Pin-Related Complications in Computer Navigated and Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

An Instrumented Hammer to Detect the Bone Transitions During an High Tibial Osteotomy: An Animal Study

High tibial osteotomy is a common procedure for knee osteoarthritis during which the surgeon partially opens the tibia and must stop impacting when cortical bone is reached by the osteotome. Surgeons rely on their proprioception and fluoroscopy to conduct the surgery. Our group has developed an instrumented hammer to assess the mechanical properties of the material surrounding the osteotome tip. The aim of this ex vivo study is to determine whether this hammer can be used to detect the transition from cortical to trabecular bone and vice versa. Osteotomies were performed until rupture in pig tibia using the instrumented hammer. An algorithm was developed to detect both transitions based on the relative variation of an indicator derived from the time variation of the force. The detection by the algorithm of both transitions was compared with the position of the osteotome measured with a video camera and with surgeon proprioception. The difference between the detection of the video and the algorithm (respectively, the video and the surgeon; the surgeon and the algorithm) is 1.0±1.5 impacts (respectively, 0.5±0.6 impacts; 1.4±1.8 impacts), for the detection of the transition from the cortical to trabecular bone. For the transition from the trabecular to cortical bone, the difference is 3.6±2.6 impacts (respectively, 3.9±2.4 impacts; 0.8±0.9 impacts), and the detection by the algorithm was always done before the sample rupture. This ex vivo study demonstrates that this method could prevent impacts leading to hinge rupture.

Watch out your pins! Periprosthetic femoral fracture at tracking pin site early after robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty treated with dual nail-plate fixation

Robotic-assisted orthopedic surgeries are gaining popularity due to several factors such as its potential for enhanced precision and alignment in prosthetic implant placement, as well as its better pain control and reduction in hospital stay time. However, complications such as pin-related periprosthetic fractures, though rare, highlight the importance of technical precision during pin placement and adequate postoperative monitoring. We present the case of a 76-year-old obese female patient who presented to the Emergency Department with severe pain and deformity around the knee two months after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty following a fall from standing height. Radiographs revealed a displaced femoral periprosthetic fracture at tracking pin sites without associated implant instability. Surgical management involved combined nail-plate fixation, which promoted both early weight-bearing and functional recovery. At one year postoperatively, the patient achieved satisfactory fracture healing and functional outcomes, with a Knee Society Score of 92 and an EuroQol-5D index value of 0.78. Combined nail-plate osteosynthesis, though more invasive compared to other fixation methods, could be an effective strategy for managing distal femoral fractures following robotic-assisted arthroplasty, especially in obese and elderly patients, due to its biomechanical advantages, supporting early mobilization and weight-bearing with reliable fracture healing.

Cemented and Cementless Robotic-Assisted versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Single Center Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative-Based Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our study was to determine whether a difference existed between cemented and cementless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) and manual TKA with regard to revision rates and 90-day outcomes. We hypothesized these techniques would have similar results.

METHODS

A single center's data from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative were queried for all primary TKAs from January 2012 to July 2023. The RA-TKA and manual cohorts were compared for revisions and 90-day complications, including emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and returns to the operating room Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical data, and t-tests for continuous data. Of the 7,417 cemented TKAs (mean age 67 ± 9.6 years, 70% women), 273 were RA-TKA and 7,144 were manual. Of the 2,407 cementless TKAs (mean age 65 ± 8.6 years, 53% women), 730 were RA-TKA and 1,677 were manual.

RESULTS

Cemented RA-TKA had more periprosthetic joint infection revisions, more 90-day ED visits, and readmissions for wound complications compared to cemented manual TKA. Cementless RA-TKA had more 90-day readmissions for wound complications, while manual TKA had more 90-day ED visits for postoperative pain. Cemented and cementless RA-TKA had longer surgical time, shorter length of stay, and shorter time to revision. There were 283 revisions performed on cemented manual TKA (nine RA-TKAs, 3.2%, 274 manual, 3.8%, (P = 0.87)). There were 56 revisions performed on cementless knees (13 RA-TKAs, 1.7%, 43 manual 2.5% (P = 0.303)). Cumulative percent revision at 5 years was 3.9% for cemented RA-TKA, 3.5% for cemented manual TKA, 1.8% for cementless RA-TKA, and 2.8% for cementless manual TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Both RA-TKA and manual TKA have similar revision rates, while RA-TKA had more wound complications. Cementless RA-TKA may be beneficial in reducing postoperative pain.

