Blood Pressure Control in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Efficacy and Impact on Adverse Events

Modelling blood flow in the circle of Willis in continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: possible relevance to strokes

Purpose

Despite significant improvements in the design and performance of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CFLVADs), one of the most important reasons hampering further penetration of this technology is the occurrence of adverse events, especially strokes. One of the well-known risk factors for strokes is hypertension which is particularly common in patients undergoing a CFLVAD implant. While the device is implanted in the heart, strokes happen due to pathology in the brain and we hypothesised that modelling the blood flow in the circle of Willis might shed light on the causation of strokes in this situation.The aim of the study was two-fold:1. What is the reason for hypertension in CFLVADs? Are there physical factors at play, besides neurohumoral mechanisms?2. Do anatomical factors in the circle of Willis play a role in the causation of strokes in these patients?

Methods

The circle of Willis is often incomplete and has a number of anatomical variations, the commonest being the absence of the posterior communicating artery. Hypertension is common after CFLVAD implantation and is also a well-known risk factor for strokes. We examined the blood pressure in the cerebral circulation with pulsatile and non-pulsatile flow for identical conditions and the effect of the absence of the posterior communicating artery on regional cerebral blood flow and pressure. One-dimensional blood flow model was used, taking into account wave propagation and reflections and physiological data obtained from anatomically detailed arterial network (ADAN86) which has data from 86 arteries including detailed cerebral network.

Results

The mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in the non-pulsatile blood flow of CFLVADs compared to pulsatile flow, for identical conditions, across all arteries. With increasing imparted pulsatility to CFLVAD flow, the mean arterial pressure progressively decreased. Isolated absence of the posterior communicating artery had no effect on the flow as well as pressure in the middle cerebral artery. However, when combined with the absence of flow in the ipsilateral carotid artery, the flow as well as the pressure decreased very significantly in both continuous and pulsatile flow situations.

Conclusions

Physiologically significant pulsatility in CFLVADs can have important clinical advantages in lowering of blood pressure which can lead to lower incidence of strokes, pump thrombosis, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds, and aortic incompetence. Patient-specific anatomical variations in the circle of Willis, especially the absence of the posterior communicating artery, can have important consequences in regional cerebral perfusion under some circumstances.

Graphical abstract

Quality of Anticoagulation With Phenprocoumon and Warfarin in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: A Multicenter Study

VISUAL ABSTRACT

of key results. INR, international normalized ratio; TTR, time in therapeutic range; PTR, percentage of tests in range; HRAE, hemocompatibility-related adverse event; FFUV, first follow-up visit; GIB, gastrointestinal bleeding; HR, hazard ratio.http://links.lww.com/ASAIO/A961.

Neurologic Complications in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use has revolutionised the care of patients with advanced heart failure, allowing more patients to survive until heart transplantation and providing improved quality for patients unable to undergo transplantation. Despite these benefits, improvements in device technology, and better clinical care and experience, LVADs are associated with neurologic complications. This review provides information on the incidence, risk factors, and management of neurologic complications among LVAD patients. Although scant guidelines exist for the evaluation and management of neurologic complications in LVAD patients, a high index of suspicion can prompt early detection of neurologic complications which may improve overall neurologic outcomes. A better understanding of the implications of continuous circulatory flow on systemic and cerebral vasculature is necessary to reduce the common occurrence of neurologic complications in this population.

Validity and success rate of noninvasive mean arterial blood pressure measurements in cf-LVAD patients: A technical review

BACKGROUND

The life expectancy of patients with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) is increasing. Adequate determination and regulation of mean arterial pressure (MAP) is important to prevent adverse events. Given the low pulsatility characteristics in these patients, standard blood pressure equipment is inadequate to monitor MAP and not recommended. We provide an overview of currently available noninvasive techniques, using an extensive search strategy in three online databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar) to find validation studies using invasive intra-arterial blood pressure measurement as a reference. Mean differences with the reference values smaller than 5 ± 8 mm Hg were considered acceptable.

OBSERVATIONS

After deduplication, screening, and exclusion of incorrect sources, eleven studies remained with 3139 successful MAP measurements in 386 patients. Four noninvasive techniques, using Doppler, pulse oximetry, finger cuff volume clamp, or slow upper arm cuff deflation, were identified and evaluated for validity and success rate in cf-LVAD patients. Here, a comprehensive technical background of the blood pressure measurement methods is provided in combination with a clinical use comparison. Of the reported noninvasive techniques, slow cuff devices performed most optimally (mean difference 1.3 ± 5.2 mm Hg).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are encouraging and indicate that noninvasive blood pressure monitoring options with acceptable validity and success rate are available. Further technical development and validation is warranted for the growing population of patients on long-term cf-LVAD support.

