Lymph Node Evaluation Achieved by Open Lobectomy Compared With Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for N0 Lung Cancer

A New Deep Learning-Based Method for Automated Identification of Thoracic Lymph Node Stations in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS): A Proof-of-Concept Study

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a cornerstone in minimally invasive thoracic lymph node sampling. In lung cancer staging, precise assessment of lymph node position is crucial for clinical decision-making. This study aimed to demonstrate a new deep learning method to classify thoracic lymph nodes based on their anatomical location using EBUS images. Bronchoscopists labeled lymph node stations in real-time according to the Mountain Dressler nomenclature. EBUS images were then used to train and test a deep neural network (DNN) model, with intraoperative labels as ground truth. In total, 28,134 EBUS images were acquired from 56 patients. The model achieved an overall classification accuracy of 59.5 ± 5.2%. The highest precision, sensitivity, and F1 score were observed in station 4L, 77.6 ± 13.1%, 77.6 ± 15.4%, and 77.6 ± 15.4%, respectively. The lowest precision, sensitivity, and F1 score were observed in station 10L. The average processing and prediction time for a sequence of ten images was 0.65 ± 0.04 s, demonstrating the feasibility of real-time applications. In conclusion, the new DNN-based model could be used to classify lymph node stations from EBUS images. The method performance was promising with a potential for clinical use.

Prognostic value of lymph node metrics in lung squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of the SEER database

INTRODUCTION

Although the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging system is widely used for staging lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), the TNM system primarily emphasizes tumor size and metastasis, without adequately considering lymph node involvement. Consequently, incorporating lymph node metastasis as an additional prognostic factor is essential for predicting outcomes in LSCC patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with LSCC between 2004 and 2018 and was based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of the National Cancer Institute. The primary endpoint of the study was cancer-specific survival (CSS), and demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, and treatment regimens were incorporated into the predictive model. The study focused on the value of indicators related to pathological lymph node testing, including the lymph node ratio (LNR), regional node positivity (RNP), and lymph node examination count (RNE), in the prediction of cancer-specific survival in LSCC. A prognostic model was established using a multivariate Cox regression model, and the model was evaluated using the C index, Kaplan-Meier, the Akaike information criterion (AIC), decision curve analysis (DCA), continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and the predictive efficacy of different models was compared.

RESULTS

A total of 14,200 LSCC patients (2004-2018) were divided into training and validation cohorts. The 10-year CSS rate was approximately 50%, with no significant survival differences between cohorts (p = 0.8). The prognostic analysis revealed that models incorporating LNR, RNP, and RNE demonstrated superior performance over the TNM model. The LNR and RNP models demonstrated better model fit, discrimination, and reclassification, with AUC values of 0.695 (training) and 0.665 (validation). The RNP and LNR models showed similar predictive performance, significantly outperforming the TNM and RNE models. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility and net benefit of the LNR and RNP models in predicting long-term CSS for LSCC patients, highlighting their value in clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that RNP status is an independent prognostic factor for CSS in LSCC, with predictive efficacy comparable to LNR, with both models enhancing survival prediction beyond TNM staging.

Automatic Segmentation of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes and Blood Vessels in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) Images Using Deep Learning

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is used in the minimally invasive sampling of thoracic lymph nodes. In lung cancer staging, the accurate assessment of mediastinal structures is essential but challenged by variations in anatomy, image quality, and operator-dependent image interpretation. This study aimed to automatically detect and segment mediastinal lymph nodes and blood vessels employing a novel U-Net architecture-based approach in EBUS images. A total of 1161 EBUS images from 40 patients were annotated. For training and validation, 882 images from 30 patients and 145 images from 5 patients were utilized. A separate set of 134 images was reserved for testing. For lymph node and blood vessel segmentation, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) values of the Dice similarity coefficient were 0.71 ± 0.35 and 0.76 ± 0.38, those of the precision were 0.69 ± 0.36 and 0.82 ± 0.22, those of the sensitivity were 0.71 ± 0.38 and 0.80 ± 0.25, those of the specificity were 0.98 ± 0.02 and 0.99 ± 0.01, and those of the F1 score were 0.85 ± 0.16 and 0.81 ± 0.21, respectively. The average processing and segmentation run-time per image was 55 ± 1 ms (mean ± SD). The new U-Net architecture-based approach (EBUS-AI) could automatically detect and segment mediastinal lymph nodes and blood vessels in EBUS images. The method performed well and was feasible and fast, enabling real-time automatic labeling.

Lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery: a comparison between robot-assisted vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic approach

BACKGROUND

TNM staging is the most important prognosticator for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Staging has significant implications for the treatment modality for these patients. Lymph node dissection in robot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) surgery remains an area of ongoing evaluation. In this study, we aim to compare lymph node dissection in RATS and VATS approach for lung resection in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively compiled a database of 717 patients from July 31, 2015-July 7, 2022, who underwent either a wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy. We analysed the database according to lymph node dissection. The database was divided into RATS (n = 375) and VATS (n = 342) procedures.

RESULTS

The mean number of lymph nodes harvested overall with RATS was 6.1 ± 1.5 nodes; with VATS approach, it was 5.53 ± 1.8 nodes. The mean number of N1 stations harvested was 2.66 ± 0.8 with RATS, 2.36 ± 0.9 with VATS. RATS approach showed statistically higher lymph node dissection rates compared to VATS (p = 0.002). Out of the 375 RATS procedures, 26 (6.4%) patients undergoing a RATS procedure were upstaged from N0/N1 staging to N2. N0/N1-N2 upstaging was reported in 28 of 342 (8.2%) patients undergoing a VATS procedure. The majority of upstaging was seen in N0-N2 disease: 19 of 375 (5%) for RATS and 23 of 342 (6.7%) for VATS.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that in RATS procedures, there is a higher rate of lymph node dissection compared to VATS procedures. Upstaging was mostly seen in N0-N2 disease, this was observed at a higher rate with VATS procedures.

En Bloc Resection of a Primary Tumor and Lymph Nodes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

We established a novel surgical procedure for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which involves resection of the affected lobe and regional lymph nodes without separation, namely en bloc surgery. We introduced the technical details and early and late outcomes by comparing them with those of conventional surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent lobectomy with hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection for stages I-III NSCLC. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed based on demographic variables.

RESULTS

Propensity score-matching yielded 317 pairs. En bloc surgery was not associated with a longer operation time, a higher amount of intraoperative bleeding, or a higher frequency of postoperative complications. The number of resected lymph nodes (P = 0.277) and frequency of N upstaging (P = 0.587) did not differ between the groups. However, en bloc surgery was associated with higher overall survival in comparison to conventional surgery (P = 0.012). According to a stratification analysis, the survival advantage of en bloc surgery over conventional surgery was remarkable in pathological N-positive disease (P = 0.005), whereas it disappeared in pathological N-negative disease (P = 0.147).

CONCLUSION

En bloc surgery is feasible and can be performed in patients with possible N-positive NSCLC.

Results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for lung cancer in a mixed practice medium-volume hospital: a propensity-matched study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy for non-small-cell lung cancer in a medium-volume centre, where cardiothoracic surgeons perform both cardiac and general thoracic surgery. The primary outcome of interest was 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival. Secondary outcomes were short-term postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and lymph node yield.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including 670 lung cancer patients undergoing VATS (n = 207) or open surgery (n = 463) with a curative intent in Oulu University Hospital between the years 2000-2020. Propensity score matching was implemented with surgical technique as the dependent and age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, pulmonary function, pathological stage, histological type and the year of the operation as covariates resulting in 127 pairs.

