The relationship between expectations and satisfaction in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty

Combining preoperative expectations and postoperative met expectations to predict patient-reported outcomes after knee surgery

Introduction

Both preoperative expectations and postoperative met expectations can independently influence patient-reported outcomes (PROs), however, their combined effect on PROs is not well understood. This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of categorizing non-arthroplasty knee surgery patients into clusters based on both preoperative expectations and postoperative met expectations.

Methods

638 patients who underwent non-arthroplasty knee surgery from June 2015 to May 2021 at a single academic institution were analyzed. Patients were grouped based on both preoperative expectations and two-year postoperative met expectations scores using cluster analysis. Four distinct expectations cluster groups were formed: high preoperative-high met expectations (HIGH-HIGH), low preoperative-high met expectations (LOW-HIGH), high preoperative-low met expectations (HIGH-LOW), and low preoperative-low met expectations (LOW-LOW). Socioeconomic data and PROs were compared based on cluster group, and logistic regression was performed to determine the likelihood of achieving a patient-perceived "completely better" status based on cluster group.

Results

Patients with high met expectations, regardless of preoperative expectations, reported better two-year PROs compared to patients with low met expectations. Patients with high preoperative expectations achieved better outcomes only when those expectations were met postoperatively. Low preoperative expectations did not preclude patients from achieving good outcomes, as long as those expectations were met. The HIGH-HIGH group had increased odds of achieving completely better status compared to the LOW-HIGH group (OR = 1.68, p = .02), HIGH-LOW group (OR = 16.69, p < .001), and LOW-LOW group (OR = 5.17, p < .001). The HIGH-LOW group had decreased odds of achieving completely better status compared to the LOW-LOW group (OR = .31, p = .01).

Conclusion

Met expectations may be a stronger predictor of postoperative outcomes than preoperative expectations in non-arthroplasty knee surgery. This study highlights the importance of setting realistic preoperative expectations and focusing on achieving expectations postoperatively. These findings offer valuable insights for clinicians to manage patient expectations effectively based on individual characteristics and expected treatment outcomes.

Patient Personality Influences Early Overall Satisfaction Following Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Up to 20% of patients report dissatisfaction following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes do not fully explain dissatisfaction. Dispositional personality traits are related to health behaviors and outcomes. We evaluated the relationship between patient personality and early overall satisfaction after TJA.

METHODS

Elective unilateral primary TJAs (n = 377) were prospectively enrolled. The sample consisted of 61% women, with an average age and body mass index of 67 years (range, 31 to 89) and 35 (range, 15 to 62), respectively. A validated personality assessment was administered preoperatively. Satisfaction was measured at a mean of 4.8 (range, 2.5 to 6.4) months postoperatively, as were other covariates, including whether expectations for pain and functional improvement were met, joint health scores, mental and physical health, and health literacy. Patient sex, race, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification, surgeon, procedure type, and complications within 90 days of surgery also served as covariates. Variables significantly related to being satisfied with TJA were analyzed using binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Patient-reported satisfaction was 80% for improvement in recreational activities, 86% for improvement in the ability to perform housework and yardwork, and 93% for pain relief and the overall result of surgery. In multivariable analyses, each unit increase in the personality trait open-mindedness increased overall and pain relief satisfaction by 3.87 and 2.65 times, respectively (P ≤ 0.012), as did each unit increase in expectations being met (2.33 and 5.87 times, respectively, P ≤ 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistics indicated that accounting for open-mindedness enhanced the classification of satisfied and not satisfied patients beyond accounting for whether expectations were met.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient personality influences early patient-reported satisfaction after TJA, warranting careful consideration when using this metric to assess surgical effectiveness and reimbursement.

A Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with Guarded Outcome after Carpal Tunnel Release in Symptomatic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) is a validated measurement tool to assess the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome, and improvements in the BCTQ after carpal tunnel release (CTR) have been demonstrated to influence patient satisfaction. The authors hypothesized that patient-related factors influence response in BCTQ subscales, including the Symptom Severity Scale and the Functional Status Scale, after CTR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery with follow-up BCTQ were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Paired t tests were used to compare BCTQ subscales at each follow-up time point. Minimal clinically important differences were set. Patients below these thresholds were deemed as having failure to improve after CTR. Univariate analysis was used to identify risk factors for failure to improve after CTR. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors for failure to improve after CTR.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients demonstrated significant improvements at all follow-up time points. The factor most associated with improvement beyond the minimal clinically important differences was a more severe score in the respective domain assessed. Other independent factors that influenced outcome after CTR included race, concomitant cubital tunnel release, sex, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

CTR results in significant improvements in BCTQ and its subscales, with improvements stabilizing after 6 weeks. In a select cohort of patients, failure to improve after CTR occurs with factors independently associated with a lower degree of improvement. Identification of patients with these risk factors will provide a basis for counseling and increased monitoring of patients at risk for a guarded prognosis.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport (RTS) and RTS Rates Are Similar in Patients After Either Bilateral or Unilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Purpose

To compare psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS), RTS rate, level of return, and time to return between patients who underwent bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and those who underwent unilateral ACLR.

Methods

The electronic medical record at a single academic medical center was queried for patients who underwent ACLR from January 2012 to May 2020. The inclusion criteria were skeletally mature patients who underwent either single or sequential bilateral ACLR and who had undergone either the primary ACLR or second contralateral ACLR at least 2 years earlier. Bilateral ACLRs were matched 1:3 to unilateral reconstructions based on age, sex, and body mass index. Psychological readiness to RTS was assessed using the validated ACL Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale. This, along with time to return and level of RTS, was compared between the 2 cohorts.

Results

In total, 170 patients were included, of whom 44 underwent bilateral ACLR and 132 underwent unilateral ACLR. At the time of the first surgical procedure, patients in the unilateral cohort were aged 28.8 ± 9.4 years and those in the bilateral cohort were aged 25.7 ± 9.8 years (P = .06). The average time difference between the first and second surgical procedures was 28.4 ± 22.3 months. There was no difference in psychological readiness to RTS (50.5 in bilateral cohort vs 48.1 in unilateral cohort, P = .66), RTS rate (78.0% in unilateral cohort vs 65.9% in bilateral cohort, P = .16), percentage of return to preinjury sport level (61.2% in unilateral cohort vs 69.0% in bilateral cohort, P = .21), or time to return (41.2 ± 29.3 weeks in unilateral cohort vs 35.2 ± 23.7 weeks in bilateral cohort, P = .31) between the 2 cohorts.

Conclusions

Compared with patients who undergo unilateral ACLR, patients who undergo bilateral ACLR are equally as psychologically ready to RTS, showing equal rates of RTS, time to return, and level of return.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Preoperative education on realistic expectations improves the satisfaction of patients with central sensitization after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized-controlled trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether an additional module on realistic expectations following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would lead to a higher proportion of satisfied patients compared to existing preoperative education.

METHODS

This was a single-center, randomized-controlled trial. A total of 172 patients who were scheduled for TKA between September 2020 and October 2021 were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either only standard preoperative education, or an additional module on realistic expectations following TKA. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were Short Form-36, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, crepitus score, and range of motion. Subgroup analysis was performed based on central sensitization inventory (CSI) score stratification. Assessment was performed at the 3-month, 6-month, and > 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

At more than 1 year, 65/78 (83.3%) patients in the intervention group and 52/80 (65.0%) patients in the control group were satisfied (P = 0.03). The mean satisfaction score was measured as 4.2 ± 0.9 in the intervention and 3.9 ± 0.9 in the control at > 1 year (P = 0.01). There were significant differences in Short Form-36 physical and mental component summary scores and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and stiffness scores at 6 months (P = 0.02, P = 0.02, P = 0.04, P = 0.04). The frequency of satisfaction and mean satisfaction score in the top 25 percentile CSI group were 15/16 (93.8%) and 4.6 ± 0.6 in those who received intervention and 12/19 (63.2%) and 3.8 ± 0.8 in those who did not (P = 0.01, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Thorough preoperative education on realistic expectations following TKA showed effects on WOMAC pain and satisfaction at > 1 year after surgery. It was more prominent in the group with a higher CSI score at > 1-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Comparing the Effects of Differential and Visuo-Motor Training on Functional Performance, Biomechanical, and Psychological Factors in Athletes after ACL Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Variation during practice is widely accepted to be advantageous for motor learning and is, therefore, a valuable strategy to effectively reduce high-risk landing mechanics and prevent primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Few attempts have examined the specific effects of variable training in athletes who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Thereby, it is still unclear to what extent the variations in different sensor areas lead to different effects. Accordingly, we compared the effects of versatile movement variations (DL) with variations of movements with emphasis on disrupting visual information (VMT) in athletes who had undergone ACL reconstruction. Forty-five interceptive sports athletes after ACL reconstruction were randomly allocated to a DL group (n = 15), VT group (n = 15), or control group (n = 15). The primary outcome was functional performance (Triple Hop Test). The secondary outcomes included dynamic balance (Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT)), biomechanics during single-leg drop-landing task hip flexion (HF), knee flexion (KF), ankle dorsiflexion (AD), knee valgus (KV), and vertical ground reaction force (VGRF), and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)) assessed before and after the 8 weeks of interventions. Data were analyzed by means of 3 × 2 repeated measures ANOVA followed by post hoc comparison (Bonferroni) at the significance level of p ≤ 0.05. Significant group × time interaction effects, main effect of time, and main effect of group were found for the triple hop test and all eight directions, SEBT, HF, KF, AD, KV, VGRF, and TSK. There was no significant main effect of group in the HF and triple hop test. Additionally, significant differences in the triple hop test and the seven directions of SEBT, HF, KF, KV, VGRF, and TSK were found between the control group and the DL and VMT groups. Between group differences in AD and the medial direction of SEBT were not significant. Additionally, there were no significant differences between VMT and the control group in the triple hop test and HF variables. Both motor learning (DL and VMT) programs improved outcomes in patients after ACL reconstruction. The findings suggest that DL and VMT training programs lead to comparable improvements in rehabilitation.

