Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intrawound Vancomycin in Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Continued Call for a Prospective Randomized Trial

Effectiveness of intra-articular vancomycin in preventing prosthetic joint infections in hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT's

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular vancomycin powder in reducing prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) in primary hip and knee arthroplasty through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

A research in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed to identify randomized clinical trials comparing intra-articular vancomycin use to conventional antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip or knee arthroplasty patients, assessing postoperative infection rates, adverse drug reactions, and venous thrombotic events. Statistical analysis was performed using R (RStudio 2024.04.2), and heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 test.

Results

A total of 1485 patients from five randomized clinical trials were included, with 737 receiving intra-articular vancomycin. The infection rate was 0.54 % in the intervention group and 1.73 % in the control group (RR 0.37; 95 % CI 0.02-8.95; p = 0.369; I2 = 49 %), showing no statistically significant difference between the groups. Adverse reactions to the glycopeptide were reported in six cases (0.8 %) in the intervention group compared to four cases (0.5 %) in the control group (RR 1.50; 95 % CI 1.50-150; p = 0.001; I2 = 0 %). Regarding thrombotic events, there was one case in 647 patients in the intervention group and three cases in 660 patients in the control group (RR 0.45; 95 % CI 0.03-7.02; p = 0.169; I2 = 0 %).

Conclusion

Although no significant difference was found, the intervention group showed a trend toward lower infection rates. Additional RCTs with larger sample sizes are required to confirm these findings.

Trial registration

The prospective registration of the meta-analysis was conducted on PROSPERO in July 2024 with the protocol number 565988.

Intra-wound vancomycin powder is cost-saving in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study seeks to explore whether intra-wound vancomycin powder (IVP) is a cost-effective adjunct to standard of care (SOC) in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) from a US payor perspective.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model in the form of a decision tree was developed to compare the cost and outcomes of IVP with those of SOC in preventing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in TJA patients. The base case analysis assumes a hypothetical practice with an equal volume (50/50) of THA and TKA procedures in both the IVP + SOC and the SOC arm. Cost and clinical effectiveness data were obtained from published literature. Sensitivity and threshold analyses were used to estimate how changing inputs would impact the cost-effectiveness of IVP.

RESULTS

Deterministic results found that in the base case model, IVP as an adjunct to SOC generates a cost saving of $260.38/patient. In scenario analysis, where THA and TKA procedures were separated, the estimated cost saving was $241.50/patient and $279.27/patient, respectively. Break-even analysis showed that the cost of IVP per patient would need to be $244.82-$282.59, or the PJI relative risk (RR) be approximately 0.99. Probabilistic analysis found IVP + SOC was cost-saving in 99.26% of the 10,000 iterations in the base case model.

CONCLUSION

Applying local vancomycin as an adjunct to SOC in primary TJA is not just cost effective, but cost-saving in reducing PJIs, saving an average of $260.38/patient. Depending on individual institution/practice infection rates and revision surgery costs, local vancomycin administration for primary TJA should be considered.

Intrawound vancomycin powder for prevention of surgical site infections in primary joint arthroplasty: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this umbrella review is to explore the effect of intrawound vancomycin on the incidence of infection and wound complications in patients undergoing primary joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

Two authors conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 15 October 2023. All systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining the effect of intrawound vancomycin on the incidence of infection and wound complications in primary joint arthroplasty were included. Two authors independently screened and extracted the data from the studies, evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scale, and assessed the publication bias and small-sample effects.

RESULTS

Our umbrella review includes a total of five systematic reviews, comprising 16 retrospective studies. The pooled results indicate that intrawound vancomycin significantly reduces overall infection rates [odds ratio (OR): 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0.54, P < 0.001], superficial infections (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26-0.97, P = 0.04), and periprosthetic joint infection rates (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.28-0.52, P < 0.001) among patients undergoing primary joint arthroplasty. However, vancomycin did not increase the risk of aseptic wound complications (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.88-2.04, P = 0.17) and prolong wound healing (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.87-2.26, P = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available research, our umbrella review demonstrates that intrawound vancomycin significantly reduces infection rates in primary joint arthroplasty, including periprosthetic joint and superficial infections, without increasing wound complications. However, given the inclusion of studies with varying quality, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further high-quality studies are needed to better confirm its long-term safety, cost-effectiveness, and overall clinical utility.

