Systematic Compared With Targeted Staging With Endobronchial Ultrasound in Patients With Lung Cancer

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groups in the Forthcoming (Ninth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The TNM classification of lung cancer is periodically revised. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer collected and analyzed a new database to inform the forthcoming ninth edition of the TNM classification. The results are herewith presented.

METHODS

After exclusions, 76,518 patients from a total of 124,581 registered patients were available for analyses: 58,193 with clinical stage, 39,192 with pathologic stage, and 62,611 with best stage NSCLC. The proposed new N2 subcategories (N2a, involvement of single ipsilateral mediastinal or subcarinal nodal station, and N2b, involvement of multiple ipsilateral mediastinal nodal stations with or without involvement of the subcarinal nodal station) and the new M1c subcategories (M1c1, multiple extrathoracic metastases in one organ system, and M1c2, multiple extrathoracic metastases in multiple organ systems) were considered in the survival analyses. Several potential stage groupings were evaluated, using multiple analyses, including recursive partitioning, assessment of homogeneity within and discrimination between potential groups, clinical and statistical significance of survival differences, multivariable regression, and broad assessment of generalizability.

RESULTS

T1N1, T1N2a, and T3N2a subgroups are assigned to IIA, IIB, and IIIA stage groups, respectively. T2aN2b and T2bN2b subgroups are assigned to IIIB. M1c1 and M1c2 remain in stage group IVB. Analyses reveal consistent ordering, discrimination of prognosis, and broad generalizability of the proposed ninth edition stage classification of lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed stages for the ninth edition TNM improve the granularity of nomenclature about anatomic extent that has benefits as treatment approaches become increasingly differentiated and complex.

EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal staging of centrally located T1N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer clinically staged with PET/CT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical usefulness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for mediastinal staging of centrally located T1N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinically staged with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

METHODS

We conducted a study that included patients with centrally located T1N0M0 NSCLC, clinically staged with PET/CT who underwent EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal staging. Patients with negative EBUS-TBNA underwent mediastinoscopy, video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) and/or lung resection with systematic nodal dissection, that were considered the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), overall accuracy of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing mediastinal metastases (N2 disease) and the number needed to treat (NNT: number of patients needed to undergo EBUS-TBNA to avoid a case of pathologic N2 disease after resection) were calculated.

RESULTS

One-hundred eighteen patients were included. EBUS-TBNA proved N2 disease in four patients. In the remaining 114 patients who underwent mediastinoscopy, VAMLA and/or resection there were two cases of N2 (N2 prevalence 5.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV and overall accuracy for diagnosing mediastinal metastases (N2 disease) were of 66%, 100%, 98%, 100% and 98%, respectively. The NNT was 31 (95% CI: 15-119).

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBNA in patients with central clinically staged T1N0M0 NSCLC presents a good diagnostic accuracy for mediastinal staging, even in a population with low prevalence of N2 disease. Therefore, its indication should be considered in the management of even these early lung cancers.

What is new in mediastinal staging?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Appropriate staging is of utmost importance in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as the pathologic stage dictates both overall prognosis and appropriate therapeutic pathways. This article seeks to review the current recommendations for mediastinal staging of NSCLC and available modalities to achieve this. Landmark publications pertaining to recent advancements in NSCLC treatments are also highlighted and the role of specific bronchoscopic modalities for tissue acquisition are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advancements in the treatment of NSCLC have made accurate mediastinal staging more important than ever. Guidelines and recommendations outlining patients that warrant invasive mediastinal staging are available and a systematic approach should be utilized when sampling is performed. Ensuring the adequacy of tissue for the growing number of molecular biomarkers that must be tested has been the focus of many recent studies.

SUMMARY

Appropriate mediastinal staging is crucial for the management of patients with NSCLC as is obtaining adequate tissue for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. EBUS-TBNA is sufficient for the diagnosis of nonsmall cell and small cell lung carcinomas, but EBUS-guided intranodal forceps and cryobiopsy may provide more optimal specimen for patients with benign disease, such as sarcoidosis, or in cases of lymphoma. Further studies are necessary to better delineate the role of these techniques in the diagnosis and staging of mediastinal diseases before they become the primary diagnostic modalities.

