1
|
Pahlevani M, Taghavi M, Vanberkel P. A systematic literature review of predicting patient discharges using statistical methods and machine learning. Health Care Manag Sci 2024:10.1007/s10729-024-09682-7. [PMID: 39037567 DOI: 10.1007/s10729-024-09682-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
Discharge planning is integral to patient flow as delays can lead to hospital-wide congestion. Because a structured discharge plan can reduce hospital length of stay while enhancing patient satisfaction, this topic has caught the interest of many healthcare professionals and researchers. Predicting discharge outcomes, such as destination and time, is crucial in discharge planning by helping healthcare providers anticipate patient needs and resource requirements. This article examines the literature on the prediction of various discharge outcomes. Our review discovered papers that explore the use of prediction models to forecast the time, volume, and destination of discharged patients. Of the 101 reviewed papers, 49.5% looked at the prediction with machine learning tools, and 50.5% focused on prediction with statistical methods. The fact that knowing discharge outcomes in advance affects operational, tactical, medical, and administrative aspects is a frequent theme in the papers studied. Furthermore, conducting system-wide optimization, predicting the time and destination of patients after discharge, and addressing the primary causes of discharge delay in the process are among the recommendations for further research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Pahlevani
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, 5269 Morris Street, Halifax, B3H 4R2, NS, Canada
| | - Majid Taghavi
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, 5269 Morris Street, Halifax, B3H 4R2, NS, Canada
- Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary's University, 923 Robie, Halifax, B3H 3C3, NS, Canada
| | - Peter Vanberkel
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, 5269 Morris Street, Halifax, B3H 4R2, NS, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
D'Ambrosi R, Milinkovic DD, Migliorini F, Mariani I, Ursino N, Hewett T. Learning curve of Persona Partial Knee (PPK) arthroplasty: a clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:128. [PMID: 38341539 PMCID: PMC10858461 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07215-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures are considered to be more technically demanding than conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA), requiring a longer learning curve and more expert surgical skills. Despite some clear advantages of UKA over TKA (such as lesser blood loss, greater bone stock, greater knee performances, etc.), UKA evidenced a greater rate of revision. OBJECT This study investigated the learning curve of Persona Partial Knee (PPK) arthroplasty for primary medial UKA performed by a single, non-designer surgeon. PPK is a fixed-bearing, compartment-specific implant. The primary outcome of interest for this study was to evaluate the learning curve of the surgical duration. The secondary outcome of interest was to evaluate the learning curve of radiological implant positioning. METHODS Patients who underwent primary medial UKA using PPK (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw IN, USA) were prospectively enrolled for the study. All surgeries were performed by a single, non-designer surgeon experienced in knee and hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome of interest was to evaluate the surgical duration. The secondary outcome of interest was to evaluate the implant positioning. The learning curve was estimated using an appropriate nonlinear polynomial regression model with a lower Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). RESULTS One hundred twenty five patients were enrolled in the study. 59% of them (74 of 125 patients) were women. The patients' mean age at the time of surgery was 70.1 ± 9.5 years and their mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.8 ± 4.2 kg/m2. Curve stabilisation of the surgical time was at the 94th patient, of the tibial angle at the 47th patient, of the tibial slope at the 54th patient, of the anterior protrusion at the 29th patient, and of the posterior protrusion at the 51st patient. CONCLUSIONS The learning curve for component positioning was achieved in approximately 50 cases. The curve of the surgical time achieved a plateau at 94 Persona Partial Knee. Additionally, the factors directly correlated with earlier stabilization of the learning curve in terms of component positioning were: male gender, younger age, right side, and larger components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo D'Ambrosi
- IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche Per La Salute, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Danko Dan Milinkovic
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Arcus Sportclinic, Pforzheim, Germany
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Medical Centre, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, 39100, Bolzano, Italy.