Higher preoperative expectations predict better outcomes in shoulder surgery patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine if preoperative expectations (PE) are an independent predictor of greater 2-year outcomes and greater improvement from baseline in shoulder surgery patients.

METHODS

Two-hundred and sixteen patients who underwent shoulder surgery at one institution were studied. Patients completed both preoperative and 2-year follow-up questionnaires including PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) computer-adaptive testing in six domains, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, shoulder numeric pain scale (NPS), and the Marx Shoulder Activity Rating Scale (MARS). PE were measured using the Musculoskeletal Outcomes and Data Evaluation Management System (MODEMS) expectations domain, and satisfaction was measured via the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8).

RESULTS

The mean PE score was 86.2 ± 17.8. Greater PE were associated with significantly better 2-year scores for ASES, NPS, MARS, SSQ8, and PROMIS domains of Physical Function, Fatigue, Pain Interference Fatigue and Social Satisfaction. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that greater PE were an independent predictor of both better 2-year scores and greater improvement for PROMIS SS (p < 0.001), ASES (p = 0.007), and shoulder NPS (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Greater PE are positively associated with numerous patient-based outcomes 2 years after surgery. With regards to pain relief, shoulder function, and social satisfaction, higher PE are also predictive of better outcome scores and more improvement. This study suggests that preoperative assessment of shoulder surgery PE is important, and that counseling patients to optimize realistic expectations may lead to superior outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Desired Oxford Knee Score Obtained Before Total Knee Arthroplasty is Predictive of the Postoperative Oxford Knee Score: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

The relationship between patient expectations and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not well understood. The purpose of the study was to test the influence of desired knee function on postoperative perceived knee function 1 year after TKA.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients undergoing primary TKA were available for data analyses. Preoperatively, patients completed the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) twice, one representing preoperative function (preoperative OKS); the second representing desired function after TKA (desired OKS). Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity score, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectations Survey (HSS-KRES), Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and EuroQol-visual analogue scales were obtained preoperatively. One year after surgery, all surveys besides the UCLA activity score and HSS-KRES were repeated. The associations between postoperative OKS and WOMAC versus desired OKS and HSS-KRES were assessed using multivariable linear regression models, wherein linear regression coefficients represent the additive effect on the mean postoperative PROM.

RESULTS

The desired OKS was independently associated with the postoperative OKS (linear regression coefficient = 0.43; P = .011), that is, each point increase in desired OKS yielded a 0.43 increase in postoperative OKS. The preoperative OKS showed no association with postoperative PROMs. Desired OKS was correlated with postoperative WOMAC (coefficient = -0.67; P = .014). The HSS-KRES was not associated with the postoperative OKS (coefficient = -0.005; P = .965) or WOMAC (coefficient = 0.18; P = .288).

CONCLUSION

In TKA patients, higher preoperative desired function predict greater postoperative PROMs. Effects of preoperative expectations on outcomes are independent of patient demographics or preoperative function.

Immediate patient perceptions following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: semi-structured multi-centre interviews exploring the patient journey and experiences of lumbar fusion surgery (FuJourn)

PURPOSE

To understand the patient journey to Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery (LSFS) and patients' experiences of surgery.

METHODS

Qualitative study using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Adult participants following LSFS were recruited from 4 UK clinical sites using purposive sampling to ensure representation of key features (e.g. age). Semi-structured interviews informed by a piloted topic guide developed from the literature were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis for individual interviews and then across participants (deductive and inductive) identified emerging themes. Trustworthiness of data analyses was enhanced using multiple strategies (e.g. attention to negative cases).

RESULTS

Four emerging themes from n = 31 patients' narratives were identified: decision for surgery, coping strategies, barriers to recovery and recovery after surgery. Decision for surgery and recovery after surgery themes are distinguished by the point of surgery. However, barriers to recovery and coping strategies are key to the whole patient journey encompassing long journeys to surgery and their initial journey after surgery. The themes of coping strategies and barriers to recovery were inter-related and perceived by participants as parallel concepts. The 4 multifactorial themes interacted with each other and shaped the process of an individual patient's recovery. Factors such as sporadic interventions prior to surgery, time-consuming wait for diagnosis and surgery and lack of information regarding recovery strongly influenced perceptions of outcome.

CONCLUSION

Patient driven data enables insights to inform research regarding surgery/rehabilitation through depth of understanding of the patient journey. Awareness of factors important to patients is important; ensuring that patient-driven data informs research and patient care.

Robotic Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty in High Volume Surgeons: A Comparison of Cost and Quality Metrics

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) was introduced to improve surgical accuracy and patient outcomes. However, RTKA may also increase operating time and add cost to TKA. This study sought to compare the differences in cost and quality measures between manual TKA (MTKA) and RTKA METHODS: All MTKAs and RTKAs performed between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019, by 6 high volume surgeons in each cohort, were retrospectively reviewed. Cohorts were propensity score matched. Operative time, length of stay (LOS), total direct cost, 90-day complications, utilization of postacute services, and 30-day readmissions were studied.

RESULTS

After one-to-one matching, 2392 MTKAs and 2392 RTKAs were studied. In-room/out-of-room operating time was longer for RTKA (139 minutes) than for MTKA (107 minutes) P < .0001, as was procedure time (RTKA 78 minutes; MTKA 70 minutes), P < .0001. Median LOS was equal for MTKA and RTKA (33 hours). Total cost per case was greater for RTKA ($11,615) than MTKA ($8674), P < .0001. Home health care was utilized more frequently after RTKA (38%) than MTKA (29%), P < .0001. There was no significant difference in 90-day complication rates. Thirty-day readmissions occurred more often after MTKA (4.9%) than RTKA (1.2%), P < .0001.

CONCLUSION

RTKA was a longer and costlier procedure than MTKA for experienced surgeons, without clinically significant differences in LOS or complications. Home health care was utilized more often after RTKA, but fewer readmissions occurred after RTKA. Longer term follow-up and functional outcome studies are required to determine if the greater cost of RTKA is offset by lower revision rates and/or improved functional results.

In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design

Up to 20% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not satisfied with the result. Several designs of new implants try to rebuild natural knee kinematics. We hypothesized that an innovative implant design leads to better results concerning femoral rollback compared to an established implant design. For this pilot study, 21 patients were examined during TKA, receiving either an innovative (ATTUNE^TM Knee System (DePuy Inc.), n = 10) or an established (PFC^TM (DePuy Inc.), n = 11) knee system. All patients underwent computer navigation. Knee kinematics was assessed after implantation. Outcome measure was anterior–posterior translation between femur and tibia. We were able to demonstrate a significantly higher femoral rollback in the innovative implant group (p < 0.001). The mean rollback of the innovative system was 11.00 mm (95%-confidence interval [CI], 10.77–11.24), of the established system 8.12 mm (95%-CI, 7.84–8.42). This study revealed a significantly increased lateral as well as medial femoral rollback of knees with the innovative prosthesis design. Our intraoperative finding needs to be confirmed using fluoroscopic or radiographic three-dimensional matching under full-weight-bearing conditions after complete recovery from surgery.

