Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair Restores Contact Pressure and Contact Area to Its Native State Even After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

Generating New Meniscus Therapies via Recent Breakthroughs in Development, Model Systems, and Clinical Diagnostics

Over 850,000 surgeries are performed to treat meniscal injuries each year in the United States. Even with repair, patients are likely to develop osteoarthritis (OA) within the next two decades. There is a pressing clinical need to improve meniscal repair procedures to restore tissue function and prevent joint degeneration later in life. Here we present a review of recently published articles (2020-2024) spanning basic science, translational, and clinical studies to highlight new advances in meniscus research across development, animal models, finite element models, and clinical interventions. Key progenitor cell populations and vascularity changes have been identified in human meniscus tissue development, aging, and degeneration with implications for novel tissue repair strategies. The use of animal and finite element models has expanded our understanding of meniscus tissue function and evaluated new therapies in preclinical studies. Further, advances in clinical diagnostics with machine learning models and surgical techniques have shed light on evidence-based practices for improving patient outcomes. We discuss across multiple length scales (micro-, meso-, macro-) the structure-function relationship of the meniscus in development and disease, recent advances in models and tools to study the meniscus, knowledge gaps in the field, persisting challenges in clinical treatments and assessments, and the translation of basic science therapies into the clinic.

High Tibial Osteotomy Alone Does Not Decrease Medial Meniscus Extrusion in the Setting of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

To investigate whether inducing valgus alignment and shifting the load laterally through high tibial osteotomy (HTO) alone decreases the extent of medial meniscus extrusion (MME) in the setting of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) using ultrasound evaluation.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knee specimens were tested using a 6-degree-of-freedom robotic testing system and ultrasound. Each specimen was tested in 5 conditions: (1) intact, (2) MMPRT, (3) medial meniscus repair (MMR), (4) combined medial open-wedge HTO + MMR, and (5) HTO + MMPRT. Measurements were obtained over the medial collateral ligament (central image) and posterior to the medial collateral ligament (posterior image) with a 250-N axial load at 0°, 30°, and 90° of knee flexion. Statistical analysis was performed using a 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

MME was significantly greater in HTO + MMPRT (0°: 2.44 ± 0.41 mm, 30°: 2.47 ± 0.37 mm, 90°: 2.41 ± 0.28 mm) than HTO + MMR in central images (mean difference +0.83 mm, P < .001). No significant difference was found between HTO + MMPRT and MMPRT in MME. MMR had significantly less MME than MMPRT (mean difference -0.58 mm, P < .001, posterior image at 0° and central image at 90°, P = .002). HTO + MMR showed significantly less MME than MMR alone at 30° and 90° of knee flexion in the central image (30°: -0.38 ± 0.05 mm, 90°: -0.45 ± 0.06 mm, P < .001) and 90° of knee flexion in the posterior image (-0.38 ± 0.08 mm, P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

HTO alone did not decrease MME in the setting of MMPRT, while MMR alone decreased MME after MMPRT. Additionally, HTO + MMR decreased MME after MMPRT compared to MMR alone, although the clinical significance was uncertain.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The findings of this study provide clinicians with valuable insights for improving MME. HTO alone does not decrease MME in cases of MMPRT.

Editorial Commentary: Medial Meniscal Root Repair Should Be Combined With High Tibial Osteotomy in Cases of Meniscal Extrusion

Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) is classically defined as radial displacement of ≥3 mm outside the tibial border. MME is usually seen in middle-aged patients, and it is strongly associated with medial meniscus root (MMR) pathology and medial femorotibial compartment degenerative change. MMR tears are associated with cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle (89%) and MME ≥3 mm (67%). If MMR tears are associated with MME, high tibial osteotomy combined with MMR repair may reduce MME and protect the medial compartment. Recent research shows combined MMR repair and high tibial osteotomy yield improved radiographic and functional outcomes.

Editorial Commentary: Treatment Options for Medial Meniscal Root Tears Include Repair, With High Tibial Osteotomy When Indicated, and Reconstruction for Irreparable Tears

Medial meniscal root tears (MMRTs) are currently a hot topic at the result of their associated morbidity. Because of mixed evidence, controversy regarding whether to repair these tears in all scenarios and in all patient populations remains. Further, even with a successful repair, there may still be postoperative extrusion. Now in addition to the decision to repair is the decision to reconstruct with a gracilis autograft, which has the potential to reduce extrusion and improve outcomes. This is a much more complex surgery than medial meniscal root repair (MMRR) that is associated with both greater technical skill on the surgeon and greater patient morbidity from the graft harvest. Over time, we will see whether the benefits outweigh the increased complexity and risk of reconstruction versus repair. These results will determine whether medial meniscal posterior root reconstruction is discarded or becomes the new standard of care for medial meniscal posterior root tears.

