Discharge to Inpatient Facilities After Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Increased Postdischarge Morbidity

Predictors of Discharge Home Versus Inpatient Rehabilitation Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty-Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to identify the prevalence of inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) use in an Australian private total joint arthroplasty (TJA) cohort and to identify factors predictive of IPR discharge, including components of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT).

METHODS

Primary TJA patients at a Sydney private hospital, between 2021 and 2022 were identified from an institutional arthroplasty database. Variables previously deemed as predictive factors for IPR facility discharge in the literature and components of RAPT were assessed utilising multivariable generalised linear model analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 733 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 776 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients included, 46% of THA and 64% of TKA subjects transferred to IPR post-acutely. Bilateral procedure (OR 7.91, p < 0.001), living alone (OR 5.23, p < 0.001), older age groups (66-75 (OR 2.14, p = 0.001)); (> 75 (OR 5.02, p < 0.001)), poorer walking distance (1-2 blocks (OR 1.64, p = 0.023)); (housebound (OR 2.68, p = 0.009)), were significant predictors of IPR following THA. In the TKA cohort, the significant predictors of IPR discharge were female (OR 2.47, p < 0.001), older age (66-75 (OR 1.73, p = 0.021)); (> 75 (OR 4.23, p < 0.001)), bilateral procedure (OR 6.86, p < 0.001), obesity (OR 1.76, p = 0.006), living alone (OR 2.86, p = 0.001) and surgeon (surgeon 3 (OR 2.30, p = 0.024)); (surgeon 4 (OR 3.04, p = 0.003)); (surgeon 5 (OR 2.18, p = 0.046)).

CONCLUSION

The use of IPR following TJA was associated with some clinically justifiable factors, such as bilateral procedure, older age, and living alone. However, other variables may be driven by inappropriate and potentially modifiable societal expectations, such as being female, obesity, treating surgeon, and limited walking distance.

Patient-Level Factors, Outcomes, and Costs Associated With Facility Transfer Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Database Study

BACKGROUND

Patient disposition following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has major implications for patient outcomes and costs. Current studies are limited in sample size and dates of data collection. We evaluated patient factors, outcomes, and costs associated with disposition to a facility following TKA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including 1,906,670 patients undergoing TKA from a nationwide database, from the years 2016 to 2020. Of these, 25,485 (1.34%) patients were transferred to a facility for rehabilitation. Demographic data, hospital-related outcomes, and postoperative complications were collected. Multivariate regression was performed to assess outcomes associated with facility transfer for rehabilitation.

RESULTS

Patients were more likely to be transferred if they were women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.10; P < 0.001), greater than 80 years (OR = 2.25; P < 0.001), had an increased Elixhauser comorbidity index (OR = 1.38; P < 0.001), or were in the lowest income quartile (OR = 1.38; P < 0.001). Transferred patients were more likely to experience medical (OR = 1.92; P < 0.001) and surgical complications (OR = 2.74; P < 0.001), including vascular complications (OR = 2.07; P < 0.001), neurologic complications (OR = 5.72; P < 0.001), and dislocation (OR = 2.01; P < 0.001). They also had greater hospital lengths of stay (OR = 5.27; P < 0.001) and hospital charges (OR = 1.88; P < 0.001); however, they were less likely to undergo reoperation within 30 days (OR = 0.61; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly, lower income patients who had more comorbidities are more likely to be transferred to a facility following TKA. While there are associated increased costs, complications, and hospital lengths of stay, there are lower rates of reoperation for those who transferred to a facility after TKA.

Discharge to Post-Acute Care Facility After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Worse Mental Health Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Discharging total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients to post-acute care facilities remains a common practice, particularly in elderly patients who have major comorbidities. Efforts have been made to limit discharge to these facilities to avoid increased health care costs and potentially improve outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of TKA patients discharging to a facility versus home.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using the Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after Hip and Knee Replacement database of TKA patients who were discharged to a facility or home between 2016 and 2019. Propensity score matching was used to create comparable groups of patients. The PROs, including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS Jr) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global physical health (GPH), and PROMIS global mental health (GMH) were collected pre- and post-operatively. Outcomes were assessed between the two groups using general linear models.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, a total of 942 patients (471 home, 471 facility) were included in the study. The KOOS Jr. scores were not significantly different between the two groups at any time point, and both groups saw significant improvement in scores from baseline to the 1-month visit. Patients discharged to a post-acute care facility had significantly worse scores on both the PROMIS GPH and GMH scores at all time points despite an initial increase from preoperative baseline. Nonhome discharge patients had declining GMH scores at the 3-month and 6-month visits, whereas in the home discharge cohort, GMH scores continued to rise.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest discharge disposition may influence PROs in matched patients following TKA. Similar trajectories of improvement were seen in KOOS Jr. and GPH scores. The GMH scores started lower and declined after the 1-month time point in the nonhome group. Further study is required to determine if the discharge to a post-acute care facility is causal in the declining mental health scores seen in that cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty With Either the Direct Anterior or Posterior Approaches: A Propensity Score Match Study

BACKGROUND

Bilateral hip osteoarthritis is evident in approximately 20% of patients who present to the clinic for evaluation of hip pain, and for those undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), 22% will end up needing a contralateral THA. The risk and benefits of simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SBTHA) versus staged bilateral THA procedures have been well studied, demonstrating equivalent safety profiles comparable to unilateral and SBTHA. However, the influence of the surgical approach on SBTHA on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. We sought to compare perioperative outcomes and complication rates between the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) in patients undergoing SBTHA.

METHODS

We performed a 1:1 propensity score match based on age, sex, and body mass index. A total of 252 patients were available after matching, 126 patients in the DAA group and 126 in the PA group. Perioperative outcomes as well as surgical complications at the latest follow-up were retrospectively collected for each group. The mean follow-up was 36.7 months (range, 12.5 to 74.4).

RESULTS

A SBTHA with DAA had significantly shorter surgical time (P < 0.001), anesthesia time (P < 0.001), and length of stay (P < 0.001), compared to the PA. A greater percentage of patients in the DAA group (91%) were discharged home compared to the PA group (57%) (P < 0.001). There were no differences in in-hospital complications (P = 0.617), 90-day complications (P = 0.605), or reoperation rates (P = 0.309) between surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

A SBTHA, either through the DAA or PA, can be safely performed with low complication rates. The DAA in the setting of SBTHA provides shorter surgical times, a shorter length of stay, and a greater percentage of patients discharged home.

Conception of a mobile health application targeting early postoperative physiotherapeutic care after total knee replacement, a qualitative study

Introduction

Mobile applications targeting physiotherapeutic care after total joint replacements are increasing in popularity among end-users. However, these applications were primarily conceived out of financial interest and lack an evidence-based programs tailored to the specific needs of the target population. The primary objective of this study is to describe the conception of an evidence-based mobile health application that targets early postoperative physiotherapeutic care after total knee replacement (TKR).

Methods

A literature search of eHealth applications targeting physical therapy after TKR was carried out. Articles were then screened and suggestions as well as recommendations were extracted to inform the design of a new application. The beta version of the application was then passed onto experts for evaluation. Final changes were then undertaken to account for the expert's opinions.

Results

Several reviews with recommendations for the design of applications targeting patients after total joint replacement were identified. Primarily, mobile applications targeting rehabilitative care after TKR need to be tailored to the needs of the elderly population. Additionally, no unified rehabilitative physiotherapeutic (PT) program was found reflecting a discrepancy regarding what exercises are most useful. A comparison of different programs yielded no significant difference favoring one single exercise regimen.

Discussion

As the elderly population was shown to be less proficient regarding the use of new technologies, the application at hand was explicitly made simple. Elements of different PT programs were incorporated and quadriceps strengthening exercises were included. application was composed based on the findings of the reviewed literature and then subsequently modified to incorporate the expert's suggestions. Experts mainly expressed concerns regarding the safety of patients during unsupervised physical therapy as well as the safety of the recorded data. Thus, password protection and a split between the physician's and the patient's interface was created.

Preoperative Risk Factors for Discharge to Facility After Surgery in Geriatric Patients

BACKGROUND

The Geriatric Surgery Verification Program (GSV) was developed to address perioperative care for patients ≥75 years, with a goal of improving outcomes and functional abilities after surgery. We sought to evaluate preoperative factors that place patients at risk for inability to return home (ie, discharge to a facility).

