Definitive Therapy for Isolated Esophageal Metastases Prolongs Survival

Treatment of Oligometastatic GI Cancers

Oligometastatic state is believed to potentially represent a transitional stage between early, locoregional state disease and widely metastatic disease. Historically, locoregional approaches, particularly in advanced colorectal cancers, have demonstrated efficacy in select patients with limited burden of metastatic disease. Recent strides in systemic therapies, including biomarker-based treatments and immunotherapy, alongside innovations in surgical techniques and novel locoregional approaches such as stereotactic radiotherapy and ablation, have ushered in a new era of therapeutic possibilities across all oligometastatic GI cancers. Despite these advancements, there remains a significant gap in high-quality prospective evidence guiding patient selection and treatment decisions across various disease types. Ongoing clinical trials are anticipated to provide crucial insights into oligometastatic states, fostering the refinement of disease-specific oligometastatic state definitions and treatment algorithms. This article reviews existing data on the management of oligometastatic GI cancer, summarizes current state of knowledge for each disease state, and provides updates on ongoing studies in this space.

Radiotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: from Palliation to Curation

OPINION STATEMENT

Esophageal cancer is a global health problem, which is 7th most common and 6th most deadly cancer. It has been the era of immuno-oncology for esophageal cancer management. Radiation therapy has been one of the key local therapeutic approaches for esophageal cancer treatment, while its role in advanced disease is challenging and debatable. There have been emerging clinical and translational studies of radiation therapy in recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer. Immunotherapy has been established the standard care of 1st and 2nd line systemic therapies of advanced esophageal cancer, and the development of tumor immunity has opened a new chapter for the esophageal cancer radiation therapy. The current review will summarize the classic radiation therapy research in advanced esophageal cancer, as well as the most recent key findings. The subtitles will cover palliative radiotherapy for dysphagia, re-radiation for recurrent disease, oligo-focal disease management and stereotactic radiation therapy, and radiotherapy with immunotherapy. Radiotherapy plays vital role in multidisciplinary management of advanced EC. External or intratumoral irradiation has been used for palliation of dysphagia and improving QOL in esophageal cancer patients traditionally, while recent clinical and technical advance enables radiotherapy to be considered in recurrent or metastatic disease for curation attention. Novel clinical and translational investigation is opening a new chapter of radiotherapy with immunotherapy for benefiting advanced EC patients.

Safety and Efficacy of Computed Tomography-Guided Iodine-125 Brachytherapy as a Salvage Treatment for Locoregional Lymph Node Recurrence of Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) brachytherapy as a salvage treatment for esophageal cancer with locoregional lymph node recurrence (LNR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with esophageal cancer who developed locoregional LNR after initial curative resection followed by CT-guided ¹²⁵I brachytherapy as a salvage treatment (January 2014 to January 2020). Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, v1.1. Clinical response was evaluated with the Numerical Rating Scale pain score, and adverse events were evaluated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). A layered Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine independent factors affecting LTPFS.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients (mean age, 60 years) were included in this study. The median follow-up was 9.3 months (range, 4.3-12 months). The median LTPFS was 7.0 months (interquartile range, 5.0-9.5 months). The local control rates were 100%, 94.2%, 59.6%, and 13.4% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The overall survival rates were 100%, 100%, 82.6%, and 36.5% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The number of locoregional LNRs (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.11-5.10]; P = .026), clinical stage at diagnosis (HR, 8.12 [95% CI, 3.19-20.66]; P < .001), and pathologic stage (HR, 5.74 [95% CI, 2.14-15.39]; P = .001) were independent factors for LTPFS. The rate of pain relief was 96.4% (27 of 28). Treatment-related death was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-guided ¹²⁵I radioactive seed implantation resulted in pain relief and short to midterm local control.

Definition of oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer and impact of local oligometastasis-directed treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Local treatment (metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy) for oligometastatic disease (OMD) in patients with esophagogastric cancer may improve overall survival (OS). The primary aim was to identify definitions of esophagogastric OMD. A secondary aim was to perform a meta-analysis of OS after local treatment versus systemic therapy alone for OMD.

