1
|
Hoefsmit PC, Jansen EK, Does RJMM, Zandbergen HR. The Search for an Outcome Variable That Measures Both Quality and Processes in Cardiac Surgery: Comparing the Quality Process Index and Mortality. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11101419. [PMID: 37239707 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11101419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The translation of a large quantity of data into valuable insights for daily clinical practice is underexplored. A considerable amount of information is overwhelming, making it difficult to distill and assess quality and processes at the hospital level. This study contributes to this necessary translation by developing a Quality Process Index that summarizes clinical data to measure quality and processes. METHODS The Quality Process Index was constructed to enable retrospective analyses of quality and process evolution from 2011 to 2021 for various surgery types in the Amsterdam Cardiosurgical Database (n = 5497). It is presented alongside mortality rates, which are the golden standard for quality measurement. The two outcome variables are compared as quality and process measurement options. RESULTS Results showed that the mean Quality Process Index appeared rather stable, even though analysis of variance found that the mean Quality Process Index differed significantly over the years (p < 0.001). The 30-day and 120-day mortality rates appeared to fluctuate more, but interestingly, we failed to reject the null hypothesis of equal means. The Quality Process Index and mortality rates were statistically negatively correlated, and the extent of correlation was more pronounced with the 120-day mortality rate, as computed using the Pearson correlation coefficient r (30-day rQPI,30 = -0.07, p < 0.001 and 120-day mortality rates rQPI,120 = -0.12, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The Quality Process Index seeks to address the need to translate data for quality and process improvement in healthcare. While mortality remains the most impactful outcome measure, the Quality Process Index provides a more stable and comprehensive measurement of quality and process improvement or deterioration in healthcare. Therefore, the Quality Process Index as a quantification reinforces the understanding of the definition of quality and process improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulien C Hoefsmit
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evert K Jansen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald J M M Does
- Department of Business Analytics, Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, 1081TV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Reinier Zandbergen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Durbin MD, Helvaty LR, Li M, Border W, Fitzgerald-Butt S, Garg V, Geddes GC, Helm BM, Lalani SR, McBride KL, McEntire A, Mitchell DK, Murali CN, Wechsler SB, Landis BJ, Ware SM. A multicenter cross-sectional study in infants with congenital heart defects demonstrates high diagnostic yield of genetic testing but variable evaluation practices. GENETICS IN MEDICINE OPEN 2023; 1:100814. [PMID: 39669248 PMCID: PMC11613605 DOI: 10.1016/j.gimo.2023.100814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
Purpose For patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), the most common birth defect, genetic evaluation is not universally accepted, and current practices are anecdotal. Here, we analyzed genetic evaluation practices across centers, determined diagnostic yield of testing, and identified phenotypic features associated with abnormal results. Methods This is a multicenter cross-sectional study of 5 large children's hospitals, including 2899 children ≤14 months undergoing surgical repair for CHD from 2013 to 2016, followed by multivariate logistics regression analysis. Results Genetic testing occurred in 1607 of 2899 patients (55%). Testing rates differed highly between institutions (42%-78%, P < .001). Choice of testing modality also differed across institutions (ie, chromosomal microarray, 26%-67%, P < .001). Genetic testing was abnormal in 702 of 1607 patients (44%), and no major phenotypic feature drove diagnostic yield. Only 849 patients were seen by geneticists (29%), ranging across centers (15%-52%, P < .001). Geneticist consultation associated with increased genetic testing yield (odds ratio: 5.7, 95% CI 4.33-7.58, P < .001). Conclusion Genetics evaluation in CHD is diagnostically important but underused and highly variable, with high diagnostic rates across patient types, including in infants with presumed isolated CHD. These findings support recommendations for comprehensive testing and standardization of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ming Li
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | - Vidu Garg
- Center for Cardiovascular Research and Heart Center and Division of Genetic and Genomic Medicine at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | - Kim L. McBride
