Rapid Discharge in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Utility of the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment Tool in Predicting Same-Day and Next-Day Discharge

"Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment" (OARA) Score for Same Day Outpatient Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Multi-Center Study

BACKGROUND

The Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) Score was developed to risk-stratify patients for safe same-day discharge outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA). It has demonstrated predictive ability for length of stay in primary TJA. However, there is minimal external validity of the original studies. This multicenter database study evaluated the risk assessment and predictive ability for same-day discharge of the OARA score and clinical outcomes following primary TJA.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2023, across 40 locations, 12,809 primary TJAs (4,656 hips, 8,153 knees) were identified. A total of 5,552 and 4,974 cases had length of stay, complication, and readmission data, respectively. Overall, 1,864 (34%) patients were discharged on the same day after primary TJA. Machine learning and statistical models evaluated the predictive ability of the OARA score on same-day discharge, readmission rates, and complications within 90 days. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients who had an OARA Score < 60 and < 80 were ≥ 2.6 times more likely to be discharged on the same day of surgery. A lower OARA score was associated with proportionally fewer complications and readmissions (P ≤ 0.001). Complications and readmissions were 2.9 to 3.1 and 3.1 to 3.3 times more likely with OARA scores ≥ 60 and ≥ 80, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Study results demonstrate that patients who had lower OARA scores are more likely to be discharged the same day and have lower complication or readmission rates after primary TJA. These results from multiple centers across the United States further support the original studies and provide evidence for the continued use of the OARA score to help identify medically appropriate candidates for outpatient primary TJA.

The Predictability of the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment Score on Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Registry Analysis

BACKGROUND

The Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) Score was developed to identify surgically appropriate patients for outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA). In addition, it has shown excellent predictive ability for length of stay (LOS) following primary TJA compared to other medical risk stratification systems. However, it has not been studied in the revision TJA (rTJA) patient population. This study evaluated the OARA score's ability to predict LOS and postoperative outcomes following rTJA.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2023, 366 rTJAs (116 hips, 250 knees) performed across 17 locations were analyzed. Statistical models evaluated the predictive ability of the OARA Score on same-day or next-day discharge, complications, and readmissions within 90 days. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Overall, 156 (51%) rTJAs were discharged postoperatively on the same or the next day. A lower OARA score was a significant predictor of same- or next-day discharge, and proportionally fewer complications and readmissions (P ≤ 0.035). There were 71% of rTJAs discharged ≥ 2 days postoperatively when the OARA score was ≥ 113. Likewise, complications (19.6 versus 4.7%, P = 0.002) and readmissions (13.0 versus 3.4%, P = 0.016) were ≥ 4.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 12.8) times more likely when the OARA score was ≥ 113. For all models related to LOS, positive predictive values were great to excellent (range, 73 to 91%), while false positive rates were higher than ideal (range, 63 to 76%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study results demonstrate that a lower OARA score was predictive of same- or next-day discharge and fewer complications and readmissions following rTJA. As the burden of rTJA rises, future studies with higher sample sizes and accounting for revision etiology and the number of components revised should be conducted to further test the OARA Score's utility in the rTJA population.

Assessment of 90-Day Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty in Ambulatory Surgery Centers, Hospital Outpatient Departments, and Hospitals: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Analysis

Background

Total joint arthroplasty is shifting from hospitals to ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs). A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Quality Collaborative Initiative quality improvement project examined readmissions, emergency room (ER) visits, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), fracture, and dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) across sites.

Methods

Primary TJAs between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022 (N = 41,696: 3910 ASC, 1,834 HOPD, and 35,952 hospital) were reviewed. Of 17,100 THAs, 9.5% (1,631) were at ASCs, 4.7% (798) at HOPDs, and 85.8% (14,671) at hospitals. Of 24,596 TKAs, 9.3% (2,279) were at ASC, 4.2% (1,036) at HOPDs, and 86.5% (21,281) at hospitals. Hospitals treated more elderly, women, non-White, obese, diabetics, smokers, and governmental insurance.

Results

For THAs, ASCs had the lowest 30-day (ASC 1%, HOPD 1.8%, hospital 3.4%, P < .001) and 90-day (ASC 1.7%, HOPD 3.4%, hospital 5.5%, P < .001) readmissions, 30-day ER visits (ASC 1.8%, HOPD 3.5%, hospital 5.3%, P < .001), and fractures (ASC 0.4%, HOPD 0.6%, hospital 1.2%, P < .001). Similar trends were observed for TKAs: 30-day readmissions (ASC 1.3%, HOPD 1.4%, hospital 3.1%, P < .001), 90-day readmissions (ASC 2.2%, HOPD 2.3%, hospital 5.2%, P < .001), and 30-day ER visits (ASC 3%, HOPD 6.5%, hospital 6.4%, P < .001). PJI (THA: P = .1, TKA: P = .6) and dislocation rates (P = .5) were similar across sites.

Conclusions

Patients receiving primary total joint arthroplasty at an ASC had the least postoperative hospital-based care despite similar rates of PJI and dislocation.

Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty in the "Unhealthy": Staying Safe Using Institutional Protocols

BACKGROUND

Recent expansion in the indications for outpatient total joint arthroplasty has led to debates over patient selection. The purpose of this study was to compare early clinical outcomes and complications of same-day discharge (SDD) hip and knee arthroplasties from a high-volume institution based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data were reviewed for all SDD primary joint arthroplasties between January 2013 and August 2023. There were 8 surgeons who performed 7,258 cases at hospital outpatient (n = 4,288) or ambulatory surgery centers (n = 2,970). This included 3,239 total hip arthroplasties, 1,503 total knee arthroplasties, and 2,516 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. The ASA 1 group comprised 506 subjects, compared to 5,005 for ASA 2 and 1,736 for ASA 3. The primary outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, complications, and revisions within 24 hours and 90 days of surgery. The ASA 3 group was older (ASA 1 = 55 versus ASA 2 = 63 versus ASA 3 = 66 years; P < .01) and had a higher body mass index (ASA 1 = 25.4 versus ASA 2 = 28.5 versus ASA 3 = 32.7; P < .01).

RESULTS

There were no differences between ASA groups in joint-related ED visits, readmissions, and complications within 24 h and 90 days of surgery (P > .05). Subjects in the ASA 3 group experienced greater 90-day revisions compared to the other groups (ASA 1 = 1 of 506, 0.2% versus ASA 2 = 15 of 5,005, 0.3% versus ASA 3 = 15 of 1,736, 0.9%; P = .01). Regarding systemic events, ASA 1 subjects experienced significantly greater 24-hour complications (8 of 506, 1.6%) and ED visits (5 of 506, 1.0%), and the ASA 3 subjects had a higher incidence of 90-day readmissions (19 of 1,736, 1.1%) compared to the other groups (P < .05). Within 24 hours of discharge, urinary retention and syncope were the most frequent complications that required additional health care utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Medically optimized patients categorized as ASA 3 can safely undergo SDD hip and knee arthroplasty without increased risk of 24-hour or 90-day complications. Patient preference for outpatient care, reliable social support, and independent functional status are imperative for a successful outpatient program.