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Michelsen C, Jørgensen CC, Heltberg M, Jensen MH, Lucchetti A, Petersen PB, Petersen T, Kehlet H, Madsen F, Hansen TB, Gromov K, Jakobsen T, Varnum C, Overgaard S, Rathsach M, Hansen L. Machine-learning vs. logistic regression for preoperative prediction of medical morbidity after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty-a comparative study. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:391. [PMID: 38030979 PMCID: PMC10685559 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02354-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Machine-learning models may improve prediction of length of stay (LOS) and morbidity after surgery. However, few studies include fast-track programs, and most rely on administrative coding with limited follow-up and information on perioperative care. This study investigates potential benefits of a machine-learning model for prediction of postoperative morbidity in fast-track total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS Cohort study in consecutive unselected primary THA/TKA between 2014-2017 from seven Danish centers with established fast-track protocols. Preoperative comorbidity and prescribed medication were recorded prospectively and information on length of stay and readmissions was obtained through the Danish National Patient Registry and medical records. We used a machine-learning model (Boosted Decision Trees) based on boosted decision trees with 33 preoperative variables for predicting "medical" morbidity leading to LOS > 4 days or 90-days readmissions and compared to a logistical regression model based on the same variables. We also evaluated two parsimonious models, using the ten most important variables in the full machine-learning and logistic regression models. Data collected between 2014-2016 (n:18,013) was used for model training and data from 2017 (n:3913) was used for testing. Model performances were analyzed using precision, area under receiver operating (AUROC) and precision recall curves (AUPRC), as well as the Mathews Correlation Coefficient. Variable importance was analyzed using Shapley Additive Explanations values. RESULTS Using a threshold of 20% "risk-patients" (n:782), precision, AUROC and AUPRC were 13.6%, 76.3% and 15.5% vs. 12.4%, 74.7% and 15.6% for the machine-learning and logistic regression model, respectively. The parsimonious machine-learning model performed better than the full logistic regression model. Of the top ten variables, eight were shared between the machine-learning and logistic regression models, but with a considerable age-related variation in importance of specific types of medication. CONCLUSION A machine-learning model using preoperative characteristics and prescriptions slightly improved identification of patients in high-risk of "medical" complications after fast-track THA and TKA compared to a logistic regression model. Such algorithms could help find a manageable population of patients who may benefit most from intensified perioperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Michelsen
- The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoffer C Jørgensen
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital of Northern Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29 3400, Hillerød, Denmark.
- The Centre for Fast-Track Hip and Knee Replacement, 7621, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Mathias Heltberg
- The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mogens H Jensen
- The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alessandra Lucchetti
- The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pelle B Petersen
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital of Northern Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29 3400, Hillerød, Denmark
- The Centre for Fast-Track Hip and Knee Replacement, 7621, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Troels Petersen
- The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- The Centre for Fast-Track Hip and Knee Replacement, 7621, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Section of Surgical Pathophysiology, 7621, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Labott JR, Lu Y, Salmons HI, Camp CL, Wyles CC, Taunton MJ. Health and Socioeconomic Risk Factors for Unplanned Hospitalization Following Ambulatory Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Development of a Patient Selection Tool Using Machine Learning. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:1982-1989. [PMID: 36709883 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying ambulatory surgical candidates at risk for adverse surgical outcomes can optimize outcomes. The purpose of this study was to develop and internally validate a machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict contributors to unexpected hospitalizations after ambulatory unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS A total of 2,521 patients undergoing UKA from 2006 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients admitted overnight postoperatively were identified as those who had a length of stay ≥ 1 day were analyzed with four individual ML models (ie, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, adaptive boosting, and elastic net penalized logistic regression). An additional model was produced as a weighted ensemble of the four individual algorithms. Area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) compared predictive capacity of these models to conventional logistic regression techniques. RESULTS Of the 2,521 