Surgical Treatment for Limited-Stage Primary Small Cell Cancer of the Esophagus

Analysis of the Clinicopathological Characteristics, Prognosis, and Lymphocyte Infiltration of Esophageal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Surgery-Based Cohort and Propensity-Score Matching Study

Background: Esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (E-NENs) are a rare and poorly reported subtype of esophageal carcinoma. We analyzed the differences in clinicopathological features, prognosis, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) between E-NENs and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: A total of 3620 patients who underwent esophagectomy were enrolled retrospectively. The study cohort was divided into two groups (E-NENs and ESCC) through propensity-score matching, and the prognosis and TILs were compared between the two groups. The TILs were assessed using tumor specimens (including six cases of ESCC, six cases of neuroendocrine carcinomas [NECs], and six cases of mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms [MiNENs]). Results: E-NENs accounted for 3.0% (107/3620) of cases, among which there were just 3 neuroendocrine tumor cases, 51 NEC cases, and 53 MiNENs cases. After matching, esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas (E-NECs) showed both poorer 5-year overall survival (OS; 35.4% vs. 54.8%, p = 0.0019) and recurrence-free survival (RFS; 29.3% vs. 48.9%, p < 0.001) compared with ESCC. However, the differences were not prominent in the subgroup with stage I. No significant survival benefit was observed for E-NECs with multimodal therapy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that E-NECs are an independent risk factor for OS and RFS. In the exploratory analysis, E-NECs were associated with less infiltration of immune cells compared with ESCC. Conclusion: E-NECs are significantly associated with a poorer prognosis than ESCC except for early-stage disease. The fewer TILs within the tumor microenvironment of E-NECs compared with ESCC results in weaker anti-tumor immunity and may lead to a poorer prognosis.

The Survival and Prognosis Characteristics of Primary Esophageal Small-Cell Carcinoma

Objective

To comprehensively explore the survival characteristics of primary esophageal small-cell carcinoma (PSCCE) and identify the main factors affecting the prognosis.

Methods

The clinical and follow-up data of PSCCE patients admitted to the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2006 to 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was five-year survival. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test was used to compare the differences in survival rates among the groups. Cox regression models were used to analyze prognostic factors.

Results

A total of 119 eligible patients were retrieved. Median survival was 27 months (3-100 months). Changes in overall survival (OS) in PSCCE patients were associated with TNM stage (P = 0.007), T stage (P = 0.049), and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.004). When TNM was in stage I-IIb, lymph node metastasis (P = 0.003) or combined adjuvant therapy (P = 0.004) was an independent factor affecting OS. Survival analysis showed that TNM staging had no predictive value for 5-year survival time or disease-free survival (DFS) of PSCCE (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

TNM stage, T stage, and lymph node metastasis were related to the survival of patients. Negative lymph node metastasis and treatment are independent prognostic factors in PSCCE TNM stage I-IIb patients.

Clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival trends in esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is an extremely rare type of malignancy. Clinical data of ENEC are limited to case reports and case series. More information is needed on its clinical feature, management, and prognosis.

METHODS

This study collected information of ENEC patients diagnosed pathologically from 2010 to 2018. Data including demographic information, clinical features, and survival trends were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA/SE 15.1, SPSS 25.0, and GraphPad Prism 8.

RESULTS

A total of 283 ENEC patients were included in this study. The small-cell and large-cell subtypes of ENEC possess similar clinical features. The lower third of the esophagus (58%) was the most common location of ENEC. At the time of diagnosis, most ENEC patients were AJCC 7th stage IV (48.1%). Metastasis occurred in more than half of the ENEC patients (53.4%), and the most common metastatic site was the liver (37.1%). Compared with poorly differentiated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), another aggressive malignancy of the esophagus sometimes confused with ENEC because of similar histological features, our study showed differences in tumor location and metastatic rate, but similar poor survival rates. Multivariate survival analysis showed that ENEC located at the middle third of esophagus (p = 0.013), "Brain metastasis" (p = 0.019), and "Liver metastasis" (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of worse outcomes. "Surgery" (p = 0.003), and "Chemotherapy" (p < 0.001) were associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of patients with newly diagnosed ENEC presented with metastatic disease. Predictors of poor survival included tumor location, brain metastasis, and liver metastasis. ENEC and poorly differentiated ESCC share certain histological features, but differ in tumor location and metastatic rate. Yet, no standard treatment strategy has been established, but surgery and chemotherapy were related to better outcomes.

