Intra-articular Injections of the Hip and Knee With Triamcinolone vs Ketorolac: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A Scoping Review of Clinical Studies on Procedures of Ultrasound-Guided Injection to Ensure Hygiene and Safety

Background: Ultrasound guidance is widely used to enhance injection accuracy and safety. However, ultrasound-guided procedures require complex manipulation of both probe and needle. This simultaneous manipulation while maintaining sterility necessitates specific infection prevention protocols. This scoping review aimed to systematically investigate hygiene and safety procedures reported in clinical studies of ultrasound-guided injections. Methods: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guideline, we conducted a systematic search of four databases (two English and two Korean) from inception to November 2023. Studies describing ultrasound-guided injection procedures with skin disinfection protocols were included. The extracted procedures were categorized and analyzed according to their timing (before, during, and after injection) and purpose. Results: Among 1728 studies identified, 86 met inclusion criteria. Notable variations were found in infection prevention practices, with only 5.81% reporting probe disinfection procedures and 27.91% documenting sterile probe cover use. Skin disinfection methods also varied, with iodophors (20.93%) and alcohol-based solutions (11.63%) being most common. Of studies describing ultrasound coupling agent procedures (26.74%), less than 20% specifically mentioned using sterile transmission agents. Documentation of temporal aspects of infection prevention was limited, with most studies not addressing precise timing of disinfection procedures or post-procedure probe reprocessing protocols. Conclusions: Our findings reveal considerable variation in infection prevention practices during ultrasound-guided injections and highlight gaps in documentation of hygiene protocols. These findings suggest the need for standardized, evidence-based protocols tailored to different anatomical sites and types of injections. Further research through expert consensus and real-world implementation is needed to develop and validate comprehensive guidelines for clinical practice.

Pain management of hip osteoarthritis with corticosteroids vs injection therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common degenerative joint disease, characterized by chronic pain and articular cartilage damage. Hip OA is characterized by the progressive breakdown of articular cartilage within the hip, particularly the hip joints ball and socket structure, Hip OA leads to joint pain, stiffness and causes functional limitations.

AIM

To analyse the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroids (IA CS) use against other injection therapies for the symptomatic management of hip OA.

METHODS

PROSPERO registered-CRD42024526221. Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for trials.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Adults with symptomatic hip OA, randomised trials for treatment of hip OA with IA injection methods. Studies must involve comparators and the outcome measure must include a measurement of pain such as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) or the visual analogue scale (VAS). Cochrane risk of bias and JBI critical appraisal tools assessed risk of bias. RevMan was used for creation of statistical figures within the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Data extracted in the systematic review presented improvements on pain, function, stiffness, and overall scores using WOMAC and VAS scales. However, data from the meta-analysis indicates that there is no statistical significance (significance is a p value < 0.05) between corticosteroids and placebo or hyaluronic acid (HA). Meta-analyses produced p values of 0.05 when comparing CS and placebo WOMAC pain scores at 2 months, CS and HA overall WOMAC at 6 months-p value of 0.46. WOMAC stiffness and function scores between CS and placebo at 2 months-p value of 0.05 and 0.08, thus statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows that IA corticosteroid injections for hip OA don't provide statistically significant symptomatic improvement for patients compared to placebo. Showing the urgent need to assess other therapies in hip OA treatment.

Impact of Adequate Disinfection Techniques for Ultrasound-Guided Injections in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

