Combined Heart and Liver Transplantation Can Be Safely Performed With Excellent Short- and Long-Term Results

Tolerogenic Therapies in Cardiac Transplantation

Heart transplantation remains the gold-standard treatment for end-stage heart failure, yet long-term graft survival is hindered by chronic rejection and the morbidity and mortality caused by lifelong immunosuppression. While advances in medical and device-based therapies have reduced the overall need for transplantation, patients who ultimately require a transplant often present with more advanced disease and comorbidities. Recent advances in tolerance-inducing strategies offer promising avenues to improve allograft acceptance, while minimizing immunosuppressive toxicity. This review explores novel approaches aiming to achieve long-term immunological tolerance, including co-stimulation blockade, mixed chimerism, regulatory T-cell (Treg) therapies, thymic transplantation, and double-organ transplantation. These strategies seek to promote donor-specific unresponsiveness and mitigate chronic rejection. Additionally, expanding the donor pool remains a critical challenge in addressing organ shortages. Innovations such as ABO-incompatible heart transplantation are revolutionizing the field by increasing donor availability and accessibility. In this article, we discuss the mechanistic basis, clinical advancements, and challenges of these approaches, highlighting their potential to transform the future of heart transplantation with emphasis on clinical translation.

Heart-liver transplantation using the en bloc technique: A single-center experience over two decades

BACKGROUND

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is a definitive therapy reserved for patients with concomitant heart failure and advanced liver disease. A limited number of centers perform CHLT, and even fewer use the en bloc implantation technique. Here we review clinical outcomes and immunoprotective effects following CHLT and describe our institution's more than two decades of experience in performing the en bloc technique.

METHODS

All patients who underwent CHLT at our institution between January 2003 and July 2023 were identified. Recipient and donor characteristics, operative details, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate survival following CHLT.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients underwent CHLT using the en bloc technique at our institution between January 2003 and July 2023. At a median follow-up of 3.8 years for patients who survived the perioperative period (n = 18), estimated survival was 94% at 1 year and 75% at 5 years. There was 100% freedom from acute moderate rejection, acute severe rejection, and chronic rejection in all patients. No patients required retransplantation due to rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

CHLT is a definitive therapy reserved for patients with multiorgan dysfunction. At our institution, the en bloc technique is the preferred operative approach, as it minimizes cardiac insult, requires fewer anastomoses, minimizes cold ischemia time, and allows for rapid correction of coagulopathy. Overall survival for this cohort is excellent. Episodes of acute rejection were rare, providing further support for the idea that the liver may serve an immunoprotective role in multiorgan transplantation.

Simultaneous combined transplantation: Intricacies in immunosuppression management

Simultaneous combined transplantation (SCT), i.e. the transplantation of two solid organs within the same procedure, can be required when the patients develop more than one end-stage organ failure. The development of SCT over the last 20 years could only be possible thanks to progress in the surgical techniques and in the perioperative management of patients in an ageing population. Performing such major transplant surgeries from the same donor, in a short amount of time, and in critical pathophysiological conditions, is often considered to be counterbalanced by the immune benefits expected from these interventions. However, SCT includes a wide array of different transplant combinations, with each time a different immunological constellation. Recent research offers new insights into the immune mechanisms involved in these different settings. Progress in the understanding of these immunological intricacies help to address the optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive treatment strategies. In this review, we summarize the different immunological benefits according to the type of SCT performed. We also incorporate the main outcomes according to the immunological risk at transplantation, and the deleterious impact of preformed or de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in the different types of SCT. Finally, we propose comprehensive and evidence-based induction and maintenance immunosuppression strategies guided by the type of SCT.

Fontan-associated liver disease: the importance of multidisciplinary teamwork in its management

The Fontan operation, which directly connects the superior and inferior vena cava to the pulmonary artery, is a palliative surgery for children with a functional or anatomic single ventricle. This procedure leads to hemodynamic changes (Fontan circulation) in patients, who tend to develop congestive hepatic fibrosis characterized by sinusoidal fibrosis and dilatation beginning approximately 10 years after the procedure. In addition, in the context of severe fibrosis and cirrhosis, hepato-gastrointestinal complications including hepatocellular carcinoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and portal hypertension can arise. Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) encompasses the broad spectrum of liver alterations secondary to postoperative hemodynamic changes, and the effective management of FALD requires contributions from specialists in hepatology, gastroenterology, surgery, radiology, histopathology, and pediatric and adult cardiology. In this article, we outline the pathogenesis of FALD and discuss the importance of a multidisciplinary collaborative approach to its management.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Anesthesia for Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review

In 1984, 21 years after the first liver transplantation, Thomas Starzl achieved a milestone by performing the world's first combined heart-liver transplantation. While still uncommon, the practice of combined heart-liver transplants is on the rise globally. In this review, the authors delve into the current literature on this procedure, highlighting the evolving landscape and key considerations for anesthesiologists. Over the years, there has been a remarkable increase in the number of combined heart-liver transplantations conducted worldwide. This surge is largely attributed to the growing population of adult survivors with single-ventricle physiology, palliated with a Fontan procedure, who later present with late Fontan failure and Fontan-associated liver disease. Research indicates that combined heart-liver transplantation is an effective treatment option, with reported outcomes comparable with isolated heart or liver transplants. Managing anesthesia during a combined heart-liver transplant procedure is challenging, especially in the context of underlying Fontan physiology. International experience in this field remains somewhat limited, with most techniques derived from expert opinions or experiences with single-organ heart and liver transplants. These procedures are highly complex and performed infrequently. As the number of combined heart-liver transplants continues to rise globally, there is a growing need for clear guidance on periprocedural surgical and anesthetic management. Anesthesiologists overseeing these patients must consider multiple factors, balancing various comorbidities with significant hemodynamic and metabolic shifts. An increase in (multicenter) studies focusing on specific interventions to enhance patient and organ outcomes is anticipated in the coming years.