Arterial Compliance and Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Pump Function

Durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (cfLVADs) demonstrate superior survival, cardiac functional status, and overall quality of life compared to medical therapy alone in advanced heart failure. Previous studies have not considered the impact arterial compliance may have on pump performance or developed arterial pressure. This study assessed the impact of alterations in arterial compliance, preload, and afterload on continuous-flow pump function and measured hemodynamics using an in-vitro pulsatile mock circulatory loop. Decreased arterial compliance was associated with a significant increase in arterial pressure pulsatility which was not evident in the flow pulsatility, as displayed in pump flow waveforms. There were marked changes in the pump flow waveforms due to the significant alteration in the aortoventricular gradient during diastole according to the changes in compliance. This study demonstrates that changes in systemic blood pressure, afterload, and left ventricular contractility each significantly affects the flow waveform. The association of hypertension with lower aortic compliance results in markedly decreased diastolic flow rates which may be important in contributing to a greater risk of adverse events under cfLVAD support.

Contemporary Drug Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

The introduction of multiple new pharmacological agents over the past three decades in the field of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has led to reduced rates of mortality and hospitalizations, and consequently the prevalence of HFrEF has increased, and up to 10% of patients progress to more advanced stages, characterized by high rates of mortality, hospitalizations, and poor quality of life. Advanced HFrEF patients often show persistent or progressive signs of severe HF symptoms corresponding to New York Heart Association class III or IV despite being on optimal medical, surgical, and device therapies. However, a subpopulation of patients with advanced HF, those with the most advanced stages of disease, were often insufficiently represented in the major trials demonstrating efficacy and tolerability of the drugs used in HFrEF due to exclusion criteria such as low BP and kidney dysfunction. Consequently, the results of many landmark trials cannot necessarily be transferred to patients with the most advanced stages of HFrEF. Thus, the efficacy and tolerability of guideline-directed medical therapies in patients with the most advanced stages of HFrEF often remain unsettled, and this knowledge is of crucial importance in the planning and timing of consideration for referral for advanced therapies. This review discusses the evidence regarding the use of contemporary drugs in the advanced HFrEF population, covering components such as guideline HFrEF drugs, diuretics, inotropes, and the use of HFrEF drugs in LVAD recipients, and provides suggestions on how to manage guideline-directed therapy in this patient group.

Physiology of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

The expanding use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) for end-stage heart failure warrants familiarity with the physiologic interaction of the device with the native circulation. Contemporary devices utilize predominantly centrifugal flow and, to a lesser extent, axial flow rotors that vary with respect to their intrinsic flow characteristics. Flow can be manipulated with adjustments to preload and afterload as in the native heart, and ascertainment of the predicted effects is provided by differential pressure-flow (H-Q) curves or loops. Valvular heart disease, especially aortic regurgitation, may significantly affect adequacy of mechanical support. In contrast, atrioventricular and ventriculoventricular timing is of less certain significance. Although beneficial effects of device therapy are typically seen due to enhanced distal perfusion, unloading of the left ventricle and atrium, and amelioration of secondary pulmonary hypertension, negative effects of CF-LVAD therapy on right ventricular filling and function, through right-sided loading and septal interaction, can make optimization challenging. Additionally, a lack of pulsatile energy provided by CF-LVAD therapy has physiologic consequences for end-organ function and may be responsible for a series of adverse effects. Rheological effects of intravascular pumps, especially shear stress exposure, result in platelet activation and hemolysis, which may result in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic consequences. Development of novel solutions for untoward device-circulatory interactions will facilitate hemodynamic support while mitigating adverse events. © 2021 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:1-37, 2021.

Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology position paper on the management of left ventricular assist device-supported patients for the non-left ventricular assist device specialist healthcare provider: Part 2: at the emergency department

The improvement in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology and scarcity of donor hearts have increased dramatically the population of the LVAD‐supported patients and the probability of those patients to present to the emergency department with expected and non‐expected device‐related and patient–device interaction complications. The ageing of the LVAD‐supported patients, mainly those supported with the ‘destination therapy’ indication, increases the risk for those patients to suffer from other co‐morbidities common in the older population. In this second part of the trilogy on the management of LVAD‐supported patients for the non‐LVAD specialist healthcare provider, definitions and structured approach to the LVAD‐supported patient presenting to the emergency department with bleeding, neurological event, pump thrombosis, chest pain, syncope, and other events are presented. The very challenging issue of declaring death in an LVAD‐supported patient, as the circulation is artificially preserved by the device despite no other signs of life, is also discussed in detail.

