Cell Salvage Alters the Systemic Inflammatory Response After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

Autologous cell salvage in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery reduces post-operative complications: a retrospective weighted-matching analysis

OBJECTIVES

Blood transfusion plays a crucial role in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The choice between autologous cell saver (CS) and allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) has been a continuous debate in the medical community, especially within cardiac surgery. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) surgery in patients receiving blood solely via cell salvage compared to those receiving ABT or a combination of ABT and CS perioperatively.

METHODS

A total of 414 patients who underwent isolated OPCAB surgery at our cardiovascular clinic were analyzed. Among them, 250 patients (60.4%) received blood via CS alone, while 164 patients (39.6%) received either ABT or a mix of ABT and CS. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighted (IPTW) matching technique ensured balance in baseline covariates.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in 30-day mortality rates between the CS and ABT groups. The CS group displayed significantly lower rates of overall complications, encompassing stroke, acute kidney injury, atrial fibrillation, and pulmonary complications. Rates of sepsis, readmission, gastrointestinal complications, heparin-induced thrombosis, and deep venous thrombosis were comparable between the two groups. However, in contrast to the ABT group, the CS group exhibited significantly shorter median lengths of hospital stay (LOHS), ICU stay, and ventilation time, along with higher rates of discharge to home rather than acute care facilities.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that autologous blood transfusion via CS results in fewer perioperative complications and faster recovery following OPCAB procedures as compared to ABT.

Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes in adults

BACKGROUND

Organ injury is a common and severe complication of cardiac surgery that contributes to the majority of deaths. There are no effective treatment or prevention strategies. It has been suggested that innate immune system activation may have a causal role in organ injury. A wide range of organ protection interventions targeting the innate immune response have been evaluated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adult cardiac surgery patients, with inconsistent results in terms of effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the review was to summarise the results of RCTs of organ protection interventions targeting the innate immune response in adult cardiac surgery. The review considered whether the interventions had a treatment effect on inflammation, important clinical outcomes, or both.

SEARCH METHODS

CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, conference proceedings and two trial registers were searched on October 2022 together with reference checking to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs comparing organ protection interventions targeting the innate immune response versus placebo or no treatment in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery where the treatment effect on innate immune activation and on clinical outcomes of interest were reported.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Searches, study selection, quality assessment, and data extractions were performed independently by pairs of authors. The primary inflammation outcomes were peak IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations in blood post-surgery. The primary clinical outcome was in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Treatment effects were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed using I2.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 40,255 participants from 328 RCTs were included in the synthesis. The effects of treatments on IL-6 (SMD -0.77, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.58, I2 = 92%) and IL-8 (SMD -0.92, 95% CI -1.20 to -0.65, I2 = 91%) were unclear due to heterogeneity. Heterogeneity for inflammation outcomes persisted across multiple sensitivity and moderator analyses. The pooled treatment effect for in-hospital or 30-day mortality was RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.91, I2 = 0%, suggesting a significant clinical benefit. There was little or no treatment effect on mortality when analyses were restricted to studies at low risk of bias. Post hoc analyses failed to demonstrate consistent treatment effects on inflammation and clinical outcomes. Levels of certainty for pooled treatment effects on the primary outcomes were very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A systematic review of RCTs of organ protection interventions targeting innate immune system activation did not resolve uncertainty as to the effectiveness of these treatments, or the role of innate immunity in organ injury following cardiac surgery.

