Variability in the Patellar Attachment of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament

Reconstruction of the medical patellofemoral ligament through a double-bundle and suspension fixation of the adductor muscle tendon combined with semi-patellar ligament displacement for treating recurrent patellar dislocation in adolescents with unclosed epiphysis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament is the core of the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD). For adolescents with unclosed epiphysis, the surgical method is the key to the postoperative efficacy. And our study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and imaging results of double-bundle and suspension fixation of the adductor muscle tendon combined with semi-patellar ligament displacement in the treatment of RPD in adolescents with tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance > 15 mm and unclosed epiphysis.

METHODS

A total of 27 patients (13 males, 14 females, 27 knees) with recurrent patellar dislocation were included according to the relevant criteria. The patients were treated with double-bundle suspension fixation of the quadriceps femoris tendon and adductor muscle tendon combined with semi-patellar ligament displacement. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner score, Lysholm score and Kujala score were used to evaluate knee function before and after the operation. TT-TG, lateral patella displacement (LPD) and patellar tilt angle (PTA) were measured by CT scan to evaluate patellar stability.

RESULTS

All 27 patients were followed up for 30-45 months (mean 36.44 ± 4.34 months). At the last follow-up, the IKDC score, Tegner score, Lysholm score and Kujala score of the 27 patients were 89.00 ± 2.76, 3.89 ± 0.64,92.56 ± 2.03 and 91.07 ± 2.37, respectively. Compared with preoperative, the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). At the last follow-up, the TT-TG distance, LPD and PTA of 27 patients were 11.25 ± 0.89, 6.25 ± 0.57 mm and 9.89 ± 0.95°, respectively; compared with preoperative, the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). No related complications occurred in 27 patients.

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of the medical patellofemoral ligament through a double-bundle and suspension fixation of the adductor muscle tendon combined with semi-patellar ligament displacement for treating recurrent patella dislocation in adolescents with unclosed epiphysis reached a satisfactory mid-term efficacy, the long-term efficacy still needs to be further explored.

All-Soft-Tissue Medial Patellofemoral Complex Reconstruction for Revisions and Skeletally Immature Knees

The medial patellofemoral complex provides the primary static restraint to lateral patellar translation and is composed of the medial patellofemoral ligament and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament. Multiple techniques including medial patellofemoral ligament and/or medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament reconstruction have demonstrated good results; however, modification of the femoral fixation technique is required for skeletally immature patients or revision cases in which anatomic bony fixation on the femur is not possible. This technique describes an all-soft-tissue procedure for single-bundle medial patellofemoral complex reconstruction in which the graft is fixed on the adductor tendon while using the medial collateral ligament as a distalizing pulley, for anatomic and isometric recreation of the native ligament.

Adductor Tubercle Appears More Posterior on Radiographs of Knees With Trochlear Dysplasia

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic positions of commonly utilized landmarks for medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) reconstruction between symptomatic and normal knees and to assess the influence of morphologic risk factors.

METHODS

Three-dimensional models were created from the knees of patients with patellar instability and compared to control knees. On 3-dimensional models, the adductor tubercle, medial epicondyle, and gastrocnemius tubercle were marked. A 2-dimensional view was created from these models to simulate radiographs, and the radiographic location of each landmark was described with respect to the antero-posterior relation to the posterior cortical line and the proximal-distal relationship to the posterior condylar line. The position of each landmark was compared between symptomatic and control groups and assessed for variations in position with the severity of anatomic risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included in this study. On the 2-dimensional views, the medial epicondyle was found to be more posterior and more proximal than in the control group. The association between the severity of trochlear dysplasia and the posterior position of the adductor tubercle trended toward significance (R = 0.43, R2 = 0.18, P = .058). In symptomatic knees with trochlear dysplasia, the radiographic landmark for the medial epicondyle was posterior by 3.3 mm (P = .052), adductor tubercle by 2.7 mm (P = .009), and gastrocnemius tubercle by 3.9 mm (P = .010) when compared to symptomatic knees without dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that commonly utilized anatomic landmarks on the medial femur are more posterior on radiographs in knees with patellar instability when compared to normal knees. Trochlear dysplasia is associated with the radiographic landmarks of the adductor and gastrocnemius tubercles appearing 3mm posterior to those without dysplasia, and its severity is associated with increased posterior radiographic appearance of the adductor tubercle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective Case Control.

Implications for Femoral Tunnel Placement in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Considering the Sagittal Trochlear Groove Curvature in Severe Trochlear Dysplasia Before and After Deepening Trochleoplasty

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) aims to restore proper ligament function with minimal changes in length during range of motion, yet the ideal area for femoral fixation of the graft remains controversial.

PURPOSE

To determine the region where the isometric circular path of a simulated MPFL graft (best-fit circle) follows the sagittal radius curvature of the trochlea in normal (nontrochlear dysplastic) knees and to evaluate the best-fit circle coverage of different femoral fixation points in knees with severe trochlear dysplasia (TD) and after deepening trochleoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve patients (4 male, 8 female; mean age, 24 ± 8 years) who underwent surgical treatment for recurrent lateral patellar instability due to severe TD were prospectively enrolled in this study. Four previously defined reference points for the femoral MPFL-R (Schöttle, Fujino, Stephen, and Oka) were identified, and the best-fit circle was drawn along the sagittal trochlear groove curvature. The divergence between each best-fit circle and the trochlear groove was calculated, with negative values indicating relative slackening and positive values indicating relative tightening of the simulated MPFL graft. Measurements were made on true-lateral fluoroscopic images before and after deepening trochleoplasty and compared with those of a sex-matched control group.

RESULTS

The best-fit circle of the Schöttle point followed the sagittal curvature of the trochlea most closely in both the control and trochlear dysplastic knees, followed by the Fujino, Stephen, and Oka points. As the radius of the trochlear groove curvature increased, the divergence of all best-fit circles to the trochlear groove became negative (all P < .05). This effect was most pronounced at the Stephen and Oka points, followed by the Fujino and Schöttle points (all P < .05). After deepening trochleoplasty, the divergence of the Schöttle point changed toward positive values (11.6% at 40°; P < .001). Concurrently, the best-fit circle divergence of all other reference points improved toward baseline (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The isometric circle of the Schöttle point provides the best congruence with the sagittal trochlear groove curvature in both the normal trochlea and the dysplastic trochlea. After trochleoplasty, the best-fit circles of more distal femoral fixation points resulted in better congruence with the deepened trochlear groove, whereas the best-fit circle of Schöttle indicated graft tension during flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

According to the present study, different femoral fixation points should be considered depending on whether the TD is corrected.

Patellofemoral Disorders in Soccer Players

Patellofemoral disorders are common in the world of soccer and impact players across all levels and ages of the sport. Patellofemoral disorders encompass a spectrum of conditions, from anterior knee pain to patellar instability, and are often influenced by complex biomechanical factors and anatomic variations that can predispose to these conditions. In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on injury prevention strategies and data-driven approaches, championed by organizations like the Union of European Football Associations and individual professional clubs. Conservative management remains the initial approach for many players, including physical therapy and supportive devices. However, surgical intervention, particularly in cases of recurrent patellar dislocations, is often necessary. The understanding of patellofemoral biomechanics in soccer continues to evolve and offers opportunities for more effective injury prevention and tailored treatment strategies. Despite the challenges, a comprehensive approach to patellofemoral disorders in soccer is essential to preserve player health, enhance performance, and sustain the sport's vitality.

Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament Reconstruction for Anatomic Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex

The medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) refers to the primary static restraint to lateral patellar translation. Originally thought of as the medial patellofemoral ligament, anatomic studies over the past 10 years have identified the additional fibers that attach to the quadriceps tendon, which some have termed the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament. Anatomic studies have demonstrated that the MPFC midpoint is at the junction of the medial border of the quadriceps tendon and the articular surface of the patella, indicating that fixation can be on either structure. This technique describes a single-bundle reconstruction technique with anatomic fixation on the quadriceps tendon at the MPFC midpoint that involves fixation on the extensor mechanism first.

Effect of Medial Patellofemoral Complex Reconstruction Technique on Patellofemoral Contact Pressure, Contact Area, and Kinematics

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is considered by many to be the gold standard to treat lateral patellar instability; however, some investigators have reported good clinical results after isolated medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) reconstruction or a combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction. A handful of studies have preliminarily investigated the biomechanical consequences of these various medial patellar stabilizing procedures. Despite this, no existing study has included multiple medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) reconstructions and assessment of lateral patellar translation at distinct flexion angles.

HYPOTHESIS

Combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction would restore patellofemoral contact areas, forces, and kinematics closest to the native state compared with isolated reconstruction of the MPFL or MQTFL alone.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten adult cadaveric knee specimens were prepared and analyzed under 5 different conditions: (1) intact state, (2) transected MPFC, (3) isolated MPFL reconstruction, (4) isolated MQTFL reconstruction, and (5) combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction. Patellar tilt, lateral patellar translation, patellofemoral contact forces, and patellofemoral contact areas were measured in each condition from 0° to 80° through simulated knee flexion using a custom servohydraulic load frame with pressure sensor technology and a motion capture system for kinematic data acquisition.

RESULTS

The isolated MPFL, isolated MQTFL, and combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction conditions produced significantly less lateral patellar tilt compared with the transected MPFC state (P < .05). No statistically significant differences were found when each reconstruction technique was compared with the intact state in patellar tilt, lateral patellar translation, contact forces, and contact areas.

CONCLUSION

All 3 reconstruction techniques (isolated MPFL reconstruction, isolated MQTFL reconstruction, and combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction) restored native knee kinematics, contact forces, and contact areas without overconstraint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Isolated MPFL reconstruction, isolated MQTFL reconstruction, and combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction all restore patellofemoral stability comparable with the intact MPFC state without the overconstraint that could be concerning for increasing risk of patellofemoral arthritis.

Radiographic Landmark Measurements for the Femoral Footprint of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex May Be Affected by Visible Femoral Shaft Length on Lateral Knee Radiographs

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of visible femoral shaft length on the accuracy of radiographic landmarks of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC).

METHODS

In 9 cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint was exposed on the medial femur, and its proximal and distal boundaries were marked. Lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were assessed in 1-cm length increments, beginning 1 cm proximal to the medial condyle and continuing proximally to 8 cm. The MPFC midpoint was described on each image relative to the posterior cortical line of the femur and a line perpendicular to this line through the proximal margin of the medial condyle. In addition, the MPFC midpoint was assessed relative to a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line.

RESULTS

Using the posterior cortical line as a reference, the MPFC radiographic landmark moved anteriorly with decreasing visible femoral shaft on radiographs, particularly at 4 cm and less. However, no proximal-distal change was noted. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a relationship between visible femoral shaft and MPFC position on radiographs (R = 0.461, R2 = 0.212, B = -0.636, P < .001). For every centimeter decrease in the visible femoral shaft, the radiographic MPFC footprint moved anteriorly by 0.636 mm. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a minimum of 4 cm of femoral shaft on lateral radiographs is required for accurate MPFC footprint localization (area under the curve = 0.80; sensitivity = 76.7%; specificity = 69.0%; P < .001). In contrast, no anterior-posterior change was seen when referencing a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line.

CONCLUSIONS

When using the posterior cortical line to identify the midpoint of the MPFC, at least 4 cm of femoral shaft should be visible for accurate assessment. If less than 4 cm of shaft is visible, a line through the midpoint of Blumensaat line and the proximal posterior cortex can be used as an alternative method to estimate the position of the femoral footprint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As fluoroscopy is frequently used intraoperatively for MPFC reconstruction, our findings may serve as a guide when assessing femoral tunnel placement on fluoroscopy.

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament through a double bundle of a single patellar tract and quadriceps tendons combined with medial displacement of lateral hemi-tibial tuberosity for treating low-grade recurrent patella dislocation

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and imaging results of reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament through a double bundle of single patellar tract and quadriceps tendons combined with medial displacement of lateral hemi-tibial tuberosity for treating low-grade recurrent patella dislocation.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with recurrent patellar dislocation, including ten males and 13 females, with 23 knee joints were enrolled according to the relevant criteria. Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament was performed through a double bundle of a single patellar tract and quadriceps tendons combined with medial displacement of lateral hemi-tibial tuberosity. Knee function was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner score, and Kujala score at pre- and postoperative stages. Patellar stability was assessed by CT scans measuring tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, lateral patella displacement (LPD), congruence angle (CA), and patellar tilt angle (PTA).

RESULTS

All 23 patients were effectively followed up for 13-28 months (mean: 21.91 ± 4.14 months). At the last follow-up, the postoperative VAS score, IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner score, and Kujala score of 23 patients were 1.13 ± 0.82, 87.35 ± 3.17, 90.22 ± 1.28, 4.35 ± 0.65, and 89.26 ± 1.96, respectively, as compared to the preoperative values of 5.91 ± 1.13, 30.96 ± 5.09, 30.30 ± 2.98, 1.26 ± 0.62, and 27.87 ± 3.46, respectively, and these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). At the last follow-up, the postoperative TT-TG, LPD, CA, and PTA values of the 23 patients were 8.80 ± 1.85 mm, 6.01 ± 1.77 mm, 11.32 ± 6.18°, and 9.35 ± 2.88°, respectively, compared to the preoperative values of 18.77 ± 1.74 mm, 14.90 ± 4.07 mm, 37.82 ± 5.71°, and 23.58 ± 3.24°, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). No relevant complications were observed in the 23 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament through a double bundle of a single patellar tract and quadriceps tendons combined with medial displacement of lateral hemi-tibial tuberosity for treating low-grade recurrent patella dislocation showed satisfactory medium-term efficacy, and further investigations are required to confirm the long-term efficacy of this approach.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Pedicled Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Yields Similar Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes but Less Donor-Site Morbidity Compared With Gracilis Tendon Autograft

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using either a gracilis tendon (GT) or quadriceps tendon autograft (QT).