Combined Organ Transplantation in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease

Transplantation of the liver in combination with other organs is an increasingly performed procedure. Over the years, continuous improvement in survival could be realized through careful patient selection and refined organ preservation techniques, in spite of the challenges posed by aging recipients and donors, as well as the increased use of steatotic liver grafts. Herein, we revisit the epidemiology, allocation policies in different transplant zones, indications, and outcomes with regard to simultaneous organ transplants involving the liver, that is combined heart-liver, liver-lung, liver-kidney, and multivisceral transplantation. We address challenges surrounding combined organ transplantation such as equity, utility, and logistics of dual organ implantation, but also advantages that come along with combined transplantation, thereby focusing on molecular mechanisms underlying immunoprotection provided by the liver to the other allografts. In addition, the current standing and knowledge of machine perfusion in combined organ transplantation, mostly based on center experience, will be reviewed. Notwithstanding all the technical advances, shortage of organs, and the lack of universal eligibility criteria for certain multi-organ combinations are hurdles that need to be tackled in the future.

Review of pediatric combined heart-liver transplantation: A roadmap to success

BACKGROUND

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is a promising technique to address end stage organ failure in patients with concomitant heart failure and chronic liver disease. While most experience with CHLT has involved adult patients, the expanding population of children born with univentricular congenital heart disease who underwent the Fontan procedure and develop Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) has emerged as a growing indication for pediatric CHLT.

METHODS

Currently, CHLT is performed at a select subset of experienced transplant centers, especially in the pediatric population.

RESULTS

While technically demanding, CHLT may offer survival benefit when compared to heart transplant alone with decreased rejection of both synchronous allografts and equivalent outcomes with respect to waitlist time and post-operative complications. Limitations in the technique can be attributed to need for an appropriate multidisciplinary care center, challenges with donor organ availability and allocation, and the complexity associated with patient selection and peri-operative management.

CONCLUSION

In this review, we summarize the history of CHLT, discuss patient selection, and highlight key facets of peri-operative care in the pediatric population.

Combined Heart-Liver vs Isolated Heart Transplantation in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Despite an increasing number of adults with congenital heart disease undergoing combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT), there is a paucity of literature analyzing posttransplant outcomes. We analyzed the incidence and outcomes of congenital heart disease patients undergoing CHLT compared with those undergoing isolated heart transplantation (HT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of all adult (≥18 years) congenital heart disease patients undergoing CHLT or HT between 2000 and 2020 in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. The primary outcome was death at 30 days and 1 year after transplantation.

RESULTS

Of 1214 recipients included for analysis, 92 (8%) underwent CHLT and 1122 (92%) underwent HT. Patients undergoing CHLT and HT were similar in the distribution of age, sex, and serum bilirubin. Upon adjusted analysis with HT as the reference, undergoing CHLT was associated with a similar hazard of 30-day mortality between 2000 and 2017 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.12-2.08; P = .35) and 2018 and 2020 (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 0.88-6.13; P = .09). Similarly, there was no difference in the hazard of 1-year mortality for patients undergoing CHLT between 2000 and 2017 (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.22-1.63; P = .32) and 2018 and 2020 (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.66-3.53; P = .33) compared with HT.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of adults undergoing CHLT continues to rise. Given comparable survival outcomes between CHLT and HT, our findings demonstrate the former as a viable option for complex congenital heart disease patients with failing cavopulmonary circulation and associated liver disease. Future studies should delineate factors associated with early hepatic dysfunction to help identify congenital heart disease patients that would benefit from CHLT.

Dual-Organ Transplantation: Indications, Evaluation, and Outcomes for Heart-Kidney and Heart-Liver Transplantation: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Although heart transplantation is the preferred therapy for appropriate patients with advanced heart failure, the presence of concomitant renal or hepatic dysfunction can pose a barrier to isolated heart transplantation. Because donor organ supply limits the availability of organ transplantation, appropriate allocation of this scarce resource is essential; thus, clear guidance for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and simultaneous heart-liver transplantation is urgently required. The purposes of this scientific statement are (1) to describe the impact of pretransplantation renal and hepatic dysfunction on posttransplantation outcomes; (2) to discuss the assessment of pretransplantation renal and hepatic dysfunction; (3) to provide an approach to patient selection for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and simultaneous heart-liver transplantation and posttransplantation management; and (4) to explore the ethics of multiorgan transplantation.

Update on combined heart and liver transplantation: evolving patient selection, improving outcomes, and outstanding questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Combined heart and liver transplantation (CHLT) is an uncommon but increasingly performed procedure with rising need as the population who has undergone Fontan palliation for single ventricle physiology grows. This article reviews the current literature to summarize what is known about patient selection and outcomes and highlights the questions that remain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Congenital heart disease (CHD) with Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) has surpassed noncongenital heart disease as the most common indication for CHLT. In patients with failing Fontan physiology, accurate assessment of recoverability of liver injury remains challenging and requires multifaceted evaluation to determine who would benefit from isolated versus dual organ transplantation. Patient survival has improved over time without significant differences between those with and without a diagnosis of CHD. En bloc surgical technique and best use of intraoperative mechanical circulatory support are topics of interest as the field continues to evolve.

SUMMARY

A more refined understanding of appropriate patient selection and indication-specific outcomes will develop as we gain more experience with this complex operation and perform prospective, randomized studies.

