Perioperative Characteristics and Outcomes of Fontan Versus Non-Fontan Patients Undergoing Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is becoming increasingly frequent as a maturing population of patients with Fontan-palliated congenital heart disease develop advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. The authors present their experience with CHLT for congenital and noncongenital indications, and identify characteristics associated with poor outcomes that may guide intervention in high-risk patients.

DESIGN

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 16 consecutive adult recipients of CHLT at the authors' institution between April 2017 and February 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Eleven patients underwent transplantation for Fontan indications, and 5 were transplanted for non-Fontan indications.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Compared with non-Fontan patients, Fontan recipients had longer cardiopulmonary bypass duration (199 v 119 minutes, p =m0.002), operative times (786 v 599 minutes, p = 0.01), and larger blood product transfusions (15.4 v 6.3 L, p = 0.18). Six of 16 patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), of whom 4 were Fontan patients who subsequently died. Patients who required ECMO had lower 5-hour lactate clearance (0.0 v 3.5 mmol/L, p = 0.001), higher number of vasoactive infusions, lower pulmonary artery pulsatility indices (0.58 v 1.77, p = 0.03), and higher peak inspiratory pressures (28.0 v 18.5 mmHg, p = 0.01) after liver reperfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined heart-liver transplantation in patients with Fontan-associated end-organ disease is particularly challenging and associated with higher recipient morbidity compared with non-Fontan-related CHLT. Early hemodynamic intervention for signs of ventricular dysfunction may improve outcomes in this growing high-risk population.

Update on combined heart and liver transplantation: evolving patient selection, improving outcomes, and outstanding questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Combined heart and liver transplantation (CHLT) is an uncommon but increasingly performed procedure with rising need as the population who has undergone Fontan palliation for single ventricle physiology grows. This article reviews the current literature to summarize what is known about patient selection and outcomes and highlights the questions that remain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Congenital heart disease (CHD) with Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) has surpassed noncongenital heart disease as the most common indication for CHLT. In patients with failing Fontan physiology, accurate assessment of recoverability of liver injury remains challenging and requires multifaceted evaluation to determine who would benefit from isolated versus dual organ transplantation. Patient survival has improved over time without significant differences between those with and without a diagnosis of CHD. En bloc surgical technique and best use of intraoperative mechanical circulatory support are topics of interest as the field continues to evolve.

SUMMARY

A more refined understanding of appropriate patient selection and indication-specific outcomes will develop as we gain more experience with this complex operation and perform prospective, randomized studies.

A contemporary systematic review on liver transplantation for unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer

The 5-year overall survival rate of a patient with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer is poor at approximately 14%. Similarly, historical data on liver transplantation (LT) in those with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) showed poor outcomes, with 5-year survival rates between 12% and 21%. More recently, limited data have shown improved outcomes in select patients with 5-year overall survival rates of approximately 60%. Despite these reported survival improvements, there is no significant improvement in disease-free survival. Given the uncertain benefit with this therapeutic approach and a renewed investigational interest, we aimed to conduct a contemporary systematic review on LT for CRLM. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis statement. English articles reporting on data regarding LT for CRLM were identified through the MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases (last search date: December 16th, 2021) by 2 researchers independently. A total of 58 studies (45 published and 13 ongoing) were included. Although early retrospective studies suggest the possibility that some carefully selected patients may benefit from LT, there is minimal prospective data on the topic and LT remains exploratory in the setting of CRLM. Additionally, several other challenges, such as the limited availability of deceased donor organs and defining appropriate selection criteria, remain when considering the implementation of LT for these patients. Further evidence from ongoing prospective trials is needed to determine if and to what extent there is a role for LT in patients with surgically unresectable CRLM.

Liver-Directed and Systemic Therapy Options for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Liver transplant and resection are preferable for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma, but ultimately, tumor location, biology, and patient condition dictate treatment decisions. At the NCCN 2022 Annual Conference, a panel of experts used 3 case studies to develop an evidence-based approach to the treatment of similar patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Moderated by Daniel B. Brown, MD, FSIR, the session focused on current research regarding liver-directed and systemic therapy options.

Adult Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation: The United States Experience

Background: We aimed to review the indications and outcomes of adults undergoing combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) in the US using national registry data.

