Short-term safety and effectiveness of a second-generation motion-guided total knee system

Comparison of short-term clinical results between modified kinematically-aligned and guided motion bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Both kinematically-aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and bicruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA aim to reproduce the physiological knee kinematics. In this study, we compared the femoro-tibial component rotational mismatch between patients who underwent modified KA-TKA and those who received guided-motion BCS-TKA, and its influence on the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 77 consecutive patients were included and divided into two groups: subjects who underwent modified KA-TKA with Persona (KA Group; n = 42) and those who received BCS-TKA with JOURNEY II (BCS group; n = 35). Range of motion, the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), the rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial components, and the correlations between the rotational mismatch and the 2011 KSS subscales were examined.

RESULTS

The postoperative objective knee indicators (P = 0.0157), patient satisfaction (P = 0.0039) and functional activity scores (P = 0.0013) in the KA group were significantly superior to those in the BCS group 1 year postoperatively. There was no significant difference between the two groups observed in the rotational mismatch. In the BCS group, significant negative correlations were identified between the rotational mismatch and objective indicators, patient satisfaction, and functional activity scores but not in the KA group.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term clinical results following KA-TKA showed superior objective knee indicators, patient satisfaction and functional activity scores. A negative correlation was observed between component rotational mismatch and the 2011 KSS subscales in the BCS group, compared to no relationship found between the two in the KA group. These findings suggested that KA-TKA has a relatively higher tolerance for rotational mismatch than BCS-TKA.

Review of robotic surgery platforms and end effectors

In the last 50 years, the number of companies producing automated devices for surgical operations has grown extensively. The population started to be more confident about the technology capabilities. The first patents related to surgical robotics are expiring and this knowledge is becoming a common base for the development of future surgical robotics. The review describes some of the most popular companies manufacturing surgical robots. The list of the company does not pretend to be exhaustive but wishes to give an overview of the sector. Due to space constraints, only a limited selction of companies is reported. Most of the companies described are born in America or Europe. Advantages and limitations of each product firm are described. A special focus is given to the end effectors; their shape and dexterity are crucial for the positive outcome of the surgical operations. New robots are developed every year, and existing robots are allowed to perform a wider range of procedures. Robotic technologies improve the abilities of surgeons in the domains of urology, gynecology, neurology, spine surgery, orthopedic reconstruction (knee, shoulder), hair restoration, oral surgery, thoracic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and endoscopy.

Low Correlation between Gait and Quality of Life in Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis

Advanced knee osteoarthritis patients' gait usually undergoes alterations leading to decreased mobility and lower functional performance, which can result in a worsening of their quality of life (QoL). While several authors have reported a moderate correlation between gait parameters and QoL assessed by generic questionnaires, the literature is scarce. This study aimed to explore the relationship between gait and QoL parameters assessed by a generic and a disease-specific questionnaire in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. In this single-centre, prospective, observational study, 129 patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis scheduled for elective total knee replacement were selected. The patients' gait was evaluated by means of a validated wireless device while they walked 30 m at a comfortable speed. Patient function was also analysed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). QoL was measured with the EQ-5D and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaires. Patients showed a mean walking speed of 0.95 ± 0.19 m/s, a mean cadence of 105.6 ± 9.9 steps/min, and a mean stride length of 1.25 ± 0.17 m on both legs. They presented poor knee status (KSS < 60) and poor QoL, with an EQ-5D of 0.44 ± 0.24 and a total KOOS of 29.77 ± 13.99. Positive low correlations (r <0.5, p <0.5) were found only between the speed, propulsion and stride length of both legs, and the overall and ADLs subscale scores of the total KOOS questionnaire. In conclusion, several gait parameters have a significant low correlation with the QoL of patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis, as assessed by an osteoarthritis-specific questionnaire.

Restoring Anatomical Features in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Today, the number of people affected by gonarthrosis symptoms is increasing proportionally. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful intervention that aims to reduce pain and restore knee function. However, studies have shown that active young patients still have limitations in performing activities such as skiing, golfing, surfing, and dancing. Over the last few years, total knee arthroplasty has undergone significant changes. Most of the modern TKA implants are designed to reproduce the normal biomechanics of the knee joint, mimicking the physiological pattern with greater compliance in the medial compartment between the tibial insert and femoral condyle and less congruence on the lateral side. Unfortunately, functional outcomes are compromised in approximately half of TKA patients. This loss may be caused by the abnormal kinematics and inherent instability of many contemporary implants. The proper alignment of the femoral component during TKA is a crucial step that influences postoperative results. The position of the femoral component in the axial plane is responsible for flexion stability, knee joint kinematics, flexion alignment, and patellar tracking. The main goal when choosing a type of prosthesis is to achieve an adequate recovery that leads to an improvement in mobility and an increase in the efficiency of the quadriceps.