Guidance on the management of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider: executive summary

The accepted use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology as a good alternative for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure together with the improved survival of patients on the device and the scarcity of donor hearts has significantly increased the population of LVAD supported patients. Device-related, and patient-device interaction complications impose a significant burden on the medical system exceeding the capacity of LVAD implanting centres. The probability of an LVAD supported patient presenting with medical emergency to a local ambulance team, emergency department medical team and internal or surgical wards in a non-LVAD implanting centre is increasing. The purpose of this paper is to supply the immediate tools needed by the non-LVAD specialized physician - ambulance clinicians, emergency ward physicians, general cardiologists, and internists - to comply with the medical needs of this fast-growing population of LVAD supported patients. The different issues discussed will follow the patient's pathway from the ambulance to the emergency department, and from the emergency department to the internal or surgical wards and eventually back to the general practitioner.

A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factor, Mechanism, and Management of Left Ventricular Assist Device-Associated Stroke

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has been increasing in the last decade, along with the number of patients with advanced heart failure refractory to medical therapy. Ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage remain the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in LVAD patients. Despite the common occurrence and the significant outcome impact, underlying mechanisms and management strategies of stroke in LVAD patients are controversial. In this article, we review our current knowledge on pathophysiology and risk factors of LVAD-associated stroke, outline the diagnostic approach, and discuss treatment strategies.

Phentolamine continuous infusion in a pediatric patient with uncontrolled hypertension

PURPOSE

A case of uncontrolled hypertension nonresponsive to traditional pharmacologic management in a pediatric patient with a ventricular assist device awaiting a heart transplant is reported.

SUMMARY

A 4-month-old male in heart failure was experiencing uncontrolled hypertension. Because of a lack of hemodynamic stability, he was unable to be listed as a heart transplant candidate. He received multiple antihypertensive agents (calcium channel blockers, β-blockers, and direct-acting vasodilators) as both intermittent and continuous infusions over the course of several days without achieving normotension. The decision was then made to administer intravenous phentolamine as a continuous infusion to pursue a different mechanism than with traditional antihypertensive agents to achieve hemodynamic stability. Within 8 hours of initiation of the continuous phentolamine infusion, the patient became normotensive and was listed for a heart transplant. The continuous phentolamine infusion was administered over the next 4 days to maintain normotension, and on day 4 the patient underwent successful orthotopic heart transplantation.

CONCLUSION

A 4-month-old male in heart failure with a ventricular assist device, experiencing uncontrolled hypertension nonresponsive to traditional pharmacologic management, was successfully treated with a continuous intravenous infusion of phentolamine.

Evaluation of clinically relevant operating conditions for left ventricular assist device investigations

Standardized boundary conditions for flow rate and pressure difference are currently not available for the development and certification process of ventricular assist devices. Thus, interdisciplinary studies lack comparability and quantitative assessment. Universally valid boundary conditions could be used for the application of numerical and experimental investigations and the approval procedure of ventricular assist devices. In order to define such boundaries, physiological data from INCOR^® patients were evaluated. A total of 599 out of possible 627 ventricular assist device patients were analyzed regarding their cardiac demands of flow rate and pressure head. An analysis of long-term data was performed, in order to provide respective, static mean values for benchmark testing. Furthermore, the short-term data of 188 patients delivered field data-based dynamic flow and pressure curves. The results of the study revealed physiologically reasonable boundary conditions, which can be applied in numerical or experimental investigations of ventricular assist devices. For steady flow analysis, single values for flow rate (4.46 L/min) and pressure head (62 mmHg) are suggested. For the support of pulsatile and unsteady flow studies, seven typical patients and one representative dynamic curve for flow rate and pressure head are proposed.The standardized results provided in this article, can be used in favor of interdisciplinary comparability of future numerical computations or in vitro ventricular assist device tests in research, development, and approval.

Cardiac Emergencies in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices are frequently used for management of patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Although technologic advancements have contributed to improved outcomes, several complications arise over time. These complications result from several factors, including medication effects, physiologic responses to chronic exposure to circulatory support that is minimally/entirely nonpulsatile, and dysfunction of the device itself. Clinical presentation can range from chronic and indolent to acute, life-threatening emergencies. Several areas of uncertainty exist regarding best practices for managing complications; however, growing awareness has led to development of new guidelines to reduce risk and improve outcomes.