- Center for Cardiovascular Research and Heart Center and Division of Genetic and Genomic Medicine at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Desai KD, Yuan I, Padiyath A, Goldsmith MP, Tsui FC, Pratap JN, Nelson O, Simpao AF. A Narrative Review of Multiinstitutional Data Registries of Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease in Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 37:461-470. [PMID: 36529633 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the most common birth anomalies. While the care of children with CHD has improved over recent decades, children with CHD who undergo general anesthesia remain at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Electronic health record systems have enabled institutions to combine data on the management and outcomes of children with CHD in multicenter registries. The application of descriptive analytics methods to these data can improve clinicians' understanding and care of children with CHD. This narrative review covers efforts to leverage multicenter data registries relevant to pediatric cardiac anesthesia and critical care to improve the care of children with CHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krupa D Desai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Ian Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Asif Padiyath
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael P Goldsmith
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Fu-Chiang Tsui
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jayant Nick Pratap
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Olivia Nelson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Allan F Simpao
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nelson JS, Jacobs JP, Bhamidipati CM, Yarboro LT, Subramanyan RK, McDonald D, Krohn C, Jones LA, Mayer JE, Scholl FG. Assessment of Current STS Data Elements for Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 114:2323-2329. [PMID: 34906569 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To identify opportunities for enhanced ACHD data collection, a structured review of existing variables in the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database (CHSD) and the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) was conducted. METHODS A working group was assembled representing multiple STS Workforces and Task Forces. The ACSD was reviewed systematically over eight 90 minute calls. ACSD version 4.20.2 and CHSD version 3.41 were used, and the ACSD was approached in sections. ACSD variables were classified as either: 1) represented in identical form in the CHSD (no further discussion), 2) represented in similar form in the CHSD (discussed for potential harmonization of definitions), or 3) not represented in the CHSD (discussed for potential inclusion). Variables felt to be relevant to ACHD were noted, and special consideration was given to STS required fields and variables utilized in existing STS adult risk models. Other factors that were examined were the frequency, utilization, and capture of existing ACSD variables. RESULTS Over 22 weeks (8 calls), the existing 1069 variables in version 4.20.2 of the ACSD were discussed. Ultimately, 539 total variables were found to be both 1) relevant to ACHD and 2) not currently collected in the CHSD. These were recommended for inclusion in the next CHSD upgrade for patients older than 18 years. CONCLUSIONS For adult patients having case records entered into the CHSD, the inclusion of a limited set of additional data fields from the ACSD should enhance capture of co-morbidities and other clinical data relevant to the ACHD population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Nelson
- Department of Cardiovascular Services, Nemours Children's Hospital; 6535 Nemours Parkway; Orlando, FL 32827; USA; University of Central Florida College of Medicine; 6850 Lake Nona Blvd, Orlando, FL 32827; USA.
| | - Jeffrey P Jacobs
- Congenital Heart Center, UF Health Shands Children's Hospital, Gainesville, Florida, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Leora T Yarboro
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, VA; USA
| | - Ram Kumar Subramanyan
- Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; USA
| | - Donna McDonald
- Society of Thoracic Surgeons; 633 N. Saint Clair Street; Chicago, Illinois; USA
| | - Carole Krohn
- Society of Thoracic Surgeons; 633 N. Saint Clair Street; Chicago, Illinois; USA
| | - Leigh Ann Jones
- Society of Thoracic Surgeons; 633 N. Saint Clair Street; Chicago, Illinois; USA
| | - John E Mayer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, Massachusetts; USA
| | - Frank G Scholl
- Department of Surgery, Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, Hollywood, Florida; USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Myocardial Revascularization Surgery: JACC Historical Breakthroughs in Perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78:365-383. [PMID: 34294272 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was introduced in the 1960s as the first procedure for direct coronary artery revascularization and rapidly became one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide, with an overall total of more than 20 million operations performed. CABG continues to be the most common cardiac surgical procedure performed and has been one of the most carefully studied therapies. Best CABG techniques, optimal bypass conduits, and appropriate patient selection have been rigorously tested in landmark clinical trials, some of which have resolved controversy and most of which have stoked further debate and trials. The evolution of CABG cannot be properly portrayed without presenting it in the context of the parallel development of percutaneous coronary intervention. In this Historical Perspective, we a provide a broad overview of the history of coronary revascularization with a focus on the foundations, evolution, best evidence, and future directions of CABG.
