.69) (p < 0.001) in patients with CBI caused by SA.

Blood Neutrophil Counts Define Specific Clusters of Bronchiectasis Patients: A Hint to Differential Clinical Phenotypes

We sought to investigate differential phenotypic characteristics according to neutrophil counts, using a biostatistics approach in a large-cohort study from the Spanish Online Bronchiectasis Registry (RIBRON). The 1034 patients who met the inclusion criteria were clustered into two groups on the basis of their blood neutrophil levels. Using the Mann-Whitney U test to explore potential differences according to FACED and EFACED scores between the two groups, a neutrophil count of 4990 cells/µL yielded the most balanced cluster sizes: (1) above-threshold (n = 337) and (2) below-threshold (n = 697) groups. Patients above the threshold showed significantly worse lung function parameters and nutritional status, while systemic inflammation levels were higher than in the below-threshold patients. In the latter group, the proportions of patients with mild disease were greater, while a more severe disease was present in the above-threshold patients. According to the blood neutrophil counts using biostatistics analyses, two distinct clinical phenotypes of stable patients with non-CF bronchiectasis were defined. Patients falling into the above-threshold cluster were more severe. Severity was characterized by a significantly impaired lung function parameters and nutritional status, and greater systemic inflammation. Phenotypic profiles of bronchiectasis patients are well defined as a result of the cluster analysis of combined systemic and respiratory variables.

Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers Define Specific Clusters in Patients with Bronchiectasis: A Large-Cohort Study

Differential phenotypic characteristics using data mining approaches were defined in a large cohort of patients from the Spanish Online Bronchiectasis Registry (RIBRON). Three differential phenotypic clusters (hierarchical clustering, scikit-learn library for Python, and agglomerative methods) according to systemic biomarkers: neutrophil, eosinophil, and lymphocyte counts, C reactive protein, and hemoglobin were obtained in a patient large-cohort (n = 1092). Clusters #1-3 were named as mild, moderate, and severe on the basis of disease severity scores. Patients in cluster #3 were significantly more severe (FEV1, age, colonization, extension, dyspnea (FACED), exacerbation (EFACED), and bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) scores) than patients in clusters #1 and #2. Exacerbation and hospitalization numbers, Charlson index, and blood inflammatory markers were significantly greater in cluster #3 than in clusters #1 and #2. Chronic colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and COPD prevalence were higher in cluster # 3 than in cluster #1. Airflow limitation and diffusion capacity were reduced in cluster #3 compared to clusters #1 and #2. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis further confirmed these results. Similar results were obtained after excluding COPD patients. Clustering analysis offers a powerful tool to better characterize patients with bronchiectasis. These results have clinical implications in the management of the complexity and heterogeneity of bronchiectasis patients.

Rationale and Clinical Use of Bronchodilators in Adults with Bronchiectasis

Currently, there is much controversy surrounding the therapeutic approach to pulmonary function abnormalities in patients with bronchiectasis and, consequently, whether and when to use bronchodilators in these patients. National and international guidelines on the treatment of bronchiectasis in adults do not recommend the routine use of bronchodilators because there is no evidence that a significant response to a bronchodilator or the presence or hyperresponsiveness of the airway are good predictors of future effective clinical response. However, some guidelines recommend them in the presence of airway obstruction and/or special conditions, which vary according to the guideline in question, although there are no recommendations on optimal dosing and bronchodilator treatment combined with or without inhaled corticosteroids. Nonetheless, in contrast with guideline recommendations, bronchodilators are overused in real-world patients with bronchiectasis even in the absence of airway obstruction, as demonstrated by analysis of national and international registries. This overuse can be explained by the awareness of the existence of a solid pharmacological rationale that supports the use of bronchodilators in the presence of chronic airway obstruction independent of its aetiology. We performed a systematic review of the literature and were able to verify that there are no randomised controlled trials (apart from a small study with methodological limitations and a very recent trial involving a not-very-large number of patients), or any long-term observational studies on the short- or long-term effect of bronchodilators in patients with bronchiectasis. Therefore, we believe that it is essential and even urgent to evaluate the effects of bronchodilators in these patients with appropriately designed studies.