patients identified, 103 (4.1%) required at least one overnight stay following ambulatory UKA. The ML ensemble model achieved the best performance based on discrimination assessed via internal validation (AUROC = 87.3), outperforming individual models and conventional logistic regression (AUROC = 81.9-85.7). The variables determined most important by the ensemble model were cumulative time in the operating room, utilization of general anesthesia, increasing age, and patient residency in more urban areas. The model was integrated into a web-based open-access application. CONCLUSION The ensemble gradient-boosted ML algorithm demonstrated the highest performance in identifying factors contributing to unexpected hospitalizations in patients receiving UKA. This tool allows physicians and healthcare systems to identify patients at a higher risk of needing inpatient care after UKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua R Labott
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Yining Lu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Lab (OSAIL), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Harold I Salmons
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Christopher L Camp
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Lab (OSAIL), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Cody C Wyles
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Lab (OSAIL), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michael J Taunton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Lab (OSAIL), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karlin EA, Lin CC, Meftah M, Slover JD, Schwarzkopf R. The Impact of Machine Learning on Total Joint Arthroplasty Patient Outcomes: A Systemic Review. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:2085-2095. [PMID: 36441039 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supervised machine learning techniques have been increasingly applied to predict patient outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the applications of supervised machine learning techniques to predict patient outcomes after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. METHODS A comprehensive literature search using the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted in July of 2021. The inclusion criteria were studies that utilized supervised machine learning techniques to predict patient outcomes after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. RESULTS Search criteria yielded n = 30 relevant studies. Topics of study included patient complications (n = 6), readmissions (n = 1), revision (n = 2), patient-reported outcome measures (n = 4), patient satisfaction (n = 4), inpatient status and length of stay (LOS) (n = 9), opioid usage (n = 3), and patient function (n = 1). Studies involved TKA (n = 12), THA (n = 11), or a combination (n = 7). Less than 35% of predictive outcomes had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the excellent or outstanding range. Additionally, only 9 of the studies found improvement over logistic regression, and only 9 studies were externally validated. CONCLUSION Supervised machine learning algorithms are powerful tools that have been increasingly applied to predict patient outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty. However, these algorithms should be evaluated in the context of prognostic accuracy, comparison to traditional statistical techniques for outcome prediction, and application to populations outside the training set. While machine learning algorithms have been received with considerable interest, they should be critically assessed and validated prior to clinical adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elan A Karlin
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Charles C Lin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Morteza Meftah
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - James D Slover
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Ran Schwarzkopf
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen TLW, Buddhiraju A, Seo HH, Subih MA, Tuchinda P, Kwon YM. Internal and External Validation of the Generalizability of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Non-home Discharge Disposition Following Primary Total Knee Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:1973-1981. [PMID: 36764409 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonhome discharge disposition following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with a higher rate of complications and constitutes a socioeconomic burden on the health care system. While existing algorithms predicting nonhome discharge disposition varied in degrees of mathematical complexity and prediction power, their capacity to generalize predictions beyond the development dataset remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to establish the machine learning model generalizability by performing internal and external validations using nation-scale and institutional cohorts, respectively. METHODS Four machine learning models were trained using the national cohort. Recursive feature elimination and hyper-parameter tuning were applied. Internal validation was achieved through five-fold cross-validation during model training. The trained models' performance was externally validated using the institutional cohort and assessed by discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. RESULTS The national (424,354 patients) and institutional (10,196 patients) cohorts had non-home discharge rates of 19.4 and 36.4%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating curve of the model predictions were 0.83 to 0.84 during internal validation and increased to 0.88 to 0.89 during external validation. Artificial neural network and histogram-based gradient boosting elicited the best performance with a mean area under the receiver operating curve of 0.89, calibration slope of 1.39, and Brier score of 0.14, which indicated that the two models were robust in distinguishing non-home discharge and well-calibrated with accurate predictions of the probabilities. The low inter-dataset similarity indicated reliable external validation. Length of stay, age, body mass index, and sex were the strongest predictors of discharge destination after primary TKA. CONCLUSION The machine learning models demonstrated excellent predictive performance during both internal and external validations, supporting their generalizability across different patient cohorts and potential applicability in the clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Lin-Wei Chen
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anirudh Buddhiraju
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Henry Hojoon Seo
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Murad Abdullah Subih
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pete Tuchinda
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Young-Min Kwon
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kurmis AP. A role for artificial intelligence applications inside and outside of the operating theatre: a review of contemporary use associated with total knee arthroplasty. ARTHROPLASTY 2023; 5:40. [PMID: 37400876 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00189-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) has become involved in many aspects of everyday life, from voice-activated virtual assistants built into smartphones to global online search engines. Similarly, many areas of modern medicine have found ways to incorporate such technologies into mainstream practice. Despite the enthusiasm, robust evidence to support the utility of AI in contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains limited. The purpose of this review was to provide an up-to-date summary of the use of AI in TKA and to explore its current and future value. METHODS Initially, a structured systematic review of the literature was carried out, following PRISMA search principles, with the aim of summarising the understanding of the field and identifying clinical and knowledge gaps. RESULTS A limited body of published work exists in this area. Much of the available literature is of poor methodological quality and many published studies could be best described as "demonstration of concepts" rather than "proof of concepts". There exists almost no independent validation of reported findings away from designer/host sites, and the extrapolation of key results to general orthopaedic sites is limited. CONCLUSION While AI has certainly shown value in a small number of specific TKA-associated applications, the majority to date have focused on risk, cost and outcome prediction, rather than surgical care, per se. Extensive future work is needed to demonstrate external validity and reliability in non-designer settings. Well-performed studies are warranted to ensure that the scientific evidence base supporting the use of AI in knee arthroplasty matches the global hype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew P Kurmis
- Discipline of Medical Specialties, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Haydown Road, Elizabeth Vale, SA, 5112, Australia.
- College of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zalikha AK, Court T, Nham F, El-Othmani MM, Shah RP. Improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables. ARTHROPLASTY 2023; 5:31. [PMID: 37393281 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00187-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the performance of ten predictive models using different machine learning (ML) algorithms and compare the performance of models developed using patient-specific vs. situational variables in predicting select outcomes after primary TKA. METHODS Data from 2016 to 2017 from the National Inpatient Sample were used to identify 305,577 discharges undergoing primary TKA, which were included in the training, testing, and validation of 10 ML models. 15 predictive variables consisting of 8 patient-specific and 7 situational variables were utilized to predict length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and mortality. Using the best performing algorithms, models trained using either 8 patient-specific and 7 situational variables were then developed and compared. RESULTS For models developed using all 15 variables, Linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM) was the most responsive model for predicting LOS. LSVM and XGT Boost Tree were equivalently most responsive for predicting discharge disposition. LSVM and XGT Boost Linear were equivalently most responsive for predicting mortality. Decision List, CHAID, and LSVM were the most reliable models for predicting LOS and discharge disposition, while XGT Boost Tree, Decision List, LSVM, and CHAID were most reliable for mortality. Models developed using the 8 patient-specific variables outperformed those developed using the 7 situational variables, with few exceptions. CONCLUSION This study revealed that performance of different models varied, ranging from poor to excellent, and demonstrated that models developed using patient-specific variables were typically better predictive of quality metrics after TKA than those developed employing situational variables. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul K Zalikha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Tannor Court