How Often Does Technology Fail in Robotic-Assisted Arthroplasty? A Comprehensive Analysis of a United States Food and Drug Administration Database

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted arthroplasty is a growing alternative to conventionally instrumented arthroplasty; however, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) associated with this technology reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) remains poorly quantified. The objective of this study was to categorize AEs associated with robotic-assisted arthroplasty and calculate their annual incidence as reported to the FDA.

METHODS

The FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was queried for AEs from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 associated with the most prevalent robotic-arthroplasty system. The AEs were calculated using national surgical numbers provided by the manufacturer and grouped by total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or partial knee arthroplasty (PKA).

RESULTS

There were 1,710 unique AEs across the study period, with 436 THA, 1,005 TKA, and 269 PKA, representing incidence rates of 0.37, 0.30, and 0.40%, respectively. All procedures demonstrated lower rates of AEs in the final year of the study, compared to the first year. Most complications were related to mechanical problems, not software issues. Surgical delays due to AEs occurred in THA (0.13% cumulative incidence, 14.0 minutes average delay), TKA (0.13%, 20.6 minutes), and PKA (0.22%, 19.4 minutes). No cases were canceled due to AEs in THA, though a few TKA (0.003%) and PKA (0.02%) cases were not performed. Patient injuries occurred in 0.05, 0.05, and 0.08% of THA, TKA, and PKA, respectively. Surgical reintervention was necessary in 0.004, 0.003, and 0.01% of THA, TKA, and PKA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted arthroplasty has a small number and relatively low rate of AEs reported to the FDA as measured through the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database, with rates steadily decreasing over the study period. Patient injury, case delay, and reoperation represent only a small fraction of the already rare AEs in the database.

Is bicortical femoral pin insertion safe for image-based robotic knee arthroplasty surgery ? A comparative complications analysis in 970 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVES

Limited data exists on complications associated with robotic image-based system in knee arthroplasty. This study aims to document complications in robotic arm-assisted knee arthroplasties and evaluate the system's safety by comparing two femoral pin insertion methods: bicortical diaphyseal with additional stab wounds, and unicortical metaphyseal placement through the main incision.

METHODS

All patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty with the image-based robotic system (Mako, Stryker, Mako Surgical Corp., Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA) from 1st March 2021 to 31st January 2024 with a minimum follow-up of 2 months were included. Demographics, system and non-system-related complications, as well as outcomes were recorded. Complications were categorized as either major (requiring a second surgical intervention) or minor.

RESULTS

A total of 970 consecutive cases (median age 69.3 years) were analyzed. The unicortical group comprised 651 cases, while the bicortical group 319. The incidence of non-system-related complications was 2.37%, with the most common being joint stiffness (10 cases; 1.03%), followed by lateral femoral condyle fracture (4; 0.41%). The overall incidence of system-specific complications was 1.03%. Pin-related femoral fractures occurred in 0.2% of cases, all postoperatively and in the unicortical group. There was no statistically significant difference between the femoral pin insertion-related complication rates among the two groups (0.3% in the unicortical, compared to 0% in the bicortical group; p-value ​= ​0.3). Complications included tibia fracture (0.1%), delayed wound healing (0.2%), superficial wound infection (0.1%), tibia osteomyelitis (0.1%), and "exostosis" (0.2%). The major complications rate was 0.3% and minor 0.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal system-specific overall complications indicate that robotic arm-assisted surgery is safe. The bicortical diaphyseal femoral pin insertion method does not increase the complication rates compared to the unicortical metaphyseal method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Patient Perspective on Robotic-Assisted Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

Robotic-assisted total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has gained popularity in recent years. Despite mixed patient and surgeon perceptions, conflicting evidence regarding efficacy and cost-effectiveness in comparison to manual TJA exists. Patients' beliefs surrounding robotic-assisted TJA remain unclear. This study aims to assess patients' expectations on robotic technology in TJA.

Methods

A 9-question survey assessing patient understanding and expectations of the use of robotics in TJA was distributed to preoperative and postoperative hip and knee patients of five surgeons at a high-volume academic center. Responses were descriptively analyzed.