Methods: Adult (≥18 years) CHLT recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included (09/1987–09/2020; era 1 = 1989–2000, era 2 = 2001–2010, era 3 = 2011–2020). Survival analysis was conducted by means of Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression.

Results: We identified 369 adults receiving CHLT between 12/1989–08/2020. The number of adult CHLT recipients (R² = 0.75, p < 0.001) and centers performing CHLT (R² = 0.80, p < 0.001) have increased over the study period. The most common cardiac diagnosis in the first two eras was restrictive/infiltrative cardiomyopathy, while the most common in era 3 was congenital heart disease (p = 0.03). The 1-, 3-, and 5-years patient survival was 86.8, 80.1, and 77.9%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, recipient diabetes [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.23–4.48], CHLT between 1989-2000 compared with 2011–2020 (aHR = 5.00, 95% CI: 1.13–22.26), and sequential-liver first CHLT compared with sequential-heart first CHLT (aHR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.15–5.18) were associated with increased risk of mortality. Higher left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with decreased risk of mortality (aHR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.99).

Conclusion: CHLT is being increasingly performed with evolving indications. Excellent outcomes can be achieved with multidisciplinary patient and donor selection and surgical planning.

Waitlist mortality and post-liver transplant outcomes of pediatric patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatoblastoma in the United States

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is offered in cases of advanced disease for both pediatric patients with hepatoblastoma (HBL) and those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Current United States organ allocation priorities differ between the two groups.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the waitlist and posttransplant outcomes of pediatric LT candidates with HBL and HCC using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry (February 2002 to September 2020).

RESULTS

Six hundred sixty-eight children with HBL and 95 children with HCC listed for first LT were identified. Patients with HBL were younger (p < .001), had lower laboratory Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD)/Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) scores (p < .001), and had lesser proportion with encephalopathy (p = .01). Patients with HCC had an increased risk of waitlist mortality in univariable (unadjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 4.37, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-9.51, p < .001) and multivariable competing risk regression (adjusted sHR = 3.08, 95% CI 1.13-8.37, p = .03) accounting for age and laboratory MELD/PELD score. Five hundred ninety-five children underwent LT for HBL and 76 for HCC. Patients transplanted for HBL had a significantly higher proportion with status 1B exception (71.3% vs. 7.9%, p < .001). No difference was observed in patient (unadjusted log-rank test, p = .52; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.40-1.48, p = .43) or graft survival (unadjusted log-rank test, p = .93; adjusted HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.42-1.33, p = .32) between HCC and HBL recipients.

CONCLUSION

Waitlist mortality for pediatric LT candidates with HCC is significantly higher than for HBL, while posttransplant patient and graft survival are similar. This highlights an opportunity to improve equitable prioritization for children with HCC who may have reduced access to size-appropriate deceased donor organs and less effective bridge-to-transplant therapies.

Applicability of the UK DCD Risk Score in the modern era of liver transplantation: a U.S. update

Careful graft and recipient selection have resulted in improved outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) using donation after cardiac death (DCD) organs. The UK DCD Risk Score was established as a risk stratification tool to guide selection. We evaluated the applicability of the UK DCD Risk Score in a contemporary US cohort of adult DCD LT recipients using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry (2011-2020). 3,899 DCD LTs were included in our study (UK DCD Risk Score 0-5 points: 1,438 [36.9%], 6-9 points: 1,920 [49.2%]; 10-20 points: 541 [13.9%]). Compared to a score of 6-9 points, a score of 0-5 points was associated with decreased risk of graft loss (HR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.68-0.94, P = 0.006), while a score of 10-20 points was associated with increased risk of graft loss (HR = 1.23, 95%CI: 1.01-1.51, P = 0.04). The 5-year graft survival for patients with risk scores of 0-5, 6-9, and 10-20 were 75.9%, 71.7%, and 67.9%, respectively. The C-statistic for the UK DCD Risk Score in our contemporary cohort was 0.611. The UK DCD Risk Score demonstrates a more limited ability to differentiate recipient outcomes in the modern era of DCD LT in the US. Acceptable long-term outcomes are achievable for patients stratified to the highest-risk group. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Liver Transplantation in Children with Urea Cycle Disorders: The Importance of Minimizing Waiting Time