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients ≥75 years old who underwent inpatient surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 at a referral Veterans Administration Medical Center enrolled in the GSV program. Preoperative factors included fall history, mobility aids, housing status, function, cognition, and nutritional status. Postoperative outcomes were discharge designations as home and home with services compared to a facility (skilled nursing facility and acute rehab). Exclusion criteria included preoperative facility residence, cardiac surgery, hospital transfer, postoperative complications, hospice discharge, or in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

605 patients met inclusion criteria and 173 (29%) excluded as above. Of the remaining 432 patients, mean age was 79 ± 5 and the majority were male, 426 (99%). The majority of patients were discharged home, 388 (90%), compared to a facility, 44 (10%). Patients with a fall history (OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.56, 5.57), utilizing a mobility aid (OR: 6.0, 95% CI: 2.8, 12.83), were partial or totally dependent (OR: 4.83, 95% CI: 2.29, 10.17), or who lived alone (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.08, 6.07) had higher rates of discharge to a facility.

DISCUSSION

Preoperative mobility compromise and functional dependence are associated with higher rates of discharge to a facility. These preoperative factors are possibly modifiable with multidisciplinary care teams to decrease risks of facility placement.

Aspirin is Not for Everyone: Discharge to Non-home Facilities After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

Background

Patients discharged to non-home facilities (NHD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty experience higher rates of adverse events and may require more aggressive venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis. Our aim was to compare the rates of VTE in NHD patients and those discharged home (HD) after THA/TKA. Our secondary aim was to determine VTE rates within HD and NHD groups when stratified by chemoprophylactic regimen.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of primary THA and TKA patients were stratified into HD and NHD, then allocated into groups by chemoprophylactic regimen on discharge: aspirin alone (AA), more aggressive (MA) chemoprophylaxis, and other regimens (other). The primary outcome was VTE. Rates of VTE in HD and NHD patients, as well as AA and MA regimens, were analyzed using a generalized linear regression model.

Results

Six thousand three hundred seventy-nine patients were included with 1.03% experiencing VTE. HD had lower rates of VTE compared to NHD (0.83% vs 2.17%, P < .001). AA had similar rates of VTE compared to MA (0.99% vs 1.08%, P = .82). NHD patients had a lower VTE rate with MA vs AA prophylaxis (1.47% vs 3.83%, P = .016). HD patients treated with AA vs MA had no difference in VTE rates (0.76% vs 0.96%, P = .761).

Conclusions

NHD patients have higher rates of VTE than HD patients. However, NHD patients have significantly lower rates of VTE on MA chemoprophylaxis compared to those on AA. Providers should consider prescribing MA VTE chemoprophylaxis for NHD patients. Prospective, randomized studies are necessary to confirm these recommendations.

Comparative outcomes after treatment of peri-implant, periprosthetic, and interprosthetic femur fractures: which factors increase mortality risk?

Objectives

To compare mortality rates between patients treated surgically for periprosthetic fractures (PPF) after total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), peri-implant (PI), and interprosthetic (IP) fractures while identifying risk factors associated with mortality following PPF.

Design

Retrospective.

Setting

Single, Level II Trauma Center.

Patients/Participants

A retrospective review was conducted of 129 consecutive patients treated surgically for fractures around a pre-existing prosthesis or implant from 2013 to 2020. Patients were separated into 4 comparison groups: THA, TKA, PI, and IP fractures.

Intervention

Revision implant or arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), percutaneous screws, or a combination of techniques.

Main Outcome Measurements

Primary outcome measures include mortality rates of different types of PPF, PI, and IP fractures at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative. We analyzed risk factors associated with mortality aimed to determine whether treatment type affects mortality.

Results

One hundred twenty-nine patients were included for final analysis. Average follow-up was similar between all groups. The overall 1-year mortality rate was 1 month (5%), 3 months (12%), 6 months (13%), 1 year (15%), and 2 years (22%). There were no differences in mortality rates between each group at 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (P-value = 0.86). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated no difference in survivorship up to 2 years. Older than 65 years, history of hypothyroidism and dementia, and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) led to increased mortality. There was no survival benefit in treating patients with PPFs with either revision, ORIF, IMN, or a combination of techniques.

Conclusion

The overall mortality rates observed were 1 month (5%), 3 months (12%), 6 months (13%), 1 year (15%), and 2 years (22%), and no differences were found between each group at all follow-up time points. Patients aged 65 and older with a history of hypothyroidism and/or dementia discharged to an SNF are at increased risk for mortality. From a mortality perspective, surgeons should not hesitate to choose the surgical treatment they feel most comfortable performing.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Racial disparities in post-operative complications and discharge destination following total joints arthroplasty: a national database study

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to explore race-based differences in 30-day complication rates following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) using a large national database.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary, elective THA and TKA between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed using the ACS-NSQIP. We compared Black and Hispanic patients with non-Hispanic White patients using multivariate statistical models adjusting for demographic, operative, and medical characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 324,795 and 200,023 patients undergoing THA and TKA, respectively, were identified. After THA, compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to be diagnosed with VTE (p < 0.001), receive a blood transfusion (p < 0.001), and to be discharged to an inpatient facility (p < 0.001). After TKA, compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to experience a major complication (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively), be diagnosed with VTE (p < 0.001), and be discharged to a facility (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate higher rates of VTE, blood transfusions, and discharge to an inpatient facility for Black and Hispanic patients when compared to White patients following TJA, though we are unable to comment on the etiology of these disparities. These results may contribute to a growing divide with respect to outcomes and access to TJA for these at-risk patient populations.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Associated with Cost Savings during Postoperative Pain Management in Fragility Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures

BACKGROUND

Intertrochanteric hip fractures are among the most common and most expensive diagnoses in the Medicare population. Liposomal bupivacaine is a novel preparation of a commonly used analgesic agent that, when used intraoperatively, decreases narcotic requirements and hospital length of stay and increases the likelihood of discharge to home. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether there was an economic benefit to utilizing intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine in patients with fragility intertrochanteric hip fractures in comparison to a group of patients who did not receive liposomal bupivacaine.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study performed at two academic medical centers. Fifty-six patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with cephalomedullary nail implant who received standard hip fracture pain management protocol were compared to a cohort of 46 patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures who received additional intraoperative injections of liposomal bupivacaine. All other standards of care were identical. A cost analysis was completed including the cost of liposomal bupivacaine, operating room costs, and discharge destination. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Although the length of hospital stay was similar between the two groups (3.2 days vs. 3.8 days, p = 0.08), patients receiving intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine had a lower likelihood of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (84.8% vs. 96.4%, p = 0.002) and a longer operative time (73.4 minutes vs 67.2 minutes, p = 0.004). The cost-benefit analysis indicated that for an investment of $334.18 in the administration of 266 mg of liposomal bupivacaine, there was a relative saving of $1,323.21 compared to the control group. The benefit-cost ratio was 3.95, indicating a $3.95 benefit for each $1 spent in liposomal bupivacaine.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increased initial cost, intraoperative use of liposomal bupivacaine was found to be a cost-effective intervention due to the higher likelihood of discharge to home during the postoperative management of patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Longitudinal observational study on health literacy and clinical outcomes in older adults with total knee arthroplasty in the context of inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation

Purpose

To assess health literacy (HL) of patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and evaluate its impact on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) as well as investigating outcome differences in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation.

Methods

In this study, HL and PROMs of older patients were assessed preoperatively (T0) and after 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) months. HL was assessed with the short form of the European HL Questionnaire; pain scores, functional restrictions, and activity levels with standardized PROMs.

Results

Limited HL was observed in 70.6% of patients at T0. HL improved from baseline to follow-ups (p < 0.001). There was no impact of HL on PROMs. Pain scores were higher in patients undergoing outpatient rehabilitation (p = 0.022). No differences were found between the rehabilitation settings for the other outcomes.

Conclusion

The study shows that limited HL is prevalent in patients with scheduled TKA. Rehabilitation seems to have a positive effect on increasing HL.

Discharge to inpatient care facilities following hip fracture surgery: incidence, risk factors, and 30-day post-discharge outcomes

BACKGROUND

Discharge to an inpatient care facility (skilled-care or rehabilitation) has been shown to be associated with adverse outcomes following elective total joint arthroplasties. Current evidence with regard to hip fracture surgeries remains limited.

METHODS

The 2015-2016 ACS-NSQIP database was used to query for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation for hip fractures. A total of 15,655 patients undergoing hip fracture surgery were retrieved from the database. Inpatient facility discharge included discharges to skilled-care facilities and inpatient rehabilitation units. Multi-variate regression analysis was used to assess for differences in 30-day post-discharge outcomes between home-discharge versus inpatient care facility discharge, while adjusting for baseline differences between the 2 study populations.