RESULTS

In the propensity-matched cohort, 5-year overall survival was 64.3% after VATS and 63.2% after thoracotomy (P = 0.969). Five-year disease-specific survival was 71.6% vs 76.2% (P = 0.559). There were no differences in overall (34.6% vs 44.9%, p = 0.096) or major postoperative complications (8.7% vs 14.2%, P = 0.167) between the study groups. The average length of hospital stay was shorter (5.8 vs 6.6 days, P = 0.012) and the median lymph node yield was lower (4.0 vs 7.0, P < 0.001) in the VATS group compared to the thoracotomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

According to this study, the long-term results of lung cancer surgery in a mixed practice are comparable between VATS and open surgery.

True Prevalence of Unforeseen N2 Disease in NSCLC: A Systematic Review + Meta-Analysis

Patients with unforeseen N2 (uN2) disease are traditionally considered to have an unfavorable prognosis. As preoperative and intraoperative mediastinal staging improved over time, the prevalence of uN2 changed. In this review, the current evidence on uN2 disease and its prevalence will be evaluated. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies or completed, published trials that included uN2 disease until 6 April 2023, without language restrictions. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to score the included papers. A total of 512 articles were initially identified, of which a total of 22 studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. Despite adequate mediastinal staging, the pooled prevalence of true unforeseen pN2 (9387 patients) was 7.97% (95% CI 6.67-9.27%), with a pooled OS after five years (892 patients) of 44% (95% CI 31-58%). Substantial heterogeneity regarding the characteristics of uN2 disease limited our meta-analysis considerably. However, it seems patients with uN2 disease represent a subcategory with a similar prognosis to stage IIb if complete surgical resection can be achieved, and the contribution of adjuvant therapy is to be further explored.

Robotic versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes of a Propensity Matched Analysis

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has gained popularity for the treatment of lung cancer, but its quality outcome measures are still being evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of lung cancer resection using RATS versus video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). To achieve this aim, we conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent lung cancer surgery between July 2015 and December 2020. A propensity-matched analysis was performed based on patients' performance status, forced expiratory volume in 1 s% of predicted, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide% of predicted, and surgical procedure (lobectomy or segmentectomy). Following propensity matching, a total of 613 patients were included in the analysis, of which 328 underwent RATS, and 285 underwent VATS, with satisfactory performance indicators. The results of the analysis indicated that RATS had a significantly longer operating time than VATS (132.4 ± 37.3 versus 122.4 ± 27.7 min; mean difference of 10 min 95% CI [confidence interval], 4.2 to 15.9 min; p = 0.001). On the other hand, VATS had a significantly higher estimated blood loss compared to RATS (169.7 ± 237.2 versus 82.2 ± 195.4 mL; mean difference of 87.5 mL; 95% CI, 48.1 to 126.8 mL; p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the duration of chest tubes, length of hospital stay, low- and high-grade complications, as well as readmissions and mortality within 30 days after surgery. Moreover, the number of dissected lymph-node stations was significantly higher with VATS than RATS (5.9 ± 1.5 versus 4.8 ± 2.2; mean difference of 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.5; p = 0.001). Nonetheless, the percentage of patients who were upstaged after histopathological analysis of the resected lymph nodes was similar between the two groups. In conclusion, RATS and VATS yielded comparable results for most of the short-term outcomes assessed. Further research is needed to validate the implementation of RATS and identify its potential benefits over VATS.

Preoperative PET-SUVmax and volume based PET parameters of the primary tumor fail to predict nodal upstaging in early-stage lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Accurate nodal staging is of utmost importance in patients with lung cancer. FDG-PET/CT imaging is now part of the routine staging. Despite thorough preoperative staging nodal upstaging still occurs in early-stage lung cancer. However, the predictive value of preoperative PET metrics of the primary tumor on nodal upstaging remains to be unexplored. Our aim was to assess the association of these preoperative PET-parameters with nodal upstaging in histologically confirmed lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

From January 2016 to November 2018, 500 patients with pT1-T2/cN0 lung cancer received an anatomical resection with curative intent. 171 patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and available PET-CTs were retrospectively included. We analyzed the the association of nodal upstaging with preoperative PET-SUVmax and metabolic PET metrics including total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) with different defined thresholds.

RESULTS

High values of preoperative PET-SUVmax of the primary tumor were associated with squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.0001) and with larger tumors (p < 0.0001). Increased preoperative C-reactive protein levels (<1mg/dL) correlated significantly with high preoperative PET-SUVmax values (p < 0.0001). No significant relationship between PET-SUVmax and lactate dehydrogenase activity (p = 0.6818), white blood cell count (p = 0.7681), gender (p = 0.1115) or age (p = 0.9284) was observed. Nodal upstaging rate was 14.0 % with 8.8 % N1 and 5.3 % N2 upstaging. Tumor size (p = 0.0468) and number of removed lymph nodes (p = 0.0461) were significant predictors of nodal upstaging but no significant association was found with histology or PET parameters. Of note, increased MTV - regardless of the threshold - tended to associate with nodal upstaging.

CONCLUSION

Early-stage lung cancer patients with squamous histology and T2 tumors presented increased preoperative PET-SUVmax values. Nevertheless, beyond tumor size and number of removed lymph nodes neither SUVmax nor metabolic PET parameters MTV and TLG were significant predictors of nodal upstaging.

The comparison of Lobe-Specific or Systematic Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection for Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma With Consolidation Tumor Ratio Over 0.5

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer. This study will propose a personalized plan for mediastinal lymph node dissection in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma to reduce the risk of surgery and improve the quality of life.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the patients underwent lobectomy and lymph node dissection in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with solid component ratio (CTR) between 0.5 and 1 were included. Patients were divided into systematic (S-MLND) and lobe-specific (L-MLND) mediastinal lymph node dissection groups. The days of hospitalization, the presence or absence of complications, the recurrence-free survival rate, and the overall survival rate were calculated to evaluate the postoperative quality and operation risk of the patients.

RESULTS

210 patients (138 L-MLND and 72 S-MLND) were included. 2 lymph node metastases appeared in the S-MLND group while none in the L-MLND group (P = .049). No differences were shown in age, tumor site, size, solid component, degree of tumor invasion, and stage. The proportion of patients with severe postoperative cough and the length of hospital stay in the L-MLND group decreased. The 5-year OS of the entire cohort was 98.1%, 98.6% in L-MLND, compared with 97.2% in S-MLND; RFS was 94.8%, 95.7% in L-MLND, compared with 93.0% in S-MLND.

CONCLUSION

For cIA lung adenocarcinoma, according to the Thin-slice CT within 1 month before the operation, if the main lesion was less than 3 cm and CTR over 0.5, L-MLND is as effective as S-MLND.

A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered the standard procedure for surgical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still lingering speculation on its adequacy of lymph node (LN) dissection or sampling and the long-term survival benefits when compared to open thoracotomy. Given the above, we conducted a systematic review comparing VATS and thoracotomy in terms of their oncological effectiveness in resection. We explored major research literature databases and search engines such as MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate to find pertinent articles. After the meticulous screening, quality check, and applying relevant filters according to our eligibility criteria, we identified 16 studies relevant to our research question, out of which one was a randomized controlled trial, one meta-analysis, and 14 were observational studies. The study comprised 44,673 patients with NSCLC, out of whom 15,093 patients were operated by VATS and the remaining 29,580 patients by thoracotomy. The results indicate that VATS is equivalent to thoracotomy in total LNs (N1 + N2) and LN stations dissected. However, a thoracotomy may achieve slightly better mediastinal lymph node dissection (N2) in terms of assessing a greater number of mediastinal lymph nodes and nodal stations. This may be attributed to a better visual field during mediastinal nodal clearance by an open approach. Also, nodal upstaging was consistently more common with an open approach. In terms of long-term outcomes, both overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups, with VATS offering a slightly better survival benefit. Irrespective of the increased rates of nodal upstaging by an open approach, we conclude that VATS should be considered a highly efficient alternative to thoracotomy in both early and locally advanced NSCLC.

RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer

Background

Retrospective data demonstrates that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides many benefits, such as decreased postoperative pain, lower mortality, shorter length of stay, shorter chest tube duration, and reductions in the incidence of common postoperative pulmonary complications, when compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Despite the potential benefits of robotic surgery, there are two major barriers against its widespread adoption in thoracic surgery: lack of high-quality prospective data, and the perceived higher cost of it. Therefore, in the face of these barriers, a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing robotic- to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is needed. The RAVAL trial is a two-phase, international, multi-centered, blinded, parallel, randomized controlled trial that is comparing robotic- to video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer that has been enrolling patients since 2016.

Methods

The RAVAL trial will be conducted in two phases: Phase A will enroll 186 early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who are candidates for minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy; while Phase B will continue to recruit until 592 patients are enrolled. After consent, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either robotic- or video-assisted lobectomy, and blinded to the type of surgery they are allocated to. Health-related quality of life questionnaires will be administered at baseline, postoperative day 1, weeks 3, 7, 12, months 6, 12, 18, 24, and years 3, 4, 5. The primary objective of the RAVAL trial is to determine the difference in patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes between the robotic- and video-assisted lobectomy groups at 12 weeks. Secondary objectives include determining the differences in cost-effectiveness, and in the 5-year survival data between the two arms. The results of the primary objective will be reported once Phase A has completed accrual and the 12-month follow-ups are completed. The results of the secondary objectives will be reported once Phase B has completed accrual and the 5-year follow-ups are completed.

Discussion

If successfully completed, the RAVAL Trial will have studied patient-reported outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and survival of robotic- versus video-assisted lobectomy in a prospective, randomized, blinded fashion in an international setting.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02617186. Registered 22-September-2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02617186

The learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy in a high-volume pulmonary center

Objectives

To evaluate the time course and caseload required to achieve proficiency by plotting the learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy.

Methods

We reviewed 127 cases of video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy by a single surgeon at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital to evaluate its learning curve using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. The changes of perioperative outcomes were assessed.

Results

The inflection points of the CUSUM curve were around case 30 and 90, according to which 3 phases were identified: Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III. Significant downtrends were observed regarding operative time (Phase I, 194 [173-233 minutes] vs Phase II, 172 [142-215 minutes] vs Phase III, 138 [117-164 minutes], P < .05, all), blood loss (Phase I, 200 [100-238 mL] vs Phase II, 100 [50-200 mL] vs Phase III, 50 [50-100 mL]; P < .05, all), drainage duration (Phase I [5.53 ± 1.11 days] vs Phase II [4.52 ± 1.38 days]; P < .05), and length of postoperative stays (Phase I [6.60 ± 1.13 days] vs Phase II [5.68 ± 1.47 days], P < .05). The rate of severe complications significantly decreased from Phase I to Phase II (P = .03).

Conclusions

Thirty cases should be accumulated to lay the technical foundation, and 90 cases were required to achieve proficiency. The focus should now shift to providing sufficient training opportunities for centers wanting to implement this technique.

The Role of Surgery in Lung Cancer Treatment: Present Indications and Future Perspectives-State of the Art

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are different today, due to the increased use of screening programs and of innovative systemic therapies, leading to the diagnosis of earlier and pre-invasive tumors, and of more advanced and controlled metastatic tumors. Surgery for NSCLC remains the cornerstone treatment when it can be performed. The role of surgery and surgeons has also evolved because surgeons not only perform the initial curative lung cancer resection but they also accompany and follow-up patients from pre-operative rehabilitation, to treatment for recurrences. Surgery is personalized, according to cancer characteristics, including cancer extensions, from pre-invasive and local tumors to locally advanced, metastatic disease, or residual disease after medical treatment, anticipating recurrences, and patients' characteristics. Surgical management is constantly evolving to offer the best oncologic resection adapted to each NSCLC stage. Today, NSCLC can be considered as a chronic disease and surgery is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrences, and in palliative conditions to relieve dyspnea and improve patients' comfort.

The association of nodal upstaging with surgical approach and its impact on long-term survival after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Proponents of open thoracotomy (OPEN) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) claim its oncological superiority over video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in terms of the accuracy of lymph node staging.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing lobectomy without neoadjuvant therapy from 2010 to 2014. Nodal upstaging rates were compared using a surgical approach. Overall survival adjusted for confounding variables was examined using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 64 676 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. The number of patients who underwent lobectomy by RATS, VATS and OPEN approaches was 5470 (8.5%), 17 545 (27.1%) and 41 661 (64.4%), respectively. The mean number of lymph nodes examined for each of these approaches was 10.9, 11.3 and 10 (P < 0.01) and upstaging rates were 11.2%, 11.7% and 12.6% (P < 0.01), respectively. For patients with clinical stage I disease (N = 46 826; RATS = 4338, VATS = 13 416 and OPEN = 29 072), the mean lymph nodes examined were 10.6, 10.8 and 9.4 (P < 0.01), and upstaging rates were 10.8%, 11.1% and 12.1% (P < 0.01), respectively. A multivariable analysis suggested an association with improved survival with RATS and VATS compared with OPEN surgery [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.89 and 0.89, respectively; P < 0.01] for patients with all stages. In stage I disease, VATS but not RATS was associated with increased overall survival compared with the OPEN approach (HR = 0.81; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

RATS lobectomy is not superior to VATS lobectomy with respect to lymph node yield or upstaging of NSCLC. Increased nodal upstaging by the OPEN approach does not confer a survival advantage in any stage of NSCLC and may be associated with decreased overall survival.

Quality assessment of robot assisted thoracic surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer: nodal upstaging and mediastinal recurrence

Background

Robot assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is the minimally invasive surgical technique of choice for treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), at the Isala Hospital. The aim of this study is to compare clinical and pathological staging results and mediastinal recurrence after RATS for anatomical resections of lung cancer as surrogate markers for quality of mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND).

Methods

This single institute retrospective study was conducted in patients who underwent RATS for NSCLC. Excluded were patients with a history of concurrent malignant disease, with other previous neoplasms, with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and patients in whom the robotic technique was converted to thoracotomy, prior to lymph node dissection. Data were obtained from the hospital database. The difference between clinical and pathological staging was expressed as upstaging and downstaging. Computed Tomography scanning was used for follow-up, and diagnosis of mediastinal recurrence.

Results

From November 2011 to May 2016, 227 patients underwent RATS at Isala Hospital Zwolle, the Netherlands. Of those, 130 (mean age, 69.5±9.3 years) met the eligibility criteria. Preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging was done by endoscopic ultrasound/endobronchial ultrasound, by positron emission tomography (PET) or mediastinoscopy. In 14 patients (10.8%) unforeseen N2 disease was found, 6 patients (4.6%) were upstaged from cN0 to pN2 and 8 patients (6.2%) were upstaged from cN1 to pN2. Mediastinal recurrence was detected in 7 patients (5.4%) during a median follow-up of 54 months (range, 1.5-102 months).

Conclusions

In patients with NSCLC, who underwent anatomical resection by means of RATS, an unforeseen N2 disease rate of 10.8% was demonstrated and a mediastinal recurrence rate of 5.4%. It is concluded that robotic surgery provides an accurate lymph node dissection.

Video-assisted versus open thoracotomy lobectomy: comparison on lymphadenectomy and survival in early stage of lung cancer

Background

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is increasingly used in the surgical treatment of early lung cancer, but the oncological benefits are still controversial. We aimed to compare video-assisted lobectomy and open thoracotomy lobectomy in terms of lymphadenectomy and long-term survival depending on the location of lobectomy.