Safety and efficacy of combined intra-articular administration of vancomycin and ε-aminocaproic acid in total hip arthroplasty : a clinical study

Aims

To evaluate the concurrent use of vancomycin and ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

In total, 120 patients undergoing unilateral primary THA were divided into three groups: Group VE received intra-articular vancomycin and EACA; Group V received only intra-articular vancomycin; and Group E received only intra-articular EACA. Blood and joint fluids were sampled postoperatively to measure the vancomycin levels using chromatography. Blood loss and kidney function were monitored.

Results

Groups E and VE had equivalent blood loss, which was less than that in Group V. Intra-articular vancomycin levels were higher in Group VE at all intervals, with similar serum levels across the groups. Acute kidney injury, ototoxicity, and allergies were not observed, nor was a difference in rates of periprosthetic joint infection.

Conclusion

Adding intra-articular EACA to vancomycin did not affect intra-articular vancomycin levels, and maintained EACA's antifibrinolytic effects.

Does the use of topical vancomycin during primary hip or knee arthroplasty protect from infections?

BACKGROUND

Infection is one of the main complications of hip and knee arthroplasties. Topical application vancomycin to prevent postoperative infections is efficient in spine surgery, and is spreading in prosthetic surgery. However, its clinical relevance and safety are still under debate. Thus, we conducted the present study to (1) assess whether topical vancomycin reduces peri-prosthetic infection rate, and (2) investigate its influence on surgical wound complications.

HYPOTHESIS

Our hypothesis was that topical administration of diluted vancomycin during arthroplasty would reduce infection rate within the first postoperative year.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 1900 hip and knee arthroplasties were performed between 2014 and 2021 in a single hospital. From July 2018 and December 2021, 910 prostheses were implanted with intra-articular instillation of vancomycin and tranexamic acid. From November 2014 to June 2018, 990 prostheses were set up without vancomycin. During a follow-up of minimum 12 months, we reported periprosthetic infections occurring during the first postoperative year, as well as vancomycin-induced general or cutaneous complications.

RESULTS

We observed periprosthetic infections in 9/990 cases (0.91%) of the control group and 10/910 cases (1.1%) of the vancomycin group (p = 0.82). In parallel, we observed wound complications (erythema, seroma, hematoma, dehiscence and delay in wound healing) in 19/990 (1.9%) and 10/910 cases (1.1%) of the control and vancomycin group, respectively (p = 0.19). There were no general complications resulting from the application of vancomycin.

DISCUSSION

Topical diluted vancomycin does not reduce periprosthetic infection risk, and has no effect on the occurrence of surgery wound complications. Considering the present findings, the use of vancomycin cannot be recommended in current practice to prevent infections following hip and knee arthroplasties. Finally, its use does not induce any specific complications, whether local (cicatrisation) or general (related to ototoxicity or nephrotoxicity).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case control study.

Trends and Epidemiology in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Large Database Study

BACKGROUND

The clinical and financial burden of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) continues to grow. Therefore, further investigation is needed to characterize case volume, reason for failure, and postoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to characterize contemporary indications for and complications following rTHA.

METHODS

Patients undergoing rTHA between 2010 and 2021 were identified within the PearlDiver database. Adjusted rTHA incidence was calculated by dividing the annual rTHA volume by the annual primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and multiplying by 100,000. Mann-Kendall trend tests were utilized to trend revision volume, etiology, and 90-day postoperative complications. A total of 225,958 rTHAs were identified.

RESULTS

The annual volume of rTHA did not change over the study period (18,871 to 15,994; P = 0.064). However, the adjusted incidence of rTHA significantly decreased (20,169.3 to 13,061.2 per 100,000 THAs; P < 0.001). The most common causes of rTHA were aseptic implant loosening (21.5%), instability (19.8%), and infection (19.1%). The adjusted incidences of revision due to infection (4,659.9 to 2,596.1 per 100,000 THAs; P < 0.001) and aseptic implant loosening (4,651.4 to 2,493.2 per 100,000 THAs; P < 0.001) decreased over time. The adjusted rate of instability (3,149.8 to 3,245.3 per 100,000 THAs; P = 0.304) did not change. Rates of post-revision deep vein thrombosis, hematoma, surgical site infection, and transfusion significantly decreased over the study period (P < 0.05), while rates of emergency department visits and readmission did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to a decreased adjusted incidence of rTHA, our analysis demonstrated a decreased incidence of infection, aseptic loosening, and various postoperative complications. However, no difference in the adjusted incidence of instability and periprosthetic fracture was seen over our study period. Continued study is necessary to further decrease the need for rTHA with a focus on the etiologies and complications that have remained unchanged.