Fontan-associated liver disease: Diagnosis, surveillance, and management

The Fontan operation is a lifesaving procedure for patients with functional single-ventricle congenital heart disease, where hypoplastic left heart syndrome is the most frequent anomaly. Hemodynamic changes following Fontan circulation creation are now increasingly recognized to cause multiorgan affection, where the development of a chronic liver disease, Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD), is one of the most important morbidities. Virtually, all patients with a Fontan circulation develop liver congestion, resulting in fibrosis and cirrhosis, and most patients experience childhood onset. FALD is a distinctive type of congestive hepatopathy, and its pathogenesis is thought to be a multifactorial process driven by increased nonpulsatile central venous pressure and decreased cardiac output, both of which are inherent in the Fontan circulation. In the advanced stage of liver injury, complications of portal hypertension often occur, and there is a risk of developing secondary liver cancer, reported at young age. However, FALD develops with few clinical symptoms, a surprisingly variable degree of severity in liver disease, and with little relation to poor cardiac function. The disease mechanisms and modifying factors of its development are still not fully understood. As one of the more important noncardiac complications of the Fontan circulation, FALD needs to be diagnosed in a timely manner with a structured monitoring scheme of disease development, early detection of malignancy, and determination of the optimal time point for transplantation. There is also a clear need for consensus on the best surveillance strategy for FALD. In this regard, imaging plays an important role together with clinical scoring systems, biochemical workups, and histology. Patients operated on with a Fontan circulation are generally followed up in cardiology units. Ultimately, the resulting multiorgan affection requires a multidisciplinary team of healthcare personnel to address the different organ complications. This article discusses the current concepts, diagnosis, and management of FALD, with special emphasis on the role of different imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression, as well as current recommendations for liver disease surveillance.

Incidence of acute rejection and patient survival in combined heart-liver transplantation

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is indicated for patients with concomitant end-stage heart and liver disease or patients with amyloid heart disease where liver transplantation mitigates progression. Limited data suggest that the liver allograft provides immunoprotection for heart and kidney allografts in combined transplantation from the same donor. We hypothesized that CHLT reduces the incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) compared with heart-alone transplantation (HA). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 32 CHLT and 280 HA recipients in a single-center experience. The primary outcome was incidence of ACR based on protocol and for-cause myocardial biopsy. Rejection was graded by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines with Grade 2R and higher considered significant. Secondary outcomes included the development of new DSAs, cardiac function, and patient and cardiac graft survival rates. Of CHLT patients, 9.7% had ACR compared with 45.3% of HA patients (p < 0.01). Mean pretransplant calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) levels were similar between groups (CHLT 9.4% vs. HA 9.5%; p = 0.97). Among patients who underwent testing, 26.9% of the CHLT and 16.7% of HA developed DSA (p = 0.19). Despite the difference in ACR, patient and cardiac graft survival rates were similar at 5 years (CHLT 82.1% vs. HA 80.9% [p = 0.73]; CHLT 82.1% vs. HA 80.9% [p = 0.73]). CHLT reduced the incidence of ACR in the cardiac allograft, suggesting that the liver offers immunoprotection against cellular mechanisms of rejection without significant impacts on patient and cardiac graft survival rates. CHLT did not reduce the incidence of de novo DSA, possibly portending similar long-term survival among cardiac allografts in CHLT and HA.

Two is better than one: when to consider multiorgan transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with end-stage heart failure often present with concomitant end-stage renal or end-stage liver disease requiring transplantation. There are limited data regarding the risks, benefits and long-term outcomes of heart-kidney (HKT) and heart-liver transplantation (HLT), and guidelines are mainly limited to expert consensus statements.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of HKT and HLT has steadily increased in recent years with favourable outcomes. Both single-centre and large database studies have shown benefits of HKT/HLT through improved survival, freedom from dialysis and lower rates of rejection and coronary allograft vasculopathy. Current guidelines are institution dependent and controversial due to the ethical considerations surrounding multiorgan transplantation (MOT).

SUMMARY

MOT is an effective and necessary option for patients with end-stage heart and kidney/liver failure. MOT is ethically permissible, and efforts should be made to consider eligible patients as early as possible to limit morbidity and mortality. Further research is needed regarding appropriate listing criteria and long-term outcomes.

Combined heart and liver transplantation: an updated systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Combined heart and liver transplantation (CHLT) is one of the most complex procedures of surgery that has been implemented in the last 35 years. The aim of our meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of CHLT.

MATERIALS

The meta-analysis was designed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) recommendations. A literature search was conducted up to April 2020 using the MEDLINE,® SCOPUS,® ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase™, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar™ databases.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 16 studies with 860 patients. The mortality rate following CHLT was 14.1%. One and five-year survival rates were 85.3% and 71.4% while the heart and liver rejection rates were 6.1% and 9.1% respectively. The hospital stay was 25.8 days and the intensive care unit stay was 9.9 days. Pooled values were also calculated for cardiopulmonary bypass duration, units of transfused red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma, postoperative infection rate, mechanical ventilation rate and follow-up duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its complexity, CHLT is a safe and effective procedure for the management of lethal diseases that lead to progressive heart and/or liver failure. Nevertheless, there must be strict adherence to the indications for surgery, and future studies should compare CHLT with isolated cardiac and hepatic transplantations.

Heterogeneity of liver fibrosis in patients with congestive hepatopathy: A biopsy and explant comparison series

PURPOSE

Patients with end-stage heart failure and concomitant irreversible liver injury may be candidates for combined heart liver transplant (CHLT). Determining appropriate candidates for CHLT is essential given organ scarcity. Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) is used to evaluate the severity of parenchymal liver injury in transplant candidates. In patients with congestive hepatopathy (CH), the fibrosis pattern may be heterogenous.

METHODS

We reviewed all CHLT cases between 2007 and 2017, as well as lone-heart transplant cases with post-mortem autopsy. Pre-transplant TJLB was compared to explant to assess the performance of biopsy fibrosis staging.