Clinicopathological analysis of 67 cases of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy on prognosis

The clinicopathological properties of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) and its optimal therapy have not been widely studied, as the disease is not common. Consequently, we conducted a retrospective study to analyze the clinical features as well as the prognosis of patients with surgically resected ENEC.The clinicopathological data of patients with ENEC who underwent esophagostomy with regional lymphadenectomy at Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Jiangsu Provincial Tumor Hospital starting January 2008 until December 2014 were collected.Ninety-two cases of ENEC were part of this study. However, only 67 patients were analyzed and followed up. A univariate model for the Cox proportional hazards revealed that prognosis was associated with postoperative adjuvant therapy, age, and lymph node metastasis (P < .05); a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that postoperative adjuvant therapy was a significant independent prognostic factor. Postoperative adjuvant therapy directly affected overall survival, with a significant disparity noted between the groups (P = .022). In this study, patients who received adjuvant therapy had an average time of survival of 39 months (interquartile range: 27.068-50.932 months), while those who did not receive adjuvant therapy had an average survival time of 13 months (interquartile range: 10.129-15.871 months). The survival time was longer in the treated group than in the untreated group (hazard ratio = 0.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.94; P = .034).ENEC is a heterogeneous tumor with a very poor prognosis. Combining surgery with adjuvant and/or chemotherapy significantly prolongs the survival of patients, and the optimal treatment for ENEC should be determined with future prospective studies.

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram model for Chinese patients with primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCE) is a highly invasive malignant tumor with a poor prognosis compared with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Due to the limited samples size and the short follow-up time, there are few reports on elucidating the prognosis of PSCE, especially on the establishment and validation of a survival prediction nomogram model covering general information, pathological factors and specific biological proteins of PSCE patients.

AIM

To establish an effective nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) probability for PSCE patients in China.

METHODS

The nomogram was based on a retrospective study of 256 PSCE patients. Univariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to examine the prognostic factors associated with PSCE, and establish the model for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS based on the Akaike information criterion. Discrimination and validation were assessed by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). Histology type, age, tumor invasion depth, lymph node invasion, detectable metastasis, chromogranin A, and neuronal cell adhesion molecule 56 were integrated into the model.

RESULTS

The C-index was prognostically superior to the 7^th tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging in the primary cohort [0.659 (95%CI: 0.607-0.712) vs 0.591 (95%CI: 0.517-0.666), P = 0.033] and in the validation cohort [0.700 (95%CI: 0.622-0.778) vs 0.605 (95%CI: 0.490-0.721), P = 0.041]. Good calibration curves were observed for the prediction probabilities of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in both cohorts. DCA analysis showed that our nomogram model had a higher overall net benefit compared to the 7^th TNM staging .

CONCLUSION

Our nomogram can be used to predict the survival probability of PSCE patients, which can help clinicians to make individualized survival predictions.

Preoperative chemotherapy for limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment approach for limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus remains uncertain, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery versus upfront surgery in those patients.

METHODS

From June 2001 to June 2015, a total of 280 patients with limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus were screened from 60 131 esophageal cancer patients. The outcome analysis of those patients who receiving preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery or upfront surgery were conducted. The primary endpoint was overall survival and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety.

RESULTS

Out of the 280 patients, 200 were men (71.4%), the median age was 64 years (range,42-75 years), 171 patients (61.1%) patients received preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery, and 109 patients (38.9%) underwent upfront surgery. A pathologic complete response rate of 8.8% was noted in patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. Compared to the upfront surgery group, the preoperative chemotherapy group had a better median overall survival (26.0 months vs. 19.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.92; P = 0.011) and a prolonged progression-free survival (16.0 months vs. 13.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99; P = 0.039). Postoperative complications and peritreatment mortality were comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to upfront surgery, preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery improves overall survival in patients with limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Background

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE) is a rare and aggressive malignancy. It has a poor survival rate, and there is no consensus as to a standard therapeutic modality. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and evaluate the outcomes of patients with PSCCE who had been treated with different therapeutic methods.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 113 consecutive patients with PSCCE who received treatment at our center from 2003 to 2016. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The Cox regression model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. The survival analysis was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods.