Short-Term functional comparison of three total knee arthroplasties-Journey II, Genesis II and Profix

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the outcomes of three knee arthroplasty design philosophies and surface tribology.• A zirconium-surfaced, bicruciate-stabilised implant designed to mimic kinematic movement and improve flexion and outcomes;• A cobalt-chrome surfaced, multi-radius design with built-in femoral external rotation to aid balancing and patella tracking through a deeper trochlea groove;• A zirconium-surfaced, single-radius implant designed on surface conformity, particularly within the patello-femoral joint.

METHODS

313 knee replacements - 103 Journey II, 103 Genesis II and 107 Profix - were statistically assessed at a minimum of 2 years using WOMAC, Oxford and SF-12 scores, and range of movement.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the actual or unit change in WOMAC scores (p = 0.140 and p = 0.287), SF-12 physical (p = 0.088) or mental scores (p = 0.975) between the three implants; or between the actual or unit change in Oxford score (p = 0.912 and p = 0.874) for the Journey II or Genesis II. The Journey II produced more flexion and range of movement than the Genesis II (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018) and Profix (p < 0.001 and <0.001) with no difference between the latter two (p = 0.402 and 0.568); with no difference in extension between the three implants (p = 0.086). There was no difference between those with or without a resurfaced patella.

CONCLUSION

The three design philosophies and surfaces yielded no difference in outcome scores at 2 years post-operatively. The Journey II demonstrated better post-operative flexion. Resurfacing the patella did not alter the outcome scores or flexion.

Early outcomes using a 'kinematic retaining' total knee replacement - A multicentre prospective study at two years follow-up

BACKGROUND

Although predictable implant longevity in total knee replacement (TKR) is now established, work continues to satisfy the demands of patients who seek full restoration of the painless function of the native knee following TKR. This prospective study examines the early clinical outcomes of 156 patients implanted with a novel 'kinematic-retaining' (KR) implant.

METHODS

156 Physica KR TKRs were implanted for primary osteoarthritis at three European centres. Patients were reviewed up to two years using radiographic, clinical and functional evaluations.

RESULTS

Of the 137 patients retained at two years' follow up, none had been revised. Within 6 post-operative months, 51.7% and 79.9% had excellent clinical and functional KSS values respectively, increasing to 81.8% and 88.3% beyond two years. Mean KSS improvement was 34.8 (from 48.6 to 83.4). All KOOS sub-scores improved significantly with total KOOS improving from a mean of 35.5 (SD ±13.0) to 86.5 (±13.7) at two years post-operatively. Pain and sports KOOS sub-scores improved rapidly during the early post-operative periods, with sustained improvements beyond this. Mean OKS improved by 44.1 (±5.1) at two years. VAS satisfaction scores improved significantly at all time points beyond six weeks. Mean FJS-12 was 75.7 at two years, with no significant effects of age or gender. No progressive adverse radiographic features were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of this kinematic-retaining knee prosthesis are promising, with improvements in clinical parameters similar to, or exceeding those published in other contemporary TKR designs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Multicentre Prospective cohort study.

Rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components should be avoided in JOURNEY II bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

JOURNEY II bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) knee system, a guided motion total knee arthroplasty (TKA), has been reported to reproduce physiological knee kinematic motion with good clinical outcomes. However, this guided system may be sensitive to the femorotibial rotational alignment.

METHOD

Forty-four patients (50 knees) who underwent JOURNEY II BCS TKA were included in this retrospective study. The 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) and range of motion were assessed pre-operatively and one year postoperatively. The femoral component rotational angle relative to the surgical epicondylar axis and the tibial component rotational angle relative to Akagi's line were measured postoperatively. The absolute difference between the femoral and tibial component rotational angles was defined as femorotibial component rotational mismatch. The correlation between the parameters of these rotational alignments and postoperative clinical outcomes was evaluated. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off point of the femorotibial component rotational mismatch.

RESULTS

Mean femoral and tibial component rotational angles were 0.4° (internal rotation) and 0.7° (external rotation), respectively. The rotational mismatch of the femorotibial component was 3.2°. There were negative correlations between femorotibial rotational mismatch and clinical outcomes, including objective knee indicators, patient satisfaction, functional activities, and total 2011 KSS. The area under the curve of the femorotibial component rotational mismatch was 0.768 and the cut-off value identified by the Youden index was 2.8°.