Methods

A retrospective, multicenter study was based on the Polish Lung Cancer Study Group and included patients with stage I lung cancer who were surgically treated between 2007 and 2015. We included 1410 patients after video-assisted lobectomy and 4,855 after open thoracotomy.

Results

The average number of lymph nodes removed in video-assisted lobectomy was 10.9 and in open thoracotomy lobectomy was 12.9 (P<0.001). The 5-year survival was better in the video-assisted lobectomy group (78.6%) compared to open thoracotomy (73.8%) (P=0.002). Significant differences were found in the case of left lower lobe and left upper lobe lobectomies. Multivariable analysis showed that the prognostic factors for open thoracotomy relative to video-assisted lobectomy are: age over 60 [HR (95% CI): 1.55 (1.17-2.05), P=0.002], female [HR (95% CI): 1.57 (1.07-2.29), P=0.02], squamous cell carcinoma [HR (95% CI): 1.63 (1.12-2.37), P=0.011], left lower lobe [HR (95% CI): 2.69 (1.37-5.27), P=0.004] and left upper lobe [HR (95% CI): 1.53 (1.01-2.33), P=0.047].

Conclusions

The study showed that the number of lymph nodes removed during video-assisted lobectomy is significantly lower than in the open thoracotomy group. The long-term video-assisted lobectomy results were significantly better compared to open thoracotomy. Better long-term results were achieved on the left side of lobectomy.

Perioperative comparison of video-assisted thoracic surgery and open lobectomy for pT1-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients in China: a multi-center propensity score-matched analysis

Background

Compared with open surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has innovated the concept of the minimally invasive approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in past decades. This present study aimed to compare the perioperative and lymph node dissection outcomes between VATS lobectomy and open lobectomy for pathological stage T1 (pT1) NSCLC patients from both surgical and oncologic perspectives.

Methods

This was a retrospective multicenter study. Patients who underwent surgical resection for pT1 NSCLC between January 2014 and September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed from 10 thoracic surgery centers in China. Perioperative and lymph node dissection outcomes of pT1 NSCLC patients who accepted VATS or open lobectomies were compared by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Results

Of the 11,360 patients who underwent surgery for pT1 NSCLC, 7,726 were enrolled based on the selection criteria, including 1,222 cases of open lobectomies and 6,504 cases of VATS lobectomies. PSM resulted in 1,184 cases of open lobectomies and 1,184 cases of VATS lobectomies being well matched by common prognostic variables, including age, sex, and surgical side. VATS lobectomy led to better perioperative outcomes, including less blood loss (133.5±200.1 vs. 233.3±318.4, P<0.001), lower blood transfusion rate (2.4% vs. 6.4%, P<0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (8.6±5.7 vs. 10.1±5.1, P<0.001), less chest drainage volume (1,109.5±854.0 vs. 1,324.1±948.8, P<0.001), and less postoperative complications (4.9% vs. 8.2%, P<0.001). However, open lobectomy had better lymph node dissection outcomes than VATS, with increased lymph node dissection numbers (16.1±9.4 vs. 13.7±7.7, P<0.001) and more positive lymph nodes being dissected (1.5±3.9 vs. 1.1±2.5, P=0.002). Compared with VATS, open lobectomy harvested more lymph node stations (5.5±1.9 vs. 5.2±1.8, P=0.001), including more pathological N2 (pN2) lymph node stations (3.4±1.4 vs. 3.1±1.3, P<0.001).

Conclusions

VATS lobectomy was associated with better perioperative outcomes, such as less blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate, shorter postoperative hospital stay, less chest drainage volume and less postoperative complications. Open lobectomy has improved lymph node dissection outcomes, as more lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes were dissected for pT1 NSCLC patients during surgery.

Outcomes of nodal upstaging comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy for lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

In early stage non-small cell lung cancer, the optimal surgical approach for lymph node dissection remains controversial. Without a uniform standard for the quality of lymph node dissection, outcomes of nodal upstaging comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus open thoracotomy (OPEN) also remain controversial. Thus, we compared the clinical outcomes of nodal upstaging between each approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 1319 surgically resected lung cancer cases between 2008 and 2017 at our institute. Moreover, 348 VATS and 348 OPEN cases were extracted using propensity score matching. We investigated the frequency, prognosis, and post-recurrence course of nodal upstaging between each approach.

RESULTS

A total of 193 nodal upstaging cases were identified. Nodal upstaging was more frequent in the OPEN group (24 %) than the VATS group (9%) (p < 0.001). However, multivariable analysis revealed the surgical approach was not significantly associated with nodal upstaging (OPEN: odds ratio, 1.3; 95 % confidence interval, 0.93-2.02; p = 0.108) and, after matching, nodal upstaging with each approach were of equivalent frequency (p = 0.752). The median follow-up period was 5.0 years. Nodal upstaging was an independent prognostic factor for worse overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival in multivariable analyses (all p < 0.001). Of all cases, 222 recurred after surgery. There were no significant differences in recurrence patterns and initial recurrence sites depending on surgical approach. The 5-year post-recurrence survival rate was 52 % after VATS and 30 % after OPEN; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.052). Moreover, post-recurrence survival rate was not significantly different between the VATS and OPEN groups (pN0: p = 0.268, pN1: p = 0.437, and pN2: p = 0.144).

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of nodal upstaging between VATS and OPEN were found to be equivalent. The difference in the frequency of nodal upstaging was not due to inferior quality of lymph node dissection with VATS; rather, that difference resulted from selection bias.

Completeness of lymph node dissection in patients undergoing minimally invasive- or open surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: A nationwide study

OBJECTIVE

In patients with NSCLC, lymph node metastases are an important prognostic factor. Despite an accurate pre-operative work up, for optimal staging an intrapulmonary- and mediastinal lymph node dissection (LND) as part of the operation is mandatory. The aim of this study is to assess the completeness of LND in patients undergoing an intended curative resection for NSCLC in the Netherlands and to compare performance between open surgery and minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The intraoperative LND was evaluated in 7460 patients who had undergone a lobectomy for clinically staged N0-1 NSCLC (2013-2018). The LND was considered complete, when three mediastinal (N2) lymph node stations, including station 7, were sampled or dissected, in addition to the lymph nodes from station 10 and 11. A comparison was made between open surgery and MIS.

RESULTS

Of 5154 patients, who had MIS, a sufficient intrapulmonary LND was performed in 47.9% and a sufficient mediastinal LND in 58.6%. A complete LND was performed in 31.6%. For 2306 patients who had an open resection, these numbers were 45.0%, 59.0%, and 30.6%, respectively. The overall between-hospital variation in a complete LND ranged between 0 and 72.5%.

CONCLUSION

In the Netherlands, a complete LND of both intrapulmonary- and mediastinal lymph nodes is performed only in a minority of patients with clinically staged N0-1 NSCLC, with substantial between-hospital variation. No differences were seen between open surgery and MIS. Because of poor performance, completeness of lymph node dissection will be recorded as a mandatory performance indicator in our national audit, to improve the quality of resection.

Long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-weighted comparison with open thoracotomy

OBJECTIVES

Although the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach has been accepted as a safe and effective alternative to lobectomy, its advantage remains unclear in advanced-stage lung cancer. This study is aimed to evaluate the feasibility and long-term outcomes of VATS in lung cancer with clinical N1 (cN1) disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1149 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy for cN1 disease from 2006 to 2016. Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates were compared using a propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) technique.

