1
|
McNamara CA, Wininger AE, Sullivan TC, Brown TS, Clyburn TA, Incavo SJ, Park KJ. The AAHKS Best Podium Presentation Research Award: Intraosseous Vancomycin Reduces the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2025:S0883-5403(25)00453-X. [PMID: 40339929 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2025] [Accepted: 04/27/2025] [Indexed: 05/10/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prior literature supports the intraosseous (IO) delivery of vancomycin as a safe and effective technique for primary TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its efficacy for aseptic revision of TKA. METHODS A single-institution retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA from May 2016 to October 2023. Vancomycin was administered through an intravenous (IV) route in 386 cases and via an IO infusion in 333 cases. The IV cohort received a 15 mg/kg dose of vancomycin before skin incision. The IO cohort received a 500 mg dose of vancomycin infused into the tibia after tourniquet inflation. All patients also received a weight-based dose of IV cefazolin perioperatively. Patient characteristics, surgical details, and infection-related data were extracted during chart review. The PJI diagnosis was based on the 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Fisher's exact tests and Chi-square analyses were used to compare categorical outcomes. RESULTS The incidence of PJI was significantly lower in the IO cohort compared to the IV cohort at 30-day (0.3 versus 2.1%, P = 0.03), 90-day (0.9 versus 3.1%, P = 0.04), and 1-year follow-up (1.6 versus 4.9%, P = 0.04). There were no reported adverse reactions to vancomycin. There were no differences in the incidence of acute kidney injury (2.7 versus 2.9%, P = 0.90), deep venous thrombosis (1.2 versus 1.8%, P = 0.56), or pulmonary embolism (0 versus 0.3%, P = 1.0) between groups. CONCLUSIONS Use of IO vancomycin infusion is a safe and effective alternative to IV administration for patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA. Furthermore, IO vancomycin optimized the efficiency of vancomycin administration in this high-risk surgical cohort and resulted in a significant reduction in the rate of PJI through 1-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin A McNamara
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine 6445 Main St. Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, Texas 77030; University of Miami Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1611 NW 12th Ave #303, Miami, FL 33136
| | - Austin E Wininger
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine 6445 Main St. Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Thomas C Sullivan
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine 6445 Main St. Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Timothy S Brown
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine 6445 Main St. Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Terry A Clyburn
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine 6445 Main St. Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Stephen J Incavo
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine 6445 Main St. Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Kwan J Park
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine 6445 Main St. Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, Texas 77030.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
R S, P S, Gh S, S B, M E, Ja B. Analysis of systemic serum vancomycin levels following intraarticular application in primary total joint arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 145:60. [PMID: 39694929 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05688-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PJI accounts for 15-25% of revision surgeries, therefore it is associated with PJI is associated with substantial patient morbidity and mortality as well as increased healthcare expenditures due to complex treatment strategies. Recently, intraoperative local application of vancomycin powder is increasingly being used in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) as an additive strategy for PJI prevention. Whereas local vancomycin concentrations have already been investigated in prior studies, evidence on systemic vancomycin levels and potential adverse drug reactions (ADR) is limited. Purpose of this study was to investigate systemic vancomycin levels following intraarticular application in primary TJA. MATERIALS AND METHODS This pilot study is a prospective analysis of patients undergoing primary THA and TKA between April and July 2023. One gram of vancomycin powder was applied to the prosthesis prior to wound closure. Serum vancomycin levels were measured at two standardised time points, 24 and 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS In total, 103 patients were included, and the patient collective was further stratified by surgical procedure into a THA subgroup (n = 52) and a TKA subgroup (n = 51). Mean serum vancomycin levels showed a significant group difference at both time points (24 h: p < 0.001; 48 h: p = 0.044) with higher serum vancomycin concentrations in the THA cohort. Mean serum vancomycin levels in THA patients were 1.25 μg/ml (range 0.00-7.00 μg/ml) after 24 h and 0.34 μg/ml (range 0.00-4.80 μg/ml) 48 h postoperatively. In TKA, no systemic vancomycin levels were detected. Vancomycin concentrations did not reach therapeutic levels in any patient. No ADR was detected in the whole study collective. CONCLUSION Following intraarticular administration of vancomycin powder, no systemic vancomycin levels within the therapeutic range were detected, thus it may serve as a safe and cost-effective adjunct to strategies for prevention of PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stauss R
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Orthopaedics at Campus Pius-Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Georgstraße 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.
