Survival Prediction in Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Mitral Valve Operation After Previous Failed MitraClip Procedures

Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of reintervention after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

OBJECTIVE

The use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is growing substantially, and reintervention after TEER by way of repeat TEER or mitral valve surgery (MVS) is increasing as a result. In this nationally representative study we examined the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of reintervention after index TEER.

METHODS

Between July 2013 and November 2017, we reviewed 11,396 patients who underwent index TEER using Medicare beneficiary data. These patients were prospectively tracked and identified as having repeat TEER or MVS. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, 30-day composite morbidity, and cumulative survival.

RESULTS

Among 11,396 patients who underwent TEER, 548 patients (4.8%) required reintervention after a median time interval of 4.5 months. Overall 30-day mortality was 8.6%, 30-day readmission was 20.9%, and 30-day composite morbidity was 48.2%. According to reintervention type, 294 (53.7%) patients underwent repeat TEER, and 254 (46.3%) underwent MVS. Patients who underwent MVS were more likely to be younger and female, but had a similar comorbidity burden compared with the repeat TEER cohort. After adjustment, there were no differences in 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.26 [95% CI, 0.65-2.45]) or 30-day readmission (AOR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.72-1.81]). MVS was associated with higher 30-day morbidity (AOR, 4.76 [95% CI, 3.17-7.14]) compared with repeat TEER. Requirement for reintervention was an independent risk factor for long-term mortality in a Cox proportional hazard model (hazard ratio, 3.26 [95% CI, 2.53-4.20]).

CONCLUSIONS

Reintervention after index TEER is a high-risk procedure that carries a significant mortality burden. This highlights the importance of ensuring procedural success for index TEER to avoid the morbidity of reintervention altogether.

Mitral valve surgery after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: a review and word of caution

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) evolves and indications broaden to include younger and lower surgical risk patients, it is essential to understand TEER failure trends and potential impact on subsequent mitral valve surgery, especially when pertaining to feasibility of durable valve reconstruction as opposed to de-novo repair.

RECENT FINDINGS

Results of the two largest series analysing mitral valve surgery following TEER have demonstrated remarkably low repairability rates with consequent need for valve replacement. Post TEER surgery was associated with high early and late mortalities, likely as a reflection of patient baseline characteristics and acuity of surgery. Presence and correction of concomitant cardiac pathologies were a frequent finding. Centre and surgeon volumes were important factors in optimizing the likelihood of salvage repair and reducing perioperative risks.

SUMMARY

Surgical mitral valve repair in reference centres remain the gold standard and the most durable treatment for degenerative mitral disease with excellent perioperative safety outcomes. Given the high likelihood of needing high-risk mitral valve replacement when TEER fails, consideration for potentially less durable transcatheter alternatives should be taken with caution in younger or lower surgical risk patients.

Mitral valve surgery after failed MitraClip-Operation for the inoperable?

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair technique (MitraClip) is a widely used treatment for mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients assessed with high surgical risk or inoperability. Only limited experiences with this highest-risk patient population exist. Procedural failure for MitraClip or recurrent MR is a strong predictor of 1-year mortality. Open mitral valve surgery constitutes the last bailout for patients within this cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center cohort study analyzed 17 mitral valve surgery patients after failed MitraClip. We, therefore, analyzed a high-risk patient population (EuroSCORE II = 10 ± 2.0) with persistent mitral valve regurgitation, which was mainly caused by detachment or dislocation of the MitraClip.

RESULTS

Symptomatic patients with failed MitraClip need a convenient operation (mean time to mitral valve surgery = 23 ± 44 days). The patient's collective showed many complex reoperations with the need for concomitant surgery. Considering the high-risk patient population, we showed an average 30-day all-cause mortality (18%, n = 3) accompanied by typical postoperative complications related to prolonged mechanical ventilation (44 ± 48 h) and ICU stay (11 ± 11 days), reflecting high-risk patients. Further, excellent valve-related outcomes were shown regarding adverse cardiac events (valve-related mortality 6%, n = 1) and postoperative echocardiographic results (moderate or severe paravalvular leak 6%, n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Failure of MitraClip represents a challenging situation limited by high-risk profiles of patients and limits the possibility of surgical valve repair, shown by a high rate of mitral valve replacement (94%, n = 16). Secondary surgery was associated with moderate 30-day and postdischarge outcomes. Therefore, a careful evaluation of patients undergoing MitraClip is of paramount importance.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