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Fong Nham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
| | - Mouhanad M El-Othmani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Roshan P Shah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Niculescu M, Honțaru OS, Popescu G, Sterian AG, Dobra M. Challenges of Integrating New Technologies for Orthopedic Doctors to Face up to Difficulties during the Pandemic Era. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:1524. [PMID: 37297666 PMCID: PMC10288938 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11111524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In the field of orthopedics, competitive progress is growing faster because new technologies used to facilitate the work of physicians are continuously developing. Based on the issues generated in the pandemic era in this field, a research study was developed to identify the intention of orthopedic doctors to integrate new medical technologies. The survey was based on a questionnaire that was used for data collection. The quantitative study registered a sample of 145 orthopedic doctors. The data analysis was performed based on the IBM SPSS program. A multiple linear regression model was applied, which analyzed how the independent variables can influence the dependent variables. After analyzing the data, it was observed that the intention of orthopedic doctors to use new medical technologies is influenced by the advantages and disadvantages perceived by them, the perceived risks, the quality of the medical technologies, the experience of physicians in their use, and their receptivity to other digital tools. The obtained results are highly important both for hospital managers and authorities, illustrating the main factors that influence doctors to use emergent technologies in their clinical work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Niculescu
- Faculty of Medicine, “Titu Maiorescu” University of Bucharest, 031593 Bucharest, Romania;
- Colentina Hospital, Șoseaua Ștefan cel Mare 19-21, 020125 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Octavia-Sorina Honțaru
- Faculty of Sciences, Physical Education and Informatics, University of Pitesti, Târgul din Vale 1, 110040 Arges, Romania
- Department of Public Health Arges, Exercitiu 39 bis, 110438 Arges, Romania
| | - George Popescu
- Emergency Clinical Hospital Dr. Bagdasar-Arseni, Șoseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alin Gabriel Sterian
- Emergency Hospital for Children Grigore Alexandrescu, 30-32 Iancu de Hunedoara Boulevard, 011743 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Orthopedics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihai Dobra
- Center of Uronephrology and Renal Transplant Fundeni, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
LeBrun DG, Nguyen J, Fisher C, Tuohy S, Lyman S, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Ast MP, Carli AV. The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) Score Predicts Discharge Destination, Length of Stay, and Postoperative Mobility after Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2023:S0883-5403(23)00479-5. [PMID: 37182588 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Predicting an arthroplasty patient's discharge disposition, length of stay, and physical function is helpful because it allows for preoperative patient optimization, expectation management, and discharge planning. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) score to predict discharge destination, length of stay, and postoperative mobility in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS Primary unilateral TKAs (n=9,064) and THAs (n=8,649) performed for primary osteoarthritis at our institution from 2018 to 2021 (excluding March to June 2020) were identified using a prospectively maintained institutional registry. We evaluated the associations between preoperative RAPT score and (1) discharge destination, (2) length of stay, and postoperative mobility as measured by (3) successful ambulation on the day of surgery and (4) Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-Clicks" score. RESULTS On multivariable analyses adjusting for multiple covariates, every one-point increase in RAPT score among TKA patients was associated with a 1.82-fold increased odds of home discharge (P<0.001), 0.22 days shorter length of stay (P<0.001), 1.13-fold increased odds of ambulating on postoperative day 0 (P<0.001), and 0.25-point higher AM-PAC score (P<0.001). Similar findings were seen among THAs. A RAPT score of 8 or higher was the most sensitive and specific cutoff to predict home discharge. CONCLUSION Among nearly 18,000 TKA and THA patients, RAPT score was predictive of discharge disposition, length of stay, and postoperative mobility. A RAPT score of 8 or higher was the most sensitive and specific cutoff to predict discharge to home. In contrast to prior studies of the RAPT score which have grouped TKAs and THAs together, this study ran separate analyses for TKAs and THAs and found that THA patients seemed to perform better than TKA patients with equal RAPT scores, suggesting that RAPT may behave differently between TKAs and THAs, particularly in the intermediate risk RAPT range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drake G LeBrun
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70(th) Street, New York, NY 10021.