Complication rates are not higher after outpatient compared to inpatient fast-track total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched prospective comparative study

PURPOSE

Concerns remain with regards to safety of fast-track (FT) and especially outpatient procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates and clinical outcomes of propensity-matched patients who received FT total hip arthroplasty (THA) in outpatient versus inpatient settings. The hypothesis was that 90-day postoperative complication rates of outpatient FT THA would not be higher than after inpatient FT THA.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of consecutive patients who received FT THA at various rates of outpatient and inpatient surgery by 10 senior surgeons (10 centres). The decision between outpatient and inpatient surgery was made on a case-by-case basis depending on the surgeon and patient. All patients were followed until 90 days after surgery. Complications, readmissions and reoperations were collected, and their severity was assessed according to Clavien-Dindo. Patients completed Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared to inpatient FT THA, patients scheduled for outpatient FT THA had no significant differences in 90-day postoperative complication rates (10.7% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.129). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in 90-day readmission rates and reoperation rates, in severity of postoperative complications, and in time of occurrence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in rates of intraoperative complications, 90-day postoperative complications, readmissions, or reoperations between outpatient and inpatient FT THA. These findings may help hesitant surgeons to move towards outpatient THA pathways as there is no greater risk of early postoperative complications that could be more difficult to manage after discharge.

Trends in the Adoption of Outpatient Joint Arthroplasties and Patient Risk: A Retrospective Analysis of 2019 to 2021 Medicare Claims Data

INTRODUCTION

Total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) have recently been shifting toward outpatient arthroplasty. This study aims to explore recent trends in outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures and examine whether patients with a higher comorbidity burden are undergoing outpatient arthroplasty.

METHODS

Medicare fee-for-service claims were screened for patients who underwent total hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty procedures between January 2019 and December 2022. The procedure was considered to be outpatient if the patient was discharged on the same date of the procedure. The Hierarchical Condition Category Score (HCC) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were used to assess patient comorbidity burden. Patient adverse outcomes included all-cause hospital readmission, mortality, and postoperative complications. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate if higher HCC/CCI scores were associated with adverse patient outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 69,520, 116,411, and 41,922 respective total knee, hip, and shoulder arthroplasties were identified, respectively. Despite earlier removal from the inpatient-only list, outpatient knee and hip surgical volume did not markedly increase until the pandemic started. By 2022Q4, 16%, 23%, and 36% of hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasties were discharged on the same day of surgery, respectively. Both HCC and CCI risk scores in outpatients increased over time ( P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

TJA procedures are shifting toward outpatient surgery over time, largely driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. TJA outpatients' HCC and CCI risk scores increased over this same period, and additional research to determine the effects of this should be pursued.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic retrospective cohort study.

Are We Moving in the Right Direction? Demographic and Outcome Trends in Same-day Total Hip Arthroplasty From 2015 to 2020

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the trends among patients undergoing same-day discharge (SDD) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is imperative to highlight the progression of outpatient surgery and the criteria used for enrollment. The purpose of this study was to identify trends in demographic characteristics and outcomes among patients who participated in an academic hospital SDD THA program over 6 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who enrolled in our institution's SDD THA program from January 2015 to October 2020. Patient demographics, failure-to-launch rate, as well as readmission and revision rates were evaluated. Trends for continuous variables were analyzed using analysis of variance, and categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests.

RESULTS

In total, 1,334 patients participated in our SDD THA program between 2015 and 2020. Age (54.82 to 57.94 years; P < 0.001) and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.15 to 2.90; P < 0.001) significantly differed over the 6-year period. More African Americans (4.3 to 12.3%; P = 0.003) and American Society of Anesthesiology class III (3.2% to 5.8%; P < 0.001) patients enrolled in the program over time. Sex ( P = 0.069), BMI ( P = 0.081), marital status ( P = 0.069), and smoking status ( P = 0.186) did not statistically differ. Although the failure-to-launch rate (0.0% to 12.0%; P < 0.001) increased over time, the 90-day readmissions ( P = 0.204) and 90-day revisions ( P = 0.110) did not statistically differ.

CONCLUSION

More African Americans, older aged individuals, and patients with higher preexisting comorbidity burden enrolled in the program over this period. Our findings are a reflection of a more inclusive selection criterion for participation in the SDD THA program. These results highlight the potential increase in the number of patients and surgeons interested in SDD THA, which is paramount in the current incentivized and value-based healthcare environment.

LEVEL EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective Review.

Predictors of Failure to Achieve Planned Same-Day Discharge after Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: a Multivariable Analysis of Perioperative Risk Factors

INTRODUCTION

Failure to achieve planned same-day discharge (SDD) primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) occurs in as many as 7% to 49% of patients in the United States. This study evaluated the association between 43 perioperative risk factors and SDD failure rates.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 466 primary TJAs with planned SDD to home was performed. Surgeries were performed at an academic tertiary care center comprising a hospital facility and a stand-alone ambulatory surgery center (ASC) on the same campus. Factors associated with failed SDD were identified using a multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Only one of 316 (0.3%) patients who underwent surgery in the ASC failed planned SDD ( P < 0.001) compared with 33.3% of 150 patients who underwent surgery in the hospital. The ASC failure was because of pain that interfered with physical therapy. Sixty-two percent (n = 31) of hospital failures were attributed to medical complications, 24% (n = 12) to physical therapy clearance, 8% (n = 4) to not being seen by internal medicine or therapy on the day of surgery, and 6% (n = 3) to unknown causes. Failure was increased in patients with preoperative anemia ( P = 0.003), nonwhite patients ( P = 0.002), patients taking depression/anxiety medication ( P = 0.015), and for every 10-morphine milligram equivalent increase in opioids consumed per hour in the postacute care unit ( P = 0.030).

DISCUSSION

Risk stratification methods used to allocate patients to ASC versus hospital outpatient TJA surgery predicted SDD success. Most failures were secondary to medical causes. The findings of this study may be used to improve perioperative protocols enabling the safe planning and selection of patients for SDD pathways.

Is There an Implicit Racial Bias in the Case Order of Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

Identifying ways to improve equitable access to healthcare is of the utmost important. In this study, we analyzed whether patient race was negatively associated with surgical start times for total joint arthroplasties (TJA).

METHODS

The surgical case order and start times of all primary TJAs performed at a large academic medical center between May 2014 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if > 21, had a documented self-reported race, and were operated on by an arthroplasty fellowship-trained surgeon. Operations were categorized as first-start, early (7:00 AM-11:00 AM), mid-day (11:00 AM-3:00 PM), or late (after 3:00 PM). Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed, and odds ratios (OR) were calculated.

RESULTS

This study identified 1663 TJAs-871 total knee (TKA) and 792 total hip arthroplasties (THA) who met inclusion criteria. Overall, there was no association between race and surgical start time. Upon sub-analysis by surgical type, this held true for TKA patients, but self-identifying Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients undergoing THA were more likely to have later surgical start times (ORs: 2.08 and 1.88; p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Although there was no association between race and overall TJA surgical start times, patients with marginalized racial and ethnic identities were more likely to undergo elective THA later in the surgical day. Surgeons should be aware of potential implicit bias when determining case order to potentially prevent adverse outcomes due to staff fatigue or lack of proper resources later in the day.

Inconsistent Classification of "Outpatient" Surgeries Leads to Different Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Medicare Beneficiaries: A Critical Analysis

BACKGROUND

With rising utilization of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) in older patients including Medicare beneficiaries, the objective was to compare differences in definition including (1) patient demographics; (2) lengths of stay (LOS); and (3) outcomes of "outpatient" (stated status) versus "same-day discharge" (SDD) (actual LOS = 0 days) utilizing a nationwide database.

