Death of the Lewinnek "Safe Zone"

Direct lateral vs. posterior-lateral approach in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic comparison

INTRODUCTION

The main goal of this study was to compare patient outcomes following robotic-arm assisted THA (RTHA) using the direct lateral approach (DLA) and the posterior-lateral approach (PLA) by analysing the clinical and radiographical data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

203 consecutive patients diagnosed with end stage hip osteoarthritis underwent RTHA at the same orthopaedic centre between 2015 and 2019. Patients were divided in two groups based on the surgical approach where 95 patients received PLA and 108 received DLA. All patients were assessed pre-operatively and at minimum 3-year follow-up using Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). A radiographic evaluation was performed for every patient to assess the incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO).

RESULTS

Patients in the PLA cohort had higher scores in the post-operative WOMAC when compared to the DLA group (PLA: 96.2 ± 8.2 vs. DLA: 93.6 ± 10.3, p = 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the post-op HHS (PLA 86.3 ± 7 vs. DLA: 86.3 ± 9.5, p = 0.97). Accurate component positioning was achieved according to the pre-operative planning in both groups. There were no cases of dislocation. We found a significantly higher incidence of HO in the DLA group (59.3%) compared to the PLA group (12.6%). However, this difference was not associated with a poorer clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Current controversy still persists regarding the surgical approach without clear evidence about which one is more appropriate. Nowadays, it seems that surgeons' skill and experience to perform an approach are still more relevant than the choice of the approach. Both PLA and DLA represent valid surgical options for performing RTHA, yielding excellent clinical outcomes without clear evidence of superiority of one approach over the other.

AI-assisted direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study based on artifact-reduced CT 3D reconstruction

Objective

To compare the accuracy of implant positioning and early functional recovery between direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral approach (PLA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) guided by an artificial intelligence preoperative planning system (AIHIP).

Methods

The study population consisted of 206 patients who underwent DAA surgery and 81 patients who underwent PLA surgery, all of whom were designed preoperatively using AI-HIP, and postoperatively using artefact-reduced CT reconstruction for prosthesis mounting angle measurements and follow-up such as postoperative outcomes. The main assessments included prosthesis positioning accuracy (compared to the preoperative plan): acetabular anterior inclination (AA), femur anterior inclination (FNA), combined anterior inclination (CA), alignment of femoral stem prosthesis and femur; clinical outcomes: operative time, hospital stay, and time to grounding; functional scores: Harris Hip Score, WOMAC, and VAS Pain Score; and biomarkers: haemoglobin, CRP, and IL-6, among others.

Results

All 287 patients completed ≥6-month follow-up. While preoperative femoral/acetabular anteversion showed no intergroup differences (p > 0.05), the direct anterior approach (DAA) demonstrated superior postoperative acetabular anteversion control (20.93 ± 7.54° vs. 24.34 ± 7.93°, p < 0.001) despite comparable femoral anteversion (12.97 ± 6.93° vs. 14.56 ± 7.21°, p = 0.009). AI-assisted predictions exhibited smaller deviations in DAA for both parameters (FNA: 3.12 ± 5.88° vs. 5.59 ± 8.21°, p = 0.005; AA: 0.93 ± 7.54° vs. -4.34 ± 7.93°, p < 0.001). No significant differences emerged in combined anteversion, acetabular abduction, or femoral stem alignment parameters (all p > 0.05). DAA achieved shorter incisions (10.64 ± 0.94 vs. 15.21 ± 1.33 cm, p < 0.001) and hospital stays (7.59 ± 4.18 vs. 9.09 ± 3.65 days, p < 0.001) despite longer operative times (118.67 ± 26.95 vs. 53.27 ± 58.71 min, p < 0.001). Functional recovery favored DAA, with better VAS/Harris scores at 3 months and WOMAC scores at 1 month (all p < 0.05). No intergroup differences were observed in postoperative CK, CRP, Hb, or IL-6 levels (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Both DAA and PLA approaches resulted in satisfactory postoperative outcomes; however, the DAA approach demonstrated enhanced early postoperative efficacy indicators, as well as improved femoral neck and acetabular anteversion compared to the PLA approach. This study advocates for the preferential adoption of the DAA technique for THA, while also emphasizing the importance of considering individual patient factors, as well as the surgeon's preferences and expertise.

The Influence of Cup Orientation on the Primary Fixation of a Hemispherical Cementless Acetabular Cup: A Cohort Based Finite Element Study

Cup orientation has been investigated in detail with respect to risk of dislocation, however, the impact on the primary fixation of cementless cups is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the influence acetabular component orientation on the primary fixation of cementless acetabular cups using an in silico clinical trial framework. Finite element models of 57 implanted hemi-pelves were generated from CT scans of a cohort of end stage osteoarthritis patients. Each hemi-pelvis was implanted with the with cup orientations that bounded the Lewinnek safe zone (mechanical alignment +/-10 degrees) and an approximation of the extreme orientations reported in the literature (mechanical alignment +/-20 degrees). Bone strain immediately adjacent to the implant and micromotions (gap and shear micromotions) were used to assess primary fixation. Analysis was performed at the levels of the individual subjects and the entire cohort. There was minimal variation in all metrics within the Lewinnek safe zone. Micromotion, particularly inferior gaping, was more sensitive to cup orientation than peri-prosthetic bone strain, tending to increase with inclination angle. Both the peri-prosthetic bone strains and micromotions were moderately correlated to the average bone modulus. Individuals with low bone modulus were shown to be more sensitive to changes in cup orientation for both peri-prosthetic bone strains and micromotions both within and outside the Lewinnek safe zone. This suggests that assessing bone quality should be routinely incorporated into the planning process, particularly when considering cup orientations outside of the Lewinnek safe zone.

Does Replicating Native Hip Biomechanics Improve Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Enabling technology, such as computer navigation and robotics, provides more precise implant position, which allows surgeons the ability for personalized alignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA). To date, THA implant position studies have focused on dislocation rates, rather than on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study evaluated the impact of the THA component position on clinically significant differences in PROMs.

METHODS

A total of 1,682 consecutive primary THAs were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component position as well as femoral offset and leg-length discrepancy (LLD) were measured on all preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Modern PROM scores were evaluated. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit, and patient-acceptable symptom state values were assessed for applicable PROMs. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed with P < 0.05 as significant. The mean clinical follow-up was 21.9 months (range, one to 128).

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, the acetabular component position closer to the native hip center of rotation was associated with a greater probability of achieving the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement MCID, substantial clinical benefit, and patient-acceptable symptom state thresholds (P ≤ 0.008). An increase in postoperative femoral offset was associated with achieving the MCID for the University of California Los Angeles activity level and patients being 'very satisfied or satisfied' (P ≤ 0.004). The mean postoperative LLD was 3.8 mm (range, 24.5 mm short to 36.6 mm long); however, postoperative LLD was not a predictor of PROMs (P ≥ 0.167) with statistical power ≥ 87%.

CONCLUSIONS

Study results demonstrated that replicating the native center of rotation and optimizing femoral offset was associated with clinically relevant improvements in PROMs. Interestingly, in this large cohort, leg length inequality was not associated with PROMs. Further research is warranted on THA component position, including spino-pelvic parameters and PROMs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Robotic-Assisted Surgery Does Not Decrease Prosthetic Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with instability and may be a cause of accelerated polyethylene wear and pain. Previous retrieval studies report a high prevalence of impingement in acetabular liners. Robotic technology has the potential to reduce THA instability as it enables technical precision and optimizes implant positioning. However, whether robotics can improve impingement prevalence is unknown. Thus, the objectives of this study were to: (1) determine the prevalence and severity of acetabular liner impingement with robotic navigation; and (2) compare impingement prevalence with a control cohort of manually placed THA liners.

METHODS

There were 18 robotic-assisted liners and 11 non-robotic controls scored for the presence and severity of impingement. Radiographic measurements of acetabular inclination and anteversion were assessed using prerevision standing radiographs. Femoral head size (36 being the most common), length of implantation, revision indication, age, gender, and body mass index were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the robotic liners, 61% showed impingement, while 45% of the non-robotic liners showed impingement (P = 0.14). The robotic group demonstrated a lower variance of inclination (robotic: 41.7° ± 3.9, control: 42.8° ± 7.1, P = 0.64) and lower anteversion variance (robotic: 22.8° ± 2.8, control: 20.8° ± 7.9, P = 0.43), but mean values did not differ between the groups. Impingement presence and severity were not related to head size, length of implantation, or other demographic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the use of robotic-assisted technology employing modern-day implants with larger diameter heads does not reduce the prevalence or severity of prosthetic impingement in retrieved acetabular liners from revision THA.

A novel preoperative prosthetic position planning algorithm for total hip arthroplasty based on the no-impingement principle: A case study

Most preoperative planning calculations of impingement-free range of motion (IFROM) and impingement-free safe zone (IFSZ) rarely consider non-standard shaped prostheses and bony impingement (BI) for total hip arthroplasty (THA). This research developed a novel algorithm that considers BI, prosthetic impingement, pelvic tilt angle (PT) in the sagittal plane, and non-standard-shaped hip prostheses. This research aimed to investigate the effect of BI and PT on hip IFROM, IFSZ, and the BI rate. Using this algorithm to calculate a case, we found that when considering BI, (1) the upper limit of the hip IFROM was decreased, and the different PT affected the upper limit of the hip IFROM of various movements; (2) the BI rate of the flat-rim liner in standing and sitting postures were 54.6% and 67%; and (3) the maximum IFSZ size of the flat-rim liner was reduced by 12%, the reduction rate of the combined pelvic position with a non-zero IFSZ size was 83.2% for the flat-rim liner. Consideration of BI further reduces the IFROM, the IFSZ size, and the number of the combined position of the pelvis with a non-zero IFSZ size of the hip joint. Importantly, this algorithm provides a reliable tool for personalized prosthesis positioning for THA. This algorithm has excellent applications in personalized surgical planning and surgical robotics.