Results

The 12- and 36-month OS rates of all 113 enrolled patients were 45% and 12%, respectively. A significantly prolonged OS rate was associated with lymph node stages N0–N1 (P=0.022), the Veterans’ Administration Lung Study Group (VALSG) system limited-disease (LD) staging (P=0.040), and multimodality treatments (P=0.047). Patients with regional lymph node metastasis benefited more from surgery combined with chemotherapy than surgery or chemotherapy alone (P=0.046). Concerning chemotherapy, cisplatin plus etoposide was the regimen most commonly used to treat PSCCE patients (67.5%).

Conclusions

An early lymph node stage, the VALSG LD staging, and multimodality treatments were identified as independent prognostic factors of PSCCE. Surgery combined with adjuvant chemotherapy was especially necessary for LD stage PSCCE patients with lymph node stages N1–3.

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: progression in the last decade

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE) is a highly malignant tumor that is diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy and immunohistochemistry. Because of its low incidence, a high degree of malignancy, and rapid progress, it is difficult to conduct large, randomized controlled trials and to establish a standard treatment plan for this disease. In recent years, several retrospective studies have been reported, and with the rise of emerging therapies, PSCCE has gradually become a focus of thoracic surgery. This paper reviews progress in the diagnosis and treatment of PSCCE in recent years.

Treatment strategies for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the upper digestive tract

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the esophagus and the stomach is aggressive. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

Both clinicopathological factors and treatment results were examined in 34 patients with immunohistochemically diagnosed NEC of the upper gastrointestinal tract (esophagus 22; stomach 12).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine tumors showed protruding and localized type, like submucosal tumor. Esophagectomy and gastrectomy were performed in six and eight patients, respectively. Among the six patients with esophageal NEC, three with node metastasis developed recurrence within seven months, while the other three (pT1bN0) had no recurrence. Regarding gastric NEC, three patients with pT3N1 or 2 tumor received adjuvant chemotherapy and achieved a 5-year survival. However, the other five experienced recurrence after gastrectomy. Systemic chemotherapy was performed as the main treatment for 18 patients with advanced NEC. The median survival was 10 months after initial chemotherapy. No marked differences in the response were recognized between the 14 cases with esophageal NEC and the 4 with gastric NEC. The median survival was 14.3 and 5.3 months for the 11 effective and 7 non-effective patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A macroscopically unique appearance, like submucosal tumor, suggests the possibility of NEC. Esophagectomy is an effective treatment option for limited-stage NEC without node metastasis, while gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy may be effective for NEC even with node metastasis when R0 resection can be achieved. Systemic chemotherapy is relatively effective for advanced NEC, although early progression frequently develops.

A competing-risks nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis for cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma

The objective of this study is to estimate the probability of cause-specific mortality using a competing-risks nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis in a large population-based cohort of patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma. The surveillance, epidemiology and end results database was used to identify 162 patients diagnosed with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma from 1998 to 2014. We estimated a cumulative incidence function for cause-specific mortality. A nomogram was constructed by using a proportional subdistribution hazard model, validated using bootstrap cross-validation, and evaluated with a decision curve analysis to assess its clinical utility. Finally, we performed risk stratification using a recursive partitioning analysis to divide patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma into clinically useful prognostic groups. Tumor location, distant metastasis, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with cause-specific mortality. The calibration plots demonstrated good concordance between the predicted and actual outcomes. The discrimination performance of a Fine-Gray model was evaluated by using the c-index, which was 0.723 for cause-specific mortality. The decision curve analysis ranged from 0.268 to 0.968 for the threshold probability at which the risk model provided net clinical benefits relative to hypothetical all-screening and no-screening scenarios. The risk groups stratified by a recursive partitioning analysis allowed significant distinction between cumulative incidence curves. We determined the probability of cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and developed a nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis stratification system based on a competing-risks model. The nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis appear to be suitable for risk stratification of cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and will help clinicians to identify patients at increased risk of cause-specific mortality to guide treatment and surveillance decisions.