OBJECTIVE

Up to 28% of patients may need mitral valve (MV) surgery after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). This study evaluates the outcomes of minimally invasive MV surgery after TEER. Methods: International multicenter registry of minimally invasive MV surgery after TEER between 2013 and 2020. Subgroups were stratified by the number of devices implanted (≤1 vs >1), as well as time interval from TEER to surgery (≤1 year vs >1 year). Results: A total of 56 patients across 13 centers were included with a mean age of 73 ± 11 years, and 50% were female. The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS PROM) score for MV replacement was 8% (Q1-Q3 = 5% to 11%) and the ratio of observed to expected mortality was 0.9. The etiology of mitral regurgitation (MR) prior to TEER was primary MR in 75% of patients and secondary MR in 25%. There were 30 patients (54%) who had >1 device implanted. The median time between TEER and surgery was 252 days (33 to 636 days). Hemodynamics, including MR severity, MV area, and mean gradient, significantly improved after minimally invasive surgery and sustained to 1-year follow-up. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 7.1%, and 1-year actuarial survival was 85.6% ± 6%. Conclusions: Minimally invasive MV surgery after TEER may be achieved as predicted by the STS PROM. Most patients underwent MV replacement instead of repair. As TEER is applied more widely, patients should be informed about the potential need for surgical intervention over time after TEER. These discussions will allow better informed consent and post-procedure planning.

Clinical Outcomes after Mitral Valve Surgery in Failed MitraClip Procedures

BACKGROUND

 We retrospectively evaluated in-hospital and overall outcome of patients who received mitral valve replacement (MVR) after failed MitraClip procedure.

METHODS

 A total of 26 out of 740 patients received MVR after treatment with MitraClip between June 2010 and December 2020. We analyzed in-hospital mortality and overall mortality during the median follow-up period of 72 days after MVR.

RESULTS

 The median age in the entire cohort was 77.5 years. In-hospital mortality was 15.4% (n = 4) and the overall mortality during the follow-up period was 27% (n = 7). The median time between the MitraClip procedure and surgery was 34.5 days. The main reasons for surgery were mitral stenosis (23.1%), persistent prolapse of the mitral valve leaflets (42.3%), and persistent tethering of the mitral valve leaflets (34.6%). At the time of surgery all of the patients presented with New York Heart Association 3 and above. The underlying mitral valve pathology was mainly secondary 61.5% (n = 16). Median left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 60 mm. Preoperative ejection fraction was 40% and above in 73% of the cohort. In addition to the mitral valve procedure, 57.7% of patients received either concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty, aortic valve surgery, ascending aortic replacement, or coronary artery bypass grafting.

CONCLUSION

 The need for MVR for failed MitraClip repair is low and the results are acceptable. However, remaining options for reconstruction are usually limited and MVR is often needed. Anticipating success or failure according to the underlying pathology more than according to concomitant risk factors should form the basis in decision making for the treatment modality of first choice.

Mitral Valve Surgery After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Mid-Term Outcomes From the CUTTING-EDGE International Registry

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine clinical and echocardiographic characteristics, mechanisms of failure, and outcomes of mitral valve (MV) surgery after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

BACKGROUND

Although >100,000 mitral TEER procedures have been performed worldwide, longitudinal data on MV surgery after TEER are lacking.

METHODS

Data from the multicenter, international CUTTING-EDGE registry were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated. Median follow-up duration was 9.0 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.2-25.7 months) after MV surgery, and follow-up was 96.1% complete at 30 days and 81.1% complete at 1 year.

RESULTS

From July 2009 to July 2020, 332 patients across 34 centers underwent MV surgery after TEER. The mean age was 73.8 ± 10.1 years, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk for MV repair at initial TEER was 4.0 (IQR: 2.3-7.3), and primary/mixed and secondary mitral regurgitation were present in 59.0% and 38.5%, respectively. The median interval from TEER to surgery was 3.5 months (IQR: 0.5-11.9 months), with overall median Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk of 4.8% for MV replacement (IQR: 2.8%-8.4%). The primary indication for surgery was recurrent mitral regurgitation (33.5%), and MV replacement and concomitant tricuspid surgery were performed in 92.5% and 42.2% of patients, respectively. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 16.6% and 31.3%, respectively. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the actuarial estimates of mortality were 24.1% at 1 year and 31.7% at 3 years after MV surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first report of the CUTTING-EDGE registry, the mortality and morbidity risks of MV surgery after TEER were not negligible, and only <10% of patients underwent MV repair. These registry data provide valuable insights for further research to improve these outcomes.