Benefits of Prehabilitation before Complex Aortic Surgery

The purpose of this narrative review was to detail and discuss the underlying principles and benefits of preoperative interventions addressing risk factors for perioperative adverse events in open aortic surgery (OAS). The term "complex aortic disease" encompasses juxta/pararenal aortic and thoraco-abdominal aneurysms, chronic aortic dissection and occlusive aorto-iliac pathology. Although endovascular surgery has been increasingly favored, OAS remains a durable option, but by necessity involves extensive surgical approaches and aortic cross-clamping and requires a trained multidisciplinary team. The physiological stress of OAS in a fragile and comorbid patient group mandates thoughtful preoperative risk assessment and the implementation of measures dedicated to improving outcomes. Cardiac and pulmonary complications are one of the most frequent adverse events following major OAS and their incidences are correlated to the patient's functional status and previous comorbidities. Prehabilitation should be considered in patients with risk factors for pulmonary complications including advanced age, previous chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure with the aid of pulmonary function tests. It should also be combined with other measures to improve postoperative course and be included in the more general concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Although the current level of evidence regarding the effectiveness of ERAS in the setting of OAS remains low, an increasing body of literature has promoted its implementation in other specialties. Consequently, vascular teams should commit to improving the current evidence through studies to make ERAS the standard of care for OAS.

The effects of differing anticoagulant regimes on blood quality after cell salvage in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cell salvage reduces allogenic blood transfusion requirements in surgery. We present a pilot study exploring the impact of anticoagulant choice, citrate or heparin, on the quality of cell salvaged blood in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Elective on pump CABG patients were randomly allocated to citrate or heparin anticoagulation. We measured red blood cell characteristics and inflammation in both the blood collection reservoir and the washed red blood cell concentrate. Postoperatively, the level of biomarkers and the coagulation profile in the peripheral blood as well as the transfusion requirements of allogenic blood products were studied.

RESULTS

Thirty eight patients were included, 19 in the citrate group and 19 in the heparin group. Baseline characteristics were similar. In the washed red blood cell concentrate, Mean Hb (g/dl) and Ht (%) were lower in the citrate group [Hb: 18.1 g/dL (SD 1.3) vs. 21.1 (1.6), p < 0.001; Ht: 59.9% (54.7-60.9) vs. 63.7% (62.3-64.8); p < 0.001]; Mean corpuscular volume (MCV, μm 3) was higher [99.1fL (9.4) vs. 88 (4.2), p < 0.001] and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC, g/dl) lower in the citrate group [31.9 g/dl (29.6-32.4) vs. 33.6 (33.1-34.0) p < 0.001]. Thrombocyte count (1000/μl) was higher in the citrate group [31.0 (26.0-77.0) vs. 13.0 (10.0-39.0); p = 0.006]. There were no differences in the requirement for allogenic blood products' transfusion (intraoperatively and postoperatively) or in the coagulation parameters after washed red blood cell concentrate infusion. Higher IL-10 was found in the citrate group in the blood collection reservoir, higher neutrophil-derived myeloperoxidase (MPO) in the heparin group after washed red blood cell concentrate infusion.

CONCLUSION

Though red blood cells in washed red blood cell concentrate were more swollen and diluted in the citrate group with more residual thrombocytes, published quality guidelines were met in both groups. Our pilot study suggests that differences in inflammatory markers in the blood collection reservoir and after infusion of washed red blood cell concentrate indicate a possible pro-inflammatory effect of heparin compared to citrate. A larger study is warranted to confirm these results and their possible clinical consequences. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02674906. Registered 5 February 2016.

Intraoperative Cell Savage, Infection and Organ Failure in Infective Endocarditis Patients-A Retrospective Single Center Evaluation