Spinopelvic alignment and precise cup placement in total hip arthroplasty - A systematic review

Study Design

A systematic literature review and meta- analysis.

Objective

To extract and combine the available literature focused on normal and abnormal biomechanical principles of spine-pelvis-hip complex and to sum up the data in the application of THA both in the setting with and without spinal disorders.

Methods

An extensive search and analysis of the articles was done by 3 authors independently in 7 platforms based on PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Selection criteria 1. Articles that assessed spinopelvic parameters (SS, SPT, PI, and acetabular cup orientation) in patients undergoing THA, Articles that assessed balance in spinopelvic complex after THA, Randomized control studies, Systematic literature reviews, Meta-analyses, Clinical trials / original research studies, Review articles and Articles after 2015 were included. Cochrane's GRADE method was used to define the level of evidence. 2.Participants: Patients who underwent THA only (in asymptomatic spine), those who had ankylosing spondylitis and underwent THA and those who underwent THA with prior spinal arthrodesis. 3.Study parameters: Ante Inclination (AI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic Incidence (PI) and spinopelvic tilt (SPT) in both positions of standing and sitting. ΔAI, ΔSS and ΔSPT. Data were collected and analyzed, the means of the study parameters with SD were calculated and a meta-analysis is performed to evaluate the pooled means with optimal value range.

Results

From 218 abstracts extracted and after eligibility assessment and exclusion, 4 articles involving 439 patients were enrolled. The mean SS in standing and sitting calculated were 35.53±10.52 and 33.13±12.38. The mean of AI and SPT in standing /sitting positions are 29.7±12.29/34.69±12.96 (n = 242) and 19.56±8.9/21.22±12.53 (n=439) respectively. The ΔAI, ΔSS, and ΔSPT were 4.99,2.4 and 1.66 respectively.

Conclusion

There is a proportionate change between the spinopelvic tilt and the acetabular orientation in postural variations. Evaluation of spine, pelvis and hip becomes more critical in identifying these changes and thereby prompting the acetabular cup position in the functional safe zone.

The Association of Jumbo Femoral Heads and Acetabular Cup Position on Patient Outcomes After Modern Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Use of jumbo femoral heads (≥ 40 mm) in total hip arthroplasty decreases postoperative dislocation; however, may leave patients more susceptible to groin pain. Limited data exist for the effect of jumbo femoral heads and acetabular cup position on modern patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study evaluated the effect of jumbo femoral heads and acetabular cup position on PROMs after primary total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 328 consecutive primary THAs of a single implant system with various femoral head sizes (36% ≥ 40 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular cup inclination and anteversion were radiographically measured. Demographics, comorbidities, and implant sizes were documented. Prospectively collected University of California Los Angeles Activity Level, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR), and satisfaction were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 1.2 years (range, one to five). A P-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Femoral head size was not associated with University of California Los AngelesActivity Level scores at any time point (P ≥ 0.209). Independent of patient sex, the mean HOOS JR score was significantly higher in the ≥ 40 mm femoral head group compared to the < 40 mm head group at 4 months although not reaching a clinically significant threshold (mean difference 4.4, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.5 to 8.3, P = 0.027); however, mean scores at the latest follow-up were not different (P = 0.956). The HOOS JR scores ≥ 90 and being "very satisfied or satisfied" were associated with a wide range and several combinations of acetabular cup inclination and anteversion. A total of 88.9% of patients reported being "very satisfied or satisfied" at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients achieved comparable PROMs regardless of femoral head size, suggesting large femoral heads may not leave patients susceptible to groin pain in addition to reducing the risk of postoperative dislocation. Excellent patient outcomes correlated with wide ranges of acetabular cup positions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Lewinnek zone not "the be-all and end-all" functional planning for acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Proper positioning of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) plays a crucial role in the success and long-term survivorship of the implant. Cup positioning within the Lewinnek Safe Zone (LSZ) does not, however, avoid implant dislocation. Thus, the concept of a functional cup position has been introduced. The purpose of this study was to assess the discrepancy between LSZ and the acetabular cup position suggested by the patient's specific functional planning. The hypothesis was that a mismatch does exist.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with primary hip osteoarthritis undergoing primary THA with a personalized functional preoperative planning and patient-specific cup implantation system were enrolled. Anatomical and spino-pelvic functional parameters were recorded and, for each patient, a "safe cup orientation" was suggested. The suggested functional safe zone was compared to the LSZ.

RESULTS

The mean suggested inclination was 39° ± 3° (range 32°-45°). The mean suggested anteversion was 21° ± 3° (range 12°-28°). The patient's functional acetabular inclination (AI) corresponded to the LSZ in one of the 100 patients, whereas the acetabular anteversion (AV) was outside the LSZ in 8 of the 100 patients. The mean pelvic tilt while standing and sitting were 0.5° ± 7° (range 21°-45°) and -6° ± 16.7° (range -63°-33°), respectively. The mean pelvic incidence was 52° ± 9.7° (range 33°-83°).

CONCLUSION

When a functional patient's specific preoperative planning is performed, the LZS does not correspond to the patient's functional safe zone in about 8% of patients. The concept of a universal safe zone should be revisited, and a functional personalized safe zone may have to be more widely considered.

Accuracy of Acetabular Component Positioning Using a Mixed Reality-Guided Navigation System During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Surgeons increasingly recognize the importance of patient-specific considerations in determining ideal cup alignments. In addition, various surgical navigation systems have been reported to improve cup placement accuracy during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recently, a novel computed tomography (CT)-based planning and mixed-reality (MR) guidance system was developed to enable patient-specific 3-dimensional planning of the ideal cup position and further improve intraoperative achievement of the planned orientation.

Methods

This is retrospective, observational study of 40 patients (40 hips) who underwent MR-guided THA. Patient-specific CT-based surgical planning with definition of target operative anteversion and inclination of the acetabular cup in relation to the anterior pelvic plane was performed. 3D holograms of the cup and cup impactor in the selected target position were created and exported. Intraoperatively, automatic holographic registration was performed using a smart tool-based linked-paired-point matching method. Patient-specific content was displayed on a head-mounted display, and the acetabular component was inserted by matching the spatial position of the cup impactor with the hologram of the cup impactor in the target position. Postoperatively, patients underwent biplane simultaneous imaging for measurement of achieved cup alignment using a validated measurement method.

Results

Mean planned operative anteversion and inclination angles were 28.4° ± 1.6° (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.9°-28.8°) and 39.9° ± 0.3° (95% CI, 39.8°-40.0°), respectively. The mean absolute target error between preoperative target operative anteversion and the achieved operative anteversion was 0.7° ± 1.1° (95% CI, 0.3°-1.0°; range, 0°-4°). The mean absolute target error between preoperative target operative inclination and the achieved operative inclination was 1.1° ± 1.2° (95% CI, 0.7°-1.4°; range, 0°-4°).

Conclusion

Acetabular component positioning using a mixed reality guidance system during THA was highly accurate and well within the accuracy reported for other navigation systems.

Level of Evidence

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Provides Greater Implant Placement Accuracy and Lower Complication Rates, but Not Superior Clinical Results Compared to the Conventional Manual Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Accurate component placement plays a critical role in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Robotic-assisted THA (R-THA) has emerged as an option to optimize this aspect compared to the conventional manual THA (C-THA). The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the studies comparing R-THA and C-THA. The hypothesis was that the use of robotic technology could improve component positioning, but this advantage may not translate into clinically relevant benefits.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted on three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) in January 2024. The screening process and analysis were conducted separately by two independent observers according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The inclusion criteria were comparative studies, English language, no time limitation, and focusing on the comparison of R-THA and C-THA. Among the 1,883 articles retrieved, 38 studies (10,055 patients) were included. The meta-analysis covered radiological outcomes, clinical outcomes, perioperative parameters, complications, and revisions. The quality of each article was assessed using the "Downs and Black's checklist for measuring quality".

RESULTS

Robotic THA provided superior radiological results compared to C-THA in terms of acetabular cup placement within the Lewinnek safe zone (P < 0.01) and horizontal change of the rotation center (P = 0.03). No statistically significant difference was obtained in terms of clinical scores between the two approaches, including Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Forgotten Joint Score, and Merle d'Aubigné Hip Score. Robotic THA showed longer operative time (P < 0.01), but lower complication rates (P = 0.04). No difference was obtained in terms of intraoperative blood loss and revision rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that R-THA can provide more accurate cup placement and better restoration of the native hip anatomy while reducing complication rates compared to C-THA. However, these benefits did not translate into clinical differences in terms of patient-reported outcomes between the two approaches, and R-THA required longer operative time. While the overall results suggest some benefits with the robotic technology, future studies should investigate if further technical improvements will translate into clinically relevant benefits for patients undergoing THA.

Kinematic-kinetic compliant acetabular cup positioning based on preoperative motion tracking and musculoskeletal modeling for total hip arthroplasty

The invention of the surgical robot enabled accurate component implantation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, a preoperative surgical planning methodology is still lacking to determine the acetabular cup alignment considering the patient-specific hip functions during daily activities such as walking. To simultaneously avoid implant edgeloading and impingement, this study established a kinematic-kinetic compliant (KKC) acetabular cup positioning method based on preoperative gait kinematics measurement and musculoskeletal modeling. Computed tomography images around the hip joint and their biomechanical data during gait, including motion tracking and foot-ground reaction forces, were collected. Using the reconstructed pelvic and femur geometries, the patient-specific hip muscle insertions were located in the lower limb musculoskeletal model via point cloud registration. The designed cup orientation has to be within the patient-specific safe zone to prevent implant impingement, and the optimized value selected based on the time-dependent hip joint reaction force to minimize the risk of edgeloading. As a validation of the proposed musculoskeletal model, the predicted lower limb muscle activations for seven patients were correlated with their surface electromyographic measurements, and the computed hip contact force was also in quantitative agreement with data from the literature. However, the designed cup orientations were not always within the well-known Lewinnek safe zone, highlighting the importance of KKC surgical planning based on patient-specific biomechanical evaluations.

A Radiological Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Purpose

This study investigates the radiological outcomes of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RATHA) compared to manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA), addressing the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of RATHA in achieving superior implant positioning accuracy.

Methods

A prospective cohort of 212 patients (103 robotic, 109 manual) underwent THA and were evaluated for postoperative radiological outcomes, focusing on the inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular cup. Outlier prevalence was assessed based on angles outside the defined Lewinnek safe zones. All post-operative measurements were made using the BoneNinja application.

Results

High inter-observer and intra-observer reliabilities were observed, validating the measurement accuracy. The mean anteversion and inclination angles in the RATHA cohort were 40.5 ± 1.5 and 24.5 ± 3.1° respectively; and the mTHA cohort were 42.1 ± 4.9 and 24.9 ± 4.5°. There was a statistically significant difference in inclination angles between the two cohorts whereas the anteversion angles showed no difference. Majority of the conventional THRs (N = 72, 55.4%) were placed outside the safe zone for anteversion. The inclination angles revealed a highly significant difference between the cohorts (p < 0.0001), with all the robotic THRs (N = 121, 100%) being placed within the safe zone for inclination, whereas only 70% (N = 91) of the conventional THRs were within the safe zone. 97.5% of RA-THRs were within 3° of the proposed plan, demonstrating high accuracy.

Conclusion

RATHA significantly outperforms MTHA in radiological accuracy, achieving precise acetabular cup positioning with minimal outliers. These results advocate for RATHA's adoption in THA to enhance outcome predictability and affirm its reliability and safety over manual methods.

Decreased Instability in High-Risk (Hip-Spine 2B) Patients After Modifications of Surgical Planning and Technique

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) who have spinal deformity and a stiff spine are the highest-risk group for instability. Despite the increasing use of dual-mobility cups and large femoral heads, dislocation remains a major complication after THA. Preoperative planning becomes a critical aspect of ensuring precise component positioning within a safe zone. The purpose of this study was to investigate dislocation rates over a 9-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 4,731 THAs performed by 3 orthopaedic surgeons between January 2014 and March 2023 was performed. Spinopelvic measurements were conducted to determine the hip-spine classification group for each patient. Only patients classified as 2B (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis > 10° and Δsacral slope < 10°) were eligible. Both absolute and relative dislocation frequencies were then analyzed using time-series analysis techniques and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

A total of 281 hip-spine 2B patients undergoing primary THA were eligible for analysis (57% women; mean age, range: 66 years, 23 to 87; mean body mass index, range: 28, 16 to 45). The overall dislocation rate was 4.3%. Use of femoral head sizes ≥ 40 mm increased from 4% in 2014 to 2019 to 37% in 2020 to 2023 (P < .001), while the use of dual-mobility cups decreased from 100% in 2014 to 2019 to 37% in 2020 to 2023 (P < .001). Acetabular component planning was changed from the supine plane to the standing plane in February 2020. Those changes in surgical practice were notably correlated with a significant decrease in dislocation rates from 6.8% in 2014 to 2019 to 1.5% in 2020 to 2023 (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the introduction of advanced preoperative THA planning to the standing plane, coupled with precise intraoperative technology for implant placement, can significantly reduce the risk of instability in high-risk THA patients. Notably, we observed a significant decrease in dislocation rates, which aligned with the shift in surgical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Does Surgical Approach Affect Dislocation Rate After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion? A Retrospective Analysis of 16,223 Cases

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) is a risk factor for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The effect of the surgical approach on this association has not been investigated. This study examined the association between the surgical approach and dislocation following THA in patients who had prior LSF.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 16,223 primary elective THAs at our institution from June 2011 to September 2022. Patients who had LSF prior to THA were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Patients were stratified by LSF history, surgical approach, and intraoperative robot or navigation use to compare dislocation rates. There were 8,962 (55.2%) posterior, 5,971 (36.8%) anterior, and 1,290 (8.0%) laterally based THAs. Prior LSF was identified in 323 patients (2.0%). Binary logistic regressions were used to assess the association of patient factors with dislocation risk.

RESULTS

There were 177 dislocations identified in total (1.1%). In nonadjusted analyses, the dislocation rate was significantly higher following the posterior approach among all patients (P = .003). Prior LSF was associated with a significantly higher dislocation rate in all patients (P < .001) and within the posterior (P < .001), but not the anterior approach (P = .514) subgroups. Multivariate regressions demonstrated anterior (OR [odds ratio] = 0.64, 95% CI [confidence interval] 0.45 to 0.91, P = .013), and laterally based (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96, P = .039) approaches were associated with decreased dislocation risk, whereas prior LSF (OR = 4.28, 95% CI 2.38 to 7.69, P < .001) was associated with increased dislocation risk. Intraoperative technology utilization was not significantly associated with dislocation in the multivariate regressions (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.06, P = .095).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study confirmed that LSF is a significant risk factor for dislocation following THA; however, anterior and laterally based approaches may mitigate dislocation risk in this population. In multivariate analyses, including surgical approach, LSF, and several perioperative variables, intraoperative technology utilization was not found to be significantly associated with dislocation risk.

Change of Sacral Slope according to the Surgical Position in Total Hip Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Pelvis tilting in sagittal plane influences the acetabular cup position. Majority of total hip arthroplasty (THA) are performed in lateral decubitus surgical position. This study is to assess whether there is any difference in sacral slope between standing and lateral decubitus position and influence of this variation in planning acetabular cup anteversion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study including 50 patients operated between January 2020 to March 2022. Preoperative radiograph included lumbosacral spine lateral X-ray in standing, supine and lateral decubitus positions to calculate the sacral slope for assessment of anterior or posterior pelvic tilting. In our study, we determined the position of the acetabular cup based on changes in sacral slope between standing and lateral decubitus postures. For patients whose sacral slope increased from lateral decubitus to standing, we implanted the acetabular component with a higher degree of anteversion. Conversely, for patients with reverse phenomenon, the cup was inserted at lower anteversion.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (48.0%) had increase in sacral slope from lateral decubitus to standing whereas 26 patients (52.0%) had decrease in sacral slope. There was linear correlation between difference in preoperative sacral slope and postoperative cross table lateral cup anteversion. Harris hip scores improved from 40.78 to 85.43. There was no subluxation or dislocation in any patient at minimum 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Individualized acetabular cup placement is important for better functional outcome in THA. Evaluation of pelvic tilting in lateral decubitus position is necessary for better positioning of acetabular cup and avoid postoperative complications.

Fewer Dislocations After Total Hip Arthroplasty With Robotic Assistance or Fluoroscopic Guidance

BACKGROUND

Computer navigation and robotic assistance may reduce total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocations by improving the accuracy and precision of component positioning. We investigated dislocation rates for THAs using conventional techniques, robotic assistance, and computer navigation, while controlling for surgical approach, dual mobility (DM) use, and fluoroscopic guidance.

METHODS

We reviewed 11,740 primary THAs performed between June 2016 and December 2022, including 5,873 conventional, 1,293 with robotic-arm assistance, and 4,574 with navigation. The approach was posterior in 6,580 (56.0%), anterior in 4,342 (37.0%), and lateral in 818 (7.0%). A DM was used in 10.4%. Fluoroscopy was used in 3,653 cases and only with the anterior approach. Multivariate analyses yielded odds ratios (OR) for dislocation and revision. Additional regression analyses for dislocation were performed for approach and DM.

RESULTS

Raw dislocation rates were as follows: conventional 1.2%, robotic 0.4%, navigation 0.9%, anterior with fluoroscopy 0.4%, anterior without fluoroscopy 2.3%, posterior 1.3%, and lateral 0.5%. Upon multivariate analysis, use of robotics was found to be associated with significantly reduced dislocation risk compared to conventional (OR: 0.3), as did anterior (OR: 0.6) compared to posterior approach; navigation and lateral approach were not found to be associated with a significant reduction in risk. For the anterior approach, multivariate analysis demonstrated that fluoroscopy significantly reduced dislocation risk (OR: 0.1), while DM, robotics, and navigation were not significant. For the posterior approach, the dislocation risk was lower with robotics than with conventional (OR: 0.2); the use of navigation or DM did not demonstrate a significant reduction in risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of robotics was associated with a reduction in dislocations for this cohort overall. Further, fluoroscopy in the anterior approach and robotic assistance in the posterior approach were both associated with decreased dislocation risk. The role of imageless computer navigation and DM implants requires further study.

Intraoperative application of three-dimensional printed guides in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is of key importance to ensure satisfactory post-operative outcomes and to minimize the risk of complications. The majority of acetabular components are aligned freehand, without the use of navigation methods. Patient specific instruments (PSI) and three-dimensional (3D) printing of THA placement guides are increasingly used in primary THA to ensure optimal positioning.

AIM

To summarize the literature on 3D printing in THA and how they improve acetabular component alignment.

METHODS

PubMed was used to identify and access scientific studies reporting on different 3D printing methods used in THA. Eight studies with 236 hips in 228 patients were included. The studies could be divided into two main categories; 3D printed models and 3D printed guides.

RESULTS

3D printing in THA helped improve preoperative cup size planning and post-operative Harris hip scores between intervention and control groups (P = 0.019, P = 0.009). Otherwise, outcome measures were heterogeneous and thus difficult to compare. The overarching consensus between the studies is that the use of 3D guidance tools can assist in improving THA cup positioning and reduce the need for revision THA and the associated costs.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of 3D printing and PSI for primary THA can significantly improve the positioning accuracy of the acetabular cup component and reduce the number of complications caused by malpositioning.

Determination of optimal component positioning in THA using 3D preoperative planning

Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning tools can offer surgeons and design engineers detailed feedback and additional opportunities for clinical advancements. The objective of this study is to use a 3D total hip arthroplasty preoperative planning tool to compare femoral component alignment for three different stem systems. The planning tool in this study used morphology data of femoral bones gathered from a CT database, seven from postoperative patients and 63 from statistical shape models (SSMs), to suggest specific implant sizes and optimal placements in 3D to match each specific bone model. Retrospective validations of predicted stem size and femoral version were first performed by comparing planner-chosen and surgeon-implanted stem sizes and version angles for the seven postoperative patients. Next, the alignment of three different stem systems was evaluated using bone models generated from SSMs, with a quantitative focus on component head positioning. In the validation study, the planner accurately selected stem size and orientation compared to the surgeon for all assessed subjects. In the stem evaluation, the three stem systems yielded different accuracies in component placement, with the newest stem system demonstrating the closest restoration of anatomical head center location. It is evident that new stem designs may have the potential for increased accuracy over their predecessors, demonstrating that new stem designs can offer improved intraoperative and postoperative alignment potential. The 3D preoperative planning tools can provide novel and reliable data to both surgeons and design engineers, which can ultimately improve clinical outcomes and future implant designs.

Retrospective study comparing the accuracies of handheld infrared stereo camera and augmented reality-based navigation systems for total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The use of portable navigation systems (PNS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become increasingly prevalent, with second-generation PNS (sPNS) demonstrating superior accuracy in the lateral decubitus position compared to first-generation PNS. However, few studies have compared different types of sPNS. This study retrospectively compares the accuracy and clinical outcomes of two different types of sPNS instruments in patients undergoing THA.

METHODS

A total of 158 eligible patients who underwent THA at a single institution between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in the study, including 89 who used an accelerometer-based PNS with handheld infrared stereo cameras in the Naviswiss group (group N) and 69 who used an augmented reality (AR)-based PNS in the AR-Hip group (group A). Accuracy error, navigation error, clinical outcomes, and preparation time were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Accuracy errors for Inclination were comparable between group N (3.5° ± 3.0°) and group A (3.5° ± 3.1°) (p = 0.92). Accuracy errors for anteversion were comparable between group N (4.1° ± 3.1°) and group A (4.5° ± 4.0°) (p = 0.57). The navigation errors for inclination (group N: 2.9° ± 2.7°, group A: 3.0° ± 3.2°) and anteversion (group N: 4.3° ± 3.5°, group A: 4.3° ± 4.1°) were comparable between the groups (p = 0.86 and 0.94, respectively). The preparation time was shorter in group A than in group N (p = 0.036). There were no significant differences in operative time (p = 0.255), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.387), or complications (p = 0.248) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

An Accelerometer-based PNS using handheld infrared stereo cameras and AR-based PNS provide similar accuracy during THA in the lateral decubitus position, with a mean error of 3°-4° for both inclination and anteversion, though the AR-based PNS required a shorter preparation time.

Correlation between Acetabular Anteversion with a False-Profile View and Spinopelvic Parameters in Adult Spinal Deformity after Long-Segment Corrective Spinal Surgery

Introduction

Studies describing the relationship between the hip and spine have reported that corrective spinal surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) affects the orientation of the acetabulum. However, the extent to which spinal correction in ASD affects acetabular anteversion in the standing position is unclear, especially after total hip arthroplasty, for which dislocation is a concern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in anterior acetabular coverage in the upright position due to extensive correction surgery for ASD.

Methods

Thirty-six consecutive patients who had undergone spinal corrective surgery from the thoracolumbar region to the pelvis were enrolled and evaluated. The ventral-central-acetabular (VCA) angle and anterior acetabular head index (AAHI) were measured with a false-profile view to evaluate the relationship between acetabular anteversion in the standing position and spinopelvic parameters before and after surgery. The spinopelvic parameters measured included thoracic kyphosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis, and global tilt.

Results

The VCA angle and AAHI were significantly increased after spinal deformity correction (p<0.001). The changes in LL and PT were correlated with the VCA angle (LL: right, ρ=0.56; left, ρ=0.55, p<0.001; PT: right, ρ=-0.59; left, ρ=-0.64, p<0.001) and AAHI (LL: right, ρ=0.51; left, ρ=0.58, p<0.01; PT: right, ρ=-0.52; left, ρ=-0.59, p<0.01), respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed that a 10° increase in LL results in 1.4°-1.9° and 1.6%-2% increases in the VCA angle and AAHI, respectively.

Conclusions

Surgical correction for ASD significantly affects sagittal spinopelvic parameters, resulting in increased acetabular anteversion. The anterior coverage of the acetabulum in the postoperative standing position could be predicted with the intraoperatively measured LL, and evaluation using a false-profile was considered useful for treating ASD, particularly in patients after total hip arthroplasty.

A new designed full process coverage robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of a new complete robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) with that of the manual total hip arthroplasty (MTHA) and to verify the accuracy and safety of the former.

METHODS

Overall, 148 patients were enroled from 3 March 2021 to 28 December 2021 in this study and classified into RA-THA ( n =74 patients) and MTHA ( n =74 patients) groups. The sex, age, operative side, BMI, diagnosis, other basic information, operative time, acetabular prosthesis anteversion and inclination, femoral prosthesis anteversion and angulation, femoral prosthesis filling rate, leg length discrepancy (LLD), Harris hip score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the two groups regarding sex, age, operative side, BMI, diagnosis, Harris hip score, VAS score, acetabular inclination, acetabular prosthesis anteversion, femoral prosthesis anteversion, combined anteversion, and femoral prosthesis filling rate ( P >0.05). The operative time was significantly longer in the RA-THA group than in the MTHA group (106.71±25.22 min vs. 79.42±16.16 min; t=7.30, P <0.05). The femoral angulation (1.78°±0.64°) and LLD (2.87±1.55 mm) in the RA-THA group were significantly lesser than those in the MTHA group (2.22°±1.11° and 5.81±6.27 mm, respectively; t=-2.95 and t=-3.88, P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

The complete RA-THA has some advantages over the traditional procedure in restoring the lower limb length and controlling the femoral prosthesis angulation. Thus, this study verifies the accuracy and safety of the robot-assisted system.

Cemented dual-mobility constructs in uncemented revision acetabular components

Aims

Dislocation remains a leading cause of failure following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). While dual-mobility (DM) bearings have been shown to mitigate this risk, options are limited when retaining or implanting an uncemented shell without modular DM options. In these circumstances, a monoblock DM cup, designed for cementing, can be cemented into an uncemented acetabular shell. The goal of this study was to describe the implant survival, complications, and radiological outcomes of this construct.

Methods

We identified 64 patients (65 hips) who had a single-design cemented DM cup cemented into an uncemented acetabular shell during revision THA between 2018 and 2020 at our institution. Cups were cemented into either uncemented cups designed for liner cementing (n = 48; 74%) or retained (n = 17; 26%) acetabular components. Median outer head diameter was 42 mm. Mean age was 69 years (SD 11), mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 (SD 8), and 52% (n = 34) were female. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Mean follow-up was two years (SD 0.97).

Results

There were nine cemented DM cup revisions: three for periprosthetic joint infection, three for acetabular aseptic loosening from bone, two for dislocation, and one for a broken cup-cage construct. The two-year survivals free of aseptic DM revision and dislocation were both 92%. There were five postoperative dislocations, all in patients with prior dislocation or abductor deficiency. On radiological review, the DM cup remained well-fixed at the cemented interface in all but one case.

Conclusion

While dislocation was not eliminated in this series of complex revision THAs, this technique allowed for maximization of femoral head diameter and optimization of effective acetabular component position during cementing. Of note, there was only one failure at the cemented interface.

How the hip-spine relationship influences total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Motion in the spine, pelvis and hips which make up the spinopelvic femoral complex (SPFC) implies mechanical relationships that help maintain trunk balance and optimize hip functionThe aim of this study was to understand the physiology of the SPFC and evaluate the dysfunctions of the SPFC and their implications for total hip arthroplasty considering the hip-spine relationship.

METHODS

A review of relevant and comprehensive studies on this subject is reported in order to highlight a pathophysiology that integrates the description of the evaluations of the spine-pelvic and hip parameters and recommendations for the kinematic planning of the THA procedure. The primary objective was to determine which type of hip-spine relationship has the highest risk for THA complications and to become proficient in selecting the priority surgical intervention when both the hip and spine are affected. Finally, this review attempted to assist hip surgeons with surgical technique, tools, implant selection, and goals of planning a THA that requires personalized kinematic alignment. Determine the influence of THA on these kinematics and the effect of stiffness of the lumbopelvic complex on the risk of THA failure.

RESULTS

When a person sits, the pelvis goes into retroversion and the acetabulum opens forward. This frees the femoral head and neck to allow hip flexion. The opposite - pelvic anteversion - occurs when a person stands. When pelvic mobility is limited, the hip must increase its range of motion to accommodate these posture changes. Disturbances in spinal and pelvic kinematics lead to abnormal hip function, which may contribute to complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA).

CONCLUSION

A precise evaluation of the parameters governing the SPFC must be taken into account in order to best optimize the placement and choice of THA implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Anatomical cup implantation assisted with dynamic 3D planning improves functional outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Anatomical cup implantation is a promising approach in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and improves functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the cup position and functional outcomes in primary THA with preoperative dynamic 3D planning.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 54 hips in 48 patients who underwent primary THA with anatomical cup implantation (mean follow-up time: 52 months). Cup positions were evaluated based on patient-specific morphology, the acetabular fossa and the combined anteversion test. Functional outcomes were assessed after THA. The paired-sample t-test was performed for surgical and contralateral native hips among 42 patients who underwent unilateral THA.

RESULTS

Two hips suffered intraoperative trochanteric fracture, but no hip dislocations occurred. No patients reported groin or thigh pain, and all patients were capable of deep squatting and one-leg standing. The mean Harris hip score, WOMAC score, and physical SF-36 score were 94.46 ± 6.16, 10.41 ± 3.62, and 95.19 ± 8.74, respectively. Except for acetabular offset, THA restored biomechanics to those of contralateral native hip, including cup anteversion, abduction, femoral offset and acetabular height (P> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study provided evidence for the application of anatomical cup implantation assisted with dynamic 3D planning in primary THA, which restored morphology and improved functional outcomes.

Acetabular cup positioning in primary routine total hip arthroplasty-a review of current concepts and technologies

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has revolutionized the treatment of hip joint arthritis. With the increased popularity and success of the procedure, research has focused on improving implant survival and reducing surgical complications. Optimal component orientation has been a constant focus with various philosophies proposed. Regardless of the philosophy, achieving an accurate acetabular position for each clinical scenario is crucial. In this paper, we review the recent developments in improving the accuracy and ideal positioning of the acetabular cup in routine primary THA.

METHODOLOGY

A review of the recent scientific literature for acetabular cup placement in primary THA was performed, with available evidence for safe zones, spinopelvic relationship, preoperative planning, patient-specific instrumentation, navigation THA and robotic THA.

CONCLUSION

Though the applicability of Lewinnek safe zones has been questioned with an improved understanding of spinopelvic relationships, its role remains in positioning the acetabular cup in a patient with normal spinopelvic alignment and mobility. Evaluation of spinopelvic relationships and accordingly adjusting acetabular anteversion and inclination can significantly reduce the incidence of dislocation in patients with a rigid spine. In using preoperative radiography, the acetabular inclination, anteversion and intraoperative pelvic position should be evaluated. With improving technology and the advent of artificial intelligence, superior and more accurate preoperative planning is possible. Patient-specific instrumentation, navigated and robotic THA have been reported to improve accuracy in acetabular cup positioning as decided preoperatively but any significant clinical advantage over conventional THA is yet to be elucidated.

Improved accuracy of a novel fluoroscopy-based robotically assisted THA system compared to manual THA

Accurate acetabular cup position remains a persistent challenge in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Studies investigating the early outcomes of robotic-assisted THA (RA-THA) systems have shown improved cup placement compared to manual THA (mTHA) approaches, however, contemporary robotic platforms are reliant on pre-operative CT imaging. The goal of this study was to analyze the accuracy of a novel, fluoroscopy-based RA-THA system compared to an unassisted mTHA approach and determine the effect of the robotic system on operative time. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis on a consecutive series of 198 patients who received mTHA and RA-THA between March 2021 and July 2022. The primary outcome of interest was the accuracy of acetabular component placement, defined by average cup inclination and anteversion. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of acetabular cups positioned within the Lewinnek safe zone, operative time, and overall room time. The RA-THA group demonstrated significantly higher accuracy of acetabular anteversion to target compared to the manual group (18.5 vs. 21.7˚; p < 0.001), and had a significantly greater proportion of acetabular cups placed within the Lewinnek safe zone (81.6 vs. 59.0%; p < 0.001). The RA-THA cohort had longer operative times compared to mTHA group (39.0 vs. 35.3 min; p = 0.003), but no difference was seen in total operating room time (101.2 vs. 101.2 min; p = 0.982). This study demonstrates that the use of a novel, fluoroscopy-based, pin-less THA robotic platform increased the accuracy of acetabular cup placement, including a 22.6% improvement in safe zone placement, compared to mTHA approach, with no increase in overall case time.

Accuracy of Positioning and Risk Factors for Malpositioning Custom-Made Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is commonly performed using off-the-shelf implants. In the case of a severe mismatch between the anatomy of the proximal femur and the geometry of the stem, the use of custom-made stems might become necessary. The goal of this study was to investigate the precision of the implantation of custom-made stems of one manufacturer (CTX stem, AQ Implants) and to determine risk factors for malpositioning. All patients receiving a custom-made CTX stem between 2014 and 2020 at six high-volume academic centers were retrospectively recruited. The achieved position of the stem, as determined by stem version, stem coronal angle, and implantation depth on radiographs, was compared to the plan. The influence of radiographic and demographic parameters on the position was investigated. The results revealed a high variability of the achieved implant position in relation to the preoperative plan. While the stem coronal angle only differed slightly from the intended position, the stem version and the implantation depth showed a high frequency and amount of deviation. Right stems showed significantly higher positions than planned. Surgeons must be aware of this potential problem when implanting custom-made stems.

A Novel Method to Calculate Functional Pelvic Tilt Using a Standing Anteroposterior Pelvis Radiograph

Background

Functional patient-specific acetabular component positioning is important in total hip arthroplasty. We preoperatively evaluate the pelvic tilt (PT) on standing anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs using a novel measurement and then recreate this intraoperatively using imaging. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a linear correlation between this novel measurement and the actual PT.

Methods

A retrospective study of 200 patients was performed, measuring PT on standing lateral radiographs as the angle between the anterior superior iliac spines and the pubic symphysis. On the AP pelvis radiographs, the trans-teardrop (TT) line was drawn between the teardrops. The vertical distance between the TT line and the top of the pubic symphysis (TTPS) was then measured. A ratio was made between the lengths of both lines to account for the overall size of the pelvis (TTPS/TT). Linear regression analysis was then performed between PT and TTPS/TT.

Results

There was a strong linear correlation between the TTPS/TT ratio on AP pelvis radiographs and PT on lateral radiographs (r = 0.785, r² = 0.616, P < .001). On subanalysis of the female cohort, the correlation became even stronger (r = 0.864, r² = 0.747, P < .001). Using regression analysis, a linear equation was created (PT = 97.32 [TTPS/TT] - 5.51), to calculate the PT using the TTPS/TT ratio.

Conclusions

There is a strong linear correlation between the TTPS/TT ratio and PT. Using this information, a surgeon can reliably use the distance between the TT line and the superior pubic symphysis on an AP radiograph to recreate the patient's functional PT intraoperatively, allowing for a more accurate patient-specific placement of the acetabular component.

Does Individualization of Cup Position Affect Prosthetic or Bone Impingement Following THA?

INTRODUCTION

Spinopelvic (SP) mobility patterns during postural changes affect three-dimensional acetabular component position, the incidence of prosthetic impingement, and total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability. Surgeons have commonly placed the acetabular component in a similar "safe zone" for most patients. Our purpose was to determine the incidence of bone and prosthetic impingement with various cup orientations and determine if a preoperative SP analysis with individualized cup orientation lessens impingement.

METHODS

A preoperative SP evaluation of 78 THA subjects was performed. Data was analyzed using a software program to determine the prevalence of prosthetic and bone impingement with a patient individualized cup orientation versus six commonly selected cup orientations. Impingement was correlated with known SP risk factors for dislocation.

RESULTS

Prosthetic impingement was least with the individualized choice of cup position (9%) vs. preselected cup positions (18 to 61%). The presence of bone impingement (33%) was similar in all groups and not affected by cup position. Factors associated with impingement in flexion were age, lumbar flexion, pelvic tilt (stand to flexed seated), and functional femoral stem anteversion. Risk factors in extension included standing pelvic tilt, standing SP tilt, lumbar flexion, pelvic rotation (supine to stand and stand to flexed seated), and functional femoral stem anteversion.

CONCLUSION

Prosthetic impingement is reduced with individualized cup positioning based on SP mobility patterns. Bone impingement occurred in one-third of patients and is a noteworthy consideration in preoperative THA planning. Known SP risk factors for THA instability correlated with the It dependspresence of prosthetic impingement in both flexion and extension.

Risk of Dislocation and Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Lumbar Fusion With Spinopelvic Fixation

BACKGROUND

The effect of spinopelvic fixation in addition to lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) on dislocation/instability and revision in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been reported previously.