| | - Joseph Nguyen
- Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70(th) Street, New York, NY, 10021
| | - Charles Fisher
- Acute Care Rehabilitation, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70(th) Street, New York, NY, 10021
| | - Sharlynn Tuohy
- Acute Care Rehabilitation, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70(th) Street, New York, NY, 10021
| | - Stephen Lyman
- Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70(th) Street, New York, NY, 10021
| | | | - Michael P Ast
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70(th) Street, New York, NY 10021
| | - Alberto V Carli
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70(th) Street, New York, NY 10021
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wellington IJ, Messina JC, Cote MP. Editorial Commentary: Knowledge is Power: A Primer for Machine Learning. Arthroscopy 2023; 39:159-160. [PMID: 36603988 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has become an increasingly common statistical methodology in medical research. In recent years, ML techniques have been used with greater frequency to evaluate orthopaedic data. ML allows for the creation of adaptive predictive models that can be applied to clinical patient outcomes. However, ML models for predicting clinical or safety outcomes may be made available online so that physicians may apply these models to their patients to make predictions. If the algorithms have not been externally validated, then the models are not likely to generalize, and their predictions will suffer from inaccuracy. This is especially important to bear in mind because the recent increase in ML papers in the medical literature includes publications with fundamental flaws.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian James Wellington
- University of Connecticut Health Center: Massachusetts General Hospital (I.J.W., J.C.M.)
| | - James C Messina
- University of Connecticut Health Center: Massachusetts General Hospital (I.J.W., J.C.M.)
| | - Mark P Cote
- University of Connecticut Health Center: Massachusetts General Hospital (I.J.W., J.C.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Polisetty TS, Jain S, Pang M, Karnuta JM, Vigdorchik JM, Nawabi DH, Wyles CC, Ramkumar PN. Concerns surrounding application of artificial intelligence in hip and knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:1292-1303. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b12.bjj-2022-0922.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Literature surrounding artificial intelligence (AI)-related applications for hip and knee arthroplasty has proliferated. However, meaningful advances that fundamentally transform the practice and delivery of joint arthroplasty are yet to be realized, despite the broad range of applications as we continue to search for meaningful and appropriate use of AI. AI literature in hip and knee arthroplasty between 2018 and 2021 regarding image-based analyses, value-based care, remote patient monitoring, and augmented reality was reviewed. Concerns surrounding meaningful use and appropriate methodological approaches of AI in joint arthroplasty research are summarized. Of the 233 AI-related orthopaedics articles published, 178 (76%) constituted original research, while the rest consisted of editorials or reviews. A total of 52% of original AI-related research concerns hip and knee arthroplasty (n = 92), and a narrative review is described. Three studies were externally validated. Pitfalls surrounding present-day research include conflating vernacular (“AI/machine learning”), repackaging limited registry data, prematurely releasing internally validated prediction models, appraising model architecture instead of inputted data, withholding code, and evaluating studies using antiquated regression-based guidelines. While AI has been applied to a variety of hip and knee arthroplasty applications with limited clinical impact, the future remains promising if the question is meaningful, the methodology is rigorous and transparent, the data are rich, and the model is externally validated. Simple checkpoints for meaningful AI adoption include ensuring applications focus on: administrative support over clinical evaluation and management; necessity of the advanced model; and the novelty of the question being answered. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1292–1303.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teja S. Polisetty
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Samagra Jain
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Pang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jaret M. Karnuta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Danyal H. Nawabi
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Cody C. Wyles
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Prem N. Ramkumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salmons HI, Lu Y, Reed RR, Forsythe B, Sebastian AS. Implementation of Machine Learning to Predict Cost of Care Associated with Ambulatory Single-Level Lumbar Decompression. World Neurosurg 2022; 167:e1072-e1079. [PMID: 36089278 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the emergence of the concept of value-based care, efficient resource allocation has become an increasingly prominent factor in surgical decision-making. Validated machine learning (ML) models for cost prediction in outpatient spine surgery are limited. As such, we developed and internally validated a supervised ML algorithm to reliably identify cost drivers associated with ambulatory single-level lumbar decompression surgery. METHODS A retrospective review of the New York State Ambulatory Surgical