Radiotherapy for small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: outcomes and prognostic factors from a retrospective study

Background

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is characterized by its progressive feature and poor prognosis. There is no consensus on a standard therapeutic modality for SCCE. In this study, we aimed to characterize the outcomes of primary SCCE patients treated by radiation therapy as part of treatment and investigate prognostic factors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 42 SCCE patients who were treated by RT as part of treatment at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2001 to 2014. The Kaplan-Meier and log-rank method were used to analyze survival. Cox’s hazard regression model was applied to determine prognostic factors.

Results

Of the 42 enrolled patients, 25 had limited disease (LD) and 17 with extensive disease (ED). The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 60.0% (21/35). The median overall survival time (OS) for whole and LD group were 12.9 and 36.8 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of the whole cohort were 64.9, 31.3, and 13.9%, respectively. OS was significantly longer in patients with ECOG performance score (ECOG PS) < 2 (p = 0.001), lesion length ≤ 5 cm (p = 0.001), and LD (p = 0.049). In the patients with LD, multivariate analysis indicated that combined with chemotherapy (P = 0.046) and higher radiation dose (P = 0.027) predicted better prognosis in OS. The overall rate of grade 3–4 toxicities in the whole cohort was 37.5%. In total, 65% (17/26) patients with recurrent disease died with the metastasis with or without the primary recurrence.

Conclusion

RT was one of the effective and safe treatments for locoregional control of SCCE. Lower ECOG PS score, shorter lesion length, treated with chemotherapy, and a higher dose of RT were identified as favorable independent prognostic factors.

Is There a Role for Surgery in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Esophagus? A Contemporary View from the NCDB

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine tumors (eNETs) are exceedingly rare, aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Treatment guidelines are ill-defined and mainly based on evidence from case reports and analogous experiences drawn from similar disease sites.

METHODS

The NCDB was reviewed for histologically confirmed stage I-III, primary eNETs from 2006 to 2014. Patients were grouped into whether or not they underwent primary tumor resection. Univariate, multivariable, and full bipartite propensity score (PS) adjusted Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall and relative survival differences.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients were identified. Mean age was 65.0 (standard deviation [SD] 11.9) years, and 174 (69.6%) patients were male. Most patients had stage III disease (n = 136, 54.4%), and the most common type of NET was small cell eNET (n = 111, 44.4%). Chemotherapy was used in 186 (74.4%), radiation therapy in 178 (71.2%), and oncological resection was performed in 69 (27.6%) patients. Crude 2-year survival rates were higher in the operated (57.3%) compared with the nonoperated group (35.2%; p < 0.001). The survival benefit held true after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.69, p < 0.001). After full bipartite PS adjustment analysis, survival was longer for patients who received a surgical resection compared with those who did not (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.75, p = 0.003) with a corresponding 2-year overall survival rate of 63.3% (95% CI 52.0-77.2) versus 38.8% (95% CI 30.9-48.8), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal treatment that includes surgery is associated with better overall survival for eNETs. Additional research is needed to more definitively identify patients who benefit from esophagectomy and to establish an appropriate treatment algorithm.

Case report of aggressive treatments for large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus

•

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare and highly aggressive disease.

•

A case of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus in a 73-year-old male patient with aggressive surgical treatment.

•

We performed subtotal esophagectomy, partial hepatectomy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy using cisplatin and irinotecan.

•

We believe that aggressive treatment can become one treatment option with the aim of extending survival.

Introduction

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare and highly aggressive disease, and the biological features are poorly understood.

Presentation of case

We report a case of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus in a 73-year-old male patient with aggressive surgical treatment. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed an esophageal large mass. Histological examination of biopsy specimens indicated a neuroendocrine carcinoma. First, we performed subtotal esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy, but he experienced metastasis at the liver and rib 5 months later. Next, we performed partial hepatectomy and radiotherapy for rib metastasis, but he experienced metastasis at the left pulmonary hilar lymph node and sacral bone. Finally, we performed chemotherapy using cisplatin and irinotecan.