RESULTS

12 patients were included. Median age at time of transplant was 58 and the cohort was predominantly male (75%). Seven (64%) TJLB were predominantly stage 4 fibrosis and 4 (36%) were stage 1. Advanced fibrosis was the dominant pattern in 7 (70%) explants and 5 (50%) explants had heterogenous fibrosis. In 50% of CH cases, there was discordance between the TJLB and explant. In the autopsy cases, the TJLB and autopsy findings differed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of matched TJLB and explanted livers, we found variable performance of TJLB in predicting the predominant fibrosis stage present in the liver.

Operative Technique of Donor Organ Procurement for En Bloc Heart-liver Transplantation

Combined heart-liver transplant is an emerging option for patients with indications for heart transplantation and otherwise prohibitive hepatic dysfunction. Heart-liver transplantation is particularly relevant for patients with single ventricle physiology who often develop Fontan-associated liver disease and fibrosis. Although only performed at a limited number of centers, several approaches to combined heart-liver transplantation have been described. The en bloc technique offers several potential advantages over the traditional sequential technique. Specifically, en bloc heart-liver transplantation may allow improved hemodynamics, decreased bleeding, reduced liver allograft ischemic time, and may result in reduced rates of graft dysfunction. Here we describe our center's en bloc heart-liver procurement technique in detail, with the aim of allowing broader use and standardization of this technique.

Pediatric heart-liver transplant outcomes in the United States: A 25-year National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric HLT remains uncommon in the United States and criteria for HLT are unclear. The objectives of this study were to review the indications, and outcomes of pediatric HLT.

METHODS

Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients heart and liver databases were used to identify 9245 pediatric isolated heart transplants (PHT), 14 134 pediatric isolated liver transplant (PLT), and 20 pediatric HLT (16 patients underwent sHLT [same organ donor] and four patients with a history of PHT followed by PLT [different organ donors]; age ≤21 years) between 1992 and 2017. Outcomes included patient survival, and 1-year rates of acute heart and liver rejection.

RESULTS

The median age for pediatric HLT was 15.6 (IQR: 10.5, 17.9) years, and included 12 males (12/20 = 60%). In the HLT group, the most common indication for HT was CHD (12/20 = 60%), and the most common indication for liver transplant was cirrhosis (9/20 = 45%). The 1, 3, and 5 year actuarial survival rates in pediatric simultaneous HLT recipients (n = 16) were 93%, 93%, and 93%, respectively, and was similar to isolated PHT alone (88%, 81%, and 75.5%, respectively and isolated PLT alone (84%, 82%, and 80%), respectively. There was no heart or liver rejection reported in the HLT group versus 9.9% in heart and 10.6% in liver transplant-only groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric HLT is an uncommon but acceptable option for recipients with combined end-organ failure, with intermediate survival outcomes comparable to those of single-organ recipients.

Symptomatic Val122del mutated hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: Need for early diagnosis and prioritization for heart and liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis is an autosomal dominant disease linked to transthyretin gene mutations which cause instability of the transthyretin tetramer. After dissociation and misfolding they reassemble as insoluble fibrils (i.e. amyloid). Apart from the common Val30Met mutation there is a very heterogeneous group of non-Val30Met mutations. In some cases, the clinical picture is dominated by a rapidly evolving restrictive and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A case series of four liver recipients with the highly clinically relevant, rare and particularly aggressive Val122del mutation is presented. Medical and surgical therapeutic options, waiting list policy for ATTRv-amyloidosis, including the need for heart transplantation, and status of heart-liver transplantation are discussed.

RESULTS

Three patients needed a staged (1 patient) or simultaneous (2 patients) heart-liver transplant due to rapidly progressing cardiac failure and/or neurologic disability. Domino liver transplantation was impossible in two due to fibrotic hepatic transformation caused by cardiomyopathy. After a follow-up ranging from 3.5 to 9.5 years, cardiac (allograft) function was maintained in all patients, but neuropathy progressed in three patients, one of whom died after 80 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report in (liver) transplant literature about the rare Val122del ATTRv mutation. Due to its aggressiveness, symptomatic patients should be prioritized on the liver and, in cases with cardiomyopathy, heart waiting lists in order to avoid the irreversible neurological and cardiac damage that leads to a rapid lethal outcome.

Combined Heart-Liver and Domino Liver Transplantation in Familial Amyloidosis

BACKGROUND

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is the only curative option for patients with concomitant pathology affecting the heart and liver. In some cases, the native livers of familial amyloidosis (FA) patients may be suitable for domino transplantation into other recipients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis (2013 to 2019) of all CHLT at our center was performed. Continuous data were presented as mean with standard deviation and discrete variables as percentages.

RESULTS

Familial amyloidosis was the indication for CHLT in 5 out of 6 patients. The mean recipient age was 55 ± 5.62 years. Two patients were bridged with total artificial heart. The mean model for end-stage liver disease score at transplant was 17.17 ± 3.7. Two explanted livers were used for transplantation in a domino fashion. The median intensive care and hospital stays were 5.5 and 19 days, respectively. Complications included renal failure (1), groin abscess (1), pulmonary embolism (1), and cardiac rejection (1). Patient and graft survival for both organs was 100% at a median follow-up of 59 (range 20-76) months.

DISCUSSION

Combined heart-liver transplantation for FA achieves excellent outcomes. The possible use of livers explanted from patients with FA for domino liver transplantation can contribute to the liver donor pool.