The Relation of Patient Expectations, Satisfaction, and Outcome in Surgery of the Cervical Spine: A Prospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a prospective nonblinded single center observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between expectations, outcome, and satisfaction with the outcome in patients undergoing cervical spine stabilization surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In modern healthcare, patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction have become an important aspect of quality control. Therefore, outcome benchmarks for specific diseases are highly desired. Numerous studies have investigated patient-reported outcome measures and what constitutes satisfaction in degenerative lumbar spine disease. In cervical spine surgery, it is less clear what drives the postoperative symptom burden and patient satisfaction and how this depends on the primary diagnosis and other patient factors.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single center, observational study on patients undergoing cervical spine stabilization surgery for degenerative disease, trauma, infection, or tumor. Using the visual analogue scale for neck and arm pain, the neck disability index (NDI), the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (mJOA) and patient-reported satisfaction, patient status and expectations before surgery, at discharge, 6 and 12 months after surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred five patients were included. Score-based outcome correlated well with satisfaction at 6 and 12 months. Except for low NDI expectations (≥15 points) that correlated with dissatisfaction, expectations in no other score were correlated with satisfaction. Expectations did influence the outcome in some subgroups and meeting expectations resulted in higher rates of satisfaction. Pain reduction plays an important role for satisfaction, independently from the predominant symptom or pathology.

CONCLUSION

Satisfaction correlates well with outcome. Meeting expectations did influence satisfaction with the outcome. The NDI seems to be a valuable preoperative screening tool for poor satisfaction at 12 months. In degenerative pathology, pain is the predominant variable influencing satisfaction independently from the predominant symptom (including myelopathy).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Influence of Patella Position on Soft Tissue Balance and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty, a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

We hypothesized that subluxating patellar during minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS-TKA) would affect intraoperative soft tissue balance and postoperative clinical outcome.

Methods

From December 2018 to May 2020, 189 patients receiving primary MIS-TKA were enrolled. The gap-balance technique was used, with patients randomly assigned to undergo osteotomy and balance of soft tissue with patella reduced (group A; n = 93) or subluxated (group B; n = 96). The gap and varus?valgus angle were compared between groups in both extension and flexion position. The gap and varus?valgus angle were also compared before and after reducing patellar in group B. Femoral prosthesis rotation, mechanical femoral axis–to–tibial axis angle, Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analog scale (VAS), and range of motion (ROM) were compared postoperatively between two groups. Follow-up was 12 months.

Results

The flexion gap and the varus angle were significantly greater (0.4 mm and 0.7 degree) after patella reduction than before reduction, but the extension joint gap and varus angle were comparable before and after patella reduction. The femoral prosthesis tended to be internally rotated (0.65 degree) in group B. ROM and VAS was better in the group A than in group B at 1 month after surgery, but the differences were not significant at 3, 6 and 12 months. KSS was comparable between the groups after surgery.

Conclusions

During MIS-TKA, as far as possible, soft tissue balance should be achieved with the patella reduced; otherwise, the femoral prosthesis may be installed more internally and, after patella reduction, the flexion gap and varus angle would increase.

Clinical Trial Registration

Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR2000034106, https://www.chictr.org.cn/hvshowproject.aspx?id=39987.

What do patients want out of their Total Knee Arthroplasty?: An Indian perspective

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Total Knee Arthroplasty surgery is one of the most successful operations in orthopaedics. Still a sizable percentage of patients remain dissatisfied. Various studies have been conducted to analyse the red flags associated with poor outcome. In this study we tried to have insight on actual requirements of Indian patients from TKA operation.

MATERIAL & METHODS

300 patients undergoing TKA were studied by way of patient expectation feedback form. The form had various patient related capture points. It had a leading question: What are your expectations from TKA? They were asked to rank the 5 most important options in the order of importance. The patient expectation form was distributed and collected by an independent observer.

RESULTS

70% of patients ranked relief of pain as the most important expectation. 20% reported improvement in walking as the number one expectation. Nearly equal number listed improvement in walking and ease of doing day-to-day activities as the second most important expectation. This was followed by improvement in climbing the stairs and improvement in quality of life. Correction of deformity and no pain while squatting and getting up from sitting position ranked at the bottom.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the primary expectations of Indian population from their TKA are relief from pain and improvement in walking. Secondary expectations include ease of doing day-to-day activities and improvement in quality of life.

Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Scores Predict Patients Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Early Postoperative Time Period After Total Knee Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The patient-specific factors influencing postoperative improvement after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are important considerations for the surgeon and patient. The primary purpose of this study was to determine which patient demographic factors influence the postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health (GH) scores. In addition, we aimed to compare the prognostic utility of preoperative PROMIS-GH scores and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) in predicting postoperative improvement.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of patients who underwent primary, unilateral TKA analyzed prospectively collected KOOS-JR and PROMIS-GH surveys. PROMIS-GH includes physical health (PH) and mental health scores. Patient demographic and presurgical characteristics were evaluated for prognostic capability in predicting postoperative improvement in the PROMIS scores and achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to understand the prognostic thresholds of the preoperative PROMIS score and KOOS-JR for predicting MCID achievement.

RESULTS

A total of 872 patients were included. Although unadjusted analyses showed associations between patient demographic factors and PROMIS-PH scores, multivariable regression analysis for predictors of MCID achievement demonstrated that PROMIS-PH was the only significant preoperative variable. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the area under the curve of PROMIS-PH (0.70; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.74) was less than that of the KOOS-JR (0.77; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.81; P = 0.032). Sensitivity and specificity for achieving the MCID were maximized for preoperative PROMIS-PH scores of ≤ 38 (59% and 70%) and for preoperative KOOS-JR ≤ 51 (71% and 69%).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative KOOS-JR and PROMIS-PH scores predict clinically meaningful improvement after TKA. The KOOS-JR has greater prognostic utility in the early postoperative period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Prognostic Study.

Educational Attainment Affects the Early Rehabilitation of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Southwest China

Objective

To assess if the educational level of patients in Southwestern China will affect the functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

This retrospective study included a total of 334 patients (48 males, 286 females, with an average age of 68 years, range from 51 to 84 years) who had undergone primary unilateral TKA from March 2017 to April 2018. Patients were screened for enrollment and classified into four groups (illiterate group, the primary school group, high school group, and university group) according to their educational attainment. All patients were monitored for at least 2 years after TKA. The primary outcome was determined using the Hospital for Special Surgery knee (HSS) score at the time of follow‐up. The secondary outcomes were determined using the 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐12) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, the satisfaction level, and complications of the surgery.

Results

Three hundred and thirty‐four patients were divided into four groups based on their highest educational level: 83 patients in the illiteracy group, 84 in the primary school group, 91 in the high school group, and 76 in the university group. They were followed up for at least 2 years. For the primary outcome, patients with high school and university education had noteworthy better HSS scores on the surgical‐side knee than those in the primary school and illiterate groups (illiteracy group 86.71 ± 5.94 vs primary school group 85.36 ± 5.88 vs high school group 89.48 ± 3.66 vs university group 88.95 ± 3.55; P < 0.05). For secondary outcomes, the mental component summary (MCS) in the university group was significantly lower than the other three groups (P < 0.05). The results of WOMAC scores were consistent with the results of the HSS score: patients in the university group and the high school group had better results when compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in the comparison of additional indicators and complications among the four groups, but more patients (12 peoples, 15.8%) in the university group were dissatisfied with knee function after TKA.

Conclusion

In Southwest China, patients with high school education or above can achieve better joint function after TKA but do not get better postoperative satisfaction, which may be related to the patients' higher surgical expectations for social and mental needs.

Satisfaction with playing pre-injury sports 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring autograft

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to investigate patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sport and identify factors associated with satisfaction.

METHODS

A total of 97 patients underwent unilateral ACL reconstruction using a hamstring autograft and returned to pre-injury sports 1 year after surgery. Patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sport was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) and an ordinal four-grade scale. Problems related to the operated knee were also assessed. Knee muscle strength, single leg hop distance, knee laxity, subjective knee pain, and fear of movement/reinjury using Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) were measured. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sport 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The average VAS score for patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sports 1 year after surgery was 77.8 ± 20.2. Of the 97 patients, 87 patients (89.7%) answered "satisfied" or "mostly satisfied", whereas 51 patients (52.6%) had one or more problems. Multivariate linear regression analysis identified that the TSK-11 score was associated with patient satisfaction with playing a pre-injury sport 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Most of the patients who returned to pre-injury sports were satisfied with their outcomes. In contrast, approximately half of the patients had one or more problems after returning to play pre-injury sports. In particular, fear of movement/reinjury was significantly associated with patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sport 1 year after surgery.

Evaluation of Patient Expectations before Carpal Tunnel Release

Background:

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is common, yet patient treatment expectations remain unclear. The primary purpose was to describe patient expectations before CTR. Secondarily, we aimed to identify factors influencing expectations.

