Outcomes of Lung Transplantation from HCV Viremic Donors

Promising Long-Term Outcomes of Lung Transplantation With Hepatitis C Positive Donors: Insights From the UNOS Registry

BACKGROUND

The development of effective direct-acting antiviral treatment (DAAT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has opened the possibility of using HCV+ donors. We aimed to assess the long-term feasibility of lung transplantation using organs from HCV+ donors.

METHODS

We used the UNOS database to evaluate adult lung transplant recipients between 2000 and 2023. HCV+ organs were further divided into those positive for both antibody and nucleic acid testing (NAT) or antibody testing alone. Baseline recipient and donor characteristics were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival. We performed risk analyses using multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

41,797 lung transplants were performed, among which 945 used HCV+ donors. Recipients of HCV+ lungs had higher FEV1 (P < .001), older (P < .001), and had higher BMI (P < .001). While 5-year survival did not differ between recipients of HCV+ and HCV- donor lungs (P = .093), graft survival was superior among recipients of HCV+ lungs (P = .038). Acute rejection rates were also lower for recipients of HCV+ lungs (P = .018). However, recipients of HCV+ lungs required significantly higher time on the ventilator post-transplant (P = .033). Donor HCV+ status, regardless of whether they were NAT- (HR 1.03, P = .766) or NAT+ (HR 0.89, P = .24), was not associated with adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplantation with HCV+ donor lungs demonstrates promising outcomes up to 5 years post-transplant. With careful preoperative screening, DAAT treatments, and postoperative management, recipients of HCV+ lungs may expect minimal additional complications.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2022 Part I: Lung Transplantation

These highlights focus on the research in lung transplantation (LTX) that was published in 2022 and includes the assessment and optimization of candidates for LTX, donor optimization, the use of organs from donation after circulatory death, and outcomes when using marginal or novel donors; recipient factors affecting LTX, including age, disease, the use of extracorporeal life support; and special situations, such as coronavirus disease2019, pediatric LTX, and retransplantation. The remainder of the article focuses on the perioperative management of LTX, including the perioperative risk factors for acute renal failure (acute kidney injury); the incidence and management of phrenic nerve injury, delirium, and pain; and the postoperative management of hyperammonemia, early postoperative infections, and the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA to detect rejection.

How do we expand the lung donor pool?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung transplantation activity continues to be limited by the availability of timely quality donor lungs. It is apparent though that progress has been made. The steady evolution of clinical practice, combined with painstaking scientific discovery and innovation are described.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been successful studies reporting innovations in the wider use and broader consideration of donation after circulatory death donor lungs, including an increasing number of transplants from each of the controlled, uncontrolled and medically assisted dying donor descriptive categories. Donors beyond age 70 years are providing better than expected long-term outcomes. Hepatitis C PCR positive donor lungs can be safely used if treated postoperatively with appropriate antivirals. Donor lung perfusion at a constant 10 degrees appears capable of significantly improving donor logistics and ex-vivo lung perfusion offers the potential of an ever-increasing number of novel donor management roles. Bioartificial and xenografts remain distant possibilities only at present.

SUMMARY

Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust and combined with clinical, scientific and engineering innovations, the realizable lung donor pool is proving to be larger than previously thought.

Characteristics and outcomes of lung transplants performed with ex-situ lung perfusion

BACKGROUND

Ex-situ lung perfusion (ESLP) can be used to assess and rehabilitate donor lungs, potentially expanding the donor pool. We examined the characteristics and outcomes of lung transplants performed with ESLP in the United States.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing registry of primary adult lung transplant recipients from February 28, 2018, to June 30, 2021, was performed, comparing baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and 1-year survival of ESLP vs no ESLP lung transplants.

RESULTS

Of 8204 lung transplants, 426 (5.2%) were performed with ESLP. ESLP donors were older, more donation after circulatory death (DCD), and had lower PaO2:FiO2 (P:F) ratios. Recipients had lower lung allocation scores. ESLP lungs traveled further, had longer preservation times, and were more likely double lung transplants. Reintubation rates, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, and hospital length of stay were greater in the ESLP group. On multivariable analysis, ESLP was not an independent predictor of 1-year survival. However, further analysis showed that DCD lungs managed on ESLP had worse 1-year survival compared to DCD lungs preserved with standard cold storage or with donation after brain death donor lungs.

