Smad2 overexpression enhances adhesion of gingival epithelial cells

Role of integrins in wound repair and its periodontal implications

Wound healing in human periodontium is a complex process which involves both cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Integrins play a major role in regulation of these cell-cell, cell-matrix interaction. Wound healing involves two major events i.e. re-epithelialization and connective tissue repair. In this concise review, we will discuss the role of integrins in these major events as well as their impIications in periodontal wound repair. Integrins are differentially expressed in both of these major events. In re-epithelialization, keratinocytes express novel integrins receptors αvβ1, α5β1and αvβ6 which are not expressed in normal healthy epithelium. Re-epithelialization also involves interaction of integrins with TGF-β and fibronectin. Similarly, in connective tissue repair, the activation of fibroblast as well as the expression of integrins α5β1 and α3β1 is upregulated. In healthy periodontium, integrin αvβ6 is normally expressed in junctional epithelium which is generally expressed only at wound sites in other parts of the body. The epithelialization at implant surface has not been yet fully explored with respect to interactions among integrins and other extra-cellular matrix molecules.

Modulation of microenvironment for controlling the fate of periodontal ligament cells: the role of Rho/ROCK signaling and cytoskeletal dynamics

Cells behave in a variety of ways when they perceive changes in their microenvironment; the behavior of cells is guided by their coordinated interactions with growth factors, niche cells, and extracellular matrix (ECM). Modulation of the microenvironment affects the cell morphology and multiple gene expressions. Rho/Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase (ROCK) signaling is one of the key regulators of cytoskeletal dynamics and actively and/or passively determines the cell fate, such as proliferation, migration, differentiation, and apoptosis, by reciprocal communication with the microenvironment. During periodontal wound healing, it is important to recruit the residential stem cells into the defect site for regeneration and homeostasis of the periodontal tissue. Periodontal ligament (PDL) cells contain a heterogeneous fibroblast population, including mesenchymal stem cells, and contribute to the reconstruction of tooth-supporting tissues. Therefore, bio-regeneration of PDL cells has been the ultimate goal of periodontal therapy for decades. Recent stem cell researches have shed light on intrinsic ECM properties, providing paradigm shifts in cell fate determination. This review focuses on the role of ROCK activity and the effects of Y-27632, a specific inhibitor of ROCK, in the modulation of ECM-microenvironment. Further, it presents the current understanding of how Rho/ROCK signaling affects the fate determination of stem cells, especially PDL cells. In addition, we have also discussed in detail the underlying mechanisms behind the reciprocal response to the microenvironment.

Immunolocalization of connective tissue growth factor, transforming growth factor-beta1 and phosphorylated-SMAD2/3 during the postnatal tooth development and formation of junctional epithelium

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is a downstream mediator of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β₁) and TGF-β₁-induced CTGF expression is regulated through SMAD pathway. However, there is no literature showing the expression of TGF-β₁-SMAD2/3-CTGF signaling pathway during postnatal tooth development and the formation of junctional epithelium (JE). Hence, we aimed to analyze the localization of TGF-β₁, CTGF and phosphorylated SMAD2/3 (p-SMAD2/3) in the developing postnatal rat molars. Wistar rats were killed at postnatal (PN) 0.5, 3.5, 7, 14 and 21days and the upper jaws were processed for immunohistochemistry. At PN0.5 and PN3.5, weak staining for TGF-β₁ and CTGF was evident in preameloblasts (PA), while moderate to strong staining was seen in odontoblasts (OD), dental papilla (DPL), secretary ameloblasts (SA), preodontoblasts (PO) and polarized odontoblasts (PoO). There was no staining for p-SMAD2/3 in PA, SA, PO and PoO, although strong staining was localized in DPL. OD was initially moderately positive and then negative for p-SMAD2/3. At PN7, intense staining for TGF-β₁ and CTGF was observed in SA, OD, dental pulp (DP) and predentin respectively. p-SMAD2/3 was strongly expressed in DP and moderately expressed in SA and OD. At PN14 and PN21, both reduced enamel epithelium (REE) and JE showed a strong reaction for TGF-β₁ and CTGF. p-SMAD2/3 was intensely and weakly expressed in REE and JE respectively. These data demonstrate that the expression of CTGF, TGF-β₁ and p-SNAD2/3 is tissue-specific and stage-specific, and indicate a regulatory role for a TGF-β₁-SMAD2/3-CTGF signaling pathway in amelogenesis, dentinogenesis and formation of JE.

