Patterns of aortic valve replacement in Europe and adoption by sex

OBJECTIVE

Management of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may differ according to the patient sex. This study aimed to describe patterns of aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe AS across Europe, including stratification by sex.

METHODS

Procedure volume data for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for six years (2015-2020) were extracted from national databases for Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland and stratified by sex. Patients per million population (PPM) undergoing AVR per year were calculated using population estimates from Eurostat.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2019, AVR procedures grew at an average annual rate of 3.9%. In 2020, the average total PPM undergoing AVR across all countries was 339, with 51% of procedures being TAVI and 49% SAVR. AVR PPM varied widely between countries, with the highest and lowest in Germany and Poland, respectively. The average total PPM was higher for men than women (423 vs. 258), but a higher proportion of women (62%) than men (44%) received TAVI. The proportion of TAVI among total AVR procedures increased with age, with an overall average of 96% of men and 98% of women aged ≥85 years receiving TAVI; however, adoption of TAVI varied by country.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of temporal trends in the adoption of TAVI vs. SAVR across Europe showed significant variations. Despite the higher use of TAVI vs. SAVR in women, overall rates of AV intervention in women were lower compared to men.

Temporal Trends, Outcomes, and Predictors of Next-Day Discharge and Readmission Following Uncomplicated Evolut Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Next-day discharge (NDD) outcomes following uncomplicated self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement have not been studied. Here, we compare readmission rates and clinical outcomes in NDD versus non-NDD transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Evolut.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry patients (n=29 597) undergoing elective transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expanding supra-annular valves (Evolut R, PRO, and PRO+) from July 2019 to June 2021 were stratified by postprocedure length of stay: ≤1 day (NDD) versus >1 day (non-NDD). Propensity score matching was used to compare risk adjusted 30-day readmission rates and 1-year outcomes in NDD versus non-NDD, and multivariable regression to determine predictors of NDD and readmission. Between the first and last calendar quarter, the rate of NDD increased from 45.4% to 62.1% and median length of stay decreased from 2 days to 1. Propensity score matching produced relatively well-matched NDD and non-NDD cohorts (n=10 549 each). After matching, NDD was associated with lower 30-day readmission rates (6.3% versus 8.4%; P<0.001) and 1-year adverse outcomes (death, 7.0% versus 9.3%; life threatening/major bleeding, 1.6% versus 3.4%; new permanent pacemaker implantation/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, 3.6 versus 11.0%; [all P<0.001]). Predictors of NDD included non-Hispanic ethnicity, preexisting permanent pacemaker implantation/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and previous surgical aortic valve replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients undergoing uncomplicated self-expanding Evolut transcatheter aortic valve replacement are discharged the next day. This study found that NDD can be predicted from baseline patient characteristics and was associated with favorable 30-day and 1-year outcomes, including low rates of permanent pacemaker implantation and readmission.

Expansion of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States

BACKGROUND

Patterns of diffusion of TAVR in the United States (U.S.) and its relation to racial disparities in TAVR utilization remain unknown.

METHODS

We identified TAVR hospitals in the continental U.S. from 2012-2017 using Medicare database and mapped them to Hospital Referral Regions (HRR). We calculated driving distance from each residential ZIP code to the nearest TAVR hospital and calculated the proportion of the U.S. population, in general and by race, that lived <100 miles driving distance from the nearest TAVR center. Using a discrete time hazard logistic regression model, we examined the association of hospital and HRR variables with the opening of a TAVR program.

RESULTS

The number of TAVR hospitals increased from 230 in 2012 to 540 in 2017. The proportion of the U.S. population living <100 miles from nearest TAVR hospital increased from 89.3% in 2012 to 94.5% in 2017. Geographic access improved for all racial and ethnic subgroups: Whites (84.1%-93.6%), Blacks (90.0%- 97.4%), and Hispanics (84.9%-93.7%). Within a HRR, the odds of opening a new TAVR program were higher among teaching hospitals (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.16-1.88) and hospital bed size (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.37-1.52). Market-level factors associated with new TAVR programs were proportion of Black (per 1%, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.89) and Hispanic (per 1%, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90) residents, the proportion of hospitals within the HRR that already had a TAVR program (per 10%, OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11), P <.01 for all.