Pulse assessment is important with blood pressure measurement in individuals with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices

While Doppler and cuff blood pressure techniques are prevalent methods of assessing blood pressure in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices, the impact of pulsatility on measurement is not well established. Retrospective chart analysis of clinical variables including pulse perception, blood pressure (Doppler and standard cuff), and aortic valve opening on echo at clinic visit were abstracted. Stable outpatients on continuous flow left ventricular assist devices support with concomitant portable echo assessment were included. Mean average difference was calculated and Pearson's correlation performed for all those patients who had both Doppler and cuff pressure obtained. In all, 74 Heartmate-II patients with a median time from implant of 380 days were analyzed. A pulse was perceived in 82% of patients with persistent aortic valve opening on portable echo and also in 30% of those who had a persistently closed aortic valve. The mean average difference between the Doppler and systolic cuff pressure was ~13 mmHg (r = 0.5, p = 0.004) when a pulse was present and ~11 mmHg when aortic valve was open (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001). Pulse presence seems to reflect aortic valve opening a majority of the time but not always. In the presence of a prominent pulse or persistent aortic valve opening, the Doppler pressure seems to be more reflective of a systolic pressure than mean perfusion pressure. Hence, assessment of pulsatility needs to be incorporated into blood pressure measurement methods for patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.

[Recommendations for emergency management of patients with permanent mechanical circulatory support : Consensus statement of DGTHG, DIVI, DGIIN, DGAI, DGINA, DGfK and DGK]

The prevalence of patients living with long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is rapidly increasing due to improved technology, improved survival, reduced adverse event profiles, greater reliability and mechanical durability, and limited numbers of organs available for donation. Patients with long-term MCS are very likely to require emergency medical support due to MCS-associated complications (e.g., right heart failure, left ventricular assist device malfunction, hemorrhage and pump thrombosis) but also due to non-MCS-associated conditions. Because of the unique characteristics of mechanical support, management of these patients is complicated and there is very little literature on emergency care for these patients. The purpose of this national scientific statement is to present consensus-based recommendations for the initial evaluation and resuscitation of adult patients with long-term MCS.

Mechanical circulatory support in children: past, present and future

Rapid advances in the field of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) have dramatically changed the management of pediatric patients with heart failure. There is now emphasis on timely implantation of ventricular assist devices (VADs) to preserve or recover end-organ function, and increased focus on post-implant management to improve the stroke rate. Transplant waitlist mortality has significantly decreased in the era of VAD use. Devices approved for adults are being used off-label in children with excellent outcomes, allowing chronic therapy and discharge home to become part of pediatric VAD therapy.

2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support

Long-term mechanical circulatory support (LT-MCS) is an important treatment modality for patients with severe heart failure. Different devices are available, and many-sometimes contradictory-observations regarding patient selection, surgical techniques, perioperative management and follow-up have been published. With the growing expertise in this field, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) recognized a need for a structured multidisciplinary consensus about the approach to patients with LT-MCS. However, the evidence published so far is insufficient to allow for generation of meaningful guidelines complying with EACTS requirements. Instead, the EACTS presents an expert opinion in the LT-MCS field. This expert opinion addresses patient evaluation and preoperative optimization as well as management of cardiac and non-cardiac comorbidities. Further, extensive operative implantation techniques are summarized and evaluated by leading experts, depending on both patient characteristics and device selection. The faculty recognized that postoperative management is multidisciplinary and includes aspects of intensive care unit stay, rehabilitation, ambulatory care, myocardial recovery and end-of-life care and mirrored this fact in this paper. Additionally, the opinions of experts on diagnosis and management of adverse events including bleeding, cerebrovascular accidents and device malfunction are presented. In this expert consensus, the evidence for the complete management from patient selection to end-of-life care is carefully reviewed with the aim of guiding clinicians in optimizing management of patients considered for or supported by an LT-MCS device.

The Rehabilitation of Patients With Advanced Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement: A Narrative Review

Because more patients with advanced heart failure are receiving a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy or a bridge to transplantation, there is increasing attention on functional outcomes and quality of life after LVAD implantation. Rehabilitation providers in the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting increasingly will treat patients with an LVAD and should understand the exercise physiology, medical management, rehabilitation considerations, and outcomes after rehabilitation for patients with an LVAD. The purpose of this article is to provide the physiatrist with a comprehensive understanding of the rehabilitation of patients with advanced heart failure and LVAD implantation. Changes in relevant organ system physiology and exercise physiology after LVAD are summarized. Safety of rehabilitation and program considerations for acute inpatient rehabilitation are reviewed. Recommendations for medical management and prevention of secondary complications seen in patients with an LVAD are outlined. A discussion of outcomes after acute inpatient rehabilitation, the dual diagnosis of stroke and LVAD placement, and long-term cognitive, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes after LVAD placement is presented.