Methods:

Included patients underwent unilateral or bilateral CTR between 2015 and 2017 at a single academic center. Expectations regarding the level of relief/improvement were queried. Area deprivation index (ADI) was used to measure social deprivation. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with expecting great relief/improvement.

Results:

Of 307 included patients, mean age was 54 ± 16 years and 63% were women. Patients most commonly expected great (58%) or some (23%) relief/improvement. Few patients expected little (3%) or no (4%) relief/improvement, and 13% had no expectations. In the multivariable analysis, male sex, lower social deprivation, and lower BMI were associated with expecting great relief/improvement. Age, surgical technique (open versus endoscopic), use of the operating room versus procedure room, and preoperative factors (constant numbness, weakness/atrophy, duration of symptoms, and QuickDASH) were not associated with expectations.

Conclusions:

Most patients expect some to great improvement after CTR. This was independent of several factors with a known association with worse outcomes (advanced age, atrophy/weakness, and constant numbness). Male sex was associated with the expectation of great improvement, in which superior outcomes relative to females have not been borne out in the literature. These findings highlight patient counseling opportunities. The observed association between social deprivation and expectations warrants further investigation, as the socioeconomically disadvantaged experience worse healthcare outcomes in general.

Short-Term Clinical and Return-to-Work Outcomes After Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Onlay Biceps Tenodesis With a Single Suture Anchor

Purpose

To describe short-term outcomes of arthroscopic suprapectoral onlay biceps tenodesis using a single all-suture anchor with respect to validated outcome measures, return to work, objective strength and motion data, and biceps-specific testing.

Methods

This study describes a consecutive series of patients undergoing arthroscopic suprapectoral onlay biceps tenodesis performed by a single surgeon from January to December 2017. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire, visual analog scale, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, and 12-Item Short Form survey, and return-to-work survey. Postoperative strength, range of motion, and biceps-specific testing was also performed.

Results

This study included 50 patients (26 men and 24 women), with an average age (± standard deviation) of 50.1 ± 10.9 years and average final follow-up of 21.3 ± 8.5 months. Among employed patients, 32 (71.1%) returned to work at an average of 4.6 ± 2.3 months. Light-duty workers returned to work at a significantly greater rate (85.7% vs 33.3%, P = .016) and in less time (2.6 ± 2.0 months vs 6.8 ± 4.2 months) than heavy-duty workers. No differences were found between operative and nonoperative sides in the biceps apex distance (P = .636) or range of motion in elbow flexion and extension (P > .9 for both), supination (P = .192), or pronation (P = .343) postoperatively. Strength in elbow flexion (P = .002), as well as shoulder forward elevation (P < .001) and external rotation (P < .001), increased postoperatively. Significant patient-reported improvements were noted in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale pain score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, Constant-Murley score, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey and 12-Item Short Form physical component scores (P ≤ .001 for all). A postoperative Popeye deformity developed in 5 patients (10%).

Conclusions

Arthroscopic suprapectoral onlay biceps tenodesis with a single all-suture anchor can provide overall excellent clinical outcomes regarding strength, motion, and validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Return to occupational activities may be less predictable and more prolonged for heavy laborers. A small number of patients may experience cosmetic deformity postoperatively.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Early Identification of Patient Satisfaction Two Years After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There are numerous reports of poor satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet there is little known about when to use evidence-based models of care to improve patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to characterize longitudinal changes in patient-reported satisfaction after TKA and to identify factors for early identification of poor satisfaction.

METHODS

For a cohort of primary TKA surgeries (n = 86), patient-reported outcomes were captured one week before TKA and 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years after TKA. "Satisfied" versus "not fully satisfied" patients were defined using a binary response (≥90 vs <90) from a 100-point scale. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests identified changes in satisfaction between follow-up times, and longitudinal analyses examined demographic and questionnaire factors associated with satisfaction.

RESULTS

Improvements in satisfaction occurred within the first 6 months after TKA (P ≤ 0.01). Preoperative patient-reported outcome measures alone were not predictive of satisfaction. Key factors that improved longitudinal satisfaction included higher Oxford Knee Scores (odds ratio (OR) = 2.1, P < .001), general health (EQ-VAS, OR = 1.3, P = .03), and less visual analog scale pain (VAS; OR = 1.7, P < .001). Differences in these factors between satisfied and not fully satisfied patients were identified as early as 6 weeks after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Visibly different satisfaction profiles were captured among satisfied and not fully satisfied patient responses, with differences in patient-perceived joint function, general health, and pain severity occurring as early as 6 weeks after surgery. This study provides metrics to support early identification of patients at risk of poor TKA satisfaction, enabling clinicians to apply timely targeted treatment and support interventions, with the aim of improving patient outcomes.

Preoperative Expectations of Patients Undergoing Knee Surgery

There is limited validated data regarding the relationship between preoperative expectations and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing knee surgery. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess the preoperative expectations of patients undergoing knee surgery and (2) determine the relationship between preoperative patient demographics, PROs, and preoperative patient expectations. We hypothesized that younger patients with worse function and worse general health status would have greater expectations of knee surgery. We analyzed data from 399 patients undergoing knee surgery at an urban academic medical center. We utilized the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System to measure preoperative expectations. Multiple legacy PRO measures were recorded, as well as the new Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Testing. Nonparametric statistical analyses were performed to determine significance. Overall, patients undergoing knee surgery had high expectations, with a mean of 88.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.7-89.3) and median of 91.7 (95% CI, 89.2-94.3). Greater preoperative expectations of knee surgery were associated with higher income, surgically naïve knee, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, better PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores, greater Marx knee activity scores, and lower total body pain (p < 0.05). Preoperative expectations of patients undergoing knee surgery are associated with a history of prior knee surgery, income, general and mental health, activity, and pain. Expectations were also found to be associated with PRO measures of function and psychological well-being. These findings may have implications for patient education and shared decision-making preoperatively. The level of evidence for the study is IV.

Gamifying health literacy: how can digital technology optimize patient outcomes in surgery?

The digital age is entrenched in our society, with constant innovation driving change in the way clinicians and patients manage their health concerns. Health literacy is emerging as an important modifiable factor that can affect clinical and patient outcomes, yet traditional forms of patient education have shown mixed results. Digital media and technologies, the concept of gamification as a means to improve patient health literacy, and its potential for misuse will be explored in this review, in the context of a digital, gamified tool that could support patients along their surgical journey.

Predictors of met expectations two years after knee surgery

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to determine which patient factors predict two-year postoperative met expectations in a cohort of patients undergoing knee surgery. Additionally, this study aims to measure the association between met expectations and postoperative outcomes.

Methods

319 patients undergoing knee surgery at one institution were studied. Patients completed patient-reported outcome questionnaires prior to surgery and again two years postoperatively. Preoperative Expectations and postoperative Met Expectations were measured using the Musculoskeletal Outcomes and Data Evaluation Management System (MODEMS) Expectations domain.

Results

The mean Met Expectations score was significantly lower than the preoperative Expectations Score. Worse two-year Met Expectations were associated with older age, higher BMI, greater comorbidities, more previous surgeries, black race, unemployment, lower income, government insurance, Worker's Compensation, smoking, and no injury prior to surgery. Greater Met Expectations were correlated with better scores on all two-year outcome measures as well as greater improvement on most outcome measures. Race, insurance status, function, mental health, and knee pain were found to be independent predictors of Met Expectations.

Conclusion

This study identified multiple patient factors and outcome measures that were associated with Met Expectations two years after knee surgery.

Risk Factors for Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Pediatric Population: A Prediction Algorithm

Background:

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients is becoming increasingly common. There is growing yet limited literature on the risk factors for revision in this demographic.

Purpose:

To (1) determine the rate of pediatric revision ACLR in a nationally representative sample, (2) ascertain the associated patient- and injury-specific risk factors for revision ACLR, and (3) examine the differences in the rate and risks of revision ACLR between pediatric and adult patients.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The PearlDiver patient record database was used to identify adult patients (age ≥20 years) and pediatric patients (age <20 years) who underwent primary ACLR between 2010 and 2015. At 5 years postoperatively, the risk of revision ACLR was compared between the adult and pediatric groups. ACLR to the contralateral side was also compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the significant risk factors for revision ACLR and the overall reoperation rates in pediatric and adult patients; from these risk factors, an algorithm was developed to predict the risk of revision ACLR in pediatric patients.