Proposed quality indicators and recommended standard reporting items in performance of EBUS bronchoscopy: An official World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology Expert Panel consensus statement

BACKGROUND

Since their introduction, both linear and radial endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) have become an integral component of the practice of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology. The quality of health care can be measured by comparing the performance of an individual or a health service with an ideal threshold or benchmark. The taskforce sought to evaluate quality indicators in EBUS bronchoscopy based on clinical relevance/importance and on the basis that observed significant variation in outcomes indicates potential for improvement in health care outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review informed the composition of a comprehensive list of candidate quality indicators in EBUS. A multiple-round modified Delphi consensus process was subsequently performed with the aim of reaching consensus over a final list of quality indicators and performance targets for these indicators. Standard reporting items were developed, with a strong preference for items where evidence demonstrates a relationship with quality indicator outcomes.

RESULTS

Twelve quality Indicators are proposed, with performance targets supported by evidence from the literature. Standardized reporting items for both radial and linear EBUS are recommended, with evidence supporting their utility in assessing procedural outcomes presented.

CONCLUSION

This statement is intended to provide a framework for individual proceduralists to assess the quality of EBUS they provide their patients through the identification of clinically relevant, feasible quality measures. Emphasis is placed on outcome measures, with a preference for consistent terminology to allow communication and benchmarking between centres.

Systematic endoscopic staging of mediastinum to determine impact on radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer (SEISMIC): protocol for a prospective single arm multicentre interventional study

Background

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is established as the preferred method of mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selective (targeted) LN sampling is most commonly performed however studies in early stage NSCLC and locally advanced NSCLC confirm systematic EBUS-TBNA evaluation improves accuracy of mediastinal staging. This study aims to establish the rate of detection of positron emission tomography (PET)-occult LN metastases following systematic LN staging by EBUS-TBNA, and to determine the utility of systematic mediastinal staging for accurate delineation of radiation treatment fields in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis/staging of locally advanced NSCLC will be enrolled in this international multi-centre single arm study. Systematic mediastinal LN evaluation will be performed, with all LN exceeding 6 mm to be sampled by TBNA. Where feasible, endoscopic ultrasound staging (EUS-B) may also be performed. Results of minimally invasive staging will be compared to FDG-PET. The primary end-point is proportion of patients in whom systematic LN staging identified PET-occult NSCLC metastases. Secondary outcome measures include (i) rate of nodal upstaging, (ii) false positive rate of PET for mediastinal LN assessment, (iii) analysis of clinicoradiologic risk factors for presence of PET-occult LN metastases, (iv) impact of systematic LN staging in patients with discrepant findings on PET and EBUS-TBNA on target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OAR) in patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Discussion

With specificity of PET of 90%, guidelines recommend tissue confirmation of positive mediastinal LN to ensure potentially early stage patients are not erroneously denied potentially curative resection. However, while confirmation of pathologic LN is routinely sought, the exact extent of mediastinal LN involvement in NSCLC in patient with Stage III NSCLC is rarely established. Studies examining systematic LN staging in early stage NSCLC report a significant discordance between PET and EBUS-TBNA. In patients with locally advanced disease this has significant implications for radiation field planning, with risk of geographic miss in the event of PET-occult mediastinal LN metastases. The SEISMIC study will examine both diagnostic outcomes following systematic LN staging with EBUS-TBNA, and impact on radiation treatment planning.

Trial registration

ACTRN12617000333314, ANZCTR, Registered on 3 March 2017.