Results

A total of 498 responses were collected. Of all respondents, 69.1% are aware of robotic usage in TJA, 68.5% are interested but unsure of the benefits, and only 19.5% feel it is superior to manual surgery. Most patients did not consider robotic TJA as minimally invasive surgery, with 61.7% stating they are not the same. In addition, 52.3% were not comfortable with extra or longer incisions for robotic procedures. Regarding surgeon choice, 94.9% did not consider if the surgeon is able to perform robotic TJA, 74.4% wanted their surgeon proficient in manual TJA, and 72.4% felt that surgeons who use robotic technology are not more capable than manual surgeons.

Conclusions

Awareness and curiosity of robotic-assisted TJA exists; however, most patients did not appear to acknowledge superiority or benefits over manual surgery. Furthermore, patients appear to prefer surgeon proficiency in manual techniques, which may influence training programs in the future. Surgeons should weigh patient goals, expectations, outcomes, and costs when choosing to perform robotic TJA.

A Comparison of 90-Day Complication Rates Between Intra- and Extra-incisional Pin Sites in Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) platforms require tibial and femoral pins to support rigidly fixed navigation arrays. These pins can be placed inside or outside the primary incision. We sought to compare 90-day complication rates between three different pin configurations: all-outside, intra-incisional femur/extra-incisional tibia, and all-inside.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 2,880 patients undergoing robotic primary TKA was performed, including 1,004 patients (35%) with all-outside pins, 1,056 patients (37%) with intra-incisional femur/extra-incisional tibia pins, and 820 patients (29%) with all-inside pins. The primary outcomes were primary wound complications and pin-site wound complications within 90 days. Secondary outcomes were manipulations under anesthesia (MUAs) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).

RESULTS

There were 41 (2.0%) tibial pin-site wound complications and three (0.3%) femoral pin-site wound complications. There were 109 (3.8%) wound complications involving the primary incision. There was no difference in primary wound complication rates between the all-outside, intra-incisional femur/extra-incisional tibia, and all-inside groups (3.3 versus 3.9 versus 4.3%, P = 0.54). There were 18 major wound complications requiring reoperation or readmission; 13 of these involved the primary incision only, three involved the primary incision and tibial pin sites, and two involved the tibial pin sites only. There were no differences between the three groups in the rates of MUAs (4.1 versus 2.4 versus 3.4%, P = 0.09) or CRPS (0.1 versus 0.1 versus 0.6%, P = 0.06), respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic pin-related fractures in the study sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary wound complication rates were similar in patients who had pins placed outside or within the primary incision during robotic TKA. However, among patients who had extra-incisional tibial pins, there was an additional 2.0% risk of tibial pin site-related wound complications. All-inside pin placement did not lead to an increased risk of CRPS or MUAs compared to extra-incisional tibial pins.

Robotic total knee arthroplasty safely reduces length of stay in an Asian public healthcare system

Aims

Around the world, the emergence of robotic technology has improved surgical precision and accuracy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This territory-wide study compares the results of various robotic TKA (R-TKA) systems with those of conventional TKA (C-TKA) and computer-navigated TKA (N-TKA).

Methods

This is a retrospective study utilizing territory-wide data from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS). All patients who underwent primary TKA in all 47 public hospitals in Hong Kong between January 2021 and December 2023 were analyzed. Primary outcomes were the percentage use of various robotic and navigation platforms. Secondary outcomes were: 1) mean length of stay (LOS); 2) 30-day emergency department (ED) attendance rate; 3) 90-day ED attendance rate; 4) 90-day reoperation rate; 5) 90-day mortality rate; and 6) surgical time.

Results

A total of 8,492 knees from 7,746 patients were included in the study. Overall robotic use had risen to 20.4% (2023 Q3 to Q4: 355/1,738) by the end of 2023, with Mako being the most popular at 10.3% (179/1,738). R-TKA had the shortest mean LOS compared with N-TKA and C-TKA (5.5 vs 6.3 and 7.1 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Only Mako (9.7%) demonstrated reduced 90-day ED attendance compared to C-TKA (13.1%; p = 0.009), Cori/Navio (15.0%; p = 0.005), and Rosa (16.4%; p < 0.001). No differences in 90-day reoperation rate and mortality were observed between all groups. Mean surgical times were longer in R-TKA groups by 20.6 minutes (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

R-TKA use has increased in recent years, and has been shown to reduce hospital stay despite having a slightly longer surgical time, proving a promising candidate to alleviate the burden on healthcare systems. Individual differences between R-TKA systems contributed to variable clinical outcomes.