Systemic blood pressure trends and antihypertensive utilization following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: an analysis of the interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support

Background

Elevated systemic blood pressure (SBP) has been linked to complications in Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs), including stroke and pump thrombosis. We queried Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) to describe the response of SBP to CF-LVAD implantation and to delineate contemporary trends in antihypertensive (AH) utilization for patients with these pumps.

Methods

We identified all CF-LVAD implantations in patients older than 18 years from 2006-2014, excluding those whose durations were less than 30 days. Pre-implant patient demographics and characteristics were obtained for each record. SBPs [i.e., mean arterial pressures (MAPs)], AH-use data, and vital status were tabulated, extending up to 5 years following implantation.

Results

A total of 10,329 CF-LVAD implantations were included for study. Post-implant, SBPs increased rapidly during the first 3 months but plateaued thereafter; AH utilization mirrored this trend. By 6 months, mean MAPs climbed 12.2% from 77.6 mmHg (95% CI: 77.4-77.8) pre-implantation to 87.1 mmHg (95% CI: 86.7-87.4) and patients required a mean of 1.8 AH medications (95% CI: 1.75-1.78) -a 125% increase from AH use at 1-week post-implantation (0.8 AHs/patient, 95% CI: 0.81-0.83) but a 5.3% decrease from pre-implant utilization (1.9 AHs/patient, 95% CI: 1.90-1.92). Once medication changes stabilized, the most common AH regimens were lone beta blockade (15%, n=720) and a beta blocker plus an ACE inhibitor (14%, n=672).

Conclusions

SBP rises rapidly after CF-LVAD implantation, stabilizing after 3 months, and is matched by concomitant changes in AH utilization; this AH use has increased over consecutive implant years.

Risk of stroke early after implantation of a left ventricular assist device

OBJECTIVE

Stroke is one of the major adverse events after left ventricular assist device implantation. Risk of stroke is the highest immediately after left ventricular assist device implantation and then increases again in chronic periods. There is no study that has analyzed risk factors for stroke in acute phase. We investigated the risk factors for stroke in the acute phase after left ventricular assist device implantation in the present study.

METHODS

Between October 2005 and December 2016, 158 consecutive patients (mean age, 43 ± 14 years; 34% were women) underwent continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (50 HeartMate II [Abbott Medical, Abbott Park, Ill], 38 DuraHeart [Terumo Heart, Ann Arbor, Mich], 33 Jarvik2000 [Jarvik Heart, New York, NY], 23 EVAHEART [Sun Medical, Moriyama City, Japan], 14 HeartWare [Framingham, Mass]) implantation in our institution. We analyzed the risk factors for a symptomatic stroke within 90 days after left ventricular assist device implantation.

RESULTS

Stroke occurred in 28 patients in the acute phase after left ventricular assist device implantation. Multivariate analysis revealed that low cardiac output (odds ratio, 0.25; 0.07-0.92; P = .024) during postoperative 12 to 24 hours was the only independent risk factor for stroke in the acute phase. Patients with stroke in the acute phase had higher serum lactate dehydrogenase levels at any point until postoperative 14 days. Patients with the HeartMate II device particularly showed a statistically significant negative relationship between cardiac output during postoperative 12 to 24 hours and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels at postoperative 14 days (r = -0.313, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that patients with perioperative lower cardiac output and higher lactate dehydrogenase level developed stroke in the acute phase after left ventricular assist device implantation. These results suggested that maintenance of sufficient left ventricular assist device flow is important in prevention of stroke, which may be related to subclinical pump thrombosis.

Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Designed for Patients With Heart Failure Supported with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

The gold standard for noninvasive blood pressure (BP) measurement, the Doppler technique, does not provide systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and may limit therapy outcomes. To improve patient care, we tested specifically designed experimental BP (ExpBP) monitor and the Doppler technique by comparing noninvasive measures to the intraarterial (I-A) BP in 31 patients with end-stage heart failure (4 females) 2.6 ± 3.4 days post-LVAD implantation (20 HeartMate II and 11 HeartWare). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the ExpBP monitor overestimated mean arterial pressure (MAP) by 1.2 (4.8) mm Hg (mean difference [standard deviation]), whereas the Doppler by 6.7 (5.8) mm Hg. The ExpBP SBP was overestimated by 0.8 (6.1) mm Hg and DBP by 1.9 (5.3) mm Hg compared with the respective I-A pressures. Both techniques achieved similar measurement reliability. In the measurement "success rate" expressed as a frequency (percent) of readable BP values per measurement attempts, Doppler accomplished 100% vs. 97%, 97%, and 94% of successful detections of MAP, SBP, and DBP provided by the ExpBP monitor. The ExpBP monitor demonstrated higher accuracy in the MAP assessment than the Doppler in addition to providing SBP and DBP in majority of subjects. Improved BP control may help to mitigate related neurologic adverse event rates.

