Intraoperative Workflow for All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of Preconditioning and Knot Tying

Evaluation of Failed ACL Reconstruction: An Updated Review

Failure rates among primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) range from 3.2% to 11.1%. Recently, there has been increased focus on surgical and anatomic considerations which predispose patients to failure, including excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS), unaddressed high-grade pivot shift, and improper tunnel placement. The purpose of this review was to provide a current summary and analysis of the literature regarding patient-related and technical factors surrounding revision ACLR, rehabilitation considerations, overall outcomes and return to sport (RTS) for patients who undergo revision ACLR. There is a convincingly higher re-tear and revision rate in patients who undergo ACLR with allograft than autograft, especially amongst the young, athletic population. Unrecognized Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PLC) injury is a common cause of ACLR failure and current literature suggests concurrent operative management of high-grade PLC injuries. Given the high rates of revision surgery in young active patients who return to pivoting sports, the authors recommend strong consideration of a combined ACLR + Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) or Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure in this population. Excessive PTS has been identified as an independent risk factor for ACL graft failure. Careful consideration of patient-specific factors such as age and activity level may influence the success of ACL reconstruction. Additional technical considerations including graft choice and fixation method, tunnel position, evaluation of concomitant posterolateral corner and high-grade pivot shift injuries, and the role of excessive posterior tibial slope may play a significant role in preventing failure.

All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Had Clinical Outcome Similar to the Transtibial Technique Except for Improved Side-to-Side Difference and Tegner Activity Scale: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes of the all-inside technique with the transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on available literature on this topic.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist, we conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Our comprehensive search encompassed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that compared the 2 techniques with a minimal 1-year follow-up. Two independent authors assessed RCTs using the risk of bias tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration and evaluated the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomized Comparative Trials. The subjective and objective outcomes, complications, and graft failure were obtained. R software was used to perform the analysis.

RESULTS

The present analysis enrolled 9 RCTs (n = 687) and 11 cohort studies (n = 910). After a minimal 1-year follow-up in RCTs, functional outcomes such as International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, Knee Society Score, and hop test were found to be similar between 2 techniques. The laxity outcomes, including the IKDC objective grade and pivot-shift test, were suggested to be comparable. There was a significant difference favoring the transtibial technique in terms of side-to-side difference (P = .04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.90). The pooled data from cohort studies indicated equivalent results in terms of IKDC subjective score, Lysholm score, side-to-side difference, IKDC objective grade, complications, and graft failure, with the exception of statistical difference in the Tegner activity scale (P = .03; 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that there is no difference in most outcome scores between the all-inside and transtibial techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. There are statistically significant differences in side-to-side difference and Tegner activity scale favoring the all-inside technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, meta-analysis of Level I to IV studies.

Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Devices for All-Inside ACL Reconstruction: A Time-Zero Full-Construct Model

Background

Little is known about the stability of adjustable-loop devices (ALDs) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose

To evaluate the stabilization behavior of 3 different types of ALDs for all-inside ACLR in a full-construct surgical technique-based manner.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

The femoral and tibial devices of Ultrabutton (Smith & Nephew), Infinity (Conmed), and TightRope II (Arthrex) were applied to quadrupled bovine tendon grafts (n = 8 each) with tibial-sided traction applied (350 N) for graft tensioning in a simulated fully extended knee. Knotless femoral graft fixation was based on either a suture-locking device (SLD; Ultrabutton), button-locking device (BLD; Infinity), or dual-locking device (DLD; TightRope II). All constructs were progressively loaded (50 N/500 cycles) from 50 to 300 N for 3000 cycles (0.75 Hz), including complete unloading situations and pull to failure (50 mm/min). Construct elongation, stiffness, and ultimate load were analyzed.