METHODS

All MPFL reconstruction performed between 2017 and 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Only patients with isolated MPFL reconstruction, without any major patellofemoral risk factors and a minimum follow-up of 24 months, were included in the study. Patients were matched with respect to sex, age, and body mass index. All patients were evaluated clinically and using PROMs.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients with an average follow up of 28.7 ± 7.5 months were included in this study. The mean Kujala score (GT: 84.8 ± 12.9, QT: 88.9 ± 10.1), Lysholm score (GT: 89.4 ± 10.2, QT: 88.4 ± 5.0), and visual analog scale score for pain (GT: 1.9 ± 1.8, QT: 1.1 ± 1.3) did not significantly differ between both groups. Tegner activity level was significantly greater (P = .027) in the QT group (5.5 ± 1.9) compared with the GT group (4.6 ± 1.8), but within the minimal clinically important differences. Occasional patellar instability events, but no recurrent dislocation, were reported in 12.5% in the GT group and 6.3% in the QT group (P = .39). Of all patients, 90.6% in the QT and 68.8% in the HT group exceeded the PASS for the Kujala score (P = .06). Significantly more patients (59.4%) treated with GT reported donor-site morbidity in the form of sensitivity deficit at the lower leg compared with those treated with QT (3.1%, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

GT and QT MPFL reconstruction have comparable PROMs and patellar redislocation rates 2 years' postoperatively. Significantly more patients treated with GT reported lower-leg sensitivity deficit compared with those treated with QT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Clinical Insights into the Treatment of Patellofemoral Instability with Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Pearls and Pitfalls-Lessons Learned from 20 Years

Patellofemoral instability is a prevalent cause of pain and disability in young individuals engaged in athletic activities. Adolescents face a particularly notable risk of patellar dislocation, which can be attributed to rapid skeletal growth, changes in q-angle, ligamentous laxity, higher activity levels, and increased exposure to risk. Specific sports activities carry an elevated risk of patellar dislocation. Younger age and trochlear dysplasia present the highest risk factors for recurrent patellar dislocations. International guidelines recommend conservative therapy following a single patellar dislocation without osteochondral lesions but suggest surgical intervention in recurrent cases. In this study, we have compiled current scientific data on therapy recommendations, focusing on MPFL (medial patellofemoral ligament) reconstruction. We discuss patient selection, surgical indications, graft selection, location and choice of fixation, graft tensioning, and postoperative care.

Medial Patellofemoral Reconstruction Techniques for Patellar Instability

The medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) is the term used to describe the primary soft tissue stabilizer of the patella, which consists of fibers that attach to the patella (medial patellofemoral ligament, or MPFL), and the quadriceps tendon (medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament, or MQTFL). Despite the variability of its attachment on the extensor mechanism, the midpoint of this complex is consistently at the junction of the medial quadriceps tendon with the articular surface of the patella, indicating that either patellar or quadriceps tendon fixation can be used for anatomic reconstruction. Multiple techniques exist to reconstruct the MPFC, including graft fixation on the patella, quadriceps tendon, or both structures. Various techniques using several graft types and fixation devices have all reported good outcomes. Regardless of the location of fixation on the extensor mechanism, elements critical to the success of the procedure include anatomic femoral tunnel placement, avoiding placing undue tension on the graft, and addressing concurrent morphological risk factors when present. This infographic reviews the anatomy and techniques for the reconstruction of the MPFC, including graft configuration, type, and fixation, while addressing common pearls and pitfalls in the surgical treatment of patellar instability.

Lateral Patellar Instability

➤

Patellar instability represents a common problem with an evolving understanding and multifactorial pathoetiology. Treatment plans should be based on the identification of contributing anatomical factors and tailored to each individual patient.

➤

Risks for recurrent instability are dependent on several patient-specific factors including patella alta, increased tibial tubercle-to-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, trochlear dysplasia, younger skeletal age, and ligamentous laxity.

➤

Cartilage or osteochondral lesions and/or fractures are commonly observed in first-time patellar dislocation, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be strongly considered. Advanced imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) or MRI, should also be obtained preoperatively to identify predisposing factors and guide surgical treatment.

➤

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with anatomical femoral tunnel positioning is associated with lower recurrence rates compared with MPFL repair and has become a common and successful reconstructive surgical option in cases of instability.

➤

Lateral retinacular tightness can be addressed with lateral retinacular release or lengthening, but these procedures should not be performed in isolation.

➤

Tibial tubercle osteotomy is a powerful reconstructive tool in the setting of underlying skeletal risk factors for instability and can be of particular benefit in the presence of increased TT-TG distance (>20 mm), and/or in the setting of patella alta.

➤

The indications for trochleoplasty are still developing along with the clinical evidence, but trochleoplasty may be indicated in some cases of severe trochlear dysplasia. Several surgical techniques have indications in specific clinical scenarios and populations, and indications, risks, and benefits to each are progressing with our understanding.

➤

Combined femoral derotational osteotomy and MPFL reconstruction can be considered for patients with a femoral anteversion angle of >30° to improve patient outcomes and reduce recurrence rates.

Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Medial Patellofemoral Complex Reconstruction Techniques Shows Medial Overconstraint but No Significant Difference in Patella Lateralization and Contact Pressure

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate biomechanical differences of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) reconstruction, and a combination of these techniques to restore lateral patellar constraint and contact pressures.

METHODS

Eight fresh frozen cadaver knees were mounted to a custom jig with physiological quadriceps tendon loading. Flexion angles and contact pressure (CP) were dynamically measured using Tekscan® pressure sensors and Polhemus® Liberty 6 degree of freedom (6DOF) positioning sensors in the following conditions: 1) intact 2) MPFL and MQTFL deficient, 3) MPFL reconstructed, 4) Combined MPFL + MQTFL reconstructed, and 5) MQTFL reconstructed. Lateral patellar translation was tested using horizontally directed 30 N force applied at 30° of knee flexion. The knees were flexed in dynamic fashion, and CP values were recorded for 10°, 20°, 30°, 50°, 70°, and 90° degrees of flexion. Group differences were assessed with ANOVA's followed by pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

MPFL (P = .002) and combined MPFL/MQTFL (P = .034) reconstruction significantly reduced patellar lateralization from +19.28% (9.78%, 28.78%) in the deficient condition to -17.57% (-27.84%, -7.29%) and -15.56% (-33.61%, 2.30%), respectively. MPFL reconstruction was most restrictive and MQTFL reconstruction the least -7.29% (-22.01%, 7.45%). No significant differences were found between the three reconstruction techniques. Differences in CP between the three reconstruction techniques were not significant (<.02 MPa) at all flexion angles.

CONCLUSION

The present study found no significant difference for patellar lateralization and patellofemoral CP between MPFL, combined MPFL/MQTFL, and MQTFL reconstruction. All 3 techniques resulted in stronger lateral patellar constraint compared to the native state, while the MQTFL reconstruction emulated the intact state the closest.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Various surgical techniques for medial patellofemoral complex reconstruction can restore patellar stability with similar patellofemoral articular pressures.

Arthroscopic Anatomical Double-Bundle Medial Patellofemoral Complex Reconstruction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Treating Recurrent Patellar Dislocation Despite Trochlear Dysplasia, Elevated Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance, and Patellar Alta

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted double-bundle medial patellofemoral complex reconstruction (MPFC-R).

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out among adult patients who experienced at least 2 patellar dislocations and underwent primary arthroscopically assisted MPFC-R between January 2014 and November 2019. Dejour classification, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and patellar height (with Insall-Salvati index) were measured. Pre- and postoperative patellar tilt were compared. Information on outcome scores, ability to return to sports, postoperative recurrent dislocations, and complications was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 42 MPFC-Rs in 39 patients were included. Mean age at surgery was 22.2 ± 7.6 years; 69.2% of patients were female. Mean follow-up was 47.3 ± 20.2 months. Seventy-four percent of cases had Dejour B (19.0%), C (33.3%), and D (21.4%) trochlear dysplasia; mean TT-TG distance was 19.6 ± 3.5 mm, and mean Insall-Salvati index was 1.21 ± 0.17. Mean patellar tilt decreased from 27.6 ± 11.6° to 9.4 ± 6.5° (P < .001). All patients had statistically significant (P < .001) improvement in mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (44.9 ± 18.2 to 87.5 ± 6.9), Lysholm (61.4 ± 16.6 to 94.1 ± 6.4), Kujala (56.0 ± 16.8 to 92.9 ± 5.3), and Tegner score (2.7 ± 1.3 to 4.6 ± 1.4). The majority of patients (96.9%) returned to sports, with 90.3% returning to the same or greater level of activity. No postoperative dislocations or subluxations were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopically assisted double-bundle MPFC-R is a promising procedure to treat recurrent patellar instability at 2- to 7-year mid-term follow-up, despite the presence of trochlear dysplasia, elevated TT-TG distance and patellar alta. The improvement of IKDC score exceeded the minimal clinically important difference in 95.2% patients, and 66.7% surpassed the patient acceptable symptomatic state based on postoperative IKDC score with no redislocations being reported at latest follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series, retrospective.