Intra-articular injection of vancomycin after arthrotomy closure following gentamicin-impregnated bone cementation in primary total knee arthroplasty provides a high intra-articular concentration while avoiding systemic toxicity: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to elucidate the safety and intra-articular elution profiles of vancomycin and gentamicin bone cement in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with a focus on serum safety thresholds and therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA were prospectively enrolled. The implants were fixed using gentamicin-impregnated bone cement, and after arthrotomy closure, 1000 mg of vancomycin suspended in 25 mL of normal saline was directly injected into the joint. Peripheral venous blood and drain fluid samples were collected 2, 8, and 24 h postoperatively. The serum and intra-articular concentrations of vancomycin and gentamicin were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry within 24 h.

RESULTS

Clinical data reflecting renal and liver function were recorded preoperatively, and at 24 and 72 h postoperatively. A total of 100 patients were included. At 2, 8, and 24 h postoperatively, the serum vancomycin concentration was 7.0 ± 2.0, 5.7 ± 1.8, and 3.6 ± 1.4 µg/mL, respectively, while the intra-articular concentration was 468.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 286.0 to 774.8), 139.5 (IQR 52.0 to 295.3), and 34.4 (IQR 22.2 to 56.8) µg/mL, respectively; 33.2 (IQR 19.5 to 80.5) mg vancomycin was lost in drainage fluid at 24 h postoperatively. For gentamicin, the overall intra-articular concentration was 70.4 (IQR 35.4 to 109.2), 33.8 (IQR 17.8 to 73.9), and 21.1 (IQR 12.2 to 36.0) µg/mL at 2, 8, and 24 h postoperatively, respectively, with an undetectable serum concentration. No cases of acute renal injury, liver injury, ototoxicity, or anaphylaxis were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular injection of 1000 mg vancomycin after arthrotomy closure combined with gentamicin-impregnated bone cement provided a therapeutic intra-articular concentration while avoiding systemic toxicity over the initial 24 h after primary TKA. Therefore, intra-articular vancomycin administration may offer a safer alternative to intravenous antibiotics, reducing systemic toxicity; however, further large-scale studies are necessary.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials. Gov (registration number: NCT05338021).

Analysis of systemic serum vancomycin levels following intraarticular application in primary total joint arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PJI accounts for 15-25% of revision surgeries, therefore it is associated with PJI is associated with substantial patient morbidity and mortality as well as increased healthcare expenditures due to complex treatment strategies. Recently, intraoperative local application of vancomycin powder is increasingly being used in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) as an additive strategy for PJI prevention. Whereas local vancomycin concentrations have already been investigated in prior studies, evidence on systemic vancomycin levels and potential adverse drug reactions (ADR) is limited. Purpose of this study was to investigate systemic vancomycin levels following intraarticular application in primary TJA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This pilot study is a prospective analysis of patients undergoing primary THA and TKA between April and July 2023. One gram of vancomycin powder was applied to the prosthesis prior to wound closure. Serum vancomycin levels were measured at two standardised time points, 24 and 48 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

In total, 103 patients were included, and the patient collective was further stratified by surgical procedure into a THA subgroup (n = 52) and a TKA subgroup (n = 51). Mean serum vancomycin levels showed a significant group difference at both time points (24 h: p < 0.001; 48 h: p = 0.044) with higher serum vancomycin concentrations in the THA cohort. Mean serum vancomycin levels in THA patients were 1.25 μg/ml (range 0.00-7.00 μg/ml) after 24 h and 0.34 μg/ml (range 0.00-4.80 μg/ml) 48 h postoperatively. In TKA, no systemic vancomycin levels were detected. Vancomycin concentrations did not reach therapeutic levels in any patient. No ADR was detected in the whole study collective.