RESULTS

A total of 12,568 (80.3%) patients were discharged to an inpatient care facility. Discharge to an inpatient care facility was associated with higher odds of any complication (OR 2.03 [95% CI, 1.61-2.55]; p < 0.001), wound complications (OR 1.79 [95% CI, 1.10-2.91]; p = 0.019), cardiac complications (OR 4.49 [95% CI, 1.40-14.40]; p = 0.012), respiratory complication (OR 2.29 [95% CI, 1.39-3.77]; p = 0.001), stroke (OR 7.67 [95% CI, 1.05-56.29]; p = 0.045, urinary tract infections (OR 2.30 [95% CI, 1.52-3.48]; p < 0.001), unplanned re-operations (OR 1.37 [95% CI, 1.03-1.82]; p = 0.029) and readmissions (OR 1.38 [95% CI, 1.16-1.63]; p < 0.001) following discharge.

CONCLUSION

Discharge to inpatient care facilities versus home following hip fracture surgery is associated with higher odds of post-discharge complications, re-operations and readmissions. These results stress the importance of careful patient selection prior to discharge to inpatient care facilities to minimise the risk of complications.

Effects of Skilled Nursing Facility Partnerships on Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Post-total joint arthroplasty (TJA) discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) is associated with higher costs and more complications than home discharge; however, some patients still require postoperative SNF care. To improve outcomes for patients requiring postoperative SNF care, this article analyzed the effect of SNF-surgeon partnerships on TJA postoperative costs and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of primary TJA patients who were part of Medicare's Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) pilot program at our urban, academic medical center. We identified all patients discharged to SNF and designated SNFs as "preferred" if they maintained a partnership with our surgical team. SNF costs, total 90-day postoperative costs, average length of stay in SNF, 90-day readmission rates, and readmission diagnoses were recorded. Data were compared using Student t-tests. Readmission rates and the presence of a readmission diagnosis were analyzed using z-scores.

RESULTS

Our search identified 189 patients (22.9%) discharged to SNFs, with 128 (67.8%) discharged to preferred and 61 (32.2%) discharged to nonpreferred facilities. Over the 4-year CJR pilot program, SNF costs ($10,981.23 versus $7,343.34; P < 0.005) and overall postdischarge costs ($23,952.52 versus $18,339.26; P = 0.07) were higher for patients discharged to nonpreferred SNFs versus preferred SNFs. Patients discharged to nonpreferred SNFs also had increased length of stay (14.8 versus 10.1 days; P < 0.005) and increased readmission rates (19.7% versus 3.9%; P < 0.005). These differences became more pronounced across the study period.

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing primary TJA, hospital partnership with SNFs can improve CJR performance by cost reduction and overall outcomes for TJA patients.

Does Hospital Teaching Status Matter? Impact of Hospital Teaching Status on Pattern and Incidence of 90-day Readmissions After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Given financial and clinical implications of readmissions after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the potential for varied expenditures related to a hospital’s teaching status, this study sought to characterize 90-day hospital readmission patterns and assess likelihood of readmission based on teaching designation of a Medicare beneficiaries’ (MB’s) index THA hospital.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 2016-2018 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked data identified primary THA hospitalizations and readmissions within 90 days. Hospitals were categorized as teaching or nonteaching (Council of Teaching Hospitals and Health Systems). Chi-squared analysis and Fisher exact test assessed differences between readmission hospitals and the index hospital teaching status. Multivariate logistic regression models estimated risk-adjusted probability of experiencing at least one 90-day readmission.

Results

Analysis identified 433,959 index THA admissions with an all-cause 90-day readmission rate of 9.12%. Most readmissions were to the same hospital regardless of index THA hospital teaching status (67.5% index teaching; 68.2% index nonteaching). Crossover in hospital teaching status from the index procedure to readmission location was more common for those with index THA at a teaching hospital (18.9%) than for MBs with index THA performed at a nonteaching hospital (6.2%). Controlling for patient characteristics, no significant relationship was found between 90-day readmission and index hospital teaching status (odds ratio 0.98, confidence interval 0.947–1.011).

Conclusions

Overall, while certain patterns of readmission after the index THA were observed, after controlling for patient characters and comorbidities, there was no significant association between 90-day all-cause readmission and index hospital teaching status.

Early Discharge After Total Hip Arthroplasty at an Urban Tertiary Care Safety Net Hospital: A 2-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have shown that shorter inpatient stays after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are safe and effective for select patient populations with limited medical comorbidity and perioperative risk. The purpose of our study was to compare the postoperative complications because they relate to the length of hospital stay at a safety net hospital in the urban area of the United States.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 236 patients who underwent primary THA in 2017 at an urban safety net hospital. We collected data on demographics, medical comorbidities, and surgical admission information. Patients were categorized as "early discharge" if they were discharged on postoperative day 0 to 1 and "standard discharge" if they were discharged on postoperative day 2 to 5. The outcomes of interest were 90-day and 2-year postoperative complications, emergency department visit, readmissions, and revision surgeries. Data were analyzed using t-test or chi-square test for univariate analysis and linear logistic regression for controlled analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with the standard discharge group, there were markedly more male patients in the early discharge group (44.5% versus 80%). Early discharge patients were markedly younger (53.3 versus 59.5 years old), more likely to be White/non-Hispanic (64.4% versus 42.4%) and less likely to have heart disease and diabetes (2.2% versus 15.2% and 2.2% versus 19.9%, respectively). With adjustment for these potential confounders, no notable difference was observed in all-type complications, emergency department visits, readmission, or revision surgery between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

This study confirmed that early discharge after THA is as safe as standard discharge in a safety net hospital with appropriate preoperative risk screening. Increased perioperative counseling and optimization of social and medical risk factors mitigated possible risk factors for increased length of stay and surgical complication.

A Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Comparison in FNF and OA Patients

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. Femoral neck fracture (FNF) and osteoarthritis (OA) are two of the medical conditions necessitating a hip replacement, most frequently carried out. The preoperative and postoperative pathways for patients suffering from these two diseases differ, yet worldwide, many national healthcare systems underestimate or misinterpret the (more than nuanced) care plan differences of the two. Factors and Criteria. Analyzed material was gathered from studies published between 2013 and 2019. Various strands of data demographics, comorbidities, and complications, as well as treatment outcomes, were tabulated to compare and contrast THA patients suffering from FNF and OA to collate their findings. Outcomes were cross-checked and validated for reliability and then were presented in a table format.

RESULTS

All five retrospective cohort studies fitted the required criteria for inclusion in this work, four US-based study groups and one European-based study group. Data were gathered from three separate databases. The "average" FNF patient is 76.8 years old. There was a 68.96% female probability. The "average" OA patient is 69.15 years old. There was a 5.24% female probability. 59.57% operated for athrosis, and only 34.63% operated for fracture which received grade lower than the third in the American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) classification. There was more than 3 times higher prevalence of complications in the trauma group. FNF patients' hospitalization was approximately 3 days longer. On average, 3.7% of patients operated for trauma and 1.5% of patients with elective THA required a second surgery. 6.57% FNF and 2.93% OA patients had unplanned readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, patients who suffer a femoral neck fracture are an extremely fragile group. They require additional perioperative and postoperative care. To meet these desired expectations, more FNF cost-comprehensive systems need to be initiated.

Risk Factors for Readmissions After Total Joint Replacement: A Meta-Analysis

»

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies examining the risk of readmission after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to synthesize key risk factors and evaluate their pooled effects. Our analysis entailed 15 compliant studies for qualitative review and 17 compliant studies for quantitative meta-analysis.

»

A qualitative review of 15 predictive modeling studies highlighted 5 key risk factors for risk of readmission after THA and/or TKA: age, length of stay, readmission reduction policy, use of peripheral nerve block, and type of joint replacement procedure.

»

A meta-analysis of 17 studies unveiled 3 significant risk factors: discharge to a skilled nursing facility rather than to home (approximately 61% higher risk), surgery at a low- or medium-procedure-volume hospital (approximately 26% higher risk), and the presence of patient obesity (approximately 34% higher risk). We demonstrated clinically meaningful relationships between these factors and moderator variables of procedure type, source of data used for model-building, and the proportion of male patients in the cohort.

»

We found that many studies did not adhere to gold-standard criteria for reporting and study construction based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) and NOS (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) methodologies.

»

We recommend that these risk factors be considered in clinical practice and future work alike as they relate to surgical, discharge, and care decision-making. Future work should also prioritize greater observance of gold-standard reporting criteria for predictive models.