Surgery is indicated in about 50% of infective endocarditis patients, and bleeding or the transfusion of blood a common finding. The intraoperative use of cell salvage may reduce the perioperative transfusion requirement, but its use is limited in the underlying disease. In this retrospective study, we therefore evaluated n = 335 patients fulfilling the modified Duke criteria for infective endocarditis characterized by the use of intraoperative cell salvage with autologous blood retransfusion. Inflammation markers and organ dysfunction, including catecholamine dependency, were evaluated by using linear regression analysis. Between 2015 and 2020, 335 patients underwent surgery for left-sided heart valve endocarditis. Intraoperative cell salvage was used in 40.3% of the cases, especially in complex scenarios and reoperation. Intraoperative cell salvage significantly altered the white blood cell count after surgery. On average, leucocytes were 3.0 Gpt/L higher in patients with intraoperative cell salvage compared to patients without after adjustment for confounders (95% CI: 0.39-5.54). Although the difference in WBC was statistically significant, i.e., higher in the ICS group compared to the no-ICS group, this difference may be clinically unimportant. Organ dysfunction, including hemodynamic instability and lactate values, were comparable between groups. In conclusion, intraoperative cell salvage enhanced the re-transfusion of autologous blood, with minor effects on the postoperative course of inflammatory markers, but was not associated with increased hemodynamic instability or organ dysfunction in general. The restriction of intraoperative cell salvage in surgery for infective endocarditis should be re-evaluated, and more prospective data in this topic are needed.

Cell saver blood transfusions may be associated with a decrease in inflammation and improved outcome measures in pediatric cardiac surgery patients

OBJECTIVE

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a requisite for correction of congenital heart disease by open-heart surgery and induces a systemic inflammatory response that can lead to complications such as acute lung injury and acute kidney injury. In addition, blood transfusions are commonly required for this type of surgery, and they may further exacerbate this inflammatory response and increase morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that, in contrast to red blood cells, intraoperative cell saver (CS) blood transfusions attenuate the post-CPB proinflammatory cytokine response.

METHODS

Serum cytokine concentrations of IL-10, IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α were measured at four time points (preoperatively and postoperatively on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2).

RESULTS

Anti-inflammatory IL-10 levels were significantly lower in the CS group on POD 0 than in the control group (mean 1083.2 pg/mL vs 2080.2 pg/mL, 95%CI 357.4-1636.6, p = .0026). Of the clinical parameters measured, mean BUN and creatinine levels on POD 2 were significantly lower in the CS group (13.79 vs 21.88, p = .004 and 0.45 vs 0.55, p = .055, respectively). In addition, the duration of milrinone use decreased by 80% in the CS group (0.20, 95%CI 0.04, 0.94; p = .048), the median time to extubation in hours was significantly lower in the CS group (3.5 vs 6.5; 95%CI -38.00, -0.50; p = .026), and hospital length of stay was decreased by 60% in the CS group (p = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

CS transfusions in children may lower postoperative anti-inflammatory IL-10 levels, possibly due to an overall decrease in proinflammatory state, and may be associated with improvements in renal and pulmonary functions.

Blood and urinary cytokine balance and renal outcomes at cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Increased perioperative pro-inflammatory biomarkers, renal hypoperfusion and ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) heighten cardiac surgery acute kidney injury (CS-AKI) risk. Increased urinary anti-inflammatory cytokines attenuate risk. We evaluated whether blood and urinary anti-inflammatory biomarkers, when expressed as ratios with biomarkers of inflammation, hypoperfusion and IRI are increased in CS-AKI patients.

METHODS

Preoperative and 24-h postoperative blood and urinary pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, blood VEGF and H-FABP (hypoperfusion biomarkers), and MK, a biomarker for IRI, were measured in 401 cardiac surgery patients. Pre- and postoperative concentrations of biomarkers and selected ratios thereof, were compared between non-CS-AKI and CS-AKI patients.

RESULTS

Compared with non-CS-AKI, blood pro-inflammatory (pre- and post-op TNFα, IP-10, IL-12p40, MIP-1α, NGAL; pre-op IL-6; post-op IL-8, MK) and anti-inflammatory (pre- and post-op sTNFsr1, sTNFsr2, IL-1RA) biomarkers together with urinary pro-inflammatory (pre- and post-op uIL-12p40; post-op uIP-10, uNGAL) and anti-inflammatory (pre- and post-op usTNFsr1, usTNFsr2, uIL-1RA) biomarkers, were significantly higher in CS-AKI patients. Urinary anti-inflammatory biomarkers, when expressed as ratios with biomarkers of inflammation (blood and urine), hypoperfusion (blood H-FABP and VEGF) and IRI (blood MK) were decreased in CS-AKI. In contrast, blood anti-inflammatory biomarkers expressed as similar ratios with blood biomarkers were increased in CS-AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

The urinary anti-inflammatory response may protect against the injurious effects of perioperative inflammation, hypoperfusion and IRI. These finding may have clinical utility in bioprediction and earlier diagnosis of CS-AKI and informing future therapeutic strategies for CS-AKI patients.