RESULTS

We performed VATS and open thoracotomy for 500 and 649 patients, respectively. All preoperative characteristics became similar between the two groups after IPTW adjustment. Compared to thoracotomy, VATS was associated with shorter hospitalization (7.7 days vs. 9.2 days, p < 0.001), earlier adjuvant chemotherapy (41.7 days vs. 46.6 days, p = 0.028), similar complete resection rates (95.2 % vs. 94.0 %, p = 0.583), and equivalent dissected lymph nodes (27.5 vs. 27.8, p = 0.704). On IPTW-adjusted analysis, overall survival (OS) (59.4 % vs. 60.3 %, p = 0.588) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (59.2 % vs. 56.9 %, p = 0.651) at 5 years were also similar between the two groups. Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that VATS was not a significant prognostic factor for cN1 disease (p = 0.764 for OS and p = 0.879 for RFS).

CONCLUSIONS

VATS lobectomy is feasible for patients with cN1 disease, providing comparable perioperative outcomes, oncologic efficacy, and long-term outcomes as open thoracotomy.

Pulmonary lobectomy for cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic approach

BACKGROUND

Although minimally invasive lobectomy has gained worldwide interest, there has been debate on perioperative and oncological outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes among open lobectomy, video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy, and robotic lobectomy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were consulted. A fully Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies (183,426 patients) were included; 88,865 (48.4%) underwent open lobectomy, 79,171 (43.2%) video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy, and 15,390 (8.4%) robotic lobectomy. Compared with open lobectomy, video-assisted thoracic surgery, lobectomy and robotic lobectomy had significantly reduced 30-day mortality (risk ratio = 0.53; 95% credible intervals, 0.40-0.66 and risk ratio = 0.51; 95% credible intervals, 0.36-0.71), pulmonary complications (risk ratio = 0.70; 95% credible intervals, 0.51-0.92 and risk ratio = 0.69; 95% credible intervals, 0.51-0.88), and overall complications (risk ratio = 0.77; 95% credible intervals, 0.68-0.85 and risk ratio = 0.79; 95% credible intervals, 0.67-0.91). Compared with video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy, open lobectomy, and robotic lobectomy had a significantly higher total number of harvested lymph nodes (mean difference = 1.46; 95% credible intervals, 0.30, 2.64 and mean difference = 2.18; 95% credible intervals, 0.52-3.92) and lymph nodes stations (mean difference = 0.37; 95% credible intervals, 0.08-0.65 and mean difference = 0.93; 95% credible intervals, 0.47-1.40). Positive resection margin and 5-year overall survival were similar across treatments. Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative transfusion, hospital length of stay, and 30-day readmission were significantly reduced for minimally invasive approaches.

CONCLUSION

Compared with open lobectomy, video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy, and robotic lobectomy seem safer with reduced 30-day mortality, pulmonary, and overall complications with equivalent oncologic outcomes and 5-year overall survival. Minimally invasive techniques may improve outcomes and surgeons should be encouraged, when feasible, to adopt video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy, or robotic lobectomy in the treatment of lung cancer.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is feasible for selected patients with clinical N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Few studies have evaluated the usefulness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for advanced-stage lung cancer. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of VATS for treating clinical N2 (cN2) lung cancer. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed with data from 268 patients who underwent lobectomy for cN2 disease from 2007 to 2016. Using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), perioperative and long-term survival outcomes were compared. We performed VATS and open thoracotomy on 121 and 147 patients, respectively. Overall, VATS was preferred for patients with peripherally located tumors (p < 0.001). After IPTW-adjustment, all preoperative information became similar between the groups. Compared to thoracotomy, VATS was associated with shorter hospitalization (7.7 days vs. 9.1 days, p = 0.028), despite equivalent complete resection rates (92.6% vs. 90.5%, p = 0.488) and dissected lymph nodes (mean, 31.9 vs. 29.4, p = 0.100). On IPTW-adjusted analysis, overall survival (50.5% vs. 48.4%, p = 0.127) and recurrence-free survival (60.5% vs 44.6%, p = 0.069) at 5 years were also similar between the groups. Among selected patients with resectable cN2 disease and peripherally located tumors, VATS is feasible, associated with shorter hospitalization and comparable perioperative and long-term survival outcomes, compared with open thoracotomy.

Prognostic value of log odds of positive lymph nodes in node-positive lung squamous cell carcinoma patients after surgery: a SEER population-based study

Background

Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) is a novel and promising ratio-based lymph node (LN) staging system in many malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LODDS, and comprehensively compare the prognostic predictive performance of LODDS with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N classification, number of positive lymph node (NPLN), and lymph node ratio (LNR) among node-positive lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients after surgery.

Methods

We identified 2,561 patients with N1/N2 stage SCC diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. X-tile analysis was used to calculate the optimal cut-off value for each staging system. Univariable and Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess the association of cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) with N, NPLN, LNR, and LODDS, separately, and integrally. Moreover, linear trend χ² score, likelihood ratio (LR) test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Harrell concordance index (C-index) were adopted as criteria for assessing the predictive ability of each model.

Results

The optimal cut-off values for NPLN, LNR, and LODDS were 3, 0.28, and −0.37, respectively. N, NPLN, LNR, and LODDS were identified as independent prognostic predictors for CSS and OS in patients with SCC when each of them was incorporated into multivariable Cox model separately. Additionally, LODDS had the higher linear trend χ² score, higher LR χ² test score, lower AIC, and higher C-index compared to the other three systems. Moreover, a combination of N, NPLN, and LODDS was superior to any staging system alone for predicting prognosis.

Conclusions

LODDS showed better predictive performance than N, NPLN, and LNR among patients with node-positive SCC after surgery. A combination of LODDS and the current AJCC TNM classification has the potential for becoming a better staging method to more precisely predicting prognosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been gaining popularity with the emergence of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging. We aimed to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of SLNB using ICG for lung cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using search terms "lung/pulmonary" AND "tumor/carcinoma/cancer/neoplasm/adenocarcinoma/malignancy/squamous/carcinoid" AND "indocyanine green" was completed in June 2018. Articles were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) diagnostic accuracy study design; (2) ICG injected at the tumor site with near-infrared fluorescence imaging identification of sentinel lymph nodes; (3) lymphadenectomy or sampling was performed as the gold standard.

RESULTS

Eight primary studies were included with a total of 366 patients. 43.0% of patients were females and the mean tumor size was 2.3 cm. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified with ICG in 251 patients, yielding a pooled identification rate of 0.83 (0.67-0.94). A meta-analysis of seven studies computed a diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity, and specificity of 177.6 (45.6-691.1), 0.85 (0.71-0.94), and 1.00 (0.98-1.00), respectively. The summary receiver operator characteristic demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.963 (SE = 0.038) and a Q* of 0.91 (SE = 0.057).

CONCLUSION

Our review found suboptimal results for the diagnostic accuracy of SLNB using ICG and must be improved before routine clinical use. Further research is required to develop a robust protocol for the use SLNB with ICG for lung cancer.

Results of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in surgical resection of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer in a Chinese high-volume Center

PURPOSE

To investigate the short-term outcomes and long-term oncological efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for surgical treatment of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with open thoracotomy (OT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 1034 patients who underwent pulmonary resection and systemic lymph node dissection for pathological N2 NSCLC from September 2005 to December 2017 (536 patients in VATS group and 498 patients in OT group). Propensity score matching was applied to reduce the confounding effects. Factors affecting survival were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The VATS procedure was associated with shorter operative time compared with the OT procedure (147.96 ± 58.91 min vs. 165.34 ± 58.91 min, P < 0.001). No significant difference was identified between the two groups in the number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) and number of dissected MLNs stations. More patients after VATS procedure received postoperative adjuvant therapy (83.4% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.002). At a median follow-up of 36 (range 4-150) months, comparing VATS procedure and OT procedure, no significant differences were noted in 5-year DFS (20.7% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.89) and 5-year OS (30.7% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.821). The VATS procedure was not found to be an independent predictor of DFS (hazard ratio, 0.986; 95% CI, 0.809 to 1.202) or OS (hazard ratio, 0.977; 95% CI 0.802 to 1.191).