Background: Interventional physiatry is a branch of medicine that uses minimally invasive ultrasound-guided techniques for diagnosis and treatment in the musculoskeletal system. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the sterilisation techniques used and the rate of infection with ultrasound-guided injections. Methods: PubMed was searched up to 30 September 2024 using the following search terms ("Ultrasound, Interventional"[mesh]) AND "Injections, Intra-Articular"[mesh]; "Ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection". The inclusion criteria were randomised clinical trials, written in English, involving US-guided mini-invaexercissive procedures. Results: The search identified a total of 256 potentially relevant publications. After screening for duplication, inclusion, and exclusion criteria, 105 articles were eligible for data extraction. In 51 studies, the method of skin disinfection was not specified, 18 RCT reported a 'sterile condition', 9 studies used povidone-iodine solution, 5 used alcohol, and 2 used chlorhexidine 0.5%. In 64 trials, the method of probe preparation was not specified, 11 trials described the use of sterile gel, 10 trials reported the use of a probe cover, sterile pad, or barrier, and 2 trials reported the use of chlorhexidine 0.5%; 41 studies reported mild adverse events and 4 serious adverse events. Conclusions: Taken together, the findings of this scoping review did not show a clear relationship between current sterilisation protocols and the prevention of the microbial contamination of the probes or the patient's skin. The variation in protocols highlights the need for standardised guidelines and more rigorous studies to accurately determine the most effective disinfection practices.

Use and safety of corticosteroid injections in joints and musculoskeletal soft tissue: guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, and the International Pain and Spine Intervention Society

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular corticosteroid (IACS) injection and peri-articular corticosteroid injection are commonly used to treat musculoskeletal conditions. Results vary by musculoskeletal region, but most studies report short-term benefit with mixed results on long-term relief. Publications showed adverse events from single corticosteroid injections. Recommended effective doses were lower than those currently used by clinicians.

METHODS

Development of the practice guideline for joint injections was approved by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the participating societies. A Corticosteroid Safety Work Group coordinated the development of three guidelines: peripheral nerve blocks and trigger points; joints; and neuraxial, facet, and sacroiliac joint injections. The topics included safety of the technique in relation to landmark-guided, ultrasound-guided, or radiology-aided injections; effect of the addition of the corticosteroid on the efficacy of the injectate; and adverse events related to the injection. Experts on the topics were assigned to extensively review the literature and initially develop consensus statements and recommendations. A modified version of the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence and strength of recommendation was followed. A modified Delphi process was adhered to in arriving at a consensus.

RESULTS

This guideline focuses on the safety and efficacy of corticosteroid joint injections for managing joint chronic pain in adults. The joints that were addressed included the shoulder, elbow, hand, wrist, hip, knee, and small joints of the hands and feet. All the statements and recommendations were approved by all participants and the Board of Directors of the participating societies after four rounds of discussion. There is little evidence to guide the selection of one corticosteroid over another. Ultrasound guidance increases the accuracy of injections and reduces procedural pain. A dose of 20 mg triamcinolone is as effective as 40 mg for both shoulder IACS and subacromial subdeltoid bursa corticosteroid injections. The commonly used dose for hip IACS is 40 mg triamcinolone or methylprednisolone. Triamcinolone 40 mg is as effective as 80 mg for knee IACS. Overall, IACS injections result in short-term pain relief from a few weeks to a few months. The adverse events include an increase in blood glucose, adrenal suppression, detrimental effect on cartilage lining the joint, reduction of bone mineral density, and postoperative joint infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In this practice guideline, we provided specific recommendations on the role of corticosteroids in joint, bursa, and peritendon injections for musculoskeletal pain.

In Patients With Painful Hip Osteoarthritis, Is It More Beneficial to Offer Them an Ultrasound-Guided or a Fluoroscopic-Guided Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection to Relieve Their Symptoms? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling musculoskeletal condition. Clinical guidelines recommend intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSI) as a pharmacological adjunct to help manage pain. IACSI are typically image-guided either by ultrasound guidance (USG) or fluoroscopic guidance (FG) with no clear evidence towards the more efficacious guidance technique. This study aims to systematically review the scientific literature to determine the clinical effectiveness of USG compared with FG-IACSIs for people with pain-related hip OA.

METHODS

A systematic review of major bibliographic databases from inception to 24 August 2023 was conducted. Randomised controlled trials of USG- and FG-IACSIs for patients with hip OA were included. The primary outcome measure was pain. Hedges' g calculated effect size and meta-analysis using the random-effects model-estimated pooled effect sizes. τ2, I2 and Cochran's Q calculated heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis was completed to indirectly compare effect sizes. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).