Editorial Commentary: The Medial Patellofemoral Complex Is Composed of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and the Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament: Do We Need to Reconstruct Both?

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been known as the primary soft-tissue restraint to lateral patellar translation. More recent anatomic studies have identified additional fibers that extend to the quadriceps tendon (medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament [MQTFL]), leading to the use of the term "medial patellofemoral complex" (MPFC) to describe the broad and variable attachment of this complex on the patella and quadriceps tendon. Whereas many techniques and outcomes of traditional MPFL reconstruction have been described, fewer reports exist on anatomic MPFC reconstruction to recreate both bundles of this complex. To date, the specific biomechanical roles of, and indications for, reconstruction of the MPFL versus MQTFL fibers have not been defined. One primary benefit of MQTFL reconstruction has been to avoid the risk of patella fracture, which is not obviated in the setting of concurrent patellar fixation when reconstructing both components of the MPFC. The risks and benefits comparing fixation on the patella, quadriceps tendon, or both with anatomic double-bundle reconstruction remain to be determined. Additional studies are needed to understand the differences between reconstructing the proximal and distal fibers of the MPFC with regard to graft length changes and femoral attachment sites, in order to optimally recreate the function of each graft bundle in the surgical treatment of patellar instability.

Radiographic Landmarks for the Femoral Attachment of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

To report the radiographic landmarks for the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) footprint on the medial femur and describe the difference between the radiographic positions corresponding to the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) fibers.

METHODS

In 8 unpaired cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint was exposed on the medial femur, and the proximal and distal boundaries of the footprint were marked. Lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were obtained and analyzed using Image J. The proximal boundary corresponding to the MQTFL, the MPFC midpoint, and distal boundary corresponding to the MPFL were described radiographically and compared for differences in position.

RESULTS

The proximal MQTFL footprint was 0.8 ± 0.6 mm anterior (P = .013) and 5.2 ± 1.8 mm proximal to the MPFC midpoint (P <.001), whereas the distal MPFL footprint was 0.8 ± 0.7 mm posterior (P = .012) and 5.9 ± 1.1 mm distal to the radiographic MPFC midpoint (P <.001). The radiographic point corresponding to the distal MPFL footprint was 0.8 ± 0.9 mm posterior (P = .011) and 11.1 ± 2.3 mm distal to the radiographic point of the proximal MQTFL footprint (P <.001). When using the point of intersection of the posterior cortical line and the proximal posterior condyle as a reference, 91.6% of all points correlating to the MQTFL, MPFC midpoint and MPFL, were within 10 mm in any direction from this radiographic landmark.

CONCLUSIONS

On fluoroscopic imaging, the proximal MQTFL and distal MPFL fibers had significantly different radiographic positions from the MPFC midpoint on the femur. These findings should be considered when reconstructing specific components of the MPFC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As fluoroscopy is often used intraoperatively to guide graft placement, our findings may serve as a reference when differentiating the locations of the MPFL vs MQTFL on the femur for anatomic reconstruction.

Quantifying the Relationship Between the Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament and Patellar Borders: A Pediatric Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

The medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) is a structure composed of the medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) superiorly and the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) inferiorly. The pediatric MPFL anatomy has been well described, but the precise anatomy of the MQTFL has only recently been described and studied in skeletally immature patients.

PURPOSE

To describe the anatomic relationship between the MQTFL and its insertion on the quadriceps tendon and patella in pediatric specimens.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 22 pediatric cadaveric knee specimens were dissected to analyze attachment of the MQTFL to the quadriceps tendon and patella. Dissection was facilitated using lateral parapatellar arthrotomy followed by eversion of the extensor mechanism to evaluate MQTFL fibers from its undersurface.

RESULTS

The mean specimen age was 7.4 years. Specimens were divided based on age into a younger cohort (1-2 years), middle cohort (4-8 years), and older cohort (9-12 years). The quadriceps tendon attachment (QTA) of the MQTFL proximal to the patella extended a median of 5.0 mm in the younger cohort, 11.4 mm in the middle cohort, and 12.0 mm in the older cohort, with significant differences found between the younger and middle cohorts (P < .047) and the younger and older cohorts (P < .001). The QTA as a percentage of patellar articular height averaged 44.4% across all specimens. The vertical height of the patella measured a median of 14.0 mm, 22.3 mm, and 27.3 mm in the younger, middle, and older cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study expands on the recently described anatomy of the pediatric MPFC to quantify the anatomic relationship between the MQTFL attachment to the quadriceps tendon and patella in a more clinically relevant cohort of donor specimens.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As access to pediatric cadaveric tissue is extremely limited, a better understanding of MPFC and MQTFL anatomy will support surgeons in preoperative planning and intraoperative considerations for their approach to MQTFL and MPFL reconstruction. This may facilitate improved anatomic surgical stabilization of the patellofemoral joint in pediatric patients.

Simultaneous Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament Reconstructions Using an Artificial Ligament for Lateral Patella Instability

Recent studies on the detailed anatomy of the medial patellar stabilizer have revealed that the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) not only attaches to the patella but also has fibers that attach to the quadriceps muscle, known as the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL). Reconstruction of the medial stabilizer for patellar dislocation that includes both the MPFL and MQTFL may achieve better anatomical and physiological correction. In this Technical Note, we will describe a simultaneous reconstruction technique of the MPFL and MQTFL for patellar dislocation using an artificial ligament.

Arthroscopic Patellofemoral Measurements Can Reliably Assess Patellar Instability

PURPOSE

To arthroscopically describe patellar position based on lateralization, tilt, and engagement, and compare measurements in normal, medial patellofemoral complex-(MPFC) deficient, and MPFC-reconstructed knees.

METHODS

In 10 cadaveric knees, arthroscopic patellar position was assessed by performing digital measurements on arthroscopic images obtained through a standard anterolateral portal. Lateralization was measured as millimeters overhang of the patella past the lateral edge of the lateral femoral condyle, viewing from the lateral gutter. Patellar tilt was calculated as the difference in medial and lateral distances from the patella to the trochlea, viewing from the sunrise view. Patellotrochlear distance was measured as the anteroposterior distance between the central trochlear groove and patella on the sunrise view. Measurements were obtained at 10° intervals of knee flexion from 0° to 90°, in intact knees (group 1), after arthroscopically transecting the MPFC fibers (group 2), and after MPFC reconstruction (group 3). Optimal cutoff values were identified to distinguish between intact versus MPFC-deficient states.

RESULTS

When compared to group 1, group 2 demonstrated increased patellar lateralization by 22.5% at 0°-40° knee flexion (P = .006), which corrected to baseline in group 3 (P = .006). Patellar tilt measurements demonstrated no differences between groups. Patellotrochlear distance increased by 21.0% after MPFC transection (P = .031) at 0°-40° knee flexion, with correction to baseline after MPFC reconstruction (P = .031). More than 7 mm of lateral overhang at 20°-30° flexion and >6 mm of patellotrochlear distance at 10°-20° flexion were found to indicate MPFC deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing standardized arthroscopic views, we identified significant increases in patellar lateralization and patellotrochlear distance in early knee flexion angles after MPFC transection, and these changes normalized after MPFC reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Arthroscopic assessments of patellar position may be useful in evaluating patellofemoral stability during patellar stabilization surgery.

Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Medial Patellofemoral Complex Reconstruction

The medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) consists of the medial patellofemoral ligament and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament, which play a critical role stabilizing the patella against lateral translation. After a patellar dislocation, athletes with recurrent dislocations have functional limitations that may limit their return to their prior level of competition, requiring surgical reconstruction. Although ample literature exists delineating return-to-play (RTP) considerations after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there is a paucity of evidence specific to MPFC reconstruction. Athletes aiming to return to sport after MPFC reconstruction require the same methodical treatment approach to ensure safe RTP. A criterion-based periodical assessment of progress that measures range of motion, strength, neuromuscular control, balance, agility, and power are pivotal components of rehabilitating this population. A combination of objective and subjective criteria should be assessed when determining an individual’s readiness for sports-specific activities. A battery of functional tests, including quadriceps strength testing, single-limb hop testing, lateral step-down test, the lateral leap and catch test, the Y-balance test, and the depth jump should be considered when evaluating the athlete for readiness for sport, incorporating specific understanding of the biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint. We discuss the considerations for return-to-sport rehabilitation and testing after MPFC reconstruction, to provide clinicians working with an athletic population a framework to adequately prepare their athletes for safe return to sport.

Anatomic and Biomechanical Properties of Flat Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using an Adductor Magnus Tendon Graft: A Human Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

In contrast to the majority of existing techniques for reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), the technique described in this article uses the adductor magnus muscle tendon to gain a flat, broad graft, leaving its distal femoral insertion intact, and does not require drilling within or near the femoral physis. It also allows for soft tissue patellar fixation and could facilitate anatomic MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anatomic and structural properties of the native MPFL and the adductor tendon (AT), followed by biomechanical evaluation of the proposed reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

The morphological and topographical features of the AT and MPFL were evaluated in 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. The distance between the distal insertion of the AT on the adductor tubercle and the adductor hiatus, as well as the desired length of the graft, was measured to evaluate this graft's application potential. Load-to-failure tests were performed to determine the biomechanical properties of the proposed reconstruction construct. The construct was placed in a uniaxial testing machine and cyclically loaded 500 times between 5 and 50 N, followed by load to failure, to measure the maximum elongation, stiffness, and maximum load.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD length of the AT was 12.6 ± 1.5 cm, and the mean distance between the insertion on the adductor tubercle and adductor hiatus was 10.8 ± 1.3 cm, exceeding the mean desired length of the graft (7.5 ± 0.5 cm) by 3.3 ± 0.7 cm. The distal insertion of the AT was slightly proximal and posterior to the insertion of the MPFL. The maximum elongation after cyclical loading was 1.9 ± 0.4 mm. Ultimately, the mean stiffness and load to failure were 26.2 ± 7.6 N/mm and 169.7 ± 19.2 N, respectively. The AT graft failed at patellar fixation in 2 of the initially tested specimens and at the femoral insertion in the remaining 10.

CONCLUSION

The described reconstruction using the AT has potential for MPFL reconstruction. The AT graft presents a graft of significant volume, beneficial anatomic topography, and adequate tensile properties in comparison with the native MPFL following the data from previously published studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given its advantageous anatomic relationship as an application that avoids femoral drilling and osseous patellar fixation, the AT may be considered a graft for MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

Current Concepts Regarding Patellofemoral Trochlear Dysplasia

Optimal treatment of patients with patellofemoral trochlear dysplasia and recurrent patellar instability requires in-depth understanding of this complex structural anomaly. An extensive review of the literature suggests that dysplasia occurs as a result of aberrant forces applied to the patellofemoral joint in the majority of cases. Evidence supports surgical stabilization that reconstructs the medial patellofemoral and/or medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament without added trochleoplasty in the majority of patients with trochlear dysplasia and recurrent patellar instability. Adding tibial tubercle transfer distally, medially, or anteromedially in those who need it to treat specific deficits in alignment or articular cartilage can be beneficial in selected patients with trochlear dysplasia and recurrent patellar instability. Trochleoplasty may be appropriate in those few cases in which permanent stable patellofemoral tracking cannot be restored otherwise, but the indications are not yet clear, particularly as trochleoplasty adds risk to the articular cartilage. Improved understanding of imaging techniques and 3-dimensional reproductions of dysplastic patellofemoral joints are useful in surgical planning for patients with recurrent patellar instability and trochlear dysplasia.

The quadriceps insertion of the medial patellofemoral complex demonstrates the greatest anisometry through flexion

PURPOSE

A comprehensive understanding of the biomechanical properties of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) is necessary when performing an MPFC reconstruction. How components of the MPFC change over the course of flexion can influence the surgeon's choice of location for graft fixation along the extensor mechanism. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine native MPFC length changes throughout a 90° arc using an anatomically based attachment and using Schöttle's point, and (2) compare native MPFC length changes with different MPFC attachment sites along the extensor mechanism.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen (n = 8), cadaveric knees were dissected of all soft tissue structures except the MPFC. The distance between the femoral footprint (identified through anatomical landmarks and Schottle's point) and the MPFC was calculated at four attachment sites along the extensor mechanism [midpoint of the patella [MP], the center of the osseous footprint of the MPFC (FC), the superomedial corner of the patella at the quadriceps insertion (SM), and the proximal extent of the MPFC along the quadriceps tendon (QT)] at 0°, 20°, 40°, 60°, and 90° of flexion.

RESULTS

Length changes were investigated between the MPFL femoral attachment site and the radiographic surrogate of the MPFL attachment site, Schottle's Point (SP). Paired t tests at each of the four components showed no differences in length change from 0° to 90° when comparing SP to the anatomic MPFC insertion. MPFL length changes from 0° to 90° were greatest at the QT point (13.9 ± 3.0 mm) and smallest at the MP point (2.7 ± 4.4 mm). The FC and SM points had a length change of 6.6 ± 4.2 and 9.0 ± 3.8, respectively. Finally, when examining how the length of the MPFC components changed through flexion, the greatest differences were seen at QT where all comparisons were significant (p < 0.01) except when comparing 0° vs 20° (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The MPFC demonstrates the most significant length changes between 0° and 20° of flexion, while more isometric behavior was seen during 20°-90°. The attachment points along the extensor mechanism demonstrate different length behaviors, where the more proximal components of the MPFC display greater anisometry through the arc of motion. When performing a proximal MPFC reconstruction, surgeons should expect increased length changes compared to reconstructions utilizing distal attachment sites.

[Research progress in femoral tunnel positioning points of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction]

Objective

To review the research progress of location methods and the best femoral insertion position of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction of femoral tunnel, and provide reference for surgical treatment.

Methods

The literature about femoral insertion position of the MPFL reconstruction in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of MPFL, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of femoral tunnel positioning methods were summarized.

Results

The accurate establishment of the femoral anatomical tunnel is crucial to the success of MPFL reconstruction. At present, there are mainly two kinds of methods for femoral insertion: radiographic landmark positioning method and anatomical landmark positioning method. Radiographic landmark positioning method has such advantages as small incision and simple operation, but it can not be accurately positioned for patients with severe femoral trochlear dysplasia. It is suggested to combine with the anatomical landmark positioning method. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no unified positioning standard. In recent years, the use of three-dimensional design software can accurately assist in the MPFL reconstruction, which has become a new trend.