Collapse
|
6
|
Schults J, Kleidon T, Chopra V, Cooke M, Paterson R, Ullman AJ, Marsh N, Ray-Barruel G, Hill J, Devrim İ, Hammarskjold F, Pedreira ML, Bertoglio S, Egan G, Mimoz O, van Boxtel T, DeVries M, Magalhaes M, Hallam C, Oakley S, Rickard CM. International recommendations for a vascular access minimum dataset: a Delphi consensus-building study. BMJ Qual Saf 2020; 30:722-730. [PMID: 32963025 PMCID: PMC8380895 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data regarding vascular access device use and outcomes are limited. In part, this gap reflects the absence of guidance on what variables should be collected to assess patient outcomes. We sought to derive international consensus on a vascular access minimum dataset. METHODS A modified Delphi study with three rounds (two electronic surveys and a face-to-face consensus panel) was conducted involving international vascular access specialists. In Rounds 1 and 2, electronic surveys were distributed to healthcare professionals specialising in vascular access. Survey respondents were asked to rate the importance of variables, feasibility of data collection and acceptability of items, definitions and response options. In Round 3, a purposive expert panel met to review Round 1 and 2 ratings and reach consensus (defined as ≥70% agreement) on the final items to be included in a minimum dataset for vascular access devices. RESULTS A total of 64 of 225 interdisciplinary healthcare professionals from 11 countries responded to Round 1 and 2 surveys (response rate of 34% and 29%, respectively). From the original 52 items, 50 items across five domains emerged from the Delphi procedure.Items related to demographic and clinical characteristics (n=5; eg, age), device characteristics (n=5; eg, device type), insertion (n=16; eg, indication), management (n=9; eg, dressing and securement), and complication and removal (n=15, eg, occlusion) were identified as requirements for a minimum dataset to track and evaluate vascular access device use and outcomes. CONCLUSION We developed and internally validated a minimum dataset for vascular access device research. This study generated new knowledge to enable healthcare systems to collect relevant, useful and meaningful vascular access data. Use of this standardised approach can help benchmark clinical practice and target improvements worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Schults
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia .,Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Association for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tricia Kleidon
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Association for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | - Vineet Chopra
- The Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Marie Cooke
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.,Association for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebecca Paterson
- Association for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amanda J Ullman
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.,Association for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nicole Marsh
- Association for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.,Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gillian Ray-Barruel
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.,Association for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.,QUII Jubilee Hospital, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jocelyn Hill
- Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - İlker Devrim
- Dr. Behçet Uz Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Fredrik Hammarskjold
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, County Hospital Ryhov, Jonkoping, Sweden
| | | | - Sergio Bertoglio
- Department of Surgery, University of Genoa, Genova, Liguria, Italy
| | - Gail Egan
- Interventional Radiology, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Olivier Mimoz
- Emergency Department, University Hospital Centre Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Ton van Boxtel
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle DeVries
- Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Maria Magalhaes
- Neonatal Intensive Care, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio, Brazil
| | - Carole Hallam
- Infection Prevention Society, Seafield, West Lothian, UK
| | | | - Claire M Rickard
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.,Association for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Accini Mendoza JL, Atehortua L LH, Nieto Estrada VH, Rebolledo M CE, Duran Pérez JC, Senior JM, Hernández Leiva E, Valencia AA, Escobar Serna JF, Dueñas Castell C, Cotes Ramos R, Beltrán N, Thomen Palacio R, López García DA, Pizarro Gómez C, Florián Pérez MC, Franco S, García H, Rincón FM, Danetra Novoa CA, Delgado JF. Consenso colombiano de cuidados perioperatorios en cirugía cardiaca del paciente adulto. ACTA COLOMBIANA DE CUIDADO INTENSIVO 2020; 20:118-157. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acci.2020.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2025]
|
8
|
Dominici C, Salsano A, Nenna A, Spadaccio C, El‐Dean Z, Bashir M, Mariscalco G, Santini F, Chello M. Neurological outcomes after on‐pump vs off‐pump CABG in patients with cerebrovascular disease. J Card Surg 2019; 34:941-947. [DOI: 10.1111/jocs.14158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Dominici
- Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryUniversità Campus Bio‐Medico di Roma Rome Italy
| | - Antonio Salsano
- Department of Cardiac SurgeryUniversity of Genoa Genoa Italy
| | - Antonio Nenna
- Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryUniversità Campus Bio‐Medico di Roma Rome Italy
| | | | - Zein El‐Dean
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Glenfirld HospitalUniversity Hospitals of Leicester Leicester UK
| | - Mohamad Bashir
- Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm ServiceLiverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Liverpool UK
| | - Giovanni Mariscalco
- Department of Cardiac SurgeryUniversity of Genoa Genoa Italy
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Glenfirld HospitalUniversity Hospitals of Leicester Leicester UK
| | | | - Massimo Chello
- Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryUniversità Campus Bio‐Medico di Roma Rome Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The practice of congenital heart surgery faces intense public scrutiny. Collaboration is key to improve our processes and outcomes. Croti and colleagues report on one such collaboration between Children's Heart Link, IQIC, and a Brazilian congenital heart program and demonstrate the value of this approach convincingly.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ruiz Tsukazan MT, Terra RM, Bibas BJ, Salati M. An adaptation of the Hungarian model: the Brazilian model. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S3511-S3515. [PMID: 30510787 PMCID: PMC6230826 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery (BSTS) has the mission of improving patient care quality and thoracic surgery education. In order to achieve those goals, an overview of thoracic surgery activity in Brazil was necessary. BSTS had a clear need to start a national database. In 2015, BSTS joined European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Database platform. This partnership was a great choice not only for having a consolidated database, but also for allowing the development of shared educational and scientific projects. The strategy for BSTS database project was selecting committed group of surgeons, establishing implementation phases and setting milestones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Teresa Ruiz Tsukazan