CONCLUSION

The expansion of TAVR programs in the U.S. has been accompanied by an increase in geographic coverage for all racial subgroups. Further study is needed to determine reasons for TAVR underutilization in Blacks and Hispanics.

Increasing Wait-Time Mortality for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Population-Level Study of the Transition in Practice From Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a reasonable alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). There is limited data on temporal trends in wait-times and access to care for patients with AS, irrespective of treatment modality. We sought to investigate the trends in wait-times for the treatment (either SAVR or TAVR) of AS in Ontario, Canada, and to understand the drivers of wait-list mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure.

METHODS

In this population-level retrospective cohort study, we identified patients from April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2018, who were referred for treatment of symptomatic severe AS awaiting either SAVR or TAVR. The primary outcome was the median total wait-time from referral date to either SAVR or TAVR procedure. Primary clinical outcomes were all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalizations while on the wait-list.

RESULTS

The referral cohort consisted of a total of 22 876 referrals for aortic valve replacement, with (N=8098) TAVR and (N=14 778) SAVR referrals. The mean and median wait times for the overall AVR cohort were 87 and 59 days, respectively. The TAVR subcohort had longer wait-times (median 84 days) compared with the SAVR subcohort (median 50 days). Year over year, there was a statistically significant an increase in wait-times (P<0.001) for the overall AS cohort as well as each of the TAVR (P<0.0001) and SAVR (P<0.0001) subgroups. Wait-time mortality was 2.5% (TAVR 5.2% and SAVR 1.05%), while the cumulative probability of heart failure hospitalization was 3.6% (TAVR 7.7% and SAVR 1.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe symptomatic AS awaiting aortic valve replacement, there has been a trend of increasing wait times for both SAVR and TAVR. This was associated with increasing mortality and hospitalizations related to heart failure while on the wait-list.

Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis Before and During the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Recent positive results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) in clinical trials have sparked debate on whether TAVI should be first line for all patients with aortic stenosis. However, limited evidence exists on the clinical impact of TAVI on a national level. Using the national inpatient sample (NIS) of hospital discharges in the United States from 2001 to 2016, we evaluated the rate of AVR and associated in-hospital outcomes in pre-TAVI and TAVI era. Hierarchical mixed effect modeling was used to assess for trend and calculate risk adjusted estimates. Annual volume of AVR increased from 49,357 in 2001 to 100,050 in 2016 (103% increase). Compared with the pre-TAVI era, mean annual change in volume of AVR was higher in the TAVI era (+2.9% vs +9.4%, respectively, p <0.001). In contrast, rate of in-hospital mortality decreased from 5.4% in 2001 to 2.7% in 2016 (50% decrease). Compared with the pre-TAVI era, magnitude of mean annual change in mortality was higher in TAVI era (-4.0% vs -6.7%, respectively, p = 0.04). Unlike SAVR for which risk-adjusted rate for most outcomes seems to have plateaued, TAVI demonstrated significant improvement from 2012 to 2016 for mortality (4.6% to 1.8%), acute kidney injury (15.1% to 2.6%) and nonroutine home discharge (63.6% to 44.6%). However, no significant change in the rate of stroke (2.4% to 2.1%) and pacemaker implantation remained high (8.1% to 9.4%). Lastly, median length of stay was shorter for TAVI compared with isolated SAVR (3 vs 8 days, respectively). In conclusion, the adoption of TAVI has led to increase in volume of AVR for severe aortic stenosis in the United States with favorable short-term outcome.