CONCLUSIONS

ESLP is used in a small percentage of lung transplants in the US and is not independently associated with 1-year survival. ESLP combined with DCD lungs, however, is associated with worse 1-year survival and warrants further investigation.

Lung Transplantation from hepatitis C+ donor lungs: Reassuring midterm outcomes

BACKGROUND

The development of modern antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has allowed for the transplantation of HCV nucleic acid amplification testing-positive (NAT+) donor lungs with acceptable short-term outcomes. We sought to evaluate trends and midterm outcomes of lung transplant recipients of HCV NAT+ donor allografts.

METHODS

All adults undergoing isolated lung transplantation in the United Network for Organ Sharing database from January 2016 to December 2022 were included in the study. Lung transplant recipients were stratified based on donor HCV status (HCV NAT+ vs NAT-). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences between groups. Several outcomes, including acute rejection by 1 year, early (30-day and in-hospital) mortality, and both 1- and 3-year survival, were compared between matched groups.

RESULTS

A total of 16,725 patients underwent lung transplantation during the study period, with 489 (3%) receiving HCV NAT+ donor lungs. Regions 1 (18%) and 6/8 (both 0%) had the highest and lowest proportions, respectively, of HCV NAT+ donor transplants. Utilization of HCV NAT+ donors increased throughout the study period from 2 (0.1%) in 2016 to a peak of 117 (5%) in 2019. Donors who were HCV NAT+ were younger (34 vs 36 years, p < 0.001), more often female (44% vs 39%, p < 0.01), and more commonly died due to drug intoxication (56% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Recipients of HCV NAT+ donor lungs were similar in age (62 vs 62 years, p = 0.69) and female gender (43% vs 39%, p = 0.15) but had lower lung allocation scores (38 vs 41, p < 0.001) compared to others. Rates of acute rejection (13% vs 17%, p = 0.09), early mortality (30-day: 2% vs 1%, p = 0.59, in-hospital: 3% vs 4%, p = 0.38), as well as 1-year (90% vs 92%, p = 0.29) and 3-year survival (69% vs 75%, p = 0.13) were not significantly different between matched groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplant recipients of HCV NAT+ donor allografts experience similar rates of acute rejection, early mortality, and 3-year survival compared to all other lung recipients. Increased use of HCV NAT+ donor allografts may help to expand the donor pool and alleviate donor shortages.

Outcomes of lung transplantation from donors with hepatitis C viremia with outpatient initiation of antiviral therapy

Transplantation of lungs from donors with active hepatitis C viremia with early initiation of antiviral therapy has been shown to have similar short- and medium-term outcomes compared to transplantation of lungs from nonviremic donors. Consideration of hepatitis C viremic lungs is particularly helpful in patients with anticipated prolonged time on the waiting list. Whether clinical outcomes remain favorable with delay of initiation of antiviral therapy to the outpatient setting or in patients with higher severity of illness is not well understood. Our transplant center considered hepatitis C nucleic acid testing positive (NAT+) donors for all waitlisted lung transplant candidates without chronic liver disease. For those transplanted with hepatitis C NAT+ lungs, we initiated antiviral therapy in the outpatient setting and continued treatment for 12 weeks. In a retrospective single-center study of 15 lung transplant recipients receiving hepatitis C NAT+ lungs and 88 recipients receiving nonviremic lungs, we tested the hypothesis that deferral of antiviral therapy after transplantation of lungs from hepatitis C NAT+ donors to the outpatient setting would result in similar 1-year survival compared to transplantation of lungs from nonviremic donors. Patients receiving hepatitis C NAT+ lungs had similar baseline characteristics but had longer index hospital lengths of stay (24 vs 13 days, p = 0.021). Patients receiving hepatitis C NAT+ lungs had fewer episodes of acute cellular rejection in the first year. Patients receiving hepatitis C NAT+ lungs had similar 1-year survival to patients receiving lungs from nonviremic donors, after controlling for age and lung allocation score (p = 0.638). In this small single-center study, outpatient initiation of antiviral therapy for donor-derived hepatitis C is associated with acceptable clinical outcomes and can be considered in patients with high severity of illness.