Mitral valve surgery after a failed MitraClip procedure

OBJECTIVES

Among patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip device, a relevant proportion (2-6%) requires open mitral valve surgery within 1 year after unsuccessful clip implantation. The goal of this review is to pool data from different reports to provide a comprehensive overview of mitral valve surgery outcomes after the MitraClip procedure and estimate in-hospital and follow-up mortality.

METHODS

All published clinical studies reporting on surgical intervention for a failed MitraClip procedure were evaluated for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The primary study outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital adverse events and follow-up mortality. Pooled estimate rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of study outcomes were calculated using a DerSimionian-Laird binary random-effects model. To assess heterogeneity across studies, we used the Cochrane Q statistic to compute I2 values.

RESULTS

Overall, 20 reports were included, comprising 172 patients. Mean age was 70.5 years (95% CI 67.2-73.7 years). The underlying mitral valve disease was functional mitral regurgitation in 50% and degenerative mitral regurgitation in 49% of cases. The indication for surgery was persistent or recurrent mitral regurgitation (grade >2) in 93% of patients, whereas 6% of patients presented with mitral stenosis. At the time of the operation, 80% of patients presented in New York Heart Association functional class III-IV. Despite favourable intraoperative results, in-hospital mortality was 15%. The rate of periprocedural cerebrovascular accidents was 6%. At a mean follow-up of 12 months, all-cause death was 26.5%. Mitral valve replacement was most commonly required because the possibility of valve repair was jeopardized, likely due to severe valve injury after clip implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention after failed transcatheter mitral valve intervention is burdened by high in-hospital and 1-year mortality, which reflects reflecting the high-risk baseline profile of the patients. Mitral valve replacement is usually required due to leaflet injury.

Clinical impact of intervention strategies after failed transcatheter mitral valve repair

AIMS

Failure of transcatheter mitral valve repair (fTMVR) therapy has a decisive prognostic influence, and complex retreatment is of higher risk. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the survival outcome following percutaneous procedures and surgery after unsuccessful TMVR interventions for different aetiologies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 824 consecutive patients who had been treated with the MitraClip device at our institution, between September 2009 and May 2019, 63 (7.6%) symptomatic patients with therapy failure and persistent or recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) underwent reinterventions. An outcome analysis for primary (PMR) and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) and subsequent percutaneous versus surgical treatment was carried out. MitraClip reinterventions were performed in 36 patients (57.1%; n=26 SMR, n=10 PMR), while 27 (42.9%; n=13 SMR, n=14 PMR) underwent open heart surgery. Surgical patients with PMR showed lower mortality than patients with SMR (p<0.0001) and ReClip patients with PMR (p=0.073). Atrial fibrillation (HR 2.915, 95% CI: [1.311, 6.480]), prior open heart surgery (2.820 [1.215, 6.544]) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2.506 [1.099, 5.714]) increased the risk of death. The level of post-interventional MR had no relevant impact on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that, after SMR and failed TMVR, reclipping is an appropriate treatment option for symptomatic patients. For PMR patients, surgery must be favoured over a reclipping procedure. However, patients with atrial fibrillation, prior open heart surgery and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are at risk of reduced survival after reinterventions.

Outcome of medical therapy, repeat intervention, and mitral valve surgery after failed MitraClip therapy

OBJECTIVES

Optimal treatment for residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after MitraClip failure is not clearly defined. We report our clinical experience and discuss treatment options.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and January 2018, 37 patients (75 ± 8.9 years, 46% male) were admitted for symptomatic MR (grade 3.1 ± 0.47) diagnosed after previous MitraClip therapy. Clinical outcome of these patients, who underwent medical therapy alone (n = 8, M-group), repeat MitraClip therapy (n = 8, reMC group), or mitral valve surgery (n = 21, S-group) for residual MR, were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-day survival was 88% (M-group), 100% (reMC-group), and 76% (S-group). The rate of discharge to home was 88% in the reMC-group, better than 38% in the M-group (p = 0.051) and 19% in the S-group (p < 0.001). Perioperative non-survivors in the S-group had high surgical risk with median logistic EuroSCORE of 64.6% (interquartile range 57.4%-87.0%); all died from low cardiac output syndrome or multiple organ failure. The main MR pathologies resulted from leaflet tear and tethering in the M-group, tethering in the reMC-group, and degenerative valve and leaflet tear in the S-group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival at 1 year showed better outcome for patients in the reMC-group (50%, 95% CI 15.2-77.5%) and S-group (47.6%, 95% CI 25.7-66.7%), as compared to those in the M-group (12.5%, 95% CI 0.70-42.3%) (log-rank test p = 0.108 and p = 0.167, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Medical therapy alone after failed MitraClip therapy resulted in poor 1-year prognosis. In patients without extremely high surgical risk, repeat MitraClip therapy, or surgical revision MIGHT BE CONSIDERED depending on valve pathology and cardiac comorbidities.