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital São Lucas Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Mingarini Terra
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto do Coração, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Benoit Jacques Bibas
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto do Coração, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Michele Salati
- Unit of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bavaria JE, Fukuhara S, Desai ND. Thoracic aortic surgery enters the era of big data. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 52:499-500. [PMID: 28874033 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph E Bavaria
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shinichi Fukuhara
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nimesh D Desai
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thornblade LW, Wood DE, Mulligan MS, Farivar AS, Hubka M, Costas KE, Krishnadasan B, Farjah F. Variability in invasive mediastinal staging for lung cancer: A multicenter regional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018. [PMID: 29534904 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prior studies have reported underuse of-but not variability in-invasive mediastinal staging in the pretreatment evaluation of patients with lung cancer. We sought to compare rates of invasive mediastinal staging for lung cancer across hospitals participating in a regional quality improvement and research collaborative. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study (2011-2013) of patients undergoing resected lung cancer from the Surgical Clinical Outcomes and Assessment Program in Washington State. Invasive mediastinal staging included mediastinoscopy and/or endobronchial/esophageal ultrasound-guided nodal aspiration. We used a mixed-effects model to mitigate the influence of small sample sizes at any 1 hospital on rates of invasive staging and to adjust for hospital-level differences in the frequency of clinical stage IA disease. RESULTS A total of 406 patients (mean age, 68 years; 69% clinical stage IA; and 67% lobectomy) underwent resection at 5 hospitals (4 community and 1 academic). Invasive staging occurred in 66% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 61%-71%). CI inspection revealed that 2 hospitals performed invasive staging significantly more often than the overall average (94%, [95% CI, 89%-96%] and 84% [95% CI, 78%-88%]), whereas 2 hospitals performed invasive staging significantly less often than overall average (31% [95% CI, 21%-44%] and 17% [95% CI, 7%-36%]). CONCLUSIONS Rates of invasive mediastinal staging varied significantly across hospitals providing surgical care for patients with lung cancer. Future studies that aim to understand the reasons underlying variability in care may inform quality improvement initiatives or lead to the development of novel staging algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Douglas E Wood
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
| | | | | | - Michal Hubka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Wash
| | - Kimberly E Costas
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Providence Regional Medical Center, Everett, Wash
| | | | - Farhood Farjah
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Freundlich RE, Ehrenfeld JM. Perioperative Information Systems: Opportunities to Improve Delivery of Care and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 32:1458-1463. [PMID: 29229258 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
A variety of existing perioperative informatics tools offer clinicians and researchers the opportunity to improve the delivery of care and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing cardiac and vascular surgery. Many of these tools can be used to improve the reliability of the care delivery process through the application of clinical decision support tools and/or quality improvement methodologies at a number of junctures. In this review, the authors will offer a concise overview of the existing perioperative informatics literature, with a focus on tools considered to be of utility in confronting the unique challenges inherent to cardiac and vascular surgery. The authors also highlight areas that they believe are of interest for future targeted inquiry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E Freundlich
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
| | - Jesse M Ehrenfeld
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Surgery, Biomedical Informatics, and Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Metformin therapy and postoperative atrial fibrillation in diabetic patients after cardiac surgery. J Intensive Care 2017; 5:60. [PMID: 29075499 PMCID: PMC5648492 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-017-0254-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly occurs in cardiac surgery patients. Studies suggest inflammation and oxidative stress contribute to postoperative AF development in this patient population. Metformin exerts an anti-inflammatory effect that reduces oxidative stress and thus may play a role in preventing postoperative AF. Methods We conducted a matched, retrospective cohort study of diabetic patients’ age ≥18 undergoing a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and/or cardiac valve surgery from January 1, 2009, to November 30, 2014. We extracted data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Primary exposure was ongoing metformin use at a dose of ≥ 500 mg in effect before cardiac surgery as captured before admission. Primary study outcome was postoperative AF incidence. Matching was used to reduce selection bias between metformin and non-metformin groups. Comparison between the groups after matching was accomplished using the McNemar test or paired t test. Results Out of the 4177 patients with cardiac surgery (CABG and/or valve surgery), 1283 patients met our study criteria. These patients were grouped into metformin [n = 635 (49.5%)] and non-metformin [n = 648 (50.5%)] users. Pre-matching, postoperative AF was found in 149 (23.5%) patients in the metformin group and 172 (26.5%) in the non-metformin group (p = 0.2088). Matching resulted in a total of 114 patients in each group (metformin vs. non-metformin). We found no statistically significant difference for postoperative AF between the two groups after matching (p = 0.8964). Conclusions Prior use of metformin therapy in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery was not associated with decreased rate of postoperative AF.