Effectiveness of Periarticular Pin Tracker Placement Through a Single Main Incision in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Technical Note and Short-Term Results

Background and Objectives: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is gaining popularity worldwide, leading to a potential increase in the number of pin tracker-related complications. This study determined the effectiveness of periarticular pin tracker placement in the distal femur and proximal tibia through a single main incision during robotic-assisted TKA over a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Materials and Methods: A consecutive series of 149 TKAs was performed in 108 patients using the triathlon posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis with a robotic-assisted system at our hospital from December 2023 to February 2024. Clinical outcomes and complications associated with pin tracker sites, including pin-site infection, neurovascular injury, hematoma, soft-tissue morbidity, and pin-site fracture, were assessed. Results: The mean Knee Society knee score improved from 42.5 preoperatively to 76.3 points at the final follow-up, whereas the mean Knee Society function score improved from 43.1 preoperatively to 78.1 points at the final follow-up (both p < 0.05). No patient experienced any minor or major complications related to the use of pin trackers in the distal femur and proximal tibia. Conclusions: This periarticular technique that uses pin trackers in the distal femur and proximal tibia through a single main incision could be a useful option for orthopedic surgeons while performing robotic-assisted TKA.

Surgical Technique for Complementing Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Middle-Aged Patients with Rigid Knee Bones

This study reports 12 cases of inaccurate bone cutting from a single-surgeon series of 509 consecutively performed robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for 1 year. In addition, a complementary technique with the combined benefits of robotic-assisted and manual techniques that address this issue is described. From June 2020 to May 2021, a consecutive series of 509 TKAs was performed on 338 patients using a posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis with a robotic-assisted system at our hospital. The surgical records were reviewed to identify the causative bone locations and bone re-cutting events correlated with improper trial instrument positioning. The re-cutting rate was 2.4% (12/509). All re-cutting attempts occurred because of improper cutting of the femoral posterior chamfer. Re-cutting was attempted mostly on middle-aged male patients. This complementary technique can facilitate manual bone cutting while retaining the advantages of robotic surgery during robotic-assisted TKA. Additionally, the combined technique of manual bone cutting and robotic-assisted surgery can be a useful alternative for middle-aged male patients with rigid knee bones.

Adverse events related to robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study from the MAUDE database

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted surgical technique has been clinically available for decades, yet real-world adverse events (AEs) and complications associated with primary knee arthroplasty remain unclear.

METHODS

In March 2023, we searched the FDA website and extracted AEs related to robotic assisted knee arthroplasty (RAKA) from the MAUDE database over the past 10 years. The "Brand Name" function queried major robotic platforms, including active and semi-active systems. The overall incidence of AEs was estimated based on annual surgical volume from the current American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR). Two authors independently collected data on event date, event type, device problem, and patient problem.

RESULTS

Of 839 eligible reports, device malfunction comprised mechanical failure (343/839, 40.88%) and software failure (261/839, 31.11%). For surgical complications, inappropriate bone resection (115/839, 13.71%) was most frequent, followed by bone/soft tissue damage (83/839, 9.89%). Notably, over-resection exceeding 2 mm (88/839, 10.49%), joint infection (25/839, 2.98%), and aseptic loosening (1/839, 0.12%) were major complications. Only two track pins related AEs were found. Moreover, the distribution of these AEs differed substantially between robot manufacturers. According to the AEs volume and AJRR data, the overall incidences of AEs related to RAKAs were calculated with 0.83% (839/100,892) between November 2010 and March 2023.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows that while reported AEs might be increasing for RAKAs, the overall rate remains relatively low. Reassuringly, device malfunction was the most commonly AEs observed, with a minor impact on postoperative outcomes. Furthermore, our data provide a benchmark for patients, surgeons, and manufacturers to evaluate RAKA performance, though continued improvement in reducing serious AEs incidence is warranted.