METHODS

A national database from 2015 to 2019 was queried for Medicare-aged patients undergoing outpatient THA. Total outpatient THAs (N = 6,072) were defined in one of 2 ways: either "outpatient" by the hospital (N = 2,003) or LOS = 0 days (N = 4,069). Demographics, LOS, discharge destinations, and complications were compared between groups. Logistic regression models computed odds ratios (ORs) for factors leading to complications, readmissions, and nonhome discharges. P values < .008 were significant.

RESULTS

Women (OR: 1.19, P = .002), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.31, P = .003), general anesthesia (OR: 1.24, P = .001), and longer operative times (≥95 minutes) (OR: 1.82, P < .001) were associated with 'outpatient' designation versus SDD. Within the hospital-defined 'outpatient' cohort, 49.1% (983 of 2,003) were discharged the same day (LOS = 0 days), and 21.8% had LOS 2 or more days. The hospital-defined 'outpatient' cohort had greater odds of nonhome discharges (6.3 versus 2.8%; OR: 1.88, P < .001) compared to SDD surgeries. The incidence was higher for any complication among hospital-defined 'outpatient' designated patients compared to SDD (5.5 versus 3.9%, P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient surgeries may be misleading and often do not correlate with SDD, as over 20% remain in the hospital 2 or more days. Investigators should quantitatively define the "outpatient" status by actual LOS to allow standardization and results comparison.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty From a Stand-Alone Surgery Center: Safe as the Hospital?

BACKGROUND

Literature suggests that outpatient arthroplasty may result in low rates of complications and readmissions. There is, however, a dearth of information on the relative safety of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed at stand-alone ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) versus hospital outpatient (HOP) settings. We aimed to compare safety profiles and 90-day adverse events of these 2 cohorts.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data were reviewed on all patients who underwent outpatient TKA from 2015 to 2022. The ASC and HOP groups were compared, and differences in demographics, complications, reoperations, revisions, readmissions, and emergency department (ED) visits within 90 days of surgery were analyzed. There were 4 surgeons who performed 4,307 TKAs during the study period, including 740 outpatient cases (ASC = 157; HOP = 583). The ASC patients were younger than HOP patients (ASC = 61 versus HOP = 65; P < .001). Body mass index and sex did not differ significantly between groups.

RESULTS

Within 90 days, 44 (6%) complications occurred. No differences were observed between groups in rates of 90-day complications (ASC = 9 of 157, 5.7% versus HOP = 35 of 583, 6.0%; P = .899), reoperations (ASC = 2 of 157, 1.3% versus HOP = 3 of 583, 0.5%; P = .303), revisions (ASC = 0 of 157 versus HOP = 3 of 583, 0.5%; P = 1), readmissions (ASC = 3 of 157, 1.9% versus HOP = 8 of 583, 1.4%; P = .625), and ED visits (ASC = 1 of 157, 0.6% versus HOP = 3 of 583, 0.5%; P = .853).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that in appropriately selected patients, outpatient TKA can be safely performed in both ASC and HOP settings with similar low rates of 90-day complications, reoperations, revisions, readmissions, and ED visits.

The Differential Effect of COVID on Total Joint Arthroplasty Between Hospital and Ambulatory Surgery Centers/Hospital Outpatient Departments: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Analysis

Background

Coronavirus disease (COVID) created unprecedented challenges, especially for high-volume elective subspecialties like total joint arthroplasty. Limited inpatient capacity and resource conservation led to new outpatient selection criteria and site of service changes. As a Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Quality Collaborative Initiative quality project, demographic changes, complications, and differential effects on inpatient vs outpatient centers pre- and post-COVID were analyzed.

Methods

The registry identified all total joint arthroplasty at hospitals and ASCs/HOPDs between 07/2019-12/2019 and 07/2020-12/2020. These intervals represented pre-COVID and post-COVID elective surgery shutdowns. Case volumes, demographics, and 90-day complications were compared.

Results

Comparing 2020 to 2019, hospital volumes decreased (-9% total hip arthroplasty [THA], -17% total knee arthroplasty [TKA]), and ambulatory surgery center (ASC)/hospital outpatient department (HOPD) increased (+84% THA, +125% TKA). Entering 2020, ASC/HOPD patients were older (P = .0031, P < .0001: THA, TKA), had more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 (P = .0105, P = .0021), fewer attended joint class (P < .0001, P < .0001), and more hips were women (P = .023). Hospital patients had higher preoperative pain scores (P = .0117, P < .0001; THA, TKA), less joint education attendance (P < .0001, P < .0001), younger TKAs (P = .0169), and more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 (0.0009). After propensity matching, there were no significant differences between site of service for 90-day fractures, deep vein thromboses or pulmonary embolisms, infection, or hip dislocations. Hospital THAs had higher readmissions (P = .0003) and TKAs had higher 30-day emergency department visits (P = .005). ASC/HOPD patients were prescribed higher oral morphine equivalents (P < .0001, P < .0001; THA, TKA).

Conclusions

COVID's elective surgery shutdown caused a dramatic site of service shift. Traditional preoperative education was negatively impacted, and older and sicker patients became outpatients. But short-term complications were not increased in ASCs/HOPDs. These site of service and associated patient demographic changes may be safely sustained.

Risk Factors for Prolonged Hospital Stay After Femoral Neck Fracture

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between pre-operative anemia and prolonged hospital stay among geriatric patients with operative femoral neck fractures. This retrospective cohort study was performed at a level I trauma center and included geriatric patients with femoral neck fractures (OTA/AO 31) and operative treatment with Current Procedural Terminology code 27236. Exclusion criteria were admission to the intensive care unit, evacuation of subdural hematoma, and conditions requiring exploratory laparotomy. A total of 207 individuals, with data collected between January 2015 and August 2019 and age 65 years and older, were included in the analysis. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between anemia and length of stay adjusting for potential confounders. Anemia was defined using preoperative hematocrit. The primary outcome was prolonged length of stay, defined as 5 or more days. The group was 65% women. The mean age was 80.2 years (range, 64-98 years). The majority (61%) of patients had anemia. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification was associated with preoperative anemia (P=.02). Patients with anemia had a 16% higher risk of prolonged length of stay compared with patients without anemia (81% vs 65%, P=.009). In the linear regression model, preoperative hematocrit was associated with length of stay (P=.032) when adjusted for sex, age, preoperative tranexamic acid, preoperative hemoglobin, postoperative hemoglobin, and postoperative hematocrit. Length of stay was approximately 1 week in this study, with anemia being a statistically significant risk factor for prolonged length of stay. Health care providers and administrators can consider anemia on admission when predicting length of stay. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):211-217.].

The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) Score Predicts Discharge Destination, Length of Stay, and Postoperative Mobility after Total Joint Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Predicting an arthroplasty patient's discharge disposition, length of stay, and physical function is helpful because it allows for preoperative patient optimization, expectation management, and discharge planning. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) score to predict discharge destination, length of stay, and postoperative mobility in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Primary unilateral TKAs (n=9,064) and THAs (n=8,649) performed for primary osteoarthritis at our institution from 2018 to 2021 (excluding March to June 2020) were identified using a prospectively maintained institutional registry. We evaluated the associations between preoperative RAPT score and (1) discharge destination, (2) length of stay, and postoperative mobility as measured by (3) successful ambulation on the day of surgery and (4) Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-Clicks" score.