Health literacy and clinical outcomes in patients with total knee arthroplasty in different rehabilitation settings: An exploratory prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Limited health literacy is associated with negative clinical outcomes. Although research on health literacy has increased in recent years, there is still a lack of evidence for orthopaedic patients undergoing joint replacement and in the rehabilitation sector.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess health literacy of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to observe its course during rehabilitation. Furthermore, we aimed to investigate associations between health literacy and clinical outcomes as well as differences regarding rehabilitation settings.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, data about (n = 92) patients' health literacy and clinical outcomes were collected. Baseline assessments were conducted preoperatively (T0) and followed-up after three (T1) and six (T2) months. Health literacy was assessed with the European Health Literacy Questionnaire, pain scores, functional restrictions and activity levels with standardised patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Subgroup analyses were conducted regarding inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation.

RESULTS

Out of 92 patients, 77 completed postoperative rehabilitation between T0 and T1. Health literacy improved from T0 to T1 (p < 0.001) and subsequently remained constant until T2. Although the study showed an average improvement in health literacy scores in post-discharge rehabilitation, subgroup analyses indicated that patients did not achieve higher levels of health literacy. Pain scores were higher in patients undergoing outpatient rehabilitation (p = 0.022). No differences were found in other outcomes regarding rehabilitation settings and health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, there seems to be no association between health literacy and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the results regarding health literacy over the rehabilitation period indicated a need for enhancement of educational strategies to strengthen health literacy in the context of inpatient and outpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation.

The Effect of a Discharge Disposition Algorithm on Patient Outcomes and Satisfaction

Total joint arthroplasties are one of the most common procedures performed in the United States. As changes have occurred in the surgical techniques of these procedures, postoperative recovery time has decreased and patients have been able to safely transition to home rather than a post-acute care facility. The demand for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is expected to grow 44% as the prevalence of lower extremity osteoarthritis continues to rise (Sher et al., 2017) because of an aging baby boomer population. In the next 20 years, it is expected that the demand for total hip arthroplasty will grow by 174% and demand for total knee arthroplasty will grow by as much as 670% (Napier et al., 2013). An area with high variability in the postoperative period is in postdischarge rehabilitation. Post-acute inpatient care can account for up to 36% of the bundled costs of a TJA. There is a lack of evidence that patients recover better or have decreased complications by transitioning to an inpatient rehabilitation setting compared with transitioning to home. The aims of this literature search were to (a) identify the safest discharge disposition for patients following TJA; (b) determine the rate of complications and readmissions among those discharged to skilled nursing facility, inpatient rehabilitation unit, and home; and (c) explore how specified care pathways affect patient expectations and outcomes. The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, ProQuest, and Cochrane were searched using the following key terms: discharge disposition, total joint arthroplasty, joint replacement, hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, care pathway, discharge outcomes and readmissions, discharge protocols, and discharge algorithms. Five key themes emerged. Patients with significant comorbidities may require longer length of stay in the hospital or potentially discharge to a facility, discharge to facility associated with high rate of complications, setting patient expectations increases likelihood of discharge home, discharge to inpatient facilities does not improve outcomes, and discharge to any post-acute care facility is more expensive than discharge to home. This review identified themes in postoperative care of TJA patients that can be utilized to create a discharge disposition algorithm using best practices to stratify patients into the appropriate discharge disposition while setting appropriate expectations for patients undergoing these procedures to ensure high levels of patient satisfaction following these procedures.

Operative Duration and Short-Term Postoperative Complications after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Prolonged operative duration is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in many orthopedic procedures ranging from shoulder arthroscopy to total hip and knee arthroplasties. It has not been well studied in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of operative duration on complications after UKA.

METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry, we identified all primary unilateral UKAs from 2005 to 18. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on the operative duration: < 90 minutes, between 90 and 120 minutes, and >120 minutes. Baseline patient and operative demographics (age, gender, etc.) and thirty-day complications were compared using bivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the independent effect of operative duration on postoperative outcomes after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 11,806 patients who underwent primary UKA from 2005 to 18. There was no difference in the "any complication" rate between cohorts. However, operative duration >120 minutes was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of reoperation (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-3.57, P = .015), non-home discharge (OR: 2.14, CI: 1.65-2.77, P < .001), surgical site infection (OR: 1.76, CI: 1.03-3.01, P = .038), and blood transfusions (OR: 3.23, CI: 1.44-7.22, P = .004) when compared with operative duration <90 minutes. There was no difference in mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

Increased operative duration greater than 2 hours in primary UKA is associated with an increased risk of non-home discharge, surgical site infection, reoperation, and blood transfusion.

Home Discharge Has Increased After Total Hip Arthroplasty, However Rates Vary Between Large Databases

BACKGROUND

There have been significant advancements in perioperative total hip arthroplasty (THA) care and it is essential to quantify efforts made to better optimize patients and improve outcomes. The purpose of this study is to assess trends in discharge destination, length of stay (LOS), reoperations, and readmissions following THA.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary THA were identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) and Humana claims databases. Discharge destinations were assessed and categorized as home or not home. Trends in discharge destination, LOS, readmissions, reoperation, and comorbidity burden were assessed.

RESULTS

In ACS NSQIP, 155,637 patients underwent THA and the percentage of patients discharging home increased from 72.2% in 2011 to 87.0% in 2017 (P < .0001). In Humana, 84,832 THA patients were identified, with an increase in home discharge from 56.6% to 72.8% (P < .0001). LOS decreased and proportion of patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 or Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 increased significantly for both home and nonhome going patients. Patients discharged home had a decrease in readmissions in both databases.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing THA more often discharged home and had shorter hospital LOS with lower readmission rates, despite an increasingly comorbid patient population. It is likely these changes in disposition and LOS have resulted in significant cost savings for both payers and hospitals. The efforts necessary to maintain improvements should be considered when changes to reimbursement are being evaluated. ACS NSQIP hospitals had a larger proportion of patients discharged home and the source of data used to benchmark hospitals should be considered as findings may differ.

Fast track protocol for primary total hip arthroplasty in non-trauma cases reduces the length of hospital stay: Prospective French multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Fast-track (FT) procedures continue to evolve; however, their benefits are still controversial. This led us to conduct a prospective study of FT procedures for total hip arthroplasty (THA) on a national scale in France with historical control data. The aims were to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of FT procedures after THA on the length of hospital stay (LOS) in a multicenter analysis, (2) measure the immediate return to home, rehospitalization and reoperation rates.

HYPOTHESIS

FT procedures reduce the LOS after primary THA for non-traumatic indications relative to national historical data.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was done at 11 hospital facilities throughout France. Patients who underwent primary THA for a non-traumatic condition and FT procedures were followed for 3 months. The average LOS, discharge to home, unexpected readmissions, and reoperation rate were compared to 2016 figures from the French national database of 104,745 procedures on the same population.

RESULTS

The study included 1,110 patients, 499 men (45%) and 611 women (55%), with a mean age of 67.5±11.9 years. The average LOS was 3.3±2.9 days versus 7.5±5.3 days in the national database (p<0.001). Eight hundred eighty patients (79%) were discharged directly to home versus 72,577 (69%) in the national database (p<0.001). Forty-two patients (4%) were readmitted to the hospital within 90 days of the THA versus 11,092 (11%) in the national database (p<0.001). Eighteen patients (1.6%) were reoperated within 90 days of the THA procedure versus 2100 (2.0%) in the national database (p=0.72).

DISCUSSION

FT procedures help to significantly reduce the average LOS and rehospitalization rate after primary THA for non-traumatic conditions and significantly increased the percentage of patients being discharged directly to home relative to national historical data, without altering the risk of reoperation. FT procedures should become the standard of care after THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; prospective case-control study.

Which Patients Require Unexpected Admission to Postacute Care Facilities After Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons prefer to discharge patients home due to patient preferences, improved outcomes, and decreased costs. Despite an institutional protocol to send total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients home, some patients still required postacute care (PAC) facilities. This study aimed to create two predictive models based on preoperative and postoperative risk factors to identify which patients require PAC facilities.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 2,372 patients undergoing primary unilateral THA at a single institution from 2012 to 2017 was done. An electronic query followed by manual review identified discharge disposition, demographic factors, comorbidities, and other patient factors. Of the 2,372 patients, 6.2% were discharged to skilled nursing facilities or inpatient rehabilitation facilities and 93.8% discharged home. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to create two predictive models for patient discharge: preoperative visit and postoperative hospital course.

RESULTS

Of 45 variables evaluated, 7 were found to be notable predictors for PAC facility discharge. In descending order, these included age 65 years or greater, non-Caucasian race, history of depression, female sex, and greater comorbidities. In addition to preoperative factors, in-hospital complications and surgical duration of 90 minutes or greater led to a higher likelihood of PAC facility discharge. Both models had excellent predictive assessments with area under curve values of 0.77 and 0.80 for the preoperative visit and postoperative models, respectively.