METHODS

Studies and study protocols reporting on definitions or OS after local treatment for esophagogastric OMD were included. The primary outcome was the maximum number of organs/lesions considered OMD and the maximum number of lesions per organ (i.e. 'organ-specific' OMD burden). Agreement was considered to be either absent/poor (< 50%), fair (50%-75%), or consensus (≥ 75%). The secondary outcome was the pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for OS after local treatment versus systemic therapy alone. The ROBINS tool was used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 97 studies, including 7 study protocols, and 2 prospective studies, were included. OMD was considered in 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases (consensus). 'Organ-specific' OMD burden could involve bilobar ≤ 3 liver metastases, unilateral ≤ 2 lung metastases, 1 extra-regional lymph node station, ≤ 2 brain metastases, or bilateral adrenal gland metastases (consensus). Local treatment for OMD was associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone based on 6 non-randomized studies (pooled aHR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30-0.74) and for liver oligometastases based on 5 non-randomized studies (pooled aHR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.59). All studies scored serious risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature considers esophagogastric cancer spread limited to 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases or 1 extra-regional lymph node station to be OMD. Local treatment for OMD appeared associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone. Prospective randomized trials are warranted.

Oligometastases After Curative Esophagectomy Are Not One Size Fits All

BACKGROUND

More than one-half of patients treated with esophagectomy for esophageal cancer experience recurrence. Oligometastasis, a proposed intermediate state of isolated local or solid organ recurrence that occurs before widespread systemic disease, is a potential target for aggressive local intervention. This study investigated presentation and prognosis among solid organ recurrence sites.

METHODS

Patients with isolated solid organ recurrence at the liver, lung, or brain who underwent R0 esophagectomy from 1995 to 2016 were identified. Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes were compared among sites of recurrence. Overall survival was quantified using the Kaplan-Meier approach and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

In total, 104 patients were included (site: brain, 37; lung, 27; liver, 40). Eighty percent of liver, 51% of brain, and 44% of lung oligometastases occurred in the first 12 months after esophagectomy. Despite the limited use of aggressive therapy, patients with lung oligometastasis had significantly longer median overall survival (2.41 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58 to 3.31) than did patients with brain (0.95 years; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.49) or liver (0.95 years; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.41) oligometastasis (P < .001). This difference remained after patient and tumor characteristics were adjusted for (brain: hazard ratio, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.24 to 8.99; liver: hazard ratio, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.48 to 5.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Presentations and prognoses differ by site of esophageal cancer recurrence. Lung oligometastases are associated with a more indolent course, and patients with these lesions may benefit from more aggressive treatment to improve their more favorable outcomes further. These differences by site of recurrence advocate for moving beyond a standardized palliative approach to all esophageal cancer recurrences.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Oligometastases from Esophageal Cancer and Long-Term Outcomes of Resection

BACKGROUND

Recurrent esophageal cancer after radical therapy usually is thought to be incurable and treated with palliative-intent systemic therapy. However, it is empirically known that surgical resection may be effective for selected patients, although no consensus exists on the efficacy of surgery for recurrent esophageal cancer. This study sought to identify a group of patients for whom surgical resection is considered effective.

METHODS

The study enrolled 206 patients at a single center who had recurrence after radical therapy for esophageal cancer. Prognostic factors after recurrence were identified, and efficacy of surgery was analyzed according to whether the recurrent lesions were oligometastases (i.e., ≤ 5 lesions in a single domain) or not.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis, oligometastatic presentation was the only factor associated with survival after recurrence (hazard ratio 6.29; 95% confidence interval, 4.10-9.71). The actuarial survival rates for the patients with oligometastases were 59.5% at 3 years and 51.7% at 5 years. The survival rates at 3 and 5 years were significantly higher for the patients who underwent resection (64.3% and 55.6%, respectively) than for those who did not (both 100%) and for the patients with multiple metastases (9.8% and 0%, respectively). The survival rates for the patients who had oligometastases without resection were comparably lower than for the patients with multiple metastases.

CONCLUSION

Oligometastatic presentation at recurrence was associated with better survival outcomes for the patients who experienced recurrence after radical treatment for esophageal cancer, and surgical resection could be a choice of treatment for this group of patients.

Total FDG lesion number on PET/CT predicts survival of esophageal carcinoma patients with recurrence following curative surgery

BACKGROUND

Total lesion number is a prognostic determinant in recurrent esophageal cancer, but this requires multiple tests. Here, we investigated the prognostic value of total FDG lesion number obtained from a single PET/CT study.

METHODS

Subjects were 153 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with loco-regional or distant recurrence following curative surgery. FDG PET/CT performed within 30 days was inspected for abnormal FDG uptake lesions using a SUVmax of 3.0 as threshold for significance. Prognostic associations were assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

PET/CT showed significant local FDG lesions in 49.0%, regional lesions in 78.4%, and distant lesions in 44.4% of patients. Among 73 patients with loco-regional recurrence, 54 had 0-3 and 19 had ≥4 FDG lesions. Among 80 patients with distant recurrence, 31 had 0-3 and 49 had ≥4 FDG lesions. During a median follow-up of 11.8 months, 99 deaths occurred. Univariate variables associated with poor survival included ≥4 FDG lesions and no treatment for loco-regional recurrence and no treatment for distant recurrence. Kaplan Meier analysis showed worse survival for ≥4 than 0-3 FDG lesions in patients with loco-regional recurrence (15.6 vs. 32.1 months; P=0.009), but not in those with distant recurrence. Significant independent predictors of poor survival were ≥4 FDG lesions and no treatment for loco-regional recurrence and no treatment for distant recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Total FDG lesion number assessed by PET/CT is a significant independent prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients with loco-regional recurrence following curative surgery.