Transcatheter Electrosurgery: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Transcatheter electrosurgery refers to a family of procedures using radiofrequency energy to vaporize and traverse or lacerate tissue despite flowing blood. The authors review theory, simulations, and benchtop demonstrations of how guidewires, insulation, adjunctive catheters, and dielectric medium interact. For tissue traversal, all but the tip of traversing guidewires is insulated to concentrate current. For leaflet laceration, the "Flying V" configuration concentrates current at the inner lacerating surface of a kinked guidewire. Flooding the field with non-ionic dextrose eliminates alternative current paths. Clinical applications include traversing occlusions (pulmonary atresia, arterial and venous occlusion, and iatrogenic graft occlusion), traversing tissue planes (atrial and ventricular septal puncture, radiofrequency valve repair, transcaval access, Potts and Glenn shunts), and leaflet laceration (BASILICA, LAMPOON, ELASTA-Clip, and others). Tips are provided for optimizing these techniques. Transcatheter electrosurgery already enables a range of novel therapeutic procedures for structural heart disease, and represents a promising advance toward transcatheter surgery.

Recent Developments in Catheter-Based Cardiac Procedures

New developments in transcatheter valve technologies including aortic valve replacement and mitral valve and tricuspid valve interventions are described. Recent studies evaluating the success rate, patient outcomes, and anesthesiologic management of the procedures are discussed.

[Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an overview]

In recent years, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved from a treatment for patients who are inoperable or at high risk of surgical complications, to an equivalent alternative to surgical valve replacement for almost all patients with symptomatic, severe aortic valve stenosis. In the Netherlands, the number of patients who undergo TAVI gradually increases, while outcomes after TAVI improve and complication rates decrease. Before TAVI can be considered as the preferred treatment for aortic valve stenosis, however, additional insight is needed in valve durability, selection criteria for patients who benefit most from TAVI, and treatment outcomes regarding quality of life.

Primary Hemostatic Disorders and Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Periprocedural and late (>30 days) bleedings represent major complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and have been identified as potential areas for improved patient care.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to evaluate the impact of ongoing primary hemostasis disorders on late major/life-threatening bleeding complications (MLBCs).

METHODS

Bleedings were assessed according to the VARC-2 (Valve Academic Research Consortium-2) criteria. Closure time of adenosine diphosphate (CT-ADP), a surrogate marker of high molecular weight von Willebrand multimers proteolysis was assessed 24 h after the procedure. Ongoing primary hemostasis disorder was defined by a CT-ADP >180 s.

RESULTS

Among 372 patients who survived at 30 days, MLBCs occurred in 42 patients (11.3%) at a median follow-up of 383 days (interquartile range: 188 to 574 days). MLBCs were mainly of gastrointestinal origin (42.8%) and were associated with increased overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.10 to 10.31; p < 0.001) and cardiac mortality (HR: 11.62; 95% CI: 4.59 to 29.37; p < 0.001). A 2.5-fold elevation of MLBCs could be evidenced in patients with a CT-ADP > 180 s (27.4% vs. 11.5%; p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis identified paravalvular leak (PVL) (HR: 6.31; 95% CI: 3.43 to 11.60; p < 0.0001) and CT-ADP > 180 s (HR: 3.08; 95% CI: 1.62 to 5.81; p = 0.0005) as predictor of MLBCs.

CONCLUSIONS

MLBCs after transcatheter aortic valve replacement are frequent and associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. PVL and CT-ADP >180 s were identified as strong predictors for MLBCs. These findings strongly suggest that persistent HMW defects contribute to enhanced bleeding risk in patients with residual PVL.

Temporal trends in procedural death and need for urgent open surgery during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A single, high-volume center 10-year experience

BACKGROUND

Despite advancements in the safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) resulting in progressively wider indications, adverse periprocedural outcomes still raise concern. Real-world outcome data are thus of primary importance to evaluate the procedural risk-benefit trade-off in the continuously changing populations undergoing TAVR.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 1348 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR between 2007 and 2017. The primary endpoint was a composite of procedural mortality and need for conversion to emergent surgery, as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. Temporal trends in baseline characteristics and outcomes were evaluated. The independent outcomes predictors were assessed through multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 56 (4.1%) patients experienced the primary endpoint. 47 (3.5%) patients died during hospital stay, 19 (1.4%) within 72 h from the procedure. 17 patients (1.2%) needed an emergent conversion to open surgery, of whom 7 (41.2%) did not survive. Significant temporal trends of increasing mean age (from 79.4 ± 7.4 to 81 ± 7.5, p = 0.007) and decreasing surgical risk (mean STS: from 9 ± 9.5 to 7.1 ± 9.8, p = 0.010) were observed. When dichotomized at the median procedural date (year 2014), a significant reduction in the occurrence of the primary endpoint in more recent years was observed (3.0% vs 5.2%, p = 0.041). This was the single primary endpoint independent predictor at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The high-volume 10-year experience in TAVR procedures at our center shows encouraging trends in procedural mortality reduction, which anyhow still occurs at a non-negligible rate, calling for further research to detect and to blunt the determinant of early procedural events.