Conclusion

Femoral tunnel positioning of the MPFL reconstruction is very important. The current positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Personalized positioning is a new trend and has not been widely used in clinic, its effectiveness needs further research and clinical practice and verification.

Anatomical Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patella Dislocation: Two-Strand Grafts versus Four-Strand Grafts

The purpose of this study was to describe two anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction methods: reconstruction with two-strand grafts and reconstruction with four-strand grafts and to evaluate the clinical and radiological results. From January 2010 to January 2013, patients who sustained recurrent patella dislocation and met inclusion criteria were included in the study and divided into two groups randomly to undergo MPFL reconstruction either by two-strand grafts (T group) or four-strand grafts (F group). Patients were followed up 1 month, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years postoperatively. The apprehension test was applied to test patella stability. The Kujala score, Lysholm score, and Crosby-Insall grading were used to evaluate the function of the affected knee. The patellar congruence and patellar tilt angle were used to measure the morphology of the patellofemoral joint. In addition, patients' subjective assessments and complications were recorded. Thirty-eight patients in T group and 38 patients in F group were followed for at least 36 months. The apprehension test was positive in all patients preoperatively but was negative at follow-up. The Kujala score, Lysholm score, patellar congruence angle, and the patellar tilt angle of patients in both groups improved significantly at 36-month follow-up when compared with those assessed preoperatively. However, patients in the F group achieved better clinical results in terms of Kujala score, patellar congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, and Crosby-Insall grading when compared with those in the T group 3 years after the operation. Most patients (92% of patients in the T group and 97% of patients in the F group) were satisfied with the surgery. The anatomical MPFL reconstruction with two-strand grafts or four-strand grafts were both safe techniques for recurrent patella dislocation with satisfactory clinical outcomes. The anatomical fixation with four-strand grafts achieved better clinical and radiographic results in the follow-up, which may be a better reconstruction method.

Femoral Origin Anatomy of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex: Implications for Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To report the shape and orientation of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) footprint on the medial femur and describe the difference between the proximal (medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament, MQTFL) and distal (medial patellofemoral ligament, MPFL) fibers.

METHODS

In 20 cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint on the medial femur was exposed. Images of the medial femur were analyzed using ImageJ software. The length and width of the MPFC footprint were described to the nearest 0.1 mm; the angle of its long axis was described relative to the axis of the femoral shaft (0.1°). The footprint's most proximal and distal margins were described in relation to the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle. The differences between each were compared using paired t tests.

RESULTS

17 knees from 10 cadavers were included in this study. The MPFC footprint had a length of 11.7 ± 1.8 mm and a width of 1.7 ± 0.4 mm. The long axis of the footprint was at an angle 14.6° ± 16.6° anterior to the axis of the femoral shaft. The most proximal (MQTFL) fibers originated 7.4 ± 3.8 mm anterior and 1.8 ± 4.7 mm distal to the adductor tubercle and 4.1 ± 2.9 mm posterior and 8.4 ± 5.6 mm proximal to the medial epicondyle. The most distal (MPFL) fibers originated 4.9 ± 4.2 mm anterior and 12.7 ± 4.3 mm distal to the adductor tubercle, as well as 7.1 ± 2.4 mm posterior and 0.5 ± 5.6 mm distal to the medial epicondyle. The distal margin of the femoral MPFC footprint was 10.9 ± 1.7 mm distal (p < .001) and 2.6 ± 3.2 mm more posterior (p = .005) than the proximal margin.

CONCLUSIONS

The femoral footprint of the MPFC has a length almost 7 times greater than its width, with the distal margin being 10.9 mm distal and 2.6 mm posterior to the proximal margin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This differential anatomy within the femoral origin suggests that MPFL and MQTFL reconstruction may require separate positions of femoral fixation to recreate the anatomy of these fibers.

Differential Contributions of the Quadriceps and Patellar Attachments of the Proximal Medial Patellar Restraints to Resisting Lateral Patellar Translation

PURPOSE

To define the contributions of the of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) to lateral patellar translation as the knee moves through a 90° arc of motion.

METHODS

Six pairs of bilateral cadaveric knee specimens (12 knees) were dissected and potted in perfect lateral position using fluoroscopy. An eye screw was placed in the midpoint on the lateral aspect of the patella. Each knee underwent testing in 4 conditions after sequential sectioning: intact, lateral retinacular release, randomized MQTFL or MPFL sectioning, and complete proximal medial patellar restraint (PMPR) sectioning. With a custom machined jig, all knees were tested at 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 90° of flexion on an MTS machine with 20N of lateral patellar force applied and displacement recorded.

RESULTS

PMPR extensor mechanism insertion on all specimens was identified 50% on the quadriceps tendon and 50% on the proximal aspect of the medial patella. Isolated MPFL sectioning resulted in significantly increased lateral displacement compared to the lateral release state at all flexion angles tested except 0°. There was significantly increased lateral patellar displacement with complete sectioning compared with isolated proximal sectioning at all degrees of knee flexion except 0°. However, complete sectioning following isolated MPFL sectioning did not demonstrate significance at any angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the MQTFL, the MPFL is primarily responsible for resistance to lateral patellar translation throughout a 0° to 90° arc of motion. The MPFL provides a similar resistance to lateral patellar displacement as the fully intact PMPR; however, the MQTFL may contribute to resistance in full extension.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Proximal medial patellar restraint reconstruction techniques involving both the patellar and quadriceps insertion have been described; however, the unique contributions of the native anatomy to lateral patellar restraint have not been investigated.

The Ribbon-shaped Femoral Footprint of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: Implications for Reconstruction

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary static stabilizer to lateral translation of the patella and serves as part of the medial patellar soft tissue restraints. Because of the sensitivity of MPFL graft function after reconstruction to the position of the femoral tunnel, many studies have aimed to identify the exact point of the femoral origin, as well as defining techniques to confirm this position intraoperatively. We describe the ribbon-shaped footprint of the MPFL on the medial femur and the associated difficulty in identifying the origin as a single "point." Varying isometry and biomechanical functions have been shown to exist within the most proximal and most distal fibers, suggesting the function of the MPFL may not be fully recreated with a tubular graft in a round tunnel. We review the anatomical descriptions of the elongated femoral footprint of the MPFL and describe our surgical technique to recreate this.

An Updated Overview of the Anatomy and Function of the Proximal Medial Patellar Restraints (Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and the Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament)

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been widely accepted to function as "the primary static restraint to lateral patellar displacement." However, current growing evidence suggests that there is a complex of medial patellofemoral/tibial ligaments, both proximal [MPFL, and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL)], and distal (medial patellotibial ligament and the medial patellomeniscal ligament) which restrain lateral patellar translation at different degrees of knee flexion. Specifically, the MQTFL has gained popularity over the last decade because of pure soft tissue attachments into the extensor mechanism that allow for avoidance of drilling tunnels into the patella during reconstruction. The purpose of this article was to report on the current knowledge (anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, indications for surgery, and techniques) on the proximal medial patellar restraints, namely the MPFL and the MQTFL, collectively referred to as the proximal medial patellar restraints.

Recognition of evolving medial patellofemoral anatomy provides insight for reconstruction

PURPOSE

The scientific literature concerning the anatomy of medial soft-tissue stabilizers of the patella is growing exponentially. Much of the surgical literature has focused on the role of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and techniques to reconstruct it, yet our understanding of its anatomy has evolved during the past several years. Given this, we report on the current understanding of medial patellofemoral anatomy and implications for reconstruction.