CONCLUSION

Following intraarticular administration of vancomycin powder, no systemic vancomycin levels within the therapeutic range were detected, thus it may serve as a safe and cost-effective adjunct to strategies for prevention of PJI.

Periprosthetic joint infections: state-of-the-art

In general, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is regarded as one of the most common complications of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and may lead to surgical failure, revision surgery, amputation or death. Nowadays, PJI has become a global health concern, which brings a great burden to public healthcare. In addition, there are still obstacles to achieve high success rates in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of PJI. However, promising studies are also available with the advancements in biotechnology. This article will present an overview of the current methods used in the prevention, diagnosis and management of PJI while underlining the new technologies utilized.

Intrawound vancomycin powder in primary total knee arthroplasty: Does it reduce early postoperative infection?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective analysis of a prospective quality control project was to determine whether the use of intrawound vancomycin powder (IVP) decreases the rate prosthetic joint infection (PJI) within 90-days following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

From October 2021-September 2022, a prospective quality control project was undertaken in which 10 high-volume arthroplasty surgeons alternated between using IVP and not using IVP each month. Patients who received IVP were compared to those who did not. The primary outcome was culture positive PJI within 90-days following primary total knee arthroplasty. Secondary outcomes included overall reoperation rate, wound complications, and readmission within 90-days post-operatively.

RESULTS

A total of 1,317 primary TKA patients were identified for analysis. Fifty-six and seven tenths percent (n = 747) of patients were included in the IVP group and 43.3% (n = 570) patients were included in the non-IVP group. The overall PJI rate was 0.5%. There was no difference in 90-day culture positive PJI rates between the groups (0.7% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.24). The overall reoperation rate did not differ between the IVP and non-IVP group (6.4% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.15). Reoperation for suspected infection was not statistically different by IVP administration (1.2% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.25). Additionally, there were no differences in the incidence of wound complications (p = 0.80) or readmissions (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall infection rate for this cohort was low. IVP was not associated with decreased culture positive PJI, wound complications, reoperation or readmission rates. Further analysis of IVP use in TKA should be undertaken to fully determine its efficacy and safety profile.

Local vancomycin administration in Orthopaedic Surgery - A systematic review of comparative studies

Background

There is still controversy surrounding the routine use of vancomycin locally in primary orthopaedic surgery procedures. Therefore, the aim of this review is to assess how local vancomycin impacts the rates and microbiology of surgical site infections.

Methods

A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was carried out for all comparative studies comparing locally applied vancomycin to control for primary orthopaedic surgery procedures published before August 14, 2022.

Results

A total of 61 studies with 65,671 patients were included for analysis. Forty-six studies used vancomycin powder, 12 studies with grafts soaked in vancomycin, two studies used vancomycin irrigation, and one study administered vancomycin interosseously. There were 15 studies (of 26) in spine surgery, five (of 14) in arthroplasty, ten (of 11) in sports medicine, and two (of five) in trauma surgery that found statistically significant decreases in overall infection rates when applying local vancomycin. Only one study (in spine surgery) found significant increases in infection rates with local vancomycin application. For spine surgery, local vancomycin application had the greatest proportion of gram-negative bacteria (40.7%) isolated compared to S. aureus (42.4%) in controls. In arthroplasty and trauma surgery, there were increases in the proportions of gram-negative bacteria when vancomycin was added. There were no reported systemic adverse reactions associated with local vancomycin use in any of the studies.

Conclusion

Applying local vancomycin during primary orthopaedic surgery procedures may reduce the rates of infections in multiple different orthopaedic specialties, particularly in spine surgery and sports medicine. However, careful consideration should be applied when administering local vancomycin during specific orthopaedic procedures given the heterogeneity of included studies and breadth of surgeries included in this review.

Level of evidence

Level III. A systematic review of level I - III studies.

Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Quality Control Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective analysis of a prospective quality control project was to determine whether the use of intrawound vancomycin powder (IVP) decreases the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) within 90 days following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

From October 2021 to September 2022, a prospective quality control project was undertaken in which 10 high-volume THA surgeons alternated between using and not using IVP each month while keeping other perioperative protocols unchanged. A retrospective analysis of the project was performed to compare the group of patients who received IVP to the group of patients who did not. The primary outcome was a culture positive infection within 90 days following primary THA. Secondary outcomes included gram-positive culture, overall reoperation rate, wound complications, readmission, and wound complications within 90 days post-operatively. A total of 1,193 primary THA patients were identified for analysis. There were 523 (43.8%) patients who received IVP and were included in the IVP group, while 670 (56.2%) did not and were included in the non-IVP group. Age, body mass index, and sex were similar between the 2 groups (P > .25).

RESULTS

The IVP group had a higher rate of culture positive joint infections (1.7 [0.8, 3.2] versus 0.3% [0.04, 1.1], P = .01) than the non-IVP group. All PJI's were found to have gram positive bacteria in both groups. The IVP group had a higher overall reoperation rate than the non-IVP group (6.1 [4.2, 8.5] versus 2.4% [1.4, 3.9], P < .01). The IVP group had a higher reoperation rate for any wound complication compared to non-IVP patients (2.7 [1.5, 4.5] versus 0.7% [0.2, 1.7], P < .01). The overall readmission rate (6.1 [4.2, 8.5] versus 2.8% [1.7, 4.4], P < .01), as well as readmission for suspected infection (2.1 [1.1, 3.7] versus 0.6% [0.02, 1.5], P = .03), were higher in the IVP group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IVP in primary THA was associated with a higher rate of PJI, overall reoperation, reoperation for wound complications, and readmission in a prospective quality control project. Until future prospective randomized studies determine the safety and efficacy of IVP in THA conclusively, we advocate against its utilization.

Effect of topical vancomycin powder on surgical site infection prevention in major orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence has been mixed regarding the effect of topical vancomycin (VCM) powder in reducing surgical site infection (SSI).

AIM

To clarify the effect of topical VCM powder for the prevention of SSI in major orthopaedic surgeries.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from their inception to September 25th, 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing topical VCM powder and controls for the prevention of SSI in major orthopaedic surgeries were included. Two reviewers independently screened the title and abstract and extracted relevant data, followed by the assessment of the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence. Main outcome measures were overall SSI, reoperation, and adverse events. Summary results were obtained using random-effects meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.

FINDINGS

Eight randomized controlled trials yielded data on 4307 participants. VCM powder showed no difference in reducing overall SSI. The cumulative number of patients did not exceed the required information size of 19,233 in our TSA, and the Z-curves did not cross the trial sequential monitoring or futility boundary, suggesting an inconclusive result of the meta-analysis. No difference was found for reoperation. Among SSIs, VCM powder showed a statistically significant difference in reducing Gram-positive cocci SSI. However, the certainty of this evidence was very low.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests inconclusive results regarding the effect of VCM powder in reducing SSI in major orthopaedic surgeries. Further trials using rigorous methodologies are required to elucidate the effect of this intervention.

Comparison of the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine irrigation and topical vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine irrigation alone on the periprosthetic joint infection incidence rate in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a protocol for multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

With the increasing number of joint replacement surgeries, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has become a significant concern in orthopedic practice, making research on PJI prevention paramount. Therefore, the study will aim to compare the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine and topical vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine alone on the PJI incidence rate in patients undergoing primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

The prospective randomized clinical trial will be conducted in two independent voivodeship hospitals with extensive experience in lower limb arthroplasties. The studied material will comprise 840 patients referred to hospitals for primary THA or TKA. The patients will be randomly allocated to two equal groups, receiving two different interventions during joint replacement. In group I, povidone-iodine irrigation and consecutively topical vancomycin powder will be used before wound closure. In group II, only povidone-iodine lavage irrigation will be used before wound closure. The primary outcome will be the incidence rate of PJI based on the number of patients with PJI occurrence within 90 days after arthroplasty. The occurrence will be determined using a combined approach, including reviewing hospital records for readmissions and follow-up phone interviews with patients. The infection will be diagnosed based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. The chi-square test will be used to compare the infection rates between the two studied groups. Risk and odds ratios for the between-groups comparison purposes will also be estimated. Medical cost analysis will also be performed.