Results:

Included were 2055 pediatric patients, 1778 adult patients aged 20 to 29 years, and 1646 adult patients aged 30 to 39 years who underwent ACLR. At 5 years postoperatively, pediatric patients faced a higher risk of revision surgery when compared with adults (18.0 % vs 9.2% [adults 20-29 years] and 7.1% [adults 30-39 years]; P < .0001), with significantly decreased survivorship of the index ACLR (P < .0001; log-rank test). Pediatric patients were also at higher risk of undergoing contralateral ACLR as compared with adults (5.8% vs 1.6% [adults 20-29 years] and 1.9% [adults 30-39 years]; P < .0001). Among the pediatric cohort, boys (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96; P = .0204) and patients >14 years old (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86; P = .0035) had a decreased risk of overall reoperation; patients undergoing concurrent meniscal repair (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.43-2.38; P < .0001) or meniscectomy (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.72-2.82; P < .0001) had an increased risk of revision surgery. According to the risk algorithm, the highest probability for revision ACLR was in girls <15 years old with concomitant meniscal and medial collateral ligament injury (36% risk of revision).

Conclusion:

As compared with adults, pediatric patients had an increased likelihood of revision ACLR, contralateral ACLR, and meniscal reoperation within 5 years of an index ACLR. Families of pediatric patients—especially female patients, younger patients, and those with concomitant medial collateral ligament and meniscal injuries—should be counseled on such risks.

Machine Learning Can Predict Level of Improvement in Shoulder Arthroplasty

The ability to accurately predict postoperative outcomes is of considerable interest in the field of orthopaedic surgery. Machine learning has been used as a form of predictive modeling in multiple health-care settings. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether machine learning algorithms using preoperative data can predict improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) at a minimum of 2 years after shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study that included 472 patients (472 shoulders) diagnosed with primary glenohumeral OA (mean age, 68 years; 56% male) treated with shoulder arthroplasty (431 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and 41 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were used to classify patients on the basis of glenoid and rotator cuff morphology. Preoperative and final postoperative ASES scores were used to assess the level of improvement. Patients were separated into 3 improvement ranges of approximately equal size. Machine learning methods that related patterns of these variables to outcome ranges were employed. Three modeling approaches were compared: a model with the use of all baseline variables (Model 1), a model omitting morphological variables (Model 2), and a model omitting ASES variables (Model 3).

RESULTS

Improvement ranges of ≤28 points (class A), 29 to 55 points (class B), and >55 points (class C) were established. Using all follow-up time intervals, Model 1 gave the most accurate predictions, with probability values of 0.94, 0.95, and 0.94 for classes A, B, and C, respectively. This was followed by Model 2 (0.93, 0.80, and 0.73) and Model 3 (0.77, 0.72, and 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning can accurately predict the level of improvement after shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral OA. This may allow physicians to improve patient satisfaction by better managing expectations. These predictions were most accurate when latent variables were combined with morphological variables, suggesting that both patients' perceptions and structural pathology are critical to optimizing outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient-Reported Expectations, Outcome and Satisfaction in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Stabilization Surgery: A Prospective Study

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become an important aspect of quality control in modern healthcare. In this prospective observational study on 199 patients undergoing thoracolumbar stabilization surgery, we quantified preoperative expectations and PROMs at six and twelve months after surgery, and we investigated what constitutes patient satisfaction with the outcome. We used the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Preoperative expectations were high (expected ODI: 9 ± 13%; leg pain: 1.0 ± 1.4; back pain: 1.3 ± 1.5). Pain and disability improved substantially, but expectations were mostly unrealistic (ODI expectation fulfilled after six months: 28% of patients; back pain: 48%). However, satisfaction was high (70% at six months after surgery). Satisfied patients had significantly better pain and disability outcomes and higher rates of expectation fulfillment than non-satisfied patients. Patients undergoing revision stabilization had worse outcomes than all other diagnosis groups. Prior stabilization surgery was identified as an independent risk factor for dissatisfaction. There were no preoperative pain or disability levels that predicted dissatisfaction. The data presented in this study can provide benchmarks for diagnosis-specific PROM targets in thoracolumbar stabilization surgery. Future studies should investigate whether satisfaction can be influenced, e.g., by discussing realistic outcome targets with patients ahead of surgery.

Predictors of Patient Satisfaction Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results from a Traditional Statistical Model and a Machine Learning Algorithm

BACKGROUND

It is well-documented in the orthopedic literature that 1 in 5 patients are dissatisfied following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, multiple statistical models have failed to explain the causes of dissatisfaction. Furthermore, payers are interested in using patient-reported satisfaction scores to adjust surgeon reimbursement rates without a full understanding of the influencing parameters. The purpose of this study was to more comprehensively identify predictors of satisfaction and compare results using both a statistical model and a machine learning (ML) algorithm.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive TKAs performed by 2 surgeons was conducted. Identical perioperative protocols were utilized by both surgeons. Patients were grouped as satisfied or unsatisfied based on self-reported satisfaction scores. Fifteen variables were correlated with satisfaction using binary logistic regression and stochastic gradient boosted ML models.

RESULTS

In total, 1325 consecutive TKAs were performed. After exclusions, 897 TKAs were available with minimum 1-year follow-up. Overall, 85.3% of patients were satisfied. Older age generation and performing surgeon were predictors of satisfaction in both models. The ML model also retained cruciate-retaining/condylar-stabilizing implant; lack of inflammatory conditions, preoperative narcotic use, depression, and lumbar spine pain; female gender; and a preserved posterior cruciate ligament as predictors of satisfaction which allowed for a significantly higher area under the receiver operator characteristic curve compared to the binary logistic regression model (0.81 vs 0.60).

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that patient satisfaction may be multifactorial with some factors beyond the scope of a surgeon's control. Further study is warranted to investigate predictors of patient satisfaction particularly with awareness of differences in results between traditional statistical models and ML algorithms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

PROMIS physical function two weeks following orthopaedic surgery

Many patients opt for elective orthopaedic procedures to regain physical function. However, little data exist about patient-reported early postoperative function.

PURPOSE

To characterize physical function two weeks postoperative from upper and lower extremity orthopaedic surgery and to determine pre-operative factors that are associated with physical function two weeks following surgery.

METHODS

Patients 17 years and older undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery at one institution were enrolled prospectively and completed questionnaires prior to surgery and again two weeks postoperatively. The questionnaires included: six of the PROMIS computer adaptive questionnaires: Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference, Fatigue, Social Satisfaction, Anxiety, and Depression; a joint-specific function questionnaire, a joint numeric pain scale, and a body numeric pain scale. Physical activity levels were measured using Tegner, IPAQ, and Marx. Responses were analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient, ANOVA, and multivariate linear stepwise regression with two-week PF as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

435 patients (47% female) with mean age 41.1 ± 15.7 were included in our final analysis. Mean baseline PF score was 42.1 and mean two-week PF score was 35.5 (p < .0001). Patients undergoing upper extremity surgery had higher PF at two weeks than those undergoing lower extremity surgery (39.1 vs 32.2, p < .0001). Younger age, Hispanic ethnicity, preoperative narcotic use, injury prior to surgery, and procedure all had a significant relationship with lower 2-week postoperative PF score (p < 0.05). Numerous baseline and 2-week measures were correlated with postoperative PF score, with 2-week Social Satisfaction demonstrating the strongest correlation (r_s = 0.604, p < .0001). Multivariable regression confirmed that the better preoperative PF score and upper extremity surgery were independent preoperative predictors of better 2-week PF scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients have a significant decline in physical function following orthopaedic surgery, with those undergoing lower extremity surgery having a significantly greater decline. Many factors are associated with activity levels, including mental health, pain, and satisfaction. This information can be used to help manage patients' short-term expectations.

Preoperative expectations and early postoperative met expectations of extremity orthopaedic surgery

BACKGROUND

Preoperative patient expectations and met expectations are likely associated with the outcome of treatment. However, there is a lack of data regarding the preoperative expectations and early postoperative met expectations of patients undergoing extremity orthopaedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to identify the predictors of early postoperative met expectations in a cohort of patients undergoing extremity orthopaedic surgery and to assess the relationship between patient expectations and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. We hypothesized that patients with higher preoperative expectation scores and higher postoperative met expectation scores would have better early postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Four hundred thirty-five patients age seventeen and older who underwent extremity orthopaedic surgery at one institution were prospectively enrolled in this study. Each patient completed a preoperative questionnaire that included an assessment of demographics, pain, function, general health, treatment expectations, activity level, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing. Expectations were evaluated using the Expectations Domain of the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS) questionnaire. Patients completed a follow-up questionnaire two weeks after surgery that also assessed MODEMS met expectations and satisfaction (Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8)).