CONCLUSION

In this large propensity-matched comparison, the VATS procedure offered comparable short-term outcomes and long-term oncological efficacy for patients with pN2 NSCLC when compared with OT procedure.

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Switching from Thoracoscopic to Robotic Platform for Lobectomy: Report of Learning Curve and Outcome

OBJECTIVE

The optimal minimally invasive surgical management for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. For experienced video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) surgeons, the increased costs and learning curve are strong barriers for adoption of robotics. We examined the learning curve and outcome of an experienced VATS lobectomy surgeon switching to a robotic platform.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review to identify patients who underwent a robotic or VATS lobectomy for NSCLC from 2016 to 2018. Analysis of patient demographics, perioperative data, pathological upstaging rates, and robotic approach (RA) learning curve was performed.

RESULTS

This study evaluated 167 lobectomies in total, 118 by RA and 49 by VATS. Patient and tumor characteristics were similar. RA had significantly more lymph node harvested (14 versus 10; P = 0.004), more nodal stations sampled (5 versus 4; P < 0.001), and more N1 nodes (8 versus 6; P = 0.010) and N2 nodes (6 versus 4; P = 0.017) resected. With RA, 22 patients were upstaged (18.6%) compared to 5 patients (10.2%) with VATS (P = 0.26). No differences were found in perioperative outcome. Operative time decreased significantly with a learning curve of 20 cases, along with a steady increase in lymph node yield.

CONCLUSIONS

RA can be adopted safely by experienced VATS surgeons. Learning curve is 20 cases, with RA resulting in superior lymph node clearance compared to VATS. The potential improvement in upstaging and oncologic resection for NSCLC may justify the associated investments of robotics even for experienced VATS surgeons.

Minimizing residual occult nodal metastasis in NSCLC: recent advances, current status and controversies

Introduction: Nodal involvement in lung cancer is a significant determinant of prognosis and treatment management. New evidence exists regarding the management of occult lymph node metastasis and residual disease in the fields of imaging, mediastinal staging, and operative management.Areas covered: This review summarizes the latest body of knowledge on the identification and management of occult lymph node metastasis in NSCLC. We focus on tumor-specific characteristics; imaging modalities; invasive mediastinal staging; and operative management including, technique, degree of resection, and lymph node examination.Expert opinion: Newly identified risk-factors associated with nodal metastasis including tumor histology, location, radiologic features, and metabolic activity are not included in professional societal guidelines due to the heterogeneity of their reporting and uncertainty on how to adopt them into practice. Imaging as a sole diagnostic method is limited. We recommend confirmation with invasive mediastinal staging. EBUS-FNA is the best initial method, but adoption has not been uniform. The diagnostic algorithm is less certain for re-staging of mediastinal nodes after neoadjuvant therapy. Mediastinal node sampling during lobectomy remains the gold-standard, but evidence supports the use of minimally invasive techniques. More study is warranted regarding sublobar resection. No consensus exists regarding lymph node examination, but new evidence supports reexamination of current quality metrics.

Is less really more? Reexamining video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy in the setting of an enhanced recovery protocol

OBJECTIVES

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy has been associated with improved pain, length of stay, and outcomes compared with open lobectomy. However, enhanced recovery protocols improve outcomes after both procedures. We aimed to compare video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and open lobectomy in the setting of a comprehensive enhanced recovery protocol.

METHODS

All patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer at a single institution since the adoption of an enhanced recovery protocol (May 2016 to December 2018) were stratified by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open status and compared. Demographics and outcomes, including length of stay, daily pain scores, and short-term operative complications, were compared using standard univariate statistics and multivariable models.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients underwent lobectomy, including 71 (54.6%) undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and 59 (45.4%) undergoing open surgery. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open cases exhibited similar length of stay (median 4 days for both, P = .07), opioid requirement (33.2 vs 30.8 mg morphine equivalents, P = .86), and pain scores at 0, 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery (4.3 vs 2.8, P = .12; 4.4 vs 3.7, P = .27; 3.9 vs 3.5, P = .83; and 3.4 vs 3.5, P = .98, respectively). Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy exhibited lower rates of readmission (1.4% vs 17.0%, P < .01), postoperative transfusion requirement (0% vs 10.2%, P < .01), and pneumonia (1.4% vs 10.2%, P = .05). After risk adjustment, an open procedure (vs video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery status) did not significantly affect the length of stay (effect 0.18; P = .10) or overall complication rate (odds ratio, 1.9; P = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of a comprehensive enhanced recovery protocol, patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy exhibited similar short-term outcomes. Surgical incision may have less impact on outcomes in the setting of a comprehensive thoracic enhanced recovery protocol.

Predictors of nodal upstaging in patients with cT1-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results from the Italian VATS Group Registry

PURPOSE

Accurate staging of early non-small cell lung cancer is fundamental for selecting the best treatment. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for nodal upstaging after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for clinical T1-3N0 tumors.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2017, 3276 thoracoscopic lobectomies were recorded in the prospective database "Italian VATS Group". Linear and multiple logistic regression models were adapted to identify independent predictors of nodal upstaging and factors associated with progression in postoperative N status.

RESULTS

Nodal upstaging was found in 417 cases (12.7%), including 206 cases (6.2%) of N1-positive nodes, 81 cases of N2 nodes (2.4%), and 130 cases (4%) of involvement of both N1 + N2 nodes. A total of 241 (7.3%) patients had single-station nodal involvement, whereas 176 (5.3%) had multiple-station involvement. In the final regression model, the tumor grade, histology, pathologic T status, and > 12 resected nodes were independent predictors of nodal upstaging.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of resected lymph nodes seems to predict nodal upstaging better than the type of intraoperative lymph node management. Other preoperative risk factors correspond to those for which the current guidelines of the European Society of Thoracic Surgery recommend more extensive preoperative mediastinal staging.

Early outcomes of robotic versus uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a propensity score-matched study

OBJECTIVES

Both robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (UVATS) are minimally invasive surgical techniques used for treatment of lung cancer. However, no research studies comparing early outcomes between RATS and UVATS have been reported.

METHODS

Non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with RATS or UVATS at our institution from January 2015 to September 2016 were enrolled. Early outcomes were compared after propensity score-matched analysis using 4 factors: age, gender, tumour size and operative procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were included in this study: 76 patients underwent RATS and 77 patients underwent UVATS. After propensity score-matched analysis, each group included 69 cases. The comparison of the 2 groups showed that there were no significant differences in operative time, postoperative hospital stay, chest tube duration, analgesic usage, complications or the number of resected lymph nodes. However, RATS caused less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.037) and more dissected lymph node stations (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Judging from the short-term outcomes, both RATS and UVATS are safe and feasible for non-small-cell lung cancer treatment. In particular, RATS is better able to reduce bleeding and complete lymphadenectomy than UVATS.

Multicentric evaluation of the impact of central tumour location when comparing rates of N1 upstaging in patients undergoing video-assisted and open surgery for clinical Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer†

OBJECTIVES

Large retrospective series have indicated lower rates of cN0 to pN1 nodal upstaging after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) compared with open resections for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of our multicentre study was to investigate whether the presumed lower rate of N1 upstaging after VATS disappears after correction for central tumour location in a multivariable analysis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients operated for PET-CT based clinical Stage I NSCLC were selected from prospectively managed surgical databases in 11 European centres. Central tumour location was defined as contact with bronchovascular structures on computer tomography and/or visibility on standard bronchoscopy.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and ninety-five patients underwent pulmonary resection by VATS (n = 699, 9% conversions) or an open technique (n = 196) in 2014. Incidence of nodal pN1 and pN2 upstaging was 8% and 7% after VATS and 15% and 6% after open surgery, respectively. pN1 was found in 27% of patients with central tumours. Less central tumours were operated on by VATS compared with the open technique (12% vs 28%, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that only tumour location had a significant impact on N1 upstaging (OR 6.2, confidence interval 3.6-10.8; P < 0.001) and that the effect of surgical technique (VATS versus open surgery) was no longer significant when accounting for tumour location.