RESULTS

On multivariable analyses adjusting for multiple covariates, every one-point increase in RAPT score among TKA patients was associated with a 1.82-fold increased odds of home discharge (P<0.001), 0.22 days shorter length of stay (P<0.001), 1.13-fold increased odds of ambulating on postoperative day 0 (P<0.001), and 0.25-point higher AM-PAC score (P<0.001). Similar findings were seen among THAs. A RAPT score of 8 or higher was the most sensitive and specific cutoff to predict home discharge.

CONCLUSION

Among nearly 18,000 TKA and THA patients, RAPT score was predictive of discharge disposition, length of stay, and postoperative mobility. A RAPT score of 8 or higher was the most sensitive and specific cutoff to predict discharge to home. In contrast to prior studies of the RAPT score which have grouped TKAs and THAs together, this study ran separate analyses for TKAs and THAs and found that THA patients seemed to perform better than TKA patients with equal RAPT scores, suggesting that RAPT may behave differently between TKAs and THAs, particularly in the intermediate risk RAPT range.

Is an "Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment Score" Needed for Predicting Safe Selection of Outpatient Arthroplasty Candidates?

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty is rapidly shifting to the outpatient space. One of the challenges of same-day discharge adoption has been determining which patients are suitable candidates. Risk assessment tools have been developed, including the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score. The purpose of this study was to assess its predictive utility.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all total joint arthroplasties performed at a single ambulatory surgery center in 2018, yielding a cohort of 1,105 patients (1,332 arthroplasties). The institution's outpatient criteria required optimization of all medical conditions; if the patient had no failing organ, they were candidates for same-day discharge. OARA scores were calculated based on preoperative histories and physical examinations. Analyses were performed on the statistical utility of the OARA score in predicting successful same-day discharge. The mean age was 59 years (range, 27-82), the mean body mass index was 33.3 kg/m² (range, 16-66), and 51.5% were women. A total of 45% of patients had one or more major comorbidity.

RESULTS

There were 81.6% of patients who had an acceptable OARA score (<60). In addition, 97% of patients who had an "unacceptable" OARA score were successfully discharged the same day. There were 23 patients who required inpatient observation; of these, 7 (30.4%) had an OARA score ≥60.

CONCLUSION

The OARA score was accurate in predicting patients who successfully had same-day discharge but poor at predicting who would not. This system is time consuming and may be too restrictive on which patients are candidates for outpatient arthroplasty. Surgeons may consider a more simplified criteria for outpatient arthroplasty.

Institution of same-day total joint replacement at an urban safety net hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Increasingly, total hip and total knee replacements are being performed at outpatient ambulatory surgery centers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of instituting a same-day surgery program for hip and knee replacement at an urban, safety net hospital.

Methods

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected registry for all patients scheduled for same-day total joint replacement at a safety net hospital was performed. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, same-day hospital admissions, and 30-day emergency room/hospital admissions.

Results

131 same-day total joint replacements were identified, including 76 knees and 55 hips. Median ASA was 3, and median Charlson comorbidity score was 2. Rate of same-day surgery for total joint replacements increased from 4.5% in September 2020 to 100% in September 2021. On major patient outcomes, 3.8% of patients (n = 5) required conversion to inpatient admission. Rate of 30-Day Emergency Department (ED) visits was 13.0% (n = 17). Most common complaints included postoperative pain (n = 10), incision drainage/edema/hematoma (n = 9), and cellulitis (n = 2). 30-Day Hospital Readmissions occurred in 1.5% of patients (n = 2).

Conclusion

Same-day hip and knee replacement can be performed safely at a safety net hospital. Unlike dedicated high-volume orthopedic hospitals or outpatient surgery centers, urban safety net hospitals face a different set of challenges and must care for a wide variety of patients who do not plan for their illness and/or may not be able to pay for their care. Outpatient total joint replacement may extend total joint replacement to patients who might not have access otherwise.

ON Path: outpatient nonunion pathway for lower-extremity nonunions

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of outpatient and short-stay surgical nonunion treatment by incorporating minimally invasive surgical techniques, multimodal pain control, and a modernized postoperative protocol.

Design

Retrospective case series.

Setting

Tertiary referral hospital and hospital outpatient department.

Patients

All consecutive nonunion surgeries performed by 1 surgeon between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Outpatient and short-stay surgeries for patients with nonunion of the tibia and femur were eligible (n = 50).

Intervention

Outpatient and short-stay surgical nonunion treatment by incorporating minimally invasive surgical techniques, multimodal pain control, and a modernized postoperative protocol.

Main Outcome Measurements

Length of stay, postoperative emergency department visits, all complications, reoperations, and time to union.

Results

Fifty patients were eligible, with 32 male patients (64%) and an average age of 46.5 years. The patient cohort consisted of 28 femur (56%) and 22 tibia (44%) nonunions. The average length of stay was 0.36 days. Seven patients (14%) required reoperation, 6 patients because of deep infection and 1 patient because of painful implant removal. Four patients (8%) presented to the emergency department within 1 week of surgery. One patient requiring amputation and patients lost to follow-up were excluded from the union rate calculation. For the remaining patients (46/50), 100% (46/46) united their nonunion. The average time to radiographic union was 7.82 months.

Conclusions

An outpatient pathway is safe and effective for medically appropriate patients undergoing nonunion surgery. Outpatient nonunion surgery is a reasonable alternative that achieves similar outcomes compared with inpatient nonunion studies in the published literature.

Level of Evidence

IV.

Same-Day Discharge Following Aseptic Revision and Conversion Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Single-Institution Experience

Background

With hospital inpatient capacity increasingly limited and primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) rapidly transitioning to outpatient settings, the feasibility of outpatient aseptic revision and conversion TJA (rTJA) has been considered. Before the widespread adoption of outpatient rTJA, guidelines must be established to prevent patient harm. To this end, this study describes our initial experience with same-day-discharge (SDD) aseptic rTJA.

Methods

All aseptic rTJAs performed between May 8, 2015, and December 30, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Revision indications, patient selection criteria, and outcomes including SDD success rate, predischarge complications, all-cause emergency department visits, inpatient readmissions, and unplanned clinic encounters within 90 days of surgery were recorded.

Results

Thirty-five SDD aseptic rTJAs were performed. Conversion total hip arthroplasty (55.0%) and instability (27.3%) were the most common indications for hip revision. Instability (50%) and conversion total knee arthroplasty (20.8%) were most common for knee revision. SDD was achieved in 97% (34/35) of cases. One hip patient failed SDD due to persistent hypoxia requiring an overnight hospital stay and also underwent closed reduction for dislocation in the emergency department within 90 days of discharge. Two additional patients had unplanned clinic encounters within 90 days of the index procedure. There were no hospital readmissions or reoperations within 90 days.

Conclusions

Our initial experience suggests SDD aseptic rTJA can be safe and effective when modern perioperative outpatient protocols and surgical techniques are implemented. Future studies should further define patient selection criteria to optimize outcomes and minimize complications in this population.

A Formal Same-Day Discharge Total Joint Arthroplasty Program May Not Be Necessary: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) programs often have stringent selection criteria. Some patients deemed ineligible may nonetheless be discharged on the day of surgery. This study compares the outcomes between patients enrolled in our SDD TJA program who were SDD to those who did not participate in the program but were also SDD.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who were SDD following TJA from 2015 to 2020. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on whether they were formally enrolled in our institution's SDD TJA program. Propensity-score matching was performed to limit confounding and independent sample t-tests or Pearson's chi-squared tests were used to compare outcomes of interest between the matched groups.

