The economic burdens of anastomotic leakage for patients undergoing colorectal surgery in Japan

Efficacy of transanal drainage tubes in postoperative anastomotic leakage in patients with laparoscopic anterior rectal resection without diverting stoma

To assess whether transanal drainage tubes (TDT) protect against anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients without diverting stomas (DS) after laparoscopic anterior rectal resection (LAR). In the TDT group, after anastomosis of the sigmoid colon to the rectum, a 32F silicone tube was inserted through the anus with the tip of the tube exceeding the anastomosis by more than 5 cm. The tube was secured around the anus with a skin suture and a drainage bag was attached. It was left in place for 3-5 days postoperatively in the TDT group. In the No-TDT group, no transanal silicone tube drainage was used after the anastomosis. A total of 927 patients (620 in the no-TDT group and 307 in the TDT group) were included in the analysis, and a total of 50 (5.4%) patients were observed to develop AL. After using propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce baseline feature imbalances between the two groups, there were 287 patients in both groups, and the mean retention time of TDT was (4.7 ± 1.2) d. The incidence of AL in the TDT group was significantly lower than that in the no-TDT group (3.8% vs. 8.0%, with a the incidence of AL in the TDT group was significantly lower than that in the non-TDT group (3.8% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.034), but the incidence of AL classification was similar (P = 0.709). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications and postoperative recovery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that TDT was found to be an independent protective factor for postoperative AL (OR 0.437, 95% CI 0.207-0.923, P = 0.030). The elective use of TDT is a simple and effective protective measure for the prevention of AL in patients without stoma after LAR surgery, helping to reduce the probability of AL. This may be a potential alternative DS method for the appropriate population.

Comparison of robotic assisted and laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer with or without left colic artery preservation

The preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) during rectal cancer resection remains a topic of controversy, and there is a notable absence of robust evidence regarding the outcomes associated with LCA preservation. And the advantages of robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) surgery in rectal resection remain uncertain. The objective of this study was to assess the influence of LCA preservation surgery and RAL surgery on intraoperative and postoperative complications of rectal cancer resection. Patients who underwent laparoscopic (LSC) or RAL with or without LCA preservation resection for rectal cancer between April 2020 and May 2023 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were categorized into two groups: low ligation (LL) which with preservation of LCA and high ligation (HL) which without preservation of LCA. A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was operative findings, operative morbidity, and postoperative genitourinary function. A total of 612 patients were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 139 patients in each group. The blood loss of the LL group was significantly less than that of the HL group (54.42 ± 12.99 mL vs. 65.71 ± 7.37 mL, p<0.001). The urinary catheter withdrawal time in the LL group was significantly shorter than that in the HL group (4.87 ± 2.04 d vs. 6.06 ± 2.43d, p<0.001). Anastomotic leakage in the LL group was significantly lower than that in HL group (1.44% vs. 7.91%, p = 0.011). The rate of urinary dysfunction and sexual dysfunction in LL group is both significantly lower than HL group. Blood loss and number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) of both RAL subgroups in LL and HL groups were significantly more than that in LSC subgroups. The anastomotic leakage in the RAL subgroup of HL group was significantly lower than that in LSC subgroup (0% vs. 14.89%, p = 0.018). LCA preservation surgery for rectal cancer may help reduce the blood loss, urinary catheter withdrawal time, the rate of anastomotic leakage and ileus, and postoperative genitourinary function outcomes. RAL can reduce the probability of blood loss and improve harvest LNs in patients with rectal cancer.

Non-Thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma as an Adjunct to Intestinal Anastomosis: A Pilot Study on Preventing Anastomotic Leaks

Anastomotic leaks remain a significant challenge in intestinal surgery, often leading to severe complications. This study investigated a novel approach to enhance anastomotic healing and reduce the risk of leaks by combining traditional suturing and stapling techniques with non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma (NTAPP) application. NTAPP, a cold atmospheric plasma generated through the ionization of ambient air, has been shown to possess antimicrobial, hemostatic, and wound-healing properties. NTAPP promotes sterilization, coagulation, and tissue regeneration by generating reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, potentially strengthening anastomotic union. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of NTAPP in three patients undergoing intestinal anastomosis. Following the standard surgical procedure, NTAPP was applied directly to the anastomotic site. Postoperative outcomes were monitored for six months, including anastomotic leaks and healing rates. Preliminary results demonstrated promising outcomes. All three patients exhibited successful sealing of the anastomosis, with no evidence of leakage during the follow-up period, providing reassurance and confidence in the potential of sutures, staples, and NTAPP. These findings suggest that NTAPP can significantly improve the safety and efficacy of intestinal surgeries by reducing the incidence of anastomotic leaks. While further research with a larger sample is necessary to confirm these initial findings, the results of this study provide a strong foundation for exploring the potential of NTAPP as a valuable adjunct to conventional surgical techniques for preventing anastomotic leaks. This innovative approach could reduce postoperative complications, improve patient outcomes, and enhance the overall quality of care in intestinal surgery.

Application of MFI-5 in severe complications and unfavorable outcomes after radical resection of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Frailty is considered a characteristic manifestation of physiological decline in multiple organ systems, which significantly increases the vulnerability of elderly individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. While studies have demonstrated that the 11-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-11) can effectively predict adverse outcomes following radical resection of CRC, there is a lack of research on the applicability of the 5-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) within this patient population.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we examined a cohort of CRC patients aged 65 years and above who had undergone radical resection. For each patient, we calculated their mFI-5 score, considering a score of ≥ 2 as an indication of frailty. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the association between the mFI-5 and adverse outcomes as well as postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Patients with an mFI-5 score ≥ 2 exhibited a significantly higher incidence of serious postoperative complications (53% vs. 30%; P = 0.001) and experienced a longer hospital stay [19.00 (15.00-24.50) vs. 17.00 (14.00-20.00); P < 0.05]. Notably, an mFI-5 score greater than 2 emerged as an independent risk factor for severe postoperative complications (odds ratio: 2.297; 95% confidence interval: 1.216 to 4.339; P = 0.01). Furthermore, the mFI-5 score displayed predictive capabilities for severe postoperative complications with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.629 (95% confidence interval: 0.551 to 0.707; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The mFI-5 demonstrates a high level of sensitivity in predicting serious complications, prolonged hospital stays, and mortality following radical resection of colorectal carcinoma. As a practical clinical assessment tool, the mFI-5 enables the identification of high-risk patients and facilitates preoperative optimization.