Using HCV-viremic organs for lung transplantation does not confer higher rejection rates compared to HCV-negative organs

BACKGROUND

National data demonstrate that hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected organ donors are increasingly being used in the US, including for lung transplantation. We aimed to assess whether there were any differences in the acute or chronic rejection rates at 1 year following lung transplantation from HCV-viremic versus uninfected donors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all lung transplant recipients at our institution from April 1, 2017 to October 1, 2020 and then assessed various outcomes between those who received a transplant from HCV-viremic donors versus HCV-negative donors. Primary outcome was to determine if there was a higher incidence of acute and/or chronic allograft rejection when using HCV NAT+ lung donation. We carried out univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

We transplanted 135 patients during the study period, including 18 from HCV-viremic donors. Standard induction therapy with basiliximab and maintenance triple drug immunosuppression was utilized per UC San Diego protocol. All 17 patients receiving HCV-viremic organs developed acute HCV infection and were treated in the postoperative period with 12 weeks of direct acting antivirals (DAA). HCV genotypes included 1, 2, and 3. DAA used included glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (12), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (1), and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (2) with drug choice determined by patient's medical insurance coverage. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks after end of DAA therapy (SVR12), indicative of a cure, was achieved in all (100%) recipients. No recipient had a serious adverse event related to HCV infection. The lung transplant recipient (LTR) HCV-viremic donors had lower rates of clinically significant rejection (5.9% vs. 11% LTR HCV-nonviremic donors), and no chronic lung allograft dysfunction at 1 year (vs. 5.9% LTR HCV-nonviremic donors). One-year survival was 100% in the LTR HCV-viremic donors compared to 95.8% in the LTR HCV-nonviremic donors.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the feasibility and success of using HCV NAT + donors with excellent results and without a higher incidence of rejection. Longer term follow-up and a larger sample size are needed to allow this to be a more widely accepted practice for lung transplant programs and payors.

Lung Donor Selection and Management: An Updated Review

The shortage of donor lungs for transplantation is a major challenge, resulting in longer waitlist times for patients with a higher risk of waitlist mortality. It is crucial to continue promoting awareness about organ donation through legislation, public campaigns, and health care provider education. Only a small number of cadaveric donors meet the ideal criteria for lung donation, leaving many lungs unused. Donor lung utilization can be improved by carefully considering the extended-criteria donors, actively participating in donor management, and by utilizing the modalities to assess and manage the marginal lungs after retrieval from the donor. The purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date review of donor selection, assessment of donor lungs, and donor lung management to enhance organ recovery rates for lung transplantation.

The SHELTER Trial of Transplanting Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Lungs Into Uninfected Recipients

SHELTER is a trial of transplanting lungs from deceased donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection into HCV-negative candidates (sponsor: Merck; NCT03724149). Few trials have reported outcomes using thoracic organs from HCV-RNA+ donors and none have reported quality of life (QOL).

Methods

This study is a single-arm trial of 10 lung transplants at a single center. Patients were included who were between 18 and 67 y of age and waitlisted for lung-only transplant. Patients were excluded who had evidence of liver disease. Primary outcome was HCV cure (sustained virologic response 12 wk after completing antiviral therapy). Recipients longitudinally reported QOL using the validated RAND-36 instrument. We also applied advanced methods to match HCV-RNA+ lung recipients to HCV-negative lung recipients in a 1:3 ratio at the same center.

Results

Between November 2018 and November 2020, 18 patients were consented and opted-in for HCV-RNA+ lung offers in the allocation system. After a median of 37 d (interquartile range [IQR], 6-373) from opt-in, 10 participants received double lung transplants. The median recipient age was 57 y (IQR, 44-67), and 7 recipients (70%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The median lung allocation score at transplant was 34.3 (IQR, 32.7-86.9). Posttransplant, 5 recipients developed primary graft dysfunction grade 3 on day 2 or 3, although none required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Nine patients received elbasvir/grazoprevir, whereas 1 patient received sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. All 10 patients were cured of HCV and survived to 1 y (versus 83% 1-y survival among matched comparators). No serious adverse events were found to be related to HCV or treatment. RAND-36 scores showed substantial improvement in physical QOL and some improvement in mental QOL. We also examined forced expiratory volume in 1 s-the most important lung function parameter after transplantation. We detected no clinically important differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 s between the HCV-RNA+ lung recipients versus matched comparators.

Conclusions

SHELTER adds important evidence regarding the safety of transplanting HCV-RNA+ lungs into uninfected recipients and suggests QOL benefits.