RESULTS

The mean preoperative expectation score was 86.95 ± 16.59, and the mean postoperative met expectation score was 55.02 ± 27.63 (0-100 scale with 100 representing the highest level of expectations). Greater met expectations were significantly associated with white race (p = 0.025), college degree (p = 0.011), and higher income (p = 0.002). Greater met expectations were also significantly associated with greater postoperative physical function, social satisfaction, activity level, and subjective improvement, as well as lower pain interference, joint pain, body pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.01 for each). Multivariable analysis results found that less postoperative joint pain and greater postoperative social satisfaction, improvement, and physical function were all significant independent predictors of greater met expectations at two weeks postoperative (p < 0.01 for each).

CONCLUSION

Greater preoperative expectations are associated with better activity and less pain two weeks after surgery. Met expectations of extremity orthopaedic surgery were associated with postoperative physical function, social satisfaction, activity, pain, anxiety, depression, and subjective improvement. These results may have implications for preoperative counseling and risk factor modification.

Preoperative low scores of Life Satisfaction Rating predicts poor outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective observational study

Background

Despite the continued improvement in the surgical techniques during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), literatures indicate that up to 10 to 20% patients are not satisfied with their outcomes. Psychological factors in this dissatisfaction are yet to be clearly identified. The aim of this study is to develop a method to assess whether the patient’s current mental state is suitable enough to accept a TKA surgery.

Methods

Preoperative demographic and clinical data of 532 patients who underwent TKA were prospectively obtained from January 2012 until December 2016. We recorded the scores evaluated by SF-36 questionnaire and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Preoperative Life Satisfaction Rating (LSR) is emphatically evaluated.

Results

Poor preoperative score of LSR was a significant predictor of dissatisfaction after TKA. Patients with low LSR reported significant pain and stiffness, although there was no remarkable effect on functionality of the replaced joint. The results also showed that age and BMI were not strong predictors of satisfaction in TKA.

Conclusion

Our outcomes can help clinicians evaluate whether a patient’s current mental status is favorable for TKA. If patients have extreme low scores of LSR (less than 10), a psychological intervention should be recommended for better satisfaction following a TKA surgery. This would also allow surgeons to individually assess the risks and benefits of surgery.

Do dissatisfied patients have unrealistic expectations? A systematic review and best-evidence synthesis in knee and hip arthroplasty patients

End-stage osteoarthritis is commonly treated with joint replacement. Despite high clinical success rates, up to 28% of patients are dissatisfied with the outcome.

This best-evidence synthesis aimed to review studies with different forms of study design and methodology that examined the relationship between (fulfilment of) outcome expectations of hip and knee patients and satisfaction with outcome.

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Cochrane, and Google Scholar to identify studies conducted up to November 2017. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

In this best-evidence synthesis systematic review, the following main results could be seen. In only half of all studies were preoperative expectations associated with level of satisfaction, while in almost all studies (93%), fulfilment of expectations was related to satisfaction. The effect of met expectations did not differ between hip and knee patients or study design.

Fulfilment of expectations seems to be consistently associated with patient satisfaction with outcome. Emphasis in future research must be placed on the operationalization and measurement of expectations and satisfaction to determine the (strength of the) influence of these different forms of assessment on the (existence of the) relationship.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:226-240. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190015

What Do Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Expect from a Urologist in Secondary Care?

PURPOSE

To identify the expectations of men with LUTS referred to a urologist and to study the association between those expectations and satisfaction with the care provided.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, adult men with LUTS completed a questionnaire before their first outpatient appointment, and again at 6 and 12 weeks. The questionnaires included IPSS and OABq-SF, and self-constructed questions on patient expectations, outcome of expectations and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Data from 182 participants showed positive expectations about the urologist performing examinations, providing explanations and finding the underlying cause, but mostly neutral expectations for treatment plans and outcomes. Positive treatment expectations were associated with positive expectations about outcomes after physiotherapy, drug treatment and surgery. Higher symptom scores and age were associated with higher expectations about drug treatment. Expectations were subjectively and objectively fulfilled for 66.4% and 27.3%, respectively. Symptom improvement (decrease in IPSS scores) was significantly more in men with objectively fulfilled expectations than in men with no unfulfilled expectations. No significant difference was present between men with subjectively fulfilled expectations and men with unfulfilled expectations. However, satisfaction was significantly higher for patients with subjectively fulfilled expectations at 6 and 12 weeks compared with those who had unfulfilled expectations.

CONCLUSION

Most men referred to a urologist with LUTS do express clear expectations about treatment in secondary care. Patients with higher expectations for treatment outcomes are more likely to expect to receive that treatment. Satisfaction with the care of a urologist is also higher when patients self-report that they receive the treatment they expected.

A research agenda to improve patients' experience of knee replacement surgery: a patient-oriented modified Delphi study of patients of South Asian origin in British Columbia

BACKGROUND

Up to 1 in 5 patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) express dissatisfaction with their surgery. Our goal was to understand the experiences of patients of South Asian origin who undergo TKA and to identify a research agenda for this patient population.

METHODS

We undertook a modified Delphi study in British Columbia to generate and prioritize potential research topics. An initial list of topics was generated using 3 focus groups with patients of South Asian origin who underwent TKA and their caregivers. Focus group sessions were audiotaped and transcribed, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The resulting Delphi question-naire was administered over 2 rounds to patients, caregivers and health professionals. The second-round questionnaire included only topics that were strongly supported in the first round. A patient-oriented approach was adopted, with 3 patient partners as full research team members, who contributed to scoping, design, data collection, analysis and interpretation.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients who had undergone TKA and 6 caregivers attended the focus groups. Our analyses resulted in 6 broad themes and 25 research topics, all of which were presented in the first round of the Delphi survey. The survey was completed by 27 patients and 5 caregivers (54% combined response rate) and by 25 clinicians (76% response rate). Top priorities both for patients and caregivers and for clinicians were promoting exercise following surgery and self-management after hospital discharge. One of the highest ranked topics for patients and caregivers was improving knee implants; this was supported by only 60% of clinicians.

INTERPRETATION

The patients and caregivers in our study prioritized research on promotion of exercise and self-management following surgery and improvement in knee implants. Future patient-oriented research efforts in Canada should emphasize these topics for this patient population.

Differences in Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group Survey Scores by Recency of the Last Visit: Implications for Comparability of Periodic and Continuous Sampling

BACKGROUND

Patient experience data can be collected by sampling patients periodically (eg, patients with any visits over a 1-year period) or sampling visits continuously (eg, sampling any visit in a monthly interval). Continuous sampling likely yields a sample with more frequent and more recent visits, possibly affecting the comparability of data collected under the 2 approaches.

OBJECTIVE

To explore differences in Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group survey (CG-CAHPS) scores using periodic and continuous sampling.

RESEARCH DESIGN

We use observational data to estimate case-mix-adjusted differences in patient experience scores under 12-month periodic sampling and simulated continuous sampling.

SUBJECTS

A total of 29,254 adult patients responding to the CG-CAHPS survey regarding visits in the past 12 months to any of 480 physicians, 2007-2009.

MEASURES

Overall doctor rating and 4 CG-CAHPS composite measures of patient experience: doctor communication, access to care, care coordination, and office staff.

RESULTS

Compared with 12-month periodic sampling, simulated continuous sampling yielded patients with more recent visits (by definition), more frequent visits (92% of patients with 2+ visits, compared with 76%), and more positive case-mix-adjusted CAHPS scores (2-3 percentage points higher).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with more frequent visits reported markedly higher CG-CAHPS scores, but this causes only small to moderate changes in adjusted physician-level scores between 12-month periodic and continuous sampling schemes. Caution should be exercised in trending or comparing scores collected through different schemes.

Fulfilment of preoperative expectations and postoperative patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. A prospective analysis of 200 patients

BACKGROUND

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the association between preoperative patient expectations, their postoperative fulfilment, and satisfaction is not well understood. The aim of this study was to quantify these relationships in a cohort of TKA patients with differing socio-economic backgrounds from across Scotland.

METHODS

Expectations of 200 patients undergoing TKA were assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Score. Postoperatively, expectation fulfilment was assessed at six weeks and one year. Satisfaction was measured using a five-point Likert scale. Preoperative and postoperative scores were compared across satisfaction groups. Relationships between individual and overall expectation fulfilment, satisfaction, and demographics were analysed.

RESULTS

At six weeks, 30% of expectations were fulfilled, increasing to 48% at one year. Corresponding satisfaction rates were 84% and 89%. Higher fulfilment scores were associated with greater satisfaction. Fulfilment of pain and mobility expectations were most predictive of satisfaction. Expectations of kneeling, squatting, paid work and sexual function went unfulfilled. Preoperative expectations were not related to postoperative satisfaction. Males had higher postoperative fulfilment scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a clear association between fulfilment of preoperative expectations and patient satisfaction following TKA. However, less than 50% of patient expectations were completely fulfilled. While higher fulfilment scores were predictive of greater satisfaction, low overall fulfilment score did not preclude satisfaction. The high correlation of pain and function expectation fulfilment with satisfaction emphasises the need to relate these as appropriate preoperative expectations, while awareness of unfulfilled expectations may allow engagement with and resolution of ongoing concerns and disappointments.