Bioprosthetic structural valve deterioration: How do TAVR and SAVR prostheses compare?

BACKGROUND

The durability of TAVR prostheses has come under major scrutiny since the move towards lower risk patients. We sought to compare the rate of structural valve deterioration (SVD) over time between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

METHODS

We included all TAVR and SAVR patients (age ≥ 75 years) that were performed in our centre from 2005 until 2015. Applying the internationally "agreed on" definitions of SVD, we surveyed all available serial echocardiographic follow-ups.

RESULTS

We included 269 TAVR and 174 SAVR cases. Post-intervention, TAVR patients had lower mean and peak gradients but higher rate of mild aortic regurgitation. SAVR patients had longer follow-up (in months, SAVR: 53 (30, 85) Vs TAVR: 33.4 (23, 52)). SVD as per Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) was similar between the two groups (TAVR 28% Vs SAVR 31%; P = 0.593) but moderate haemodynamic SVD (European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Intervention (EAPCI) criteria) was more common among SAVR cases (TAVR 11.5% Vs SAVR 20.7%; P = 0.007). Using Kaplan-Meier estimates, the rate of SVD over time was not different between the two groups as per VARC-2 criteria but different when moderate haemodynamic SVD criteria were applied (Log Rank P = 0.022) in favour of TAVR. The mean gradient rose steadily over time but more so post-SAVR (β = 0.52 ± 0.24 in comparison to TAVR at every given time point; P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Structural valve deterioration is common on long-term follow-up post-TAVR. The rate is similar to post-SAVR cases according to VARC-2 criteria but less according to the moderate haemodynamic SVD criteria.

[Initial Experience of a TAVI Program: Analysis of the Anesthetic Decision and its Evolution]

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a less invasive option for aortic valve replacement. The number of transcatheter aortic valve implantations under local anesthesia with sedation has been increasing as the team's experience increases and less invasive accesses are used. The aim of this study is to describe the evolution of the anesthetic technique in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation at our center over the years, as which was compared.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study in 149 consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Hospital Santa Marta (January 2010 to December 2016). Data was collected from the periprocedural records of patients. Patients were stratified according to anesthetic technique.

RESULTS

From our patients' sample, 57.0% were female, with median age 82 [58 - 95] years. Most patients underwent general anesthesia (68.5%). In the local anesthesia with sedation group there was a shorter duration of the procedure (120; [60 - 285] vs 155 [30 - 360]) and a lower number of patients requiring administration of vasopressors (61.8% vs 28.3%) - p < 0.05. There were no differences regarding length of hospital stay (9 [4 - 59] vs 10 [3 - 87]), periprocedural complications (66.0% vs 72.5%), readmission rate (4.3% vs 3.9%) or 30-days (2.1% vs 4.9%) and 1-year mortality (6.4% vs 7.8%) - p < 0.05. There was an increasing number of transcatheter aortic valve implantations performed under local anesthesia with sedation over the years.

DISCUSSION

The choice of anesthetic technique depends on the patient's characteristics, experience and preference of the team.

CONCLUSION

Local anesthesia with sedation seems to be associated with similar results as general anesthesia. The increase in the number of transcatheter aortic valve implantations under local anesthesia with sedation seems to follow the trend of lower invasiveness of the procedure.