Electrosurgical Detachment of MitraClips From the Anterior Mitral Leaflet Prior to Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that transcatheter electrosurgery might allow intentional detachment of previously placed MitraClip(s) from the anterior leaflet to recreate a single mitral orifice for transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI), leaving the retained MitraClip(s) securely fastened to the posterior leaflet and without interfering with the mitral bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis despite edge-to-edge mitral repair with the MitraClip typically have few therapeutic options because the resultant double orifice precludes TMVI. Transcatheter electrosurgery may allow detachment of failed MitraClip(s) from the anterior leaflet to recreate a single orifice for TMVI.

METHODS

This was a single-center, 5-patient, consecutive, retrospective observational cohort. Patients underwent transcatheter electrosurgical laceration and stabilization of failed MitraClip(s) to recreate a single orifice, leaving the MitraClip(s) securely fastened to the posterior leaflet. Subsequently, patients underwent TMVI with an investigational device, the Tendyne mitral bioprosthesis, on a compassionate basis. Patients were followed up to 30 days.

RESULTS

MitraClip detachment from the anterior leaflet and Tendyne implantation were successful in all patients. All patients survived to discharge. All patients were discharged with grade 0 central mitral regurgitation. Two patients had moderate perivalvular mitral regurgitation that did not require reintervention. During the follow-up period of 30 days, there were no deaths, cases of valve dysfunction, or reintervention. There was no evidence of erosion or bioprosthetic valve dysfunction attributable to the retained MitraClip(s) still attached to the posterior leaflet.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter electrosurgical detachment of failed MitraClips from the anterior leaflet followed by TMVI is technically feasible and safe at 30 days. Longer term study is needed to determine the clinical benefit of this approach and new algorithms for TMVI sizing following electrosurgical laceration and stabilization of a failed MitraClip to avoid perivalvular leak.

Percutaneous Repair of Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) affects more than 2 million people in the United States annually and is the second leading cause of heart valve disease after aortic stenosis. Surgical intervention is the currently accepted treatment of choice in patients with either symptomatic degenerative MR or asymptomatic MR with pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, or left ventricular dysfunction. Based on robust evidence from clinical trials, the MitraClip Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair system (Abbott Vascular) was approved in the United States for commercial use in 2013. To date, more than 4,000 patients have been treated with the MitraClip in the United States and more than 35,000 patients worldwide. The device is approved in the United States for symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation in patients who are at high risk for surgery, as registry data has shown the device to be safe and effective in high-risk patients. In fact, when evaluated in the real-world setting in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry, the device appears to be more safe and effective than in the original clinical trials. This review summarizes the clinical trials and registry data, reviews ongoing trials evaluating the device's utility in expanding populations, and introduces novel mitral valve repair devices in various stages of development.

Repeat MitraClip for early recurrent mitral regurgitation

Treatment for recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) after MitraClip therapy remains a challenging issue. This study reports the efficacy of repeat MitraClip therapy for recurrent MR during the early phase after the index MitraClip procedure. We present a case series of four consecutive patients who underwent repeat MitraClip procedures for severe recurrent MR during the early phase. Partial clip detachment (PCD) was the suspected cause of recurrent MR in these cases. All patients received additional clip(s). PCD could be stabilized and MR grade improved in all cases compared with that before the second procedure. Repeat MitraClip procedures for recurrent MR due to PCD are feasible during the early phase. However, patients having PCD with paracommissural MR may not be good candidates for repeat MitraClip.

Strategies and Outcomes of Repeat Mitral Valve Interventions after Failed MitraClip Therapy

Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) with the MitraClip system (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) is a valid therapeutic option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) deemed to be at high or prohibitive surgical risk. Despite the reassuring data on efficacy and long-term durability of the procedure, the proportion of patients with residual or relapsing severe MR after MitraClip therapy is not negligible. In light of the detrimental prognostic impact of severe MR, repeat interventions are increasingly performed in clinical practice using different techniques. In high-risk settings, percutaneous procedures have proven to be effective and safe at reducing MR. Building on this, we sought to summarize the current landscape and clinical experience of reinterventions after failed MitraClip therapy, so as to assist physicians facing the clinical hurdle of proper treatment management after failed PMVR.