Postoperative satisfaction following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: patient expectation versus actuality

OBJECTIVE

Due to the reported benefits associated with minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS), patients seeking out minimally invasive surgery may have higher expectations regarding their outcomes. In this study the authors aimed to assess the effects of preoperative expectations and postoperative outcome actuality, and the difference between the two, on postoperative satisfaction following MIS for lumbar fusion procedures.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for either a 1- or 2-level lumbar fusion MIS were administered confidential surveys preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The surveys administered preoperatively consisted of 2 parts: preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back pain, and VAS leg pain, and expected postoperative PROs. The surveys administered 6 months postoperatively consisted of 2 parts: postoperative PROs and satisfaction. Preoperative symptoms, expected postoperative symptoms, and actual postoperative symptoms were compared using paired t-tests. Pearson correlation was used to compare the association between 1) postoperative change in PROs and satisfaction, 2) expectation and satisfaction, 3) expectation-actuality discrepancy and satisfaction, and 4) actuality and satisfaction.

RESULTS

In total, 101 patients completed all surveys. Patients expected to improve in all PROs from baseline, except for ODI personal care, in which they expected to get worse after surgery. In actuality, patients improved in all PROs from baseline, except for ODI personal care, in which they did not demonstrate improvement or worsening. Patients did not surpass any expectations regarding PRO improvement. The association between patient satisfaction and postoperative change was strong for the VAS back pain score, while ODI and VAS leg pain scores showed moderate correlations. Preoperative expectation and postoperative satisfaction demonstrated weak to moderate correlations for all outcome measures. All 3 PROs demonstrated moderate correlation between patient satisfaction and the expectation-actuality discrepancy. All 3 PROs demonstrated strong correlations between satisfaction and actual postoperative outcomes, with ODI having the strongest correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study, the authors determined that the actual postoperative results following surgery were strongly correlated with patient satisfaction, while the patients' expectation, the expectation-actuality discrepancy, and the postoperative improvement did not demonstrate strong correlations for all patient-reported outcome measures utilized in this study. The investigation results suggest that the most important indicator of how satisfied patients feel following surgery may be the actual outcome itself, rather than the preoperative expectation or the degree to which the expected result was met.

Modifying Patient Expectations Can Enhance Total Hip Arthroplasty Postoperative Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of patient expectations within the perioperative setting will enable clinicians to better tailor care to the needs of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) recipient. Such an approach will promote patient-centered decision-making and optimize recovery times while enhancing mandated hospital quality metrics. In the present study, we preoperatively and postoperatively surveyed THA candidates to elucidate the relationship between patient expectations and length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

This is a multi-institutional prospective study among THA candidates. Patients were surveyed regarding discharge planning 1 week preoperatively and postoperatively to capture perioperative patient expectations and correlate with inpatient LOS.

RESULTS

In total, 93 THAs performed by 6 high-volume orthopedic surgeons at 2 medical centers. Our results demonstrated that patients of male gender and commercial insurance had significantly (P < .05) shorter LOS. Shorter LOS patients demonstrated significantly higher levels of LOS acceptance ("very comfortable" rate in same-day discharge: 75.0% and next-day discharge: 63.8%; 2 days: 40.7%; 3+ days: 42.9%; P < .05) and a higher likelihood to participate in SDD programs. Postoperatively, patients with a shorter LOS had more acceptance to their LOS, albeit not statistically significant (P = .20).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that guiding patient expectations within the perioperative setting is an essential component for successful and timely discharge after THA. Having clear and transparent discussion with the surgical team regarding the perioperative course can improve a THA candidate's understanding and buy-in with the postoperative plan, regardless of LOS. Finally, inpatient LOS does not appear to affect patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective observational study.

Effects of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients Older Than 65 Years

OBJECTIVES

To explore the safety and efficacy of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for elderly total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.

METHODS

A prospective controlled study was conducted for patients older than 65 years, who would undergo unilateral TKA with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were divided into an ERAS group (n = 106) and a traditional group (n = 141) based on the patients' willingness to participate in the ERAS program. Baseline parameters of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and comorbidity were recorded. Complication, mortality, knee function assessment using knee society score and knee range of motion, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline parameters. Although no significant differences were found in postoperative nausea and vomiting, urinary tract infection, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, wound delayed healing, superficial infection, and deep infection, there were significantly fewer total complications in the ERAS group (26/106 vs 52/141; P = 0.039). No significant difference was found in short-term mortality (1/106 vs 3/141; P = 0.836) between the two groups. There were no significant differences in preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), knee society score (KSS), and range of motion (ROM) between the two groups. Lower VAS scores were found in the ERAS group at time of postoperative day (POD) 1 (P = 0.012) and POD 5 (P = 0.020); no significant differences were observed at time of postoperative month (POM) 1 and final follow-up. Higher KSS scores were found in the ERAS group at time of POD 1 (P = 0.013), and POD 5 (P = 0.011), no significant differences were observed at time of POM 1 and final follow-up. Increased ROM degree was found in the ERAS group at time of POD 1 (P = 0.021); no significant differences were observed at time of POD 5, POM 1 and final follow-up. Decreased intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), total blood loss (P < 0.001), transfusion rate (P = 0.004), and length of stay (P < 0.001) were found in the ERAS group; no significant differences were found in operative time and hospitalization costs between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The ERAS program is safer and more efficacious in elderly TKA patients compared to the traditional pathway. It could effectively relieve perioperative pain and improve joint function, and reduce blood transfusion, length of stay, and total complications without increasing short-term mortality.

A pragmatic approach to prevent post-traumatic osteoarthritis after sport or exercise-related joint injury

Lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries are common in sport and exercise, and associated with increased risk of obesity and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Unlike other forms of osteoarthritis, PTOA is common at a younger age and associated with more rapid progression, which may impact career choices, long-term general health and reduce quality of life. Individuals who suffer an activity-related joint injury and present with abnormal joint morphology, elevated adiposity, weak musculature, or become physically inactive are at increased risk of PTOA. Insufficient exercise therapy or incomplete rehabilitation, premature return-to-sport and re-injury, unrealistic expectations, or poor nutrition may further elevate this risk. Delay in surgical interventions in lieu of exercise therapy to optimize muscle strength and neuromuscular control while addressing fear of movement to guarantee resumption of physical activity, completeness of rehabilitation before return-to-sport, education that promotes realistic expectations and self-management, and nutritional counseling are the best approaches for delaying or preventing PTOA.

Developing a surgeon-patient communication checklist for total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established surgical procedure with high rates of clinical success, yet up to 20% of patients are dissatisfied with their outcomes. Surgeon-patient communication is an important contributor to patient satisfaction, particularly in the area of setting or resetting postoperative expectations that are reasonable and achievable for individual patients.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the present research was to develop a communication checklist for surgeons to use with their patients, to enhance communication in order better to manage postoperative expectations and increase patient satisfaction with TKA.

METHODS

Content analysis was used to identify a preliminary list of checklist items from audio-recorded interviews of eight patients who were between 6 weeks and 6 months of their recovery from TKA. Patients identified eight issues for which more information was desired. The proportion of mentions for each topic was calculated, and chi-square tests assessed the distribution and pattern of the categories mentioned across groups of patients.

RESULTS

Certain topics were used significantly more often than others. Age and employment status, but not gender, affected which topics were mentioned more often. The final categories for the checklist included pain management, physiotherapy, medication and general outcome information.

CONCLUSION

An in-depth analysis of patient experiences of recovering from TKA was the foundation of this research. The result was a checklist that creates a potential new avenue for increasing patient satisfaction by improving surgeon-patient communication. The research described here could extend to any other type of intervention in which understanding patient expectations and increasing patient satisfaction is the goal.

Preoperative Quadriceps Muscle Strength and Functional Ability Predict Performance-Based Outcomes 6 Months After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

One-third of individuals report limitations in activities of daily living even 6 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Moderate-quality evidence exists for several sociodemographic and clinical predictors of patient-reported outcome measures of perceived functionality. Objectively measured performance-based measures (PBMs) provide a less subjective approach to informing patient treatment after TKA; however, information about predictors of functionally relevant PBMs is scarce.

PURPOSE

This systematic review synthesized the available research on preoperative predictors of PBMs after primary TKA for osteoarthritis.