Results

BLD showed significantly greater initial elongation (-2.69 ± 0.15 mm) than DLD (-3.19 ± 0.21 mm; P < .001) but behaved similarly to SLD (-2.93 ± 0.23 mm). While DLD and SLD had the smallest initial elongation at the same significance level, they behaved opposite to each other with gradually increasing peak loading. At the end of testing, DLD had the lowest (-0.64 ± 0.32 mm) and SLD the highest (3.41 ± 1.01 mm) total elongation (P < .003 for both). SLD displayed significantly higher dynamic elongation (6.34 ± 0.23 mm) than BLD (3.21 ± 0.61 mm) and DLD (2.56 ± 0.31 mm) (P < .001 for both). The failure load of BLD (865.0 ± 183.8 N) was significantly lower (P < .026) compared with SLD and DLD (>1000 N). The predominant failure mode was suture rupture and tibial bone breakage with button subsidence (SLD, n = 4). No significant difference in stiffness between constructs was found.

Conclusion

While DLD successfully restricted critical construct elongation, BLD partially and SLD completely exceeded the clinical failure threshold (>3 mm) of plastic elongation with loop lengthening during increasing cyclic peak loading with complete unloading. Higher failure loads of SLD and DLD implants (>1000 N) were achieved at similar construct stiffness to BLD.

Clinical Relevance

A detailed biomechanical understanding of the stabilization potential is pertinent to the continued evolution of ALDs to improve clinical outcomes.

Independent Suture Augmentation With All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Reduces Peak Loads on Soft-Tissue Graft. A Biomechanical Full-Construct Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of suture augmentation (SA) of 7-mm and 9-mm diameter graft on load sharing, elongation, stiffness, and load to failure for all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in a biomechanical Study was funded by Arthrex ID: EMEA-16020. full-construct porcine model.

METHODS

Bovine tendon grafts, 7-mm and 9-mm diameter, with and without SA were tested using suspensory fixation (n = 8). The independent SA was looped over a femoral button and knotted on a tibial button. Preconditioned constructs were incrementally increased loaded (100N/1,000 cycles) from 100N to 400N for 4,000 cycles (0.75 Hz) with final pull to failure (50 mm/min). Isolated mechanical and optical measurements during construct loading of the SA allowed to quantify the load and elongation range during load sharing. Construct elongation, stiffness and ultimate strength were further assessed.

RESULTS

Load sharing in 7-mm grafts started earlier (200N) with a significant greater content than 9-mm grafts (300N) to transfer 31% (125N) and 20% (80N) of the final load (400N) over the SA. Peak load sharing with SA reduced total elongation for 7-mm (1.90 ± 0.27 mm vs 4.77 ± 1.08 mm, P < .001) and 9-mm grafts (1.50 ± 0.33 mm vs 3.57 ± 0.54 mm, P < .001) and adequately increased stiffness of 7-mm (113.4 ± 9.3 N/mm vs 195.9 ± 9.8 N/mm, P < .001) to the level of augmented 9-mm grafts (208.9 ± 13.7N/mm). Augmentation of 7-mm (835 ± 92N vs 1,435 ± 228N, P < .001) and 9-mm grafts (1,044 ± 49N vs 1,806 ± 157N, P < .001) significantly increased failure loads.

CONCLUSIONS

Load sharing with SA occurred earlier (200N vs 300N) in lower stiffness 7-mm grafts to carry 31% (7-mm) and 20% (9-mm) of the final load (400N). Loads until peak load sharing were transferred over the graft. Augmented constructs showed significantly lower construct elongation and increased stiffness without significance between variable grafts. Failure load of augmented grafts were significantly increased.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Suture tape ligament augmentation may potentially protect biological grafts from excessive peak loading and elongation, thus reducing the risk of graft tears.

Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

Background

Transportal (TP) and all-inside techniques (AIT) are the most commonly used anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedures in current clinical practice. However, there is an ongoing debate over which procedure is superior. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes and complications of these two techniques to propose recommendations for future application. Our primary hypothesis was that AIT is a superior ACLR technique compared to TP.

Methods

A systematic literature review, using PRISMA guidelines, was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and EMBASE, up to February 2021 to identify studies focusing on AIT and TP techniques of ACL reconstruction. We excluded animal experiments, cadaveric studies, retrospective studies, case reports, technical notes, and studies without quantitative data. Patients’ characteristics, surgical technical features, along with postoperative follow-up and complications were extracted and reported accordingly. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS).