DISCUSSION

A randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine irrigation and vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine irrigation alone in preventing PJIs after primary arthroplasty is crucial to advancing knowledge in orthopedic surgery, improving patient outcomes, and guiding evidence-based clinical practices.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05972603 . Registered on 2 August 2023.

Vancomycin powder in the prevention of infection in primary knee and hip arthroplasty: Case-control study with 1151 arthroplasties

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Vancomycin powder (VP) has been positively used in spinal surgery to reduce the rate of infections. Hardly any data have been published on hip and knee joint replacement surgery, and its usefulness is questioned. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of VP in reducing prosthetic infection and its possible complications.

METHODS

Primary hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasties were reviewed, performed by five surgeons in one hospital center, between 2017 and 2018. 1g of VP was used on the implant prior to surgical closure based on the surgeon's preferences. With a 5-year follow-up in which the infection rate and local complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred and fifty one arthroplasties were performed, 748 were TKA and 403 were THA. Nine patients were diagnosed with prosthetic infection, of which five received VP and four did not (P=.555). Likewise, another 15 patients suffered wound complications, of which 11 received VP and 4 did not (P=.412). There were no differences, either, in the rest of the complications depending on the use or not of VP (P=.101). Likewise, the number of patients who needed reintervention was similar (P=.999). No systemic complications were detected due to the use of VP.

CONCLUSIONS

It has not been possible to demonstrate that the use of VP reduces the rates of prosthetic infection in the hip and knee, so we cannot recommend its use.

[Translated article] Vancomycin powder in the prevention of infection in primary knee and hip arthroplasty: Case-control study with 1151 arthroplasties

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Vancomycin powder (VP) has been positively used in spinal surgery to reduce the rate of infections. Hardly any data have been published on hip and knee joint replacement surgery, and its usefulness is questioned. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of VP in reducing prosthetic infection and its possible complications.

METHODS

Primary hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasties were reviewed, performed by five surgeons in one hospital centre, between 2017 and 2018. One gram of VP was used on the implant prior to surgical closure based on the surgeon's preferences. With a 5-year follow-up in which the infection rate and local complications were analysed.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred and fifty-one arthroplasties were performed, 748 were TKA and 403 were THA. Nine patients were diagnosed with prosthetic infection, of which five received VP and four did not (p=0.555). Likewise, another 15 patients suffered wound complications, of which 11 received VP and 4 did not (p=0.412). There were no differences, either, in the rest of the complications depending on the use or not of VP (p=0.101). Likewise, the number of patients who needed reintervention was similar (p=0.999). No systemic complications were detected due to the use of VP.

CONCLUSIONS

It has not been possible to demonstrate that the use of VP reduces the rates of prosthetic infection in the hip and knee, so we cannot recommend its use.

Does Topical Vancomycin Powder Use in Fracture Surgery Change Bacteriology and Antibiotic Susceptibilities? An Analysis of the VANCO Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intrawound vancomycin changes the bacteriology of surgical site infection pathogens and investigate the emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

METHODS

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of phase III, prospective, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Thirty-six US trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients who became infected after fixation of tibial plateau or pilon fracture.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Pathogen types and bacterial susceptibilities as determined from routine clinical culture in the operating room.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were studied who were 67.5% male with a mean age of 48.6 years. A lower proportion of gram-positive cocci was observed in the vancomycin powder compared with the standard-of-care group (3.7% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.01). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection incidence was comparable in both the vancomycin powder and the standard-of-care groups, but rates of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus infections were lower in the treatment group (1.4% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.01). The incidence of coagulase-negative Staphylococci and gram-negative rod infections were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in susceptibilities between groups in rates of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical vancomycin powder decreases the likelihood of gram-positive infections consistent with the biologic activity of vancomycin. Fewer methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci infections were observed in the group treated with vancomycin powder. An effect of vancomycin powder on methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection risk was not detected given the low incidence in both the intrawound vancomycin and the standard-of-care groups. There was no emergence of gram-negative rod infections or increased resistance patterns observed. Use of topical vancomycin powder does not seem to produce infections in these patients with greater antibiotic resistance than would have occurred without its use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Demographics and Early Outcomes of Commercial Antibiotic Cement Usage for Infection Prophylaxis During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 65 Years: An American Joint Replacement Registry Study