Biomechanical effects of LCWHTO vs. MOWHTO on medial meniscus posterior root repair: a finite element analysis

Whether isolated high tibial osteotomy (HTO) or HTO combined with medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) repair is the optimal surgical treatment of MMPR tears remains controversial. This study compared the biomechanical effects of isolated HTO versus MMPR repair combined with medial open wedge HTO (MOWHTO) or lateral closed wedge HTO (LCWHTO) using finite element analysis (FEA). In this study, the MRI and CT data of the knee joint were used to create an FEA model. MOWHTO and LCWHTO simulations adjusted the mechanical axis to the Fujisawa point, with MMPR conditions simulated as intact, tear, or repaired. The ankle center was fixed and a 1000 N force was applied to the knee. In the LCWHTO models, the posterior tibial slope (PTS) decreased, whereas it increased in the MOWHTO models. Changes in the PTS following HTO influenced the stress distribution in the MMPR. HTO combined with MMPR repair showed a reduction in the maximum contact stress by 5.4-11.4% and increased contact area by 29.5-41.0% in the medial knee compartment relative to isolated HTO. This study demonstrated that MMPR repair combined with LCWHTO would be more protective against stress loading in the MMPR than MMPR repair combined with MOWHTO or isolated HTO.

Pressure Sensors for Measuring Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics in Meniscal Root Repair: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Tibiofemoral contact mechanics (TFCM) is an accepted biomechanical metrics for evaluating the meniscus in its intact, torn, and repaired states. Pressure sensors are increasingly used, with accuracy and repeatability influenced by test conditions, their design, and their properties. To identify factors optimising performance, we performed a systematic review of the literature on their use for measuring TFCM in posterior meniscal root tears.

METHODS

The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, and Embase were used to perform a systematic review using the PRISMA criteria. As laboratory and surgical setup can influence sensor performance, we collected data on specimen preparation, repair techniques, hardware use, and biomechanical testing parameters.

RESULTS

24 biomechanical studies were included. Specimen preparations were similar across studies with respect to femoral and tibial mounting. Single axial compressive forces were applied between 100 and 1800 N at varying flexion angles (0-90°). Tekscan (Boston, MA, USA) was the commonest sensor used to measure TFCM, followed by digital capacitive sensors and Fujifilm (Tokyo, Japan). Factors influencing their performance included fluid exposure, lack of adequate fixation, non-specific calibration protocols, load saturation exceeding calibration, damaged sensels and inappropriate pre-test conditioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding potential factors influencing pressure sensors may improve accuracy, area, and pressure distribution measurements.

Effect of preoperative medial meniscus status on the outcomes of high tibial osteotomy with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells cartilage regeneration

BACKGROUND

The effect of medial meniscus (MM) status on outcomes following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) combined with cartilage regeneration using human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs) remains unclear.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative MM status on the outcomes of HTO combined with cartilage regeneration using hUCB-MSCs. Specifically, clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between two groups of patients, which were divided according to their preoperative MM status. We hypothesized that patients with preserved meniscal integrity or those who underwent meniscal root repair would show better clinical and radiological outcomes compared to those with significant meniscal loss or untreated root tears.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 47 patients who underwent HTO with hUCB-MSC implantation. Patients were divided into group P (preserved MM integrity or medial meniscal root repair) and group L (loss of MM integrity, defined as a peripheral rim width <3 mm, unable to maintain hoop function). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Cartilage regeneration was evaluated with Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) 2.0 score and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Repair Assessment (CRA) score from second-look arthroscopy. Correlation analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between preoperative MM extrusion and cartilage repair.

RESULTS

Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in IKDC and WOMAC scores (p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between groups in IKDC and WOMAC scores at final follow-up (p = 0.21, p = 0.42, respectively). MOCART 2.0 and ICRS CRA scores showed no significant differences between groups (p = 0.35, p = 0.08, respectively). Group P showed higher proportions of favorable outcomes compared to group L, including no major subchondral changes or only minor marrow edema (56% vs. 31.8%) and ICRS CRA grades I or II (84% vs. 72.7%). While these findings suggest potential differences in outcomes, neither comparison reached statistical significance (p = 0.09 and p = 0.48, respectively). Preoperative MM extrusion negatively correlated with MOCART 2.0 and subchondral bone changes (r = -0.24, p = 0.03; r = -0.29, p = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HTO with hUCB-MSC implantation provided significant clinical improvements and effective cartilage regeneration regardless of preoperative MM status. However, preoperative MM extrusion may influence subchondral bone changes, emphasizing the need to consider MM status for long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective comparative study.