The Value of a Systematic Protocol Using Endobronchial Ultrasound and Endoscopic Ultrasound in Staging of Lung Cancer for Patients with Imaging iN0–N1 Disease

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> We hypothesize that systematic, combined, and multidisciplinary study of the mediastinum (endobronchial ultrasound [EBUS] and endoscopic ultrasound [EUS]) in patients with NSCLC with radiologically normal mediastinum improves the results of mediastinal staging obtained with EBUS alone. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective study of the prospective database collected on the patients with NSCLC with a radiologically normal mediastinum and an indication for systematic staging with EBUS and EUS. EBUS staging was followed by EUS in patients in which the results from the pathological analysis of EBUS were negative. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-five patients were included in the analysis. The combination of EBUS followed by EUS provided better results than EBUS alone: sensitivity (S) 95% versus 80%, negative predictive value (NPV) 96.15% versus 86.21%, negative likelihood ratio 0.05 versus 0.20, and post-test probability 3.8% versus 13.8%. This represents an increase in S (15%), the validity index (6.6%), and NPV (9.9%) compared to EBUS alone. There were 4 false negatives (FNs) (8.8%) with the EBUS test alone. After adding EUS, 3 more cases were positive (6.6%) and only 1 FN (2.2%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In patients with NSCLC and a radiographically normal mediastinum, a systematic and combined staging with EBUS and EUS show higher sensitivity in the detection of mediastinal metastasis than with the use of EBUS alone. The high accuracy of the test means that the use of mediastinoscopy is not necessary to confirm the results in these patients. Since the availability of EUS is low, it may be advisable for the interventional pulmonologist to receive training in EUS-b.

Using structured progress to measure competence in flexible bronchoscopy

Background

Flexible bronchoscopy is a core invasive procedure in pulmonary medicine and training in the procedure is mandatory. Diagnostic completeness and procedure time have been identified as useful measures of competence. No outcome measures have been developed regarding navigational path in bronchoscopy to assess whether the bronchial segments have been identified in an arbitrary or structured order. We investigated whether a new outcome measure for structured progression could be used to assess competency in flexible bronchoscopy.

Methods

The study was designed as a prospective comparative study. Twelve novices, eleven intermediates, and ten expert bronchoscopy operators completed three full bronchoscopies in a simulated setting on a phantom. The following outcome measures were collected through a checklist evaluation by a trained rater: Diagnostic Completeness as amount of visualized bronchial segments, Structured Progress between the bronchial segments in ascending order, and average intersegmental time (AIT).

Results

The ability to follow a structured ascending path through the bronchial tree correlated with a higher amount of identified bronchial segments (Pearson’s correlation, r=0.62, P<0.001) and a lower AIT (Pearson’s correlation, r=−0.52, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Operators should advance through the bronchial tree in a structured ascending order to ensure systematic progress with the highest level of diagnostic yield and the lowest procedure time. Structured progression is a useful measure to evaluate competency in flexible bronchoscopy.

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic mediastinal staging

Lung cancer is the first cause of cancer-related mortality. Mediastinal staging has a main role in the definition of the therapeutic strategy in early-stage and locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Non-invasive mediastinal staging with CT or PET imaging has relatively limited accuracy, and nodal biopsy may be required to reach adequate staging results. In the last two decades endoscopic techniques have been increasingly used in the field of mediastinal staging thanks to a reduced invasiveness and to the possibility of obtaining a more thorough assessment in comparison with surgical techniques. However, the ideal staging strategy is still a matter for debate, particularly considering the cost-effectiveness of the different approaches. Complication-rate, costs, impact on quality of life, time delay to treatment and survival of the different staging techniques still have to be analyzed in detail. Other issues to be discussed are the optimal combination of staging approaches and the influence of factors as the prevalence of nodal disease on the cost-effectiveness of the different methods. Future issues of invasive staging concern the possibility of extending the definition of nodal status to N1 intrapulmonary nodes, in the light of the development of new oncological and surgical therapeutic approaches.