Comparison of combined heart‒liver vs heart-only transplantation in pediatric and young adult Fontan recipients

BACKGROUND

Indications for a heart‒liver transplantation (HLT) for Fontan recipients are not well defined. We compared listing characteristics, post-operative complications, and post-transplant outcomes of Fontan recipients who underwent HLT with those of patients who underwent heart-only transplantation (HT). We hypothesized that patients who underwent HLT have increased post-operative complications but superior survival outcomes compared with patients who underwent HT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of Fontan recipients who underwent HLT or HT at a single institution. Characteristics at the time of listing, including the extent of liver disease determined by laboratory, imaging, and biopsy data, were compared. Post-operative complications were assessed, and the Kaplan‒Meier survival method was used to compare post-transplant survival. Univariate regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for increased mortality and morbidity among patients who underwent HT.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (9 for HLT, 38 for HT) were included. Patients who underwent HLT were older, were more likely to be on dual inotrope therapy, and had evidence of worse liver disease. Whereas ischemic time was longer for the group who underwent HLT, post-operative complications were similar. Over a median post-transplant follow-up of 17 (interquartile range: 5-52) months, overall mortality for the cohort was 17%; only 1 patient who underwent HLT died (11%) vs 7 patients who underwent HT (18%) (p = 0.64). Among patients who underwent HT, cirrhosis on pre-transplant imaging was associated with worse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite greater inotrope need and more severe liver disease at the time of listing, Fontan recipients undergoing HLT have post-transplant outcomes comparable with those of patients undergoing HT. HLT may offer a survival benefit for Fontan recipients with liver disease.

Heart-After-Liver Transplantation Attenuates Rejection of Cardiac Allografts in Sensitized Patients

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing heart transplantation, significant allosensitization limits access to organs, resulting in longer wait times and high waitlist mortality. Current desensitization strategies are limited in enabling successful transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to describe the cumulative experience of combined heart-liver transplantation using a novel heart-after-liver transplant (HALT) protocol resulting in profound immunologic protection.

METHODS

Reported are the results of a clinical protocol that was instituted to transplant highly sensitized patients requiring combined heart and liver transplantation at a single institution. Patients were dual-organ listed with perceived elevated risk of rejection or markedly prolonged waitlist time due to high levels of allo-antibodies. Detailed immunological data and long-term patient and graft outcomes were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 7 patients (age 43 ± 7 years, 86% women) with high allosensitization (median calculated panel reactive antibody = 77%) underwent HALT. All had significant, unacceptable donor specific antibodies (DSA) (>4,000 mean fluorescence antibody). Prospective pre-operative flow cytometric T-cell crossmatch was positive in all, and B-cell crossmatch was positive in 5 of 7. After HALT, retrospective crossmatch (B- and T-cell) became negative in all. DSA fell dramatically; at last follow-up, all pre-formed or de novo DSA levels were insignificant at <2,000 mean fluorescence antibody. No patients experienced >1R rejection over a median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile range: 25 to 68 months). There was 1 death due to metastatic cancer and no significant graft dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

A heart-after-liver transplantation protocol enables successful transplantation via near-elimination of DSA and is effective in preventing adverse immunological outcomes in highly sensitized patients listed for combined heart-liver transplantation.

Cardiac transplantation in adult congenital heart disease with prior sternotomy

BACKGROUND

Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients who require orthotopic heart transplantation are surgically complex due to anatomical abnormalities and multiple prior surgeries. In this study, we investigated these patients' outcomes using our institutional database.

METHODS

ACHD patients who had prior intracardiac repair and subsequent heart transplant were included (2008-2018). Adult patients without ACHD were extracted as a control. A comparison of patients with functional single ventricular (SV) and biventricular (BV) hearts was performed.

RESULTS

There were 9 SV and 24 BV patients. The SV group had higher central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (P = .028), hemoglobin concentration (P = .010), alkaline phosphatase (P = .022), and were more likely to have liver congestion (P = .006). Major complications included infection in 16 (48.5%), temporary dialysis in 12 (36.4%), and graft dysfunction requiring perioperative mechanical support in 7 (21.2%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 15.2%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a higher, but not statistically significant, survival after 10 years between the ACHD and control groups (ACHD 84.9% vs. control 67.5%, P = .429). There was no significant difference in 10-year survival between SV and BV groups (78% vs. 88%, P = .467).

CONCLUSIONS

Complex ACHD cardiac transplant recipients have a high incidence of early morbidities after transplantation. However, long-term outcomes were acceptable.

Considerations and experience driving expansion of combined heart-liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart transplantation concomitant with a liver transplant may be warranted when end-stage heart failure results in irreversible liver failure. Previously reported outcomes have been excellent yet the specific immunoprotective role of the liver allograft is not known. We review the current literature about the immunologic benefit for combined heart and liver transplantation (CHLT).

RECENT FINDINGS

The total number of combined heart and liver transplants continues to increase and accounts for approximately 25 cases per year. Familial amyloid polyneuropathy with cardiac cirrhosis is the most common indication for CHLT while adult congenital heart disease (CHD) with associated cirrhosis is increasing in frequency. The majority of recent registry data suggest a statistically equivalent to modestly improved survival advantage for CHLT compared with isolated heart transplantation. Direct mechanisms accounting for this survival advantage are not proven, but combined heart and liver transplants experience lower rates of acute cardiac rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV).

SUMMARY

Combined heart and liver transplants remain a small percentage of the total heart transplants worldwide, but the majority of recent literature confirms the safety and viability of this option for patients with end-stage heart and liver disease. Equivalent to modestly improved survival outcomes, lower rates of acute cardiac rejection and CAV warrant further investigation into the liver allograft's immunoprotective effect on the transplanted heart. The key mechanisms of tolerogenicity have important implications for surgical technique and immunosuppression requirements. Future directions include development of criteria for heart-liver transplant candidacy and identification of equitable allocation protocols.