Predictors of Survival After Treatment of Oligometastases After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Recurrent esophageal carcinoma (EC) has a dismal prognosis. However, prior studies showed that selected patients with isolated recurrence may benefit from definitive therapy. The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of postrecurrence survival (PRS) in patients with isolated EC recurrence who were treated with curative intent.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective database (1988 to 2015) was performed to identify all recurrent EC patients after curative esophagectomy. Demographic and clinicopathologic data were reviewed. The probability of PRS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of PRS after definitive therapy for isolated EC recurrence were determined by the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 640 curative esophagectomies, 241 patients (37.7%) experienced recurrences (median follow-up 50 months). Fifty-six patients (9%) received definitive treatment of isolated EC recurrence (31 were treated surgically with or without chemotherapy-radiotherapy [CTRT] and 25 received definitive CTRT alone). Median time to recurrence (TTR) was 19 months. The 1- and 3-year PRSs were 78% and 38% (median survival 26 months). On multivariable analysis; TTR was the only significant independent predictor for survival after recurrence (hazards ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.96 to 0.99, p = 0.034). No pronounced difference was found in disease-free survival or in PRS between recurrent patients treated with operation with or without CTRT and patients who received definitive CTRT.

CONCLUSIONS

A select subgroup of patients with isolated EC recurrence can be treated with curative intent. TTR was the best predictor for PRS.

Locally advanced esophageal cancer: What becomes of 5-year survivors?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term outcomes of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) who underwent esophagectomy and survived at least 5 years, and the predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) beyond 5 years.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of a prospective database to identify patients with clinical stage T2N0M0 or higher LAEC. Medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics, as well as data on recurrence and survival. Multivariable analysis of predictors of DFS beyond 5 years was performed using a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Between 1988 and 2009, 355 of 500 patients underwent esophagectomy for cT2N0M0 or higher disease. Of these 355 patients, 126 were alive and disease-free at the 5-year follow-up, for an actuarial 5-year DFS of 33%. Recurrent esophageal cancer developed in 8 patients after 5 years. Among the 126 surviving patients, the actuarial overall survival was 94% at 7 years and 80% at 10 years. On multivariable analysis, the sole significant predictor of DFS after the 5-year time point was non-en bloc resection at the original operation (P = .006). Pulmonary-related deaths accounted for 10 out of 22 noncancer deaths. A second primary cancer developed in 23 of the 126 surviving patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged survival can be obtained in one-third of patients with LAEC. An en bloc resection at the original operation is the most significant predictor of prolonged survival. Survivors experience a high rate of second primary cancer and an apparently high rate of deaths from pulmonary disease. Careful follow-up is necessary for these patients, even after the 5-year mark.

Isolated non-hepatic metastasis from upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma: A case for surgical resection

INTRODUCTION

Upper Gastrointestinal Tract (UGIT) malignancy is an increasing problem in western society and its prognosis is generally poor. The prognosis dims even further with the presence of loco regional recurrences or distant metastasis. This article looks at the feasibility and potential benefit from resection of non-hepatic, non-nodal metastases and recurrences.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Case 1. A 72-year-old male who underwent total gastrectomy for a gastric adenocarcinoma presented with a splenic mass 40 months later and underwent a splenectomy. He is disease free at 30 months post-metastectomy. Case 2. A 54-year-old male with oesophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma, underwent an Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy. He developed a distal pancreatic mass at 24 months follow-up and underwent distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. He is disease free at 12 months post-metastectomy. Case 3. A 75-year-old male underwent subtotal gastrectomy for lesser curvature adenocarcinoma. At 42 months follow-up, he developed solitary abdominal wall recurrence. This was locally resected with clear margins. After 12 months, he developed another full thickness abdominal wall recurrence with involvement of the hepatic flexure. Enbloc resection including right hemicolectomy was performed and he is disease free at 3 months.

DISCUSSION

There is very scarce literature on resection of non-hepatic, non-nodal recurrences/distant metastasis in oesophagogastric cancers. Based on these cases, a surgical resection in selected cases may provide prolonged survival with good quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Resection for isolated recurrences and metachronous metastasis from UGIT cancers may be worthwhile, especially if patients have minimal co-morbidities.