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Cost of Cardiac Surgery in Frail Compared With Nonfrail Older Adults. Can J Cardiol 2017; 33:1020-1026. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Revised: 02/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
|
17
|
Hawkins RB, Mehaffey JH, Downs EA, Johnston LE, Yarboro LT, Fonner CE, Speir AM, Rich JB, Quader MA, Ailawadi G, Ghanta RK. Regional Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104:1275-1281. [PMID: 28599962 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Revised: 02/19/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical management of acute type A aortic dissection is evolving, and many aortic centers of excellence are reporting superior outcomes. We hypothesize that similar trends exist in a multiinstitutional regional consortium. METHODS Records for 884 consecutive patients who underwent aortic operations (2003 to 2015) for acute type A aortic dissection were extracted from a regional The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Patients were stratified into three equal operative eras. Differences in outcomes and risk factors for morbidity and mortality were determined. RESULTS Surgical procedures for type A aortic dissection are increasing in extent and complexity. Aortic root repair was performed in 16% of early era cases compared with 67% currently (p < 0.0001). Similarly, aortic arch repair increased from 27% to 37% cases (p < 0.0001). Cerebral perfusion is currently used in 85% of circulatory arrest cases, most frequently antegrade (57%). Total circulatory arrest times increased (29 minutes vs 31 minutes vs 36 minutes; p = 0.005), but times without cerebral perfusion were stable (12 minutes vs 6 minutes; p = 0.68). Although the operative mortality rate remained stable at 18.9% during the 3 operative eras, there were significant decreases in pneumonia and reoperations (p < 0.05). Predictors of operative mortality and major morbidity are age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; p < 0.0001), previous stroke (OR, 2.09; p = 0.03), and elevated creatinine (OR, 1.31; p = 0.01). Importantly, the extent of aortic operation did not increase risk for morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSIONS Operative morbidity and mortality remain significant for type A aortic dissection, but lower than historical outcomes. The extent of aortic surgery has increased, resulting in adaptive cerebral protection changes in contemporary "real-world" practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B Hawkins
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - J Hunter Mehaffey
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Emily A Downs
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Lily E Johnston
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Leora T Yarboro
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Clifford E Fonner
- Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Alan M Speir
- INOVA Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Jeffrey B Rich
- Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Mohammed A Quader
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Gorav Ailawadi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ravi K Ghanta
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hawkins RB, Downs EA, Johnston LE, Mehaffey JH, Fonner CE, Ghanta RK, Speir AM, Rich JB, Quader MA, Yarboro LT, Ailawadi G. Impact of Transcatheter Technology on Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Volume, Outcomes, and Cost. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103:1815-1823. [PMID: 28450137 PMCID: PMC5596915 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Revised: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) represents a disruptive technology that is rapidly expanding in use. We evaluated the effect on surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) patient selection, outcomes, volume, and cost. METHODS A total of 11,565 patients who underwent SAVR, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (2002 to 2015), were evaluated from the Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative database. Patients were stratified by surgical era: pre-TAVR era (2002 to 2008, n = 5,113), early-TAVR era (2009 to 2011, n = 2,709), and commercial-TAVR era (2012 to 2015, n = 3,743). Patient characteristics, outcomes, and resource utilization were analyzed by univariate analyses. RESULTS Throughout the study period, statewide SAVR volumes increased with median volumes of pre-TAVR: 722 cases/year, early-TAVR: 892 cases/year, and commercial-TAVR: 940 cases/year (p = 0.005). Implementation of TAVR was associated with declining Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality among SAVR patients (3.7%, 2.6%, and 2.4%; p < 0.0001), despite increasing rates of comorbid disease. The mortality rate was lowest in the current commercial-TAVR era (3.9%, 4.3%, and 3.2%; p = 0.05), and major morbidity decreased throughout the time period (21.2%, 20.5%, and 15.2%; p < 0.0001). The lowest observed-to-expected ratios for both occurred in the commercial-TAVR era (0.9 and 0.9, respectively). Resource utilization increased generally, including total cost increases from $42,835 to $51,923 to $54,710 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS At present, SAVR volumes have not been affected by the introduction of TAVR. The outcomes for SAVR continue to improve, potentially due to availability of transcatheter options for high-risk patients. Despite rising costs for SAVR, open approaches still provide a significant cost advantage over TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B Hawkins
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Emily A Downs
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Lily E Johnston
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - J Hunter Mehaffey
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Clifford E Fonner
- Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Ravi K Ghanta