Anesthesia for Combined Heart and Liver Transplantation

A heart or liver transplantation procedure performed in isolation itself presents multiple challenges for the perioperative team. Accordingly, combining both transplants yields a vastly more complicated surgery, with many unique multisystem and multidisciplinary considerations. Although combined heart and liver transplantations are being performed with increasing frequency, nationwide experience is relatively limited at most institutions. The aim of this review is to discuss the perioperative challenges presented to the anesthesiology teams and provide evidence-based guidance for the management of these daunting procedures.

Concomitant cardiac surgery and liver transplantation: an alternative approach in patients with end stage liver failure?

BACKGROUND

The results of cardiac surgery in patients with end-stage-liver-disease (ESLD) are poor. Concomitant cardiac surgery and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) may be an alternative treatment strategy in these patients.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2018, eight patients underwent concomitant cardiac surgery and OLT (Conc_OLT) in our institution. We analyzed their preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data and compared them to seven high risk patients with ESLD who underwent isolated cardiac surgery (Iso_Surg).

RESULTS

The two groups were not significantly different in terms of gender and age (Conc_OLT: 5 males, 55 ± 15 years, Iso_Surg: 4 males, 60 ± 10 years). Causes for ESLD were primary biliary cirrhosis (Conc_OLT = 1, Iso_Surg = 1), alcoholism (Conc_OLT = 2, Iso_Surg = 2), viral hepatitis (Conc_OLT = 2, Iso_Surg = 2), cryptogenic (Conc_OLT = 2, Iso_Surg = 1), ischemic (Conc_OLT = 1) and hepatocellular carcinoma (Iso_Surg = 1). Model for End-stage-Liver-Disease (MELD) Score (Conc_OLT = 14, Iso_Surg = 13) and Child-Pugh Score (Conc_OLT = 9.5, Iso_Surg = 8) were not significantly different between the two groups. Median logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) was 9.5% (Conc_OLT) and 7.1% (Iso_Surg). Cardiac procedures undertaken were aortic valve replacement (Conc_OLT = 6, Iso_Surg = 3), coronary bypass grafting (Conc_OLT = 1,Iso_Surg = 2), tricuspid valve repair (Conc_OLT = 1), combined aortic and mitral valve replacement (Iso_Surg = 1) and excision of atrial myxoma (Iso_Surg = 1). Median length of in-hospital-stay was longer in the Conc_OLT group (73 vs. 42 days; p = 0.11). At 3 months, in-hospital mortality was 25% in the Conc_OLT group (n = 2) and lower compared to 71% observed in the Iso_Surg group (n = 5, p = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant cardiac surgery and OLT is a promising alternative compared to isolated cardiac surgery in high risk patients with ESLD. Given the high operative mortality of cardiac surgery in patients with ESLD, the complex peri-operative management of these patients should be performed in an interdisciplinary team with an expert team of liver specialists involved.

Combined Cardiothoracic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Versus Isolated Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Combined cardiothoracic surgery and liver transplantation (cCSLT) recently increasingly has been used. Despite that, liver transplant immediately after cardiothoracic surgery has not been well-characterized. The authors aimed to compare perioperative management and postoperative outcomes between patients undergoing cCSLT and isolated liver transplantation (iLT).

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

University tertiary medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five cCSLT patients and 1091 iLT patients at a single institution from 2010 to 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Twenty-five cCSLT patients were compared with 100 randomly selected and 100 propensity-matched iLT patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All cCSLT patients underwent comprehensive preoperative evaluation by a multidisciplinary team. Of 25 cardiothoracic surgeries, heart transplant (n = 9) was most common, followed by coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 5) and lung transplant (n = 3). Intraoperative management of cCSLT was provided by 2 separate teams, one for cardiothoracic surgery and one for liver transplantation. Patients undergoing cCSLT often required cardiopulmonary bypass, an intra-aortic balloon pump, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or cardiac pharmacologic therapies and, additionally, needed more interventions including antifibrinolytic administration, venovenous bypass, massive blood transfusion, and platelet transfusions compared with iLT patients. Ninety-day survival rates were similar in the cCSLT (100%) and iLT groups (random iLT 87% and matched iLT 93%, log-rank test p = 0.089).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite having end-stage liver disease and advanced cardiothoracic disorders and experiencing a complex intraoperative course, cCSLT patients had comparable 90-day survival to iLT patients. Comprehensive planning before transplant, optimal patient/donor selection, the multiple-team model, and meticulous intraoperative management are critical to the success of cCSLT.

Anesthetic considerations for combined heart--liver transplantation in patients with Fontan-associated liver disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The success of the Fontan procedure has led to increased survival of patients born with certain congenital heart disease to the point that new sequlae, as a result of Fontan circulation, are being discovered. Included among these is Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD). The purpose of this review is to present available literature on the perioperative management of the combined heart--liver transplantation (CHLT) in patients with FALD.

RECENT FINDINGS

The perioperative management of a combined heart-liver transplant in a patient with Fontan circulation is complex. The patient is at risk for hemodynamic disturbances, significant blood loss, coagulopathies, and metabolic derangements. The maintenance of an appropriate transpulmonary pressure gradient is paramount to success. Postoperative management should be accomplished by a multidisciplinary care team. Limited series have demonstrated good outcomes in patients who have undergone CHLT.

SUMMARY

The perioperative management of CHLT in patients with FALD is complex and available literature is limited. Future studies are needed to further assess proper perioperative management of patients with FALD who undergo CHLT.

Fontan-Associated Liver Disease: Screening, Management, and Transplant Considerations

Surgical innovation and multidisciplinary management have allowed children born with univentricular physiology congenital heart disease to survive into adulthood. An estimated global population of 70 000 patients have undergone the Fontan procedure and are alive today, most of whom are <25 years of age. Several unexpected consequences of the Fontan circulation include Fontan-associated liver disease. Surveillance biopsies have demonstrated that virtually 100% of these patients develop clinically silent fibrosis by adolescence. As they mature, there are increasing reports of combined heart-liver transplantation resulting from advanced liver disease, including bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, in this population. In the absence of a transplantation option, these young patients face a poor quality of life and overall survival. Acknowledging that there are no consensus guidelines for diagnosing and monitoring Fontan-associated liver disease or when to consider heart transplantation versus combined heart-liver transplantation in these patients, a multidisciplinary working group reviewed the literature surrounding Fontan-associated liver disease, with a specific focus on considerations for transplantation.