Robot-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty is Associated With an Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) aims to restore joint function and relieve pain. New technology, such as robot assistance, offers the potential to reduce human error, improve precision, and improve postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between conventional and robot-assisted THA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing a national database from 2016 to 2019. Patients undergoing THA, conventional or robot-assisted, were identified via the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code. Multivariate regressions were performed to assess outcomes between groups. Negative binomial regressions were performed to assess discharge disposition, readmission, and reoperation. Gamma regressions with log-link were used to assess total charges and lengths of hospital stays. Patient demographics and comorbidities, measured via the Elixhauser comorbidity index, were controlled for in our analyses. A total of 1,216,395 patients undergoing THA, 18,417 (1.51%) with robotic assistance, were identified.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing robot-assisted procedures had increased surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.31 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 1.53]; P < .001), including periprosthetic fracture (OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.35 to 1.98]; P < .001). Notably, these patients also had significantly greater total charges (OR 1.20 [95% CI 1.11 to 1.30]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic assistance in THA is associated with an increased risk of surgical complications, including periprosthetic fracture, while incurring greater charges.

STUDY DESIGN

Level III; Retrospective Cohort Study.

Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty in 2023

Over the past few decades, instrumentation and techniques for total knee arthroplasty have evolved from conventional manual tools to a wide range of technologies, including calibrated guides for accurate bone cuts and alignment, smart tools, dynamic intraoperative sensors for soft tissue balancing, patient-specific guides, computer navigation, and robotics. This review is intended to provide an overview of the latest advancements in total knee arthroplasty technology, address potential challenges and solutions related to the application of these technologies, and explore their limitations.

Complications and Learning Curve Associated with an Imageless Burr-Based (CORI) Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty System: Results from First 500 Cases

Background

The use of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is gaining traction. There is evidence to suggest that RA-TKA can help to optimize the precision and accuracy of implant positioning and that there may be protective effects on surrounding bony and soft tissues. Yet, there are important differences between the various RA-TKA systems currently on the market. One such newly introduced RA-TKA system uses imageless technology and performs bony cuts with the use of a burr-based device. The learning curve and complications unique to this system have yet to be assessed.

Methods

We evaluated 500 consecutive RA-TKA cases using a newly developed burr-based and imageless system which were done by a single surgeon between the months of October 2021 and February 2023. Operative times were recorded and compared to the previous 150 conventional TKA cases allowing for the learning curve to be calculated using the CUSUM method. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were categorically profiled.

Results

The learning curve of this RA-TKA system was found to be 6 cases. Intraoperative complications included unintended bony over resection (n = 3), soft tissue injury (n = 2), and robotic system hardware (n = 2) or software (n = 2) malfunction. Postoperative complications consisted of superficial pin site infection (n = 1) and periprosthetic fracture near the pin sites (n = 1). There were no identified cases of prosthetic joint infection, instability events, or wound complications.

Conclusions

The learning curve and the complication profile of a newly introduced imageless and burr-based RA-TKA system were described. This information serves to guide surgeons in adopting this technology and can counsel them regarding the potential pitfalls and challenges associated with its integration into practice. The work sheds light on the complexity and learning curve of the recently released imageless burr-based RA-TKA system. This important information is intended to help surgeons accept this cutting-edge technology by providing advice on any errors and difficulties that can occur when integrating it into clinical practice. This information can help surgeons navigate the complexities of integrating this new burr-based robotic technology into knee replacement procedures, enabling them to make well-informed decisions and receive guidance.

Robots on the Stage: A Snapshot of the American Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Market

» Computer-assisted robots aid orthopaedic surgeons in implant positioning and bony resection. Surgeons selecting a robot for their practice are faced with numerous options. This study aims to make the choice less daunting by reviewing the most commonly used Food and Drug Administration-approved robotic total knee arthroplasty platforms in the American arthroplasty market.» Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) robots use computer guidance to create a virtual knee model that serves as the surgeon's canvas for resection planning.» Most available robotic TKA (rTKA) systems are closed semiactive systems that restrict implant use to those of the manufacturer.» Each system has distinct imaging requirements, safety features, resection methods, and operating room footprints that will affect a surgeon's technique and practice.» Robots carry different purchase, maintenance, and equipment costs that will influence patient access across different socioeconomic groups.» Some studies show improved early patient-reported outcomes with rTKA, but long-term studies have yet to show clinical superiority over manual TKA.