RESULTS

Of the 1778 patients included, 1384 (78%) completed the SDD TJA program and 394 (22%) were SDD but did not participate in the SDD TJA program. Upon 1:1 propensity-score matching, a total of 550 patients were matched for comparison. The surgical time was significantly longer for patients who did not participate in the SDD TJA program compared to those who participated in the program (109.39 vs 87.29 minutes; P < .001). Discharge disposition (P = .999), 90-day emergency department visits (P = .476), 90-day all-cause readmissions (P = .999), 90-day all-cause revisions (P = .563), and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement at all time points did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSION

Enrollment in a formal SDD TJA program may not be a necessary precursor to achieving similar outcomes following TJA for patients who are SDD without formally enrolling. Therefore, a formal program may no longer be needed at an institution with well-established evidence-based protocols with strong success and an experience with value-based care.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Safety and efficacy of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of outpatient joint arthroplasty (OJA) pathways compared to inpatient pathways.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted to identify eligible studies. Studies comparing OJA with inpatient pathways-following hip and/or (partial) knee arthroplasty-were included. Included studies were assigned-based on OJA definition-to one of the following two groups: (1) outpatient surgery (OS); outpatient defined as discharge on the same day as surgery; and (2) semi-outpatient surgery (SOS); outpatient defined as discharge within 24 h after surgery with or without an overnight stay. Methodological quality was assessed. Outcomes included (serious) adverse events ((S)AEs), readmissions, successful same-day discharge rates, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and costs. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses by type of arthroplasty were performed when deemed appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies (OS = 26, SOS = 15) met the inclusion criteria. One RCT and 40 observational studies were included, with an overall risk-of-bias of moderate to high. Forty studies were included in the meta-analysis. Outpatients (both OS and SOS) were younger and had a lower BMI and ASA class compared to inpatients. Overall, no significant differences between outpatients and inpatients were found for overall complications and readmission rates, and improvement in PROMs. By type of arthroplasty, only THAs in OS pathways were associated with fewer AEs [OR = 0.55 (0.41-0.74)] compared to inpatient pathways. 92% of OS patients were discharged on the day of surgery. OJA resulted in an average cost reduction of $6.797,02.

CONCLUSION

OJA pathways are as safe and effective as inpatient pathways in selected populations, with a potential reduction of costs. Considerable risk of bias in the majority of studies emphasizes the need for further research.

Length of stay in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Background

Minimizing costs associated with the care of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can reduce the burden on health systems that regularly struggle with limited resources. Predicting and reducing TKA associated length of stay (LoS) can therefore be invaluable. This study aimed to determine the factors that impact LoS in patients undergoing TKA and propose a model design to predict LoS.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing TKA in a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients who underwent TKA from March 2007 to March 2021 were included in the study. Data were extracted from available electronic and paper records. Variables evaluated included: patients' demographic data, general admission data, laboratory data, transfusion, operation data, and preoperative comorbidities and medical history. Independent T-test, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation were used for univariate data analysis. For multivariate analysis and model designing, multiple regression stepwise methods were used.

Results

878 patients were included in this study. Mean LoS was 6.09 (SD = 1.83) with a median of 6 days. Factors found to have a significant effect on length of stay were age, revision surgery, Anesthesia type, intensive care unit admission, insurance, transfusion, preoperative hemoglobin level, and pre-operative platelet (Plt) count. Applying a multiple regression stepwise model to these variables showed that the following pre-operative factors can be predictive for LoS: revision surgery, sex, medical insurance, hemoglobin level, and Plt count.

Conclusions

It was deduced that sex, revision, pre-operative hemoglobin and Plt level and health insurance were the best predictors for LoS in patients undergoing TKA.

Failure to Meet Same-Day Discharge is Not a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

As more centers introduce same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) programs, it is vital to understand the factors associated with successful outpatient TJA and whether outcomes vary for those that failed SDD. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of patients that are successfully discharged home the day of surgery to those that fail-to-launch (FTL) and require a longer in-hospital stay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who enrolled in our institution's SDD TJA program from 2015 to 2020. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on whether they were successfully SDD or FTL. Outcomes of interest included discharge disposition, 90-day readmissions, 90-day revisions, surgical time, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as assessed by the FJS-12 (3 months, 1 year, and 2 years), HOOS, JR, and KOOS, JR (preoperatively, 3 months, and 1 year). Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Outcomes were compared using multilinear regressions, controlling for demographic differences.

RESULTS

A total of 1491 patients were included. Of these, 1384 (93%) were successfully SDD while 107 (7%) FTL and required a longer length-of-stay. Patients who FTL were more likely to be non-married (p = 0.007) and ASA class III (p = 0.017) compared to those who were successfully SDD. Surgical time was significantly longer for those who FTL compared to those who were successfully SDD (100.86 vs. 83.42 min; p < 0.001). Discharge disposition (p = 0.100), 90-day readmissions (p = 0.897), 90-day revisions (p = 0.997), and all PROM scores both preoperatively and postoperatively did not significantly differ between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the notion that FTL is not a predictor of adverse outcomes as patients who FTL achieved similar outcomes as those who were successfully SDD. The findings of this study can aid orthopedic surgeons to educate their patients who wish to participate in a similar program, as well as patients that have concerns after they failed to go home on the day of surgery.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Relative Contribution of Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment Score Medical Comorbidities to Same-Day Discharge After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Selection of patients who can safely undergo outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an increasing priority given the growth of ambulatory TJA. This study quantified the relative contribution and weight of 52 medical comorbidities comprising the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score as predictors of safe same-day discharge (SDD).

METHODS

The medical records of 2748 primary TJAs consecutively performed between 2014 and 2020 were reviewed to record the presence or absence of medical comorbidities in the OARA score. After controlling for patients not offered SDD due to OARA scores and patients who were offered but declined SDD, the final analysis sample consisted of 631 cases, 92.1% of whom achieved SDD and 7.9% of whom did not achieve SDD. Odds ratios were calculated to quantify the extent to which each comorbidity is associated with achieving SDD.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics of analysis cases were consistent with a high-volume TJA practice in a US metropolitan area. Among testable OARA comorbidities, 53% significantly decreased the likelihood of SDD by 2.3 (body mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m²) to 12 (history of post-operative confusion and pacemaker dependence) times. BMI between 30 and 39 kg/m² did not affect the likelihood of SDD (P = .960), and BMI ≥40 kg/m² had the smallest odds ratio in our study (2.28, 95% confidence interval 1.11-4.67, P = .025).

CONCLUSION

Study findings contribute to the refinement of the OARA score as a successful predictor of safe SDD following primary TJA while maintaining low 90-day readmission rates.

Recent Increases in Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Have Not Increased Early Complications

BACKGROUND

Outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased in recent years. Recent regulatory changes may allow and incentivize outpatient THA in more patients; however, there are concerns regarding safety. The purpose of this study is to assess early complications in outpatient THA compared to longer hospitalization.