INTRODUCTION

The use of antibiotic-laden bone cement (ALBC) for infection prophylaxis in the setting of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Using data from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR), (1) we examined the demographics of ALBC usage in the United States and (2) identified the effect of prophylactic commercially available ALBC on early revision and readmission for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary TKA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of the AJRR from 2017 to 2020. Patients older than 65 years undergoing primary cemented TKA with or without the use of commercially available antibiotic cement were eligible for inclusion (N = 251,506 patients). Data were linked to available Medicare claims to maximize revision outcomes. Demographics including age, sex, race/ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), preoperative inflammatory arthritis, region, and body mass index (BMI) class were recorded. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between the two outcome measures and ALBC usage.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing cemented TKA with ALBC were more likely to be Non-Hispanic Black ( P < 0.001), have a CCI of 2 or 3 ( P < 0.001), reside in the South ( P < 0.001), and had a higher mean BMI ( P < 0.001). In the regression models, ALBC usage was associated with increased risk of 90-day revision for PJI (hazards ratio 2.175 [95% confidence interval] 1.698 to 2.787) ( P < 0.001) and was not associated with 90-day all-cause readmissions. Male sex, higher CCI, and BMI >35 were all independently associated with 90-day revision for PJI.

DISCUSSION

The use of commercial ALBC in patients older than 65 years for primary TKA in the AJRR was not closely associated with underlying comorbidities suggesting that hospital-level and surgeon-level factors influence its use. In addition, ALBC use did not decrease the risk of 90-day revision for PJI and was not associated with 90-day readmission rates.

Effect of topical antibiotics on the prevention and management of wound infections: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis research was implemented to appraise the effect of topical antibiotics (TAs) on the prevention and management of wound infections (WIs). Inclusive literature research was performed until April 2023, and 765 interconnected researches were reviewed. The 11 selected researches included 6500 persons with uncomplicated wounds at the starting point of the research: 2724 of them were utilising TAs, 3318 were utilising placebo and 458 were utilising antiseptics. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilised to appraise the consequence of TAs on the prevention and management of WIs by the dichotomous approach and a fixed or random model. TAs had significantly lower WI compared with placebo (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92, p = 0.02) and compared with antiseptics (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.88, p = 0.01) in persons with uncomplicated wounds (UWs). TAs had significantly lower WIs compared with placebo and antiseptics in persons with UWs. However, caution needs to be taken when interacting with their values because of the low sample size of some of the chosen researches and low number of researches found for the comparisons in the meta-analysis.

Intrawound vancomycin powder in orthopaedic surgery as surgical site wound infection prophylaxis: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis research was executed to appraise the consequence of intrawound vancomycin powder (IWVP) in orthopaedic surgery (OPS) as surgical site wound infection (SSWI) prophylaxis. Inclusive literature research till March 2023 was carried out and 2756 interconnected researches were revised. Of the 18 picked researches enclosed 13 214 persons with OPS were in the used researches' starting point, 5798 of them were utilising IWVP, and 7416 were control. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to appraise the consequence of the IWVP in OPS as SSWI prophylaxis by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. IWVP had significantly lower SSWIs (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.74, P < .001), deep SSWIs (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.91, P = .02), and superficial SSWIs (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98, P = .04) compared with control in persons with OPS. IWVP had significantly lower SSWIs, deep SSWIs, and superficial SSWIs compared with control in persons with OPS. However, when interacting with its values, caution must be taken and more research is needed to confirm this finding.

Intraarticular vancomycin decreased the risk of acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection without increasing complication in primary total joint arthroplasty-a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the preventive effect of intraarticularly administered vancomycin on acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent unilateral primary TJA were prospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into vancomycin group and control group according to whether 1 g of vancomycin powder suspended in 30 ml normal saline was intraarticularly administered after arthrotomy closure. Acute postoperative PJI and aseptic wound complication were evaluated within 3 months postoperatively. Vancomycin-associated toxicity including acute renal failure, ototoxicity and anaphylaxis was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In terms of demographic parameters and comorbidities, no significant difference was found between the two groups. Intra-articular vancomycin significantly lowered the risk of acute postoperative PJI after primary TJA (P = 0.015) and primary total knee arthroplasty (P = 0.031). However, for patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty, the PJI rate was comparable between the two groups. Overall, the risk of aseptic wound complication between the two groups was also similar. Vancomycin-associated acute renal injury, ototoxicity, or anaphylaxis was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular injection of 1 g of vancomycin suspension after arthrotomy closure during TJA lowered the risk of acute postoperative PJI without increasing the risk of aseptic wound complication and vancomycin-associated systemic toxicity.