Phenotypic Clustering in Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis Patients: The Role of Eosinophils in Disease Severity

Whether high blood eosinophil counts may define a better phenotype in bronchiectasis patients, as shown in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), remains to be investigated. Differential phenotypic characteristics according to eosinophil counts were assessed using a biostatistical approach in a large cohort study from the Spanish Online Bronchiectasis Registry (RIBRON). The 906 patients who met the inclusion criteria were clustered into two groups on the basis of their eosinophil levels. The potential differences according to the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) score between two groups (Mann–Whitney U test and eosinophil count threshold: 100 cells/µL) showed the most balanced cluster sizes: above-threshold and below-threshold groups. Patients above the threshold exhibited significantly better clinical outcomes, lung function, and nutritional status, while showing lower systemic inflammation levels. The proportion of patients with mild disease was higher in the above-threshold group, while the below-threshold patients were more severe. Two distinct clinical phenotypes of stable patients with non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis of a wide range of disease severity were established on the basis of blood eosinophil counts using a biostatistical approach. Patients classified within the above-threshold cluster were those exhibiting a mild disease, significantly better clinical outcomes, lung function, and nutritional status while showing lower systemic inflammatory levels. These results will contribute to better characterizing bronchiectasis patients into phenotypic profiles with their clinical implications.

Differences in Nutritional Status and Inflammatory Biomarkers between Female and Male Patients with Bronchiectasis: A Large-Cohort Study

We hypothesized that systemic inflammatory and nutritional parameters may differ between male and female patients with non-CF bronchiectasis. In a large patient cohort from the Spanish Online Bronchiectasis Registry (RIBRON), clinical features, systemic inflammatory and nutritional parameters were analyzed in male and female patients with bronchiectasis. Lung function, disease severity using several scores, nutritional status, systemic inflammatory parameters, and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify differences between male and female patients in the target variables. The number of female patients included in the registry was greater than male patients and they had a less severe disease as measured by all three indices of disease severity, a lower degree of airway obstruction, worse diffusion capacity and airway trapping, better nutritional parameters, and lower levels of inflammatory biomarkers. Multivariate regression analysis evidenced that strong relationships were found between female gender and the following variables: total numbers of leukocytes and neutrophils, hemoglobin, hematocrit, creatinine, and body mass index (BMI). Multivariate regression analyses evidenced that nutritional parameters and inflammatory biomarkers may be reliable indicators of gender-related differences in patients with non-CF bronchiectasis. These findings deserve further attention in follow-up investigations in which the potential predictive value of those biomarkers should be thoroughly explored.

Neutrophils to Lymphocyte Ratio as a Biomarker in Bronchiectasis Exacerbation: A Retrospective Study

Introduction

Bronchiectasis is a disorder resulting mainly from bronchial inflammation caused by recurrent or chronic infections. It is characterized by permanently dilated airways due to bronchial wall destruction. Exacerbations have a key role in bronchiectasis as they are associated with a negative impact on patient prognosis. Exacerbations are generally infectious events caused mostly by bacterial microorganisms. Infective or inflammatory agents cause neutrophil recruitment into the airways, which leads to proteolytic enzymes such as neutrophil elastase and matrix metalloproteinases release, resulting in airway matrix destruction. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is used as a biomarker of inflammation. It is calculated by dividing the number of neutrophils by the number of lymphocytes. Our aim is to evaluate Neutrophils to Lymphocyte Ratio in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation and its correlation to microbiological data.

Methods 

The study involved patients with a diagnosis of bronchiectasis based on high-resolution computerised tomography (HRCT) of the chest who fulfilled the criteria of bronchiectasis exacerbation. Complete blood counts with differential counts, which included total white blood cells, neutrophils and lymphocytes, were obtained. NLR and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation and in healthy controls. NLR was calculated as the ratio of the neutrophils to lymphocytes. The mean NLR values in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation were compared to mean NLR values in healthy controls. The NLR values were compared to CRP levels in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation. Sputum cultures were performed in all patients. The mean NLR values in patients with positive sputum cultures were compared with mean NLR values in patients with negative sputum cultures, and mean NLR values in patients with isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa in sputum cultures were compared to mean NLR values in patients with other infectious agents isolated.

Results

The study population consisted of 80 patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation - 54 males and 26 females - with a mean age of 77.3±8.4 years, and 64 healthy controls - 36 males and 28 females - with a mean age of 62.9±15.3 years. The mean CRP levels in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation were 75.03±73.87 mg/l. The mean NLR value in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation was 9.2±7.8 and the mean NLR value of controls was 3.1±2.9 (p<0.001). The NLR values in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation had no linear correlation with CRP values in these patients (r=0.002, p=0.992). Fifty-two patients had positive sputum cultures and 28 patients had negative sputum cultures. The mean NLR value in patients with positive sputum cultures was 10.5±9.1, and in patients with negative sputum cultures, it was 6.7±3.6 (p<0.012). The mean NLR value in patients with P.aeruginosa was 10.1±9.5, and in patients with other microorganisms isolated, it was 10.8±8.9 (p=0.784).

Conclusions

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio values are statistically greater in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation compared to healthy controls. There is no linear correlation between NLR and CRP in these patients. NLR values are statistically greater in patients with positive sputum cultures compared to those with negative sputum cultures. Therefore, NLR can be used for predicting positive cultures in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation.