High Incidence of Tibial Component Loosening After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Ceramic Titanium-Nitride-Coated Mobile Bearing Prosthesis in Moderate to Severe Varus Deformity: A Matched-Pair Study Between Ceramic-Coated Mobile Bearing and Fixed Bearing Prostheses

Comprehensive evaluation of risk factors for aseptic loosening in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Aseptic loosening is the most common cause for revisions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite many studies exploring various risk factors associated with aseptic loosening, findings often present inconsistencies. To address this, we conducted a thorough review of the literature to identify and analyse these risk factors in cemented TKA. Additionally, we performed a meta-analysis to reconcile the divergent conclusions observed across studies.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase from 1996 up to 2024 and evaluated the quality of the included literature. Seventy-four studies were included to assess the association of BMI, diabetes, high physical activity (HPA), osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), cement material and implant design. Twenty-nine studies were used to calculate relative risk and CIs (using the random effects theory) and study heterogeneity for six different risk factors (BMI, diabetes, HPA level, cement material, polyethylene and implant design).

Results

Patients with diabetes are eight times more likely to experience aseptic loosening compared to those without diabetes (RR = 9.18, 95% CI: 1.80-46.77, p < 0.01). The use of tibial stem extension or highly crosslinked polyethylene can help reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening. However, we did not identify BMI, HPA, osteoporosis, RA, the use of high-viscosity cement and the utilization of mobile-bearing designs as risk factors for aseptic loosening post-cemented TKA.

Conclusions

Patients with diabetes undergoing TKA should be counselled regarding their potential increased risk of aseptic loosening. The use of tibial stem extensions and HXLPE can mitigate the incidence of aseptic loosening in cemented TKA. However, given a limited number of studies were included in the meta-analysis, we believe that higher-level studies are necessary to clearly identify other risk factors.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Aseptic survival of the 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection was acceptable when using an autoclaved femoral component and a new polyethylene insert

PURPOSE

To investigate the aseptic survival of 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Eighty-eight cases of 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI without reinfection were retrospectively analysed. The autoclaved femoral component and new polyethylene insert (PE) were implanted using antibiotic mixed cement. The explanted tibial component was not reinserted. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and range of motion were clinically evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up (the last time for the implant in situ). Radiographically, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and component positions were measured preoperatively, postoperatively (1 month after the 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty), and at the last follow-up. The survival rate was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method, in which failure was defined as reoperation due to aseptic failure. Mean period to failure and failure site were analysed. Factors affecting survival were investigated in terms of demographics and inappropriateness of the postoperative HKA (HKA > 0 ± 3°) and component positions (α angle > 95 ± 3°, β angle > 90 ± 3°, γ angle > 3 ± 3°, and δ angle > 87 ± 3°).

RESULTS

The spacer in-situ time was 3.7 years (0.2-6.4). The clinical results improved hip-knee-ankle significantly at the last follow-up. Radiographically, the average HKA was valgus 0.1° postoperatively. The average α, β, γ, and δ angles of the postoperative component positions were 95.9°, 90.4°, 3.8°, and 86.7°, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year postoperative survival rates were 90.9%, 86.4%, and 80.6%, respectively. The mean period to failure was 2.0 years (0.2-5.3). There were 18 cases of aseptic loosening (20.8%), occurring on both the femur and tibial sides in 1 knee, and only on the tibial side in 17 knees. Inappropriate coronal position of the PE (β angle > 90 ± 3°) was a significant factor affecting survival (odds ratio = 5.491; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The aseptic survival of the 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty was acceptable when using an autoclaved femoral component and new PE. The appropriate coronal position of the PE helps ensure favourable survival of 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

"Systematic review and meta-analysis of ceramic coated implants in total knee arthroplasty. Comparable mid-term results to uncoated implants."

BACKGROUND

Nitride-based ceramic coatings, such as titanium nitride (TiN) and titanium niobium nitride (TiNbN), have been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to enhance the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of knee components, harden the metal surface and reduce CoCrMo exposure and metal ion release. However, the theoretical advantages of these ceramic coatings in TKA have yet to be fully elucidated. This systematic review aimed to provide clinical evidence on mid-term outcomes of ceramic-coated knee prostheses in comparison with uncoated standard CoCrMo knee prostheses in primary TKA. The hypothesis was that ceramic-coated implants can be used in primary TKA with no inferior outcomes compared to uncoated CoCrMo implants.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to find all clinical studies regarding primary TKA with ceramic-coated knee prostheses. MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from 1990 to October 2020 to identify relevant studies for the first qualitative analysis. Using PICOS eligibility criteria, a subgroup of the selected studies was used to perform a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were included in the meta-analysis: 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 retrospective comparative studies and 1 prospective cross-sectional study. Pooled data overall included 321 coated TKAs vs. 359 uncoated TKAs and a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 2-10 years). No significant difference in the implant survival risk ratio with revision or reoperation due to any reason was found between coated and uncoated TKAs, even considering the RCT study subgroup with a risk ratio of 1.02 (P = 0.34). No significant differences were found for postoperative complications, clinical scores, or metal blood concentrations at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the statement that ceramic-coated TKAs are not inferior to uncoated TKAs, showing comparable survival rates, complication rates and clinical outcomes. There is strong evidence that ceramic-coated TKA does not improve the clinical results or survival rate in comparison with uncoated TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II,  Therapeutic.

No clinical difference at mid-term follow-up between TiN-coated versus uncoated cemented mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Nitride-based ceramic coating was introduced into surgical implants to improve hardness, reduce abrasion, and decrease the risk of metal-induced adverse reactions, especially for patients with suspected or identified metal hypersensitivity. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a titanium nitride (TiN) coated prosthesis with a mobile bearing design.

METHODS

This was a retrospective matched-cohort study from a single center, comparing clinical outcomes between patients receiving either a TiN-coated versus an uncoated cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) prostheses for primary total knee replacement. Seventeen patients received the TiN prosthesis between 2015 and 2019. These were matched 1:2 with patients receiving uncoated mobile-bearing knee prostheses with the same design manufacturer.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients in the TiN group had complete 5-year follow-up data and were compared with 34 patients from the CoCrMo group. The Knee Society Score was 170.6 ± 28.0 (Function subscore 83.7 ± 17.5 and Knee subscore 86.9 ± 13.8) in the TiN group and 180.7 ± 49.4 (Function subscore 87.5 ± 14.3 and Knee subscore 93.2 ± 9.6) in CoCrMo group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.19). One patient underwent a revision for instability requiring the removal of the implant in the TiN group and none in the CoCrMo group. The survival rates were 92.9% (CI95% 77.3-100.0) and 100.0% in the TiN group and CoCrMo group respectively (p = 1.0).

DISCUSSION

TiN-coated TKA with mobile bearing resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes, and a low revision rate, and there was no complication related to the coated implant. The use of TiN-coated prostheses in case of confirmed or suspected metal allergy provides satisfactory short-term clinic outcomes.

Mobile-Bearing has no Benefit Over Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty in Joint Awareness and Crepitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Given higher component conformity, rotational availability of polyethylene insert, and more physiologic patellofemoral tracking, mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is supposed to offer advantages in joint perception and crepitus. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether MB TKA offers superior outcomes over fixed-bearing (FB) TKA in terms of joint awareness and crepitus.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 49 FB and 49 MB TKAs that shared the same posterior-stabilized femoral component. Primary outcomes included joint awareness assessed with the Forgotten Joint Score and crepitus graded according to severity and sound at 3 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the range of motion, the Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, component position, and joint line level on radiographs.

RESULTS

The Forgotten Joint Score showed no significant difference between the FB (67 points; range, 0-100) and MB groups (63 points; range, 13-100) (P = .440). For crepitus, no significant differences were found in the overall incidence rate (FB group, 18%; MB group, 12%; P = .386) and grade (grade 1, 6 versus 5; grade 2, 2 versus 1; grade 3, 1 versus 0, respectively). There were no significant differences in range of motion, Knee Society Score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, as well as radiographic outcomes between the two groups (all, P > .05).

CONCLUSION

MB TKA offers no benefits in terms of joint awareness and crepitus compared with FB TKA at mean 3 years postoperatively. The theoretical advantages of MB TKA have yet to be demonstrated in practice, leaving the selection of bearing type to the surgeon's judgment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

The mid-term survival of cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty

Background

Till today, Cemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is significantly more used than Hybrid or Uncemented Fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare Cemented, Uncemented and Hybrid Fixation of the ACS Mobile Bearing TKA at Mid-term follow-up.

Methods

This study was an extended data report of our prospective single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial comprising 105 patients. The primary outcome was survival at five years of follow-up calculated by Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank test. The secondary outcome was function based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Results

Eighty-three patients were included, of which 25 belonged into group A (Cemented), 28 in group B (Uncemented), and 30 in group C (Hybrid). Mean follow-up was 5.8 ± 0.7 (range 5-7) years. The 5-year survival rates were 96.8% (95%CI: 90.5; 100) in the Cemented group, 94.2% (95%CI: 86.4; 100) in the Uncemented group, and 93.8% (95%CI: 85.4; 100) in the Hybrid group for revision for any reason (p = 0.80). Functional outcome was similar among the groups.

Conclusion

In our cohort of ACS Mobile Bearing TKA, there was no difference between Cemented, Uncemented, and Hybrid Fixation with regard to survival and function at Mid-term follow-up.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register (NTR3893), 2013-03-12.

Level of evidence

II.

Long-term outcomes were similar between hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees at a minimum 15 years of follow-up

PURPOSE

To compare long-term clinical and radiographic results and survival rates between hybrid and cemented total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed on paired knees.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees with NexGen® cruciate-retaining prostheses were retrospectively reviewed after a minimum 15 years of follow-up. Mean follow-up period was 17.5 years. Preoperative alignment deformity and range of motion (ROM) were not different between groups. The Knee Society score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and ROM were evaluated. Radiographically, change in joint space width, component loosening, and osteolysis were evaluated. Implant survival rate was analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical results between hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees of 72 patients at the last follow-up. No significant difference was observed in the change in joint space width between the two groups at the last follow-up (medial = 0.3 mm vs. 0.4 mm; lateral = 0.1 mm vs. 0.2 mm). One hybrid TKA showed tibial component loosening, for which revision was performed. There was femoral osteolysis in one hybrid and one cemented TKA, and tibial osteolysis in eight hybrid TKAs and seven cemented TKAs (n.s., respectively). The 20-year survival rate was 97.7% for hybrid TKAs and 100% for cemented TKAs (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The long-term outcomes were similar between hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees at a minimum 15 years of follow-up. The method of femoral component fixation did not have a significant effect on long-term TKA success.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Alkali-Treated Alumina and Zirconia Powders Decorated with Hydroxyapatite for Prospective Biomedical Applications

The alumina and zirconia surfaces were pretreated with chemical etching using alkaline mixtures of ammonia, hydrogen peroxide and sodium hydroxide, and followed with application of the powder layer of Ca-deficient hydroxyapatite (CDH). The influence of etching bath conditions time and concentration on surface development, chemical composition and morphology of medicinal ceramic powders were studied. The following analyses were performed: morphology (scanning electron microscopy), phase composition (X-ray diffraction analysis), changes in binding interactions and chemical composition (FT-Infrared and Energy dispersive spectroscopies). Both types of etchants did not expose the original phase composition changes or newly created phases for both types of ceramics. Subsequent decoration of the surface with hydroxyapatite revealed differences in the morphological appearance of the layer on both ceramic surfaces. The treated zirconia surface accepted CDH as a flowing layer on the surface, while the alumina was decorated with individual CDH aggregates. The goal of this study was to focus further on the ceramic fillers for polymer-ceramic composites used as a biomaterial in dental prosthetics.

The use of mobile bearing TKA in valgus deformities - A clinical study

BACKGROUND

The number of patients presenting valgus deformities undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) represents approximately 10% of the total number of TKAs performed: the presence of valgus deformity requires the implant to have proper alignment, stability and balance to achieve successful clinical outcomes, especially for knees with high coronal deformities, but these have proven to be difficult goals to achieve and therefore the use of constrained prostheses is often recommended for these cases. However, even though the use of unconstrained mobile bearing for severe knee deformities is rare, it has been shown to give successful outcomes and therefore the aim of this study is to evaluate whether this surgical technique can achieve satisfactory clinical results and correct alignment, as well as good patient satisfaction.

METHODS

This study presents the results of 69 TKA performed with cemented mobile bearing implants by a single surgeon on knee affected by valgus deformities. Asymmetric inserts were adopted for all the implants and an alignment surgical tool, dedicated for valgus patients, was used during the operation. Angles of valgus, WOMAC surveys and Numeric Rating Scale for pain were recorded to evaluate the results of the operations.

RESULTS

A total of 67 pre-op WOMAC questionnaire surveys were collected, with the mean result of this evaluation being 15.9 points. The Numeric Rating Scale for pain had an average of 2.2 for 68 tests. The deformities were corrected from a mean total preoperative valgus angle of 12.5° to a postoperative valgus deformity average of 0.6°. During follow-up, only one patient had serious complications due to the rupture of the extensor apparatus following a domestic accident involving falling. Further 10 patients have mild complications related to injuries such as pain of varying intensity, burning, or swelling of the knee. The level of satisfaction from 0 to 10 (0 not at all satisfied and 10 perfectly satisfied) had an average score of 7.7.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical approach presented, involving a less constrained model if compared to the ones usually chosen, allowed to achieve correct alignment and high patient satisfaction using mobile bearing implants on valgus knee deformities; further patient follow-up will be performed to evaluate long-term outcomes, but the results achieved already represent a significative finding.

No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Both mobile (MB) and fixed (FB) bearing implants are routinely used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This meta-analysis compared MB versus FB for TKA in terms of implant positioning, joint function, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and complications. It was hypothesised that MB performs better than FB implants in primary TKA.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. In February 2022, the following databases were accessed: Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase. All the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing mobile versus fixed bearing for primary TKA were considered.

RESULTS

Data from 74 RCTs (11,116 procedures) were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 58.8 (7.5 to 315.6) months. The MB group demonstrated greater range of motion (ROM) (P = 0.02), Knee Society Score (KSS) score (P < 0.0001), and rate of deep infections (P = 0.02). No difference was found in implant positioning: tibial slope, delta angle, alpha femoral component angle, gamma femoral component angle, beta tibial component angle, tibiofemoral alignment angle, posterior condylar offset, radiolucent lines. No difference was found in duration of the surgical procedure. No difference was found in the following PROMs: Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale (VAS), function and pain subscales of the KSS score. No difference was found in the rate of anterior knee pain, revision, aseptic loosening, fractures, and deep vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence in support that MB implants promote greater outcomes compared to FB implants in primary TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty : a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach

AIMS

Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase, from their inception to November 2020, for studies evaluating TKA patients with metal hypersensitivity/allergy. All studies reporting on diagnosing or managing metal hypersensitivity in TKA were included. Data were extracted and summarized based on study design, study population, interventions and outcomes. A practical guide is then formulated based on the available evidence.

RESULTS

We included 38 heterogeneous studies (two randomized controlled trials, six comparative studies, 19 case series, and 11 case reports). The evidence indicates that metal hypersensitivity is a rare complication with some histopathological features leading to pain and dissatisfaction with no reliable screening tests preoperatively. Hypoallergenic implants are viable alternatives for patients with self-reported/confirmed metal hypersensitivity if declared preoperatively; however, concerns remain over their long-term outcomes with ceramic implants outperforming titanium nitride-coated implants and informed consent is paramount. For patients presenting with painful TKA, metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion where patch skin testing, lymphocyte transformation test, and synovial biopsies are useful adjuncts before revision surgery is undertaken to hypoallergenic implants with shared decision-making and informed consent.

CONCLUSION

Using the limited available evidence in the literature, we provide a practical approach to metal hypersensitivity in TKA patients. Future national/registry-based studies are needed to identify the scale of metal hypersensitivity, agreed diagnostic criteria, and management strategies. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):785-795.

A Current Prosthesis With a 1-mm Thickness Increment for Polyethylene Insert Could Result in Fewer Adjustments of Posterior Tibial Slope in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

To compare posterior tibial slope (PTS) and incidence of excessive PTS between cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with the current prosthesis, providing a 1-mm increment of polyethylene insert thickness, and its predecessor, providing a 2-mm increment.

METHODS

Each of 154 CR TKAs with Persona (current group) and NexGen (predecessor group) prostheses with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative demographics, including age, sex, and body mass index, were similar. Factors affecting the flexion gap were matched in terms of preoperative range of motion, mechanical axis, PTS, preoperative and postoperative posterior femoral offset (PFO), and PFO ratio. The PTS was evaluated radiographically. The incidence of excessive PTS (PTS > 10°) and the frequency of intraoperative PTS-increasing procedures were investigated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative range of motion, mechanical axis, PFO, and PFO ratios between the 2 groups. The preoperative PTS was not significantly different, but the postoperative PTS was significantly lower in the current group (4.6° vs 6.2°, P < .001). There was no case of excessive PTS in the current group, but there were 9 cases (5.8%) in the predecessor group (P = .030). The intraoperative PTS-increasing procedure was performed more frequently in the predecessor group (12.3% vs 21.4%, P = .047).

CONCLUSION

The current prosthesis providing a 1-mm increment of polyethylene insert thickness could decrease the PTS and the occurrence of excessive PTS in CR TKA. The target angle for PTS can be decreased in TKA using the current prosthesis in comparison with its predecessor.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Ten-year outcomes of a nitrided Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy fixed-bearing total knee replacement with a highly crosslinked polyethylene-bearing in patients with metal allergy

BACKGROUND

Metal hypersensitivity in patients with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare condition and a very controversial topic. Despite the lack of data concerning the real effective impact of allergy on TKA failures, most of the manufactures offer the choice of 'non-allergenic' implants both for primary and revision TKA, some of which provide the same designs and surgical techniques as the conventional ones. Only a few studies are available on outcomes on these 'hypersensitivity-friendly' implants and even fewer specifically on allergic patients with a mid- to long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2015, we enrolled 72 patients (57 females, 15 males), who underwent TKA treated with a non-allergenic posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee implant for a declared and proven metal allergy. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean 10 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

With revision as an endpoint the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate showed a survival rate of 97.2% at five years and 95.1% at 10 years. Significant improvements in range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Scoring (KSS) and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores were registered at final follow-up (P < 0.0001). At final follow-up validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) showed the following scores: Oxford Knee Score (OKS) 42.1, EQ5D 0.80, EQ VAS 80.1, Forgotten Joint Score 71.2.

CONCLUSIONS

This nitrided Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy fixed-bearing total knee replacement with a highly crosslinked polyethylene-bearing showed interesting results and survival rates in patients with metal allergy at mid- to long-term follow-up.