Stratifying risk of acute kidney injury in pre and post cardiac surgery patients using a novel biomarker-based algorithm and clinical risk score

Acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery significantly increases morbidity and mortality risks. Improving existing clinical methods of identifying patients at risk of perioperative AKI may advance management and treatment options. This study investigated whether a combination of biomarkers and clinical factors pre and post cardiac surgery could stratify patients at risk of developing AKI. Patients (n = 401) consecutively scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were prospectively studied. Clinical data was recorded and blood samples were tested for 31 biomarkers. Areas under receiver operating characteristic (AUROCs) were generated for biomarkers pre and postoperatively to stratify patients at risk of AKI. Preoperatively sTNFR1 had the highest predictive ability to identify risk of developing AKI postoperatively (AUROC 0.748). Postoperatively a combination of H-FABP, midkine and sTNFR2 had the highest predictive ability to identify AKI risk (AUROC 0.836). Preoperative clinical risk factors included patient age, body mass index and diabetes. Perioperative factors included cardio pulmonary bypass, cross-clamp and operation times, intra-aortic balloon pump, blood products and resternotomy. Combining biomarker risk score (BRS) with clinical risk score (CRS) enabled pre and postoperative assignment of patients to AKI risk categories. Combining BRS with CRS will allow better management of cardiac patients at risk of developing AKI.

The effect of air exposure on leucocyte and cytokine activation in an in-vitro model of cardiotomy suction

Introduction:

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is known to cause a systemic inflammatory and immune response.

Objective:

An in-vitro model of cardiotomy suction was designed to quantify the effects of incrementally increased air-blood exposure on leucocyte marker CD11b and cytokine activation in two common anticoagulants, heparin and citrate.

Methods:

Fresh human blood was exposed to increasing amounts of air flow for ten minutes. Leucocyte and cytokine levels were measured prior to and after ten minutes of air flow. Cytokine levels were also measured after air exposure when incubated for 24 hours at 37oC.

Results:

Leucocyte activation, measured by CD11b, was elevated between baseline and air flow rates up to 50 mL/min. After 10 minutes of air exposure, no measured cytokine levels were elevated. After 24 hours of incubation, cytokine levels of TNFα, IL-10, IL-6, and IL-8 were elevated. However, only IL-8 was significantly elevated in citrated blood, but not in heparinized blood, when compared to baseline samples that were also incubated for 24 hours.

Conclusion:

This study investigates CD11b levels in response to an air stimulus in blood that was anticoagulated with citrate or heparin. Exposure to an air stimulus activates leucocytes. Activation of CD11b was less when using heparin as an anticoagulant compared to citrate. Cytokine activation occurs with air stimulation, but levels do not immediately rise, indicating that time is required to generate free cytokines.

Shed-blood-separation and cell-saver: an integral Part of MiECC? Shed-blood-separation and its influence on the perioperative inflammatory response during coronary revascularization with minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation systems – a randomized controlled trial

Objective:

The postoperative systemic inflammatory response after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still an undesirable side-effect after cardiac surgery. It is most likely caused by blood contact with foreign surfaces and by the surgical trauma itself. However, the recirculation of activated shed mediastinal blood is another main cause of blood cell activation and cytokine release. Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) comprises a completely closed circuit, coated surfaces and the separation of suction blood. We hypothesized that MiECC, with separated cell saved blood, would induce less of a systemic inflammatory response than MiECC with no cell-saver. The aim of this study was, therefore, to investigate the impact of cell washing shed blood from the operating field versus direct return to the ECC on the biomarkers for systemic inflammation.