Discussion

The therapeutic strategy for large-cell NEC of the esophagus is unestablished. Thus, accumulating the therapeutic results garnered from various treatment tools is considerably important.

Conclusion

Aggressive multimodal treatments including surgery have a possibility to gain better survival in patients with large-cell NEC of the esophagus.

Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence in Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Retrospective Study of 125 Cases

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate and analyze the prognostic factors affecting lymph node (LN) metastasis and postoperative recurrence in patients with primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE). Methods: A total of 125 primary SCCE patients who received surgical resection in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between March 2005 and August 2009 were included in this retrospective study. All the potential prognostic variables, including the patients' characteristics, tumor features, and treatment modalities, were analyzed by a Cox regression model to explore LN metastasis and the factors associated with postoperative recurrence. Results: LN metastasis rate was significantly correlated with depth of tumor invasion (p < 0.001) and tumor length (p = 0.006). LN metastasis ratio was positively correlated with pathological type (p < 0.001), tumor location (p = 0.002), depth of tumor invasion (p < 0.001), and tumor length (p < 0.001). LN stage and chemotherapy were found to be the independent risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS). Conclusion: Depth of tumor invasion and tumor length were main factors associated with LN metastasis in primary SCCE. The stage of LN metastasis and chemotherapy was independent factors affecting the postoperative PFS.

A rare case of bipartite combined tumour of the oesophagus

Background

Bipartite combined oesophageal tumours are an exceedingly rare entity and much less is known about the natural history of these tumours following curative surgery. The authors present a case of a bipartite combined oesophageal tumour comprising of sarcomatoid carcinoma and small cell carcinoma with early postoperative recurrence.

Case presentation

A 63-year-old Chinese male with a smoking history presents with hemoptysis on a background of dysphagia and odynophagia for 1 month. An endoscopic evaluation found an exophytic oesophageal tumour with contact bleeding for which biopsy of this lesion returned as a malignant high-grade tumour where immunohistochemistry staining was unable to establish the lineage of the tumour. Differential diagnoses include sarcomatoid carcinoma and malignant undifferentiated sarcoma. With the provisional diagnosis of a high-grade oesopheageal sarcoma, the patient underwent minimally invasive McKeown’s oesophagectomy. Final histological assessment was pT1bN0 with two histological types of malignancy within a single tumour—70% poorly differentiated spindle cell squamous carcinoma and small cell carcinoma. He was planned for adjuvant chemotherapy in view of the small cell carcinoma component after the resolution of the postoperative infective collections. A computed tomographic scan performed 4 months postoperatively demonstrated metastasis to the lung, pleura, thoracic nodes and liver. Biopsy of the largest lung nodule confirmed small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with features similar to the small cell carcinoma component in the prior oesophagectomy specimen. He was thereafter initiated on palliative chemotherapy aimed at three weekly carboplatin and etoposide aimed at a total of 4 cycles with peglasta support. Etoposide was stopped during the first cycle due to asymptomatic bradycardia. The regime was then converted to carboplatin with irinotecan for 5 cycles. Repeat computed tomographic scan performed 3 weeks after the completion of chemotherapy showed a complete response of lung and liver metastasis and no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis.

Conclusion

The management of bipartite combined oesophageal tumours should be guided by its more aggressive component. Bipartite combined oesophageal tumours with a small cell carcinoma component are believed to demonstrate aggressive tumour biology likened to that of primary oesophageal small cell carcinoma. Preoperative confirmation of a combined tumour may be challenging, and biopsy results may only yield one of the two components. The more aggressive component is usually a small cell carcinoma, for which the mainstay of therapy is platinum-based chemotherapy rather than surgery.

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: Comparison between a Chinese cohort and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data

Background

The optimal standard treatment for primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) remains undetermined. In this study, we conducted two areas of research on SCCE. First, we analyzed differences in SCCE characteristics between Chinese and U.S. patients. Second, we evaluated optimal treatment strategies for SCCE in the Chinese cohort.

Methods

Data from 137 Chinese SCCE patients collected from two cancer centers in China were compared with 385 SCCE patients registered in the U.S. SEER program. Prognostic factors were further analyzed in the Chinese group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline features between the groups.