METHODS

The PearlDiver Research Program was used to identify patients aged 30 and above undergoing primary THA who received (1) THA only, (2) THA with prior single-level LSF, (3) THA with prior 2-5 level LSF, or (4) THA with prior LSF with spinopelvic fixation. The incidence of THA revision and dislocation/instability was compared through logistic regression and Chi-squared analysis. All regressions were controlled for age, gender, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI).

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2018, 465,558 patients without history of LSF undergoing THA were examined and compared to 180 THA patients with prior spinopelvic fixation, 5,299 with prior single-level LSF, and 1,465 with prior 2-5 level LSF. At 2 years, 7.8% of THA patients with prior spinopelvic fixation, 4.7% of THA patients with prior 2-5 level LSF, 4.2% of THA patients with prior single-level LSF, and 2.2% of THA patients undergoing only THA had a dislocation event or instability (P < .0001). After controlling for length of fusion, pelvic fixation itself was associated with higher independent risk of revision (at 2 years: 2-5 level LSF + spinopelvic fixation: aHR = 3.15, 95% CI 1.77-5.61, P < .0001 vs 2-5 level LSF with no spinopelvic fixation: aOR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.10-1.76, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

At 2 years, spinopelvic fixation in THA patients were associated with a greater than 3.5-fold increase in hip dislocation risk compared to those without LSF, and an over 2-fold increase in THA revision risk compared to those with LSF without spinopelvic fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of the early clinical efficacy of the SuperPath approach versus the modified Hardinge approach in total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical efficacy and advantages of the SuperPath approach for total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly population.

METHODS

From February 2018 to March 2019, 120 patients were randomly divided into two groups with 60 patients each: the SuperPath group and the conventional group. The results evaluated included the general operation situation, serum markers, blood loss, pain score, hip function and prosthesis location analysis.

RESULTS

There was no demographic difference between the two groups. Compared with the conventional group, the SuperPath group had a shorter operation time (78.4 vs. 93.0 min, p = 0.000), a smaller incision length (5.8 vs. 12.5 cm, p = 0.000), less intraoperative blood loss (121.5 vs. 178.8 ml, p = 0.000), a shorter hospitalization time (8.0 vs. 10.8 days, p = 0.000) and less drainage volume (77.8 vs. 141.2 ml, p = 0.000). The creatine kinase level in the SuperPath group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group, while there was no difference in the C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate level. The visual analog scale score was lower one month postoperatively, and the Harris hip score was higher three months postoperatively in the SuperPath group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the cup abduction angle or anteversion angle of the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We found better clinical efficacy after using the SuperPath approach with less muscle damage, less postoperative pain and better postoperative function than after using the modified Hardinge approach. Trial registration The randomized clinical trial was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 31/12/2020 (ChiCTR-2000041583, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=57008 ).

Large Femoral Heads and Select Dual-Mobility Bearings Are Associated With Reduced Instability in Contemporary Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Postoperative dislocation is considered the main drawback of posterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA). Thinner highly cross-linked polyethylene and dual-mobility bearings allow maximizing femoral head diameter per a given cup size. This study evaluated dislocation rates as large femoral head bearings were introduced into a practice over an 11-year period.

METHODS

A total of 1,511 consecutive primary THAs were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, implant sizes, femoral head-acetabular cup ratio, and dislocation status were collected from the electronic medical record. Data were evaluated using time series analysis techniques as larger femoral heads, thinner polyethylene liners, and dual-mobility bearings were introduced. The cohort was 57% women with mean age and body mass index of 62 years (range, 13 to 93) and 31 kg/m² (range, 13 to 54), respectively.

RESULTS

The overall dislocation rate was 0.98%. Use of femoral head sizes ≥ 40 millimeters increased from 4% in the years 2010 to 2016 to 51% in the years 2017 to 2021, correlating with a 50% reduction in dislocation rate from 1.4% to 0.7% (P = .279). Also, no dislocations occurred in patients who had dual-mobility bearings or ≥ 40-millimeter femoral heads (P = .007). Twelve of 14 dislocations occurred in cases with head-cup ratio < 0.7 (P = .013). Thirteen of 14 dislocations were in women (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Maximizing the femoral head diameter per given cup size correlated with a decrease in dislocation rate in modern posterior approach THA. Furthermore, these results suggest that dual-mobility articulations should be reserved for high-risk patients or patients in whom a 40-millimeter femoral head is not possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV-consecutive case series; no control group.

Aesthetic Results, Functional Outcome and Radiographic Analysis in THA by Direct Anterior, Bikini and Postero-Lateral Approach: Is It Worth the Hassle?

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be performed by several approaches such as direct anterior (DAA), direct lateral (DL) and postero-lateral (PL). Our study was conducted to compare among different approaches, such as DAA, bikini (BK) and PL, the aesthetic impact of the scar, differences in the position of prosthetic components and differences in functional rehabilitation outcomes. Materials and methods: Population, composed by 240 patients, was collected among patients treated for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 and divided by surgical approach. Of these, 160 female patients were included in the current analysis, leaving 58 DAA, 52 BK patients and 50 PL patients. Demographic and clinical parameters were retrospectively collected: age, BMI, time of surgery, length of stay, Harris Hip Score (HHS) before and after surgery at 6 months and patient, intra/post-surgical complications and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Results and Discussion: Our results showed a better aesthetical result in BK group compared to DAA group and faster rehabilitation with the DAA compared to PL. Optimal cup positioning was reached both in PL approach and DAA approach. DAA showed no increase in complications compared to PL approach and offered a faster recovery. Bikini approach is an alternative to the standard DAA approach and can be proposed for patients where a better aesthetic result is desired in addition to better functional recover.

Anterior pelvic plane estimation for total hip arthroplasty using a joint ultrasound and statistical shape model based approach

Orienting properly the prosthetic cup in total hip arthroplasty is key to ensure the postoperative stability. Several navigation solutions have been developed to assist surgeons in orienting the cup regarding the anterior pelvic plane (APP), defined by both anterior superior iliac spines (ASIS) and the pubic symphysis. However acquiring the APP when the patient is ready for surgery, i.e., mainly in lateral decubitus, is difficult due to the contralateral ASIS being against the operating table. We propose a method to determine the APP from both (1) alternative anatomical landmarks which are easy to acquire with a navigated ultrasound probe and (2) a Statistical Shape Model (SSM) of the pelvis. After creating a pelvic SSM from 40 data, a SSM-based morphometric analysis has been carried out to identify the best anatomical landmarks allowing the easy determination of the APP. The proposed method has then been assessed with both in silico and in vivo experiments on respectively forty synthetic data, and five healthy volunteers. The in silico experiment shows the feasibility to determine the APP with an average error of 4.7^∘ by only acquiring the iliac crest, the anterior superior iliac spine, the anterior inferior iliac spine, and the pubic symphysis. The average in vivo error using the ultrasound modality was 7.3^∘ with an estimated impact on both the cup anteversion and inclination of 4.0^∘ and 1.7^∘ respectively. The proposed method shows promising results that could allow the determination of the APP in lateral decubitus with a clinically acceptable impact on the computation of the cup orientation.

Statistical Shape Modelling the In Vivo Location of Acetabular Wear in Retrieved Hip Implants

Edge-wear in acetabular cups is known to be correlated with greater volumes of material loss; the location of this wear pattern in vivo is less understood. Statistical shape modelling (SSM) may provide further insight into this. This study aimed to identify the most common locations of wear in vivo, by combining CT imaging, retrieval analysis and SMM. Shape variance was described in 20 retrieved metal-on-metal acetabular surfaces. These were revised after a mean of 90 months, from 13 female and seven male patients. They were positioned with a mean inclination and anteversion of 53° and 30°, respectively. Their orientation, in vivo, was established using their stabilising fins, visible in pre-revision CT imaging. The impact of wear volume, positioning, time, gender and size on the in vivo location of wear was investigated. These surfaces had a mean wear volume of 49.63 mm³. The mean acetabular surface displayed superior edge-wear centred 7° within the posterosuperior quadrant, while more of the volumetric wear occurred in the anterosuperior quadrant. Components with higher inclination had greater superior edge-wear scars, while a relationship was observed between greater anteversion angles and more posterosuperior edge-wear. This SSM method can further our understanding of hip implant function, informing future design and may help to refine the safe zone for implant positioning.

Repeatability of Inertial Measurement Units for Measuring Pelvic Mobility in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

Consideration of pelvic mobility when positioning implants for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been shown to reduce the risk of complications such as dislocation, squeaking and excessive wear. We aim to test the repeatability of pelvic tilt measurements taken between three positions (standing, flexed-seated and step-up) by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and hence, evaluate their reliability in screening for high pelvic mobility in patients undergoing THA. The repeated IMU measurements of pelvic tilt were analysed for consistency and compared with measures taken by x-ray analysis. Our study showed greater variation in measures taken by the IMU particularly in the flexed-seated position. The patient's pelvic tilt in this position negatively correlated with their mid-back angle, suggesting the posture of the patient is a source of variation in the flexed-seated position if not kept consistent during assessments. IMUs were overall able to produce accurate and reliable measurements of pelvic tilt; however, protocols will need to be adjusted to factor in a patient's mid-back angle when taking future readings.