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Alan M Speir
- INOVA Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Jeffrey B Rich
- Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Mohammed A Quader
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Leora T Yarboro
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Gorav Ailawadi
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Freundlich RE, Maile MD, Hajjar MM, Habib JR, Jewell ES, Schwann T, Habib RH, Engoren M. Years of Life Lost After Complications of Coronary Artery Bypass Operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 103:1893-1899. [PMID: 27938887 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Revised: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We currently have an incomplete understanding of which postoperative complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are associated with long-term death. The purpose of this study was to find the associations between complications and attributable death. METHODS Prospectively collected data on patient characteristics, risk factors, and complications of patients undergoing isolated CABG with 20-year follow-up were analyzed with a Cox regression model to calculate the overall hazard of dying associated with each postoperative complication. An individual's age and hazard of dying from each complication were then used to calculate years of life lost to each complication. RESULTS The postoperative mortality rate was 0.79% (69 of 8,773) at 30 days, 2.85% (250 of 8,773) at 180 days, and 6.38% (560 of 8,773) at 2 years. At a median follow-up of 9.8 years, 1,891 patients (21.6%) had died. Postoperative complications occurred in 3,438 patients (39.2%). Cardiac arrest (hazard ratio, 2.153), reoperation (hazard ratio, 1.679), and new dialysis (hazard ratio, 1.64) were the complications with the greatest hazard of death. After adjusting for complication incidence and patient age, cardiac arrest (703 years), reoperation (544 years), atrial fibrillation (470 years), and prolonged mechanical ventilation (371 years) were associated with the greatest number of years of life lost. CONCLUSIONS Acute cardiac arrest, reoperation for other cardiac reasons, new dialysis, atrial fibrillation, and prolonged mechanical ventilation are associated with the largest increase in attributable deaths. Prevention and treatment of these complications may improve mortality rates after cardiac operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E Freundlich
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
| | - Michael D Maile
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Mark M Hajjar
- Department of Internal Medicine and Outcomes Research Unit, American University Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Internal Medicine and Outcomes Research Unit, American University Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Elizabeth S Jewell
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Thomas Schwann
- Department of Surgery, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Robert H Habib
- Department of Internal Medicine and Outcomes Research Unit, American University Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Milo Engoren
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Anesthesiology, Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Stevens LM, Noiseux N, Prieto I, Hardy JF. Major transfusions remain frequent despite the generalized use of tranexamic acid: an audit of 3322 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Transfusion 2016; 56:1857-65. [DOI: 10.1111/trf.13615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Revised: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Louis-Mathieu Stevens
- Division of Cardiac Surgery and the; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
- Department of Anesthesiology; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
- CHUM Research Center (CRCHUM); Montréal Québec Canada
| | - Nicolas Noiseux
- Division of Cardiac Surgery and the; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
- Department of Anesthesiology; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
- CHUM Research Center (CRCHUM); Montréal Québec Canada
| | - Ignacio Prieto
- Division of Cardiac Surgery and the; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
| | - Jean-François Hardy
- Department of Anesthesiology; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
- CHUM Research Center (CRCHUM); Montréal Québec Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Patient Safety Science in Cardiothoracic Surgery: An Overview. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101:426-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2015] [Revised: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 12/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
22
|
Jacobs JP, Shahian DM, Prager RL, Edwards FH, McDonald D, Han JM, D'Agostino RS, Jacobs ML, Kozower BD, Badhwar V, Thourani VH, Gaissert HA, Fernandez FG, Wright C, Fann JI, Paone G, Sanchez JA, Cleveland JC, Brennan JM, Dokholyan RS, O’Brien SM, Peterson ED, Grover FL, Patterson GA. Introduction to the STS National Database Series. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100:1992-2000. [DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2015] [Revised: 10/14/2015] [Accepted: 10/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
23
|