Liver transplantation and cardiac illness: Current evidences and future directions

Contraindications to liver transplantation are gradually narrowing. Cardiac illness and chronic liver disease may manifest independently or may be superimposed on each other due to shared pathophysiology. Cardiac surgery involving the cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with Child-Pugh Class C liver disease is associated with a high risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Liver transplantation involves hemodynamic perturbations, volume shifts, coagulation abnormalities, electrolyte disturbances, and hypothermia, which may prove fatal in patients with cardiac illness depending upon the severity. Additionally, cardiovascular complications are the major cause of adverse postoperative outcomes after liver transplantation even in the absence of cardiac pathologies. Clinical decision-making has remained an unsettled issue in these clinical scenarios. The absence of randomized clinical studies has further crippled our endeavours for a consensus on the management of patients with end-stage liver disease with cardiac illness. This review seeks to address this complex clinical setting by gathering information from published literature. The management algorithm in this review may facilitate clinical decision making and augur future research.

Indications and outcomes of combined heart-liver transplant: A systematic review and met-analysis

BACKGROUND

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) has become a viable option for treating concomitant heart and liver failure. However, data are lacking with respect to long-term outcomes.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed to identify all studies on CHLT. Following application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of seven studies consisting of 99 CHLT patients were included from the original 1864 articles.

RESULTS

CHLT recipient mean age was 53.0 years (95% CI 48.0-58.0), 67.5% of which (95% CI 56.5-76.9) were male. 65.5% (95% CI 39.0-85.0) of patients developed heart failure due to amyloidosis whereas 21.6% (95% CI 12.3-35.2) developed heart failure due to congenital causes. The most common indication for liver transplant was amyloidosis [65.5% (95% CI 39.0-85.0)] followed by liver failure due to hepatitis C [13.8% (95% CI 2.1-54.4)]. The mean intensive care unit length of stay was 8 days (95% CI 5-11) with a mean length of stay of 24 days (95% CI 17-31). Cardiac allograft rejection within the first year was 24.7% (95% CI 9.5-50.7), including antibody mediated [5% (95% CI 1.7-15.2)] and T-cell mediated rejection [22.7% (95% CI 8.8-47.1)]. Overall survival was 87.5% (95% CI 78.6-93.0) at 1 year and 84.3% (95% CI 75.4-90.5) at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

CHLT in select patients with coexisting end-stage heart and liver failure appears to offer high survival and low rejection rates.

2019 Clinical Update in Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation continues be the standard for treatment of end-stage liver disease, and even with recent advances in organ preservation, the anesthetic management continues to require understanding of multiple organ systems beyond the liver. Multiple factors contribute to hemodynamic changes after reperfusion of the liver graft that anesthesiologists should be aware of before unclamping. Concomitant renal dysfunction in end-stage liver disease is not uncommon, and preparation for continuous renal replacement therapy may need to be considered in certain cases. Cardiac evaluation of liver transplantation patients with an emphasis on arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, can help prevent both intraoperative and postoperative complications detrimental to the patient and graft. Finally, combined liver and thoracic organ transplantations may be indicated for certain disease processes that affect multiple organs. These cases require an understanding of the surgical technique and acknowledgment that some goals of the procedures may be in direct opposition to each other.

Heterogeneity of Fibrosis in Liver Biopsies of Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing Heart Transplant Evaluation

Liver biopsies are commonly performed in heart transplant candidates to confirm congestive hepatopathy (CH) and to assess the degree of fibrosis. Heterogeneity of fibrosis is frequent in CH, making it difficult to stage fibrosis. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of heterogeneity of fibrosis and nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) in liver biopsies with CH secondary to heart failure. Fifty liver biopsies with CH secondary to heart failure were reviewed. The fibrosis was scored on trichrome stain as follows: stage 0 for no fibrosis, stage 1 for zone 3 fibrosis, stage 2 for zone 3 and portal fibrosis, stage 3 for bridging fibrosis, and stage 4 for cirrhosis. Both stage 3 and stage 4 fibrosis were classified as advanced fibrosis. A predominant pattern of fibrosis and a secondary pattern of fibrosis, defined as a different stage of fibrosis seen in at least 10% of the biopsy material, if present, were recorded. A biopsy was considered to show heterogenous fibrosis if there was at least a 2 stage difference between the predominant and secondary patterns. Thirteen biopsies (26%) showed heterogenous fibrosis. Sixteen biopsies (32%) showed some evidence of advanced fibrosis: 5 had uniform advanced fibrosis, 4 had predominant pattern of advanced fibrosis, and advanced fibrosis was focal in 7 biopsies from 6 patients. NRH-type changes were seen in 9 of 50 biopsies (18%). In conclusion, our study showed heterogenous fibrosis in the liver biopsy of a quarter of patients with CH due to heart failure, highlighting the limitations of fibrosis assessment in the biopsies, and suggests that correlation with the complete clinical information is essential for management decisions.

Transplant-Amenable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Fontan Patient

The Fontan circulation alters a patient's physiology and imparts long-term risks related to chronically elevated systemic venous pressure. An increasing number of patients with Fontan physiology are surviving into adulthood and are at risk of hepatic sequalae. The ideal timeline and method of hepatic surveillance in the Fontan population remains to be defined. In this case, the patient was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma more than 20 years after undergoing the Fontan procedure and was a candidate for combined heart-liver transplant. That her disease progressed prior to organ availability supports the argument for hepatic surveillance in this population.