Intraincisional Pin Placement is Safe for Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

While robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has seen a major increase in its utilization, it requires bone array pins to be fixed into the femur and tibia, which intrinsically carries a risk. As it is currently off-label with some robotic platforms to place pins intraincisional, we aimed to evaluate the safety of intraincisional pin placement during RA-TKAs.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 2,343 patients who underwent RA-TKA at a North American Healthcare System between January 2018 and March 2022 was included. Primary outcomes included periprosthetic fracture or infection (eg, superficial or deep). Secondary outcomes included 1-year reoperation rate due to any cause. Cases were retrospectively reviewed to determine whether complications could be attributed to metaphyseal intraincisional pin placement (4.0 mm pins; two tibial and two femoral). The 90-day follow-up was 100% and the 1-year follow-up rate was 70.6% (n = 1,655).

RESULTS

The pin-site related periprosthetic fracture incidence at 90 days was 0.09% (2 out of 2,343). The 90-day infection incidence was 1.4% (superficial: 22; deep: 13). The 1-year reoperation rate was 1.8% (29 out of 1,655). The most common causes of reoperation at 1-year were deep infection (n = 14; 0.83%), superficial infection (n = 3; 0.18%), periprosthetic fracture, mechanical symptoms, instability, and hematoma (n = 2; 0.12% for each).

CONCLUSIONS

One in 1,172 patients may experience a pin-related periprosthetic fracture after RA-TKA with intraincisional bone array pin placement. There was a low 90-day infection incidence and reoperations within 1-year after RA-TKA were rare.

Troubleshooting Robotics During Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

The introduction of new surgical technology highlights appreciable concerns; robotic arthroplasty is no exception. Acquiring comprehensive understanding of the robotic technology to avoid complications during surgery and devising troubleshooting strategies to overcome potential difficulties is of paramount importance. Troubleshooting algorithms depend on the stage of the procedure and problem encountered, such as loosening of the pins or array, registration or verification problems, or malfunctioning of the device, which is rare. This article aims to outline reproducible workflows and solutions for troubleshooting during robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty.

Technological innovations in shoulder replacement: current concepts and the future of robotics in total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been rapidly evolving over the last several decades, with innovative technological strategies being investigated and developed in order to achieve optimal component precision and joint alignment and stability, preserve implant longevity, and improve patient outcomes. Future advancements such as robotic-assisted surgeries, augmented reality, artificial intelligence, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and other peri- and preoperative planning tools will continue to revolutionize TSA. Robotic-assisted arthroplasty is a novel and increasingly popular alternative to the conventional arthroplasty procedure in the hip and knee but has not yet been investigated in the shoulder. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review of the literature on the evolution and projected trends of technological advances and robotic assistance in total shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

A narrative synthesis method was employed for this review, rather than a meta-analysis or systematic review of the literature. This decision was based on 2 primary factors: (1) the lack of eligible, peer-reviewed studies with high-quality level of evidence available for review on robotic-assisted shoulder arthroplasty, and (2) a narrative review allows for a broader scope of content analysis, including a comprehensive review of all technological advances-including robotics-within the field of TSA. A general literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. These databases were queried by 2 independent reviewers from database inception through November 11, 2022, for all articles investigating the role of robotics and technology assistance in total shoulder arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria included studies describing "shoulder arthroplasty" and "robotics."

RESULTS

After exclusion criteria were applied, 4 studies on robotic-assisted TSA were described in the review. Given the novelty of this technology and limited data on robotics in TSA, these studies consisted of a literature review, nonvalidated experimental biomechanical studies in sawbones models, and preclinical proof-of-concept cadaveric studies using prototype robotic technology primarily in conjunction with PSI. The remaining studies described the technological advancements in TSA, including PSI, computer-assisted navigation, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and virtual, augmented, and mixed reality. Although not yet commercially available, robotic-assisted TSA confers the theoretical advantages of precise humeral head cuts for restoration of proximal humerus anatomy, more accurate glenoid preparation, and improved soft-tissue assessment in limited early studies.