Latest Advances in Transcatheter Cardiac Valvular Treatment

When the original monograph on valvular prostheses was published in Surgical Technology International, back in 1993, transcatheter technology had not yet been invented. These techniques have been gradually revealed in subsequent issues. When we first considered writing a paper that described both surgical and transcatheter prosthesis, we realized that such a combined paper would be impractically large. Therefore, we decided to split our survey into more than one paper. This paper seeks to address the paucity of information available regarding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and similar devices. This publication may serve as a reference point for critically organizing information on an evolving topic. The following article deals with the large number of transcatheter devices related to valvular and ventricular pathologies: TAVI for the aortic and mitral valves, with a focus on indications, techniques and complications, as well as specific aortic devices, and devices to treat mitral regurgitation with non-conventional access. Every effort has been made to make the content relevant and up-to-date, which proved to be particularly challenging due to the continuous technological evolution which characterizes this field.

Development of a Group Judgment Process for Forecasts of Health Care Innovations

IMPORTANCE

Health care costs have increased substantially over the past few decades, in part owing to the development and diffusion of new medical treatments. Forecasting potential future technologic innovations can allow for more informed planning.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the predictive validity of a structured formal method for forecasting future technologic innovations in health care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This pilot study combined an untested, unvalidated combination of a consensus process and group judgment process to evaluate forecasts made in 2001 for technologic innovations by 2021 in Alzheimer disease (AD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Six experts in AD and 7 experts in CVD composed the judgment group. The study was conducted in 2017-2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Year 2001 forecasts for 2021 that were judged by experts as being close to correct, directionally correct, or not correct, as well as innovations that occurred since 2001 that were not predicted.

RESULTS

Four forecasts of innovations in AD, each considered to be between 30% and 40% likely to be achieved by 2021, were judged to be close to correct. One forecast was considered to be directionally correct, with a likelihood of occurrence of 40%, in that it was overoptimistic. One innovation that occurred was missed: new imaging techniques (amyloid β plaque and tau tangle positron emission tomographic imaging). Five forecasts of CVD innovations were considered to be at least 50% likely to occur by 2021, and of these, 2 were judged to be close to correct, 1 was judged as being directionally correct, and 2 were judged as being not correct (although in one of these forecasts, the overarching innovation has been achieved but with a different noninvasive imaging modality). Of 7 additional forecasts considered to be less likely to be achieved by 2021, 4 were judged to be close to correct and 3 were judged as being directionally correct. Two innovations occurred but were missed: transcatheter aortic valve replacement and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Across both conditions, 15 of 17 innovations forecasted were judged to be close to correct or directionally correct, 2 were judged to be incorrect, and there were 3 missed innovations.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Expert elicitation provided a useful, but not fully accurate, lens into future innovation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Update in 2018

During the last 15 years, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has gained wide acceptance with good reproducible clinical and safety outcomes. Today, TAVI has not only overtaken conventional surgery as the standard of care for the treatment of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis at high surgical risk, but can also be considered in selected intermediate-risk patients. This follows technological improvements, better patient assessment and increased operator experience leading to a significant reduction in most procedure-related complications and long-term mortality. In this review, we provide internists, on the one hand with current data in the TAVI field including clinical outcomes from the most recent, major trials and on the other hand, highlight the remaining pitfalls of this treatment and the gaps in evidence that need to be addressed in order to further improve clinical practice and expand its indication.

Trends in Use of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement by Age

This study uses National Inpatient Sample data to characterize trends in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in age groups 55 years and older in the United States from 2012 to 2015.

Quantifying the Shift Toward Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement has expanded to include patients at intermediate- and low-risk cohorts. We sought to determine disease prevalence and treatment distribution including transcatheter aortic valve replacement eligibility in low-risk patients across 37 advanced economies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four systematic searches were conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database for studies evaluating disease prevalence, severity, decision making, and survival in patients with aortic stenosis. Estimates of disease prevalence and treatment eligibility were calculated using stochastic simulation and population data for the 37 countries comprising the International Monetary Fund's advanced economies index. Fifty-six studies comprising 42 965 patients were included across 5 domains: prevalence, severity, symptom status, treatment modality, and outcome. The pooled prevalence in the general population aged 60 to 74 years and >75 years was 2.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4%-4.1%) and 13.1% (95% CI, 8.2%-17.9%), respectively-corresponding to an estimated 16.1 million (95% CI, 12.2-20.3) people in 37 advanced economies. Of these, an estimated 3.2 million (95% CI, 2.2-4.4) patients have severe aortic stenosis with 1.9 million (95% CI, 1.3-2.6) eligible for surgical aortic valve replacement. There are ≈485 230 (95% CI, 284 550-66 7350) high-risk/inoperable patients, 152 690 (95% CI, 73 410-263 000) intermediate-risk patients, and 378 890 (95% CI, 205 130-610 210) low-risk patients eligible for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