Results

There were more Chinese SCCE patients with regional stage disease (41.6%) and surgery was the principal local therapy (78.1%), while 51.7% of U.S. patients was at advanced stages and tended to receive radiotherapy as the main therapy (45.2%). Median overall survival (MST) of Chinese patients was 15.0 months, compared with 8.0 months for U.S. patients (P < 0.001). However, the survival differences between groups disappeared after PSM (MST: 12.5 m vs 9.0 m, P = 0.144). Further analysis found that surgery tended to achieve clinical benefits only for patients with localized disease (T1‐4aN0M0). Radiotherapy and chemotherapy may prolong survival in patients with regional and extensive disease.

Conclusions

Although there are huge differences in the tumor characteristics and treatment modalities of SCCE between Chinese and U.S. patients, the prognosis of SCCE is equally poor in both. Surgery should be considered for patients with localized disease, while chemoradiotherapy is recommended for patients with regional and extensive disease.

A comparative analysis of clinicopathological factors between esophageal small cell and basaloid squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal small cell carcinoma (E-SmCC) and basaloid squamous cell carcinomas (BSCCs) are both highly aggressive malignancies, but their detailed differences in clinical behaviors have remained virtually unknown. In addition, treatment strategies of the patients with E-SmCC have not been established. 29 cases of E-SmCC and 39 with BSCC were examined in this study to clarify the clinical features and outcome of the patients with E-SmCC and to compare the findings with those of BSCC. E-SmCCs presented a more advanced status than BSCC (TNM Stage: P = .002). Esophagectomy was performed in 15 small cell carcinoma patients and 14 were treated with non-surgical/systemic therapy. The clinical outcome of the small cell carcinoma cases was significantly worse than those with BSCC (P = .001), but results of a stage-stratified analysis revealed that the Stage I small cell carcinoma patients presented favorable prognosis (3-year survival rate 100%, n = 4). In contrast, among those with Stage II-IV, clinical outcome tended to be better in the systemic therapy group (3-year survival rate 49%, n = 13) than the surgically treated group (3-year survival rate 0%, n = 12). E-SmCC was a more aggressive neoplasm than BSCC. However, early detection could possibly improve the clinical outcome of patients with E-SmCC. Systemic therapy could also benefit the patients with advanced disease (Stage II-IV).

The Role of Surgery in Treating Resectable Limited Disease of Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare malignant tumor. The role of surgery in resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC remains unclear. How to select a specific group of limited disease of esophageal NEC who might benefit from surgery remains to be answered.

METHODS

Patients undergoing esophagectomy for resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC in our department from January 2007 to June 2015 were analyzed. TNM staging system was applied to describe those patients, and according to their different long-term prognosis after surgery, those patients were subgrouped into surgery response limited disease (SRLD) group and surgery non-response limited disease (SNRLD) group. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients with resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC were identified for analysis. The median survival time of those patients was 21.5 months. There was no significant survival differences among stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB patients, but all these patients had significantly longer survival than stage III patients. Therefore, stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB patients were aggregated together as SRLD group, and stage III patients were aggregated as SNRLD group. SRLD patients obtained significantly longer survival than SNRLD patients in both univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. Moreover, adjuvant therapy could significantly benefit SRLD patients (P = 0.004) but could not benefit SNRLD patients (P = 0.136).

CONCLUSIONS

Different responses to surgery existed in resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC indicating the need of further subgrouping for those patients. The resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC could be further subgrouped into SRLD group and SNRLD group according to the TNM staging system.