DISCUSSION

This study identifies both preoperative and postoperative risk factors that predispose patients to nonroutine discharges after THA. Orthopaedic surgeons may use these models to better predict which patients are predisposed to discharge to PAC facilities.

Association between interhospital transfer and morbid obesity in emergency general surgery procedures

BACKGROUND

Obese patients may have unique surgical needs. The goal of this study is to determine if there is an association between obesity and transfer in patients undergoing EGS.

METHODS

EGS patients were identified in the NSQIP 2011-2016 database. Outcome variables included interhospital transfer, days to surgery, SSI, postoperative LOS, discharge destination, and 30-day readmission. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression were utilized.

RESULTS

419,373 EGS patients were identified, and transfer status varied by obesity class. After controlling for other factors, obese patients had increased odds of interhospital transfer (OR = 1.07-1.53), SSI (OR = 1.22-1.69), and decreased odds of discharge to home (OR = 0.42-0.71, all p < 0.01) but not of 30-day readmission or delay from admission to surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese patients undergoing EGS procedures have an increased likelihood of transfer from an acute care hospital. As obese EGS patients are increasingly prevalent, determining best triage practices for this unique patient population warrants additional investigation.

High-Quality Skilled Nursing Facilities Are Associated With Decreased Episode-of-Care Costs Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

With the increasing popularity of alternative payment models following total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), efforts have focused on reducing post-acute care (PAC) costs, particularly patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The purpose of this study is to determine if preferentially discharging patients to high-quality SNFs can reduce bundled payment costs for primary THA and TKA.

METHODS

At our institution, a quality improvement initiative for SNFs was implemented at the start of 2017, preferentially discharging patients to internally credentialed facilities, designated by several quality measures. Claims data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were queried to identify patients discharged to SNF following primary total joint arthroplasty. We compared costs and outcomes between patients discharged to credentialed SNF sites and those discharged to other sites.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2018, of a consecutive series of 8778 primary THA and TKA patients, 1284 (14.6%) were discharged to an SNF. Following initiation of the program, 498 patients were discharged to an SNF, 301 (60.4%) of which were sent to a credentialed facility. Patients at credentialed facilities had significantly lower SNF costs ($11,184 vs $8198, P < .0001), PAC costs ($18,952 vs $15,148, P < .0001), and episode-of-care costs ($34,557 vs $30,831, P < .0001), with no difference in readmissions (10% vs 12%, P = .33) or complications (8% vs 6%, P = .15). Controlling for confounding variables, being discharged to a credentialed facility decreased SNF costs by $1961 (P = .0020) and PAC costs by $3126 (P = .0031) per patient.

CONCLUSION

Quality improvement efforts through partnership with selective SNFs can significantly decrease PAC costs for patients undergoing primary THA and TKA.

Fast-track procedures after primary total knee arthroplasty reduce hospital stay by unselected patients: a prospective national multi-centre study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of fast-track procedures (FTPs) on length of hospital stay after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a prospective, national, multicentric analysis. The innovative point was that no patient selection was used. The hypothesis was that FTPs reduce hospital stay after primary TKA for non-traumatic conditions compared with the national database.

METHODS

An observational prospective study was conducted in ten centres throughout France. A total of 839 patients included in FTPs were followed up for three months. The average LOS, direct return home rate, unscheduled re-admission rate, and re-intervention rate were compared with those in the national database (93,329 TKAs). Knee society and Oxford score were collected.

RESULTS

The mean LOS was 4.4 ± 3.3 days, while the national base LOS was 6.4 ± 3.1 days (p < 0.001). A total of 560 patients (66.7%) were able to return home, compared with 47,617 (49.6%) in the national database (p < 0.001). Thirty-five patients (4.2%) were re-admitted within 90 days of the intervention, compared with 10,399 (10.8%) in the national database (p < 0.001). Seventeen patients (2.0%) were re-operated upon within 90 days after the TKA, compared with 529 (0.5%) in the national database (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The FTPs used by unselected patients allowed a significant decrease in the mean LOS and in the rate of re-admission and a significant increase of the rate of direct home return after primary TKA compared with the national database. The significant increase in the re-operation rate warrants further investigation. However, FTP should become the standard of care after this intervention.

The "Hip Fracture" Bundle-Experiences, Challenges, and Opportunities

Introduction:

With growing popularity and success of alternative-payment models (APMs) in elective total joint arthroplasties, there has been recent discussion on the probability of implementing APMs for geriatric hip fractures as well.

Significance:

Despite the growing interest, little is known about the drawbacks and challenges that will be faced in a stipulated “hip fracture” bundle.

Results:

Given the varying intricacies and complexities of hip fractures, a “one-size-fits-all” bundled payment may not be an amenable way of ensuring equitable reimbursement for participating physicians and hospitals.

Conclusions:

Health-policy makers need to advocate for better risk-adjustment methods to prevent the creation of financial disincentives for hospitals taking care of complex, sicker patients. Hospitals participating in bundled care also need to voice concerns regarding the grouping of hip fractures undergoing total hip arthroplasty to ensure that trauma centers are not unfairly penalized due to higher readmission rates associated with hip fractures skewing quality metrics. Physicians also need to consider the launch of better risk-stratification protocols and promote geriatric comanagement of these patients to prevent occurrences of costly adverse events.

Variability in Discharge Disposition Across US Trauma Centers After Treatment for High-Energy Lower Extremity Injuries

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between patient- and center-level characteristics and discharge to an inpatient facility versus home after treatment for lower extremity trauma, as well as examine the variability in discharge disposition across clinical centers after controlling for these factors.

DESIGN

This is an analysis of data collected prospectively across 5 multicenter studies of extremity trauma.

SETTING

US Trauma Centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients 18-80 years with lower extremity trauma treated at 1 of 55 participating centers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Discharge disposition.

RESULTS

Among 2365 patients treated at 1 of 55 centers across 13 states, 673 (28.5%) were discharged to an inpatient facility, and 1692 (71.5%) were discharged home. Individuals who were older, female, unmarried, insured, higher body mass index, history of severe alcohol abuse, Gustilo type IIIB or IIIC open injuries, bilateral, spine and upper extremity injuries, higher injury severity score scores, or intensive care unit stay were more likely to be discharged to an inpatient facility. Even after accounting for patient- and center-level characteristics, there was substantial variation in discharge disposition across centers (likelihood ratio test: P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Variation in discharge disposition may represent a potential for improvement in resource utilization and cost savings. Further studies are needed to examine the relationship between utilization of postdischarge inpatient facility after trauma and outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Discharge destination and patient-reported outcomes after inpatient treatment for isolated lower limb fractures

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between discharge destination (home or inpatient rehabilitation) for adult patients treated in hospital for isolated lower limb fractures and patient-reported outcomes.

DESIGN

Review of prospectively collected Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR) data.

SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

Adults (18-64 years old) treated for isolated lower limb fractures at four Melbourne trauma hospitals that contribute data to the VOTOR, 1 March 2007 - 31 March 2016.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Return to work and functional recovery (assessed with the extended Glasgow Outcomes Scale, GOS-E); propensity score analysis of association between discharge destination and outcome.

RESULTS

Of 7961 eligible patients, 1432 (18%) were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation, and 6775 (85%) were followed up 12 months after their injuries. After propensity score adjustment, the odds of better functional recovery were 56% lower for patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation than for those discharged directly home (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.37-0.51); for the 5057 people working before their accident, the odds of return to work were reduced by 66% (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.26-0.46). Propensity score analysis improved matching of the discharge destination groups, but imbalances in funding source remained for both outcome analyses, and for also for site and cause of injury in the GOS-E analysis (standardised differences, 10-16%).

CONCLUSIONS

Discharge to inpatient rehabilitation after treatment for isolated lower limb fractures was associated with poorer outcomes than discharge home. Factors that remained unbalanced after propensity score analysis could be assessed in controlled trials.

Effects of a Total Knee Arthroplasty Care Pathway on Cost, Quality, and Patient Experience: Toward Measuring the Triple Aim

BACKGROUND

Care pathways are increasingly important as the shift toward value-based care continues; however, there is an inconsistent literature regarding their efficacy. The authors hypothesized that a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) care pathway, at a multihospital health system, would decrease cost, length of stay (LOS), discharges to inpatient facilities, postoperative complications at 90 days, and improve patient experience.