RESULTS

A total of 1464 citations were identified; eight studies were included in the review. No studies directly compared imaging modalities. Two network meta-analyses indirectly comparing USG- to FG-IACSI via an image-guided comparator hip injection ([any comparator], [local anaesthetic or saline]) established effect sizes (g) of 2.61 and 2.46, respectively, both in favour of FG-IACSI. Heterogeneity was low in the USG studies and high in the FG studies.

CONCLUSION(S)

Evidence suggests that both USG and FG-IACSI are effective at reducing pain at 1 month in patients with painful hip OA. Although network meta-analyses favoured FG-IACSI, further high-quality trials are needed to determine the preferred guidance technique.

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Injections versus Steroid Injections in the Management of Upper and Lower Extremity Orthopedic Conditions: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although corticosteroid injections are an effective treatment for musculoskeletal pathologies, they may not be suitable for all patients. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare clinical outcomes between patients who received NSAID and corticosteroid injections for various orthopedic conditions.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, and meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model for outcomes presented in three or more studies. Other studies were qualitatively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 28 articles with 2113 patients were included. A meta-analysis of five studies in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) between subacromial NSAID injections and corticosteroid injections at 1 month [weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.244; 95% CI, -1.232 to 0.745; I2, 94.5%]. For patients with knee osteoarthritis, a meta-analysis of three studies demonstrated that there was no significant difference between intraarticular NSAID injections and corticosteroid injections in pain VAS at 1 month (WMD 0.754; 95% CI, -0.413 to 1.921; I2, 90.2%) and 3 months (WMD-0.089; 95% CI, -0.345 to 0.166; I2, 0%). A review of the studies assessing pain outcomes for hip osteoarthritis, adhesive capsulitis, and plantar fasciitis showed no significant differences between the NSAID and corticosteroid groups.

CONCLUSION

NSAID injections may be safe and effective alternatives to steroid injections, especially in shoulder impingement syndrome and knee osteoarthritis.

Incidence of Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis Following Intra-articular Hip Corticosteroid Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery recommends intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSIs) for managing hip osteoarthritis (OA) based on short-term, prospective studies. Recent retrospective studies have raised concerns that CSIs may lead to rapidly progressive OA (RPOA). We sought to systematically review the literature of CSIs for hip OA to estimate the incidence of RPOA.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify original research of hip OA patients receiving CSIs. Overall, 27 articles involving 5831 patients published from 1988 to 2022 were included. Study design, patient characteristics, CSI details, follow-up, and cases of RPOA were recorded. Studies were classified by their ability to detect RPOA based on follow-up. Random effects meta-analysis was used to calculate the incidence of RPOA for studies able to detect RPOA.

Results

The meta-analytic estimate of RPOA incidence was 6% (95% confidence interval, 3%-9%) based on 10 articles classified as able to detect RPOA. RPOA definitions varied from progression of OA within 6 months to the presence of destructive changes. These studies were subject to bias from excluding patients with missing post-CSI radiographs. The remaining 17 articles were classified as unable to detect RPOA, including all of the studies cited in the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery recommendation.

Conclusions

The incidence of RPOA after CSIs remains unknown due to variation in definitions and follow-up. While RPOA following CSIs may be 6%, many cases are not severe, and this may reflect selection bias. Further research is needed to understand whether clinically significant RPOA is incident enough to limit CSI use.