Differential expression of transforming growth factor-beta1, connective tissue growth factor, phosphorylated-SMAD2/3 and phosphorylated-ERK1/2 during mouse tooth development

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is a downstream mediator of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β₁) and TGF-β₁-induced CTGF expression is regulated through SMAD and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. The fine modulation of TGF-β₁ signaling is very important to the process of tooth development. However, little is known about the localization of CTGF, MAPK and SMAD in the context of TGF-β₁ signaling during odontogenesis. Hence, we aimed to investigate the expression of TGF-β₁, CTGF, phosphorylated-SMAD2/3 (p-SMAD2/3) and phosphorylated-ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2). ICR mice heads of embryonic (E) day 13.5, E14.5, E16.5, postnatal (PN) day 0.5 and PN3.5 were processed for immunohistochemistry. Results revealed that at E13.5, TGF-β₁ and CTGF were strongly expressed in dental epithelium (DE) and dental mesenchyme (DM), while p-SMAD2/3 was intensely expressed in the internal side of DE. p-ERK1/2 was not present in DE or DM. At E14.5 and E16.5, strong staining for TGF-β₁ and CTGF was detected in enamel knot (EK) and dental papilla (DPL). DPL was intensely stained for p-ERK1/2 but negatively stained for p-SMAD2/3. There was no staining for p-SMAD2/3 and p-ERK1/2 in EK. At PN0.5 and PN3.5, moderate to intense staining for TGF-β₁ and CTGF was evident in preameloblasts (PA), secretary ameloblasts (SA) and dental pulp (DP). p-SMAD2/3 was strongly expressed in SA and DP but sparsely localized in PA. p-ERK1/2 was intensely expressed in DP, although negative staining was observed in PA and SA. These data demonstrate that TGF-β₁ and CTGF show an identical expression pattern, while p-SMAD2/3 and p-ERK1/2 exhibit differential expression, and indicate that p-SMAD2/3 and p-ERK1/2 might play a regulatory role in TGF-β₁ induced CTGF expression during tooth development.

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans regulates the expression of integrins and reduces cell adhesion via integrin α5 in human gingival epithelial cells

Gingival epithelial cells form a physiological barrier against bacterial invasion. Excessive bacterial invasion destroys the attachment between the tooth surface and the epithelium, resulting in periodontitis. Integrins play a significant role in cell attachment; therefore, we hypothesized that bacterial infection might decrease the expressions of these integrins in gingival epithelial cells, resulting in reduced cell adhesion. Immortalized human gingival epithelial cells were co-cultured with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans Y4 (Aa Y4), and the gene expression levels of IL-8, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and integrins (α2, α3, α5, β4, and β6) were measured using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Expression of PCNA and integrins, except integrin α5, was significantly downregulated, while expression of IL-8 and integrin α5 was significantly upregulated in the cells co-cultured with Aa Y4. The number of adherent cells significantly decreased when co-cultured with Aa Y4, as determined using cell adhesion assays. In the cells co-cultured with Aa Y4 and an integrin α5 neutralizing antibody, there was no effect on the expression of IL-8 and PCNA, while the expressions of integrins α2, α3, β4, and β6, and the number of adherent cells did not decrease. The number of invading bacteria in the cells was reduced in the presence of the antibody and increased in the presence of TLR2/4 inhibitor. Therefore, integrin α5 might be involved in Aa Y4 invasion into gingival epithelial cells, and the resulting signal transduction cascade reduces cell adhesion by decreasing the expression of integrins, while the TLR2/4 signaling cascade regulates IL-8 expression.