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive rotational mismatch between the femoral and tibial components can negatively influence the clinical outcomes of JOURNEY II BCS TKA.

Migration and Inducible Displacement of the Bicruciate-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gap Balancing and Measured Resection Techniques

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study is to investigate the migration and inducible displacement of a bicruciate-stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty implanted using gap balancing (GB) or measured resection (MR) surgical techniques. We hypothesized equal migration and displacement between the techniques.

METHODS

The study is a single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial, with allocation of 71 patients to either GB or MR groups. Fifteen patients were withdrawn, resulting in 31 patients in the GB group and 25 in the MR group. Patients received the JOURNEY II™ BCS implant. Migration and inducible displacement were evaluated using radiostereometric analysis and patient examinations were performed at a 2-week baseline, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperation.

RESULTS

No differences (P > .05) existed between GB and MR groups for any measurement of tibial or femoral migration. Both groups had tibial migrations below 0.5 mm from baseline to 6 months, and below 0.2 mm from both 6 months to 1 year and 1-2 years postoperation. No differences (P > .05) were found between GB and MR groups for inducible displacement.

CONCLUSION

No differences were found in implant migration or inducible displacement between GB and MR groups. The BCS implant can be expected to have migration risks on par with industry standards and both surgical techniques are safe and effective options for implantation of this implant design.

Maximal flexion and patient outcomes after TKA, using a bicruciate-stabilizing design

INTRODUCTION

Physiological motion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) should result in a large range of motion, which would lead to good clinical outcomes. An adjusted design of a bicruciate-stabilizing TKA was developed to reproduce physiological motion. The aim of this study was to (1) investigate the maximal knee flexion of this knee system, 1 year post-operatively; (2) determine the clinical and functional improvement and compare the outcomes between patients with and without high maximal flexion; and (3) evaluate the adverse events.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 62 patients with osteoarthritis received a bicruciate-stabilizing TKA. Maximum flexion was measured on a lateral X-ray pre- and post-operatively. Clinical and functional scores and the adverse events were reported up until 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Pre-operatively, the median (range) maximal flexion was 131.5 (90-153)° and 1 year post-operatively, it was 130 (82-150)°. The results for the clinical scores showed an improvement between pre-operative values and post-operative values. The Kujala score and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) symptoms, sport and quality of life score were better in patients with high maximal flexion (≥ 125°). Ten (serious) adverse device events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the bicruciate-stabilizing TKA obtained a maximal flexion comparable to the flexion pre-operatively and resulted in good clinical and functional outcomes. Patients with high flexion ability seem to perform better on clinical and functional outcomes. Furthermore, the adjusted design of the bicruciate-stabilizing TKA reduced the number of adverse events.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Midterm Performance of a Guided-Motion Bicruciate-Stabilized Total Knee System: Results From the International Study of Over 2000 Consecutive Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

The JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilizing Total Knee System (BLINDED) is a second-generation guided-motion knee implant that has been used in over 100,000 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) worldwide. However, performance information is limited.

METHODS

Data for 2059 primary TKAs were abstracted at 7 US and 3 European sites. Estimates of cumulative incidence of revision were compared with registry data for cemented posterior-stabilized implants.

RESULTS

Average age was 64.3 years (range, 18-91); 58.5% were females; and 12.3% TKAs were in subjects younger than 55 years. Patellae were resurfaced in 95.9%. Median time since primary TKA was 4.2 years; longest was 6.1 years; and 78.9% were 3 years or more since primary TKA. Of 67 revisions (3.2%), 20 (30%) involved femoral or tibial component removal compared to 42% in the Australian Joint Registry (Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry). All-component revisions accounted for 15 of 67, femoral component only for 2 of 67, tibial component only for 3 of 67, patellar component with/without tibial insert exchange for 17 of 67, and isolated tibial insert exchange for 30 of 67. In addition, there were 18 reoperations without component exchange. Component revision indications were infection (33%), mechanical loosening (21%), fracture of bone around the joint (16%), and instability (15%). Kaplan-Meier revision estimate was 3.1 and 3.6 per 100 TKAs at 3 and 5 years, respectively, compared to Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry estimates of 3.1 and 4.1 per 100 TKAs.

CONCLUSION

The revision rate for the second-generation implant was similar to cemented posterior-stabilized registry controls.