Outcomes of imaging-guided corticosteroid injections in hip and knee osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature on the use of image-guided corticosteroid injections in the treatment of patients with knee and hip OA.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a comprehensive literature search through June 30, 2022. Publication type, study design, imaging guidance modality, osteoarthritis severity, number of injections, steroid type and dose, anesthetic type and dose, the total number of patients, follow-up intervals, and measured outcomes were extracted from the included studies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

There were 23 included studies (10 hips, 12 knees, 1 both hip and knee). Hip injections were found to be effective in treating short- and long-term pain and more effective than hyaluronic acid, Mepivacaine, NSAIDs, and normal saline in terms of improvement in pain and/or function. There was less impact on QoL. Knee injections were found either to have little or no impact or were similar or inferior to comparison injections (intra-articular hyaluronic acid, PRP, NSAIDs, normal saline, adductor canal blocks). Study data could not be aggregated because the corticosteroid types and doses, methods of outcome assessment, and follow-up time points varied widely.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review found generally positive outcomes for the hip, but overall negative outcomes for the knee, although hip injections may carry a risk of serious adverse outcomes. A larger trial with uniform methodology is warranted. Specific studies on the adverse effects of corticosteroid injections are also warranted.

Reduction of systemic exposure and side effects by intra-articular injection of anti-inflammatory agents for osteoarthritis: what is the safer strategy?

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative joint disease associated with pain, inflammation, and cartilage degradation. However, no current treatment can effectively halt the progression of the disease. Therefore, the use of NSAIDs and intra-articular corticosteroids is usually recommended as the primary treatment for OA-associated pain and inflammation. However, there is accumulating evidence that the long-term use of oral NSAIDs and intra-articular corticosteroids can lead to a myriad of negative side effects. Although numerous efforts have been made to develop intra-articular formulations for NSAIDs, the systemic exposure of intra-articular injection of NSAIDs and its potential side effects have not been explicitly investigated. To ascertain the evident and potential side effects of intra-articular injection of anti-inflammatory agents, we have summarised in this review the systemic exposure, local side effects, and systemic side effects of intra-articular injections of anti-inflammatory agents, including NSAIDs and corticosteroids. For developing a safer treatment to fulfil the unmet long-term use needs of patients, a new therapy, which combines the locally active drug and a sustained-release formulation, has been proposed in this review.

Osteoarthritis year in review 2022: epidemiology & therapy

This 'Year in Review' provides a synopsis of key research themes and individual studies from the clinical osteoarthritis (OA) field, focused on epidemiology and therapy. The electronic database search for the review was adapted from the 2021 year in review search, to increase search specificity for relevant study designs, and was conducted in Medline, Embase and medRxiv (31^st March 2021 to 4^th March 2022). Following screening for eligibility, studies were grouped according to their key research design, including reviews, cohorts and randomised trials. 11 key themes emerged, including the importance of several comorbidities in predicting OA incidence and prevalence, surgical approaches that can reduce the risk of post-traumatic OA, the heterogenous but nevertheless relatively stable nature of OA subgroup trajectories, the paucity of robust studies particularly of surgery for OA and the very modest benefit of many therapies under evaluation in trials. A particular interest of the authors was to consider whether new studies are helping determine how to better ensure the right patient with OA is matched to the right treatment at the right time. There are several new studies developing improved predictive models through big data analytics and machine learning which show promise, need validation, and may support new approaches to stratified care.

Ketorolac-Loaded PLGA-/PLA-Based Microparticles Stabilized by Hyaluronic Acid: Effects of Formulation Composition and Emulsification Technique on Particle Characteristics and Drug Release Behaviors

This study aimed to develop ketorolac microparticles stabilized by hyaluronic acid based on poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), poly(lactide) (PLA), and their blend for further application in osteoarthritis. The polymer blend may provide tailored drug release and improved physicochemical characteristics. The microparticles were prepared by water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) double emulsion solvent evaporation using two emulsification techniques, probe sonication (PS) and high-speed stirring (HSS), to obtain the microparticles in different size ranges. The results revealed that the polymer composition and emulsification technique influenced the ketorolac microparticle characteristics. The PS technique provided significantly at least 20 times smaller average size (1.3-2.2 µm) and broader size distribution (1.5-8.5) than HSS (45.5-67.4 µm and 1.0-1.4, respectively). The encapsulation efficiency was influenced by the polymer composition and the emulsification technique, especially in the PLA microparticles. The DSC and XRD results suggested that the drug was compatible with and molecularly dissolved in the polymer matrix. Furthermore, most of the drug molecules existed in an amorphous form, and some in any crystalline form. All of the microparticles had biphasic drug release composed of the burst release within the first 2 h and the sustained release over 35 days. The obtained microparticles showed promise for further use in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Mechanisms of the Bushen Huoxue formula in the treatment of osteoarthritis based on network pharmacology-molecular targets