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of Limited-Stage Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

INTRODUCTION

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE) is characterized by high malignancy, early metastasis, and poor prognosis. This retrospective study aimed to review the clinical characteristics of patients with limited-stage PSCCE and determine the relevant prognostic factors and optimal treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 152 consecutive patients with limited-stage PSCCE between January 2007 and December 2015. Prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate analysis and a Cox regression model. Subgroup analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of treatment strategy on survival.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that treatment modality (p = 0.034) and N stage (p = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors. Patients with stage I or IIA PSCCE who underwent an operation alone exhibited better survival than those who did not undergo an operation (median survival time 29 versus 17.4 months [p = 0.031]), and postoperative adjuvant therapy did not increase overall survival or disease-free survival (p > 0.05). The overall survival rate of patients with stage III PSCCE who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) was significantly better than that of patients who underwent an operation alone or did not undergo an operation (p = 0.021 and p = 0.026, respectively); additionally, nCT could increase disease-free survival (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment modalities and N stage are independent prognostic factors. Radical esophagectomy should be considered as the primary treatment for stage I or IIA PSCCE, and nCT followed by esophagectomy could be an effective treatment option for stage III PSCCE. Multicenter randomized studies are required to confirm the role of nCT in the management of limited-stage PSCCE.

Progress in the treatment of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma

Esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare. With the improvement and popularization of diagnostic methods, the morbidity statistics have increased annually in recent years. There are currently no treatment guidelines for esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms, and surgery is the only cure. This usually involves radical surgery when the tumor is limited to the primary site or when only regional lymph node metastasis occurs. Surgical treatment is key to treating esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms, but combined treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can significantly improve patient survival. The effect of radiotherapy alone on this disease is poor. However, targeted endocrine therapy can improve endocrine hormone symptoms. The prognosis of patients with esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms is mainly determined by the pathological stage. With the development of molecular biology techniques, the combination of targeted drugs and traditional chemotherapy is expected to provide novel ideas and directions for the treatment of esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms in the coming years. In this article, the status of esophageal neuroendocrine tumor treatments was reviewed in detail.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus: Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of 14 cases

Background

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the esophagus is a rare and highly aggressive disease but the biological features are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of NEC of the esophagus.

Methods

Fourteen patients diagnosed with NEC of the esophagus from 1998 to 2013 were included in this study. Clinicopathologic features, therapeutic outcomes and immunohistochemical results were analyzed.

Results

Eleven out of 14 cases showed protruding or localized type with or without ulceration. Only three patients were negative for both lymph node and organ metastasis and seven cases were positive for metastases to distant organs and/or distant lymph nodes. Of the six patients with limited disease (LD), three patients were treated by surgery. Three patients with LD and seven patients with extensive disease (ED) were initially treated with chemotherapy, except for one who underwent concurrent chemo-radiotherapy due to passage disturbance. The median survival of patients with LD was 8.5 months, whereas that of patients with LD was 17 months. Among the 14 cases, 12 cases (83.3%), 13 cases (91.7%) and 12 cases (83.3%) showed positive immunostaining for choromogranin A, synaptophysin and CD56, respectively. Nine of 14 cases (64.2%) presented positive staining for c-kit and most (8/9, 88%) simultaneously showed p53 protein abnormality. Two cases were negative for c-kit and p53, and positive for CK20.

Conclusion

Consistent with previous reports, the prognosis of NEC of esophagus is dismal. From the results of immunohistochemical study, NEC of esophagus might be divided into two categories due to the staining positivity of c-kit and p53. This study provides new insight into the biology of NEC of the esophagus.

Treatment and survival outcomes of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

Given the paucity of esophageal small cell carcinoma (SCC) cases, there are few large studies evaluating this disease. In this study, the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was utilized to analyze the clinical features, treatment, and survival of patients with esophageal SCC in a large, population-based dataset. We selected patients diagnosed with esophageal SCC from 1998 to 2011. Patients were identified as having no treatment, chemotherapy alone, radiation ± sequential chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiation, and esophagectomy ± chemotherapy and/or radiation. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with OS. A total of 583 patients were identified. Most patients had stage IV disease (41.7%). Regarding treatment selection, chemoradiation was the most commonly utilized for patients with nonmetasatic disease, whereas chemotherapy alone was most common for metastatic patients. Esophagectomy (median survival 44.9 months with 3 year OS 50.5%) was associated with the best OS for patients with localized (node-negative) disease compared with chemotherapy alone (p < 0.001) or chemoradiation (p = 0.01). For locoregional (node-positive) disease, treatment with chemoradiation resulted in a median survival of 17.8 months and a 3 year OS 31.6%. On multivariate analysis, treatment with chemotherapy alone (p = 0.003) was associated with worse OS while esophagectomy (p = 0.04) was associated with improved OS compared to chemoradiation. Esophageal SCC is an aggressive malignancy with most patients presenting with metastatic disease. Either esophagectomy or chemoradiation as part of multimodality treatment appear to improve OS for selected patients with nonmetastatic disease.