Results

A total of 44 studies were selected for this review, of which four were comparative studies. A total of 923 patients underwent AIT and 1678 patients underwent the TP technique for ACLR. A single semitendinosus graft was commonly used in the AIT compard to combined semitendinosus and gracilis graft in the TP group. The postoperative increase in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, KT-1000, and Short Form-12 (physical and mental) scores were similar in the AIT group and the TP group. Contrastingly, the VAS pain score was significantly lower in the AIT group compared to the TP group. Furthermore, the pooled complication rates from all studies were similar between the two groups (AIT: 54 patients, 8.26% vs. PT: 55 patients, 6.62%). However, the four studies that prospectively compared AIT and TP techniques showed lesser complications in the AIT group than the TP group.

Conclusion

Since the future trend in orthopedic surgery is toward less invasive and patients’ satisfaction with good outcomes, AIT is a good alternative method considering preserving bony tissue and gracilis tendon with less post-operative pain, along with more knee flexor strength and equal outcomes compared to conventional ACL reconstruction surgery.

Level of Evidence II.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02872-x.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With the All-Inside Technique: Equivalent Outcomes and Failure Rate at Three-Year Follow-Up Compared to a Doubled Semitendinosus-Gracilis Graft

Purpose: To compare in terms of failure rates, clinical and functional outcomes the all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with double suspensory fixation and quadrupled semitendinosus autograft with anteromedial portal doubled semitendinosus-gracilis autograft with suspensory femoral and tibial interference screw fixation.

Methods: Forty-four patients were sequentially allocated into two groups and followed up prospectively for a 3-year period. The first group was the all-inside group and the second was the “classic” AM portal with S-G graft. Each group comprised 22 patients. All patients underwent KT-1000 testing preoperatively and at a minimum of six months postoperatively. Visual pain analog was recorded preoperatively and during both the immediate postoperative period and throughout the follow-up. The Lysholm knee score was used comparing the preoperative and 24-month timepoints.

Results: The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores showed a significant difference at two weeks (2.4 vs 1.8, p < 0.01 ) in favor of the all-inside group, but that difference disappeared in the later follow-up visits. Similarly, there was no significant difference with Lysholm knee scores at two years and the side-to-side anterior translation measured with the KT-1000. At the three-year mark, there were no failures in either of the groups.

Conclusion: The all-inside technique appears to be equivalent in terms of outcomes to the classic S-G technique, and given the less-invasive nature and versatility in graft choices is a safe and effective technique for primary ACL reconstruction.

Clinical outcomes of Tightrope system in the treatment of purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries

Background

Purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries are mainly caused by low energy damage and often require surgical treatment. There are several operative techniques for rigid fixation to solve this problem clinically. This study evaluated the effect of using the Tightrope system to reconstruct the Lisfranc ligament for elastic fixation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 11 cases with purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries treated with the Tightrope system from 2016 to 2019, including 8 male and 3 female. X-ray was performed regularly after operation to measure the distance between the first and second metatarsal joint and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate pain relief. American orthopedic foot & ankle society (AOFAS) and Maryland foot score were recorded at the last follow-up.

Results

The average follow-up time was 20.5 months (range, 17–24). There was statistically significant difference in the distance between the first and second metatarsal joint and VAS score at 3 months, 6 months, and the last follow-up when compared with preoperative values (P < 0.05).Mean of postoperative AOFAS mid-foot scale and Maryland foot score were 92.4 ± 4.3, 94.1 ± 3.5, respectively. The Tightrope system was not removed and the foot obtained better biomechanical stability. No complications occurred during the operation.

Conclusion

Tightrope system in the treatment of purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries can stabilize the tarsometatarsal joint and achieve satisfactory effect.

Comparison Between Early and Late Retensioning of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device During Hamstring ACL Reconstruction

Background:

Biomechanical studies have demonstrated significant loosening of the adjustable-loop device as compared with the fixed-loop device used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Retensioning of the adjustable loop has been recommended; however, the timing of the retensioning is unknown.