Material and methods:

In the study, patients with MiECC and cell-saver were compared with the control group, patients with MiECC and direct re-transfusion of the drawn blood shed from the surgical field.

Results:

High amounts of TNF-α (+ 120% compared to serum blood) were found in the shed blood itself, but a significant reduction was demonstrated with the use of a cell-saver (TNF-α ng/l post-ECC 10 min: 9.5±3.5 vs. 19.7±14.5, p<0.0001). The values for procalcitonin were not significantly increased in the control group (6h: 1.07±3.4 vs. 2.15±9.55, p=0.19) and lower for C-reactive protein (CRP) (24h: 147.1±64.0 vs.134.4±52.4 p=0.28).

Conclusion:

The use of a cell-saver and the processing of shed blood as an integral part of MiECC significantly reduces the systemic cytokine load. We, therefore, recommend the integration of cell-saving devices in MiECC to reduce the perioperative inflammatory response.

Efficacy of intraoperative cell salvage in decreasing perioperative blood transfusion rates in first-time cardiac surgery patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) in transfusion reduction during cardiac surgery remains conflicting. We sought to evaluate the impact of routine ICS on outcomes following cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent nonemergent, first-time cardiac surgery 18 months before and 18 months after the implementation of routine ICS. Perioperative transfusion rates, postoperative bleeding, clinical and hematological outcomes, and overall cost were examined. We used multivariable logistic regression modelling to determine the risk-adjusted effect of ICS on likelihood of perioperative transfusion.

RESULTS

A total of 389 patients formed the final study population (186 undergoing ICS and 203 controls). Patients undergoing ICS had significantly lower perioperative transfusion rates of packed red blood cells (pRBCs; 33.9% v. 45.3% p = 0.021), coagulation products (16.7% v. 32.5% p < 0.001) and any blood product (38.2% v. 52.7%, p = 0.004). Patients receiving ICS had decreased mediastinal drainage at 12 h (mean 320 [range 230-550] mL v. mean 400 [range 260-690] mL, p = 0.011) and increased postoperative hemoglobin (mean 104.7 ± 13.2 g/L v. 95.0 ± 11.9 g/L, p < 0.001). Following adjustment for other baseline and intraoperative covariates, ICS emerged as an independent predictor of lower perioperative transfusion rates of pRBCs (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.87), coagulation products (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.71) and any blood product (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.77). Additionally, ICS was associated with a cost benefit of $116 per patient.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative cell salvage could represent a clinically cost-effective way of reducing transfusion rates in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Further research on systematic ICS is required before recommending it for routine use.

Intraoperative cell salvage during cardiac surgery is associated with reduced postoperative lung injury

OBJECTIVES

In addition to its blood-sparing effects, intraoperative cell salvage may reduce lung injury following cardiac surgery by removing cytokines, neutrophilic proteases and lipids that are present in cardiotomy suction blood. To test this hypothesis, we performed serial measurements of biomarkers of the integrity of the alveolar-capillary membrane, leucocyte activation and general inflammation. We assessed lung injury clinically by the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation and the alveolar arterial oxygen gradient.

METHODS

Serial measurements of systemic plasma concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), myeloperoxidase, elastase, surfactant protein D (SP-D), Clara cell 16 kD protein (CC16) and soluble receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (sRAGEs) were performed on blood samples from 195 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with the use of a cell salvage (CS) device (CS, n = 99) or without (CONTROL, n = 96).