METHODS

Current and historical studies of medial patellar anatomy were reviewed, which include the MPFL and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL), as well as that of the distal medial patellar restraints, the medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML). In addition to the reported findings, the authors' anatomic descriptions of each ligament during their dissections were identified and recorded.

RESULTS

Despite the name of the MPFL, which implies that the ligament courses between the femur and patella, recent studies have highlighted the proximal MPFL fibers that attach to the quadriceps tendon, known as the MQTFL. The MPFL and MQTFL have also been referred to as the medial patellofemoral complex, reflecting the variability in anatomical attachment sites. The MPFL accounts for only half of the total restraint to lateral patellar displacement, and the remaining contributions to patellar stability are derived from the combination of the MPTL and MPML, which function primarily in greater degrees of knee flexion.

CONCLUSION

The understanding of the complexity of the medial patellar stabilizers continues to evolve. Although MPFL reconstruction is gaining wide acceptance as a procedure to treat patellar instability, it is important to recognize the complex and changing understanding of the anatomy of the medial soft-tissue stabilizers and the implications for reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

The Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Is a Dynamic and Anisometric Structure: An In Vivo Study on Length Changes and Isometry

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is associated with a high rate of complications, including recurrent instability and persistent knee pain. Technical errors are among the primary causes of these complications. Understanding the effect of adjusting patellofemoral attachments on length change patterns may help surgeons to optimize graft placement during MPFL reconstruction and to reduce graft failure rates.

PURPOSE

To determine the in vivo length changes of the MPFL during dynamic, weightbearing motion and to map the isometry of the 3-dimensional wrapping paths from various attachments on the medial femoral epicondyle to the patella.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy participants were studied with a combined computed tomography and biplane fluoroscopic imaging technique during a lunge motion (full extension to ~110° of flexion). On the medial femoral epicondyle, 185 attachments were projected, including the anatomic MPFL footprint, which was divided into 5 attachments (central, proximal, distal, posterior, and anterior). The patellar MPFL area was divided into 3 possible attachments (proximal, central, and distal). The length changes of the shortest 3-dimensional wrapping paths of the various patellofemoral combinations were subsequently measured and mapped.

RESULTS

For the 3 patellar attachments, the most isometric attachment, with an approximate 4% length change, was located posterior and proximal to the anatomic femoral MPFL attachment, close to the adductor tubercle. Attachments proximal and anterior to the isometric area resulted in increasing lengths with increasing knee flexion, whereas distal and posterior attachments caused decreasing lengths with increasing knee flexion. The anatomic MPFL was tightest in extension, decreased in length until approximately 30° of flexion, and then stayed near isometric for the remainder of the motion. Changing both the femoral and patellar attachments significantly affected the length changes of the anatomic MPFL ( P < .001 for both).

CONCLUSION

The most isometric location for MPFL reconstruction was posterior and proximal to the anatomic femoral MPFL attachment. The anatomic MPFL is a dynamic, anisometric structure that was tight in extension and early flexion and near isometric beyond 30° of flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Proximal and anterior MPFL tunnel positioning should be avoided, and the importance of anatomic MPFL reconstruction is underscored with the results found in this study.

Editorial Commentary: The "F" in MPFL (Medial Patellofemoral Ligament) Reconstruction-How Should We Fix It and Does It Matter?

Our understanding of the medial patellofemoral complex anatomy has evolved significantly over the past several decades, and this has informed our current surgical approach to management of lateral patellar instability. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction remains the gold standard for decreasing the risk of secondary patellar dislocation and returning patients to active physical function. However, concerns about isometry, overconstraint, secondary arthrosis, and surgical-site morbidity remain with femoral socket fixation, particularly when patella alta, rotational malalignment, or hypermobility is present. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with soft-tissue fixation, on either the patellar or femoral side, may mitigate some of these risks by offering a more dynamic checkrein to lateral translation. However, longer-term studies are required to determine comparative efficacy with varying surgical techniques, and the ideal graft tension and degree of knee flexion during fixation have not yet been determined.

Editorial Commentary: Medial Patellofemoral Complex: Driving a Better Understanding of Medial Knee Anatomy

Although its importance as the prime restraint to lateral patellar instability is undoubted, the anatomy of the medial patellofemoral ligament has never been agreed on. Since it was first described by Warren and Marshall in 1979, most of the anatomic studies confirmed its presence in 90% of the cases, but they usually provide inconsistent descriptions of its femoral and patellar attachments. It is proven that length changes in the reconstructed medial patellofemoral ligament depend principally on the femoral attachment site. Moreover, the femoral attachment site affects the patellar tilt, translation, and joint reaction force. Because of the early inconsistent descriptions of the medial patellofemoral ligament attachment sites, some authors have suggested that its anatomy is not fixed or may be patient specific.

Radiographic Landmarks for the Anterior Attachment of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex

PURPOSE

Because fluoroscopy is often used in graft placement during patellar stabilization surgery, the purpose of this study was to describe the radiographic landmarks for the anterior attachment midpoint of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC).

METHODS

Seventeen fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were dissected, and the MPFC was exposed from the articular side after a lateral parapatellar approach. The midpoint of the anterior attachment of the MPFC was identified using a ruler and marked with a pin. Lateral fluoroscopic images of the patella were then obtained and analyzed using digital analysis software. The distance from the superior articular pole to the pin was divided by the length of the articular surface to describe the location of the pin as a percentage of patellar articular length.

RESULTS

Of the 17 cadaveric knees, 2 were excluded because of lack of MPFC fibers. In the remaining 15 knees, the mean (±standard deviation) proximal-distal width of the attachment to the patella and/or vastus intermedius tendon was 41 ± 10 mm, spanning from 15 ± 6 mm proximal to the superior pole of the patella to 27 ± 8 mm distal to it. When viewed on lateral fluoroscopic images, the MPFC midpoint was 19% ± 14% of the patellar articular length from the superior articular pole.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the radiographic landmarks that correlate to the anatomic midpoint of the anterior MPFC attachment are 19% ± 14% of the articular surface from the superior pole of the patella.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Recent reports on medial patellofemoral ligament anatomy now include fibers that extend to the quadriceps tendon, summarized as the MPFC. With the inclusion of these fibers, the midpoint of the anterior MPFC attachment is more proximal than that of the medial patellofemoral ligament alone. Because fluoroscopy is often used intraoperatively to guide graft placement, this study correlates radiographic landmarks with anatomic findings of the MPFC midpoint on its attachment to the extensor mechanism.

Proximal medial patellar restraints and their surgical reconstruction

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been increasing as a surgical solution for treatment of recurrent lateral patellofemoral dislocation. Recent attention has been given to fibers extending from the femur to the quadriceps tendon, proximal to the MPFL, termed the medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament. This article briefly reviews the proximal medial patellar restraints and surgical procedures for their reconstruction.

A polygon-shaped complex appearance of medial patellofemoral ligament with dynamic functional insertion based on an outside-in and inside-out dissection technique

PURPOSE

To describe the unclarified characteristics of medial patellofemoral ligament and its relation to neighboring structures.

METHODS

Sixteen fresh-frozen human knees were dissected in using outside-in and inside-out combined technique. The patellar side attachment was observed from the inside view and femoral side from outside view.