METHODS

We identified patients undergoing primary THA in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2015 and 2018. Patients were stratified by length of stay (LOS): 0 days (LOS 0), 1-2 days, and ≥3 days. Thirty-day rates of any complication, wound complications, readmissions, and reoperation were assessed. Multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 4813 (4%) patients underwent outpatient THA, 84,627 (64%) had LOS of 1-2 days, and 42,293 (32%) had LOS ≥3 days. LOS 0 patients were younger, had lower body mass index, and less medical comorbidities compared to those with postsurgical hospitalization. Any complication was experienced in 3.2% of the LOS 0 group, 5.3% of the LOS 1-2 group, and 15.6% for the LOS ≥3 group (P < .0001). Readmission rates were 1.6%, 2.6%, and 4.7% for the 3 groups, respectively (P < .0001). After controlling for confounding variables, patients with LOS 1-2 days had higher odds for any complication (odds ratio 1.56 [1.32-1.83) and readmission (odds ratio 1.41 [1.12-1.78]) compared to LOS 0 days. Patients with LOS ≥3 days had higher odds for complications compared to LOS 0 or 1-2 days.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient THA had lower odds for readmission or complications compared to LOS 1-2 days. Despite increased outpatient surgery, many patients had postsurgical hospitalization and, due to patient factors, this remains an integral patient of post-THA care.

Determining the validity of the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) tool for identifying patients for safe same-day discharge after primary shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Early discharge has been a target of cost-control efforts given the growing demand for joint replacement surgery. The Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score, a medically based risk-assessment score, has shown high predictive ability in achieving safe early discharge following outpatient lower-extremity arthroplasty using a score threshold initially set at ≤59 points but more recently adapted to ≤79 points. However, no study has been performed using the OARA tool for shoulder replacement, which has been shown to have lower associated medical risks than lower-extremity arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine the OARA score threshold for same-day discharge (SDD) following shoulder arthroplasty and evaluate its effectiveness in selecting patients for SDD. We hypothesized that the OARA score threshold for shoulder arthroplasty would be higher than that for lower-extremity arthroplasty.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 422 patients who underwent primary anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty between April 2018 and October 2019 performed by a single surgeon. As standard practice, all patients were counseled preoperatively regarding SDD and given the choice to stay overnight. Medical history, length of stay, and 90-day readmissions were obtained from medical records. Analysis of variance testing and screening test characteristics compared the performance of the OARA score vs. the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) class and a previously published OARA score threshold used to define a low risk of outpatient lower-extremity arthroplasty.

RESULTS

A preoperative OARA score cutoff of ≤110 points demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.0% for identifying patients with SDD after shoulder arthroplasty, compared with 66.7% using the hip and knee OARA score threshold of ≤59 points (P < .0001) and 80.4% using ASA-PS class ≤ 2 (P = .008). OARA scores ≤ 110 points also showed a negative predictive value of 98.9% and a false-negative rate of 2.0% but remained incomprehensive with a specificity of 24.0% (P < .0001). Analysis of variance demonstrated that mean OARA scores increased significantly with length of stay (P = .001) compared with ASA-PS classes (P = .82). Patients with OARA scores ≤ 110 points were also 2.5 times less likely to have 90-day emergency department visits (P = .04) than those with OARA scores > 110 points. There was no difference in 30- and 90-day readmission rates for patients with OARA scores ≤ 59 points, OARA scores ≤ 110 points, and ASA-PS classes ≤ 2.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that a preoperative OARA score threshold of ≤110 points is effective and conservative in screening patients for SDD following shoulder arthroplasty, with low rates of 90-day emergency department visits and readmissions. This threshold is a useful screening tool to identify patients who are not good candidates for SDD.

Readmission, Complication, and Disposition Calculators in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systemic Review

BACKGROUND

Predictive tools are useful adjuncts in surgical planning. They help guide patient selection, candidacy for inpatient vs outpatient surgery, and discharge disposition as well as predict the probability of readmissions and complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Surgeons may find it difficult due to significant variation among risk calculators to decide which tool is best suited for a specific patient for optimal decision-based care. Our aim is to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine the existing post-TJA readmission calculators and compare the specific elements that comprise their formula. Second, we intend to evaluate the pros and cons of each calculator.

METHODS

Using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols protocol, we conducted a systematic search through 3 major databases for publications addressing TJA risk stratification tools for readmission, discharge disposition, and early complications. We excluded those manuscripts that were not comprehensive for hips and knees, did not list discharge, readmission or complication as the primary outcome, or were published outside the North America.

RESULTS

Ten publications met our criteria and were compared on their sourced data, variable types, and overall algorithm quality. Seven of these were generated with single institution data and 3 from large administrative datasets. Three tools determined readmission risk, 5 calculated discharge disposition, and 2 predicted early complications. Only 4 prediction tools were validated by external studies. Seven studies utilized preoperative data points in their risk equations while 3 utilized intraoperative or postsurgical data to delineate risk.

CONCLUSION

The extensive variation among TJA risk calculators underscores the need for tools with more individualized stratification capabilities and verification. The transition to outpatient and same-day discharge TJA may preclude or change the need for many of these calculators. Further studies are needed to develop more streamlined risk calculator tools that predict readmission and surgical complications.

The feasibility of outpatient conversion and revision hip arthroplasty in selected patients

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues moving to the outpatient arena, and may be feasible for some conversion and revision scenarios. Controversy surrounds appropriate patient selection. The purpose of this study is to report complications associated with outpatient revision and conversion THA, and to determine if comorbidities are associated with complications or overnight stay.

METHODS

From June 2013 through August 2018, 46 patients (47 hips) underwent conversion (n = 10) or revision (n = 37) THA at a free-standing ambulatory surgery centre. This represented only 6.3% of revision THA cases at our institution during the study period that were selected for outpatient surgery. Mean patient age was 58.0 years, and 52% of patients were males. 1 or more major comorbidities were present in 15 patients (32%) including 1 valvular disease, 7 arrhythmia, 2 thromboembolism history, 3 obstructive sleep apnoea, 3 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2 asthma, 4 frequent urination, and 1 renal disease.

RESULTS

44 (94%) patients were discharged same day without incident, none required transfer to acute facility, and 3 stayed overnight (2 convenience, 1 for medical reasons - urinary retention). The patient kept overnight for medical reasons had no major comorbidities. 3 patients were placed on an extended course of antibiotics, including 2 with positive intraoperative cultures and 1 for cellulitis. There were no major complications, readmissions, or subsequent surgeries within 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient revision hip arthroplasty is safe in selected patients undergoing minor or partial revisions. Presence of medical comorbidities was not associated with risk of complications. Medical optimisation and a multimodal programme to mitigate risk of blood loss and reduce narcotic need facilitate the safe performance of arthroplasty in an outpatient setting.

Defining Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The term "outpatient" has a variety of meanings regarding the location of arthroplasty and the duration of stay postoperatively. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature and more accurately define the term "outpatient."

METHODS

A PubMed search (2014 to 2019) using the terms "outpatient AND arthroplasty" identified 76 studies; 35 studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed to determine the definition of "outpatient." The level of evidence, type of arthroplasty, location of surgery (hospital or ambulatory surgery center [ASC]), approach used for hip arthroplasty, number of patients, number of surgeons, and length of time the patients were kept at the location after surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

Arthroplasties analyzed were total hip (11), total knee (seven), unicompartmental knee (five), and hip and knee (12). Only 16.8% of surgeries defined as outpatient hip or knee arthroplasty were done in a freestanding ASC, and 44.2% of patients defined as outpatients were kept overnight for the 23-hour observation.