| | - Savov P
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Orthopaedics at Campus Pius-Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Georgstraße 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Seeber Gh
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Orthopaedics at Campus Pius-Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Georgstraße 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Brand S
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Orthopaedics at Campus Pius-Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Georgstraße 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Ettinger M
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Orthopaedics at Campus Pius-Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Georgstraße 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Beheshty Ja
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Orthopaedics at Campus Pius-Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Georgstraße 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fontalis A, Yasen AT, Giebaly DE, Luo TD, Magan A, Haddad FS. Optimizing debridement and implant retention in acute periprosthetic joint infections. Bone Joint J 2024; 106-B:1377-1384. [PMID: 39615530 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b12.bjj-2024-0282.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2025]
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a complex challenge in orthopaedic surgery associated with substantial morbidity and healthcare expenditures. The debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) protocol is a viable treatment, offering several advantages over exchange arthroplasty. With the evolution of treatment strategies, considerable efforts have been directed towards enhancing the efficacy of DAIR, including the development of a phased debridement protocol for acute PJI management. This article provides an in-depth analysis of DAIR, presenting the outcomes of single-stage, two-stage, and repeated DAIR procedures. It delves into the challenges faced, including patient heterogeneity, pathogen identification, variability in surgical techniques, and antibiotics selection. Moreover, critical factors that influence the decision-making process between single- and two-stage DAIR protocols are addressed, including team composition, timing of the intervention, antibiotic regimens, and both anatomical and implant-related considerations. By providing a comprehensive overview of DAIR protocols and their clinical implications, this annotation aims to elucidate the advancements, challenges, and potential future directions in the application of DAIR for PJI management. It is intended to equip clinicians with the insights required to effectively navigate the complexities of implementing DAIR strategies, thereby facilitating informed decision-making for optimizing patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Fontalis
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Adam T Yasen
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dia E Giebaly
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tianyi D Luo
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Orthopaedics Northeast, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Ahmed Magan
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fares S Haddad
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
- The Bone & Joint Journal , London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Viswanathan VK, Patralekh MK, Iyengar KP, Jain VK. Intraosseous regional antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA): Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2024; 57:102553. [PMID: 39435324 PMCID: PMC11490936 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background A major catastrophic adverse event after total joint arthroplasty surgery (TJA) is the periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). In the recent years, regional antibiotic prophylaxis has gained momentum as a novel infection control strategy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with different purported benefits over systemic administration. The current article was planned to comprehensively review the available evidence in literature; as well as compare the safety and effectiveness of intraosseous (IO) antibiotic prophylaxis with systemic prophylaxis in patients undergoing TJA. Methods An independent database (5 databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane library) search was performed (on January 1, 2024) using suitable key words [PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023458219)]. All randomised controlled trials (RCT), prospective or retrospective studies reporting data on intraosseous vancomycin or other antibiotics during arthroplasty for prophylaxis of PJI were considered. Studies not pertaining to the topic of interest or non-clinical trials were excluded. The evaluated outcome parameters included PJI incidence, systemic antibiotic levels, minimal inhibitory concentrations, local antibiotic concentrations achieved in soft tissues (or fat) and bone; and associated complications. While the "risk of bias" was evaluated using ROB-2 tool and MINORS criteria; LibreOffice version (v)7.5.6 was utilized for data management. OpenMeta-analyst v5.26.14 and RevMan v5.4 software were employed for meta-analysis. Results Following our literature search, 11 studies (1 prospective series, 6 RCT and 4 retrospective studies) were finally identified. Based on our meta-analysis, there was statistically higher antibiotic concentration in the bone [mean difference (MD):25.12 μg/g;95%CI:10.32,39.91;z=3.33,p = 0.0009] and local fat tissues [MD:22.01 μg/g;95%CI:1.71,32.30;z=4.19,p < 0.0001) following IO prophylaxis, as compared