CONCLUSION

The evidence for the use of robotics in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty demonstrates improved component accuracy, more precise radiographic measurements, and improved early/mid-term patient-reported and functional outcomes. Although no such data currently exist for shoulder arthroplasty given that the technology has not yet been commercialized, the lessons learned from robotic hip and knee surgery in conjunction with its rapid adoption suggests robotic-assisted TSA is on the horizon of innovation. By achieving a better understanding of the past, present, and future innovations in TSA through this narrative review, orthopedic surgeons can be better prepared for future applications.

[Translated article] Current situation of robotics in knee prosthetic surgery: A technology that has come to stay?

Robotic surgery is a surgical technique that is on the rise. The goal of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is to provide the surgeon with a tool to accurately execute bone cuts according to previous surgical planning to restore knee kinematics and balance of soft tissue, being able to precisely apply the type of alignment that we choose. In addition, RA-TKA is a very useful tool for training. Within the limitations, there is the learning curve, the need for specific equipment, the high cost of the devices, the increase in radiation in some systems and that each robot is linked to a specific type of implant. Current studies show, with RA-TKA, variations in the alignment of the mechanical axis are reduced, postoperative pain is improved and earlier discharge is facilitated. On the other hand, there are no differences in terms of range of motion, alignment, gap balance, complications, surgical time or functional results.

A comparison of pin site complications between large and small pin diameters in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty typically necessitates use of tracking pins, which can vary in diameter. Complications such as infections and fractures at the pin-site have been observed, but clarification of the effect of pin diameter on complication is needed. The aim of this study is to compare the pin-related complication rates following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty between 4.5 mm and 3.2 mm diameter pins.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 90-day pin-site complication rates after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty were compared between 4.5 mm diameter and 3.2 mm diameter groups. In total, 367 patients were included: 177 with large pin diameter and 190 with small pin diameter. All four pin sites were evaluated using postoperative radiographs. Cases without orthogonal views or visualization of all four pin tracts were noted. Multivariate logistic regression was used to control for age, which differed between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

The rate of pin-site complications was 5.6% in the large pin diameter cohort and 2.6% in the small pin diameter cohort, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. The adjusted odds ratio for complications in small compared to large diameter group was 0.48, with a p-value of 0.18. The most common pin-site complication was infection/persistent drainage, found in 1.9% of patients, followed by intraoperative fracture of the second cortex in 1.4%. Intraoperative fracture could not be ruled out in 96 cases due to inadequate radiographic visualization of all pin sites. There was one postoperative pin-site fracture in the large diameter cohort, which required operative fixation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates no statistically significant difference in pin-site complication rates after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty between 4.5 mm and 3.2 mm pin diameter cohorts, although there was a trend towards increased intraoperative and postoperative pin-site fractures in the 4.5 mm group.

Where are We Now and What are We Hoping to Achieve with Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) has been developed to improve knee kinematics and functional outcomes, expedite recovery, and improve implants long-term survivorship. Robotic devices are classified into active, semi-active, and passive, based on their degree of freedom. Their capacity to provide increased accuracy in implants positioning with reduced radiographic outliers has been widely proved. However, these early advantages are yet to be associated with long-term survivorship. Moreover, multiple drawbacks are still encountered including a variable learning curve, increased setup and maintenance costs, and potential complications related to the surgical technique. Despite recent technologies applied to TKA have failed to prove substantial improvements, robotic-assisted surgery seems to be here to stay and revolutionize the field of TKA. To support its consistent usage on a daily basis, long-term results are still awaited, and further improvements are necessary to reduce the expenses related to it.

[Market overview: Robotic-assisted arthroplasty : Current robotic systems, learning curve and cost analysis]

Robotic-assisted arthroplasty has been rapidly entering clinical routine in recent years. The leading endoprosthesis manufacturers have all meanwhile placed robotic systems on the market, which, however, differ significantly from one another technically. Current systems are currently classified according to the degree of autonomy (active vs. semi-active vs. passive) and the data/image source (image-based: CT vs. X‑ray, imageless). Some systems already offer the possibility of robotic-assisted or navigated implantation of hip endoprostheses. In the following review article, the currently leading robotic systems will be presented and compared with regard to their characteristics. Furthermore, the analysis of the learning curves for the different systems, currently available cost analysis models and an outlook on future developments and challenges will be given.