Posteromedial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy has favourable outcomes in simultaneous medial meniscus posterior root repair and varus medial knee osteoarthritis patients without concomitant root tear

PURPOSE

To evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes in two patient groups: first, varus aligned medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) patients who underwent posteromedial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (PMOWHTO) and simultaneous root repair; second, patients with varus medial knee osteoarthritis without MMPRT who underwent PMOWHTO.

METHODS

Patients had MMPRT repair concomitant with PMOWHTO and varus medial knee osteoarthritis without concomitant root tear patients who underwent PMOWHTO and were reviewed. Radiographic parameters, medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and Knee Society Scores [KSSs, including the following subscores: knee score (KS) and knee function score (KFS)] were evaluated. Continious variables are expressed as the median and interquartile range (IQR) [IQR: (Q1;Q3); Q1: median of lower half, Q3: median of upper half]. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months [29 (28;35) months].

RESULTS

A total of 36 knees of 34 patients underwent PMOWHTO were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of a MMPRT. Nineteen of the 36 knees had MMPRTs, and all of them had concomitant root repair (Group 1). Seventeen of the 36 patients did not have MMPRTs (Group 2). The posterior tibial slope (PTS) decreased postoperatively in a total of 36 knees (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in MME postoperatively in any intragroup comparison. The preoperative and follow-up MMEs of Group 1 were greater than those of Group 2 (p < 0.001). The KSs and KFSs in both Group 1 and Group 2 increased during follow-up [KS; Group 1: 43 (36;53) vs. 86 (84;95), p < 0.001. Group 2: 49 (45;57) vs. 89 (80;93), p < 0.001. KFS; Group 1: 60 (50;60) vs. 90 (80;100), p < 0.001. Group 2: 60 (50;60) vs. 80 (80;90), p < 0.001]. All knees achieved minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in terms of KSs. Eighteen (95%) knees achieved MCID in Group 1, and 17 (100%) achieved MCID in Group 2 in terms of KFSs. There were no differences between Groups 1 and 2 in terms of preoperative and follow-up KSs or preoperative KFSs. The follow-up KFSs in Group 1 was significantly greater than that in Group 2 (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

PMOWHTO has favourable clinical and radiological outcomes and prevents PTS increase in simultaneous MMPRT repair and varus medial knee osteoarthritis patients without concomitant root tear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Transtibial pullout repair improved short-term clinical outcomes in patients with oblique medial meniscus posterior root tear comparable to radial root tear

PURPOSE

Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (PRT) can lead to excessive knee loading and unsatisfactory clinical outcomes after non-operative treatment or meniscectomy. Although favourable clinical outcomes after MM posterior root (PR) repair have been reported, no study has specifically investigated the outcomes of different types of MMPRT. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with complete radial and oblique MMPRT following MMPR repair.

METHODS

Forty patients who had undergone MMPR repair were retrospectively investigated. Patients with type 2 (20 knees) and 4 MMPRT (20 knees) were included in this study. The MMPRT type was classified according to the LaPrade classification. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance images, arthroscopic findings, and pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 1 year postoperatively, clinical outcomes notably improved in patients with type 2 and 4 MMPRT. No significant differences were observed in any of the evaluations between these patients, both before and after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Patients with type 2 and type 4 MMPRT exhibited significantly improved clinical outcomes. MMPR repair is beneficial in treating type 2 and type 4 MMPRT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Meniscus Reconstruction Using Autologous Tendon Combined With Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Technique to Achieve Rigid Fixation and Avoid Interference Between Locking Screws and Tibial Bone Tunnel

Meniscal posterior root tears reportedly result in accelerated cartilage degeneration and spontaneous insufficiency fractures of the knee. While meniscus repair combined with open-wedge high tibial osteotomy is an optional method, the healing rate is not sufficiently high. Therefore, this Technical Note describes a technique for meniscal reconstruction combined with open-wedge high tibial osteotomy that may offer improvements in meniscal healing rates and clinical results.

Mid-term patient-reported outcomes are inferior in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy patients with untreated medial meniscus posterior root tear

Purpose

The impact of untreated medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tear (MMPRT) during opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains poorly understood. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between the presence of MMPRT and post-operative PROs in patients who underwent OWHTO.