METHODS

A historical control study with multivariable regression was used to determine the association of an evidence-based care pathway with episode of care cost, LOS, discharge disposition, 90-day postoperative complications, and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores.

RESULTS

In total, 6760 primary TKA surgeries were analyzed. Multivariable regression demonstrated that the full protocol period was associated with a decrease in episode of care costs (-8.501%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -9.639 to -7.350), a decrease in LOS (-26.966%, 95% CI -28.516 to -25.382), and an increase in discharges to home (odds ratio [OR] 3.838, 95% CI 3.318-4.446). The full protocol was not associated with a change in 90-day complications (OR 1.067, 95% CI 0.905-1.258) or patient willingness to recommend (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.72-1.55). Adjusted episode of care cost savings, normalized to average national Medicare reimbursement, were $2360 per patient.

CONCLUSION

TKA care pathways are an effective tool for standardizing care and reducing costs across a large health system. Further investigations are needed to develop interventions to consistently reduce complications. National scale implementation of care pathways in TKA could lead to estimated cost reductions of approximately $1.6 billion annually.

Discharge Home is Associated With Decreased Early Complications Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) volume has increased over the past decade. Patients discharged home (HD) have demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes compared with non-home discharge (NHD) patients. We reviewed trends in HD over the past decade and compared complication rates between HD and NHD primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was performed on TJA cases and patients were grouped by discharge type. Trends in the prevalence of HD were compared by chi-square test, from 2011 to 2016. Univariate and bivariate statistics were performed. Multivariate logistic and propensity score-matched analyses were used to control for confounding variables.

RESULTS

During the 6-year review, HD increased significantly for THA (71.2% to 83.6%) and TKA (65.6% to 80.7%). Overall HD was 75.4% of THA and 71.0% of TKA patients. Propensity matching identified 16,580 THA pairs and 34,952 TKA pairs. Compared with NHD patients, HD patients had shorter operative times, were younger, and had shorter lengths of stay. Controlling for confounders, the HD patients had lower risk of death within 30 days, lower risk of major medical morbidity, decreased risk of reoperation, and decreased risk of readmission compared with NDH patients. Multivariate models demonstrated similar findings.

CONCLUSION

HD in both THA and TKA independently predicts decreased early (30-day) postoperative complications after controlling for confounding variables. Given the improved outcomes, we advocate for continued emphasis on HD rather than NHD when clinically appropriate.

Factors Affecting Discharge Disposition After Primary Simultaneous Bilateral Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Predicting discharge destination following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is important, as discharge destination has major implications for post-operative costs, clinical outcomes, and readmissions. Few studies have looked at factors affecting discharge destination for patients following primary simultaneous bilateral total joint arthroplasty.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to describe clinical and social factors that relate to a discharge to home versus rehabilitation facility (RF) for patients after primary simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (PSBTHA) or primary simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (PSBTKA).

METHODS

The inclusion criteria for this retrospective cohort study were all patients after PSBTHA or PSBTKA at a metropolitan orthopedic specialty hospital between February 1, 2016, and March 31, 2018. Exclusion criteria were revisions, differing weight-bearing status, bed-rest orders, and non-standard hip precautions. Social and clinical demographic data were collected. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine which factors related most to discharge plan.

RESULTS

Of 253 PSBTHA patients, 153 were discharged home and 100 to an RF. Regression analysis found a posterolateral approach to be the only significant factor associated with an RF discharge. Of 619 PSBTKA patients, 136 were discharged home and 483 to RF. Increased body mass index and older age increased the likelihood of discharge to an RF. Patients with an adductor-only nerve block were more likely to be sent to RF.

CONCLUSION

These findings shed light on the variables that contribute to discharge destination after PSBTHA and PSBTKA. Such information allows for safe pre-operative discharge planning and assists with discharge to the appropriate level of patient care. Future studies might investigate the effect of surgeon experience, surgical technique, and pre-operative discussion with a physical therapist on the discharge disposition of patients undergoing bilateral total joint arthroplasty.

The Efficacy and Safety of Inpatient Rehabilitation Compared With Home Discharge After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Total hip and knee arthroplasties (THKAs) are successful procedures in managing end-stage arthritis when nonoperative treatments fail. The immediate postoperative period is an important time for the body to recuperate and rehabilitate. Studies have shown that early intensive rehabilitation can enhance recovery. Rehabilitation can be provided as inpatient rehabilitation (IR) or discharge with home rehabilitation. These options have been studied, but literature on the efficacy and safety of IR compared to home discharge is scarce, and evidence is not well established. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of IR to home discharge with rehabilitation after THKA.

METHODS

A multidatabase search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Data from studies assessing the efficacy and safety of IR and home as discharge destinations after THKA were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included, consisting of 37,411 IR patients and 172,219 home discharge patients. These studies had heterogeneous reporting methods, with some conflicting results. There was no clinically significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups. Readmission was nearly 5 times (odds ratio = 4.87, 95% confidence interval = 3.24-7.33, P < .001) and periprosthetic complications nearly 3 times (odds ratio = 2.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.54-5.24, P < .001) higher in IR patients than those discharged home after THKA.

CONCLUSION

Although IR is associated with higher risks of complications and readmissions, this may be because of patient selection bias in the clinical setting. Following THKA, it is safe to discharge patients to home with rehabilitation whenever possible.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

Level II, Meta-analysis of heterogeneous studies.

A Nurse Navigator Program Is Effective in Reducing Episode-of-Care Costs Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Alternative payment models for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have incentivized providers to deliver higher quality care at a lower cost, prompting some institutions to develop formal nurse navigation programs (NNPs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether a NNP for primary THA and TKA resulted in decreased episode-of-care (EOC) costs.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of primary THA and TKA patients from 2015-2016 using claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Medicare Advantage patients from a private insurer. Three nurse navigators were hired to guide discharge disposition and home needs. Ninety-day EOC costs were collected before and after implementation of the NNP. To control for confounding variables, we performed a multivariate regression analysis to determine the independent effect of the NNP on EOC costs.

RESULTS

During the study period, 5275 patients underwent primary TKA or THA. When compared with patients in the prenavigator group, the NNP group had reduced 90-day EOC costs ($19,116 vs $20,418 for Medicare and $35,378 vs $36,961 for private payer, P < .001 and P < .012, respectively). Controlling for confounding variables in the multivariate analysis, the NNP resulted in a $1575 per Medicare patient (P < .001) and a $1819 per private payer patient cost reduction (P = .005). This translates to a cost savings of at least $5,556,600 per year.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a NNP resulted in a marked reduction in EOC costs following primary THA and TKA. The cost savings significantly outweighs the added expense of the program. Providers participating in alternative payment models should consider using a NNP to provide quality arthroplasty care at a reduced cost.

Changes in Discharge to Rehabilitation: Potential Unintended Consequences of Medicare Total Hip Arthroplasty/Total Knee Arthroplasty Bundled Payments, Should They Be Implemented on a Nationwide Scale?

BACKGROUND

As a part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, Medicare was committed to changing 50% of its reimbursement to alternative payment models by 2018. One strategy included introduction of "bundled payments" or a fixed price for an episode of care. Early studies of the first operative bundles for elective total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) suggest changes in discharge to rehabilitation. It remains unclear the extent to which such changes affect patient well-being. In order to address these concerns, the objective of this study is to estimate projected changes in discharge to various type of rehabilitation, 90-day outcomes, extent of therapy received, and patient health-related quality-of-life before and after introduction of bundled payments should they be implemented on a nationwide scale.

METHODS

A nationwide policy simulation was conducted using decision-tree methodology in order to estimate changes in overt and patient-centered outcomes. Model parameters were informed by published research on bundled payment effects and anticipated outcomes of patients discharged to various types of rehabilitation.

RESULTS

Following bundled payment introduction, discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities decreased by 16.9 percentage-points (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.5-17.3) among primary TKA patients (THA 16.8 percentage-points), a relative decline from baseline of 58.9%. Skilled nursing facility use fell by 24.0 percentage-points (95% CI 23.6-24.4). It was accompanied by a 36.7 percentage-point (95% CI 36.3-37.2) increase in home health agency use. Although simulation models predicted minimal changes in overt outcome measures such as unplanned readmission (TKA +0.8 percentage-points), changes in discharge disposition were accompanied by significant increases in the need for further assistive care (TKA +8.0 percentage-points) and decreases in patients' functional recovery and extent of therapy received. They collectively accounted for a 30% reduction in recovered motor gains.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate substantial changes in discharge to rehabilitation with accompanying declines in average functional outcomes, extent of therapy received, and health-related quality-of-life. Such findings challenge notions of reduced cost at no harm previously attributed to the bundled payment program and lend credence to concerns about reductions in access to facility-based rehabilitation.