Preemptive antiviral therapy in lung transplantation from hepatitis C donors results in a rapid and sustained virologic response

Objective

The study objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of a preemptive direct-acting antiviral therapy in lung transplants from hepatitis C virus donors to uninfected recipients.

Methods

This study is a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, pilot trial. Recipients of hepatitis C virus nucleic acid test positive donor lungs underwent preemptive direct-acting antiviral therapy with glecaprevir 300 mg/pibrentasvir 120 mg for 8 weeks from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Recipients of nucleic acid test positive lungs were compared with recipients of lungs from nucleic acid test negative donors. Primary end points were Kaplan-Meier survival and sustained virologic response. Secondary outcomes included primary graft dysfunction, rejection, and infection.

Results

Fifty-nine lung transplantations were included: 16 nucleic acid test positive and 43 nucleic acid test negative. Twelve nucleic acid test positive recipients (75%) developed hepatitis C virus viremia. Median time to clearance was 7 days. All nucleic acid test positive patients had undetectable hepatitis C virus RNA by week 3, and all alive patients (n = 15) remained negative during follow-up with 100% sustained virologic response at 12 months. One nucleic acid test positive patient died of primary graft dysfunction and multiorgan failure. Three of 43 nucleic acid test negative patients (7%) had hepatitis C virus antibody positive donors. None of them developed hepatitis C virus viremia. One-year survival was 94% for nucleic acid test positive recipients and 91% for nucleic acid test negative recipients. There was no difference in primary graft dysfunction, rejection, or infection. One-year survival for nucleic acid test positive recipients was similar to a historical cohort of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (89%).

Conclusions

Recipients of hepatitis C virus nucleic acid test positive lungs have similar survival as recipients of nucleic acid test negative lungs. Preemptive direct-acting antiviral therapy results in rapid viral clearance and sustained virologic response at 12 months. Preemptive direct-acting antiviral may partially prevent hepatitis C virus transmission.

Trends in use and three-year outcomes of hepatitis C virus-viremic donor lung transplants for hepatitis C virus-seronegative recipients

OBJECTIVE

The feasibility and 6-month outcome safety of lung transplants (LTs) from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic donors for HCV-seronegative recipients (R-) were established in 2019, but longer-term safety and uptake of this practice nationally remain unknown.

METHODS

We identified HCV-seronegative LT recipients (R-) 2015-2020 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We classified donors as seronegative (D-) or viremic (D+). We used χ2 testing, rank-sum testing, and Cox regression to compare posttransplant outcomes between HCV D+/R- and D-/R- LT recipients.

RESULTS

HCV D+/R- LT increased from 2 to 97/year; centers performing HCV D+/R- LT increased from 1 to 25. HCV D+/R- versus HCV D-/R- LT recipients had more obstructive disease (35.7% vs 23.3%, P < .001), lower lung allocation score (36.5 vs 41.1, P < .001), and longer waitlist time (P = .002). HCV D+/R- LT had similar risk of acute rejection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.87; P = .58), extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (aOR, 1.94; P = .10), and tracheostomy (aOR, 0.42; P = .16); similar median hospital stay (P = .07); and lower risk of ventilator > 48 hours (aOR, 0.68; P = .006). Adjusting for donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics, risk of all-cause graft failure and mortality were similar at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years for HCV D+/R- versus HCV D-/R- LT (all P > .1), as well as for high- (≥20/year) versus low-volume LT centers and high- (≥5/year) versus low-volume HCV D+/R- LT centers (all P > .5).

CONCLUSIONS

HCV D+/R- and HCV D-/R- LT have similar outcomes at 3 years posttransplant. These results underscore the safety of HCV D+/R- LT and the potential benefit of expanding this practice further.

Expanding the Lung Donor Pool: Donation After Circulatory Death, Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion and Hepatitis C Donors

"Organ shortage remains a limiting factor in lung transplantation. Traditionally, donation after brain death has been the main source of lungs used for transplantation; however, to meet the demand of patients requiring lung transplantation it is crucial to find innovative methods for organ donation. The implementation of extended donors, lung donation after cardiac death (DCD), the use of ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) systems, and more recently the acceptance of hepatitis C donors have started to close the gap between organ donors and recipients in need of lung transplantation. This article focuses on the expansion of donor lungs for transplantation after DCD, the use of EVLP in evaluating extended criteria lungs, and the use of lung grafts from donors with hepatitis C."