DISCUSSION

We propose "DASH" (Discharge from ASC to Home) as a new term to define arthroplasties done in an outpatient setting with the patient discharged home the same day.

Influence of day of surgery and prediction of LOS > 2 days after fast-track hip and knee replacement

Background and purpose - Enhanced recovery programs have reduced length of stay (LOS) after hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Although risk factors disposing to prolonged LOS are well documented, there is limited information on the role of weekday of surgery. This study analyzed the role of weekday of surgery and other potential risk factors for LOS > 2 days.Patients and methods - We included 10,576 unselected consecutive procedures between January 2016 and August 2017 within a multicenter fast-track THA/TKA collaboration with prospective collection of preoperative characteristics. We used multiple regression analysis of potential risk factors for LOS > 2 days followed by construction of a simple risk score from 0 to 15 points based on the calculated odds ratios.Results - Mean LOS was 1.9 (SD 1.8) days, with 80% of patients having surgery from Monday to Wednesday. Of these, 17% (95% CI 16-18) had a LOS > 2 days vs. 19% (CI 17-21) in those operated on Thursday and Friday. Patients were scheduled evenly throughout the week regardless of risk of LOS > 2 days and despite the fact that 38% (CI 35-40) of patients with ≥ 6 points (16% of the total population) had a LOS > 2 days compared with 14% (CI 13-14) in those with < 6 points. In these "high-risk" patients, the fraction with LOS > 2 days increased when having surgery on Thursdays or Fridays (43% CI 38-49) compared with Monday to Wednesday (37% CI 34-39).Interpretation - A detailed preoperative risk assessment may be helpful to plan the weekday of surgery in order to decrease LOS and weekend hospitalization.

Can an outpatient risk assessment tool predict who needs postoperative haemoglobin monitoring?

AIMS

Recent improvements in surgical technique and perioperative blood management after total joint replacement (TJR) have decreased rates of transfusion. However, as many surgeons transition to outpatient TJR, obtaining routine postoperative blood tests becomes more challenging. Therefore, we sought to determine if a preoperative outpatient assessment tool that stratifies patients based on numerous medical comorbidities could predict who required postoperative haemoglobin (Hb) measurement.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of consecutive unilateral primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed at a single institution. Prospectively collected data included preoperative and postoperative Hb levels, need for blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score.

RESULTS

A total of 504 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age at time of arthroplasty was 65.3 years (SD 10.2). Of the patients, 216 (42.9%) were THAs and 288 (57.1%) were TKAs. Six patients required a blood transfusion postoperatively (1.19%). Transfusion after surgery was associated with lower postoperative day 1 Hb (median of 8.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 7.9 to 8.6) vs 11.3 (IQR 10.4 to 12.2); p < 0.001), longer length of stay (1 day (IQR 1 to 1) vs 2 days (IQR 2 to 3); p < 0.001), higher OARA score (median of 60.0 (IQR 40 to 75) vs 5.0 (IQR 0-35); p = 0.001), and total hip arthroplasty (p < 0.001). All patients who received a transfusion had an OARA score > 34; however, this did not reach statistical significance as a screening threshold.

CONCLUSION

Risk of blood transfusion after primary TJR was uncommon in our series, with an incidence of 1.19%. Transfusion was associated with OARA scores > 60. The OARA score, not American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, reliably identified patients at risk for postoperative blood transfusion. Selective Hb monitoring may result in substantial cost savings in the era of cost containment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):65-70.

Compilation and Analysis of Web-Based Orthopedic Personalized Predictive Tools: A Scoping Review

Web-based personalized predictive tools in orthopedic surgery are becoming more widely available. Despite rising numbers of these tools, many orthopedic surgeons may not know what tools are available, how these tools were developed, and how they can be utilized. The aim of this scoping review is to compile and synthesize the profile of existing web-based orthopedic tools. We conducted two separate PubMed searches-one a broad search and the second a more targeted one involving high impact journals-with the aim of comprehensively identifying all existing tools. These articles were then screened for functional tool URLs, methods regarding the tool's creation, and general inputs and outputs required for the tool to function. We identified 57 articles, which yielded 31 unique web-based tools. These tools involved various orthopedic conditions (e.g., fractures, osteoarthritis, musculoskeletal neoplasias); interventions (e.g., fracture fixation, total joint arthroplasty); outcomes (e.g., mortality, clinical outcomes). This scoping review highlights the availability and utility of a vast array of web-based personalized predictive tools for orthopedic surgeons. Increased awareness and access to these tools may allow for better decision support, surgical planning, post-operative expectation management, and improved shared decision-making.

Impact of Morbid Obesity on Overnight Stay and Early Complications With Outpatient Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The shift toward outpatient joint arthroplasty is rapidly growing, but concerns still remain on whether certain patients should be excluded from same-day discharge arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether morbid obesity is a risk factor for perioperative complications after outpatient joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed from 2013 to 2017 of all outpatient primary total hip, total knee, partial knee, and revision hip and knee arthroplasties, yielding a cohort of 4863 patients (5988 arthroplasty procedures). Patients were separated and analyzed based on 2 groups: nonmorbidly obese (NMO) (BMI < 40 kg/m²) and morbidly obese (MO) (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²). The NMO group consisted of 4870 arthroplasties and the MO group consisted of 1118 arthroplasties. Overnight stays, medical complications, and early perioperative complications were assessed between groups.

RESULTS

Overnight stays occurred in 5.4% of NMO patients and 9.1% of MO patients (P < .001), with medical reasons for the overnight stay occurring in 3.2% of NMO and 6.4% of MO patients (P < .001). Respiratory/sleep apnea was the leading medical reason leading to overnight stay occurring in 4% of MO patients and 0.8% of NMO patients (P < .001). There was no significant difference between groups in direct facility transfers, emergency room visits/admissions, or medical complications within 90 days. Wound revisions, nonrevision surgery, or revisions within 90 days were significant between groups.

CONCLUSION

MO patients did not have an increased risk of 90-day medical complications, readmission, or revisions after outpatient arthroplasty. However, MO patients did have a significantly higher incidence of overnight stay.

Resource Reallocation during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Suburban Hospital System: Implications for Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

The COVID pandemic of 2020 has emerged as a global threat to patients, health care providers, and to the global economy. Owing to this particular novel and highly infectious strain of coronavirus, the rapid community spread and clinical severity of the subsequent respiratory syndrome created a substantial strain on hospitals and health care systems around the world. The rapid surge of patients presenting over a small period for emergent clinical care, admission to the hospital, and intensive care units with many requiring mechanically assisted ventilators for respiratory support demonstrated the potential to overwhelm health care workers, hospitals, and health care systems. The purpose of this article is to describe an effective system for redeployment of health care supplies, resources, and personnel to hospitals within a suburban academic hospital system to optimize the care of COVID patients, while treating orthopedic patients in an equally ideal setting to maximize their surgical and clinical care. This article will provide a particular focus on the current and future role of a specialty hip and knee hospital and its partnering ambulatory surgery center in the context of an outpatient arthroplasty program.