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of patients with central clinical Stage I NSCLC was upstaged to pN1 at resection. Central tumour location was the only independent factor associated with N1 upstaging, undermining the evidence for lower N1 upstaging after VATS resections. Studies investigating N1 upstaging after VATS compared with open surgery should be interpreted with caution due to possible selection bias, i.e. relatively more central tumours in the open group with a higher chance of N1 upstaging.

Long-term Outcome After Resection of Isolated Thoracic Lymph Node Metastases of Renal Cell Cancer

BACKGROUND

Isolated thoracic lymph node metastases (ITLNMs) without any lung metastases of renal cell cancer are rare. Other than a few case reports and one study, there is no further literature on ITLNMs. For this reason, the goal of this study was to analyze our experiences, the long-term survival outcomes, and recurrence-free survival outcomes after the resection of ITLNMs.

METHODS

We analyzed our database of 15 patients with ITLNMs who underwent metastasectomy by systematic lymph node dissection from 2003 to 2017. The long-term outcomes and survival curves were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The median disease-free interval between primary cancer and ITLNM was 40 months (range, 0-171 months). The R0 resection rate was 93.3% (n = 14). There was one R2 resection, which was due to a tracheal and left main bronchial infiltration. The postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 13.3% and 0%, respectively. Altogether, 14 patients were included in the long-term follow-up with a median follow-up time of 35.5 months (range, 2-108 months). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 93%, 73%, and 73%, respectively. The median overall progression-free survival after metastasectomy was 18 months (95% confidence interval, 8.6-27.4 months), and the 5-year local recurrence-free rate was 65%.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the long disease-free interval between primary cancer and ITLNM, a long oncologic follow-up that includes chest images should be mandatory. Altogether, metastasectomy of ITLNMs is feasible with low morbidity and mortality rates and might be associated with promising survival rates. Early detection and resection of ITLNMs may avoid severe complications.

Prevalence of Occult Peribronchial N1 Nodal Metastasis in Peripheral Clinical N0 Small (≤2 cm) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

There has been growing interest in limited resection and nonsurgical treatment for small lung cancers. We examined the pattern and rate of occult N1 nodal metastasis in patients with peripheral, small (≤2 cm), clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with peripheral small (≤2 cm) NSCLC with no evidence of locally advanced or metastatic disease (clinical T1a-b N0 M0, American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Cancer Staging Manual), who were deemed eligible for lobectomy or sublobar resection, were identified from preregistration eligibility screening logs for the Alliance/Cancer and Leukemia Group B 140503 trial at our institution. Pathologic outcomes were examined in all patients undergoing anatomic resection with mediastinal and hilar lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

Included were 58 patients treated between November 2014 and January 2017 who met the inclusion criteria: 51 underwent lobectomy, and 7 underwent segmentectomy. Mean tumor diameter on computed tomography was 1.5 cm, and mean positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value was 3.9. The mean consolidation-to-tumor ratio was 0.77. Occult nodal metastases in N1 stations were found in 8 of 58 patients (14%), and most of these nodes were found in interlobar or peribronchial stations (11 or 12). An additional 2 patients (3%) had occult positive N2 nodes. Overall, the false-negative rate for clinical staging was 16%.

CONCLUSIONS

Occult nodal disease was frequently identified in peripheral N1 stations (11-13) in patients with small (≤2 cm) clinical N0 NSCLC. Hilar lymphadenectomy is essential for accurate staging in the management of patients with small clinical N0 NSCLC.

Propensity-score adjusted comparison of pathologic nodal upstaging by robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of intraoperative lymph node (LN) staging by comparing upstaging between robotic-assisted surgery, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and open thoracotomy approach for lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1053 patients with clinical stage N0/N1 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lobectomy at 2 centers between 2011 and 2018. Propensity score adjustment by inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary end point was LN upstaging.

RESULTS

A total of 911 patients (254 robotic, 296 VATS, and 261 open) were included in the inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted analysis. The overall rate of LN upstaging was highest with open lobectomy (21.8%), followed by robotic (16.2%), and VATS (12.3%) (P = .03). Mediastinal N2 upstaging was observed in similar frequencies (open 6.9% vs robotic 6.3% vs VATS 4.4%; P = .6). No differences were seen for total LN counts, but were observed in the number of stations sampled (mean, open 4.0 vs robotic 3.8 vs VATS 3.6; P = .001). On multivariate analysis, LN upstaging was lower for VATS compared with open (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.85), but not different between robotic and open (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.18). No significant differences were seen in mediastinal N2 upstaging between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologic LN upstaging following lobectomy for clinically N0/N1 NSCLC remains high. Compared with a traditional thoracotomy approach, robotic lobectomy was associated with similar and VATS with lower overall nodal upstaging. A thorough evaluation of hilar and mediastinal LNs remains critical to ensure accurate staging by detection of occult LN metastases.

Optimal Approach to Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy was introduced over 25 years ago. More recently, the technique has been modified from a multiport video-assisted thoracic surgery (mVATS) to uniportal (uVATS) and robotic (rVATS), with proponents for each approach. Additionally most lobectomies are still performed using an open approach. We sought to provide evidence-based recommendations to help define the optimal surgical approach to lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis of articles searched without limits from January 2000 to January 2018 comparing open, mVATS, uVATS, and rVATS using sources Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were considered for inclusion. Articles were individually scrutinized by ISMICS consensus conference members, and evidence-based statements were created and consensus processes were used to determine the ensuing recommendations. The ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendation Classification system was used to assess the overall quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.

Results and recommendations

One hundred and forty-five studies met the predefined inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Comparisons were analyzed between VATS and open, and between different VATS approaches looking at oncological outcomes (survival, recurrence, lymph node evaluation), safety (adverse events), function (pain, quality of life, pulmonary function), and cost-effectiveness. Fifteen statements addressing these areas achieved consensus. The highest level of evidence suggested that mVATS is preferable to open lobectomy with lower adverse events (36% versus 42%; 88,460 patients) and less pain (IIa recommendation). Our meta-analysis suggested that overall survival was better (IIb) with mVATS compared with open (71.5% versus 66.7% 5-years; 16,200 patients). Different VATS approaches were similar for most outcomes, although uVATS may be associated with less pain and analgesic requirements (IIb).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis supports the role of VATS lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Apart from potentially less pain and analgesic requirement with uVATS, different minimally invasive surgical approaches appear to have similar outcomes.

Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the enhanced dexterity and visualization of the surgical robot lessens morbidity and influences staging or survival. We compared outcomes of robotic-assisted lobectomy (RAL) with thoracoscopic video-assisted lobectomy (VAL) or open lobectomy (OL) of non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Using a prospective surgical database, perioperative and cancer-related outcomes of patients who received a lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer from 2011 to 2017 were analyzed. Outcomes between each surgical approach were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting generated from the inverse of the propensity score.

RESULTS

There were 831 patients: 106 RAL, 301 VAL, and 424 OL. More RAL patients than VAL received neoadjuvant therapy (16% vs 6%, P = .001), but less than OL (28% vs 16%, P = .014). After adjustment, RAL was associated with longer operative times, less blood loss, and improved nodal harvest (all P < .02). There were no differences in morbidity, nodal upstaging, or mortality between surgical approaches. Length of stay was shorter with RAL vs OL (P < .01). Unadjusted cost was higher after RAL vs VAL (P = .003), but after adjustment, cost differences disappeared.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted lobectomy was associated with improved nodal harvest and less blood loss as compared with VAL or OL. Length of stay was shorter with RAL as opposed to OL. Unexpectedly, cost was not higher with RAL. The profile of patients who received RAL more closely approximated OL, suggesting RAL may allow typical thoracotomy patients to receive minimally invasive surgery after adequate training and experience.