Database was performed to identify patients who underwent single-level lumbar decompression from 2014 to 2015. Patients with a length of stay of >0 were excluded. Using pre- and intraoperative parameters (features) derived from the New York State Ambulatory Surgical Database, an optimal supervised ML model was ultimately developed and internally validated after 5 candidate models were rigorously tested, trained, and compared for predictive performance related to total charges. The best performing model was then evaluated by testing its performance on identifying relationships between features of interest and cost prediction. Finally, the best performing algorithm was entered into an open-access web application. RESULTS A total of 8402 patients were included. The gradient-boosted ensemble model demonstrated the best performance assessed via internal validation. Major cost drivers included anesthesia type, operating room time, race, patient income and insurance status, community type, worker's compensation status, and comorbidity index. CONCLUSIONS The gradient-boosted ensemble model predicted total charges and associated cost drivers associated with ambulatory single-level lumbar decompression using a large, statewide database with excellent performance. External validation of this algorithm in future studies may guide practical application of this clinical tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold I Salmons
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Yining Lu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ryder R Reed
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Brian Forsythe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Arjun S Sebastian
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The Utility of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Early Revision Surgery After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:513-522. [PMID: 35196268 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-01039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs due to a technically more demanding surgical procedure when compared with primary THA. Therefore, a better understanding of risk factors for early revision THA is essential to develop strategies for mitigating the risk of patients undergoing early revision. This study aimed to develop and validate novel machine learning (ML) models for the prediction of early revision after primary THA. METHODS A total of 7,397 consecutive patients who underwent primary THA were evaluated, including 566 patients (6.6%) with confirmed early revision THA (<2 years from index THA). Electronic patient records were manually reviewed to identify patient demographics, implant characteristics, and surgical variables that may be associated with early revision THA. Six ML algorithms were developed to predict early revision THA, and these models were assessed by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS The strongest predictors for early revision after primary THA were Charlson Comorbidity Index, body mass index >35 kg/m2, and depression. The six ML models all achieved excellent performance across discrimination (area under the curve >0.80), calibration, and decision curve analysis. CONCLUSION This study developed ML models for the prediction of early revision surgery for patients after primary THA. The study findings show excellent performance on discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis for all six candidate models, highlighting the potential of these models to assist in clinical practice patient-specific preoperative quantification of increased risk of early revision THA.
Collapse
|
15
|
Polce EM, Kunze KN, Dooley MS, Piuzzi NS, Boettner F, Sculco PK. Efficacy and Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Analyses in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Call for Improved Reporting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:821-832. [PMID: 35045061 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a considerable increase in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) research using machine learning (ML). Therefore, the purposes of this study were to synthesize the applications and efficacies of ML reported in the TJA literature, and to assess the methodological quality of these studies. METHODS PubMed, OVID/MEDLINE, and Cochrane libraries were queried in January 2021 for articles regarding the use of ML in TJA. Study demographics, topic, primary and secondary outcomes, ML model development and testing, and model presentation and validation were recorded. The TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis) guidelines were used to assess the methodological quality. RESULTS Fifty-five studies were identified: 31 investigated clinical outcomes and resource utilization; 11, activity and motion surveillance; 10, imaging detection; and 3, natural language processing. For studies reporting the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the median AUC (and range) was 0.80 (0.60 to 0.97) among 26 clinical outcome studies, 0.99 (0.83 to 1.00) among 6 imaging-based studies, and 0.88 (0.76 to 0.98) among 3 activity and motion surveillance studies. Twelve studies compared ML to logistic regression, with 9 (75%) reporting that ML was superior. The average number of TRIPOD guidelines met was 11.5 (range: 5 to 18), with 38 (69%) meeting greater than half of the criteria. Presentation and explanation of the full model for individual predictions and assessments of model calibration were poorly reported (<30%). CONCLUSIONS The performance of ML models was good to excellent when applied to a wide variety of clinically relevant outcomes in TJA. However, reporting of certain key methodological and model presentation criteria was inadequate. Despite the recent surge in TJA literature utilizing ML, the lack of consistent adherence to reporting guidelines needs to be addressed to bridge the gap between model development and clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Polce