with the systemic drug administration. IO prophylaxis was also associated with a significant reduction in prosthetic joint infections (PJI; April 1633 and 25/2213 patients developed PJI in IO and systemic prophylaxis groups, respectively; p = 0.006). There was significant difference in gram-positive infections between IO and systemic prophylaxis groups (2/1123 and 13/1753 g + ve infections in IO and systemic prophylaxis groups, respectively; p = 0.05). Our review and meta-analysis revealed no substantial difference in complications amongst the groups (p = 0.66). Conclusion IO antibiotic prophylaxis appears to be an effective and safe strategy in patients undergoing TJA. IO access provides substantially enhanced antibiotic elution into the local tissues (bone and soft tissues); and consequently, results in reduced of PJI rates after TJA (in comparison with conventional systemic antibiotic prophylaxis).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Karthikeyan P. Iyengar
- Department of Orthopaedics, Southport and Ormskirk Hospitals, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching NHS Trust, Southport, PR86PN, UK
| | - Vijay Kumar Jain
- Department of Orthopaedics, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, 110001, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Howard LC, Sheridan GA. What's New in Hip Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2024; 106:1645-1652. [PMID: 39052695 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.24.00676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa C Howard
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wininger AE, Gurusamy P, Sullivan TC, Serpelloni S, Taraballi F, Park KJ, Brown TS. Intraosseous Versus Intravenous Vancomycin in Tourniquetless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:S224-S228. [PMID: 38462143 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraosseous (IO) administration of vancomycin at the time of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to be safer and more effective than intravenous (IV) administration at preventing early periprosthetic joint infection. Previous studies have relied on tourniquet inflation to enhance local tissue concentrations and mitigate systemic release. METHODS A single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was performed on 20 patients (10 IV, 10 IO) undergoing primary TKA. The control (IV) group received weight-dosed vancomycin approximately 1 hour prior to the incision and weight-dosed cefazolin immediately prior to the incision. The interventional (IO) group received weight-dosed cefazolin immediately prior to the incision and 500 mg of vancomycin delivered via the IO technique at the time of the incision. Systemic samples for vancomycin levels were taken prior to the incision and at closure. During the procedure, tissue samples were taken from the distal femur, proximal tibia, and suprapatellar synovium. There were no differences in patient demographics or changes in serum creatinine from preoperative to postoperatively between groups. RESULTS Significant differences in systemic vancomycin levels (ug/mL) were found at the start of the case (IV = 27.9 ± 4.9 versus IO = 0 ± 0, P = .0004) and at the end of the case (IV = 19.6 ± 2.6 versus IO = 7.8 ± 1.0, P = .001). No significant differences were seen in the average vancomycin concentration in the distal femur (IV = 61.0 ± 16.0 versus IO = 66.2 ± 12.3, P = .80), proximal tibia (IV = 52.8 ± 13.5 versus IO = 57.1 ± 17.0, P = .84), or suprapatellar synovial tissue (IV = 10.7 ± 5.3 versus IO = 9.0 ± 3.3, P = .80). There were no complications associated with vancomycin administration in either group. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the utility of IO vancomycin in tourniquetless TKA with similar local tissue and significantly lower systemic concentrations than IV administration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 1 therapeutic randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin E Wininger
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Pradyumna Gurusamy
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas C Sullivan
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Stefano Serpelloni
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Francesca Taraballi
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Kwan J Park
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Timothy S Brown
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Otero JE, Dombrowski ME, Brown TS, Courtney PM, Kamath AF, Nandi S, Fehring KA. What's New in Musculoskeletal Infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2024; 106:1249-1255. [PMID: 38781349 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.24.00230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse E Otero
- OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Malcolm E Dombrowski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Timothy S Brown
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Atul F Kamath
- Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sumon Nandi
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Keith A Fehring
- OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Serpelloni S, Williams ME, Caserta S, Sharma S, Rahimi M, Taraballi F. Electrospun Chitosan-Based Nanofibrous Coating for the Local and Sustained Release of Vancomycin. ACS OMEGA 2024; 9:11701-11717. [PMID: 38496925 PMCID: PMC10938330 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c08113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