Prevention and Treatment of Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Complications in Patients Supported by Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe the current knowledge in prevention and treatment of thrombotic (pump thrombosis and ischemic stroke) and bleeding (gastrointestinal and hemorrhagic stroke) complications in patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are now widely used for the management of end-stage heart failure. Unfortunately, in spite of the indisputable positive impact LVADs have on patients, the frequency and severity of complications are limitations of this therapy. Stroke, pump thrombosis, and gastrointestinal bleeding are among the most serious and frequent complications in these patients. The balance between hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in patients supported with CF-LVAD is difficult as most patients do not necessarily fit a "bleeder" or a "clotter" profile but rather move from one side to the other of the thrombotic/bleeding spectrum. Further research is necessary to better understand the risk factors and mechanisms involved in the development of these complications.

Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Lifelong Support

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have revolutionized advanced heart failure care. These compact, fully implantable heart pumps are capable of providing meaningful increases in survival, functional capacity, and quality of life. Implantation volumes continue to grow, but several challenges remain to be overcome before LVADs will be considered as the therapy of choice for all patients with advanced heart failure. They must be able to consistently extend survival for the long term (7 to 10 years), rather than the midterm (3 to 5 years) more typical of contemporary devices; they must incorporate design elements that reduce shear stress and avoid stasis to reduce the frequent adverse events of bleeding, stroke, and pump thrombosis; and they must become more cost-effective. The advancements in engineering, implantation technique, and medical management detailed in this review will highlight the progress made toward achieving lifelong LVAD support and the challenges that remain.

Pulse Oximeter Derived Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients With a Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device

Currently, blood pressure (BP) measurement is obtained noninvasively in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) by placing a Doppler probe over the brachial or radial artery with inflation and deflation of a manual BP cuff. We hypothesized that replacing the Doppler probe with a finger-based pulse oximeter can yield BP measurements similar to the Doppler derived mean arterial pressure (MAP). We conducted a prospective study consisting of patients with contemporary continuous flow LVADs. In a small pilot phase I inpatient study, we compared direct arterial line measurements with an automated blood pressure (ABP) cuff, Doppler and pulse oximeter derived MAP. Our main phase II study included LVAD outpatients with a comparison between Doppler, ABP, and pulse oximeter derived MAP. A total of five phase I and 36 phase II patients were recruited during February-June 2014. In phase I, the average MAP measured by pulse oximeter was closer to arterial line MAP rather than Doppler (P = 0.06) or ABP (P < 0.01). In phase II, pulse oximeter MAP (96.6 mm Hg) was significantly closer to Doppler MAP (96.5 mm Hg) when compared to ABP (82.1 mm Hg) (P = 0.0001). Pulse oximeter derived blood pressure measurement may be as reliable as Doppler in patients with continuous flow LVADs.

Heart failure medications prescribed at discharge for patients with left ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Real-world use of traditional heart failure (HF) medications for patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is not well known.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational analysis of 1,887 advanced HF patients with and without LVADs from 32 LVAD hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry from January 2009 to March 2015. We examined HF medication prescription at discharge, temporal trends, and predictors of prescription among patients with an in-hospital (n = 258) or prior (n = 171) LVAD implant, and those with advanced HF but no LVAD, as defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤25% and in-hospital receipt of intravenous inotropes or vasopressin receptor antagonists (n = 1,458).

RESULTS

For β-blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB), discharge prescriptions were 58.9% and 53.5% for new LVAD patients, 53.8% and 42.9% for prior LVAD patients, and 73.4% and 63.2% for patients without LVAD support, respectively (both P < .0001). Aldosterone antagonist prescription quadrupled among LVAD patients during the study period (P < .0001), whereas ACEI/ARB use decreased nearly 20 percentage points (60.0% to 41.4%, P = .0003). In the multivariable analysis of LVAD patients, patient age was inversely associated with β-blocker, ACEI/ARB, and aldosterone antagonist prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional HF therapies were moderately prescribed at discharge to patients with LVADs and were more frequently prescribed to patients with advanced HF without LVAD support. Moderate prescription rates suggest clinical uncertainty in the use of antiadrenergic medication in this population. Further research is needed on the optimal medical regimen for patients with LVADs.

The HVAD Left Ventricular Assist Device: Risk Factors for Neurological Events and Risk Mitigation Strategies

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for ischemic in hemorrhage cerebrovascular events in patients supported by the HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD).