Liver transplantation (LT) for children with urea cycle disorders (UCDs) is capable of correcting the enzymatic defect and preventing progressive neurologic injury. We describe the characteristics and outcomes of pediatric LT recipients with UCDs. We identified all pediatric (<18 years) LT candidates with UCDs in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database (February 2002 to September 2020). Multivariable Cox and logistic regression were used to determine risk factors for graft loss and cognitive delay, respectively. Of 424 patients, 1.9% (8/424) experienced waitlist mortality and 95.0% underwent LT (403/424). The most frequently encountered UCDs in our cohort were ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (46.2%), citrullinemia (20.3%), and argininosuccinic aciduria (ASA; 12.9%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 90.4%, 86.3%, and 85.2%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed a decreased risk of graft loss with increasing weight at LT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.99; P = 0.02), male sex (aHR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.85; P = 0.01), and ASA diagnosis (aHR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.98; P = 0.047), when adjusting for location (intensive care/hospital/home) and graft type (both P ≥ 0.65). In multivariable logistic regression, waitlist time (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = 0.009) and male sex (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.02-2.88; P = 0.04) were associated with increased odds of long-term cognitive delay. Waitlist duration is associated with a long-term risk of cognitive delay. Given excellent long-term outcomes, early LT evaluation should be considered in all children with UCDs to prevent progressive neurologic injury and optimize cognitive outcomes.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma in liver transplant recipients: a case series

Background:

Malignancy is one of the known leading causes of death among long-term liver transplantation (LT) survivors. Pancreatic cancer has an incidence of 7.6/100,000 in North America and constitutes a diagnostic challenge post-LT.

Methods:

This is a single-center, retrospective review of the electronic health records (EHRs) of LT recipients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (1990–2019). The prevalence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in our institutional non-LT population was assessed using an institutional de-identified database (Synthetic Derivative).

Results:

Six out of 2,232 (0.27%) LT recipients were diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Median age at diagnosis was 66.0 years (IQR, 57.8–71.8 years). Median time from LT to pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis was 8.9 years (IQR, 4.7–16.2 years), the median size on imaging was 3.2 cm (IQR, 3.1–4.7 cm), and all tumors were located on the head of the pancreas. Three patients underwent surgical resection (one with adjuvant chemotherapy), two underwent palliative care, and one palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine and abraxane. Over a median follow-up of 220.5 days (IQR, 144.8–399.5 days), all six patients died due to disease progression (100%). Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 5,033 out of 2,484,772 (0.20%) individuals in the Synthetic Derivative.

Conclusions:

Our findings identified an increased incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma following LT compared to the general population.

Liver Transplantation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of Survival Rates

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a contraindication to liver transplantation in most centers worldwide. Therefore, only a few such cases have been performed in each individual center, and the need for a systematic review and meta-analysis to cumulatively pool these results is apparent.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement (end-of-search date: May 29, 2020). Meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to pool the overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall recurrence rates using the random-effects model. Meta-regression was used to examine cirrhosis and incidental diagnosis as confounders on OS and RFS.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies comprising 355 patients and a registry study of 385 patients were included. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-y OS rates were 75% (95% CI, 64%-84%), 56% (95% CI, 46%-67%), and 42% (95% CI, 29%-55%), respectively. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-y RFS rates were 70% (95% CI, 63%-75%), 49% (95% CI, 41%-57%), and 38% (95% CI, 27%-50%), respectively. Cirrhosis was positively associated with RFS, while incidental diagnosis was not. Neither cirrhosis nor incidental diagnosis was associated with OS. The pooled overall recurrence rate was 43% (95% CI, 33%-53%) over a mean follow-up of 40.6 ± 37.7 mo. Patients with very early (single ≤2 cm) iCCA exhibited superior pooled 5-y RFS (67%; 95% CI, 47%-86%) versus advanced iCCA (34%; 95% CI, 23%-46%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cirrhotics with very early iCCA or carefully selected patients with advanced iCCA after neoadjuvant therapy may benefit from liver transplantation under research protocols.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes After Deceased Donor Split Versus Whole Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To mitigate waiting time forlivertransplant for hepatocellular carcinoma, partial or split liver transplant has been utilized. There was concern that regeneration of these grafts would negatively affect oncologic outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared posttransplant graft survival between hepatocellular carcinoma whole livertransplant and partial/splitlivertransplant using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (2002-2017). The 330 partial/split liver transplant recipients were compared with a logistic regressionbased propensity score 1:1 matched whole liver transplant cohort (n = 330) and a random unmatched whole livertransplant cohort(n = 4143). Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models evaluated the effects of partial/split and whole liver transplant on survival.