Rao C, Zhang H, Gao H, Zhao Y, Yuan X, Hua K, Hu S, Zheng Z. The Chinese Cardiac Surgery Registry: Design and Data Audit. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 101:1514-20. [PMID: 26652141 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2015] [Revised: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 09/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In light of the burgeoning volume and certain variation of in-hospital outcomes of cardiac operations in China, a large patient-level registry was needed. We generated the Chinese Cardiac Surgery Registry (CCSR) database in 2013 to benchmark, continuously monitor, and provide feedback of the quality of adult cardiac operations. We report on the design of this database and provide an overview of participating sites and quality of data. METHODS We established a network of participating sites with an adult cardiac surgery volume of more than 100 operations per year for continuous web-based registry of in-hospital and follow-up data of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve operations. After a routine data quality audit, we report the performance and quality of care back to the participating sites. RESULTS In total, 87 centers participated and submitted 46,303 surgical procedures from January 2013 to December 2014. The timeliness rates of the short-list and in-hospital data submitted were 73.6% and 70.2%, respectively. The completeness and accuracy rates of the in-hospital data were 97.6% and 95.1%, respectively. We have provided 2 reports for each site and 1 national report regarding the performance of isolated CABG and valve operations. CONCLUSIONS The newly launched CCSR with a national representativeness network and good data quality has the potential to act as an important platform for monitoring and improving cardiac surgical care in mainland China, as well as facilitating research projects, establishing benchmarking standards, and identifying potential areas for quality improvements (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02400125).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenfei Rao
- National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Heng Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Huawei Gao
- National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Zhao
- National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Yuan
- National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Kun Hua
- National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Shengshou Hu
- National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhe Zheng
- National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Efird JT, Griffin WF, Gudimella P, O'Neal WT, Davies SW, Crane PB, Anderson EJ, Kindell LC, Landrine H, O'Neal JB, Alwair H, Kypson AP, Nifong WL, Chitwood WR. Conditional long-term survival following minimally invasive robotic mitral valve repair: a health services perspective. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 4:433-42. [PMID: 26539348 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319x.2015.08.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conditional survival is defined as the probability of surviving an additional number of years beyond that already survived. The aim of this study was to compute conditional survival in patients who received a robotically assisted, minimally invasive mitral valve repair procedure (RMVP). METHODS Patients who received RMVP with annuloplasty band from May 2000 through April 2011 were included. A 5- and 10-year conditional survival model was computed using a multivariable product-limit method. RESULTS Non-smoking men (≤65 years) who presented in sinus rhythm had a 96% probability of surviving at least 10 years if they survived their first year following surgery. In contrast, recent female smokers (>65 years) with preoperative atrial fibrillation only had an 11% probability of surviving beyond 10 years if alive after one year post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS In the context of an increasingly managed healthcare environment, conditional survival provides useful information for patients needing to make important treatment decisions, physicians seeking to select patients most likely to benefit long-term following RMVP, and hospital administrators needing to comparatively assess the life-course economic value of high-tech surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimmy T Efird
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William F Griffin
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Preeti Gudimella
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wesley T O'Neal
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen W Davies
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patricia B Crane
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ethan J Anderson
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Linda C Kindell
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hope Landrine
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jason B O'Neal
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hazaim Alwair
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alan P Kypson
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wiley L Nifong
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - W Randolph Chitwood
- 1 East Carolina Heart Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 2 Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA ; 6 Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA ; 7 The College of Nursing at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA ; 8 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Winkley Shroyer AL, Bakaeen F, Shahian DM, Carr BM, Prager RL, Jacobs JP, Ferraris V, Edwards F, Grover FL. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: The Driving Force for Improvement in Cardiac Surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 27:144-51. [PMID: 26686440 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Initiated in 1989, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) includes more than 1085 participating centers, representing 90%-95% of current US-based adult cardiac surgery hospitals. Since its inception, the primary goal of the STS ACSD has been to use clinical data to track and improve cardiac surgical outcomes. Patients' preoperative risk characteristics, procedure-related processes of care, and clinical outcomes data have been captured and analyzed, with timely risk-adjusted feedback reports to participating providers. In 2006, STS initiated an external audit process to evaluate STS ACSD completeness and accuracy. Given the extremely high inter-rater reliability and completeness rates of STS ACSD, it