The impact of older age on long term survival in living donor liver transplantation: A propensity score matching analysis

Age Matters: What Affects the Cumulative Lifespan of a Transplanted Liver?

OBJECTIVE

To assess factors affecting the cumulative lifespan of a transplanted liver.

BACKGROUND

Liver aging is different from other solid organs. It is unknown how old a liver can actually get after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Deceased donor liver transplants from 1988 to 2021 were queried from the United States UNOS registry. Cumulative liver age was calculated as donor age + recipient graft survival.

RESULTS

In total, 184,515 livers were included. Most were donation after brain death donors (n = 175,343). The percentage of livers achieving >70, 80, 90, and 100 years cumulative age was 7.8% (n = 14,392), 1.9% (n = 3576), 0.3% (n = 528), and 0.01% (n = 21), respectively. The youngest donor age contributing to a cumulative liver age >90 years was 59 years, with posttransplant survival of 34 years. In pediatric recipients, 736 (4.4%) and 282 livers (1.7%) survived >50 and 60 years overall, respectively. Transplanted livers achieved cumulative age >90 years in 2.86 per 1000 and >100 years in 0.1 per 1000. The U.S. population at large has a cumulative "liver age" >90 years in 5.35 per 1000 persons, and >100 years in 0.2 per 1000. Livers aged >60 years at transplant experienced both improved cumulative survival ( P < 0.0001) and interestingly improved survival after transplantation ( P < 0.0001). Recipient warm ischemia time of >30 minutes was most predictive of reduced cumulative liver survival overall (n = 184,515, hazard ratio = 1.126, P < 0.001) and excluding patients with mortality in the first 6 months (n = 151,884, hazard ratio = 0.973, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, transplanted livers frequently get as old as those in the average population despite ischemic-reperfusion-injury and immunosuppression. The presented results justify using older donor livers regardless of donation type, even in sicker recipients with limited options.

Early Graft Failure After Living-Donor Liver Transplant

BACKGROUND

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been increasing in the USA. While data exist on longer-term patient and graft outcomes, a contemporary analysis of short-term outcomes is needed.

AIM

Evaluate short-term (30-day) graft failure rates and identify predictors associated with these outcomes.

METHODS

Adult (≥ 18) LDLT recipients from 01/2004 to 12/2021 were analyzed from the United States Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Graft status at 30 days was assessed with graft failure defined as retransplantation or death. Comparison of continuous and categorical variables was performed and a multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors of early graft failure.

RESULTS

During the study period, 4544 LDLTs were performed with a graft failure rate of 3.4% (155) at 30 days. Grafts from male donors (aOR: 0.63, CI 0.44-0.89), right lobe grafts (aOR: 0.40, CI 0.27-0.61), recipients aged > 60 years (aOR: 0.52, CI 0.32-0.86), and higher recipient albumin (aOR: 0.73, CI 0.57-0.93) were associated with superior early graft outcomes, whereas Asian recipient race (vs. White; aOR: 3.75, CI 1.98-7.10) and a history of recipient PVT (aOR: 2.7, CI 1.52-4.78) were associated with inferior outcomes. LDLTs performed during the most recent 2016-2021 period (compared to 2004-2009 and 2010-2015) resulted in significantly superior outcomes (aOR: 0.45, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that while short-term adult LDLT graft failure is uncommon, there are opportunities for optimizing outcomes by prioritizing right lobe donation, improving candidate nutritional status, and careful pre-transplant risk assessment of candidates with known PVT. Notably, a period effect exists whereby increased LDLT experience in the most recent era correlated with improved outcomes.

Survival after LDLT in recipients ≥70 years old in the United States. An OPTN/UNOS liver transplant registry analysis

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the elderly population is currently not well studied. There are single-center studies indicating that patient age should not be a barrier to LDLT, with similar outcomes compared to younger recipients.

METHODS

Using UNOS/STAR data from 2010 to 2022 we retrospectively analyzed patients ≥70 years old receiving a living donor graft (LDLT ≥70y group) versus a deceased donor graft (DDLT ≥70y group). In addition, we compared recipients ≥70 years old undergoing LDLT versus patients 18-69 years old also undergoing LDLT. Donor and recipient baseline characteristics, as well as postoperative outcomes including graft and patient survival were analyzed and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Recipients in the LDLT ≥70y group showed less disease burden and spent significantly less time on the waitlist when compared to recipients in the DDLT ≥70y group (102 [49-201] days versus 170 [36-336] days) respectively; p = .004. With the exception of a longer length of stay (LOS) in the LDLT ≥70y group (p ≤ .001), postoperative outcomes were comparable with recipients in the DDLT ≥70y group, including similar graft and patient survival rates at 1-, 3-, and 5-years. When compared to younger recipients of a graft from a living donor, patients in the LDLT ≥70y group had similar post-transplant functional status, re-transplant rates and similar causes contributing to graft failure. However, significantly lower graft and patient survival rates were observed.

CONCLUSION

LDLT for recipients aged 70 or greater represents a faster access to transplantation in a safe and feasible manner when compared to similar- aged recipients undergoing DDLT.