Evaluation of adherence to the Commission on Cancer lung cancer quality measures

OBJECTIVE

In this study we present historic data on adherence to and survival outcomes associated with recently introduced quality measures for the management of non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried to identify all patients with non-small-cell lung cancer from 1998 to 2011. Adherence to guidelines was assessed for each of 3 Commission on Cancer-defined quality measures: (1) sampling 10 regional lymph nodes at surgery; (2a) surgery within 120 days of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or, (2b) 180 days of adjuvant chemotherapy; and (3) nonsurgical primary therapy in cN2 disease. The likelihood of measure adherence and the association of measure adherence with all-cause mortality were analyzed controlling for patient, hospital, and time period characteristics.

RESULTS

Regional lymph node sampling was inadequate in 72.7% of cases. Only 28.7% began adjuvant chemotherapy within 180 days of surgery. However, 96.5% of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy proceeded to surgery within 120 days and surgery was first-line treatment for cN2 disease in only 3.7% of patients. Uninsured or Medicaid status was an independent risk factor for a prolonged delay between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.72) and surgery and adjuvant treatment (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-2.19). Overall survival was significantly better in patients whose care conformed to quality standards for nodal sampling (measure 1), and timing of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence rates for nodal sampling at the time of surgery and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were low. These findings highlight opportunities for improvement efforts, but more measures are needed to more broadly assess the quality of lung cancer care.

Predictive risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer: a case control study

Background

Estimation of lymph node status is essential in order to determine precise therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Furthermore, lymph node involvement is a very powerful prognostic factor in these patients. In this analysis, we aim to evaluate the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in NSCLC-patients.

Methods

In a prospectively-established database, we analyzed all data of patients with NSCLC, who underwent oncological surgical resections from 01/2007 to 12/2016, retrospectively. The correlation between clinicopathological parameters and lymph node metastasis was investigated by using univariate and binary logistic regression analysis.

Results

In this study, we operated on 204 consecutive patients, 142 men (71.7%) and 56 women (28.3%). Lymph node metastases were detected in 38.2% (78/204). Preoperatively, central tumor localization (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.3–5.1, P = 0.005) and tumor size > 3 cm (OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.3–4.4, P = 0.005) were found to be significant predictive factors for lymph node metastasis. Postoperatively, multivariate analysis showed that intratumoral lymph vessel invasion (L1-status) (OR = 17.3, 95% CI = 5.1–58.4, P <  0.001) along with the central tumor localization (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.4–5.8, P = 0.004) were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. In small size tumors (≤3 cm), two predictive factors for lymph node metastasis were found: central tumor localization (OR = 19.4, 95% = 2.1–186.4, P = 0.01) and L1-status (OR = 43.9, 95% CI = 3.6–529.4, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

A precise pre- and intraoperative assessment of the lymph node status is essential in patients with larger sized tumors and central localization. Furthermore, L1-status is a highly significant risk factor for lymph node metastasis in NSCLC-Patients. Therefore, an adjuvant therapy in patients with L1-status and pNX category should be considered.

Nodal upstaging evaluation in NSCLC patients treated by robotic lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Open pulmonary resection is considered the gold standard treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in the last decades, the use of minimal-invasive techniques has given promising results. Survival in lung cancer, after surgery, depends on the number of pathological nodes (pN), thus lymph nodal upstaging can be considered a surrogate for surgical quality of the procedure. Several studies have demonstrated a lower rate of upstaging in video-assisted thoracic surgery than in open surgery, suggesting an approach-related difference in lymphadenectomy. Features of robotic technique could consent a lymph nodal dissection similar to open surgery. The aim of the study is to compare nodal upstaging between thoracotomy and robotic approaches to evaluate the oncologic radicality.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2016, 212 consecutive cN0 NSCLC patients underwent lobectomy and lymphadenectomy (N1 + N2 stations) by either thoracotomy (Open Group) or robotic surgery (Robotic Group).

RESULTS

Lobectomy and lymphadenectomy were performed in 106 cN0-cN1 NSCLC patients by robotic surgery and in 106 cN0-cN1 NSCLC patients by open surgery. A mean of 14.42 ± 6.99 lymph nodes was removed in the Robotic Group (RG) and a mean of 14.32 ± 7.34 nodes in the Open Group (OG). Nodal upstaging was observed in 22 (20.75%) RG patients and in 19 OG (17.92%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic lobectomy for clinical N0-N1 NSCLC appears to be equivalent to thoracotomy in terms of efficacy of lymph node dissection and nodal upstaging. Given that the nodal upstaging is a surrogate of quality of surgery, we can consider robotic lobectomy an appropriate procedure which ensures similar result to the open approach.

Video assisted thoracic surgery vs. thoracotomy for locally advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Surgery is an important part of multidisciplinary treatment strategy for locally advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), but insufficient evidence supports the feasibility and safety of video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced LSCC. This study aims to compare perioperative data and long-term survival of locally advanced LSCC patients between VATS and thoracotomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical and pathological information of patients with locally advanced LSCC who underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from October 2013 to October 2017. All patients were divided into two groups (thoracotomy and VATS) and were compared the differences in perioperative, oncological and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were analyzed in this study (67 thoracotomy and 14 VATS). VATS provided less postoperative pain (P = 0.005) and produced less volume of chest drainage (P = 0.019) than thoracotomy, but the number of resected lymph nodes was less in VATS group (P = 0.011). However, there was no significant difference in the number of resected lymph node stations and the rate of nodal upstaging between two groups. The mean disease free survival (DFS) was 32.7 ± 2.7 months for the thoracotomy group and 31.8 ± 3.0 months for the VATS group (P = 0.335); the corresponding overall survival (OS) was 41.7 ± 2.2 months and 36.4 ± 4.1 months (P = 0.925).

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with locally advanced LSCC, VATS played a positive role in postoperative recovery and associated similar survival outcome compared with thoracotomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Left mediastinal node dissection after arterial ligament transection via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for potentially advanced stage I non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Left mediastinal node dissection during lung cancer surgery can be difficult because paratracheal and subcarinal lymph nodes are concealed by mediastinal structures. Arterial ligament transection (ALT) offers a wide surgical view of concealed mediastinal spaces, thus enabling extended en bloc lymph node dissection (LND). We analyzed surgical outcomes of patients who underwent extended LND after ALT via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for potentially node-positive clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the medical records of 75 patients who had undergone extended mediastinal node dissection after ALT via VATS for potentially node-positive NSCLC at our centers during the period from September 2008 through November 2015. Operative data and rates of overall survival (OS), in addition to mortality and morbidity, were analyzed in relation pathological stage and nodal stage.

RESULTS

Operative time was 238±58 minutes, and an average of 32.7±12.9 hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes were dissected. Lymph node metastases were detected in 34 patients (6 pN1 patients, 27 pN2 patients, and 1 pN3 patient). Mediastinal lymph node metastases were detected around the carina (stations 2L, 4L, and 7) in 19 of 27 patients with pN2 cancer. Nineteen patients had a total of 24 postoperative complications. Recurrent nerve paralysis was the most frequent complication (n=11) but resolved in eight patients during follow-up. Survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 92.2%/88.4%, 100.0%/60.0%, and 87.7%/81.0% for p-stage I, II, and III, respectively, and 92.2%/88.4%, 100.0%/60.0%, and 87.4%/80.7% for pN0, pN1, and pN2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended mediastinal node dissection after ALT allowed detection of lymph node micrometastases in selected patients with potentially node-positive left NSCLC and may improve outcomes.