is widely regarded as the "gold standard" for benchmarking cardiac surgery risk-adjusted outcomes. Over time, STS ACSD has expanded its quality horizons beyond the traditional focus on isolated, risk-adjusted short-term outcomes such as perioperative morbidity and mortality. New quality indicators have evolved including composite measures of key processes of care and outcomes (risk-adjusted morbidity and risk-adjusted mortality), longer-term outcomes, and readmissions. Resource use and patient-reported outcomes would be added in the future. These additional metrics provide a more comprehensive perspective on quality as well as additional end points. Widespread acceptance and use of STS ACSD has led to a cultural transformation within cardiac surgery by providing nationally benchmarked data for internal quality assessment, aiding data-driven quality improvement activities, serving as the basis for a voluntary public reporting program, advancing cardiac surgery care through STS ACSD-based research, and facilitating data-driven informed consent dialogues and alternative treatment-related discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Laurie Winkley Shroyer
- Research and Development Service, Northport Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Northport, New York; Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York.
| | - Faisal Bakaeen
- Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine and Michael E. DeBakey VAMC, Houston, Texas
| | - David M Shahian
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brendan M Carr
- Research and Development Service, Northport Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Northport, New York; Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Richard L Prager
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jeffrey P Jacobs
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins All Children׳s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Saint Petersburg and Tampa, Florida
| | - Victor Ferraris
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky School of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Fred Edwards
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida School of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Frederick L Grover
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Surgery, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shapira OM, Korach A, Pinaud F, Dabah A, Bao Y, Corbeau JJ, de Brux JL, Baufreton C. Safety and efficacy of biocompatible perfusion strategy in a contemporary series of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting - a two-center study. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 9:196. [PMID: 25519179 PMCID: PMC4274677 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-014-0196-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2014] [Accepted: 12/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The profile of patients referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is continuously changing to include older patients with multiple comorbidities. We assessed the safety and efficacy of a biocompatible perfusion strategy (BPS) in a contemporary series of patients undergoing isolated CABG. Methods BPS consisted of a membrane oxygenator, tip-to-tip closed-system heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits without a cardiotomy reservoir, low systemic anticoagulation (target ACT – 250-300 sec) using heparin titration curves, low prime volume, avoidance of systemic cooling, and routine use of cell saver and anti-fibrinolytics. Data were prospectively collected using the American Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database definitions. Results 964 consecutive patients (mean age 66 ± 11 years, 83% male) undergoing CABG between 2008 and 2012 were enrolled. 30-day mortality was 1.4%. Rates of postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction, sternal infection and reoperation for bleeding were 0.9%, 1.3%, 1.9% and 4.2%, respectively. Average 24-hour chest tube drainage was 440 ± 280 ml. Blood products were used in 34% of patients (total donor exposure of 1.7 ± 4.7 units/patient). Predictors of hospital mortality in multivariable analysis were left main disease and preoperative treatment with anti-arrhythmic or immunosuppressive medications. Predictors of allogeneic blood transfusions included older age, small body surface area, female gender, increased serum creatinine, lower preoperative LVEF and hematocrit. Priority of surgery, dual antiplatelet therapy and cardiopulmonary bypass time were not predictors of adverse outcomes or blood transfusions. Conclusions In a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing CABG, the use of BPS is safe and effective. It is associated with excellent clinical outcomes and reduced allogeneic blood transfusions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-014-0196-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oz M Shapira
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, POB 12000, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
| | - Amit Korach
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, POB 12000, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
| | - Frederic Pinaud
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
| | - Abeer Dabah
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, POB 12000, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel. abeerd-@hotmail.com
| | - Yusheng Bao
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, POB 12000, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
| | | | - Jean-Louis de Brux
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
The Association of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Availability and Hospital Aortic Valve Replacement Volume and Mortality in the United States. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98:2016-22; discussion 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2014] [Revised: 07/24/2014] [Accepted: 07/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|