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis is a common degenerative disease with a high incidence, high disability rate, and poor prognosis. Clinical studies have shown that Bushen Huoxue formula can relieve joint swelling and pain and improve limb function and joint mobility, but there is a lack of high-quality scientific basis. Using network pharmacology and molecular docking technology to study the mechanism of Bushen Huoxue formula in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

METHODS

First, the active ingredients and corresponding target predictions of the formula were obtained through the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Meanwhile, the osteoarthritis disease targets were obtained through the genome annotation database platform (GeneCards) and the DrugBank database, and the target proteins obtained above were standardized using the Uniprot (https://www.uniprot.org) database standardization of names. Then, the Venn diagram was created by taking the intersection of the active ingredient and the target of the disease, and the "active ingredient-target" network was constructed and analyzed using Cytoscape 3.7.2 software. At the same time, the intersecting targets were imported into the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interaction Gene/Proteins database to build a protein-protein interaction network and to screen the core targets; the intersecting targets were visualized by using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery 6.8 database for gene ontology functional analysis and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis, and construct the "active ingredient-target-pathway" network. Finally, the main active ingredients of the formula for tonifying the kidney and invigorating the blood were validated by molecular docking with the core targets.

RESULTS

A total of 194 active ingredients and 365 targets of the Bushen Huoxue formula were collected, 776 targets for osteoarthritis diseases and 96 targets for the intersection of active ingredients and diseases. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis yielded 104 relevant pathways, including tumor necrosis factor signaling pathways, cancer signaling pathways, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor signaling pathways, Toll-like receptors signaling pathways, and osteoclast differentiation, apoptosis, T-cell receptor signaling pathway, and other related pathways. The molecular docking results showed good binding of the main active ingredients to the core targets.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the treatment of osteoarthritis involves multicomponent, multitarget, and multipathway processes. The mechanism of anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, inhibition of cartilage matrix degradation, and reduction of subchondral bone destruction may be an important mechanism for the therapeutic effect.

Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of intra-articular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis: A narrative review

What is known and Objective

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of joint disease and activity limitation in adults. Common therapies to treat OA‐related pain are oral and topical non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and intra‐articular (IA) corticosteroids. However, prolonged courses of oral NSAIDs are associated with systemic adverse effects and repeat IA corticosteroid injections may cause cartilage degeneration. IA NSAIDs may be an alternative therapy possibly minimizing systemic side effects while maintaining efficacy. Therefore, we sought to summarize the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of IA NSAIDs to help providers make a more informed decision on the use of IA NSAIDs.

Methods

We searched the National Library of Medicine Database with terms “intraarticular and nsaid”, yielding 1032 results. Only traditional formulations of NSAIDs were considered for inclusion. Animal studies were included if animals were healthy or if the method of arthritis induction was a reasonable model of osteoarthritis. Human studies were included if humans were healthy or if the primary disease studied was osteoarthritis of a large joint. Of 1032 results, 31 research articles met the inclusion criteria and were summarized in this review.

Results and Discussion

We found that single doses of IA NSAIDs provided far less total systemic and synovial exposure compared to a one week course of oral NSAIDs, but maximum concentrations to the synovium with IA administration were much higher. IA NSAIDs had an excellent safety profile in small animals, large animals and humans, although these injections were associated with non‐specific cartilage inflammation in healthy animals. In animal models, IA NSAIDs had similar efficacy to PO NSAIDs in treating OA‐related pain. In humans, IA NSAIDs had similar efficacy to PO NSAIDS and IA corticosteroids in treating OA‐related pain; however, many trials did not have a placebo control and outcome measures were heterogeneous.