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement during anterolateral supine total hip arthroplasty using intraoperative fluoroscopy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

In our institution, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed using the anterolateral supine (ALS) approach with intraoperative fluoroscopy. This study aimed to investigate and review the accuracy of acetabular cup placement in ALS-THA using intraoperative fluoroscopy.

METHODS

A total of 142 patients with 154 joints (mean age 64.3 years, 30 males and 112 females) underwent ALS-THA with intraoperative fluoroscopy at the same institution. The target angle of the cup position was set at 40° for radiographic inclination (RI) and 5°-25° for radiographic anteversion (RA) based on the functional pelvic plane according to the pelvic motion during individual postural changes. The cup position angle was measured using postoperative computed tomography, and the error in the target angle was investigated.

RESULTS

The target angle of RI was 40°, and the postoperative RI was 39.3° ± 4.3°. The target angle of the RA was 17° ± 2.6°, and the postoperative RA was 20.6° ± 3.7°. The absolute values of the error from the target angle were 3.6° ± 2.5° for RI and 4.2° ± 3.3° for RA. For RI and RA, 67.5% (104/154 joints) were within ± 5° of the target and 96.1% (148/154 joints) were within ± 10°.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of cup positioning in ALS-THA using intraoperative fluoroscopy was good and appeared comparable to that of various navigation systems.

Elucidation of target implant orientations with the safety range of hip rotation with adduction or abduction during squatting: Simulation based on in vivo replaced hip kinematics

Objectives: The study aimed to elucidate target cup orientation and stem anteversions to avoid impingement between the liner and stem neck even at hip rotation with adduction during the deeply flexed posture.

Methods: A computer simulation analysis was performed on 32 total hip arthroplasty patients applying patient-specific orientation of the components and in vivo hip kinematics obtained from three-dimensional analysis of the squatting motion. The anterior/posterior liner-to-neck distance and impingement were evaluated based on a virtual change in internal/external rotation (0°–60°) and adduction/abduction (0°–20°) at actual maximum flexion/extension during squatting. Cutoff values of cup orientations, stem anteversion, and combined anteversion to avoid liner-to-neck impingements were determined.

Results: The anterior liner-to-neck distance decreased as internal rotation or adduction increased, and the posterior liner-to-neck distance decreased as external rotation or adduction increased. Negative correlations were found between anterior/posterior liner-to-neck distances at maximum flexion/extension and internal/external rotation. Anterior/posterior liner-to-neck impingements were observed in 6/18 hips (18/56%) at 45° internal/external rotation with 20° adduction. The range of target cup anteversion, stem anteversion, and combined anteversion to avoid both anterior and posterior liner-to-neck impingements during squatting were 15°–18°, 19°–34°, and 41°–56°, respectively.

Conclusion: Simulated hip rotations caused prosthetic impingement during squatting. Surgeons could gain valuable insights into target cup orientations and stem anteversion based on postoperative simulations during the deeply flexed posture.

Spinopelvic Hypermobility Corrects After Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Spinopelvic hypermobility may be secondary to a stiff osteoarthritic hip with a compliant spine. Purpose: We sought to determine if spinopelvic hypermobility resolves after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and when it resolves in patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing staged bilateral THA. We also sought to analyze the change in spinopelvic parameters before and after the second THA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 2047 THAs that were performed by 2 fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons from 2014 to 2018. Patients with preoperative spinopelvic hypermobility undergoing staged bilateral THA were identified. Radiographic spinopelvic parameters, including sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL mismatch, anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPt), and spinopelvic tilt (SPT), were measured on preoperative, 6-week postoperative, and 1-year postoperative lateral standing and sitting radiographs. Bilateral hip OA was graded using Kellgren-Lawrence criteria. Results: We identified 42 patients with preoperative spinopelvic hypermobility who underwent staged bilateral THA. Mean time (standard deviation) between surgeries was 9.4 months (±10.0). After the first THA, spinopelvic hypermobility resolved in 29% of the patients. After the second THA, it resolved in 67% at 6 weeks, increasing to 98% at 1 year postoperatively. Conclusion: Spinopelvic hypermobility resolves after staged bilateral THA in 98% of the patients, occurring most often only after the second THA. Less than one-third of the patients had resolution after the first THA, suggesting that contralateral hip OA continues to drive hip-driven spinopelvic motion. Acetabular component position targets based on functional pelvic position should incorporate these changes in spinopelvic motion with the understanding that resolution of hypermobility usually occurs after the second THA.

The efficacy of patient specific instrumentation (PSI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been suggested to reduce improper component positioning, though the effectiveness of PSI in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes comparing PSI and standard instrumentation (SI).

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA statement and was registered on PROSPERO. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies pertaining to the use of PSI in THA. Inclusion criteria included PSI used in THA, PSI was directly compared to SI, and publication in English. Exclusion criteria included non-primary THA, review articles, abstracts, book chapters, and animal models.

Results

2,458 studies were initially identified, with 13 studies (677 THAs: 338 controls, 339 PSI) meeting all criteria. PSI was favored for the deviation from the preoperative plan for acetabular cup position for anteversion (p = 0.04) and inclination (p = 0.0002); risk of acetabular cup positioning outside the Lewinnek safe zone for anteversion (p = 0.005) and inclination (p < 0.0001); and postoperative Harris Hip Score (p = 0.0002). No significant differences were found for the deviation from the preoperative plan for femoral stem position for anteversion (p = 0.74) or varus/valgus (p = 0.15); intraoperative time (p = 0.55); or intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.62).

Conclusion

The use of PSI in THA is effective in improving acetabular component positioning and postoperative functional outcomes, without increasing intraoperative time or blood loss, compared to SI.

Assessing component orientation of total hip arthroplasty using the low-dose bi-planar radiographs

Background

Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) reconstruction is the reference standard for measuring component orientation. However, functional cup orientation in standing position is preferable compared with supine position. The low-dose bi-planar radiographs can be used to analyze standing cup component orientation. We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the component orientation using the low-dose bi-planar radiographs compared with the 3D CT reconstruction, and explore the differences between the functional cup orientation in standing radiographs and supine CT scans.

Methods

A retrospective study, including 44 patients (50 hips) with total hip arthroplasty (THA), was conducted. CT scans were taken 1 week after surgery and the low-dose bi-planar radiographs were taken in the follow-up 6 weeks later. Component orientation measurement was performed using the anterior pelvic plane and the radiographic coronal plane as reference, respectively.

Results

The study showed no significant difference in cup anteversion (p = 0.160), cup inclination (p = 0.486), and stem anteversion (p = 0.219) measured by the low-dose bi-planar radiographs and 3D reconstruction. The differences calculated by the Bland–Altman analysis ranged from − 0.4° to 0.6° for the three measured angles. However, the mean absolute error was 4.76 ± 1.07° for functional anteversion (p = 0.035) and 4.02 ± 1.08° for functional inclination (p = 0.030) measured by the bi-planar radiographs and supine CT scans.

Conclusions

The low-dose bi-planar radiographs are the same reliable and accurate as 3D CT reconstruction to assess post-THA patients’ component orientation, while providing more valuable functional component orientation than supine CT scans.

The application of custom-made 3D-printed titanium augments designed through surgical simulation for severe bone defects in complex revision total hip arthroplasty

Background

With the development of radiology and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology, custom-made 3D-printed titanium augments have been more widely used. However, the radiological and clinical outcomes of custom-made augments lack reports. To better understand the clinical effect of using 3D-printed titanium augments and the significance of accurate placement, the aim of this study was to assess the outcomes when using custom-made 3D-printed titanium augments and to validate the idea that surgical simulation should be done before designing custom-made augments.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on 31 surgical simulations and revision total hip arthroplasties using custom-made 3D-printed titanium augments. The safe zone, cup position, and hip rotation center were measured on anteroposterior radiographs. Clinical outcomes were assessed with a mean 21.1 months of follow-up.

Results

All patients were positioned within the safe zone, and none of the acetabular cups nor the custom-made augments had any evidence of migration at the latest follow-up. A strong correlation was found between the planned cup position and the postoperative position. The average vertical position of the center of rotation was significantly increased from 3.55 cm to 2.35 cm. The mean Harris Hip Score was increased from 40.81 preoperatively to 65.46 postoperatively. Complications included gait abnormality, groin pain, fracture of the greater trochanter, and partial palsy of the sciatic nerve. However, patient satisfaction reached 92.3%.

Conclusion

Surgical simulations help to design custom-made augments accurately and improve surgical plans. Acetabular components supported with custom-made 3D-printed augments is a useful method to bridge severe bone deficiencies. In this study, both the radiologic results and clinical outcomes were favorable.

Level of evidence

Level 4.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10195-022-00656-5.

Postoperative acetabular component position in revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the anterior and posterior approaches

BACKGROUND

While previously considered unsuitable for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), the direct anterior approach (DAA) can be extended to allow for safe acetabular component revision. In primary hip arthroplasty, the DAA and its associated fluoroscopy, has been shown to produce more acceptable component positioning. However, there is little data comparing the DAA to the posterior approach (PA) for rTHA. We hypothesised that, the DAA with intraoperative fluoroscopy would allow for more precise acetabular component positioning when compared to those performed using a PA.

METHODS

50 consecutive patients (25 DAA and 25 PA) undergoing rTHA were included. Radiographic analysis of postoperative acetabular component position was then performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to assess the contribution of approach on cup positioning inside classically defined "safe zones".