Hypothesis:

Early (ER) and late retensioning (LR) will show similar gapping between the femoral tunnel and graft on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and similar clinical outcomes.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This study included 101 patients who underwent hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the adjustable-loop device for femoral fixation between June 2016 and January 2018. All patients a had follow-up MRI on postoperative day 1. Patients with revision surgery and those with reinjury after reconstruction were excluded. In the ER group, retensioning and knot tying of the initially tightened adjustable loop were performed after the flip of the button and before the graft was fixed at the tibia. In the LR group, retensioning and knot tying were performed after initial tightening of the adjustable loop and graft fixation at the tibial side. The tunnel-graft gap measured on multiplanar reformatted images of MRI scans was compared between the groups, as were clinical outcomes.

Results:

The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 30.3 years (range, 14-61 years). ER and knot tying were performed in 56 patients and LR and knot tying in 45. Preoperative characteristics of the 2 groups showed no significant differences. The mean ± SD tunnel-graft gap was 1.5 ± 2.0 mm in the ER group and 5.4 ± 4.0 mm in the LR group (P < .001). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the groups.

Conclusion:

ER and knot tying demonstrated less tunnel-graft gap than that of LR. However, there were no differences in clinical outcomes according to the timing of retensioning.

Flexion deformity and laxity as a function of knee position at the time of tensioning of rigid anatomic hamstring ACL grafts

Background

Anatomic ACL grafts routinely display the anisometric length-tension behaviour seen in the native ligament with maximum length in full knee extension. Recent improvements in hamstring graft preparation and fixation have improved graft rigidity to the point where total graft lengthening after implantation may be less than 1 mm. Despite this it remains common practice to fix these grafts in a knee flexed position.

Methods

Nineteen participants underwent all-inside ACL reconstruction with optimally preconditioned 4 strand semitendinosus grafts using bi-cortical adjustable suspensory loop fixation. Using a computer navigation system, baseline measures of anisometricity, extension range, and tibial rotation were made. The graft was tensioned and provisionally fixed with the knee flexed 5° beyond its anisometric point and extension range recorded. The graft was then definitively fixed with the knee fully extended and extension range and tibial rotation recorded again. Anterior laxity measurements were made pre-operatively and postoperatively using a manual arthrometer and compared to those from the contralateral limb.

Results

Fixing the graft with the knee flexed produced a mean FD of 10.9° (p < 0.0001) and fixing in extension restored full extension (p = 0.661). Fixing in extension restored anterior laxity at 30° (p = 0.224) and at 90° (p = 0.668). There were very strong correlations between post-operative and control extension range (r = 0.931, p < 0.0001) and anterior laxity and 30° (r = 0.830, p < 0.0001) measures. Constraint of tibial internal rotation increased by 2.9° during the pivot-shift (p < 0.001) and increased with pivot shift grade (r = 0.474, p = 0.040).

Conclusion

Fixing rigid anatomic hamstring grafts in a knee flexed position routinely produces a flexion deformity. Tensioning and fixing grafts with the knee fully extended restores full extension and anterior laxity at 30° and 90°. Rotational constraint is significantly improved and correlates with the pivot-shift grade.

Clinical relevance

Rigid anatomic grafts should be tensioned and fixed with the knee fully extended.

Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement of Tripled Smaller-Diameter and Quadrupled Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Tibial Screw Fixation: A Biomechanical Full Construct Model

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of independent suture tape reinforcement on the dynamic elongation and stiffness behavior as well as ultimate strength of tripled smaller-diameter and quadrupled soft-tissue grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with tibial screw fixation in a biomechanical in vitro study.

METHODS

Tripled smaller-diameter (8 mm) and quadrupled (9 mm) bovine tendon grafts with and without suture tape reinforcement (n = 8 in each group) were tested using femoral suspensory and tibial interference screw fixation. The suture tape was femoral sided and fixed independent from the graft by passing it through the suspensory button and securing the 2 open tibial strands with a secondary interference screw. Dynamic testing was performed in position and force control at 250 N and 400 N, followed by pull to failure with the mode of failure noted. Dynamic elongation, stiffness, and ultimate strength were analyzed.