Preoperative staging of the mediastinum is an essential and multidisciplinary task

Mediastinal staging is a crucial step in the management of patients with NSCLC. With the recent development of novel techniques, mediastinal staging has evolved from an activity of interest mainly for thoracic surgeons to a joint effort carried out by many specialists. In this regard, the debate of cases in MDT sessions is crucial for optimal management of patients. Current evidence-based clinical guidelines for preoperative NSCLC staging recommend that mediastinal staging should be performed with increasing invasiveness. Image-based techniques are the first approach, although they have limited accuracy and findings must be confirmed by pathology in almost all cases. In this setting, the advent of radiomics is promising. Invasive staging depends on procedural factors rather than diagnostic performance. The choice between endoscopy-based or surgical procedures should depend on the local expertise of each centre. As the extension of mediastinal disease in terms of number of involved lymph nodes and nodal stations affects prognosis and the choice of treatment, systematic samplings are preferred over random targeted samplings. Following this approach, a diagnosis of single mediastinal nodal involvement can be unreliable if all reachable mediastinal nodal stations have not been assessed. The performance of confirmatory mediastinoscopy after a negative endoscopy-based procedure is controversial but currently recommended. Current indications of invasive staging in patients with radiologically normal mediastinum have to be re-evaluated, especially for central tumour location.

Invasive Staging Procedures Do Not Prevent Nodal Metastases From Being Missed in Stage I Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Up to 20% of clinical stage I lung cancer patients harbor lymph node metastases that go undetected (missed) during the clinical staging evaluation. We investigated to what degree the addition of invasive nodal staging procedures to imaging, as currently practiced, prevents radiographically occult nodal metastases from being missed during the clinical staging evaluation.

METHODS

Treatment-naive patients, imaged by positron emission tomography and computed tomography, who underwent lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer from 2012 to 2017 in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database were studied. Rates of missed nodal metastases (MNM) (ie, nodal metastases in lobectomy specimens undetected during clinical staging evaluation) were determined. Risk factors were assessed with multivariable modeling.

RESULTS

Of the 30,685 clinical stage I patients identified, 3895 (12.7%) underwent preoperative endobronchial ultrasound and 3341 (10.9%) underwent mediastinoscopy. Invasive staging was more common with tumors > 2 cm (66.4% vs 50.2%, P < .001) and squamous histology (26.9% vs 16.9%, P < .001). MNM were discovered in 14.7% of patients, including 20.1% of patients (95% confidence interval, 18.8%-21.5%) who had undergone endobronchial ultrasound and 18.2% (95% confidence interval, 16.7%-19.6%) who had undergone mediastinoscopy. Hilar nodes were most often "missed" (9.5%). Using cut-points in tumor size, histology, laterality, and age, patients could be stratified into particularly high-risk (25% MNM) and low-risk (6% MNM) cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial risk of occult lymph node metastases persists in patients with clinical stage I lung cancer despite negative invasive nodal staging, positron emission tomography, and computed tomography. In the absence of a thorough surgical nodal evaluation, early-stage lung cancer patients are at risk of under-treatment.

Is it necessary to sample the contralateral nodal stations by EBUS-TBNA in patients with lung cancer and clinical N0 / N1 on PET-CT?

OBJECTIVES

Systematic mediastinal staging (sampling all visible nodes measuring ≥ 5 mm from N3 station to N1, regardless of PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) by endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a decisive step in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analyzed the prevalence of N3 disease and the utility of systematic staging in the subgroup of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA staging without showing mediastinal lesions on the PET/CT (N0/N1).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database that included 174 patients with a final diagnosis of NSCLC, with N0/N1 disease on PET/CT who underwent a systematic EBUS-TBNA staging.

RESULTS

174 consecutive patients were included. Systematic EBUS-TBNA detected N2 mediastinal involvement in 21 (12 %) cases, and no cases of N3 disease were detected (neither hilar nor mediastinal). Of the remaining 153 patients N0/N1 EBUS-TBNA, 122 underwent lung resection that revealed 4 cases of N2 disease while 117 were confirmed to be N0/N1. Thirty-three patients with N0/1 disease after EBUS-TBNA did not undergo surgery and were excluded for the NPV calculation. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV) and overall accuracy of systematic EBUS was 84 %, 100 %, 96.7 %, 100 % and 97 % respectively.