RESULTS

Unadjusted analysis demonstrated no difference in graft survivalbetween thepartial/split and whole liver transplant cohorts (overall log-rank P = .78). After adjustments for recipient age, last laboratory Modelfor End-stage LiverDisease score, hepatitisBviral infection co-diagnosis, liver donor risk index, donor historyofdiabetes, anddonorbodymass index category were made (all P ⟨ .05), multivariable analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the risk of graftfailure in thepartial/splitlivertransplant cohort compared with either the matched or random whole livertransplant cohort (both P ≥ .23).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial/split liver transplant was not an independent risk factor for graft failure. Additional studies are needed to further elucidate differences in these populations to determine the "right" candidate for partial/split liver transplant.

Liver Transplantation for Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis: A US Population-Based Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is the most common histiocytic disorder. Liver involvement is seen in 10.1% to 19.8% of patients with LCH and can lead to secondary sclerosing cholangitis requiring liver transplantation (LT). We describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing LT for LCH. All patients undergoing a first LT for LCH in the United States were identified in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database (1987-2018). The Kaplan-Meier curve method and log-rank tests evaluated post-LT survival. A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. A total of 60 LCH LT recipients were identified in the SRTR, and 55 patients (91.7%) were children with median total bilirubin levels at LT of 5.8 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR], 2.7-12.9). A total of 49 patients (81.7%) underwent deceased donor LT (DDLT). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year patient survival rates were 86.6%, 82.4%, and 82.4%, respectively. The systematic review yielded 26 articles reporting on 50 patients. Of the patients, 41 were children (82.0%), 90.0% had multisystem LCH, and most patients underwent DDLT (91.9%; n = 34/37). Pre-LT chemotherapy was administered in 74.0% and steroids in 71.7% (n = 33/46) of the patients, and a recurrence of LCH to the liver was reported in 8.0% of the patients. Of the 50 patients, 11 (22.0%) died during a median follow-up of 25.2 months (IQR, 9.0-51.6), and the 1-year patient survival rate was 79.4%. LT can be considered as a feasible life-saving option for the management of liver failure secondary to LCH in well-selected patients.

Delay in liver transplantation referral for adolescents with biliary atresia transitioning to adult care: a slippery slope

We compared the waitlist mortality of 114 adolescent (12–17 years) and 217 adult (≥ 18 years) biliary atresia candidates, and the post-transplant survival of 117 adolescent and 160 adult biliary atresia liver transplant recipients using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (2002-2018). After adjusting for Model for End-stage Liver Disease score (P = 0.001) and ascites, portal vein thrombosis, encephalopathy, life support at listing (all P ≥ 0.09), adults demonstrated 10.9 times higher risk of waitlist mortality vs. adolescents (95 per cent c.i. 1.55 to 76.46; P = 0.02). Adolescents exhibited superior patient (P = 0.007) and graft survival (P = 0.006).

Surgical resection and survival outcomes in metastatic young adult colorectal cancer patients

Background

The incidence of colorectal cancer in adults younger than age 50 has increased with rates expected to continue to increase over the next decade. The objective of this study is to examine the survival benefit of surgical resection (primary and/or metastatic) versus palliative therapy in this patient population.