RESULTS

Tripled constructs showed a significantly worse structural performance than quadrupled constructs at higher loads. Reinforcement of tripled and quadrupled grafts substantially decreased total elongation by 56% (4.54 ± 0.75 mm vs 2.01 ± 0.50 mm, P < .001) and 39% (3.25 ± 0.49 mm vs 1.98 ± 0.51 mm, P < .001), respectively, by significantly increasing dynamic stiffness. No statistical significance was found between the reinforced groups. Failure loads of reinforced tripled (1,074 ± 148 N vs 829 ± 100 N, P = .003) and quadrupled (1,125 ± 157 N vs 939 ± 76 N, P = .023) grafts were also significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent reinforcement of soft-tissue grafts with suture tape strengthened the performance especially of tripled smaller-diameter grafts for ACLR with tibial screw fixation by significantly improving dynamic elongation at increased stiffness and ultimate strength. Quadrupled reinforced grafts showed no over-constraining and structurally behaved similarly to tripled grafts with reinforcement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Independent reinforcement for ACLR may provide an option for protecting autografts or allografts against irreversible lengthening during the maturation and remodeling phases of healing.

Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears-Part 2: The Role of Internal Bracing on Gap Formation and Stabilization of Repair Techniques

BACKGROUND

The latest biomechanical studies on some form of internal bracing have shown improved stabilization for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, but gap formation and load-sharing function have not yet been reported.

HYPOTHESIS

Internal bracing of an adjustable ACL repair construct provides improved stabilization with reduced gap formation and higher residual loading on the ACL.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Internally braced ACL repair constructs with single- and double-cinch loop (CL) cortical buttons, a knotless suture anchor, and a single-CL cortical button with adjustable loop fixation (CLS-ALD) were tested (n = 20 each) in a porcine model at 4 different loads (n = 5 each) over 4000 cycles at 0.75 Hz (n = 80 total). The CLS-ALD technique allowed for additional preconditioning (10 cycles at 0.5 Hz). Test results of the isolated internal brace groups served as a baseline for comparison. Lastly, specimens were pulled to failure (50 mm/min) with a cut internal brace. Final loading and gap formation on the ACL repair construct as well as ultimate strength were analyzed.

RESULTS

A statistical significance for peak loads over peak elongation was found between the CLS-ALD and all other reinforced groups (analysis of covariance, P < .001). Accordingly, the adjustable repair technique showed improved load-bearing capability with the internal brace compared with all other fixed repair groups and revealed significantly higher loads than the knotted single-CL group. Also, significantly reduced gap formation was found for the CLS-ALD compared with all other groups (P < .001), with no gap formation up to 150 N with a final gap of 0.85 ± 0.31 mm at 350 N. A significantly higher ultimate failure load (866.2 ± 104.0 N; P < .001) was found for the button-fixed internal brace group compared with all other groups.

CONCLUSION

Internal bracing had a crucial role in improving the stabilization potential of ACL repair at loads occurring during normal daily activity. The added strength of the internal brace allowed for reducing peak loads on the ACL repair construct as well as restricting gap formation to below 3 mm at loads up to 350 N.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Improvements in the mechanical characteristics of current ACL repair techniques that enable reduced gap formation and allow for early range of motion and accelerated rehabilitation may strengthen the self-healing response with the formation of stable scar tissue.

Late Migration of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

A unique case of late migration of an adjustable-loop femoral fixation button utilized during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is presented. Imaging and physical examinations during the patient's postoperative course were unremarkable for graft or hardware failure. Two years postoperatively, symptomatic hardware migration occurred requiring arthroscopic removal. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of late migration of an adjustable-loop femoral fixation button in ACL reconstruction. This case highlights that late loosening and migration of adjustable-loop femoral fixation devices in ACL reconstruction can occur despite demonstrated postoperative radiographic and clinical stability. Surgeons utilizing this fixation device should be aware of this potential complication to avoid delayed recognition and patient morbidity.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes and tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed with an all-inside technique (Group A) or with a bioabsorbable tibial screw and suspensory femoral fixation (Group B).