BACKGROUND

Patients supported with left ventricular assist devices are at risk for both ischemic and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular events.

METHODS

Patients undergoing implantation with a HVAD as part of the bridge-to-transplant trial and subsequent continued access protocol were included. Neurological events (ischemic cerebrovascular accidents [ICVAs] and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accidents [HCVAs]) were assessed, and the risk factors for these events were evaluated in a multivariable model.

RESULTS

A total of 382 patients were included: 140 bridge-to-transplant patients from the ADVANCE (Evaluation of the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device for the Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure) clinical trial and 242 patients from the continued access protocol. Patients had a mean age of 53.2 years; 71.2% were male, and 68.1% were white. Thirty-eight percent had ischemic heart disease, and the mean duration of support was 422.7 days. The overall prevalence of ICVA was 6.8% (26 of 382); for HCVA, it was 8.4% (32 of 382). Pump design modifications and a protocol-driven change in the antiplatelet therapy reduced the prevalence of ICVA from 6.3% (17 of 272) to 2.7% (3 of 110; p = 0.21) but had a negligible effect on the prevalence of HVCA (8.8% [24 of 272] vs. 6.4% [7 of 110]; p = 0.69). Multivariable predictors of ICVA were aspirin ≤81 mg and atrial fibrillation; predictors of HCVA were mean arterial pressure >90 mm Hg, aspirin ≤81 mg, and an international normalized ratio >3.0. Eight of the 30 participating sites had established improved blood pressure management (IBPM) protocols. Although the prevalence of ICVA for those with and without IBPM protocols was similar (5.3% [6 of 114] vs. 5.2% [14 of 268]; p = 0.99), those with IBPM protocols had a significantly lower prevalence of HCVA (1.8% [2 of 114] vs. 10.8% [29 of 268]; p = 0.0078).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, and blood pressure management affected the prevalence of cerebrovascular events after implantation of the HVAD. Attention to these clinical parameters can have a substantial impact on the occurrence of serious neurological events. (Evaluation of the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device for the Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure [ADVANCE]; NCT00751972).

Outcomes after stroke complicating left ventricular assist device

BACKGROUND

Stroke is one of the leading complications during continuous flow-left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support. Risk factors have been well described, although less is known regarding treatment and outcomes. We present a large single-center experience on stroke outcome and transplant eligibility by stroke sub-type and severity in CF-LVAD patients.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2008, and April 1, 2015, 301 patients underwent CF-LVAD (266 HeartMate II [HM I], Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA; 35 HeartWare [HVAD], HeartWare International Inc, Framingham, MA). Stroke was defined as a focal neurologic deficit with abnormal neuroimaging. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) definition excluded sub-dural hematoma and hemorrhagic conversion of an ischemic stroke (IS). Treatment in IS included intra-arterial embolectomy when appropriate; treatment in ICH included reversal of coagulopathy. Stroke severity was measured using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and transplant status.

RESULTS

Stroke occurred in 40 patients: 8 ICH (4 HM II, 4 HVAD) and 32 IS (26 HM II, 6 HVAD). Among 8 ICH patients, there were 4 deaths (50%), with NIHSS of 18.8 ± 13.7 vs 1.8 ± 1.7 in survivors (p = 0.049). Among 32 IS patients, 12 had hemorrhagic conversion and 5 were treated with intra-arterial embolectomy. There were 9 deaths (28%), with NIHSS of 16.2 ± 10.8 vs 7.0 ± 7.6 in survivors (p = 0.011). Among the 32 IS patients, 12 underwent transplant, and 1 is awaiting transplant. No ICH patients received a transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality after stroke is significantly affected by the initial neurologic impairment. Patients with IS appear to benefit the most from in-hospital treatment and often make sufficient recovery to be able to progress to transplant.

Use of Heart Failure Medical Therapies Among Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Insights From INTERMACS

BACKGROUND

Use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for treatment of advanced heart failure has expanded significantly over the past decade. However, concomitant use of heart failure medical therapies after implant is poorly characterized.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined the use of heart failure medications before and after LVAD implant in adult patients enrolled in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) between 2008 and 2013 (N = 9359). Using logistic regression, we examined relationships between patient characteristics and medication use at 3 months after implant. Baseline rates of heart failure therapies before implant were 38% for angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), 55% for β-blockers, 40% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), 87% for loop diuretics, 54% for amiodarone, 11% for phosphodiesterase inhibitors, 22% for warfarin, and 54% for antiplatelet agents. By 3 months after implant, the rates were 50% for ACE inhibitors or ARBs, 68% for β-blockers, 33% for MRAs, 68% for loop diuretics, 42% for amiodarone, 21% for phosphodiesterase inhibitors, 92% for warfarin, and 84% for antiplatelet agents. In general, age, preimplant INTERMACS profile, and prior medication use were associated with medication use at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall use of neurohormonal antagonists was low after LVAD implant, whereas use of loop diuretics and amiodarone remained high. Heart failure medication use is highly variable, but appears to generally increase after LVAD implantation. Low neurohormonal antagonist use may reflect practice uncertainty in the clinical utility of these medications post-LVAD.