Same-Day Discharge Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: Examining Trends, Discharge Dispositions, and Complications Over Time

Administrative database studies have reported on the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA); however, most patient cohorts have been defined by length of stay (LOS), and the proportion discharged directly home remains unknown. The purpose of this investigation was to (1) determine common dispositions for patients undergoing SDD TJA; (2) understand changes in discharge disposition over time; and (3) determine the safety of SDD TJA, stratified by discharge disposition. The PearlDiver Database was reviewed for patients who underwent SDD TJA (LOS of 0 days) from 2011 to 2016. Patients were stratified by discharge disposition, and rates and complications following SDD TJA were assessed accordingly. Chi-square analysis was performed to compare demographics and complications between patient groups stratified by disposition. From 2011 to 2016, there was an exponential increase in the annual rate of SDD TJA from 0.95% to 20.5%, respectively; however, the annual proportion of patients discharged directly home remained unchanged (approximately 68%), with the remaining discharged directly to an alternate care facility, most commonly inpatient rehabilitation. Patients discharged to an alternate facility were significantly older (P<.001), had significantly higher comorbidity scores (P<.001), and had significantly more complications (P<.001) than those patients discharged directly home. Although the annual rate of SDD TJA is increasing, up to one-third of patients are not discharged directly home-a proportion unchanged over time. Moving forward, administrative database studies examining SDD TJA must account for discharge disposition; moreover, there is a need to understand the practice of SDD TJA to an alternate care facility. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):204-208.].

After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Returning to Normalcy or Returning to a New Normal?

The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), pandemic has delivered a profound and negative impact on the United States. The suspension of elective surgeries including arthroplasty will have a lasting effect on all stakeholders including patients, physicians, and healthcare organizations within the US healthcare system. Resumption of elective hip and knee arthroplasty will need to be carefully focused. The purpose of this work is to address potential strategies, concerns, and regulatory barriers in restarting elective hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Low complication rates in outpatient total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study is to report the incidence of complications associated with outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondarily, 2-year minimum outcomes are reported.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2016, 928 patients underwent 1143 outpatient TKAs with the Vanguard Complete Knee System (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN). Patients were selected for outpatient surgery if they were medically optimized without a failing organ system and had sufficient support at home. Overnight stays, medical complications and early perioperative complications were assessed in this entire cohort. Two-year minimum follow-up was available on 793 patients (978 knees). Patient records were analyzed for outcome measures and revisions.

RESULTS

In 124 procedures, the patient stayed overnight for 23-h observation. Thirty-seven (3.2%) were for convenience reasons and 87 (7.6%) for medical observation. Heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were associated with increased risk of overnight stay. Excluding manipulations, reoperation within 90 days occurred in eight (0.7%) knees. Patients with 2-year minimum follow-up had significant improvements in ROM, Knee Society Clinical, Functional and Pain scores (p < 0.005). Nine (0.8%) patients required revision. Manipulations were performed on 118 (10.3%) patients. The overall deep infection rate was 0.17% (2/1143).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient TKA is safe for a large proportion of patients. Certain medical co-morbidities increase the risk of overnight stay. Patients had significant improvement in ROM and outcome scores with low revision rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Variation in the Cost of Care for Different Types of Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Lower-extremity arthroplasty constitutes the largest burden on health-care spending of any Medicare diagnosis group. Demand for upper extremity arthroplasty also continues to rise. It is necessary to better understand costs as health care shifts toward a bundled-payment accounting approach. We aimed (1) to identify whether variation exists in total cost for different types of joint arthroplasty, and, if so, (2) to determine which cost parameters drive this variation.

METHODS

The cost of the episode of inpatient care for 22,215 total joint arthroplasties was calculated by implementing time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) at a single orthopaedic specialty hospital from 2015 to 2018. Implant price, supply costs, personnel costs, and length of stay for total knee, total hip, anatomic total shoulder, reverse total shoulder, total elbow, and total ankle arthroplasty were analyzed. Individual cost parameters were compared with total cost and volume.

RESULTS

Higher implant cost appeared to correlate with higher total costs and represented 53.8% of the total cost for an inpatient care cycle. Total knee arthroplasty was the least-expensive and highest-volume procedure, whereas total elbow arthroplasty had the lowest volume and highest cost (1.65 times more than that of total knee arthroplasty). Length of stay was correlated with increased personnel cost but did not have a significant effect on total cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Total inpatient cost at our orthopaedic specialty hospital varied by up to a factor of 1.65 between different fields of arthroplasty. The highest-volume procedures-total knee and hip arthroplasty-were the least expensive, driven predominantly by lower implant purchase prices.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We are not aware of any previous studies that have accurately compared cost structures across upper and lower-extremity arthroplasty with a uniform methodology. The present study, because of its uniform accounting process, provides reliable data that will allow clinicians to better understand cost relationships between different procedures.

Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed at an Ambulatory Surgery Center vs Hospital Outpatient Setting: Complications, Revisions, and Readmissions

BACKGROUND

Outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) utilization continues to grow. Literature suggests outpatient THA may result in low rates of complications and readmission. There are no studies comparing safety profiles of THA performed at ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) vs hospital outpatient (HOP) settings.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data were reviewed on all patients who underwent THA from 2013 to 2018. ASC and HOP subgroups were compared, investigating difference in demographics, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists subgroups, all complications, revisions, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions within the first 90 days of surgery. An additional subgroup analysis of patients younger than 65 years was performed.

RESULTS

Two surgeons performed 3063 THAs during the study period, including 965 outpatient cases (ASC = 335; HOP = 630). Thirty-seven (3.8%) complications occurred within 90 days. No differences were found between groups for 90-day complication rates (ASC = 13, 3.9%; HOP = 24, 3.8%; P = .48), revision rates (ASC = 0, 0%; HOP = 2, .3%; P = .30), all-cause reoperation rates (ASC = 1, 0.3%; HOP = 5, 0.8%; P = .35), ED visits (ASC = 3, 0.9%; HOP = 2, 0.3%; P = .23), or readmission rates (ASC = 2, 0.6%; HOP = 9, 1.4%; P = .25).

CONCLUSION

THA can be safely performed in both ASC and HOP settings with low 90-day postoperative complication, revision, reoperation, ED visit, and readmission rates. Based on the populations studied, we identified no statistically significant differences in rates of complications between ASC and HOP groups.

Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty-Patient Selection: Update on the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment Score

BACKGROUND

The Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score was designed to identify patients medically appropriate for same- and next-day discharge after surgery. The purpose of this study was to update and confirm the greater predictive utility of the OARA score in relation to American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification for same-day discharge and to identify the optimal preoperative OARA score for safe patient selection for outpatient surgery.

METHODS

The perioperative medical records of 2051 primary total joint arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon at an academic tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Six statistical measures were calculated to examine OARA score performance in binary classification of successful same-day discharge and preoperative OARA scores equal to 0 to 59 points (yes vs no) vs 0 to 79 points (yes vs no).

RESULTS

Mean OARA scores increased more sharply in magnitude with increasing length of stay, providing superior discrimination than the ASA-PS classification with respect to same-day discharge. Preoperative OARA scores up to 79 points approached the desired 100% for positive predictive value (98.8%) and specificity (99.3%) and 0% for false positive rates (0.7%).

CONCLUSION

The OARA score was designed to err in the direction of medical safety, and OARA scores between 0 and 79 are conservatively highly effective for identifying patients who can safely elect to undergo outpatient total joint arthroplasty. The ASA-PS classification does not provide sufficient discrimination for safely selecting patients for outpatient arthroplasty.