METHODS

Tunnel widening was assessed using computed tomography (CT) and a previously validated analytical best fit cylinder technique at approximately 1-year following ACLR. Clinical follow-up comprised evaluation with IKDC, KSS, Tegner, Lysholm scores, and knee laxity assessment.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 22 patients in each group with a median clinical follow-up of 24 months (range 21-27 months). The median duration between ACLR and CT was 13 months (range 12-14 months). There were no significant differences in clinical outcome measures between groups. There were no differences between groups with respect to femoral tunnel widening. However, there was a significantly larger increase in tibial tunnel widening, at the middle portion, in Group B (2.4 ± 1.5 mm) compared to Group A (0.8 ± 0.4 mm) (p = 0.027), and also at the articular portion in Group B (1.5 ± 0.8 mm) compared to Group A (0.8 ± 0.8 mm) (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Tibial tunnel widening after ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft is significantly greater with suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw when compared to an all-inside technique at a median follow-up of 2 years. The clinical relevance of this work lies in the rebuttal of concerns arising from biomechanical studies regarding the possibility of increased tunnel widening with an all-inside technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

All-Inside Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction via the Transtibial Approach With a Laser-Tip Guide System for Drilling

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an all-inside method to reduce bone damage caused by drill hole preparation and enhance the stability of the reconstructed ligament in the drill hole has been reported in recent years. We made a custom-designed drill guide pin and reamer, which are assembled in the joint, to create drill holes in the femur and tibia. For the transtibial method, our femoral drill hole-positioning technique, which uses a laser, is extremely convenient for accurate positioning of the drill holes. Therefore, a combination of these methods facilitates implementation of the all-inside double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Conditioning Required to Prevent an Abnormal Lachman and Pivot Shift After ACL Reconstruction: A Robotic Study of 3 ACL Graft Constructs

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft conditioning protocols to decrease postoperative increases in anterior tibial translation and pivot-shift instability have not been established.

PURPOSE

To determine what ACL graft conditioning protocols should be performed at surgery to decrease postoperative graft elongation after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator evaluated 3 ACL graft constructs in 7 cadaver knees for a total of 19 graft specimens. Knees were tested before and after ACL sectioning and after ACL graft conditioning protocols before reconstruction. The ACL grafts consisted of a 6-strand semitendinosus-gracilis TightRope, bone-patellar tendon-bone TightRope, and bone-patellar tendon-bone with interference screws. Two graft conditioning protocols were used: (1) graft board tensioning (20 minutes, 80 N) and (2) cyclic conditioning (5°-120° of flexion, 90-N anterior tibial load) after graft reconstruction to determine the number of cycles needed to obtain a steady state with no graft elongation. After conditioning, the grafts were cycled a second time under anterior-posterior loading (100 N, 25° of flexion) and under pivot-shift loading (100 N anterior, 5-N·m internal rotation, 7 N·m valgus) to verify that the ACL flexion-extension conditioning protocol was effective.

RESULTS

Graft board tensioning did not produce a steady-state graft. Major increases in anterior tibial translation occurred in the flexion-extension graft-loading protocol at 25° of flexion (mean ± SD: semitendinosus-gracilis TightRope, 3.4 ± 1.1 mm; bone-patellar tendon-bone TightRope, 3.2 ± 1.0 mm; bone-patellar tendon-bone with interference screws, 2.4 ± 1.5 mm). The second method of graft conditioning (40 cycles, 5°-120° of flexion, 90-N anterior load) produced a stable conditioned state for all grafts, as the anterior translations of the anterior-posterior and pivot-shift cycles were statistically equivalent ( P < .05, 1-20 cycles).

CONCLUSION

ACL graft board conditioning protocols are not effective, leading to deleterious ACL graft elongations after reconstruction. A secondary ACL graft conditioning protocol of 40 flexion-extension cycles under 90-N graft loading was required for a well-conditioned graft, preventing further elongation and restoring normal anterior-posterior and pivot-shift translations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

There is a combined need for graft board tensioning and robust cyclic ACL graft loading before final graft fixation to restore knee stability.

Intraoperative Preconditioning of Fixed and Adjustable Loop Suspensory Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Tibial Screw Fixation-An In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation Using a Porcine Model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of preconditioning according to intraoperative workflow on initial tension and elongation behavior for femoral adjustable loop devices (ALDs) and closed loop devices (CLDs) in suspensory anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with tibial screw fixation in a biomechanical in vitro study.