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kyle N Kunze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Matthew S Dooley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Friedrich Boettner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Peter K Sculco
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kurmis AP, Ianunzio JR. Artificial intelligence in orthopedic surgery: evolution, current state and future directions. ARTHROPLASTY 2022; 4:9. [PMID: 35232490 PMCID: PMC8889658 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-022-00112-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Technological advances continue to evolve at a breath-taking pace. Computer-navigation, robot-assistance and three-dimensional digital planning have become commonplace in many parts of the world. With near exponential advances in computer processing capacity, and the advent, progressive understanding and refinement of software algorithms, medicine and orthopaedic surgery have begun to delve into artificial intelligence (AI) systems. While for some, such applications still seem in the realm of science fiction, these technologies are already in selective clinical use and are likely to soon see wider uptake. The purpose of this structured review was to provide an understandable summary to non-academic orthopaedic surgeons, exploring key definitions and basic development principles of AI technology as it currently stands. To ensure content validity and representativeness, a structured, systematic review was performed following the accepted PRISMA principles. The paper concludes with a forward-look into heralded and potential applications of AI technology in orthopedic surgery.While not intended to be a detailed technical description of the complex processing that underpins AI applications, this work will take a small step forward in demystifying some of the commonly-held misconceptions regarding AI and its potential benefits to patients and surgeons. With evidence-supported broader awareness, we aim to foster an open-mindedness among clinicians toward such technologies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew P Kurmis
- Discipline of Medical Specialties, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. .,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Vale, Elizabeth, SA, Australia.
| | - Jamie R Ianunzio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Vale, Elizabeth, SA, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lu C, Song J, Li H, Yu W, Hao Y, Xu K, Xu P. Predicting Venous Thrombosis in Osteoarthritis Using a Machine Learning Algorithm: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12010114. [PMID: 35055429 PMCID: PMC8781369 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12010114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease associated with pain and disability. OA patients are at a high risk for venous thrombosis (VTE). Here, we developed an interpretable machine learning (ML)-based model to predict VTE risk in patients with OA. To establish a prediction model, we used six ML algorithms, of which 35 variables were employed. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) was used to screen the most related clinical variables associated with VTE. SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to interpret the ML mode and determine the importance of the selected features. Overall, 3169 patients with OA (average age: 66.52 ± 7.28 years) were recruited from Xi’an Honghui Hospital. Of these, 352 and 2817 patients were diagnosed with and without VTE, respectively. The XGBoost algorithm showed the best performance. According to the RFE algorithms, 15 variables were retained for further modeling with the XGBoost algorithm. The top three predictors were Kellgren–Lawrence grade, age, and hypertension. Our study showed that the XGBoost model with 15 variables has a high potential to predict VTE risk in patients with OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Lu
- Department of Joint Surgery, Xi’an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710054, China; (C.L.); (J.S.); (H.L.); (W.Y.); (Y.H.)
| | - Jiayin Song
- Department of Joint Surgery, Xi’an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710054, China; (C.L.); (J.S.); (H.L.); (W.Y.); (Y.H.)
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Joint Surgery, Xi’an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710054, China; (C.L.); (J.S.); (H.L.); (W.Y.); (Y.H.)
- Department of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, The First Clinical College of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi’an 712046, China
| | - Wenxing Yu
- Department of Joint Surgery, Xi’an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710054, China; (C.L.); (J.S.); (H.L.); (W.Y.); (Y.H.)
| | - Yangquan Hao
- Department of Joint Surgery, Xi’an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710054, China; (C.L.); (J.S.); (H.L.); (W.Y.); (Y.H.)
| | - Ke Xu
- Department of Joint Surgery, Xi’an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710054, China; (C.L.); (J.S.); (H.L.); (W.Y.); (Y.H.)
- Correspondence: (K.X.); (P.X.)
| | - Peng Xu
- Department of Joint Surgery, Xi’an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710054, China; (C.L.); (J.S.); (H.L.); (W.Y.); (Y.H.)
- Correspondence: (K.X.); (P.X.)
| |
Collapse
|