Short-term outcomes of en bloc combined heart and liver transplantation in the failing Fontan

Patients with failing Fontan physiology and liver cirrhosis are being considered for combined heart and liver transplantation. We performed a retrospective review of our experience with en bloc combined heart and liver transplantation in Fontan patients > 10 years old from 2006 to 18 per Institutional Review Board approval. Six females and 3 males (median age 20.7, range 14.2-41.3 years) underwent en bloc combined heart and liver transplantation. Indications for heart transplant included ventricular dysfunction, atrioventricular valve regurgitation, arrhythmia, and/or lymphatic abnormalities. Indication for liver transplant included portal hypertension and cirrhosis. Median Fontan/single ventricular end-diastolic pressure was 18/12 mm Hg, respectively. Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding International Normalized Ratio score was 10 (7-26), eight patients had a varices, ascites, splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia score of ≥ 2, and all patients had cirrhosis. Median cardiopulmonary bypass and donor ischemic times were 262 (178-307) and 287 (227-396) minutes, respectively. Median intensive care and hospital stay were 19 (5-96) and 29 (13-197) days, respectively. Survival was 100%, and rejection was 0% at 30 days and 1 year post-transplant. En bloc combined heart and liver transplantation is an acceptable treatment in the failing Fontan patient with liver cirrhosis.

Heart-Kidney and Heart-Liver Transplantation Provide Immunoprotection to the Cardiac Allograft

BACKGROUND

Prior single-center studies suggest that kidney and liver allografts are immunoprotective toward transplanted hearts. The broader effects of the simultaneous transplantation of kidney or liver on protection from rejection are unclear.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database for heart transplantation was queried from 1987 to 2015 and stratified into patients undergoing heart-liver transplantation (HLT) (n = 192), heart-kidney transplantation (HKT) (n = 1,174), and heart-only transplantation (HT) (n = 61,471). Perioperative and follow-up data were compared between HT versus HLT and HT versus HKT groups using analysis of variance (continuous), chi-square test (categorical), and Kaplan-Meier curves (survival).

RESULTS

HKT patients were older (51.2 ± 13.4 years of age) compared with HT patients (45.6 ± 19.2 years of age; p < 0.0001), with higher rate of diabetes (33.8% versus 14.8%; p < 0.0001) and dialysis (49.7% versus 2.1%; p < 0.0001). HKT (46.2%) and HLT (49.5%) patients had more urgent need for transplantation (status 1A) compared with HT patients (32%; p < 0.0001). Acute rejection episodes before discharge were lower in the HLT group (7.1% versus 3.1%; p = 0.03). Ten-year patient survivals were similar for HT (53.6%) versus HKT (56.7%) (p = 0.13) versus HLT (60.4%) (p = 0.09). Treatment for rejection during the first posttransplant year was lower in HLT (2.1%) and HKT (8.4%) compared with HT (17.4%) (p < 0.0001 for both). Cox multivariate analysis showed that cardiac allograft survival was improved in HKT (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.70; p < 0.0001). Additionally, HKT (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.60; p < 0.0001) and HLT (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.39; p < 0.0001) were associated with improved freedom from rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Nationally, HKT and HLT have equivalent postoperative outcomes as HT. Simultaneous kidney or liver transplantation confers an improved clinical and immunologic outcome.

Dual organ transplant

With heart failure epidemic raging in full fury, an increasing number of end-stage heart failure patients are presenting with cirrhosis of the liver. Simultaneous heart and liver transplant is an attractive option for these patients. Moreover, liver transplant provides synergism by reducing immunorejection of the heart. Dr. Atluri in conversation with Dr. Yadava discusses the indications, sequencing, protocols, and results of double organ transplantation.

Simultaneous Versus Sequential Heart-liver Transplantation: Ideal Strategies for Organ Allocation

Background

Simultaneous heart-liver (SHL) transplantation is an efficacious therapeutic modality for patients with combined heart and liver failure. However, the extent to which heart transplantation followed by sequential liver transplantation (LAH) can match the benefit of simultaneous transplantation has not previously been examined. Our objective was to determine if LAH offers comparable survival to SHL.

Methods

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file was queried for adult recipients waitlisted for both heart and liver transplantation. The United Network for Organ Sharing thoracic and liver databases were linked to facilitate examination of waitlist and transplant characteristics for simultaneously listed patients. Univariate survival analysis was used to determine overall survival.

Results

Of the 236 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 200 underwent SHL, 7 sequentially underwent LAH, and 29 received heart transplantation only (isolated orthotopic heart transplantation [iOHT]). Recipients of SHL were less likely to have an episode of acute rejection before discharge (LAH, 14.2%; SHL, 2.4%; iOHT, 3.6%; P = .019) or be treated for acute rejection within 1 year after transplantation (LAH, 14.3%; SHL, 2.5%; iOHT, 13.8%; P = .007). Otherwise, postoperative hospital length of stay, stroke, need for dialysis, and need for pacemaker placement were comparable across groups. Ten-year survival similarly favored both LAH and SHL over iOHT (LAH: 100%, 71.4%, 53.6%; SHL: 87.1%, 80.4%, 52.1%, iOHT: 70.1%, 51.6%, 27.5% for 1-, 5-, and 10-year survivals, respectively, P = .003). However, median time between heart and liver transplant was 302 days in patients undergoing sequential transplantation.

Conclusions

Although transplantation in a simultaneous or sequential fashion yields equivalent outcomes, a high fraction of patients undergoing initial heart transplant alone fail to proceed to subsequent liver transplantation. Therefore, in patients with combined heart and liver failure with a projected need for 2 allografts, simultaneous transplantation is associated with maximum benefit.