DATA SOURCES

In June 2016 and January 2017, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Cohort studies exploring preoperative predictors of stair climbing, walking speed, and gait speed measured ≥6 months after primary TKA were included. Screening of abstracts and selection of full texts were undertaken by 2 independent reviewers.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information on study design, patient characteristics, analysis, and results was extracted using pilot-tested forms. Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias using modified Quality in Prognostic Studies criteria.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of the eligible 12 studies involving 6 prospective cohorts, 10 studies reported information on baseline predictors. Meta-analysis of predictors was not possible because of missing information on effect size or standard errors. Narrative synthesis of evidence of predictors was therefore performed.

LIMITATIONS

The quality of evidence was low because of the risk of bias and heterogeneity of included studies as well as nonreporting of measures of effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-quality evidence exists for an association of preoperative functional ability and quadriceps muscle strength with functionality at 6 months after TKA. Improved reporting of predictor analyses is needed to enable evidence generation for clinical management.

Revisiting patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a longitudinal observational study

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most common joint replacement surgery in Canada. Earlier Canadian work reported 1 in 5 TKA patients expressing dissatisfaction following surgery. A better understanding of satisfaction could guide program improvement. We investigated patient satisfaction post-TKA in British Columbia (BC).

Methods

A cohort of 515 adult TKA patients was recruited from across BC. Survey data were collected preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months, supplemented by administrative health data. The primary outcome measure was patient satisfaction with outcomes. Potential satisfaction drivers included demographics, patient-reported health, quality of life, social support, comorbidities, and insurance status. Multivariable growth modeling was used to predict satisfaction at 6 months and change in satisfaction (6 to 12 months).

Results

We found dissatisfaction rates (“very dissatisfied”, “dissatisfied” or “neutral”) of 15% (6 months) and 16% (12 months). Across all health measures, improvements were seen post-surgery. The multivariable model suggests satisfaction at 6 months is predicted by: pre-operative pain, mental health and physical health (odds ratios (ORs) 2.65, 3.25 and 3.16), and change in pain level, baseline to 6 months (OR 2.31). Also, improvements in pain, mental health and physical health from 6 to 12 months predicted improvements in satisfaction (ORs 1.24, 1.30 and 1.55).

Conclusions

TKA is an effective intervention for many patients and most report high levels of satisfaction. However, if the TKA does not deliver improvements in pain and physical health, we see a less satisfied patient. In addition, dissatisfied TKA patients typically see limited improvements in mental health.

How do the expectations of patients compare with their surgeons regarding outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy?

Our objective was to determine the frequency and strength of agreement between patients and their surgeons on preoperative expectations of the outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) surgery. We also sought to determine whether patient preoperative function and pain levels were associated with patients’ and surgeons’ expectations and to identify the motivating factors for patients to undergo PAO. Two surgeons and their combined 68 patients preoperatively completed 4-point Likert-scales rating their expectations of improvement in six domains representing different hip symptoms after surgery. Domains included pain, stiffness, locking, stability, walking ability and athletic ability. Concordance between patient and surgeon expectation was evaluated by the percent of exact and partial agreement. Correlation analyses were performed to investigate associations between expectations of improvement and patient factors. Exact agreement between patients and surgeons ranged from 18.2% (stiffness) to 55.9% (pain) and partial agreement between patients and surgeons ranged from 48.5% (stiffness) to 100% (pain). Patients with higher UCLA scores tended to have lower surgeon expectations of improving walking ability (r = −0.34; P = 0.007) but higher expectations for improved athletic ability (r = 0.25; P = 0.04), and surgeons anticipated more improvement in walking for patients with higher stiffness (r = 0.31, P = 0.01) and pain (r = 0.38, P = 0.002). Similarly, patients with higher Short Form-12 physical component summary had lower surgeon expectations of improvement in walking ability (r = −0.40, P = 0.002) and stiffness (r = −0.35, P = 0.006). In the most domains there was frequent discrepancy between patient and surgeon expectations, with patients being more optimistic than their surgeons in every domain. For the pain domain, patients and surgeons had similar expectations.

Effect of an e-Learning Tool on Expectations and Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Orthopedic surgeons recognize patient expectations of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be managed through education. E-learning is the application of educational technology. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether an e-learning tool could affect whether patients' expectations were met and they were satisfied 1 year following TKA.

METHODS

Patients with osteoarthritis from the London Health Sciences Centre, Canada, were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 207) receiving standard patient education or an intervention group (n = 209) using the e-learning tool in addition to the standard. We used a web-based system with permuted block sizes, stratified by surgeon and first or second TKA. Preoperative measures were completed following the patients' preadmission clinic visit. Postoperative patient-reported outcome measures were completed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after TKA. One year after TKA, risk difference was used to determine between-group differences for patient satisfaction and expectations being met.

RESULTS

One year postoperatively, the risk that expectations of patients were not met was 21.8% in the control group and 21.4% in the intervention group for an adjusted risk difference of 1.3% (95% confidence interval, -7.8% to 10.4%, P = .78). The proportion of patients satisfied with their TKA at 1 year postoperative was 78.6% in the intervention and 78.2% in the control groups.

CONCLUSION

There was no between-group difference at 1 year between intervention and control groups for either the risk that expectations of patients were not met or the proportion of patients who were dissatisfied with their TKA.

Patients' expectations of shoulder instability repair

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare patient expectations of primary and revision shoulder stabilization and to assess the factors associated with patients' expectations.

METHODS

Pre-operative patient expectations after shoulder instability repair were prospectively assessed using a self-designed questionnaire. The survey included questions on the expected level and type of return to sports, instability, pain, risk of osteoarthritis, and overall shoulder condition.

RESULTS

One-hundred and forty-five patients (99 primary; 46 revision repair) were included. A return to sport at the same level with slight to no restrictions was expected in 95%, a return to high-risk activities in 34%, to moderate in 58%, and to low-risk activities in 9%. No pain [instability] independent of the activity level was expected by 71% [79%] and occasional pain [instability] during contact and overhead activities by 25% [19%]. 61% expected to have no risk of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, 37% a slight, and 2% a significant risk. The overall expectation for the post-operative shoulder was indicated to be normal or nearly normal in 99% of patients. The revision group did not differ from the primary repair group in any variable. High pre-operative sport performance was positively correlated with post-operative sport expectations. The number of dislocations, the duration of instability, and the subjective instability level were negatively correlated with return to sport expectations.

CONCLUSION

Patient expectations for primary and revision shoulder instability repair are high. Realistic patient expectations regarding the surgical procedure are necessary to avoid low patient satisfaction, especially in pre-operatively highly active and demanding athletes. The surgeon must not solely base the treatment on the pathology and possible risk factors for failure but should also take the individual expectation of the patient into account.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Construct validation and correlates of preoperative expectations of postsurgical recovery in persons undergoing knee replacement: baseline findings from a randomized clinical trial

Background

A patient’s recovery expectations prior to knee arthroplasty influence postsurgical outcome and satisfaction but a unidimensional measure of expectation has not been reported in the literature. Our primary purpose was to determine the extent to which a patient expectations scale reflects a unidimensional construct. Our second purpose was to identify pre-operative variables associated with patients’ expectations. We hypothesized that previously identified predictors of the latent expectation scale score would be associated with expectations and that previously unexplored variables of pain catastrophizing, depressive and anxiety symptoms, self-efficacy and number of painful body regions would also associate with pre-operative expectations.

Methods

Our randomized clinical trial had 384 patients assessed prior to knee replacement surgery. The expectations scale along with several predictor variables including WOMAC, psychological distress, and sociodemographic variables were obtained. Confirmatory factor analysis tested the unidimensionality of the measure and structural equation modeling identified predictors of the latent expectations measure.

Results

The expectations scale was found to be unidimensional with superior model fit (χ2 = 1.481; df = 2; p = 0.224; RMSEA = 0.035; 90% CI = [0–0.146]; CFI = 0.999; TLI = 0.993). The only variable significantly associated with expectations in the multivariate model was self-efficacy.

Conclusions

The expectations scale used in our study demonstrated unidimensionality and has strong potential for clinical application. Poor self-efficacy is a potential target for intervention given its independent association with expectation. Addressing expectations directly and indirectly through self-efficacy assessment may assist in better aligning patient’s expectations with likely outcome.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01620983.

Enhancing Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty

There have been multiple successful efforts to improve and shorten the recovery period after elective total joint arthroplasty. The development of rapid recovery protocols through a multidisciplinary approach has occurred in recent years to improve patient satisfaction as well as outcomes. Bundled care payment programs and the practice of outpatient total joint arthroplasty have provided additional pressure and incentives for surgeons to provide high-quality care with low cost and complications. In this review, the evidence for modern practices are reviewed regarding patient selection and education, anesthetic techniques, perioperative pain management, intraoperative factors, blood management, and postoperative rehabilitation.