Methods

We identified 6708 young adults aged 18–45 years diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from 2004 to 2015 from the SEER database. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimation, log rank test, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Sixty‐three percent of patients in our study underwent primary tumor resection (PTR), with 40% undergoing PTR alone and 23% undergoing both resection of primary disease and metastasectomy. The median OS for patients who underwent both PTR and metastasectomy was 36 months, compared to 13 months for those who did not receive any surgical intervention. The multivariate analysis showed significant OS benefit of receiving both PTR and metastasectomy (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.31–0.37, p < 0.001) compared to palliative therapy. Undergoing PTR only and metastasectomy only were also associated with improved OS (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.43–0.49, p < 0.001 and HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55–0.76, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

This is the largest observational study to evaluate survival outcomes in young‐onset mCRC patients and the role of surgical intervention of the primary and/or metastatic site. Our study provides evidence of statistically significant increase in OS for young mCRC patients who undergo surgical intervention of the primary and/or metastatic site.

Liver transplantation for congenital hepatic fibrosis

Congenital hepatic fibrosis (CHF) is a hereditary fibrocystic disease that can progress to portal hypertension and recurrent cholangitis requiring liver transplantation (LT). It can be associated with renal pathology and need for kidney transplantation (KT). We describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing liver transplantation alone (LTA) and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) for CHF using the Unites States Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. A total of 197 patients who received LT for CHF between 2002 and 2018 were identified - 87 (44.2%) received SLKT, 110 (55.8%) received LTA. The 1-, 3- and 5-year patient survival were 99.0%, 96.2% and 94.6%. The 1-, 3- and 5-year liver graft survival were 94.9%, 91.1% and 89.6%. No significant differences in patient or liver graft survival were observed between the SLKT and LTA groups, or between paediatric and adult recipients. 53.3% of patients with CHF necessitating LT also have significant renal disease requiring KT. Kidney graft survival for isolated KT prior to LT were poorer compared with KT performed simultaneously or after LT. Both LTA and SLKT for CHF are associated with excellent long-term outcomes in paediatric and adult patients.

Surgical management of pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database

PURPOSE

This study evaluates overall survival (OS) between liver transplantation (LT) and liver resection (LR), while assessing the effect of margin status, in children with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2015) for children (<18 years) with non-metastatic HCC undergoing surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred six children with HCC treated surgically (LT 34, LR 72) were identified. For T1 stage, no difference in OS was observed for LT vs. margin-negative liver resection [LR(-)] (log-rank, p = 0.47). For T2/T3/T4 stage, no difference in OS was observed for LT vs. LR(-) (log-rank, p = 0.08); both subgroups exhibited superior OS vs. margin-positive liver resection [LR(+)] (log-rank, LT vs. LR(+): p = 0.001 and LR(-) vs. LR(+): p = 0.04). On multivariable Cox regression: (i) histology (fibrolamellar vs. not) and T stage (T1 vs. T2/T3/T4) were not associated with OS (both p = 0.06), (ii) chemotherapy and size >5 cm were not associated with OS (both p ≥ 0.42), (iii) when compared to LT, both LR(-) (p = 0.03) and LR(+) (p = 0.001) were associated with increased likelihood of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Although margin-negative resection may be obtained with LT or LR, early LT consultation is warranted for children at high risk of LR(+) regardless of Milan criteria due to the negative impact of LR(+) on OS.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: An individual patient data survival meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We compared the outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) vs. open hepatectomy (OH) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).

METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using PRISMA guidelines (end-of-search date: 08-June-2020). Individual patient data on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses, and one- and two-stage survival analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Eight retrospective cohort studies comparing LH (n = 544) vs. OH (n = 2256) were identified. LH demonstrated lower overall complication (Risk ratio [RR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-0.90; p = 0.01), surgical lymphadenectomy (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58-0.93; p = 0.01) and margin-positive resection (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; p = 0.04) rates, and higher recurrence-free rate (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.51; p = 0.04) vs. OH. In Cox regression, no difference was observed regarding OS (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.65-1.91; p = 0.70) and RFS (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.74-1.90; p = 0.47).

CONCLUSION

The use of LH should be considered when feasible in well-selected iCCA patients by hepatobiliary surgeons with experience in minimally-invasive surgery.

Effect of Donor Transaminase Levels on Graft Survival Following Liver Transplant: An Analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Database

OBJECTIVES

Despite data showing equivalent outcomes between grafts from marginal versus standard criteria deceased liver donors, elevated donor transaminases constitute a frequent reason to decline potential livers. We assessed the effect of donor transaminase levels and other characteristics on graft survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of adult first deceased donor liver transplant recipients with available transaminase levels registered in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database (2008-2018). We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the effects of donor characteristics on graft survival.