With a prevalence of 4.5%, an estimated 16.1 million people aged ≥60 years across 37 advanced economies have aortic stenosis. Of these, there are ≈1.9 million patients eligible for surgical aortic valve replacement and 1.0 million patients eligible for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The New Standard in Patients With Previous Coronary Bypass Grafting?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess how the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has changed clinical practice and outcome in patients who have previously undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of patients admitted for aortic valve replacement have previously undergone CABG and are therefore at increased operative risk in case of redo surgery.

METHODS

In-hospital outcome data were analyzed from patients with or without previous CABG undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement or TAVR in Germany from 2007 to 2013.

RESULTS

In total, 32,581 TAVR and 55,992 surgical aortic valve replacement procedures were performed in patients with (n = 6,221) or without (n = 82,352) previous CABG. TAVR increased markedly in patients with previous CABG, from 18 procedures in 2007 to 1,191 in 2013, while surgical aortic valve replacement decreased in these patients from 471 to 179 procedures. In 2013, TAVR was the preferred therapy in almost 90% of patients with previous CABG. In-hospital mortality was increased in patients with previous CABG compared with those without (7.6% vs. 6.3% for TAVR and 7.2% vs. 2.6% for surgical aortic valve replacement). Bleeding and stroke rates were also increased with redo surgical aortic valve replacement procedures (with vs. without previous CABG: stroke, 3.2% vs. 1.8%; relevant bleeding, 29.6% vs. 13.4%; acute kidney injury, 4.2% vs. 2.9%), whereas this was not the case with TAVR (stroke, 2.1% vs. 2.6%; relevant bleeding, 7.3% vs. 8.3%; acute kidney injury, 6.3% vs. 5.4% respectively). A similar influence was seen in resource utilization (discharge destination home: TAVR after CABG, 51%; surgical aortic valve replacement after CABG, 31%).

CONCLUSIONS

Since its introduction in 2007, TAVR has been increasingly used in Germany in patients with previous CABG, and in-hospital outcome data support the trend away from redo surgery.

Impact of Transcatheter Technology on Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Volume, Outcomes, and Cost

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) represents a disruptive technology that is rapidly expanding in use. We evaluated the effect on surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) patient selection, outcomes, volume, and cost.

METHODS

A total of 11,565 patients who underwent SAVR, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (2002 to 2015), were evaluated from the Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative database. Patients were stratified by surgical era: pre-TAVR era (2002 to 2008, n = 5,113), early-TAVR era (2009 to 2011, n = 2,709), and commercial-TAVR era (2012 to 2015, n = 3,743). Patient characteristics, outcomes, and resource utilization were analyzed by univariate analyses.

RESULTS

Throughout the study period, statewide SAVR volumes increased with median volumes of pre-TAVR: 722 cases/year, early-TAVR: 892 cases/year, and commercial-TAVR: 940 cases/year (p = 0.005). Implementation of TAVR was associated with declining Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality among SAVR patients (3.7%, 2.6%, and 2.4%; p < 0.0001), despite increasing rates of comorbid disease. The mortality rate was lowest in the current commercial-TAVR era (3.9%, 4.3%, and 3.2%; p = 0.05), and major morbidity decreased throughout the time period (21.2%, 20.5%, and 15.2%; p < 0.0001). The lowest observed-to-expected ratios for both occurred in the commercial-TAVR era (0.9 and 0.9, respectively). Resource utilization increased generally, including total cost increases from $42,835 to $51,923 to $54,710 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

At present, SAVR volumes have not been affected by the introduction of TAVR. The outcomes for SAVR continue to improve, potentially due to availability of transcatheter options for high-risk patients. Despite rising costs for SAVR, open approaches still provide a significant cost advantage over TAVR.

Echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension probability is associated with clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIMS

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, diagnosis based on tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TRV) is often inaccurate and unreliable. The updated PH guidelines introduced a PH probability grading implementing additional PH signs on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), from which we aimed to analyse its effects on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 591 consecutive patients (mean age 80.2±8.4years, 58.0% female, mean STS risk score 6.2±3.8%) undergoing TAVI. Patients were divided into "low" (n=270; TRV ≤2.8m/s without additional PH signs), "intermediate" (n=131; TRV ≤2.8m/s with additional PH signs, or TRV 2.9-3.4m/s without additional PH signs), and "high" PH probability (n=190; TRV 2.9-3.4m/s with additional PH signs, or TRV >3.4m/s). The overall 30-day and 2-year mortality rates were 10.2% and 33.8%, respectively. "High" PH probability was an independent predictor of mortality at 30days (HR 3.68, 95% CI 2.03 to 6.67, p<0.01) and 2years (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.57 to 3.04, p<0.01), compared to "low" PH probability. The "intermediate" group did not show an increased risk. The presence of additional PH signs resulted in a significantly higher mortality at 30days (19.6% vs. 5.1%, p<0.01) and two years (54.2% vs. 22.5%, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The updated echocardiographic PH probability model incorporating additional PH signs independently predicts early and late mortality after TAVI. Additional PH signs are of great value in assessing one's risks since its presence is strongly associated with early and late mortality.

The use of imaging in new transcatheter interventions: an EACVI review paper

Transcatheter therapies for the treatment of valve heart diseases have expanded dramatically over the last years. The new developments and improvements in devices and techniques, along with the increasing expertise of operators, have turned the catheter-based approaches for valvular disease into an established treatment option. Various imaging techniques are used during these procedures, but echocardiography plays an essential role during patient selection, intra-procedural monitoring, and post-procedure follow-up. The echocardiographic assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter interventions places demands on echocardiographers that differ from those of the routine evaluation of patients with valve disease, and there is a need for specific expertise for those working in the cath lab. In the context of the current rapid developments and growing use of transcatheter valve therapies, this document intends to update the previous recommendations and address new advancements in imaging, particularly for those involved in any stage of the treatment of patients with valvular heart diseases.

Effect of Availability of Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement on Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Since the adoption of transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR), questions have been raised about its effect on clinical practice in comparison with the effect of surgical aortic-valve replacement, which is considered the current standard of care. Complete nationwide data are useful in examining how the introduction of a new technique influences previous clinical standards.

METHODS

We analyzed data on characteristics of patients and in-hospital outcomes for all isolated TAVR and surgical aortic-valve replacement procedures performed in Germany from 2007 to 2013.

RESULTS

In total, 32,581 TAVR and 55,992 surgical aortic-valve replacement procedures were performed. The number of TAVR procedures increased from 144 in 2007 to 9147 in 2013, whereas the number of surgical aortic-valve replacement procedures decreased slightly, from 8622 to 7048. Patients undergoing TAVR were older than those undergoing surgical aortic-valve replacement (mean [±SD] age, 81.0±6.1 years vs. 70.2±10.0 years) and at higher preoperative risk (estimated logistic EuroSCORE [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation], 22.4% vs. 6.3%, on a scale of 0 to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater risk and a score of more than 20% indicating high surgical risk). In-hospital mortality decreased in both groups between 2007 and 2013 (from 13.2% to 5.4% with TAVR and from 3.8% to 2.2% with surgical aortic-valve replacement). The incidences of stroke, bleeding, and pacemaker implantation (but not acute kidney injury) also declined.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of TAVR increased markedly in Germany between 2007 and 2013; the concomitant reduction in the use of surgical aortic-valve replacement was moderate. Patients undergoing TAVR were older and at higher procedural risk than those undergoing surgical aortic-valve replacement. In-hospital mortality decreased in both groups but to a greater extent among patients undergoing TAVR. (Funded by the Heart Center, Freiburg University.).