Preoperative Patient Functional Status Is an Independent Predictor of Outcomes After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

This study was designed to determine whether preoperative functional status of patients with osteoarthritis predicts outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for records of patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty for a principal diagnosis of osteoarthritis from 2009 to 2013 (N=43,179). Patients were categorized as dependent or independent according to their preoperative functional status. The groups were compared regarding several potential confounders using Student's t and chi-square tests. Logistic and Poisson regression models (inclusion threshold of P<.1) were used to assess the associations of functional status with outcomes. The alpha level was set at 0.05. Compared with independent patients, dependent patients were likely to be older (mean, 70 vs 66 years, P<.01) and to have more preoperative comorbidities. After controlling for potential confounders, preoperative dependent functional status was predictive of major complications (odds ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-3.28), nonroutine discharge (odds ratio, 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 2.35-3.34), and longer hospital stay (incidence risk ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.27). Rates of unplanned reoperation were similar between groups on multivariate analysis. Compared with preoperative independent functional status, preoperative dependent functional status was independently associated with worse outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(3):e326-e330.].

Continued Inpatient Care After Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Associated With Increased Short-term Postdischarge Morbidity: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis

Advances in surgical technique and implant design during the past several decades have resulted in annual increases in shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States. The purpose of this investigation was to use the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to analyze the rates of morbidity following shoulder arthroplasty. The authors hypothesized that, independent of predischarge patient factors, discharge to inpatient facilities is associated with increased short-term morbidity. Patient demographics, intraoperative variables, and information about postoperative complications/readmissions up to 30 days after the operative event were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for the period 2005 to 2015. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on discharge to home vs non-home facilities. Unadjusted baseline patient characteristics were compared using Pearson's chi-square test, and a propensity score-adjusted comparison was also performed. Overall, 9058 patients were included. Of these, 7996 (88.3%) were discharged to home and 1062 (11.7%) were discharged to a non-home facility. On propensity-adjusted analysis, complications determined to be statistically significantly associated with non-home discharge included cardiac (odds ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-10.04; P=.001), respiratory (odds ratio, 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-4.70; P=.001), urinary tract infection (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-4.67; P=.001), and death (odds ratio, 7.51; 95% confidence interval, 2.42-23.27; P<.001). Overall, complications were statistically significantly associated with non-home discharges (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-2.64; propensity-adjusted P<.001). This investigation indicated an association between postdischarge placement into non-home facilities and an increase in short-term morbidity, regardless of preoperative patient comorbidities. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):e225-e231.].

30-day adverse events, length of stay and re-admissions following surgical management of pelvic/acetabular fractures

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic/acetabular fractures are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and cost to the society. We sought to utilize a national surgical database to assess the incidence and factors associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS), non-home discharge destination, 30-day adverse events and readmissions following surgical fixation of pelvic/acetabular fractures.

MATERIALS & METHODS

The 2011-2016 ACS-NSQIP database files were queried using CPT codes (27215, 27217, 27218, 27226, 27227, 27228) for patients undergoing open reduction/internal fixation (ORIF) for pelvic/acetabular fractures. Patients undergoing additional procedures for associated fractures (vertebral fractures, distal radius/ulna fractures or femoral neck/hip fractures) were excluded from the analysis to ensure that a relevant population of patients with isolated pelvic/acetabular injuries were included in the analysis. A total of 572 patients were included in the final cohort. Severe adverse events (SAE) were defined as: death, ventilator use >48 h, unplanned intubation, stroke, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, sepsis, septic shock, re-operation, deep SSI and organ/space SSI. Minor adverse events (MAE) included - wound dehiscence, superficial SSI, urinary tract infection (UTI) and progressive renal insufficiency. An extended LOS was defined as >75th centile (>9days).

RESULTS

Factors associated with AAE were partially dependent functional health status pre-operatively (p = 0.020), transfusion ≥1 unit of packed RBCs (p = 0.001), and ASA > II (p < 0.001). Experiencing a SAE was associated with congestive heart failure (CHF) pre-operatively [p = 0.005), total operative time >140 min (p = 0.034) and Hct <36 pre-operatively (p = 0.003). MAE was associated with transfusion≥1 unit of packed RBCs (p = 0.022) and ASA > II (p = 0.007). Patients with an ASA > II (p = 0.001), total operative time>140 min (p < 0.001) and Hct <36 (p = 0.006) were more likely to have a LOS >9 days. Male gender (p = 0.026), prior history of CHF (p = 0.024), LOS >9 days (p = 0.030) and >10% bodyweight loss in last 6 months before the procedure (p = 0.002) were predictors of 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ASA grade > II, greater co-morbidity burden and prolonged operative times were likely to experience adverse events and have a longer length of stay. Surgeons can utilize this data to risk stratify patients so that appropriate pre-operative and post-operative medical optimization can take place.

Discharge to Inpatient Care Facility Following Revision Posterior Lumbar Fusions-Risk Factors and Postdischarge Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has denoted care in an inpatient facility after discharge to be linked with worse outcomes after elective primary lumbar and cervical fusions. No study has explored the risk factors and associated postdischarge outcomes after discharge to inpatient facility after revision posterior lumbar fusion.

METHODS

The 2012-2016 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes for posterior lumbar fusions (22630, 22633, 22614) combined with Current Procedural Terminology codes for revision-22830 (exploration of spinal fusion), 22849 (reinsertion of spinal fixation device), 22850 (removal of posterior nonsegmental instrumentation), and 22852 (removal of posterior segmental instrumentation).

RESULTS

Of 1170 patients who underwent revision posterior lumbar fusion, 253 (21.6%) were discharged to an inpatient care facility and 917 (78.4%) were discharged to home. Significant risk factors associated with discharge to inpatient care facility were age 60-69 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.62), age ≥70 years (OR 7.46), female gender (OR 1.61), partially dependent functional health status before surgery (OR 2.94), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.92), a length of stay >3 days (OR 3.13), and the occurrence of any predischarge complication (OR 4.10). Discharge to inpatient care facilities versus home was associated with a higher risk of experiencing any postdischarge complication (8.3% vs. 3.2%; OR 2.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Providers should understand the need of construction of care pathways and reducing discharge to inpatient facilities to mitigate the risks of experiencing adverse outcomes and consequently reduce the financial burden on the health care system.

Discharge to Inpatient Care Facility After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Incidence, Predictors, and Postdischarge Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite a significant number of patients being discharged to inpatient care facilities after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), the current literature remains limited regarding the predictors associated with a nonhome discharge and the impact of continued inpatient care in a facility on postdischarge outcomes.

METHODS

The 2013-2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for ALIF (CPT-22558) and additional level fusions (CPT-22585). Discharge to inpatient care facilities included discharge to skilled care facilities and/or inpatient rehabilitation units.

RESULTS

Independent predictors of an inpatient care facility discharge were age older than 45 years (P < 0.001), female sex (P < 0.001), more than 10% body weight loss in the last 6 months prior to surgery (P=0.012), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade greater than II (P=0.005), undergoing a 2-level (P < 0.001) or more than 2-level fusion (P=0.017), a length of stay greater than 3 days (P < 0.001), and the occurrence of any predischarge complication (P < 0.001). After adjustment for differences in clinical and baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, discharge to an inpatient care facility after ALIF was independently associated with higher odds of any postdischarge complication (P=0.010), postdischarge wound complication (P=0.005), and postdischarge septic complications (P=0.011). No significant impact was seen on 30-day readmissions (P=0.943), 30-day reoperations (P=0.228), and 30-day mortality (P=0.913).

CONCLUSIONS

With an increasing focus toward minimizing costs associated with postacute care, providers should understand the need of appropriate preoperative risk stratification and construction of care pathways aimed at a home discharge to reduce the occurrence and/or risk of experiencing postdischarge complications.

Short-term Complications After Revision Hip Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection Are Increased Relative to Noninfectious Revisions

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with significant morbidity and cost. The purpose of this study was to determine how rates of perioperative complications, operative duration, and postoperative length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing revision THA for PJI compare to primary THA and to revision THA for non-PJI.