RESULTS

Postoperative mechanical ventilation time was shorter in the CS group than in the CONTROL group [10 (8-15) vs 12 (9-18) h, respectively, P = 0.047]. The postoperative alveolar arterial oxygen gradient, however, was not different between groups. After surgery, the lung injury biomarkers CC16 and sRAGEs were lower in the CS group than in the CONTROL group. Biomarkers of systemic inflammation (IL-6, myeloperoxidase and elastase) were also lower in the CS group. Finally, mechanical ventilation time correlated with CC16 plasma concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The intraoperative use of a cell salvage device resulted in less lung injury in patients after cardiac surgery as assessed by lower concentrations of lung injury markers and shorter mechanical ventilation times.

Off-pump CABG surgery reduces systemic inflammation compared with on-pump surgery but does not change systemic endothelial responses: a prospective randomized study

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery can result in severe postoperative organ failure. During CABG surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with cardiac arrest is often used (on-pump CABG), which often results in a systemic inflammatory response. To reduce this inflammatory response, off-pump CABG was reintroduced, thereby avoiding CPB. There is increasing evidence that the endothelium plays an important role in the pathophysiology of organ failure after CABG surgery. In this study, 60 patients who were scheduled for elective CABG surgery were randomized to have surgery for on-pump or off-pump CABG. Blood was collected at four time points: start, end, 6 h, and 24 h postoperatively. Levels of inflammatory cytokines, soluble adhesion molecules, and angiogenic factors and their receptors were measured in the plasma. No differences were found in preoperative characteristics between the patient groups. The levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin 10, and myeloperoxidase, but not interleukin 6, were increased to a greater extent in the on-pump CABG compared with off-pump CABG after sternum closure. The soluble endothelial adhesion molecules E-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and intracellular adhesion molecule 1 were not elevated in the plasma during and after CABG surgery in both on-pump and off-pump CABG. Angiopoietin 2 was only increased 24 h after surgery in both on-pump and off-pump CABG. Higher levels of sFlt-1 were found after sternum closure in off-pump CABG compared with on-pump CABG. Avoiding CPB and aortic cross clamping in CABG surgery reduces the systemic inflammatory response. On-pump CABG does not lead to an increased release of soluble endothelial adhesion molecules in the circulation compared with off-pump CABG.

Impact of intraoperatively salvaged and washed blood on stimulated cytokine release in vitro

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative blood salvage and processing it with commercially available devices is a widespread standard procedure to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of such processed blood on the immune system by measuring pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Salvaged blood from 20 patients undergoing hip arthroplasty was processed with a continuous autotransfusion system. One part of the processed blood was left without further treatment, one part was additionally leukoreduced, one part was irradiated, and one part was separated into its cellular and soluble fraction by centrifugation. Specimens from each part were mixed in vitro with venous blood from the patient in ratios of 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3 and incubated with endotoxin for 24 hours. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-10 were measured in cell culture supernatants by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

All parts of the salvaged blood were without a significant influence on TNF-α release. In contrast, IL-10 was significantly increased, independently of the admixtured salvaged blood being plain, additionally irradiated, or additionally leukoreduced. This IL-10 increase was also found with the cellular fraction of the plain salvaged blood, whereas the soluble fraction had no influence on IL-10 release.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative salvaged blood is not immunologically inert. We observed a significant increase in the anti-inflammatory IL-10 response without affecting the proinflammatory TNF-α release. Neither leukofiltration nor gamma irradiation eliminated this effect that was limited only to the cellular fraction of the salvaged blood, suggesting red blood cells to be responsible for the observed immunomodulation.

Does use of cell saver decrease the inflammatory response in cardiac surgery?