Blood pressure management in mechanical circulatory support

Durable mechanical support has become widely available for end stage heart failure as destination therapy and as bridge to transplantation. The accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) as well as the recognition and management of hypertension in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-VADs) is an essential component of optimal clinical care. Strategies for the control of BP in CF-VAD patients are increasingly important as there is an evolving understanding of the connection between hypertension, pump output, and adverse outcomes. As clinical experience grows, optimal BP targets, as well as methods to measure BP in CF-VAD patients have been further defined.

Remote hemodynamic monitoring for ambulatory left ventricular assist device patients

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been shown to markedly improve survival and quality of life in patients with end-stage heart failure. However, despite ongoing improvements in survival and quality of life, significant challenges still exist in the management of these patients, including a high rate of recurrent heart failure and rehospitalizations. Similar challenges exist in the non-LVAD heart failure population as well, and recent efforts to utilize remote hemodynamic monitoring techniques to improve outcomes have shown promise. No data currently exist demonstrating extension of this benefit into the LVAD population, although a theoretical benefit can be extrapolated. Herein we review current remote hemodynamic methods and potential applications towards LVAD patients.

In Vivo Evaluation of Active and Passive Physiological Control Systems for Rotary Left and Right Ventricular Assist Devices

Preventing ventricular suction and venous congestion through balancing flow rates and circulatory volumes with dual rotary ventricular assist devices (VADs) configured for biventricular support is clinically challenging due to their low preload and high afterload sensitivities relative to the natural heart. This study presents the in vivo evaluation of several physiological control systems, which aim to prevent ventricular suction and venous congestion. The control systems included a sensor-based, master/slave (MS) controller that altered left and right VAD speed based on pressure and flow; a sensor-less compliant inflow cannula (IC), which altered inlet resistance and, therefore, pump flow based on preload; a sensor-less compliant outflow cannula (OC) on the right VAD, which altered outlet resistance and thus pump flow based on afterload; and a combined controller, which incorporated the MS controller, compliant IC, and compliant OC. Each control system was evaluated in vivo under step increases in systemic (SVR ∼1400-2400 dyne/s/cm(5) ) and pulmonary (PVR ∼200-1000 dyne/s/cm(5) ) vascular resistances in four sheep supported by dual rotary VADs in a biventricular assist configuration. Constant speed support was also evaluated for comparison and resulted in suction events during all resistance increases and pulmonary congestion during SVR increases. The MS controller reduced suction events and prevented congestion through an initial sharp reduction in pump flow followed by a gradual return to baseline (5.0 L/min). The compliant IC prevented suction events; however, reduced pump flows and pulmonary congestion were noted during the SVR increase. The compliant OC maintained pump flow close to baseline (5.0 L/min) and prevented suction and congestion during PVR increases. The combined controller responded similarly to the MS controller to prevent suction and congestion events in all cases while providing a backup system in the event of single controller failure.

Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: shared care goals of monitoring and treating patients

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have been clinically adopted as a long-term standard of care therapy option for patients with end-stage heart failure. For many patients, shared care between the care providers at the implanting center and care providers in the community in which the patient resides is a clinical necessity. The aims of this review are to (1) provide a rationale for the outpatient follow-up exam and surveillance testing used at our center to monitor patients supported by the HeartMate II(®) CF-LVAD (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA) and (2) provide the protocol/algorithms we use for blood pressure, driveline exit site, LVAD alarm history, surveillance blood work, and echocardiography monitoring in this patient population. In addition, we define our partnership outpatient follow-up protocol and the "shared care" specific responsibilities we use with referring health care providers to best manage many of our patients.

Physiological impact of continuous flow on end-organ function: clinical implications in the current era of left ventricular assist devices

The clinical era of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices has debunked many myths about the dire need of a pulse for human existence. While this therapy has been documented to provide a clear survival benefit in end-stage heart failure patients, we are now faced with certain morbidity challenges that as of yet have no easy mechanistic physiological explanation. The effect of physiological changes on end-organ function in patients supported by continuous-flow ventricular assist devices may offer insight into some of these morbidities. We therefore present a review of current evidence documenting the impact of continuous flow on end-organ function.