As the population ages, the number of vascular surgery procedures performed increases. Older adults often have multiple comorbidities, such as diabetes and hypertension, that increase the risk of complications from vascular surgery including vascular graft infection (VGI). VGI is a serious complication with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Here, we aimed to develop a nanofibrous chitosan-based coating for vascular grafts loaded with different concentrations of the vancomycin antibiotic vancomycin (VAN). Blending chitosan with poly(vinyl alcohol) or poly(ethylene oxide) copolymers improved solubility and ease of spinning. Thermal gravimetric analysis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed the presence of VAN in the nanofibrous membranes. Kinetics of VAN release from the nanofibrous mats were evaluated using high-performance liquid chromatography, showing a burst followed by sustained release over 24 h. To achieve longer sustained release, a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) coating was applied, resulting in extended release of up to 7 days. Biocompatibility assessment using human umbilical vein endothelial cells demonstrated successful attachment and viability of the nanofiber patches. Our study provides insights into the development of a drug delivery system for vascular grafts aimed at preventing infection during implantation, highlighting the potential of electrospinning as a promising technique in the field of vascular surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Serpelloni
- Center
for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston
Methodist Academic Institute, Houston, Texas 77030-2707, United States
- Department
of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering (DEIB), Politecnico di Milano, Milan 20133, Italy
- Department
of Orthopedics and Sport Medicine, Houston
Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030-2707, United States
| | - Michael Ellis Williams
- Center
for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston
Methodist Academic Institute, Houston, Texas 77030-2707, United States
- Reproductive
Biology and Gynaecological Oncology Group, Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8QA, U.K.
| | - Sergio Caserta
- Department
of Chemical Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80138, Italy
| | - Shashank Sharma
- Department
of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist
Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030-2707, United States
| | - Maham Rahimi
- Department
of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist
Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030-2707, United States
| | - Francesca Taraballi
- Center
for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston
Methodist Academic Institute, Houston, Texas 77030-2707, United States
- Department
of Orthopedics and Sport Medicine, Houston
Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030-2707, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mancino F, Yates PJ, Clark B, Jones CW. Use of topical vancomycin powder in total joint arthroplasty: Why the current literature is inconsistent? World J Orthop 2023; 14:589-597. [PMID: 37662663 PMCID: PMC10473911 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i8.589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but terrible complication in hip and knee arthroplasty, and the use of topical vancomycin powder (VP) has been investigated as a tool to potentially reduce its incidence. However, there remains no consensus on its efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an overview on the application of topical vancomycin in orthopaedic surgery focusing on the recent evidence and results in total joint arthroplasty. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses on topical VP in hip and knee arthroplasty have been recently published reporting sometimes conflicting results. Apart from all being limited by the quality of the included studies (mostly level III and IV), confounding variables are often included potentially leading to biased conclusions. If taken into consideration the exclusive use of VP in isolation, the available data, although very limited, suggest that it does not reduce the infection rate in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Therefore, we still cannot advise for a routinary application. A properly powered randomized-controlled trial would be necessary to clarify the role of VP in hip and knee arthroplasty. Based on the analysis of the current evidence, the use of topical VP appears to be safe when used locally in terms of systemic adverse reactions, hence, if proven to be effective, it could bring great benefits due to its low cost and accessibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Mancino
- Department of Orthopaedics, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth 6150, Australia
| | - Piers J Yates
- Department of Orthopaedics, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth 6150, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Orthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia, Perth 6010, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
| | - Benjamin Clark
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth 6150, Australia
| | - Christopher W Jones
- Department of Orthopaedics, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth 6150, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Orthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia, Perth 6010, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Mancino
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, London, UK
- Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
| | - Vanya Gant
- Department of Microbiology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dominic R M Meek
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Fares S Haddad
- Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Bone & Joint Journal , London, UK
| |
Collapse
|