What is new and Conclusion

Overall, single doses of IA NSAIDs appear safe and efficacious across animals and humans. The optimal use of IA NSAIDs is still to be determined and further research is needed. However IA NSAIDs may be an additional beneficial therapy to treat OA‐related pain. Potential uses may be to augment IA corticosteroids injections, to interrupt multiple IA corticosteroid injections or as an alternative in patients that are high risk for corticosteroid‐related adverse events.

Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part IV, hip

OBJECTIVES

Image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures around the hip are widely used in daily clinical practice. The need for clarity concerning the actual added value of imaging guidance and types of medications to be offered led the Ultrasound and the Interventional Subcommittees of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) to promote, with the support of its Research Committee, a collaborative project to review the published literature on image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the lower limb in order to derive a list of clinical indications.

METHODS

In this article, we report the results of a Delphi-based consensus of 53 experts who reviewed the published literature for evidence on image-guided interventional procedures offered in the joint and soft tissues around the hip in order of their clinical indications.

RESULTS

Ten statements concerning image-guided treatment procedures around the hip have been collected by the panel of ESSR experts.

CONCLUSIONS

This work highlighted that there is still low evidence in the existing literature on some of these interventional procedures. Further large prospective randomized trials are essential to better confirm the benefits and objectively clarify the role of imaging to guide musculoskeletal interventional procedures around the hip.

KEY POINTS

• Expert consensus produced a list of 10 evidence-based statements on clinical indications of image-guided interventional procedures around the hip. • The highest level of evidence was only reached for one statement. • Strong consensus was obtained for all statements.

New developments in osteoarthritis pharmacological therapies

OA is an increasingly common, painful condition with complex aetiology and limited therapies. Approaches to expanding our therapeutic armamentarium have included repurposing existing therapies used for other rheumatological conditions, modifying existing OA preparations to enhance their benefits, and identifying new therapeutics. HCQ and low-dose MTX have been unsuccessful in improving hand OA pain or reducing structural progression. Anti-IL-6 and anti-GM-CSF also did not improve symptoms in hand OA trials, but IL-1 remains an intriguing target for large-joint OA, based on reduced joint replacements in a post hoc analysis from a large cardiovascular disease trial. The peripheral nociceptive pathway appears an attractive target, with mAbs to nerve growth factor and IA capsaicin demonstrating efficacy; tropomyosin receptor kinase A inhibitors are at an earlier stage of development. Limited evidence suggests pharmacological therapies can modify cartilage and bone structural progression, though evidence of synchronous symptom benefits are lacking.

State of art in intra-articular hip injections of different medications for osteoarthritis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular hip injections for osteoarthritis represent a useful instrument to reduce pain and disability in the common clinical practice. Several medications can be injected locally with different level of evidence-based efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of intra-articular injections of different medications or substances for the pain treatment and the management of disability in subjects affected by hip osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Two reviewers selected independently randomised controlled trials published in the last 10 years, using PubMed and Scopus databases. The risk of bias was evaluated with Cochrane library assessment tool.

RESULTS

12 randomised controlled trials have been selected. We found 8 papers comparing hyaluronic acid with platelet rich plasma, with corticosteroids and with saline solution; 1 paper compares two types of hyaluronic acid with different molecular weights; 3 papers study the effects of corticosteroids alone or compared to ketorolac or saline solution.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies reviewed were heterogeneous regarding sample size, level of osteoarthritis, evaluated with Kellegren-Lawrence score, medications used and follow up timings. However, we have observed that intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma seem to decrease pain at short term and disability at long term, in patients affected by hip osteoarthritis better than hyaluronic acid. The association of hyaluronic acid and corticosteroids could give better results compared to hyaluronic acid alone, while the use of intra-articular ketorolac and saline solution requires more studies.