Methods

A total of 83 knees that underwent OWHTO that were followed up for 6.6 years were included. Post-operative PROs were assessed using the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) subscales. Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MMPRT was diagnosed based on preoperative MRI and intraoperative arthroscopy findings. The participants were categorized into the MMPRT and MMPR intact (MMPRI) groups, and their KOOS subscales were compared. Additionally, logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the correlation between KOOS and MMPRT presence.

Results

In total, 29 out of 80 (36.3%) knees were classified into the MMPRT group, while three knees underwent total knee arthroplasty. Preoperative MME was 3.5 ± 1.9 (range 0-8.9) mm, showing correlation with the presence of MMPRT (p = 0.004) by regression analysis. The post-operative KOOS subscales of the MMPRT group were lower than the MMPRI group for pain (p = 0.017), activities of daily living (ADLs) (p = 0.001), sports (p < 0.001) and quality of life (QOL) (p < 0.001). Additionally, regression analysis showed the presence of MMPRT was correlated with lower KOOS subscale scores for pain (p = 0.041), ADLs (p = 0.011), sports (p < 0.001) and QOL (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Preoperative MMPRT correlated with a reduction in mid-term post-operative PROs, as assessed using the KOOS, among patients who underwent OWHTO. Surgeons should consider addressing an MMPRT at the time of OWHTO.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Arthroscopic Medial Meniscus Posterior Horn Direct Anchor Root Repair: Transtibial Approach With Knotless Adjustable Aperture Fixation

The integrity of the posterior meniscus root attachment is vital for the preservation of knee joint biomechanics. Meniscus root tears treated nonoperatively or with meniscectomy lead to poor functional outcomes and progressive knee degeneration. Repair returns knee biomechanics back to the intact state and has an established record of positive mid-term to long-term results. Although transtibial pullout repair has been the gold standard, innovation is needed to overcome the limitations inherent to traditional approaches. The latest generation of transtibial pullout repair devices is adjustable, permits suture anchor placement directly into the root footprint, and has demonstrated encouraging early results in biomechanical analysis. This Technical Note describes an arthroscopic technique for medial meniscus posterior root repair that uses a knotless adjustable implant (SutureLoc; Arthrex) for aperture fixation via a transtibial approach with intratunnel soft anchor direct fixation and rip-stop suture configuration.

Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A state-of-the-art review

Medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis is a common condition that is frequently associated with significant pain and dysfunction. Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) offers a unique opportunity to preserve the knee joint and potentially alter the course of the degenerative process. Recent advances in this field of surgery have enabled surgeons to perform a MOWHTO in a safe, reliable and reproducible manner. This state-of-the-art review highlights the most important advances in the field of MOWHTO. Key concepts related to patient selection, pre-operative planning, surgical accuracy and patient outcome are considered. The importance of an individualized approach is emphasized and its influence on the future direction of the procedure is discussed.

Repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear is effective for root healing and cartilage regeneration in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether the repair of a medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is effective for MMPRT healing, cartilage regeneration, and clinical outcomes in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 80 patients who underwent OWHTO and subsequent second-look arthroscopy. The patients were divided into OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair (n = 40) and OWHTO alone (n = 40) groups, and the healing rates (complete/partial/failure) were compared. Each group was further divided into over- and under-corrected subgroups to compare healing rates. The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade, cartilage defect size, Koshino stage, ICRS cartilage repair assessment score of the medial femoral condyle (MFC), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores between the OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair and OWHTO alone groups were compared according to whether microfracture was performed on the MFC.

RESULTS

The overall healing rate of the MMPRT was higher in the OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair group than that in the OWHTO alone group (P < 0.001). In addition, in the subgroup analysis, no difference in the MMPRT healing rate between the over-correction and under-correction groups when MMPRT repair was performed (n.s). In contrast, without MMPRT repair, the healing rate was lower in the under-correction group than that in the over-correction group (P = 0.03). Cartilage regeneration of the OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair group was superior to that of the OWHTO alone group (P < 0.05). The IKDC subjective scores of the OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair and OWHTO alone groups were 34.5 and 33.1 before surgery (n.s) and 50 and 47.2 at one year after surgery, respectively (n.s). These differences between the two groups for cartilage regeneration and IKDC subjective scores showed the same pattern regardless of microfractures.

CONCLUSIONS

MMPRT repair during OWHTO might improve MMPRT healing, even with under-correction, and cartilage regeneration of MFC, regardless of microfracture. However, OWHTO with MMPRT repair might not improve short-term clinical outcomes compared to OWHTO alone. Further randomized clinical trials are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective cohort study.