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics were similar. The PA was associated with more cups placed outside the Lewinnek (48% vs. 12%, p = 0.005) and the Danoff (52% vs. 28%, p = 0.083) "safe zones" when compared to the DAA. Multivariate analysis revealed that operative approach was the only patient or surgical factor associated with component position outside of the "safe zones" (Lewinnek [OR = 13.6; 95% CI, 2.12-87.9, p = 0.006] and Danoff [OR = 7.7; 95% CI, 1.48-40.1, p = 0.015]).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the DAA allows for more reproducible and precise cup placement in RTHA. The safe-zone paradigm remains a useful index of accurate cup positioning and the DAA, with use of intraoperative fluoroscopy, offers more consistent acetabular component positioning when compared to the PA.

Instability After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Dual Mobility Versus Jumbo Femoral Heads

BACKGROUND

The use of dual mobility (DM) articulations has grown substantially over the last decade to help minimize dislocation risk. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of DM articulations to jumbo femoral heads of equivalent sizes as they relate to postoperative dislocation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed at a single institution between 2005 and 2018. DM articulations and large-diameter metal-on-metal femoral heads were included. Patients were followed with Harris Hip Scores and standard radiographs. Complications were prospectively recorded. Statistical analyses included chi-squared and Brown-Forsythe tests.

RESULTS

In total, 1,288 Magnum femoral head THAs and 365 Active Articulation DM THAs were included for analysis. The same monoblock cup was implanted via a posterior approach in all cases. Age, gender, body mass index, and diagnosis were similar between groups. Average follow-up in the DM group was 49 months, and 126 months in the jumbo head group. The average head sizes in the DM and jumbo head groups were 50 mm. There were no dislocations in the DM hips and only 2 (0.2%) in the jumbo femoral head group. Both groups had significant improvements in Harris Hip Score from their preoperative baseline.

CONCLUSION

Our study found similarly low dislocation rates in DM and jumbo femoral heads in primary THA. No evidence currently exists showing a benefit of the DM articulation beyond that of the large effective head size, and we recommend making every attempt at maximizing head size prior to using DM articulations.

The Effect of Hip Offset and Spinopelvic Abnormalities on the Risk of Dislocation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with abnormal spinopelvic motion are at increased risk of dislocation. However, little is known about the effect of hip offset on dislocation risk following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with abnormal spinopelvic motion. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of under-restored hip offset and spinopelvic abnormalities in a series of THA patients treated for recurrent instability.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients treated for hip instability following primary THA (THA+I) from 2012 to 2020. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and radiographic parameters were recorded. THA+I patients were compared to an age-matched and gender-matched control THA population without hip instability (THA). Univariate analyses were performed to compare differences between groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-three THA+I patients (44 hips) were compared to 44 THA patients (44 hips). THA+I patients had a higher prevalence of spinopelvic pathology (odds ratio [OR] 7.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-23.50, P < .001). The majority of acetabular components were placed within the Lewinnek safe zone (86.4% THA+I vs 72.7% THA; P = .119). THA+I patients were at greater risk of markedly under-restored hip offset (Δoffset ≤ 3 mm; OR 6.34, 95% CI 2.20-18.30, P = .001) and small (<32 mm) femoral head diameter (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.53-12.53, P = .006) compared to THA patients.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar degenerative disease and under-restoration of hip offset were present in a high proportion of patients with hip instability. Although multiple factors may contribute to THA instability, these data suggest that restoration of offset is essential, particularly in patients with spinopelvic pathology, and may be more important than historically described acetabular targets.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Image-Less THA Cup Navigation in Clinical Routine Setup: Individual Adjustments, Accuracy, Precision, and Robustness

Background and Objectives: Even after the ‘death’ of Lewinnek’s safe zone, the orientation of the prosthetic cup in total hip arthroplasty is crucial for success. Accurate cup placement can be achieved with surgical navigation systems. The literature lacks study cohorts with large numbers of hips because postoperative computer tomography is required for the reproducible evaluation of the acetabular component position. To overcome this limitation, we used a validated software program, HipMatch, to accurately assess the cup orientation based on an anterior-posterior pelvic X-ray. The aim of this study were to (1) determine the intraoperative ‘individual adjustment’ of the cup positioning compared to the widely suggested target values of 40° of inclination and 15° of anteversion, and evaluate the (2) ‘accuracy’, (3) ‘precision’, and (4) robustness, regarding systematic errors, of an image-free navigation system in routine clinical use. Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective, accuracy study in a single surgeon case series of 367 navigated primary total hip arthroplasties (PiGalileoTM, Smith+Nephew) through an anterolateral approach performed between January 2011 and August 2018. The individual adjustments were defined as the differences between the target cup orientation (40° of inclination, 15° of anteversion) and the intraoperative registration with the navigation software. The accuracy was the difference between the intraoperative captured cup orientation and the actual postoperative cup orientation determined by HipMatch. The precision was analyzed by the standard deviation of the difference between the intraoperative registered and the actual cup orientation. The outliers were detected using the Tukey method. Results: Compared to the target value (40° inclination, 15° anteversion), the individual adjustments showed that the cups are impacted in higher inclination (mean 3.2° ± 1.6°, range, (−2)−18°) and higher anteversion (mean 5.0° ± 7.0°, range, (−15)−23°) (p < 0.001). The accuracy of the navigated cup placement was −1.7° ± 3.0°, ((−15)−11°) for inclination, and −4.9° ± 6.2° ((−28)−18°) for anteversion (p < 0.001). Precision of the system was higher for inclination (standard deviation SD 3.0°) compared to anteversion (SD 6.2°) (p < 0.001). We found no difference in the prevalence of outliers for inclination (1.9% (7 out of 367)) compared to anteversion (1.63% (6 out of 367), p = 0.78). The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the differences between the intraoperatively captured final position and the postoperatively determined actual position were spread evenly and randomly for inclination and anteversion. Conclusion: The evaluation of an image-less navigation system in this large study cohort provides accurate and reliable intraoperative feedback. The accuracy and the precision were inferior compared to CT-based navigation systems particularly regarding the anteversion. However the assessed values are certainly within a clinically acceptable range. This use of image-less navigation offers an additional tool to address challenging hip prothesis in the context of the hip−spine relationship to achieve adequate placement of the acetabular components with a minimum of outliers.

Abnormal spinopelvic mobility as a risk factor for acetabular placement error in total hip arthroplasty using optical computer-assisted surgical navigation system

Aims

Navigation devices are designed to improve a surgeon’s accuracy in positioning the acetabular and femoral components in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to both evaluate the accuracy of an optical computer-assisted surgery (CAS) navigation system and determine whether preoperative spinopelvic mobility (categorized as hypermobile, normal, or stiff) increased the risk of acetabular component placement error.

Methods

A total of 356 patients undergoing primary THA were prospectively enrolled from November 2016 to March 2018. Clinically relevant error using the CAS system was defined as a difference of > 5° between CAS and 3D radiological reconstruction measurements for acetabular component inclination and anteversion. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine whether hypermobile ([Formula: see text]sacral slope(SS)stand-sit > 30°), or stiff ([Formula: see text]SSstand-sit < 10°) spinopelvic mobility contributed to increased error rates.

Results

The paired absolute difference between CAS and postoperative imaging measurements was 2.3° (standard deviation (SD) 2.6°) for inclination and 3.1° (SD 4.2°) for anteversion. Using a target zone of 40° (± 10°) (inclination) and 20° (± 10°) (anteversion), postoperative standing radiographs measured 96% of acetabular components within the target zone for both inclination and anteversion. Multiple logistic regression analysis controlling for BMI and sex revealed that hypermobile spinopelvic mobility significantly increased error rates for anteversion (odds ratio (OR) 2.48, p = 0.009) and inclination (OR 2.44, p = 0.016), whereas stiff spinopelvic mobility increased error rates for anteversion (OR 1.97, p = 0.028). There were no dislocations at a minimum three-year follow-up.

Conclusion

Despite high reliability in acetabular positioning for inclination in a large patient cohort using an optical CAS system, hypermobile and stiff spinopelvic mobility significantly increased the risk of clinically relevant errors. In patients with abnormal spinopelvic mobility, CAS systems should be adjusted for use to avoid acetabular component misalignment and subsequent risk for long-term dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(6):475–484.

The role of the femoral component orientation on dislocations in THA: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Dislocation remains a major complication in total hip arthroplasty (THA), in which femoral component orientation is considered a key parameter. New imaging modalities and definitions on femoral component orientation have been introduced, describing orientation in different planes. This study aims to systematically review the relevance of the different orientation parameters on implant stability.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify articles in the PubMed and EMBASE databases that study the relation between any femoral component orientation parameters and implant stability in primary THA.

RESULTS

After screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality assessment, nine articles were included. Definitions to describe the femoral component orientation and methodologies to assess its relevance for implant stability differed greatly, with lack of consensus. Seven retrospective case-control studies reported on the relevance of the transversal plane orientation: Low femoral- or low combined femoral and acetabular anteversion was statistical significantly related with more posterior dislocations, and high femoral- or combined femoral and acetabular anteversion with anterior dislocations in two studies. There were insufficient data on sagittal and coronal component orientation in relation to implant stability.

CONCLUSION

Because of incomparable definitions, limited quality and heterogeneity in methodology of the included studies, there is only weak evidence that the degree of transverse component version is related with implant stability in primary THA. Recommendations about the optimal orientation of the femoral component in all three anatomical planes cannot be provided. Future studies should uniformly define the three-dimensional orientation of the femoral component and systematically describe implant stability.