METHODS

We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry from 2005 to 2015 to identify all patients who underwent primary and revision THA. Patients were placed into cohorts based on the surgical procedure and by indication, including (1) primary THA, (2) revision THA for PJI, and (3) revision THA for non-PJI. Differences in 30-day postoperative medical complications, hospital readmissions, operative duration, and LOS were compared using bivariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

One lakh fourteen thousand five hundred five THA patients were identified, with 102,460 (89.5%) patients undergoing a primary THA and 12,045 (10.5%) undergoing a revision procedure. Of the 12,045 revision procedures, 10,777 (89.5%) were for non-PJI indications and 1268 (10.5%) were for PJI. Relative to primary THA, patients undergoing revision THA for PJI had an increased rate of total complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.96), sepsis (OR 13.15), deep surgical site infections (SSIs, OR 8.58), superficial SSI (OR 2.14, P = .002), nonhome discharge (OR 1.85), readmissions (OR 2.46), LOS (+3.0 days), and operative duration (+61 minutes). Compared with non-PJI revisions, PJI revisions had an increased rate of total complications (OR 2.42), sepsis (OR 5.51), deep SSI (OR 2.12), nonhome discharge (OR 1.47), and LOS (+1.8 days).

CONCLUSION

Revision THA for PJI is associated with increased postoperative complications, nonhome discharge, and LOS relative to non-PJI revision THA. Separate care pathways and reimbursement bundles should be considered for patients with PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Bundled Payments for Care Improvement in the Private Sector: A Win for Everyone

BACKGROUND

To help slow the rising costs associated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services introduced the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative. The purpose of this study is to report our 1-year experience with BPCI in our 2 arthroplasty surgeon private practice.

METHODS

In this series, a historical baseline group is compared with our first year under BPCI. We reviewed the cohorts with respect to hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, discharge disposition, postacute care LOS, and overall savings on a per episode basis.

RESULTS

The baseline group included 582 episodes from July 2009 to June 2012. The BPCI study group included 332 episodes from July 2015 to September 2016. We witnessed a substantial learning curve over the course of our involvement in the initiative. The total reduction in cost per episode for TJA was 20.0% (P = .10). Hospital LOS decreased from 4.9 to 3.5 days (P = .02). All-cause 90-day readmission rates decreased from 14.5% to 8.2% (P = .0078). Overall, discharges to home increased from 11.6% to 49.8% (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Our small, private, 2 arthroplasty surgeon orthopedic practice has shown improvement in postoperative management for TJA patients in 1 year under the BPCI initiative, with increased discharges to home, decreased skilled nursing admissions, days in skilled nursing, and overall readmissions. Because BPCI includes fracture care arthroplasty, the model could be made more equitable if these patients were reimbursed a rate commensurate with their increased costs and risks.

The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched cohort

Background

Inpatient rehabilitation is an expensive option following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to determine if THA patients who receive inpatient rehabilitation report better hip and quality of life scores post-surgery compared to those discharged directly home.

Methods

Prospective, propensity score matched cohort involving 12 private hospitals across five Australian States. Patients undergoing THA secondary to osteoarthritis were included. Those receiving inpatient rehabilitation for reasons other than choice or who experienced significant health events within 90-days post-surgery were excluded. Comparisons were made between those who did and did not receive inpatient rehabilitation for patient-reported hip pain and function (Oxford Hip Score, OHS) and ‘today’ health rating (EuroQol 0–100 scale). Rehabilitation provider charges were also estimated and compared.

Results

Two hundred forty-six patients (123 pairs, mean age 67 (10) yr., 66% female) were matched on 19 covariates for their propensity to receive inpatient rehabilitation. No statistically nor clinically significant between-group differences were observed [OHS median difference (IQR): 0 (− 3, 3), P = 0.60; 0 (− 1 to 1), P = 0.91, at 90 and 365-days, respectively; EuroQol scale median difference 0 (− 10, 12), P = 0.24; 0 (− 10, 10), P = 0.49; 5 (− 10, 15), P = 0.09, at 35-, 90- and 365-days, respectively]. Median rehabilitation provider charges were 10-fold higher for those who received inpatient rehabilitation [median difference $7582 (5649, 10,249), P <  0.001]. Sensitivity analyses corroborated the results of the primary analyses.

Conclusion

Utilization of inpatient rehabilitation pathways following THA appears to be low value healthcare. Sustainability of inpatient rehabilitation models may be enhanced if inpatient rehabilitation is reserved for those most impaired or who have limited social supports.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01899443.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2134-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Implementation of a Total Hip Arthroplasty Care Pathway at a High-Volume Health System: Effect on Length of Stay, Discharge Disposition, and 90-Day Complications

BACKGROUND

Standardized care pathways are evidence-based algorithms for optimizing an episode of care. Despite the theoretical promise of care pathways, there is an inconsistent literature demonstrating improvements in patient care. The authors hypothesized that implementing a care pathway, across 11 hospitals, would decrease hospital length of stay (LOS), decrease postoperative complications at 90 days, and increase discharges to home.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team developed an evidence-based care pathway for total hip arthroplasty (THA) perioperative care. All patients receiving THA in 2013 (pre-protocol, historical control), 2014 (transition), and 2015 (full protocol implementation) were included in the analysis. Multivariable regression assessed the relationship of the care pathway to 90-day postoperative complications, LOS, and discharge disposition. Cost savings were estimated using previously published postarthroplasty episode and per diem hospital costs.

RESULTS

A total of 6090 primary THAs were conducted during the study period. After adjusting for the covariates, the full protocol implementation was associated with a decrease in LOS (mean ratio, 0.747; 95% confidence interval [CI; 0.727, 0.767]) and an increase in discharges to home (odds ratio, 2.079; 95% CI [1.762, 2.456]). The full protocol implementation was not associated with a change in 90-day complications (odds ratio, 1.023; 95% CI [0.841, 1.245]). Payer-perspective-calculated theoretical cost savings, including both index admission and postdischarge costs, were $2533 per patient.

CONCLUSION

The THA care pathway implementation was successful in reducing LOS and increasing discharges to home. The care pathway was not associated with a change in 90-day complications; further targeted interventions in this area are needed. Despite care standardization efforts, high-volume hospitals and surgeons had higher performance. Extrapolation of theoretical cost savings indicates that widespread THA care pathway adoption could lead to national healthcare savings of $1.2 billion annually.

Discharge to Inpatient Rehab Does Not Result in Improved Functional Outcomes Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Monitored rehabilitation has long been considered an essential part of the recovery process in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal setting for rehabilitation remains uncertain. We sought to determine whether inpatient rehabilitation settings result in improved functional and patient-reported outcomes after primary TKA.

METHODS

All patients undergoing primary TKA from May 2007 to February 2011 were identified from our institutional total joint registry. Propensity score matching was then performed, resulting in a final cohort of 1213 matched pairs for discharge destination to either home or a rehabilitation facility (inpatient rehab or skilled nursing facility). Length of stay, need for manipulation, 6-month complications, and 2-year Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, 12-item Short Form Health Survey, and Hospital for Special Surgery knee expectations surveys were compared.

RESULTS

Patients discharged to a rehab facility were noted to have a shorter hospital length of stay (5.0 vs 5.4 days). Patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation reported more fractures at 6 months postoperatively. However, no differences in manipulation rates, 2-year outcome scores, or changes in outcome scores were found between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Inpatient rehabilitation settings did not result in lower complications at 6 months or improved functional or patient-reported outcomes at 2 years compared to discharge directly to home when patients are propensity matched for age, living situation, comorbidities, baseline functional status, and insurance status. This finding has important cost implications and calls into question whether the healthcare system should allow otherwise healthy patients to use inpatient rehabilitation services postoperatively after primary TKA.

Arthroplasty care redesign related to the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model: results at a tertiary academic medical center

Background

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains the highest expenditure in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) budget. One model to control cost is the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model. There has been no published literature to date examining the efficacy of CJR on value-based outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and sustainability of a multidisciplinary care redesign for total joint arthroplasty under the CJR paradigm at an academic tertiary care center.

Methods

We implemented a system-wide care redesign, affecting all patients who underwent a total hip or total knee arthroplasty at our academic medical center. The main study outcomes were cost (to CMS), discharge destination, complications and readmissions, and length of stay (LOS); these were measured using the 2017 initial CJR reconciliation report, as well as our institutional database.

Results

The study included 1536 patients (41% Medicare). Per-episode cost to CMS declined by 19.5% to 11% below the CMS-designated national target. Home discharge increased from 62% to 87%. CMS readmissions declined from 15% to 6%; major complications decreased from 2.3% to 1.9%; and LOS declined from 3.6 to 2.1 days.

Conclusions

A mandatory episode-based bundled-payment program can induce favorable changes to value-based metrics, improving quality and outcomes for health-care consumers. Quality and value were improved in this study, evidenced by lower 90-day episode cost, more home discharges, lower readmissions and complications, and shorter LOS. This approach has implications not just for CMS, but for private payers, corporate health programs, and fixed-budget health-care models.