Type of medial meniscus tear does not affect the clinical and radiological outcomes of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) on radiological and clinical outcomes after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent MOWHTO (113 knees) at our hospital between September 2012 and June 2020 and who were followed up for > 2 years. The radiological and clinical outcomes were compared between the MMPRT group (52 knees), who included patients with MMPRT, and the non-MMPRT group (61 knees), who comprised patients without meniscal tear or with any type of meniscal tear other than MMPRT. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting osteoarthritis (OA) progression after MOWHTO.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 40.6 ± 14.2 months. The mean ages of the MMPRT and non-MMPRT groups were 56.9 ± 6.4 and 54.4 ± 6.1 years, respectively (p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in the last follow-up radiological and clinical outcomes between the two groups. In the logistic regression analysis, the postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle was a risk factor of OA progression after MOWHTO (odds ratio 0.7; 95% confidence interval 0.5-0.9; p = 0.006), and the type of medial meniscus tear was not associated with OA progression (p = n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

In the short- to mid-term follow-up of MOWHTO, the radiological or clinical outcomes of patients with MMPRT were not inferior to those of patients without MMPRT. Postoperative lower extremity alignment, but not MMPRT, was a factor influencing MOWHTO prognosis. Concurrent root repair in HTO will restore the anatomy better; however, its effect on progression of OA is yet to be proven.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Increased Medial Femoral Condyle Angle and Narrow Intercondylar Notch Are Associated With Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear

PURPOSE

To investigate the correlation between nontraumatic medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) and bone morphology of the knee with a particular emphasis on MMPR impingement.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were examined between January 2018 and December 2020. MRI findings of patients with traumatic MMPRT, Kellgren Lawrence stage 3-4 arthropathy on radiographs, single- or multiple-ligament injuries and/or those who underwent treatment for these diseases, and surgery in and around the knee were excluded from the study. MRI measurements included medial femoral condylar angle (MFCA), intercondylar distance (ICD), and intercondylar notch width (ICNW), distal/posterior medial femoral condylar offset ratio, notch shape, medial tibial slope (MTS) angle, and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) measurements and spur presence and were compared between groups. All measurements were performed by two board-certified orthopedic surgeons on a best agreement basis.

RESULTS

MRI examinations of patients aged 40-60 were analyzed. MRI findings were divided into two groups: the study group of MRI findings of patients with MMPRT (n = 100) and the control group of MRI findings of patients without MMPRT (n = 100). MFCA was found to be significantly higher in the study group (mean: 46.5 ± 3.58) than in the control group (mean: 40.04 ± 4.61) (P < .001). In the study group, the ICD (study group mean: 76.26 ± 4.89; control group mean: 78.18 ± 6.1) was significantly narrower (P = .018), and the ICNW (study group mean: 17.19 ± 2.23; control group mean: 20.48 ± 2.13) was significantly shorter (P < .001). The ICNW/ICD ratio was significantly lower in patients in the study group (0.22 ± 0.02) than in the control group (0.25 ± 0.02) (P < .001). Bone spurs were present in 84% of the study group and only in 28% of those in the control group. In the study group, the most common notch type was A-type with 78%, while the least common was the U-type notch with 10%. However, in the control group, the most common notch type was A-type with 43%, and the least common was the W-type notch with 22%. The distal/posterior medial femoral condylar offset ratio was statistically lower in the study group (0.72 ± 0.07) than in the control group 0.78 ± 0.07) (P < .001). No significant intergroup differences were found in MTS (study group mean: 7.51 ±2.59; control group mean: 7.83 ± 2.57) (P = .390) and MPTA (study group mean: 86.92 ±2.15; control group mean: 87.48 ±1.8) measurements (P = .67).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased medial femoral condylar angle, low distal/posterior femoral offset ratio, narrow intercondylar distance and intercondylar notch width, A-type notch shape, and spur presence are associated with MMPRT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Editorial Commentary: High Tibial Osteotomy May Not Be Required With Medial Meniscus Root Repair

Meniscal root tears are defined as tears within 10 mm of their attachment and are more commonly observed in middle-aged patients. They have been named the silent epidemic and are equivalent to a total meniscectomy. Basic science studies have shown that posterior meniscus root repairs restore both contact area and pressure to its native state. The role of an additional high tibial osteotomy is not clear yet. High tibial osteotomies are commonly used to correct varus malalignment, a condition that is often observed with these tears. However, an additional osteotomy does not seem to offer any additional clinical benefits with regards to clinical and radiologic outcomes. It also has no effect with regards to contact pressure and contact area and is not related to the degree of deformity correction.