RESULTS

The medial patellofemoral ligament was described a complex and multiconnected structure. The femoral side included the upper and lower portion, of which the upper portion attached on the femur with mean width 7.5 ± 1.1 mm and its superficial fibers extended to the adductor magnus tendon and the medial gastrocnemius tendon, and of which the lower portion appeared a right-triangle connected to the MCL without bony attachment. From inside view, the patellar attachment consisted of the bony and non-bony parts. The width of bony attachment was measured mean 16.3 ± 3.8 mm, and the non-bony attachment was found attached on the vastus intermedius tendon with mean width 21.7 ± 4.8 mm. The average thickness was 0.4 ± 0.1 mm and the length were inside assessed mean 67.9 ± 6.1 mm.

CONCLUSION

The medial patellofemoral ligament which dissected a complicated structure with bony and non-bony attachment and multi-connected to neighboring structures on both patella and femur side appears as a polygon-shaped complex structure.

Editorial Commentary: What Is the Optimal Management of First and Recurrent Patellar Instability? Patellofemoral Instability Management Continues to Evolve

Patellar instability patients may present for evaluation after their first instability episode or after recurrent episodes. Current management differs for these 2 groups. The accepted "common denominator" of patellar instability is the medial patellofemoral ligament, or medial patellar restraints, to be more all-encompassing. These patients often have multiple contributing comorbidities (e.g., trochlear dysplasia, patellar alta, excessive lateral position of tibial tubercle). Historically, the recommended treatment for a first-time patellar dislocation was nonoperative because medial soft tissue repairs had not been proven more effective. Indications for primary repair of the medial patellar restraints are a single discrete tear identified on magnetic resonance imaging. In the case of recurrent patellar instability, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, rather than repair/reef, has been the recommended approach. The keys to reconstruction remain: honor the anatomy and avoid overconstraint of the patella. For first time dislocation patients with trochlear dysplasia, patellar alta, and age <25 years, recurrent instability is common.

Surgical Management of Patellofemoral Instability in the Skeletally Immature Patient

Compared with skeletally mature patients, skeletally immature patients are at a higher risk of acute traumatic patellar dislocation. Surgical treatment is the standard of care for patients with recurrent instability and requires important and technically challenging physeal considerations. Physeal-sparing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is the treatment of choice for these patients, replacing older nonanatomic extensor mechanism realignment techniques. Implant-mediated guided growth is an important adjunct to correct genu valgum angular deformities that contribute to patellar instability. Patient-specific surgical techniques and proper surgical indications are crucial for successful outcomes.

[Influencing factors of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar dislocation]

Objective

To review the influencing factors of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for patellar dislocation.

Methods

The literature of MPFL reconstruction for patellar dislocation at home and abroad in recent years were summarized and analyzed.

Results

The influencing factors such as the location of the femoral insertion point, the tension and the fixed angle of the grafts, the dysplasia of the femoral trochlear before operation, the abnormal tuberositas tibiae-trochlear groove value, the high position of the patellar, and the tilting angle of the patellar, are all the factors affecting the effectiveness of MPLF reconstruction.

Conclusion

During MPFL reconstruction, the surgical techniques and elimination of other factors that caused patellar instability need to be focused in order to reduce the complications and operation failure.

The medial patellofemoral complex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe the current understanding of the medial patellofemoral complex, including recent anatomic advances, evaluation of indications for reconstruction with concomitant pathology, and surgical reconstruction techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advances in our understanding of MPFC anatomy have found that there are fibers that insert onto the deep quadriceps tendon as well as the patella, thus earning the name "medial patellofemoral complex" to allow for the variability in its anatomy. In MPFC reconstruction, anatomic origin and insertion points and appropriate graft length are critical to prevent overconstraint of the patellofemoral joint. The MPFC is a crucial soft tissue checkrein to lateral patellar translation, and its repair or reconstruction results in good restoration of patellofemoral stability. As our understanding of MPFC anatomy evolves, further studies are needed to apply its relevance in kinematics and surgical applications to its role in maintaining patellar stability.

The Anatomy of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex

The term "medial patellofemoral complex" (MPFC) was proposed to describe the static medial stabilizer of the patella, typically referred to as the medial patellofemoral ligament. In light of our increasing understanding of the attachment of its fibers to the quadriceps tendon in addition to the patella, the term MPFC is used in this article. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the anatomy of the MPFC.

Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of the Medial Patellar Ligaments: An Anatomic and Radiographic Study

BACKGROUND

The qualitative and quantitative anatomy of the medial patellar stabilizers has been reported; however, a quantitative analysis of the anatomic and radiographic attachments of all 4 ligaments relative to anatomic and osseous landmarks, as well as to one another, has yet to be performed.

PURPOSE

To perform a qualitative and quantitative anatomic and radiographic evaluation of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL), medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML), and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) attachment sites, with attention to their relationship to pertinent osseous and soft tissue landmarks.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten nonpaired fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were dissected, and the MPFL, MPTL, MPML, and MQTFL were identified. A coordinate measuring device quantified the attachment areas of each structure and its relationship to pertinent bony landmarks. Radiographic analysis was performed through ligament attachment sites and relevant anatomic structures to assess their locations relative to pertinent bony landmarks.

RESULTS

Four separate medial patellar ligaments were identified in all specimens. The center of the MPFL attachments was 14.3 mm proximal and 2.1 mm posterior to the medial epicondyle and 8.3 mm distal and 2.7 mm anterior to the adductor tubercle on the femur and 8.9 mm distal and 19.9 mm medial to the superior pole on the patella. The MQTFL had a mean insertion length of 29.3 mm on the medial aspect of the distal quadriceps tendon. The MPTL and MPML shared a common patellar insertion and were 9.1 mm proximal and 15.4 mm medial to the inferior pole. The MPTL attachment inserted on a newly identified bony ridge, which was located 5.0 mm distal to the joint line. The orientation angles of the MPTL and MPML with respect to the patellar tendon were 8.3° and 22.7°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The most important findings of this study were the correlative anatomy of 4 distinct medial patellar ligaments (MPFL, MPTL, MPML, MQTFL), as well as the identification of a bony ridge on the medial proximal tibia that consistently served as the attachment site for the MPTL. The quantitative and radiographic measurements, while comparable with current literature, detailed the meniscal insertion of the MPML and defined a patellar insertion of the MPTL and the MPML as a single attachment. The data allow for reproducible landmarks to be established from previously known bony and soft tissue structures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The findings of this study provide the anatomic foundation needed for an improved understanding of the role of medial-sided patellar restraints. This will help to further refine injury patterns and/or soft tissue deficiencies that result in lateral patellar instability, which can then be addressed with an anatomic-based reconstruction or repair technique and potentially lead to improved outcomes.

Medial Patella Femoral Ligament Reconstruction With Periosteal Tunnels and Suture Fixation

Lateral patellar dislocations can damage the medial patella femoral ligament. Nonoperative care is preferred but some tears may require a surgical intervention. Patella fractures are considered a risk factor after surgery. The technique described in this Technical Note avoids any bone tunnel drilling, which may eliminate the possibility of a patella fracture. The surgical procedure uses periosteal fibro-osseous tunnels to a double-limbed gracilis graft to reconstruct the upper and lower borders as conventionally used for medial patella femoral ligament reconstruction. Once the graft is tensioned, it is sutured to the periosteal fibro-osseous tunnel with 2 sutures on the medial side and at least 1 suture on the lateral side of each periosteal fibro-osseous sleeve. Each of the 2 periosteal fibro-osseous tunnels has 3 to 4 sutures securing the graft. After surgery, the patients complete 5 phases of rehabilitation to reduce swelling and to regain their strength and range of motion.