CONCLUSION

Systematic EBUS-TBNA is a very accurate method for lymph node staging in patients with NSCLC without mediastinal involvement on PET/CT. Pending more studies, the absence of contralateral hilar nodal involvement in our series, questions the need for a contralateral hilar sampling in this subgroup of patients.

Systematic endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration improves radiotherapy planning in non-small cell lung cancer

Objectives

Patients suitable for radical chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer routinely have radiotherapy (planning) volumes based on positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) can identify PET-occult malignancy and benign PET-avid regions. We investigated the impact of EBUS-TBNA on curative-intent radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A prospective multicentre trial was undertaken, investigating the impact of systematic EBUS-TBNA in addition to PET-CT for patients considered for radical chemoradiotherapy with NSCLC. A subset analysis of patients with discordant findings between PET-CT and EBUS-TBNA was performed. Radiotherapy plans investigated tumour coverage and dose to critical organs at risk (OARs) using PET-CT alone in comparison to PET-CT and EBUS-TBNA.

Results

Of 30 patients enrolled, 10 had discordant findings between PET-CT and EBUS-TBNA. EBUS-TBNA-derived plans allowed for reduction in dose to OARs in patients downstaged by EBUS-TBNA, and reduced the risk of geographic miss in treating PET-occult disease in four patients where EBUS-TBNA identified malignant involvement of PET-negative lymphadenopathy. With the addition of EBUS-TBNA to radiotherapy planning, reductions were noted of 5.7%, 3.7% and 12.5% for the risks of symptomatic pneumonitis, mean heart dose and mean oesophageal dose, respectively.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates for the first time that systematic EBUS-TBNA prior to radical-intent radiotherapy significantly improves coverage of subclinical disease through detection of PET-occult metastases. Identification of false-positive lymph node involvement in highly selected cases may reduce radiation dose to critical structures, and risk of organ toxicity.

Systematic EBUS-TBNA can identify areas of PET-occult malignancy, improving tumour coverage with radiation, and identify benign nodal regions that are PET positive, which may lead to reduced dose to critical structures such as heart, lung and spinal cordhttp://bit.ly/2QP42et

Systematic and combined endosonographic staging of lung cancer (SCORE study)

Guidelines recommend endosonography for mediastinal nodal staging in patients with resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesise that a systematic endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) evaluation combined with an oesophageal investigation using the same EBUS bronchoscope (EUS-B) improves mediastinal nodal staging versus the current practice of targeted positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT)-guided EBUS staging alone.A prospective, multicentre, international study (NCT02014324) was conducted in consecutive patients with (suspected) resectable NSCLC. After PET-CT, patients underwent systematic EBUS and EUS-B. Node(s) suspicious on CT, PET, EBUS and/or EUS-B imaging and station 4R, 4L and 7 (short axis ≥8 mm) were sampled. For patients without N2/N3 disease determined on endosonography, surgical-pathological staging was the reference standard.229 patients were included in this study. The prevalence of N2/N3 disease was 103 out of 229 patients (45%). A PET-CT-guided targeted approach by EBUS identified 75 patients with N2/N3 disease (sensitivity 73%, 95% CI 63-81%; negative predictive value (NPV) 81%, 95% CI 74-87%). Four additional patients with N2/N3 disease were found by systematic EBUS (sensitivity 77%, 95% CI 67-84%; NPV 84%, 95% CI 76-89%) and five more by EUS-B (84 patients total; sensitivity 82%, 95% CI 72-88%; NPV 87%, 95% CI 80-91%). Additional clinical relevant staging information was obtained in 23 out of 229 patients (10%).Systematic EBUS followed by EUS-B increased sensitivity for the detection of N2/N3 disease by 9% compared to PET-CT-targeted EBUS alone.