BACKGROUND

The role of a cell-saver device in the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery has not been well documented. We hypothesized that the use of a cell saver may reduce proinflammatory cytokine concentrations in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

57 patients presenting for first-time nonemergency cardiac surgery were prospectively randomized to control or cell salvage groups. Blood samples for inflammatory marker assays were collected from the arterial line on induction of anesthesia, at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, 1 h after surgery, and 24 h after surgery. Plasma proinflammatory cytokines were analyzed using a sandwich solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

The highest cytokine levels were observed 1 h after surgery. When comparing serum interleukin levels in both patient groups during the different perioperative periods, we found a higher interleukin-8 concentration 24 h after the procedure, and higher concentrations of the p40 subunit of interleukin-12 at 1 h and 24 h postoperatively. The concentrations of interleukin-6 and p40 were greater in blood stored by the cardiotomy suction system than in blood processed by the cell saver (p = 0.01 in both cases). The interleukin-8 concentration was higher in the blood processed by the cell saver (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in interleukin-1 and interferon gamma levels in blood from both systems. Clinical outcomes were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that cell salvage in low-risk patients undergoing their first elective cardiac procedure does not decrease the inflammatory response after surgery.

Consensus statement: minimal criteria for reporting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass

The lack of established cause and effect between putative mediators of inflammation and adverse clinical outcomes has been responsible for many failed anti-inflammatory interventions in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Candidate interventions that impress in preclinical trials by suppressing a given inflammation marker might fail at the clinical trial stage because the marker of interest is not linked causally to an adverse outcome. Alternatively, there exist examples in which pharmaceutical agents or other interventions improve clinical outcomes but for which we are uncertain of any antiinflammatory mechanism. The Outcomes consensus panel made 3 recommendations in 2009 for the conduct of clinical trials focused on the systemic inflammatory response. This panel was tasked with updating, as well as simplifying, a previous consensus statement. The present recommendations for investigators are the following: (1) Measure at least 1 inflammation marker, defined in broad terms; (2) measure at least 1clinical end point, drawn from a list of practical yet clinically meaningful end points suggested by the consensus panel; and(3) report a core set of CPB and perfusion criteria that maybe linked to outcomes. Our collective belief is that adhering to these simple consensus recommendations will help define the influence of CPB practice on the systemic inflammatory response, advance our understanding of causal inflammatory mechanisms, and standardize the reporting of research findings in the peer-reviewed literature.

The efficacy of an intraoperative cell saver during cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Cell salvage may be used during cardiac surgery to avoid allogeneic blood transfusion. It has also been claimed to improve patient outcomes by removing debris from shed blood, which may increase the risk of stroke or neurocognitive dysfunction. In this study, we sought to determine the overall safety and efficacy of cell salvage in cardiac surgery by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify all randomized trials of cell saver use during cardiac surgery. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and abstract databases were searched up to November 2008. All randomized trials comparing cell saver use and no cell saver use in cardiac surgery and reporting at least one predefined clinical outcome were included. The random effects model was used to calculate the odds ratios (OR, 95% confidence intervals [CI]) and the weighted mean differences (WMD, 95% CI) for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-one randomized trials involving 2282 patients were included in the meta-analysis. During cardiac surgery, the use of an intraoperative cell saver reduced the rate of exposure to any allogeneic blood product (OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43-0.94, P = 0.02) and red blood cells (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.92, P = 0.02) and decreased the mean volume of total allogeneic blood products transfused per patient (WMD -256 mL, 95% CI: -416 to -95 mL, P = 0.002). There was no difference in hospital mortality (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.25-1.68, P = 0.37), postoperative stroke or transient ischemia attack (OR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.20-1.76, P = 0.34), atrial fibrillation (OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.69-1.23, P = 0.56), renal dysfunction (OR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.41-1.80, P = 0.70), infection (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.75-2.10, P = 0.39), patients requiring fresh frozen plasma (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.82-1.66, P = 0.40), and patients requiring platelet transfusions (OR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.63-1.28, P = 0.55) between cell saver and noncell saver groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that the use of a cell saver reduces exposure to allogeneic blood products or red blood cell transfusion for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Subanalyses suggest that a cell saver may be beneficial only when it is used for shed blood and/or residual blood or during the entire operative period. Processing cardiotomy suction blood with a cell saver only during cardiopulmonary bypass has no significant effect on blood conservation and increases fresh frozen plasma transfusion.