METHODS

Three ACLR groups with tibial screw fixation were biomechanically tested in a full-construct setup using porcine tibias. Groups (n = 8 per group) varied by femoral fixation method and consisted of a CLD (group 3) and ALD fixation with (group 2) and without simulated intraoperative preconditioning (group 1). The change in tension after screw insertion and the displacement to restore the initial loading situation were measured. Grafts underwent dynamic cycling (1,000 cycles at 0.75 Hz) using both a position and a force control mode.

RESULTS

Data are presented as mean [standard deviation]. Placement of an interference screw induced a graft tension loss of 62% (49.4 [0.4] N vs 19.0 [10.0] N, P < .001) by introducing a laxity of 0.53 [0.26] mm. Intraoperative preconditioning led to a higher initial load level (228.3 [19.8] N) compared with unconditioned ALD (156.1 [25.5] N, P < .001) and CLD groups (156.6 [12.8] N, P < .001) with less force decrease over position-controlled cyclic loading. Furthermore, initial (-0.22 [0.16] mm) and dynamic elongation (0.88 [0.23] mm) were reduced compared with the unconditioned ALD (0.65 [0.35] mm, P < .001; and 1.56 [0.19] mm, P < .001) and CLD groups (0.16 [0.26] mm, P < .001; and 1.64 [0.24] mm, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ACLR with femoral ALD fixation and intraoperative preconditioning allows for restoration of time-zero screw-imparted slack and leads to significantly reduced cyclic elongation in accordance with native ACL function. Both ALD and CLD control groups behaved similarly, with total elongation less than 3 mm including time-zero slack.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although the clinical relevance of time-zero graft tension loss is uncertain, the use of an ALD in concert with tibial screw fixation may be favorable to allow for tension optimization.

Adjustable- Versus Fixed-Loop Devices for Femoral Fixation in ACL Reconstruction: An In Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Study of Surgical Technique-Based Tibial Fixation and Graft Preparation

Background

Femoral suspensory fixation for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has evolved from fixed- to adjustable-loop devices. However, there are still controversies regarding undesired lengthening of adjustable-loop devices.

Hypothesis

Adjustable-loop fixation will achieve similar elongation to that of fixed-loop devices, and intraoperative preconditioning will reduce initial elongation for adjustable-loop constructs.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

Three adjustable-loop devices (GraftMax, TightRope, and Ultrabutton) and 2 fixed-loop devices (Endobutton and RetroButton) were used in an intraoperative surgical technique workflow according to an in vitro model with porcine bone and bovine tendons (8 specimens per device; N = 40 constructs tested). Each construct underwent 1000 cycles of position- and force-controlled dynamic loading, whereby a total elongation threshold of 3 mm was defined as clinical failure. Constructs were finally pulled to failure at 50 mm/min.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences among the devices for total or dynamic elongation. Total elongation (mean ± SD) for adjustable-loop constructs was 4.13 ± 1.46 mm for GraftMax, 2.78 ± 0.85 mm for TightRope, and 2.76 ± 0.45 mm for Ultrabutton; for the fixed-loop devices, total elongation was 2.85 ± 0.74 mm for Endobutton and 2.85 ± 1.03 mm for RetroButton. The GraftMax had a significantly lower initial force (95.5 ± 58.0 N) after retensioning, with the highest initial elongation (0.99 ± 0.60 mm). The Ultrabutton showed the greatest force loss (-105.9 ± 13.5 N) during position control cycling, which was significantly different from the GraftMax (-22.3 ± 28.2 N), with the smallest force loss (P < .001). The TightRope construct had a significantly smaller initial elongation (-0.36 ± 0.22 mm) and the greatest pull-to-failure load (958 ± 40 N) as compared with all of the other devices.

Conclusion

Adjustable- and fixed-loop configurations achieved statistically comparable fixation strength for total elongation. However, the GraftMax construct exceeded the total elongation threshold of clinical failure. The Ultrabutton produced the greatest loss of force during position control cycling, and the GraftMax button design prevented proper retensioning. The TightRope had a significant greater ultimate strength when compared with all other devices.

Clinical Relevance

Biomechanical testing according to a surgical technique workflow suggests that adjustable-loop devices can be considered a safe alternative to fixed-loop devices in ACL reconstruction.