Use of topical vancomycin powder in total joint arthroplasty: Why the current literature is inconsistent?

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but terrible complication in hip and knee arthroplasty, and the use of topical vancomycin powder (VP) has been investigated as a tool to potentially reduce its incidence. However, there remains no consensus on its efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an overview on the application of topical vancomycin in orthopaedic surgery focusing on the recent evidence and results in total joint arthroplasty. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses on topical VP in hip and knee arthroplasty have been recently published reporting sometimes conflicting results. Apart from all being limited by the quality of the included studies (mostly level III and IV), confounding variables are often included potentially leading to biased conclusions. If taken into consideration the exclusive use of VP in isolation, the available data, although very limited, suggest that it does not reduce the infection rate in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Therefore, we still cannot advise for a routinary application. A properly powered randomized-controlled trial would be necessary to clarify the role of VP in hip and knee arthroplasty. Based on the analysis of the current evidence, the use of topical VP appears to be safe when used locally in terms of systemic adverse reactions, hence, if proven to be effective, it could bring great benefits due to its low cost and accessibility.

Effect of powdered vancomycin on stopping surgical site wound infections in neurosurgery: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of powdered vancomycin on stopping surgical site wound infections in neurosurgery. A systematic literature search up to July 2022 was performed and 24 137 subjects with neurosurgery at the baseline of the studies; 10 496 of them were using the powdered vancomycin, and 13 641 were not using the powdered vancomycin as a control. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of powdered vancomycin on stopping surgical site wound infections in neurosurgery using dichotomous methods with a random or fixed-effect model. The powdered vancomycin had significantly lower surgical site wound infections after spinal surgery (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.41-0.70, P < .001), deep surgical site wound infections after spinal surgery (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.35-0.57, P < .001), superficial surgical site wound infections after spinal surgery (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.83, P = .002), and surgical site wound infections after cranial surgery (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.61, P < .001) compared to control in subjects with neurosurgery. The powdered vancomycin had significantly lower surgical site wound infections after spinal surgery, deep surgical site wound infections after spinal surgery, superficial surgical site wound infections after spinal surgery, and surgical site wound infections after cranial surgery compared to control in subjects with neurosurgery. The analysis of outcomes should be done with caution even though the low number of studies with low sample size, 3 out of the 42 studies, in the meta-analysis, and a low number of studies in certain comparisons.

Locally delivered antistaphylococcal lysin exebacase or CF-296 is active in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus implant-associated osteomyelitis

Abstract. Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of orthopedic infections and can be challenging to treat, especially in the presence of a foreign body. The antistaphylococcal lysins exebacase and CF-296 have rapid bactericidal activity, a low propensity for resistance development, and synergize with some antibiotics. Methods: Rabbit implant-associated osteomyelitis was induced by drilling into the medial tibia followed by locally delivering exebacase, CF-296, or lysin carrier. A titanium screw colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) IDRL-6169 was inserted. Intravenous daptomycin or saline was administered and continued daily for 4 d. On day 5, rabbits were euthanized, and the tibiae and implants were collected for culture. Results were reported as log10 colony forming units (cfu) per gram of bone or log10 cfu per implant, and comparisons among the six groups were performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Based on implant and bone cultures, all treatments resulted in significantly lower bacterial counts than those of controls (P≤0.0025). Exebacase alone or with daptomycin as well as CF-296 with daptomycin were more active than daptomycin alone (P≤0.0098) or CF-296 alone (P≤0.0154) based on implant cultures. CF-296 with daptomycin was more active than either CF-296 alone (P=0.0040) or daptomycin alone (P=0.0098) based on bone cultures. Conclusion: Local delivery of either exebacase or CF-296 offers a promising complement to conventional antibiotics in implant-associated infections.