Management of treatment-naïve limited-stage small cell esophagus carcinoma

Objectives:

To identify the problems and principles of treatment decisions in treatment-naïve limited-stage small cell esophagus carcinoma (LD-SCEC).

Methods:

Clinical data from 39 patients with LD-SCEC treated in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively collected with regard to pathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and relevant prognostic factors.

Results:

The median OS was 21.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.4-29.7 months). The one-year OS was 76%, 3-year was 25%, and the 5-year OS was 8%. Depth of invasion, lymph metastasis status, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Of the 39 cases, only 38.4% (15 cases) were diagnosed as SCEC by the biopsy specimen. Eight of the 15 patients (group A) received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, while the remaining 7 patients (group B) and the other 24 patients (group C) received surgery as initial treatment. The one-year survival of group A was 87%, of group B was 69%, and of group C was 74% (p=0.037). The accuracy of the biopsy diagnosis influenced the treatment decisions and prognosis.

Conclusion:

Small cell esophagus carcinoma is a systemic disease, with depth of invasion, lymph metastasis status, and chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors. Systemic therapy based on chemotherapy is recommended. The top priority is to improve the accuracy of diagnosis before deciding on the initial treatment option.

Role of surgery in the management and prognosis of limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare, highly aggressive tumor characterized by early dissemination and a poor prognosis. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have been used alone or in combination for the treatment of this rare disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the role of surgery in the management of limited-stage SCCE at a high-volume center. We retrospectively evaluated 73 patients with limited-stage SCCE who received an esophagectomy at our center from January 1994 to December 2011. The clinical characteristics, median survival times (MSTs), overall survival (OS), and relevant prognostic factors were analyzed. The overall MST was 23.0 months, and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 61.6%, 47.9%, 22.7%, and 10.6%, respectively. The MST for patients without lymph node involvement (33.0 months) was greater than the MST for patients with lymph node involvement (17.0 months) (P = 0.014). Similarly, patients who underwent radical resection had a greater MST (25.0 months) than patients who underwent palliative resection (7.0 months) (P = 0.004). Patients who received chemotherapy had a greater MST (27.0 months) than patients who did not receive chemotherapy (13.0 months) (P = 0.021). Survival analysis confirmed that a radical operation, chemotherapy, and lymph node involvement were independent prognostic factors. This study suggests that radical resection combined with chemotherapy should be recommended for patients with limited-stage SCCE, especially patients with negative regional lymph nodes. A lack of lymph node metastasis was a good prognostic factor because patients without lymph node involvement had greater OS.

Detailed analysis of prognostic factors in primary esophageal small cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is characterized as highly aggressive with a poor prognosis. To identify potential prognostic factors and to assess the role of surgical procedures, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for SCCE, we retrospectively analyzed patients with SCCE from three large institutions in China.

METHODS

All of the SCCE patients between 1998 and 2012 were identified from three clinical databases of the Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Peking Union Cancer Hospital and Shantou Cancer Hospital. Potential prognostic factors were analyzed with univariate analysis and a Cox regression model. Subgroup analysis based on the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for esophageal cancer was applied to examine the effect of treatment on survival.

RESULTS

In patients with stage I/II SCCE, 85% underwent operations and showed improved survival (median survival time [MST] 29 vs 17.4 months, p = 0.082). However, chemotherapy did not further improve survival. In patients with stage IIB/III SCCE, chemotherapy, instead of operation, improved survival (MST 13.0 vs 6.1 months, p = 0.003), and radiotherapy resulted in improved survival. In stage IV patients, chemotherapy improved survival (MST 12.5 vs 4.0 months, p < 0.001), and chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy was superior to chemotherapy alone (MST 13.2 vs 8.9 months, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical procedures alone can be recommended for stage I/IIA patients. In patients with stage IIB disease or above, chemotherapy should be the main treatment approach, and chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy tended to improve survival.