RESULTS

Of 53 913 liver transplants, 52 158 were allografts from donors with low transaminases (≤ 500 U/L; group A) and 1755 were from donors with elevated transaminases (> 500 U/L; group B). Group A recipients were more likely to be hospitalized (P = .01) or in intensive care (P < .001) or to have mechanical assistance (P < .001), portal vein thrombosis (P = .01), diabetes mellitus (P = .003), or dialysis the week before liver transplant (P = .004). Multivariable analysis (controlling for recipient characteristics) showed donor risk factors of graft failure included diabetes mellitus (P < .001), donation after cardiac death (P < .001), total bilirubin > 3.5 mg/dL (P < .001), serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL (P = .01), and cold ischemia time > 6 hours (P < .001). Regional organ sharing showed lower risk of graft failure (P = .02). Donor transaminases > 500 U/L were not associated with graft failure (relative risk, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.91-1.14; P = .74).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor transaminases > 500 U/L should not preclude the use of liver grafts. Instead, donor total bilirubin > 3.5 mg/dL and serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL appear to be associated with higher likelihood of graft failure after liver transplant.

Management of hepatoblastoma in the United States: Can we do better?

BACKGROUND

Hepatoblastoma is the most common type of liver cancer in children. Refined therapeutic approaches combining risk-adapted chemotherapy along with complete tumor resection has led to improved survival. We aimed to evaluate the current state of management and outcomes for hepatoblastoma in the United States.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 794 children (<18 years) with hepatoblastoma from the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). We assessed overall survival by means of Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Median age was 1 year (interquartile range: 0-2) and 170 (21.4%) presented with metastatic disease. Surgical resection was included in the treatment of 614 (77.3%) children (resection in 66.8% and liver transplantation in 10.6%). In the entire cohort, 95.1% of children received chemotherapy. In the surgical cohort, 575 (93.6%) received chemotherapy (34.5% neoadjuvant, 28.7% adjuvant, 30.5% both neoadjuvant and adjuvant). The 5-year overall survival was 76.6% for the entire cohort (no-surgery group: 55.3% vs surgery group: 82.8%). In multivariable analysis for all children, age ≥8 years (P = .009), metastasis (P < .001), surgery only (P = .009), and chemotherapy only (P < .001) were risk factors for mortality. In multivariable analysis for the surgical cohort, metastasis (P = .001), multifocality (P = .02), no chemotherapy (P = .03), and margin-positive resection (P = .02) were risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSION

Excellent long-term overall survival is achievable with a combination of chemotherapy and surgical resection when a negative resection margin is achieved. However, nearly a quarter of children never received surgical treatment, representing a potential opportunity for improvement in care.

Feasibility of Serial Ultrasound Measurements of the Rectus Femoris Muscle Area to Assess Muscle Loss in Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation in the Intensive Care Unit

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) care before liver transplantation (LT) often experience significant muscle mass loss, which has been associated with mortality. In this exploratory study, we primarily aimed to assess the feasibility of serial ultrasound (US) rectus femoris muscle area (RFMA) measurements for the evaluation of progressive muscle loss in ICU-bound potential LT candidates and describe the rate of muscle loss as assessed by sequential US RFMA measurements. Secondarily, we sought to identify patient characteristics associated with muscle loss and determine how muscle loss is associated with survival.

Comparison of Wait-List Mortality Between Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Transplant Candidates

Despite the divergent disease biology of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), wait-list prioritization is identical for both diagnoses. We compared wait-list and posttransplant outcomes between CCA and HCC liver transplantation patients with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exceptions using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data. The 408 CCA candidates listed between 2003 and mid-2017 were matched to 2 HCC cohorts by listing date (±2 months, n = 816) and by Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) region and date (±6 months, n = 408). Cumulative incidence competing risk regression examined the effects of diagnosis, OPTN region, and center-level CCA listing volume on wait-list removal due to death/being too ill (dropout). Cox models evaluated the effects of diagnosis, OPTN region, center-level CCA volume, and waiting time on graft failure among deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. After adjusting for OPTN region and CCA listing volume (all P ≥ 0.07), both HCC cohorts had a reduced likelihood of wait-list dropout compared with CCA candidates (HCC with period matching only: subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P = 0.02 and HCC with OPTN region and period matching: SHR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.87; P = 0.007). The cumulative incidence rates of wait-list dropout at 6 and 12 months were 13.2% (95% CI, 10.0%-17.0%) and 23.9% (95% CI, 20.0%-29.0%) for CCA candidates, 7.3% (95% CI, 5.0%-10.0%) and 12.7% (95% CI, 10.0%-17.0%) for HCC candidates with region and listing date matching, and 7.1% (95% CI, 5.0%-9.0%) and 12.6% (95% CI, 10.0%-15.0%) for HCC candidates with listing date matching only. Additionally, HCC DDLT recipients had a 57% reduced risk of graft failure compared with CCA recipients (P < 0.001). Waiting time was unrelated to graft failure (P = 0.57), and there was no waiting time by diagnosis cohort interaction effect (P = 0.47). When identically prioritized, LT candidates with CCA have increased wait-list dropout compared with those with HCC. More granular data are necessary to discern ways to mitigate this wait-list disadvantage and improve survival for patients with CCA.

Living vs deceased donor liver transplantation in cholestatic liver disease: An analysis of the OPTN database

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) can expand the donor pool for cholestatic liver disease (CLD) patients. We sought to compare the outcomes of deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) vs LDLT in CLD patients.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of adult CLD recipients registered in the OPTN database who received primary LT between 2002 and 2018. Cox proportional hazards regression models with mixed effects were used to determine the impact of graft type on patient and graft survival.

RESULTS

Five thousand, nine hundred ninety-nine DDLT (5730 donation after brain death [DBD], 269 DCD) and 912 LDLT recipients were identified. Ten-year patient/graft survival rates were DBD: 73.8%/67.9%, DCD: 74.7%/60.7%, and LDLT: 82.5%/73.9%. Higher rates of biliary complications as a cause of graft failure were seen in DCD (56.8%) than LDLT (30.5%) or DBD (18.7%) recipients. On multivariable analysis, graft type was not associated with patient mortality, while DCD was independently associated with graft failure (P = .046).

CONCLUSION

DBD, DCD, and LDLT were associated with comparable overall patient survival. No difference in the risk of graft failure could be observed between LDLT and DBD. DCD can be an acceptable alternative to DBD with equivalent patient survival, but inferior graft survival likely related to the high rate of biliary complications.

Population-Based Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Children: Identifying Optimal Surgical Treatment

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitutes 0.5% of childhood malignancies and exhibits poor prognosis. Complete tumor extirpation either by partial liver resection (LR) or liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative treatment. Due to the poor initial outcomes of LT, LR has remained the mainstay of treatment for all but select children fulfilling the Milan criteria (originally designed for adults).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric HCC patients (younger than 18 years of age) registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2015. Survival analysis was performed by means of Kaplan-Meier methods, 2-sided stratified log-rank tests, and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of 127 children with HCC, 46 did not undergo operation (36.2%), 32 underwent LT (25.2%), and 49 underwent LR (38.6%). Using the Kaplan-Meier method, the 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates for LT and LR were 87% and 63%, respectively. LT exhibited superior CSS vs LR (log-rank, p = 0.007). For T1 stage, LT showed equivalent CSS compared with LR (log-rank, p = 0.23), and for T2 and T3 stage, LT exhibited superior CSS (log-rank, p = 0.047 and p = 0.01, respectively). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, T3/T4 stage (adjusted hazard ratio 13.63; 95% CI, 2.9 to 64.07; p = 0.001), and LR (adjusted hazard ratio 7.51; 95% CI, 2.07 to 27.29; p = 0.002) were found to be independently associated with cancer-specific mortality. Fibrolamellar histology and lymph node status were not found to be associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that children diagnosed with nonmetastatic advanced-stage HCC have a favorable prognosis after LT compared with LR. Early inclusion of an LT consultation after the initial diagnosis is warranted, especially in children with unresectable HCC or when complete tumor extirpation with LR is not feasible.